-
The Journal of Laryngology and Otology Feb 2018Acute mastoiditis remains the commonest intratemporal complication of otitis media in the paediatric population. There has been a lack of consensus regarding the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acute mastoiditis remains the commonest intratemporal complication of otitis media in the paediatric population. There has been a lack of consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of acute mastoiditis, resulting in considerable disparity in conservative and surgical management.
OBJECTIVES
To review the current literature, proposing recommendations for the management of paediatric acute mastoiditis and appraising the treatment outcomes.
METHOD
A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases.
RESULTS
Twenty-one studies were included, with a total of 564 patients. Cure rates of medical treatment, conservative surgery and mastoidectomy were 95.9 per cent, 96.3 per cent and 89.1 per cent, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Mastoidectomy may be the most definitive treatment available; however, reviewed data suggest that conservative treatment alone has high efficacy as first-line treatment in uncomplicated cases of acute mastoiditis, and conservative therapy may be an appropriate first-line management when treating acute mastoiditis.
Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Humans; Mastoiditis; Otitis Media; Otologic Surgical Procedures; Pediatrics; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28879826
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215117001840 -
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal Apr 2022The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of treatment options for the most frequently reported complications of acute mastoiditis in the English... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of treatment options for the most frequently reported complications of acute mastoiditis in the English literature. PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched from database inception through March 29, 2019.
METHODS
Two independent reviewers (M.R.K., K.S.) evaluated search results for study inclusion. References cited in publications meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed. Twenty-three included studies were published from 1998 through 2018. Treatment efficacy was determined by comparing the change in number of complication subtypes in each treatment subgroup (medical, conservative, or surgical) from admission to discharge (range: 5-30 days) or postdischarge follow-up (range: 1-27.5 months) with a random effects model.
RESULTS
Among 733 identified articles, 23 met inclusion criteria. Of the 883 included patients, 203 were managed medically (23%), 300 conservatively (34%) and 380 surgically (43%). Conservative patients had more extracranial complications (ECC, P = 0.04) and intratemporal complications (IT, P = 0.04) at follow-up compared with medical patients. Medical patients had more total number of complications (TNC, P = 0.03), ECC (P = 0.02), and IT (P = 0.01) at discharge compared with surgical patients. Conservative patients had more of all complications except intracranial/extracranial abscess and "other" at discharge and follow-up compared with surgical patients.
CONCLUSIONS
There were larger reductions in TNC, ECC, and IT at discharge and follow-up among surgical patients compared with medical and conservative patients. There were greater reductions in TNC, ECC, IT, intracranial complications, subperiosteal abscess and lateral sinus thrombosis at discharge and follow-up among surgical patients compared with conservative patients.
Topics: Acute Disease; Aftercare; Brain Abscess; Humans; Mastoiditis; Patient Discharge
PubMed: 35175990
DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003452 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Oct 2023To assess the effect of the pneumococcal vaccine (PCV) toward the surgical management and complications of otitis media. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effect of the pneumococcal vaccine (PCV) toward the surgical management and complications of otitis media.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and clinicaltrial.gov.
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic search was performed using a combination of keywords and standardized terms about PCV and surgical management or complications of otitis media. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, studies were screened by 3 independent reviewers. Risk of bias assessment, followed by meta-analysis in only randomized-controlled trials was conducted. Vaccine efficacy (VE) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.
RESULTS
Of the 2649 abstracts reviewed, 27 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and were categorized into 6 outcomes: tympanostomy tube insertion, otitis media with effusion (OME), mastoiditis, spontaneous tympanic membrane (TM) perforation, recurrent acute otitis media (AOM), and severe AOM. Fifteen studies were included in the meta-analysis to evaluate the rate of tympanostomy tube insertion, OME, and recurrent AOM. PCV was significantly more effective in lowering the rate of tympanostomy tube insertion (VE, 22.2%; 95% CI, 14.6-29.8) and recurrent AOM (VE, 10.06%; 95% CI, 7.46-12.65) when compared with the control group, with no significant difference in reducing the incidence of OME. The qualitative analysis revealed that PCV had efficacy in preventing severe AOM and spontaneous TM perforation but the effect on mastoiditis remained unclear.
CONCLUSION
The PCV was effective in reducing the rate of tympanostomy tube insertion and the incidence of recurrent AOM with a nonsignificant effect in preventing OME in children.
Topics: Child; Humans; Infant; Pneumococcal Vaccines; Mastoiditis; Otitis Media; Otitis Media with Effusion; Middle Ear Ventilation
PubMed: 36924215
DOI: 10.1002/ohn.327 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2020Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), sometimes referred to as chronic otitis media (COM), is a chronic inflammation and often polymicrobial infection (involving more... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), sometimes referred to as chronic otitis media (COM), is a chronic inflammation and often polymicrobial infection (involving more than one micro-organism) of the middle ear and mastoid cavity, characterised by ear discharge (otorrhoea) through a perforated tympanic membrane. The predominant symptoms of CSOM are ear discharge and hearing loss. Topical antibiotics, the most common treatment for CSOM, act to kill or inhibit the growth of micro-organisms that may be responsible for the infection. Antibiotics can be used alone or in addition to other treatments for CSOM, such as antiseptics or ear cleaning (aural toileting).
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of topical antibiotics (without steroids) for people with CSOM.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL via the Cochrane Register of Studies); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 1 April 2019.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with at least a one-week follow-up involving participants (adults and children) who had chronic ear discharge of unknown cause or CSOM, where the ear discharge had continued for more than two weeks. The interventions were any single, or combination of, topical antibiotic agent(s) of any class, applied directly into the ear canal as ear drops, powders or irrigations, or as part of an aural toileting procedure. The two main comparisons were topical antibiotic compared to a) placebo or no intervention and b) another topical antibiotic (e.g. topical antibiotic A versus topical antibiotic B). Within each comparison we separated studies where both groups of participants had received topical antibiotic a) alone or with aural toileting and b) on top of background treatment (such as systemic antibiotics).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used the standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Our primary outcomes were: resolution of ear discharge or 'dry ear' (whether otoscopically confirmed or not), measured at between one week and up to two weeks, two weeks to up to four weeks and after four weeks; health-related quality of life using a validated instrument; ear pain (otalgia) or discomfort or local irritation. Secondary outcomes included hearing, serious complications and ototoxicity measured in several ways.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 17 studies with a total of 2198 participants. Twelve studies reported the sample size in terms of participants (not ears); these had a total of 1797 participants. The remaining five studies reported both the number of participants and ears, representing 401 participants, or 510 ears. A: Topical antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment (with aural toilet in both arms and no other background treatment) One small study compared a topical antibiotic (ciprofloxacin) with placebo (saline). All participants received aural toilet. Although ciprofloxacin was better than saline in terms of resolution of discharge at one to two weeks: 84% versus 12% (risk ratio (RR) 6.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82 to 24.99; 35 participants, very low-certainty evidence), the very low certainty of the evidence means that it is very uncertain whether or not one intervention is better or worse than the other. The study authors reported that "no medical side-effects and worsening of audiological measurements related to this topical medication were detected" (very low-certainty evidence). B: Topical antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment (with use of oral antibiotics in both arms) Four studies compared topical ciprofloxacin to no treatment (three studies; 190 participants) or topical ceftizoxime to no treatment (one study; 248 participants). In each study all participants received the same antibiotic systemically (oral ciprofloxacin, injected ceftizoxime). In at least one study all participants received aural toilet. Useable data were only available from the first three studies; ciprofloxacin was better than no treatment, resolution of discharge occurring in 88.2% versus 60% at one to two weeks (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.80; 2 studies, 150 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported ear pain or discomfort/local irritation. C: Comparisons of different topical antibiotics The certainty of evidence for all outcomes in these comparisons is very low. Quinolones versus aminoglycosides Seven studies compared an aminoglycoside (gentamicin, neomycin or tobramycin) with ciprofloxacin (734 participants) or ofloxacin (214 participants). Whilst resolution of discharge at one to two weeks was higher in the quinolones group the very low certainty of the evidence means that it is very uncertain whether or not one intervention is better or worse than the other (RR 1.95, 95% CI 0.88 to 4.29; 6 studies, 694 participants). One study measured ear pain and reported no difference between the groups. Quinolones versus aminoglycosides/polymyxin B combination ±gramicidin We identified three studies but data on our primary outcome were only available in one study. Comparing ciprofloxacin to a neomycin/polymyxin B/gramicidin combination, for an unknown treatment duration (likely four weeks), ciprofloxacin was better (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.22, 186 participants). A "few" patients experienced local irritation upon the first instillation of topical treatment (numbers/groups not stated). Others Other studies examined topical gentamicin versus a trimethoprim/sulphacetamide/polymixin B combination (91 participants) and rifampicin versus chloramphenicol (160 participants). Limited data were available and the findings were very uncertain.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We are uncertain about the effectiveness of topical antibiotics in improving resolution of ear discharge in patients with CSOM because of the limited amount of low-quality evidence available. However, amongst this uncertainty there is some evidence to suggest that the use of topical antibiotics may be effective when compared to placebo, or when used in addition to a systemic antibiotic. There is also uncertainty about the relative effectiveness of different types of antibiotics; it is not possible to determine with any certainty whether or not quinolones are better or worse than aminoglycosides. These two groups of compounds have different adverse effect profiles, but there is insufficient evidence from the included studies to make any comment about these. In general, adverse effects were poorly reported.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Chronic Disease; Humans; Otitis Media, Suppurative; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31896168
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013051.pub2 -
ANZ Journal of Surgery May 2022The objectives of this review are to identify the types of materials with their associated complications and respective considerations when used to obliterate the... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The objectives of this review are to identify the types of materials with their associated complications and respective considerations when used to obliterate the mastoid cavity.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases from January 2009 to January 2020 for randomized controlled trials and observational studies of patients that underwent mastoid obliteration. Studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were screened and scored according to the MINORS and relevance scores to determine final inclusion. Types of complications were grouped into minor and major complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification.
RESULTS
Two thousand five hundred and seventy-eight ears were evaluated. There were a total of 165 (7.9%) minor and 142 (6.8%) major complications in the autologous group. Overall complication rate is 14.8%. The major complications were largely recurrent and residual disease requiring revision surgery. There were 10 (18.5%) minor complications and three (5.6%) major complications in the allogenic group. The cumulative complications risk is 24%. For the synthetic group, there were 39 (8.0%) minor and 34 (7.6%) major complications. The cumulative complication rate is 16.6%.
CONCLUSION
Current evidence on materials for mastoid obliteration has been evolving. Each material has its strengths and limitations. The trend over the last decade favours the use of autologous materials. The principle of using a material remains being cautious of not reimplanting skin that can lead to the development of a cholesteatoma. The choice of materials is dependent on patient factors as well as the surgeons' preference and experience.
Topics: Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear; Humans; Mastoid; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Transplantation, Autologous
PubMed: 35191151
DOI: 10.1111/ans.17563 -
JAMA Otolaryngology-- Head & Neck... Oct 2020Subtotal petrosectomy (STP) has been more frequently performed to prepare ears with unfavorable conditions for cochlear implantation.
IMPORTANCE
Subtotal petrosectomy (STP) has been more frequently performed to prepare ears with unfavorable conditions for cochlear implantation.
OBJECTIVES
To provide an overview of indications for and complications of STP and cochlear implantation and to compare outcomes between single vs multistage procedures and between pediatric vs adult populations.
DATA SOURCES
A search of PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library was performed from the databases' inception to January 23, 2020, for studies evaluating STP for cochlear implantation.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies with a minimum follow-up of 3 months and no missing data regarding postoperative outcomes were included. Of the initial 570 studies identified, 27 (4.7%) met selection criteria.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines; discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. Extracted data included patient demographics, indications for STP, rates of complications, and cholesteatoma recidivism when applicable. Data were pooled using a random- or a fixed-effects model when appropriate.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary study outcome was rate of global complications stratified by patient- and surgery-level characteristics.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven unique studies with 377 unique patients (54.2% male; mean age, 50.6 [range, 1-99] years) undergoing 397 STP procedures and cochlear implantation were included. Of these procedures, 299 of 394 cases with the information reported (75.9%) were single procedures and 95 (24.1%) were multistage procedures. Of the total 397 STP procedures, most common indications included chronic otitis media (220 cases [55.4%]), previous open mastoid cavity (141 [35.5%]), cholesteatoma (74 [18.6%]), and cochlear ossification (29 [7.3%]). The overall complication rate was 12.4% (95% CI, 9.4%-15.9%); overall cholesteatoma recidivism rate was 9.3% (95% CI, 4.3%-17.1%). Complication rates did not significantly differ based on stage or age of patients. Cases with cholesteatoma more often underwent multistage vs single-stage procedures (23 of 54 [42.6%] vs 35 of 174 [20.1%]).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Across all age groups, STP has been shown to be an effective surgical operation in preparing an ear with unfavorable conditions for cochlear implantation. The potential indications for which cochlear implantation can be performed have expanded with the use of STP. Presence of cholesteatoma might indicate that a multistage procedure should be performed. Lastly, with complication rates comparable to those in adult patients, STP can be considered in children requiring cochlear implantation to minimize ear-related issues and allow benefit from cochlear implantation.
PubMed: 33057602
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3380 -
The Laryngoscope Jun 2023Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of mastoid obliteration compared to the canal wall up (CWU) technique in cholesteatoma surgery based on the systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of mastoid obliteration compared to the canal wall up (CWU) technique in cholesteatoma surgery based on the systematic review of the literature and the meta-analysis of the data.
METHODS
The systematic search was performed in four major databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and CENTRAL) on October 14, 2021. Studies comparing the CWU technique and mastoid obliteration were included. The exclusion criteria were less than 12 months follow-up, congenital cholesteatoma, indefinite description of the surgical method, and animal studies. The protocol was registered on Prospero (registration number: CRD42021282485). The risk of bias was evaluated with the ROBINS-I tool. Residual and recurrent disease proportions as primary outcomes, quality of life, ear discharge, infection rates, hearing results, and operation time as secondary outcomes were analyzed. In the quantitative synthesis, the random effect model was used, and heterogeneity was identified.
RESULTS
A total of 11 articles with 2077 operations' data were found eligible. All the identified studies were retrospective cohorts. The odds of pooled residual and recurrent disease proportion were significantly lower in the obliteration group compared to CWU (OR = 0.45, CI:0.28;0.80, p = 0.014). However, when separated, the proportion of ears with recurrent (OR = 0.41, CI:0.11;1.57, p = 0.140) or residual (OR = 0.59, CI:0.23, 1.50, p = 0.207) disease did not show a significant difference, even though the odds were quite similar. The qualitative synthesis identified no significant difference in the secondary outcomes, but obliteration elongated the operation time.
CONCLUSION
Mastoid obliteration significantly decreased the proportion of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma in pooled analyses compared to the CWU technique with low-quality of data.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
NA Laryngoscope, 133:1297-1305, 2023.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Mastoid; Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear; Quality of Life; Tympanoplasty; Neoplasm, Residual; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36169349
DOI: 10.1002/lary.30413 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Apr 2016The mastoidectomy with facial recess approach (MFRA) is considered the reference standard for cochlear implantation. The suprameatal approach (SMA) was developed more... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The mastoidectomy with facial recess approach (MFRA) is considered the reference standard for cochlear implantation. The suprameatal approach (SMA) was developed more recently and does not require mastoidectomy, which could influence postoperative outcomes. We aim to identify the optimal operative approach for cochlear implantation based on postoperative complications and hearing preservation in children and adults.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
REVIEW METHODS
Studies comparing MFRA and SMA in children and adults were eligible for inclusion. Original reports with moderate relevance and validity were included. Relevance and validity were assessed with a self-modified critical appraisal tool. This review was reported in accordance to PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
We retrieved 294 citations. Only retrospective nonrandomized studies were identified (level III evidence). Six articles were selected for full-text inclusion and 4 articles for data extraction. No article found a significant difference between MFRA and SMA with respect to postoperative complications in children and adults. One study found a significantly (P < .023) higher pediatric MFRA mastoiditis rate; however, meta-analysis did not indicate an overall effect. Hearing preservation was reported only in adults, and outcomes between techniques did not differ.
CONCLUSION
No evidence was noted for lower complication rates or improved hearing preservation between the MFRA and SMA for cochlear implantation in children and adults. Pediatric data were available for children implanted above the age of 24 months only. Level I evidence is needed to resolve the uncertainty regarding differences in postoperative outcomes of pediatric and adult MFRA and SMA.
Topics: Adult; Child; Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 26884363
DOI: 10.1177/0194599815627146 -
European Archives of... Dec 2021The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review of the literature about the etiology, clinical and radiological presentation, surgical management, and outcomes... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review of the literature about the etiology, clinical and radiological presentation, surgical management, and outcomes of pneumolabyrinth (PNL).
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed including studies published up to September 2020 in electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus). The PRISMA standard was applied to identify English, Italian, or French-language studies mentioning PNL. Full texts lacking information on the etiology were excluded. Data concerning the cause, site of air bubbles/fistula, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome were collected. A qualitative synthesis of the results was performed.
RESULTS
Seventy-eight articles were eventually included; 132 patients were involved in the qualitative synthesis. The most common causes were: stapes surgery (24/132, 18.2%), temporal bone fracture (42/132, 31.8%), head trauma without temporal bone fracture (19/132, 14.4%), penetrating trauma (21/132, 15.9%), and barotrauma (15/132, 11.4%). The site most commonly involved was the vestibule (102/107, 95.3%), followed by cochlea (43/107, 40.2%) and semicircular canals (25/107, 23.4%).
CONCLUSION
The etiopathogenesis of PNL can be summarized in traumatic, iatrogenic, or inflammatory/infective. Its management consists in exploratory tympanotomy and sealing the fistula, but also conservative treatments can be attempted. Vestibular symptoms disappear in the majority of cases. Instead, the prognosis of hearing function is widely variable, and complete recovery is less probable. The certainty of evidence is still too low to make it useful for clinical decision-making.
Topics: Cochlea; Craniocerebral Trauma; Humans; Semicircular Canals; Stapes Surgery; Vestibule, Labyrinth
PubMed: 33881577
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06827-0 -
Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) Apr 2022Bezold's abscess is a deep neck abscess related to otomastoiditis. Due to the insidious clinical presentation, diagnosis can be extremely challenging, leading to delays... (Review)
Review
Bezold's abscess is a deep neck abscess related to otomastoiditis. Due to the insidious clinical presentation, diagnosis can be extremely challenging, leading to delays in treatment and possible life-threatening complications. The literature currently provides a fragmented picture, presenting only single or small number of cases. The present study aims at examining our experience and the literature findings (based on PRISMA criteria) of 97 patients with Bezold's abscess, summarizing their epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, imaging findings, and treatments. Bezold's abscess is found at any age, with overt male prevalence among adults. The clinical presentation, as well as the causative pathogens, are strikingly heterogeneous. Otomastoiditis and cholesteatoma are major risk factors. A clinical history of otitis is commonly reported (43%). CT and MRI are the main diagnostic tools, proving the erosion of the mastoid tip in 53% of patients and the presence of a concomitant cholesteatoma in 40%. Intracranial vascular (24%) or infectious (9%) complications have also been reported. Diagnosis might be easily achieved when imaging (CT) is properly applied. MRI has a limited diagnostic role, but it might be crucial whenever intracranial complications or the coexistence of cholesteatoma are suspected, helping to develop proper treatment (prompt antibiotic therapy and surgery).
Topics: Abscess; Adult; Cholesteatoma; Humans; Male; Mastoid; Mastoiditis; Neck
PubMed: 35448708
DOI: 10.3390/tomography8020074