-
Journal of Affective Disorders May 2003This paper explores whether individuals with a mood disorder can identify the nature and duration of depressive and manic prodromes. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This paper explores whether individuals with a mood disorder can identify the nature and duration of depressive and manic prodromes.
METHODS
Seventy-three publications of prodromal symptoms in bipolar and unipolar disorders were identified by computer searches of seven databases (including MEDLINE and PsycLIT) supplemented by hand searches of journals. Seventeen studies (total sample=1191 subjects) met criteria for inclusion in a systematic review.
RESULTS
At least 80% of individuals with a mood disorder can identify one or more prodromal symptoms. There are limited data about unipolar disorders. In bipolar disorders, early symptoms of mania are identified more frequently than early symptoms of depression. The most robust early symptom of mania is sleep disturbance (median prevalence 77%). Early symptoms of depression are inconsistent. The mean length of manic prodromes (>20 days) was consistently reported to be longer than depressive prodromes (<19 days). However, depressive prodromes showed greater inter-individual variation (ranging from 2 to 365 days) in duration than manic prodromes (1-120 days).
LIMITATIONS
Few prospective studies of bipolar, and particularly unipolar disorders have been reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Early symptoms of relapse in affective disorders can be identified. Explanations of the apparent differences in the recognition and length of prodromes between mania and bipolar depression are explored. Further research on duration, sequence of symptom appearance and characteristics of prodromes is warranted to clarify the clinical usefulness of early symptom monitoring.
Topics: Bipolar Disorder; Humans; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 12738039
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00266-5 -
Current Neuropharmacology 2023An increased risk of manic episodes has been reported in patients with neurodegenerative disorders, but the clinical features of bipolar disorder (BD) in different...
BACKGROUND
An increased risk of manic episodes has been reported in patients with neurodegenerative disorders, but the clinical features of bipolar disorder (BD) in different subtypes of dementia have not been thoroughly investigated.
OBJECTIVES
The main aim of this study is to systematically review clinical and therapeutic evidence about manic syndromes in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Since manic-mixed episodes have been associated to negative outcomes in patients with dementia and often require medical intervention, we also critically summarized selected studies with relevance for the treatment of mania in patients with cognitive decline.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched up to February 2022. Sixty-one articles on patients with AD, VaD, or FTD and BD or (hypo) mania have been included.
RESULTS
Manic symptoms seem to be associated to disease progression in AD, have a greatly variable temporal relationship with cognitive decline in VaD, and frequently coincide with or precede cognitive impairment in FTD. Overall, mood stabilizers, and electroconvulsive therapy may be the most effective treatments, while the benefits of short-term treatment with antipsychotic agents must be balanced with the associated risks. Importantly, low-dose lithium salts may exert neuroprotective activity in patients with AD.
CONCLUSION
Prevalence, course, and characteristics of manic syndromes in patients with dementia may be differentially affected by the nature of the underlying neurodegenerative conditions.
Topics: Humans; Bipolar Disorder; Frontotemporal Dementia; Alzheimer Disease; Mania; Antipsychotic Agents; Antimanic Agents
PubMed: 35794767
DOI: 10.2174/1570159X20666220706110157 -
Journal of Affective Disorders Sep 2017Mania can occur secondary to a medical condition and can be elicited by various pharmacological treatments, both in patients with or without a history of affective... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Mania can occur secondary to a medical condition and can be elicited by various pharmacological treatments, both in patients with or without a history of affective disorder. Antibiotic-induced mania or antibiomania is suggested to be a rare phenomenon. We reviewed the literature in order to collect published reports of antibiomania and to summarize new insights about its mechanism and management.
METHODS
We performed a MEDLINE-search and used manual cross-referencing for reports of antibiotic-induced mania and included cases in which a (hypo)manic episode was diagnosed in close temporal relationship with the prescription of an antibiotic.
RESULTS
47 cases were published. Patients' ages ranged from 3 to 77 years (mean 40). Two-thirds of the cases were male. Twelve different anti-bacterial agents were implicated, with antitubercular agents, macrolides and quinolones being the most common causative groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Antibiotic treatment can be associated with (hypo)mania. The paucity of reported cases precludes statements regarding incidence or antibiotic-specific warnings. In the event of an antibiotic-induced mania, the suspicious drug should be discontinued and manic symptoms can be treated lege artis. The pathophysiological mechanism of antibiomania remains elusive.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Macrolides; Male; Middle Aged; Quinolones; Young Adult
PubMed: 28550767
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.029 -
Bipolar Disorders Jun 2022Cognitive impairments are an emerging treatment target in mood disorders, but currently there are no evidence-based pro-cognitive treatments indicated for patients in... (Review)
Review
Randomised controlled cognition trials in remitted patients with mood disorders published between 2015 and 2021: A systematic review by the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Targeting Cognition Task Force.
BACKGROUND
Cognitive impairments are an emerging treatment target in mood disorders, but currently there are no evidence-based pro-cognitive treatments indicated for patients in remission. With this systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Targeting Cognition Task force provides an update of the most promising treatments and methodological recommendations.
METHODS
The review included RCTs of candidate pro-cognitive interventions in fully or partially remitted patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder. We followed the procedures of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycInfo, EMBASE and Cochrane Library from January 2015, when two prior systematic reviews were conducted, until February 2021. Two independent authors reviewed the studies with the Revised Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool for Randomised trials.
RESULTS
We identified 16 RCTs (N = 859) investigating cognitive remediation (CR; k = 6; N = 311), direct current or repetitive magnetic stimulation (k = 3; N = 127), or pharmacological interventions (k = 7; N = 421). CR showed most consistent cognitive benefits, with two trials showing improvements on primary outcomes. Neuromodulatory interventions revealed no clear efficacy. Among pharmacological interventions, modafinil and lurasidone showed early positive results. Sources of bias included small samples, lack of pre-screening for objective cognitive impairment, no primary outcome and no information on allocation sequence masking.
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence for pro-cognitive treatments in mood disorders is emerging. Recommendations are to increase sample sizes, pre-screen for impairment in targeted domain(s), select one primary outcome, aid transfer to real-world functioning, investigate multimodal interventions and include neuroimaging.
Topics: Bipolar Disorder; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Humans; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Mood Disorders
PubMed: 35174594
DOI: 10.1111/bdi.13193 -
Journal of Psychiatric Research May 2023To identify triggers of acute mood episodes in bipolar disorder (BD). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To identify triggers of acute mood episodes in bipolar disorder (BD).
METHODS
We performed a systematic review in the following databases: Pubmed, Embase, and PsycInfo following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. The systematic search encompassed all relevant studies published until May 23rd, 2022.
RESULTS
A total of 108 studies (case reports/case series, interventional, prospective and retrospective studies) were included in the systematic review. While several decompensation triggers were identified, pharmacotherapy was the one with the largest body of evidence, particularly the use of antidepressants as triggers of manic/hypomanic episodes. Other identified triggers for mania were brain stimulation, energy drinks, acetyl-l-carnitine, St. John's wort, seasonal changes, hormonal changes and viral infections. There is a relative paucity of evidence concerning triggers for depressive relapses in BD, with possible triggers including fasting, decreased sleep and stressful life events.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first systematic review about triggers/precipitants of relapse in BD. Despite the importance of identification and management of potential triggers for BD decompensation, there is a lack of large observational studies addressing this topic, with most of the included studies being case reports/case series. Notwithstanding these limitations, antidepressant use is the trigger with the strongest evidence for manic relapse. More studies are needed to identify and manage triggers for relapse in BD.
Topics: Humans; Bipolar Disorder; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Affect; Antidepressive Agents; Mania; Recurrence
PubMed: 36940629
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.03.008 -
Brain Sciences Feb 2023Previous research suggests that there is a link between perfectionism and symptoms of depression. This study aimed to see if different types of perfectionism are linked... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Previous research suggests that there is a link between perfectionism and symptoms of depression. This study aimed to see if different types of perfectionism are linked differently to symptoms of depression in mood disorders and if there is a relationship between perfectionism and symptoms of mania in bipolar disorder.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in the databases PsycINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed to find papers which examined the relationship in clinical depression and bipolar disorder. A meta-analysis pooled the correlation effect sizes for mood symptoms severity and the severity of the perfectionism subtype.
RESULTS
Twelve papers were included in the review, with five of these being included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis found statistically significant positive correlations between greater severity of depression symptoms and more severe perfectionism for the following subtypes: concern over mistakes, doubts about actions, other-oriented perfectionism, parental criticism, self-oriented perfectionism, and socially prescribed perfectionism. There was no significant relationship between depression symptoms and perfectionism subtypes of organisation and personal standards. There were not enough studies reporting data for manic symptoms for the meta-analysis or for any firm conclusions to be drawn.
CONCLUSIONS
The relationship between depression and perfectionism differs depending on the particular type of perfectionism examined. Most studies were cross-sectional and correlational, so causation cannot be inferred, and future longitudinal studies are needed.
PubMed: 36979187
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13030377 -
Journal of Affective Disorders Jul 2023The possibility of atypical antipsychotics (AA) to induce manic symptoms has been raised by several articles. The objective of this study was to describe whether... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The possibility of atypical antipsychotics (AA) to induce manic symptoms has been raised by several articles. The objective of this study was to describe whether exposure to AA may induce mania in mood disorders.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. The systematic search encompassed all relevant studies published until April 4th, 2022. A meta-analysis testing whether treatment emergent mania (TEM) is more frequent with the use of AA compared with placebo was performed.
RESULTS
A total of 52 studies were included in the systematic review. We found 24 case reports or case series describing 40 manic/hypomanic episodes allegedly induced by AA. Twenty-one placebo-controlled trials were included in a meta-analysis including 4823 individuals treated with AA and 3252 individuals receiving placebo. Our meta-analysis showed that the use of AA protects against the development of TEM (OR: 0.68 [95 % CI: 0.52-0.89], p = 0.005).
LIMITATIONS
AA-induced mania/hypomania was not the primary outcome in any of the observational or interventional studies. TEM was not homogeneously defined across studies. In most case reports it was not possible to establish causality between the use of AA and the development of manic symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS
TEM is more frequent with placebo than with AA, which suggests that AA exposure does not represent a relevant risk for TEM. Mania/hypomania induced by an AA seems to be rare events, since anecdotal evidence from case reports and case series were not observed in observational prospective and interventional studies.
Topics: Humans; Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Mania; Prospective Studies; Mood Disorders
PubMed: 37084970
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.037 -
Journal of Affective Disorders Aug 2023Bipolar disorder is a severe and chronic mental illness characterized by recurrent major depressive episodes and mania or hypomania. In addition to the burden of the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Bipolar disorder is a severe and chronic mental illness characterized by recurrent major depressive episodes and mania or hypomania. In addition to the burden of the disease and its consequences, self-stigma can impact people with bipolar disorder. This review investigates the current state of research in self-stigma in bipolar disorder.
METHODS
An electronic search was carried out until February 2022. Three academic databases were systematically searched, and best-evidence synthesis was made.
RESULTS
Sixty-six articles were related to self-stigma in bipolar disorder. Seven key themes were extracted from these studies: 1/ Comparison of self-stigma in bipolar disorder and other mental illnesses, 2/ Sociocultural context and self-stigma, 3/ Correlates and predictors of self-stigma, 4/ Consequences of self-stigma, 5/ Treatments and self-stigma, 6/ Management of self-stigma, and 7/ Self-stigma and recovery in bipolar disorder.
LIMITATIONS
Firstly, a meta-analysis could not be performed due to the heterogeneity of the studies. Secondly, limiting the search to self-stigma has excluded other forms of stigma that also have an impact. Thirdly, the under-reporting of negative or nonsignificant results due to publication bias and unpublished studies might have limited the accuracy of this reviews' synthesis.
CONCLUSION
Research on self-stigma in persons with bipolar disorder has been the focused on different aspects, and interventions to reduce self-stigmatization have been developed, but evidence of their effectiveness is still sparse. Clinicians need to be attentive to self-stigma, its assessment, and its empowerment in their daily clinical practice. Future work is required to establish valid strategies to fight self-stigma.
Topics: Humans; Bipolar Disorder; Depressive Disorder, Major; Social Stigma; Mania
PubMed: 37207946
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.05.041 -
Psychiatry Research Feb 2024Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are widely used in treating schizophrenia and related disorders, also other mental disorders. However, the efficacy and safety of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are widely used in treating schizophrenia and related disorders, also other mental disorders. However, the efficacy and safety of SGAs for treating other mental disorders is unclear. A systematic literature search for randomized, placebo-controlled trials of 11 SGAs for treating 18 mental disorders apart from schizophrenia were carried out from database inception to April 3, 2022. The primary outcome was the mean change in the total score for different mental disorders. The secondary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) of response, remission rates and risk ratio (RR) of adverse events (AEs). A total of 181 studies (N = 65,480) were included. All SGAs showed significant effects in treating other mental disorders compared with placebo, except autistic disorder and dementia. Aripiprazole is the most effective treatment for bipolar mania [effect size = -0.90, 95% CI: -1.59, -0.21] and Tourette's disorder [effect size = -0.80, 95% CI: -1.14, -0.45], olanzapine for bipolar depression [effect size = -0.86, 95% CI: -1.32, -0.39] and post-traumatic stress disorder [effect size = -0.98, 95% CI: -1.55, -0.41], lurasidone for depression [effect size = -0.66, 95% CI: -0.82, -0.50], quetiapine for anxiety [effect size = -1.20, 95% CI: -1.96, -0.43], sleep disorders [effect size = -1.2, 95% CI: -1.97, -0.58], and delirium [effect size = -0.36, 95% CI: -0.70, -0.03], and risperidone for obsessive-compulsive disorder [effect size = -2.37, 95% CI: -3.25, -1.49], respectively. For safety, AE items for each SGAs was different. Interestingly, we found that some AEs of OLZ, QTP, RIS and PALI have significant palliative effects on some symptoms. Significant differences in the efficacy and safety of different SGAs for treatment of other mental disorders should be considered for choosing the drug and for the balance between efficacy and tolerability for the specific patient.
Topics: Humans; Antipsychotic Agents; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia
PubMed: 38150810
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115637 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Aug 2007Bipolar disorder, with mood swings between depression and mania, may affect up to 1.5% of adults, and increases the risk of suicide and disability. Most people improve... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Bipolar disorder, with mood swings between depression and mania, may affect up to 1.5% of adults, and increases the risk of suicide and disability. Most people improve over time, but two thirds may have residual dysfunction, and at least 40% may have recurrent episodes.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments in people with mania associated with bipolar disorder? What are the effects of treatments in bipolar depression? What are the effects of interventions to prevent relapse of mania or bipolar depression? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and other important databases up to July 2006 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 60 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: antidepressants, carbamazepine, chlorpromazine, clonazepam, cognitive therapy, education, family-focused psychoeducation, gabapentin, haloperidol, lamotrigine, lithium, olanzapine, psychological treatments, quetiapine, risperidone, topiramate, valproate, and ziprasidone.
Topics: Acute Disease; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Risperidone; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 19454110
DOI: No ID Found