-
Current Opinion in Pediatrics Jun 2016Constipation is a very common problem in pediatrics with both the severity of presentations and treatments varying across a broad spectrum. The majority of children with... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Constipation is a very common problem in pediatrics with both the severity of presentations and treatments varying across a broad spectrum. The majority of children with functional constipation are managed successfully without the need for specialized testing and surgical intervention. Those who present with intractable constipation, with or without fecal soiling, require referrals for motility testing that helps determine both medical and surgical management, and interventions. The literature was reviewed for publications on surgical approaches to children with severe constipation, including assessing the quality and levels of evidence and the use of objective measures to determine outcomes.
RECENT FINDINGS
There is very little in the way of recent studies evaluating surgical indications or treatment approaches for functional constipation, apart from one systematic review and one recent expert review. Although the systematic review was published in the last year, most of the studies it analyzes are older. The vast majority of studies comprise level 4 and 5 evidence.
SUMMARY
The indication for most surgical procedures is 'failed' medical management, yet no standardized definition for this exists. Many surgical procedures are proposed with little evidence to show outcomes. We recommend that the surgical evaluation and treatment of children with constipation needs to be protocolized and studied in a prospective manner using validated outcomes measures. Our center's current protocol is described.
Topics: Child; Clinical Protocols; Constipation; Diet, Healthy; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Evidence-Based Medicine; Gastrointestinal Motility; Humans; Manometry; Preoperative Care; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; United States
PubMed: 26963948
DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000345 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Apr 2012Chronic constipation is a common and extremely troublesome disorder that significantly reduces the quality of life, and this fact is consistent with the high rate at...
Chronic constipation is a common and extremely troublesome disorder that significantly reduces the quality of life, and this fact is consistent with the high rate at which health care is sought for this condition. The aim of this project was to develop a consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation and obstructed defecation. The commission presents its results in a "Question-Answer" format, including a set of graded recommendations based on a systematic review of the literature and evidence-based medicine. This section represents the consensus for the diagnosis. The history includes information relating to the onset and duration of symptoms and may reveal secondary causes of constipation. The presence of alarm symptoms and risk factors requires investigation. The physical examination should assess the presence of lesions in the anal and perianal region. The evidence does not support the routine use of blood testing and colonoscopy or barium enema for constipation. Various scoring systems are available to quantify the severity of constipation; the Constipation Severity Instrument for constipation and the obstructed defecation syndrome score for obstructed defecation are the most reliable. The Constipation-Related Quality of Life is an excellent tool for evaluating the patient's quality of life. No single test provides a pathophysiological basis for constipation. Colonic transit and anorectal manometry define the pathophysiologic subtypes. Balloon expulsion is a simple screening test for defecatory disorders, but it does not define the mechanisms. Defecography detects structural abnormalities and assesses functional parameters. Magnetic resonance imaging and/or pelvic floor sonography can further complement defecography by providing information on the movement of the pelvic floor and the organs that it supports. All these investigations are indicated to differentiate between slow transit constipation and obstructed defecation because the treatments differ between these conditions.
Topics: Chronic Disease; Constipation; Defecography; Evidence-Based Medicine; Gastrointestinal Transit; Humans; Manometry; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 22529683
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i14.1555 -
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and... Jul 2020According to the Chicago classification version 3.0, high-resolution manometry (HRM) should be performed in the supine position. However, with the patient in the...
BACKGROUND/AIMS
According to the Chicago classification version 3.0, high-resolution manometry (HRM) should be performed in the supine position. However, with the patient in the upright/sitting position, the test could more closely simulate real-life behavior and may be better tolerated. We performed a systematic review of the literature to search whether the manometric variables and the final diagnosis are affected by positional changes.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies published in English that compared HRM results in different body positions were included. Moreover, the change in diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders according to the shift of body position was investigated.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies including 1714 patients and healthy volunteers met the inclusion criteria. Six studies showed a significant increase in lower esophageal sphincter basal pressure in the supine position. Integrated relaxation pressure was significantly higher in the supine position in 10 of 13 studies. Distal contractile index was higher in the supine position in 9 out of 10 studies. One hundred and fifty-one patients (16.4%) out of 922 with normal HRM in the supine position were diagnosed with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) when the test was performed in the upright position ( < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Performing HRM in the upright position affects some variables and may change the final manometric diagnosis. Further studies to determine the normal values in the sitting position are needed.
PubMed: 32606256
DOI: 10.5056/jnm20010 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery :... Oct 2011Antireflux surgery (ARS) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most frequently performed major operations in children. Many studies have described the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Antireflux surgery (ARS) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most frequently performed major operations in children. Many studies have described the results of ARS in children, however, with a wide difference in outcome. This study aims to systematically review the efficacy of pediatric ARS and its effects on gastroesophageal function, as measured by gastroesophageal function tests. This is the first systematic review comprising only prospective, longitudinal studies, minimizing the risk of bias.
METHODS
Three electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) were searched for prospective studies reporting on ARS in children with GERD.
RESULTS
In total, 17 eligible studies were identified, reporting on a total of 1,280 children. The median success rate after ARS was 86% (57-100%). The success rate in neurologically impaired children was worse in one study, but similar in another study compared to normally developed children. Different surgical techniques (total versus partial fundoplication, or laparoscopic versus open approach) showed similar reflux recurrence rates. However, less postoperative dysphagia was observed after partial fundoplication and laparoscopic ARS was associated with less pain medication and a shorter hospital stay. Complications of ARS varied from minimal postoperative complications to severe dysphagia and gas bloating. The reflux index (RI), obtained by 24-h pH monitoring (n = 8) decreased after ARS. Manometry, as done in three studies, showed no increase in lower esophageal sphincter pressure after ARS. Gastric emptying (n = 3) was reported either unchanged or accelerated after ARS. No studies reported on barium swallow x-ray, endoscopy, or multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring before and after ARS.
CONCLUSION
ARS in children shows a good overall success rate (median 86%) in terms of complete relief of symptoms. Efficacy of ARS in neurologically impaired children may be similar to normally developed children. The outcome of ARS does not seem to be influenced by different surgical techniques, although postoperative dysphagia may occur less after partial fundoplication. However, these conclusions are bound by the lack of high-quality prospective studies on pediatric ARS. Similar studies on the effects of pediatric ARS on gastroesophageal function are also very limited. We recommend consistent use of standardized assessment tests to clarify the effects of ARS on gastroesophageal function and to identify possible risk factors for failure of ARS in children.
Topics: Age Factors; Child; Fundoplication; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 21800225
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1644-1 -
Journal of Smooth Muscle Research =... 2023Esophageal achalasia is classified into three subtypes according to manometric findings. Since several factors, including clinical characteristics and treatment...
Esophageal achalasia is classified into three subtypes according to manometric findings. Since several factors, including clinical characteristics and treatment response, have been reported to differ among the subtypes, the underlying pathogenesis may also differ. However, a comprehensive understanding regarding the differences is still lacking. We therefore performed a systematic review of the differences among the three subtypes of achalasia to clarify the current level of comprehension. In terms of clinical features, type III, which is the least frequently diagnosed of the three subtypes, showed the oldest age and most severe symptoms, such as chest pain. In contrast, type I showed a higher prevalence of lung complications, and type II showed weight loss more frequently than the other types. Histopathologically, type I showed a high loss of ganglion cells in esophagus, and on a molecular basis, type III had elevated serum pro-inflammatory cytokine levels. In addition to peristalsis and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function, the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function of achalasia has attracted attention, as an impaired UES function is associated with severe aspiration pneumonia, a fatal complication of achalasia. Previous studies have indicated that type II shows a higher UES pressure than the other subtypes, while an earlier decline in the UES function has been confirmed in type I. Differences in the treatment response are also crucial for managing achalasia patients. A number of studies have reported better responses in type II cases and less favorable responses in type III cases to pneumatic dilatation. These differences help shed light on the pathogenesis of achalasia and support its clinical management according to the subtype.
Topics: Humans; Esophageal Achalasia; Manometry; Esophageal Sphincter, Lower; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper; Chest Pain
PubMed: 36948611
DOI: 10.1540/jsmr.59.14 -
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Sep 2022Diagnosing anal incontinence (AI) based on manometry results is challenging due to the variation of the normal values and overlap between patients with and without AI.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Diagnosing anal incontinence (AI) based on manometry results is challenging due to the variation of the normal values and overlap between patients with and without AI. This study aimed to perform a systematic review on the difference in sphincter fatigability between patients with and without AI.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies were included if they included adult patients and assessed anal sphincter fatigability between using manometry. The effect size was estimated as the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals. A random-effects model was used.
RESULTS
The database searches identified 125 unique articles, and five additional articles were identified from the reference list of articles. One hundred thirteen were excluded through title and abstract review. Nine articles were included in the final analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the resting pressure between the two groups. Patients with AI had significantly lower squeeze pressure. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the fatigue rate. The FRI was significantly lower in patients with AI (SMD 1.636, p = 0.001). Approximately a third of the patients in one study were able to maintain a contraction for 20s without reducing pressure. There was significant heterogeneity in the studies. The data available were inadequate for more robust calculations.
CONCLUSIONS
Sphincter fatigability, measured by the Fatigability Rate Index, has good discriminating power for anal incontinence. A standardized protocol needs to be followed by future researchers. Graphical Abstract The analysis used six studies with 413 patients to compare Fatigue Rate Index between patients with AI and controls. All studies reported a lower FRI in patients with incontinence and the FRI was significantly lower in patients with AI (standardized mean difference [SMD] 1.636, p= 0.001). Conflicting results were reported on the correlation between FRI and AI symptom scores.
Topics: Adult; Anal Canal; Fatigue; Fecal Incontinence; Humans; Manometry
PubMed: 35246890
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14342 -
Journal of Sleep Research Dec 2022This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of home sleep apnea testing using peripheral arterial tonometry for sleep apnea as an alternative to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of home sleep apnea testing using peripheral arterial tonometry for sleep apnea as an alternative to polysomnography. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, randomized controlled trials, and diagnostic case-control studies examining the diagnostic accuracy of peripheral arterial tonometry by searching the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov databases on 5 October 2021. We assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A bivariate random-effects model was generated to derive the summary point estimates of sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals at different apnea-hypopnea index cutoffs. This meta-analysis included 13 studies (1227 participants, median prevalence of sleep apnea with apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5 events per hr: 85%). The risk of bias in the included studies was low to moderate. The pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates were 96% (95% confidence interval: 93%-97%) and 44% (95% confidence interval: 32%-56%) at apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5 events per hr, 88% (85%-91%) and 74% (63%-83%) at apnea-hypopnea index ≧ 15 events per hr, and 80% (66%-89%) and 90% (83%-95%) at apnea-hypopnea index ≧ 30 events per hr, respectively. Peripheral arterial tonometry resulted in a significant number of false negatives and false positives at any apnea-hypopnea index cutoff when applied to the median prevalence setting of the included studies. The inadequate sensitivity and specificity of peripheral arterial tonometry render it an unsuitable alternative to polysomnography for detecting sleep apnea for apnea-hypopnea index ≧ 5, 15 and 30 events per hr.
Topics: Humans; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Polysomnography; Sleep Apnea Syndromes; Sleep; Manometry
PubMed: 35793907
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13682 -
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Apr 2021Esophageal acid exposure time (AET) during 24 h pH monitoring is reproducible and predictive outcomes of treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Several small... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Esophageal acid exposure time (AET) during 24 h pH monitoring is reproducible and predictive outcomes of treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Several small Asian studies have investigated the normal range of the AET; the range may be different from that in Western populations. We evaluated its normal range in healthy Asian compared to Western subjects.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed for studies that reported pH monitoring parameters in healthy subjects. Studies that reported the AET values of healthy subjects were eligible for the analyses. The upper limit of normal of the AET was obtained from the 95th percentile of the available raw data or calculated as the mean value +2 standard deviations.
KEY RESULTS
Nineteen Asian and 49 Western studies were assessed. The estimated AET values were analyzed using a bootstrapping technique, weighted according to the sample size. The mean AET was 1.1% and 2.9% in the Asian and Western populations, respectively. The upper limit of the reference range was 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-3.9%) and 8.2 (95% CI, 6.7-9.9) in the Asian and Western populations, respectively. The normal AET differed between the Asian and Western populations because the CI of the two groups did not overlap.
CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES
The upper limit of normal of the AET in healthy Asian subjects was 3.2% (95% CI, 2.7-3.9%), which was lower than that of healthy Western subjects.
Topics: Asia; Electric Impedance; Esophageal pH Monitoring; Gastric Acid; Gastric Acidity Determination; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Germany; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Manometry; Population Surveillance; Reference Values; Turkey; United States
PubMed: 33377596
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14029 -
American Journal of Speech-language... Mar 2024The utilization of high-resolution pharyngeal manometry (HRPM) in the evaluation of pharyngeal dysphagia has been increasing; however, standardization of its use has...
PURPOSE
The utilization of high-resolution pharyngeal manometry (HRPM) in the evaluation of pharyngeal dysphagia has been increasing; however, standardization of its use has lagged behind. Without standardization using normative values, it is difficult for clinicians to adopt this emerging technology into meaningful use. Our goal is to map and compare the published normative values for common HRPM metrics in order to help establish consensus reference values.
METHOD
A systematic review was conducted on prospective and retrospective studies that included HRPM metrics, defined by an international working group consensus, in healthy adult populations. Data on the following variables were extracted when available: contractile integrals of the pharynx (PhCI), velopharynx, mesopharynx, and hypopharynx, as well as the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), relaxation time (RT), maximum admittance, and hypopharyngeal intrabolus pressure.
RESULTS
Thirty studies were included. Significant variation existed in the technique and equipment used to perform procedures between the different studies. Lower PhCIs and UES IRPs were seen in younger compared to older individuals. Higher UES RTs were found in individuals in the upright position compared to the supine position and in those using larger boluses sizes or smaller catheters.
CONCLUSIONS
Due to the wide variety of protocols, catheter configurations, manufacturers, and software used in the existing literature, it is difficult to formulate consensus on HPRM normative values using pooled data. Prospective studies adhering to standardized HRPM protocols for specific catheter configurations and manufacturers with larger cohorts of normal individuals are necessary to establish proper reference values for HRPM metrics.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24843753.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Pharynx; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Deglutition; Manometry; Esophageal Sphincter, Upper
PubMed: 38127890
DOI: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00221 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2006Because of the disability associated with surgery for anal fissure and the risk of incontinence, medical alternatives for surgery have been sought. Most recently,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Because of the disability associated with surgery for anal fissure and the risk of incontinence, medical alternatives for surgery have been sought. Most recently, pharmacologic methods that relax the anal smooth muscle, to accomplish reversibly what occurs in surgery, have been used to obtain fissure healing.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and morbidity of various medical therapies for anal fissure.
SEARCH STRATEGY
Search terms include "anal fissure randomized". Timing from 1966 to May 2006. Further details of the search below.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Studies in which participants were randomized to a non-surgical therapy for anal fissure. Comparison groups may include an operative procedure, an alternate medical therapy or placebo. Chronic fissure, acute fissure and fissure in children are included in the review. Atypical fissures associated with inflammatory bowel disease or cancer or anal infection are excluded.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data were abstracted from published reports and meeting abstracts, assessing method of randomization, blinding, "intention to treat" and drop-outs, therapies, supportive measures (applied to both groups), dosing and frequency and cross-overs. Dichotomous outcome measures included Non-healing of the fissure (a combination of persistence and recurrence), and Adverse events (including incontinence, headache, infection, anaphylaxis). Continuous outcome measures included measures of pain relief and anorectal manometry.
MAIN RESULTS
48 different comparisons of the ability of medical therapies to heal anal fissure have been reported in 53 RCTs. Eleven agents were used (nitroglycerin ointment (GTN), isosorbide dinitrate, Botulinum toxin (Botox), diltiazem, nifedipine (Calcium channel blockers or CCBs), hydrocortisone, lignocaine, bran, minoxidil, indoramin, and placebo) as well as anal dilators and surgical sphincterotomy.GTN was found to be marginally but significantly better than placebo in healing anal fissure (48.6% vs. 37%, p < 0.004), but late recurrence of fissure was common, in the range of 50% of those initially cured. Botox and CCBs were equivalent to GTN in efficacy with fewer adverse events. No medical therapy came close to the efficacy of surgical sphincterotomy, though none in these RCTs was associated with the risk of incontinence.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Medical therapy for chronic anal fissure, acute fissure and fissure in children may be applied with a chance of cure that is marginally better than placebo, and, for chronic fissure in adults, far less effective than surgery.
Topics: Fissure in Ano; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 17054170
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003431.pub2