-
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience :... May 2024Facial nerve hemangiomas (FNHs) are rare tumors that primarily occur near the geniculate ganglion in the temporal bone. Despite their rarity, they can cause significant... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Facial nerve hemangiomas (FNHs) are rare tumors that primarily occur near the geniculate ganglion in the temporal bone. Despite their rarity, they can cause significant facial nerve dysfunction. The optimal management approach for FNHs remains uncertain, with surgery being the mainstay but subject to debate regarding the extent of resection and preservation of the facial nerve.
METHODS
Systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We queried the PubMed/Medline (accessed on 5 March 2024) electronic database using combinations of the following search terms and words text: "geniculate ganglion hemangioma", "ganglional hemangioma", "hemangioma of the facial nerve", "facial hemangioma", and "intratemporal hemangioma".
RESULTS
We identified a total of 30 literatures (321 patients). The most common site involved for the facial nerve hemangioma was the geniculate ganglion area followed by internal auditory canal, tympanic segment, labyrinthine segment and mastoid involvement. All patients were treated with conservative management or surgery. We report a 48-year-old female patient with HB grade 2 facial palsy and hemifacial spasm underwent SRS using Cyberknife technology. The treatment targeted the FNH in the left internal acoustic canal near the geniculate ganglion. Six months post-treatment, clinical improvement was evident, and lesion control was confirmed in a follow-up brain MRI.
CONCLUSION
The rarity of FNHs contributes to the lack of consensus on optimal management. This illustrative case demonstrates the feasibility of SRS as a standalone treatment for FNHs.
PubMed: 38823231
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.05.023 -
World Neurosurgery Jun 2021IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is an inflammatory process that uncommonly can present in the skull base and calvarium and mimic a tumor but the nature of this condition...
OBJECTIVE
IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is an inflammatory process that uncommonly can present in the skull base and calvarium and mimic a tumor but the nature of this condition is not well summarized in the neurosurgical literature.
METHODS
A review was performed of 2 cases of IgG4-RD in the skull base highlighting the diagnostic challenges with assessment of these skull base lesions, and a systematic review of relevant literature was carried out.
RESULTS
A systematic review of the literature conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines identified 113 articles, with 184 cases of IgG4-RD in the skull base or calvarium. The most commonly affected locations include the meninges, cavernous sinus, base of the posterior fossa, clivus, and mastoid bone. Headache, visual and auditory disturbances, cranial nerve dysfunction, and seizures were the most common presenting symptoms. Medical treatment was highly successful and most commonly consisted of corticosteroids coadministered with immunosuppressive agents such as rituximab. Prevalence seemed to be equal between sexes, and serum IgG4 levels were increased in 61% of patients. Delayed diagnosis and a need for multiple biopsies were reported in numerous cases. Two cases of skull base IgG4-RD from the authors' institution show the variable presentations of this disease. More invasive surgical biopsies were required in both cases, and corticosteroid treatment led to significant clinical improvement.
CONCLUSIONS
IgG4-RD is an uncommon condition with an increasing body of reported cases that can affect the skull base and calvarium and should be in the differential diagnosis, because delay in diagnosis and treatment may be common.
Topics: Brain; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease; Middle Aged; Skull Base; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33746107
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.054 -
Otology & Neurotology : Official... Apr 2024To determine if cochlear implant (CI) is safe and effective in patients with radiation therapy (XRT)-induced sensorineural hearing loss and to discuss considerations in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To determine if cochlear implant (CI) is safe and effective in patients with radiation therapy (XRT)-induced sensorineural hearing loss and to discuss considerations in this population through a retrospective cohort review, systematic review, and meta-analysis.
DATABASES REVIEWED
PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed all CI cases after head and neck (HN) XRT at our institution, noting intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and hearing outcomes. Change in speech discrimination scores (SDSs) was the primary outcome measure. Systematic review was performed to identify all cases of CI after HNXRT. A meta-analysis was performed to assess SDS change.
RESULTS
The retrospective cohort review identified 12 patients who underwent CI after HNXRT. One patient with HN cancer (HNC) and one with central nervous system pathology (CNSP) received bilateral implants. Six had HNC, three had CNSP, and one had Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Eleven had abnormal findings during CI. There were no postoperative complications. Twenty articles with an additional 97 patients were suitable for systematic review inclusion. Of the 109 patients, 67 (61.5%) had HNC and 18 (16.5%) had CNSP. Abnormal intraoperative findings were common (30.3%), most frequently in the mastoid (66.7%). Postoperative complications, including wound dehiscence and infection with some requiring explantation, occurred in 10.1% of patients. Sixty-six patients were included in the meta-analysis. All demonstrated SDS improvement (mean increase, 56.2%).
CONCLUSION
Patients with prior HNXRT benefit from CI. Paying careful attention to surgical planning and technique, postoperative care, and patient expectations is imperative, as complications are not uncommon.
Topics: Humans; Cochlear Implantation; Retrospective Studies; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; Cochlear Implants; Postoperative Complications; Speech Perception
PubMed: 38361317
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004127 -
The Laryngoscope Mar 2019There is no standard of care for treatment of pediatric acute mastoiditis (PAM). We systematically reviewed the English literature to evaluate the efficacy of PAM... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE
There is no standard of care for treatment of pediatric acute mastoiditis (PAM). We systematically reviewed the English literature to evaluate the efficacy of PAM treatment options.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 2016, along with manual bibliography searches, for studies describing surgical or medical therapy. Two independent evaluators reviewed each abstract and article.
RESULTS
We identified 310 articles, and 55 met inclusion criteria. Thirty-three evaluated surgical options and included 2,930 patients (mean age = 2.8 years) including those with myringotomy ± tube placement (n = 920); 140 needed additional surgery, drainage of subperisoteal abscess (SPA) (n = 142) ± myringotomy or tube placement, 29 patients needed additional surgery and mastoidectomy ± myringotomy or tube placement (n = 612), with 611 reporting resolution. Using a random effects model, the estimated success probability with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are myringotomy ± tube placement 94% (95% CI: 84.5%-97.8%), and drainage of subperiosteal abscess with concurrent myringotomy ± tube placement was 86.5% (95% CI: 66.4%-95.4%). Using a random effects model, mastoidectomy success was 99.7% (95% CI: 77.5%-100%). Nineteen studies evaluated medical therapy (n = 990 patients). The average cure rate was 71.7% (median = 70%; range, 26.3%-100%), and estimated success was 72.9% (95% CI: 60.5%-82.5%) by meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Myringotomy with or without tube placement and mastoidectomy have the highest cure rates for PAM. With SPA, incision and drainage with myringotomy with or without tube can be considered. Medical treatment cured nearly 72% of children. Ultimately, management should be based on surgeons' experience and judgment, patient characteristics, and severity of disease. Laryngoscope, 129:754-760, 2019.
Topics: Acute Disease; Child; Humans; Mastoiditis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30284265
DOI: 10.1002/lary.27462 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2013This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 1, 2010.Ménière's disease is characterised by three major symptoms: vertigo,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 1, 2010.Ménière's disease is characterised by three major symptoms: vertigo, deafness, and tinnitus or aural fullness, all of which are discontinuous and variable in intensity. A number of surgical modalities, of varying levels of invasiveness, have been developed to reduce the symptoms of Ménière's disease, but it is not clear whether or not these are effective.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness of surgical options for the treatment of Ménière's disease. All surgical interventions used in the treatment of Ménière's disease, either to alter the natural history of the disease or to abolish vestibular function, were considered for this review.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; BIOSIS Previews; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the most recent search was 7 November 2012.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled studies of a surgical modality versus a placebo therapy in Ménière's disease.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for further information.
MAIN RESULTS
The only surgical intervention which has been evaluated in randomised controlled trials and met the inclusion criteria was endolymphatic sac surgery. We identified two randomised trials, involving a total of 59 patients; one comparing endolymphatic sac surgery with ventilation tubes and one with simple mastoidectomy. Neither study reported any beneficial effect of surgery either in comparison to placebo surgery or grommet insertion.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The two trials included in this review provide insufficient evidence of the beneficial effect of endolymphatic sac surgery in Ménière's disease.
Topics: Endolymphatic Sac; Humans; Mastoid; Meniere Disease; Middle Ear Ventilation; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 23450562
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005395.pub3 -
Journal of Infection in Developing... Jan 2014Zoonoses are infections transmitted from animal to man, either directly (through direct contact or contact with animal products) or indirectly (through an intermediate... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Zoonoses are infections transmitted from animal to man, either directly (through direct contact or contact with animal products) or indirectly (through an intermediate vector, such as an arthropod). The causative agents include bacteria, parasites, viruses, and fungi. The purpose of this review is to make an accurate examination of all zoonotic diseases that can be responsible of ear, nose, and throat (ENT) involvement.
METHODOLOGY
A PubMed search was performed combining the terms (otorhinolaryngology OR rhinology OR laryngology OR otology OR mastoiditis OR otitis OR sinusitis OR laryngitis OR rhinitis OR pharyngitis OR epiglottitis OR dysphonia OR ear OR larynx OR nose OR pharynx) with each one of the etiological agents of zoonoses for the period between January 1997 and August 2012 without language restrictions.
RESULTS
A total of 164 articles were selected and examined. Larynx was the most commonly involved ENT organ, followed by oral cavity, pharynx, and neck. Bacteria were the most representative microorganisms involved. Nose and major salivary glands were affected most frequently by protozoa; paranasal sinus, oral cavity, ear, neck, nerves and upper airway by bacteria; and larynx by fungi.
CONCLUSIONS
ENT symptoms and signs may be present in many zoonotic diseases, some of which are also present in industrialized countries. Most zoonotic diseases are not commonly encountered by ENT specialists. Appreciation of the possible occurrence of these diseases is important for a correct microbiological approach, which often requires special culture media and diagnostic techniques.
Topics: Animals; Ear Diseases; Humans; Nose Diseases; Pharyngeal Diseases; Zoonoses
PubMed: 24423708
DOI: 10.3855/jidc.4206 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2010Ménière's disease is characterised by three major symptoms: vertigo, deafness, and tinnitus or aural fullness, all of which are discontinuous and variable in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Ménière's disease is characterised by three major symptoms: vertigo, deafness, and tinnitus or aural fullness, all of which are discontinuous and variable in intensity. A number of surgical modalities, of varying levels of invasiveness, have been developed to reduce the symptoms of Ménière's disease, but it is not clear whether or not these are effective.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness of surgical options for the treatment of Ménière's disease. All surgical interventions used in the treatment of Ménière's disease, either to alter the natural history of the disease or to abolish vestibular function, were considered for this review.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; BIOSIS Previews; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; mRCT and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the most recent search was 25 February 2009.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled studies of a surgical modality versus a placebo therapy in Ménière's disease.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for further information.
MAIN RESULTS
The only surgical intervention which has been evaluated in randomised controlled trials and met the inclusion criteria was endolymphatic sac surgery. We identified two randomised trials, involving a total of 59 patients; one comparing endolymphatic sac surgery with ventilation tubes and one with simple mastoidectomy. Neither study reported any beneficial effect of surgery either in comparison to placebo surgery or grommet insertion.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The two trials included in this review provide insufficient evidence of the beneficial effect of endolymphatic sac surgery in Ménière's disease.
Topics: Endolymphatic Sac; Humans; Mastoid; Meniere Disease; Middle Ear Ventilation; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 20091573
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005395.pub2 -
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck... Feb 2021Noise in operating rooms (OR) can have negative effects on both patients and surgical care workers. Noise can also impact surgical performance, team communication, and...
OBJECTIVE
Noise in operating rooms (OR) can have negative effects on both patients and surgical care workers. Noise can also impact surgical performance, team communication, and patient outcomes. Such implications of noise have been studied in orthopedics, neurosurgery, and urology. High noise levels have also been demonstrated in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) procedures. Despite this, no previous study has amalgamated the data on noise across all OHNS ORs to determine how much noise is present during OHNS surgeries. This study aims to review all the literature on noise associated with OHNS ORs and procedures.
METHODS
Ovid Medline, EMBASE Classic, Pubmed, SCOPUS and Cochrane databases were searched following PRISMA guidelines. Data was collected on noise measurement location and surgery type. Descriptive results and statistical analysis were completed using Stata.
RESULTS
This search identified 2914 articles. Final inclusion consisted of 22 studies. The majority of articles analyzed noise level exposures during mastoid surgery (18/22, 82%). The maximum noise level across all OHNS ORs and OHNS cadaver studies were 95.5 a-weighted decibels (dBA) and 106.6 c-weighted decibels (dBC), respectively (P = 0.2068). The mean noise level across all studies was significantly higher in OHNS cadaver labs (96.9 dBA) compared to OHNS ORs (70.1 dBA) (P = 0.0038). When analyzed together, the mean noise levels were 84.9 dBA.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review demonstrates that noise exposure in OHNS surgery exceeds safety thresholds. Further research is needed to understand how noise may affect team communication, surgical performance and patient outcomes in OHNS ORs.
Topics: Humans; Mastoid; Noise, Occupational; Occupational Exposure; Operating Rooms; Otolaryngology; Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures; Safety Management
PubMed: 33573705
DOI: 10.1186/s40463-020-00487-6 -
Journal of Neurosurgery Apr 2015Dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) of the hypoglossal canal (HCDAVFs) are rare and display a complex angiographic anatomy. Hitherto, they have been referred to as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) of the hypoglossal canal (HCDAVFs) are rare and display a complex angiographic anatomy. Hitherto, they have been referred to as various entities (for example, "marginal sinus DAVFs") solely described in case reports or small series. In this in-depth review of HCDAVF, the authors describe clinical and imaging findings, as well as treatment strategies and subsequent outcomes, based on a systematic literature review supplemented by their own cases (120 cases total). Further, the involved craniocervical venous anatomy with variable venous anastomoses is summarized. Hypoglossal canal DAVFs consist of a fistulous pouch involving the anterior condylar confluence and/or anterior condylar vein with a variable intraosseous component. Three major types of venous drainage are associated with distinct clinical patterns: Type 1, with anterograde drainage (62.5%), mostly presents with pulsatile tinnitus; Type 2, with retrograde drainage to the cavernous sinus and/or orbital veins (23.3%), is associated with ocular symptoms and may mimic cavernous sinus DAVF; and Type 3, with cortical and/or perimedullary drainage (14.2%), presents with either hemorrhage or cervical myelopathy. For Types 1 and 2 HCDAVF, transvenous embolization demonstrates high safety and efficacy (2.9% morbidity, 92.7% total occlusion). Understanding the complex venous anatomy is crucial for planning alternative approaches if standard transjugular access is impossible. Transarterial embolization or surgical disconnection (morbidity 13.3%-16.7%) should be reserved for Type 3 HCDAVFs or lesions with poor venous access. A conservative strategy could be appropriate in Type 1 HCDAVF for which spontaneous regression (5.8%) may be observed.
Topics: Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations; Cerebral Angiography; Drainage; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Occipital Bone
PubMed: 25415064
DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS14377 -
Auris, Nasus, Larynx Oct 2023Canal wall up (CWU) and canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomies represent the most common cholesteatoma surgical techniques. In this meta-analysis, we compare the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Canal wall up (CWU) and canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomies represent the most common cholesteatoma surgical techniques. In this meta-analysis, we compare the postoperative quality of life (QoL) in patients treated with either CWU or CWD mastoidectomy.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted in the following three electronic databases: Medline/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Articles were assessed for eligibility in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and data were extracted independently by two authors. Biases assessment was conducted for each study according to the Methodological Items for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. Meta-analysis was performed for postoperative QoL following CWU versus CWD mastoidectomy.
RESULTS
Our systematic review included four studies that met the inclusion criteria, three prospective cohort studies, and one retrospective cohort study. The meta-analysis did not favor treatment with one of the two surgical techniques. Postoperative QoL did not show a statistically significant difference between CWU and CWD mastoidectomies (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION
Our systematic review and meta-analysis results indicate that QoL is not statistically significantly better among patients who underwent CWU mastoidectomies when compared with CWD. The trend of selecting CWU over CWD mastoidectomies in selected cases - for QoL purposes - is not always based on evidence-based data. The statistically insignificant difference between the two surgical techniques suggests that an initial more radical approach might prevent patients from further surgeries, without affecting postoperative QoL.
Topics: Humans; Mastoid; Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear; Quality of Life; Ear Canal; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36746693
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2023.01.008