-
Surgical Neurology International 2022Hypertonic saline (HS) and mannitol are hyperosmolar agents that are usually used to reduce intracranial pressure (ICP) and provide a satisfactory brain relaxation. The... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Hypertonic saline (HS) and mannitol are hyperosmolar agents that are usually used to reduce intracranial pressure (ICP) and provide a satisfactory brain relaxation. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of HS and mannitol on brain relaxation intraoperatively in patient undergoing craniotomies for supra-tentorial brain tumors.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. We included randomized control trials that compared equiosmolar HS and mannitol in supratentorial tumors craniotomies and reported at least one of the following outcomes: degree of brain relaxation, ICP, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, perioperative fluid input, urine output, Na+ levels, and K+ levels. We searched Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase using MESH terms and keywords. The bibliographic references of included studies and trial registries were also searched.
RESULTS
Seven articles were included. The degree brain of relaxation was comparable across the two groups with slight tendency toward HS (RR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.99-1.29; = 0.08). Mannitol was associated with significantly higher urine output (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1.33, 95% CI -1.56--1.10; < 0.001). Na levels were higher in HS group (SMD = 1.47, 95% CI 0.86-2.09; < 0.001). Mannitol was associated with non-significant decrease in CVP and increase fluid input (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI 0.00-0.85 and SMD = -0.18, 95% CI -0.37-0.02, respectively).
CONCLUSION
Both HS and mannitol are associated with satisfactory brain relaxation with a non-statistically significant tendency for HS to achieve better relaxation scores with mannitol resulting in higher urine output while HS with higher Na levels.
PubMed: 35509546
DOI: 10.25259/SNI_136_2022 -
Cureus Jan 2024Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is occasionally an inevitable side effect of neuraxial anesthesia, which can happen after spinal anesthesia or if an accidental dural... (Review)
Review
Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is occasionally an inevitable side effect of neuraxial anesthesia, which can happen after spinal anesthesia or if an accidental dural puncture (ADP) happens during epidural anesthesia. The treatment and prevention options for PDPH differ widely from one institution to another. The management of PDPH is heterogeneous in many institutions because of the absence of clear guidelines and protocols for the management of PDPH. This study aimed to summarize all articles published during the past decade that discussed the treatment or prevention of PDPH. From 2013 to 2023, 345 publications were filtered for all treatment and prevention approaches used for PDPH patients. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines were followed for conducting this systematic review, and 38 articles were included for analysis and review. Existing data come from small randomized clinical trials and retrospective or prospective cohort studies. This review supports the effect of oral pregabalin and intravenous aminophylline in both treatment and prevention. Intravenous mannitol, intravenous hydrocortisone, triple prophylactic regimen, and neostigmine plus atropine combination showed effective and beneficial outcomes. On the other hand, neither neuraxial morphine nor epidural dexamethasone showed promising results. Consequently, the use of neuraxial morphine or epidural dexamethasone for the prevention of PDPH remains questionable. Regarding the posture of the patient and its consequences on the incidence of the headache, lateral decubitus is better than a sitting position, and a prone position is better than a supine position. Smaller non-cutting needles play a role in avoiding PDPH. Minimally invasive nerve blocks, including sphenopalatine ganglion or greater occipital nerves, are satisfyingly effective. Epidural blood patches remain the more invasive but the gold standard and ultimate solution in patients resisting medical therapy. This study highlights the need for larger research to define the best approach to prevent and treat PDPH.
PubMed: 38361721
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52330 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2011Cerebral oedema occurs with cerebral malaria, and some clinicians think osmotic diuretics, such as mannitol or urea, may improve outcomes. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cerebral oedema occurs with cerebral malaria, and some clinicians think osmotic diuretics, such as mannitol or urea, may improve outcomes.
OBJECTIVES
To compare mannitol or urea to placebo or no diuretic for treating children or adults with cerebral malaria.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register (Issue 4, 2010), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 12, 2010), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2010), EMBASE (1974 to November 2010), LILACS (1982 to November 2010), and the reference lists of articles. We contacted relevant organizations and researchers.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing mannitol or urea to placebo or no treatment in children and adults with cerebral malaria. Primary outcomes were death, life-threatenining sequelae and major neurological sequelae at six months.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors applied the inclusion criteria, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data independently.
MAIN RESULTS
One trial met the inclusion criteria, comparing mannitol 20% to saline placebo in 156 Ugandan children. Allocation was concealed. No difference in mortality, time to regain consciousness, or neurological sequelae were detected.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There are insufficient data to know what the effects of osmotic diuretics are in children with cerebral malaria. Larger, multicentre trials are needed.
Topics: Adult; Antimalarials; Child; Diuretics, Osmotic; Humans; Malaria, Cerebral; Mannitol; Quinine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Uganda; Urea
PubMed: 21491391
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004615.pub3 -
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy Apr 2016To comparatively evaluate hypertonic sodium (HTS) and mannitol in patients following acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) on the outcomes of all-cause mortality,... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Hypertonic Sodium Solutions and Mannitol for Traumatic Brain Injury: Implications for Emergency Department Management.
OBJECTIVE
To comparatively evaluate hypertonic sodium (HTS) and mannitol in patients following acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) on the outcomes of all-cause mortality, neurological disability, intracranial pressure (ICP) change from baseline, ICP treatment failure, and serious adverse events.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP (World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) were searched (inception to November 2015) using hypertonic saline solutions, sodium chloride, mannitol, osmotic diuretic, traumatic brain injury, brain injuries, and head injury. Searches were limited to humans. Clinical practice guidelines and bibliographies were reviewed.
STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION
Prospective, randomized trials comparing HTS and mannitol in adults (≥16 years) with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤8) and elevated ICP were included. ICP elevation, ICP reduction, and treatment failure were defined using study definitions.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Of 326 articles screened, 7 trials enrolling a total of 191 patients met inclusion criteria. Studies were underpowered to detect a significant difference in mortality or neurological outcomes. Due to significant heterogeneity and differences in reporting ICP change from baseline, this outcome was not meta-analyzed. No difference between HTS and mannitol was observed for mean ICP reduction; however, risk of ICP treatment failure favored HTS (risk ratio [RR] = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.18-0.81). Serious adverse events were not reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on limited data, clinically important differences in mortality, neurological outcomes, and ICP reduction were not observed between HTS or mannitol in the management of severe TBI. HTS appears to lead to fewer ICP treatment failures.
Topics: Adult; Brain Injuries; Diuretics, Osmotic; Emergency Service, Hospital; Humans; Intracranial Hypertension; Intracranial Pressure; Mannitol; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Saline Solution, Hypertonic; Treatment Failure
PubMed: 26825644
DOI: 10.1177/1060028016628893 -
World Neurosurgery Dec 2018Mannitol has been widely applied as a priority drug in the clinical treatment for brain edema and increased intracranial pressure (ICP) after intracerebral hemorrhage... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Mannitol has been widely applied as a priority drug in the clinical treatment for brain edema and increased intracranial pressure (ICP) after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, no consensus on the efficacy and safety of mannitol has been achieved. Our meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effect of mannitol in the early stage of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) and provided a treatment reference for clinicians.
METHOD
All relevant studies on mannitol treatment of supratentorial HICH were identified from the databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, VIP, CNKI and Wan Fang. Our outcome measures included the incidence of hematoma enlargement, the neurological function improvement rate, mortality and the incidence of aggravated brain edema. The subgroup analysis was performed to explore the impact of study type, year of publication, intervention time and dose on the outcome measures. Publication bias was assessed by the funnel plot.
RESULTS
Thirty-four studies consisting of 3627 patients with supratentorial HICH were included in this study (range from 2000 to 2018). Significant statistical difference was found between mannitol and non-mannitol group in terms of all the outcome measures, including the incidence of hematoma enlargement (p < 0.00001), the neurological function improvement rate (p < 0.00001), mortality (p < 0.00001) and the incidence of aggravated cerebral edema (p = 0.0002). In subgroup analysis, the results showed study type and intervention time did not significantly affect the outcome measures. No significant statistical difference was found in the subgroups of publication time (after 2010) (p = 0.08) and half-dose of mannitol (p = 0.20) on mortality. In addition, the further analysis showed whatever the dose (250ml and 125ml) and intervention time (<24h, <12h, <6h) was, mannitol could lead to the hematoma enlargement.
CONCLUSION
For patients without obvious symptoms of intracranial hypertension or cerebral palsy, it is not recommended to use mannitol routinely in the early stage of supratentorial HICH. More high-quality trials should be included to confirm our conclusion and to ascertain the best time and dose of mannitol to use.
PubMed: 30576817
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.249 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2020Increased intracranial pressure has been shown to be strongly associated with poor neurological outcomes and mortality for patients with acute traumatic brain injury.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Increased intracranial pressure has been shown to be strongly associated with poor neurological outcomes and mortality for patients with acute traumatic brain injury. Currently, most efforts to treat these injuries focus on controlling the intracranial pressure. Hypertonic saline is a hyperosmolar therapy that is used in traumatic brain injury to reduce intracranial pressure. The effectiveness of hypertonic saline compared with other intracranial pressure-lowering agents in the management of acute traumatic brain injury is still debated, both in the short and the long term.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of hypertonic saline versus other intracranial pressure-lowering agents in the management of acute traumatic brain injury.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched Cochrane Injuries' Specialised Register, CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase Classic+Embase, ISI Web of Science: Science Citation Index and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, as well as trials registers, on 11 December 2019. We supplemented these searches with searches of four major Chinese databases on 19 September 2018. We also checked bibliographies, and contacted trial authors to identify additional trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We sought to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of hypertonic saline versus other intracranial pressure-lowering agents for people with acute traumatic brain injury of any severity. We excluded cross-over trials as incompatible with assessing long-term outcomes.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened search results to identify potentially eligible trials and extracted data using a standard data extraction form. Outcome measures included: mortality at end of follow-up (all-cause); death or disability (as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)); uncontrolled intracranial pressure (defined as failure to decrease the intracranial pressure to target and/or requiring additional intervention); and adverse events e.g. rebound phenomena; pulmonary oedema; acute renal failure during treatment).
MAIN RESULTS
Six trials, involving data from 287 people, met the inclusion criteria. The majority of participants (91%) had a diagnosis of severe traumatic brain injury. We had concerns about particular domains of risk of bias in each trial, as physicians were not reliably blinded to allocation, two trials contained participants with conditions other than traumatic brain injury and in one trial, we had concerns about missing data for important outcomes. The original protocol was available for only one trial and other trials (where registered) were registered retrospectively. Meta-analysis for both the primary outcome (mortality at final follow-up) and for 'poor outcome' as per conventionally dichotomised GOS criteria, was only possible for two trials. Synthesis of long-term outcomes was inhibited by the fact that two trials ceased data collection within two hours of a single bolus dose of an intracranial pressure-lowering agent and one at discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). Only three trials collected data after participants were released from hospital, one of which did not report mortality and reported a 'poor outcome' by GOS criteria in an unconventional way. Substantial missing data in a key trial meant that in meta-analysis we report 'best-case' and 'worst-case' estimates alongside available case analysis. In no scenario did we discern a clear difference between treatments for either mortality or poor neurological outcome. Due to variation in modes of drug administration (including whether it followed or did not follow cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, as well as different follow-up times and ways of reporting changes in intracranial pressure, as well as no uniform definition of 'uncontrolled intracranial pressure', we did not perform meta-analysis for this outcome and report results narratively, by individual trial. Trials tended to report both treatments to be effective in reducing elevated intracranial pressure but that hypertonic saline had increased benefits, usually adding that pretreatment factors need to be considered (e.g. serum sodium and both system and brain haemodynamics). No trial provided data for our other outcomes of interest. We consider evidence quality for all outcomes to be very low, as assessed by GRADE; we downgraded all conclusions due to imprecision (small sample size), indirectness (due to choice of measurement and/or selection of participants without traumatic brain injury), and in some cases, risk of bias and inconsistency. Only one of the included trials reported data on adverse effects; a rebound phenomenon, which was present only in the comparator group (mannitol). None of the trials reported data on pulmonary oedema or acute renal failure during treatment. On the whole, trial authors do not seem to have rigorously sought to collect data on adverse events.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review set out to find trials comparing hypertonic saline to a potential range of other intracranial pressure-lowering agents, but only identified trials comparing it with mannitol or mannitol in combination with glycerol. Based on limited data, there is weak evidence to suggest that hypertonic saline is no better than mannitol in efficacy and safety in the long-term management of acute traumatic brain injury. Future research should be comprised of large, multi-site trials, prospectively registered, reported in accordance with current best practice. Trials should investigate issues such as the type of traumatic brain injury suffered by participants and concentration of infusion and length of time over which the infusion is given.
Topics: Brain Injuries; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Glasgow Outcome Scale; Humans; Intracranial Hypertension; Intracranial Pressure; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Saline Solution, Hypertonic
PubMed: 31978260
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010904.pub3 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Nov 2007In resource-rich countries, the incidence of severe perinatal asphyxia (causing death or severe neurological impairment) is about 1/1000 live births. In resource-poor... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
In resource-rich countries, the incidence of severe perinatal asphyxia (causing death or severe neurological impairment) is about 1/1000 live births. In resource-poor countries, perinatal asphyxia is probably much more common. Data from hospital-based studies in such settings suggest an incidence of 5-10/1000 live births.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of interventions in term or near-term newborns with perinatal asphyxia? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and other important databases up to June 2006 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 25 systematic reviews, RCTs or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: anticonvulsants (prophylactic), antioxidants, calcium channel blockers, corticosteroids, fluid restriction, head and/or whole body hypothermia, hyperbaric oxygen treatment, hyperventilation, Iinotrope support, magnesium sulphate, mannitol, opiate antagonists, and resuscitation (in air versus higher concentrations of oxygen).
Topics: Acute Disease; Anticonvulsants; Asphyxia; Asphyxia Neonatorum; Calcium Channel Blockers; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Hypothermia; Hypothermia, Induced; Incidence; Pregnancy; Resuscitation
PubMed: 19450354
DOI: No ID Found -
Neurological Research Jun 2024Controlling elevated intracranial pressure following brain injury with hyperosmolar agents is one of the mainstay treatments in traumatic brain injury patients. In this... (Review)
Review
Comparing the effects of mannitol and hypertonic saline in severe traumatic brain injury patients with elevated intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
Controlling elevated intracranial pressure following brain injury with hyperosmolar agents is one of the mainstay treatments in traumatic brain injury patients. In this study, we compared the effects of hypertonic saline (HS) and mannitol in reducing increased intracranial pressure.
METHODS
A total of 637 patients from 15 studies were included in our meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were mortality, the length of stay in the hospital and ICU, and the Glasgow Outcome Scale at follow-up.
RESULTS
The mortality in the mannitol group was not statistically different compared to the HS group (RR = 1.55; 95% CI = [0.98, 2.47], = 0.06). The length of stay in the ICU was significantly shorter in the HS group (MD = 1.18, 95% CI = [0.44, 1.92], < 0.01). In terms of favorable neurological outcomes, there was no significant difference between the two agents (RR = 0.92, 95% CI = [0.11, 7.96], = 0.94). The duration of the effect was shorter in the mannitol group than in the HS group (MD = -0.67, 95% CI = [-1.00, -0.33], < 0.01).
DISCUSSION
The results showed that HS and mannitol had similar effects in reducing ICP. Although the HS was associated with a longer duration of effect and shorter ICU stay, other secondary outcomes including mortality rate and favorable neurological outcomes were similar between the two drugs. In conclusion, considering the condition of each patient individually, HS could be a reasonable option than mannitol to reduce ICP in TBI patients.
PubMed: 38825027
DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2024.2360862 -
Clinical Therapeutics Mar 2021For the treatment of cerebral edema, the use of glycerol, an osmotic agent, as well as mannitol, is popular in Asia. However, the relative therapeutic benefit of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
For the treatment of cerebral edema, the use of glycerol, an osmotic agent, as well as mannitol, is popular in Asia. However, the relative therapeutic benefit of glycerol remains unknown. The goal of this study was to investigate the comparative efficacy and safety of glycerol infusion versus mannitol infusion for cerebral edema.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus for all eligible articles published before July 2020, with no restrictions on language. Two reviewers independently screened the articles, extracted data, and carefully assessed the quality of the evidence.
FINDINGS
Eight studies (6 clinical, 2 animal) were ultimately included in the qualitative analysis, and five were included in the quantitative analysis. Pooled analyses revealed nonsignificant differences in the successful control of cerebral edema (relative risk [RR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.81-1.15). The combination therapy with glycerol led to a favorable trend in neurologic improvements. Regarding safety, glycerol was associated with a significantly lower risk of acute kidney injury (RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.69) and electrolyte disturbances (RR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.64), as well as a lower possibility of rebound effects. No hemolysis was observed at the final follow-up.
IMPLICATIONS
Although the data are limited, compared with mannitol, glycerol shows a similar level of effectiveness, a more favorable safety profile, and promising neurologic improvement in individuals with cerebral edema. Additional research is needed to confirm these findings.
PROSPERO
CRD42020187702.
Topics: Asia; Brain Edema; Glycerol; Humans; Mannitol
PubMed: 33581877
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.01.010 -
Surgical Neurology International 2024This study strives to provide a current and thorough assessment of the comparative efficacy and safety between equiosmolar quantities of hypertonic saline (HS) and...
BACKGROUND
This study strives to provide a current and thorough assessment of the comparative efficacy and safety between equiosmolar quantities of hypertonic saline (HS) and mannitol in facilitating brain relaxation for patients undergoing elective craniotomies.
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis, following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, compared the efficacy and safety of equiosmolar concentrations of mannitol and HS in elective craniotomies. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Proquest databases were searched using keywords related to mannitol, HS, and craniotomy. Results were analyzed through a random-effects model using Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio and standard mean difference. < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Thirteen randomized controlled trials encompassing 965 patients (516 in the HS group and 448 in the mannitol group) were analyzed. The quality of studies was moderate-to-high, and no significant publication bias was observed. The primary outcome, brain relaxation, favored HS over mannitol without significant heterogeneity. Mannitol was associated with increased urine output compared to HS, irrespective of dose, with high heterogeneity. HS was linked to significantly reduced fluid input, confirmed by subgroup analysis with lower heterogeneity. No significant difference was found in serum osmolality between the two agents. Serum sodium (Na) levels favored HS, whereas arterial blood Na levels also favored HS despite considerable heterogeneity. Maximum mean arterial pressure was higher with HS, but it displayed significant heterogeneity. Maximum central venous pressure showed no significant difference between the two agents, with moderate heterogeneity.
CONCLUSION
HS appears more effective than mannitol in achieving brain relaxation, and it may offer advantages in fluid management and Na balance. Clinicians should consider these findings when selecting hyperosmotic agents for neurosurgical procedures. Further research is needed to address heterogeneity in certain outcomes and guide clinical practice.
PubMed: 38741989
DOI: 10.25259/SNI_994_2023