-
ANZ Journal of Surgery Apr 2023Acute Mesenteric Ischaemic (AMI) is a rare condition with significant morbidity and mortality. Many causes of AMI exist, which usually begin with mucosal injury. Onset... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acute Mesenteric Ischaemic (AMI) is a rare condition with significant morbidity and mortality. Many causes of AMI exist, which usually begin with mucosal injury. Onset is insiduous and there is frequent diagnostic delay. Current treatments can only control established injury and prevent propagation, hence new interventions are needed. The prevention and treatment of AMI by intraluminal delivery of oxygen has yet to be investigated in the clinical setting. This article aims to systemically review experimental studies investigating this novel therapy.
METHODS
Following the PRISMA guidelines, searches of PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE databases were performed up to June 2022. Two independent investigators extracted the data.
RESULTS
There were 20 experimental studies, 16 of which used an occlusive ischaemia reperfusion model. Six different formulations were used to deliver intraluminal oxygen, with perflurocarbon being the most common. Studies consistently showed local and systemic benefits. Intraluminal oxygen therapy improved histological severity of mucosal injury in all studies when oxygen was delivered during the ischaemia phase, but could cause harm if given during the reperfusion phase. Improvement was also demonstrated in endpoints assessing intestinal function, biomarkers of intestinal damage, measures of systemic physiological derangement and mortality.
CONCLUSION
Intraluminal oxygenation appears to be an effective treatment for AMI. There remain significant questions regarding optimal timing and delivery formulation before clinical translation of this treatment strategy.
Topics: Humans; Animals; Mesenteric Ischemia; Oxygen; Delayed Diagnosis; Mesentery; Ischemia
PubMed: 36537566
DOI: 10.1111/ans.18211 -
Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.) Oct 2023Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (SI-NETs) are the most common small intestinal tumours. A particularly challenging subset of these tumours is those that involve... (Review)
Review
Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (SI-NETs) are the most common small intestinal tumours. A particularly challenging subset of these tumours is those that involve the superior mesenteric artery or vein for which the role and feasibility of surgery are often questioned. This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate the management strategies used for these complex SI-NETs. The identified studies showed positive outcomes with surgery and multimodality therapy.
Topics: Humans; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Intestine, Small; Intestinal Neoplasms
PubMed: 37887564
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30100664 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Jul 2016Several studies report improved survival in colon cancer with use of extended lymphadenectomy techniques (ELTs), such as D3 lymphadenectomy or complete mesocolic... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
Several studies report improved survival in colon cancer with use of extended lymphadenectomy techniques (ELTs), such as D3 lymphadenectomy or complete mesocolic excision. The noninferiority of laparoscopic versus open techniques has already been established in D2 resections. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of open and laparoscopic approaches for ELTs in colon cancer.
METHOD
Major databases, including PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane library, were searched using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and relevant data were extracted. The Cochrane and Newcastle-Ottawa tools were used for critical appraisal and quality assessment. Meta-analysis with various subgroup analyses were undertaken, and clinical and statistical heterogeneity, along with publication bias, were also assessed.
RESULTS
One randomized and seven case-control trials were included. All studies were found to be of low methodological quality with some external validity issues. There was no difference in short-term mortality [OR = 2.16 (95% CI: 0.73-6.41); P = 0.16], anastomotic leakage, ileus or deep-sited infection/abscess. There was a trend for longer operative time [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -30.88 (95% CI: -62.38 to 0.61); P = 0.05] and shorter length of hospital stay [WMD = 2.29 (95% CI: -0.39 to 4.98); P = 0.09] with the laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy had a lower wound-infection rate [OR = 2.87 (95% CI: 1.38-5.98); P = 0.005] compared with the relevant open group. No statistically significant difference was found in overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.69-1.06); P = 0.15], disease-free survival, local recurrence and distant metastases.
CONCLUSION
Based on the current evidence, the laparoscopic technique appears to be at least as safe as the open technique when used in performing ELTs for colonic cancer, with similar morbidity and oncological outcomes.
Topics: Aged; Anastomotic Leak; Case-Control Studies; Colectomy; Colonic Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Lymph Node Excision; Male; Mesocolon; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Operative Time; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27187520
DOI: 10.1111/codi.13385 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Jan 2024In this review, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of ultrasound for assessing the tumor spread in the abdomen in women with ovarian cancer. A search for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
In this review, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of ultrasound for assessing the tumor spread in the abdomen in women with ovarian cancer. A search for studies evaluating the role of ultrasound for assessing intrabdominal tumor spread in women with ovarian cancer compared to surgery from January 2011 to March 2023 was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 evaluated the quality of the studies (QUADAS-2). All analyses were performed using MIDAS and METANDI commands in STATA 12.0 software. We identified 1552 citations. After exclusions, five studies comprising 822 women were included. Quality of studies were considered as good, except for patient selection as all studies were considered as having high risk of bias. The pooled sensitivity and specificity could be calculated for three anatomical areas (recto-sigma, major omentum and root of mesentery) and the presence of ascites. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting disease in the recto-sigma, major omentum and root of mesentery were 0.83 and 0.95, 0.87 and 0.87, and 0.29 and 0.99, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting ascites was 0.95 and 0.91, respectively. There is evidence that ultrasound offers good diagnostic performance for evaluating the intra-abdominal extent of disease in women with suspected ovarian cancer.
Topics: Female; Humans; Ascites; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ultrasonography; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 38042117
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.11.017 -
Medicine Apr 2022Mesenteric panniculitis (MP) is a non-specific, localized inflammation at the mesentery of small intestines which often gets detected on computed tomography. An... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Mesenteric panniculitis (MP) is a non-specific, localized inflammation at the mesentery of small intestines which often gets detected on computed tomography. An association with malignant neoplasms remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association of malignancy with MP.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles published from inception to 2020 that evaluated the association of malignant neoplasms with MP in comparison with control groups. Using random-effects method, a summary odds ratio (OR) estimate with 95% confidence intervals for malignant neoplasms in MP was estimated.
RESULTS
Four case-control studies reporting data on 415 MP patients against 1132 matched-controls met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The pooled OR for finding a malignant neoplasm in patients with MP was 0.907 (95% CI: 0.688-1.196; P = .489). The heterogeneity was mild and non-significant. Also, there was no heightened risk of any specific type of malignancy with MP. Three more case-series with unmatched-control groups (MP: 282, unmatched-controls: 17,691) were included in a separate analysis where the pooled OR of finding a malignant neoplasm was 2.963 (95% CI: 1.434-6.121; P = .003). There was substantial heterogeneity in this group.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis of matched controlled studies proves absence of any significant association of malignant neoplasms with MP. Our study also demonstrates that the putative association of malignancy with MP is mainly driven by uncontrolled studies or case-series.
Topics: Databases, Factual; Humans; Mesentery; Neoplasms; Panniculitis, Peritoneal; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 35512070
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029143 -
Surgical Endoscopy Jan 2019Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is advocated based on oncologic superiority, but not commonly performed in North America. Many data are case series with few...
Comparison between conventional colectomy and complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a systematic review and pooled analysis : A review of CME versus conventional colectomies.
BACKGROUND
Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is advocated based on oncologic superiority, but not commonly performed in North America. Many data are case series with few comparative studies. Our aim was to perform a systematic review comparing outcomes between CME and non-CME colectomy.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines of MEDLINE, EMBASE, HealthStar, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Studies were included if they compared conventional resection (non-CME) to CME for colon cancer. Quality was assessed using methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). The main outcome measures were short-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes. Weighted pooled means and proportions with 95% CI were calculated using a random-effects model when appropriate.
RESULTS
Out of 825 unique citations, 23 studies underwent full-text reviews and 14 met inclusion criteria. Mean MINORS score was 13.3 (range 11-15). The mean sample size in CME group was 1166 (range 45-3756) and 945 (range 40-3425) in non-CME. Four papers reported plane of dissection, with CME plane achieved in 85.8% (95% CI 79.8-91.7). Mean OR time in CME group was 167 min (163-171) and 138 min (135-142) in conventional group. Perioperative morbidity was reported in six studies, with pooled overall complications of 22.5% (95% CI 18.4-26.6) for CME and 19.6 (95% CI 13.6-25.5) for non-CME. Anastomotic leak occurred in 6.0% (95% CI 2.2-9.7) of CME resections versus 6.0% (95% CI 4.1-7.9) in non-CME. CME had more lymph nodes, longer distance to high tie, and specimen length in all studies. Nine studies compared long-term oncologic outcomes and only three reported statistically significant higher disease-free or overall survival in favor of CME. Local recurrence was lower after CME in two of four studies.
CONCLUSIONS
The quality of evidence is limited and does not consistently support the superiority of CME. Better data are needed before CME can be recommended as the standard of care for colon cancer resections.
Topics: Anastomotic Leak; Colectomy; Colonic Neoplasms; Humans; Laparoscopy; Lymph Nodes; Mesocolon; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; North America
PubMed: 30209606
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6419-2 -
Medicine May 2016Calcifying fibrous tumor (CFT) is a benign lesion characterized by its specific histological findings and is found as solitary or multiple lesions in several locations... (Review)
Review
Calcifying fibrous tumor (CFT) is a benign lesion characterized by its specific histological findings and is found as solitary or multiple lesions in several locations of the human body. The aim of the present systematic review is to give a detailed account of all reported cases of CFT in the literature and to analyze the available data, to completely characterize the entity from epidemiological, medical, and surgical aspects.A bibliographic research was performed from 1988 until 2015. A database with the patients' characteristics was made, including sex, age, location of the tumor, symptoms, symptoms duration, size of the tumor, diagnostic methods, treatment, metastasis, and follow-up.A total of 104 articles were identified, reporting 157 cases of CFT. Mean age of patients was 33.58 years and the ratio between men and women was 1:1.27. The most common locations of CFT were stomach (18%), small intestine (8.7%), pleura (9.9%), mesentery (5%), and peritoneum (6.8%). Mean diameter of the tumor was estimated 4.6 cm. The correlations proceeded showed that as age increases, size decreases (P = 0.001) and that the tumor is larger in females (P = 0.027). Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the larger tumors appear in the neck and adrenal gland (P = 0.001). The percentage of asymptomatic patients was 30.57%. Computed tomography and biopsy were the most common tests for the diagnosis of CFT. Open surgical procedure was performed in the majority of cases. The median hospitalization was 6.06 days and the mean follow-up period was 29.97 months. Recurrences were mentioned in 10 of 96 patients with available data. No deaths owing to CFT were mentioned in the literature.CFT should be included in the differential diagnosis of enlarging mass revealed by clinical or imaging examination either incidentally or after specific acute or chronic symptomatology.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Calcinosis; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Fibrous Tissue; Sex Factors; Tumor Burden; Young Adult
PubMed: 27196478
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003690 -
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy &... Aug 2020Complete mesocolic excision (CME) emphasizes sharp dissection along the mesocolon plane and ligation of the supplying vessels at their origin. Although laparoscopic CME... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Complete mesocolic excision (CME) emphasizes sharp dissection along the mesocolon plane and ligation of the supplying vessels at their origin. Although laparoscopic CME is reported to be feasible and safe, the benefit of laparoscopic CME over noncomplete mesocolic excision (NCME) remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety, quality, and effect of laparoscopic CME with NCME.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature search with no limits was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science on March 27, 2020. Studies comparing laparoscopic CME with NCME were enrolled. Outcomes of interests included intraoperative, pathologic, postoperative, and survival outcomes.
RESULTS
Seven studies (5 articles and 2 conference abstracts) published between 2015 and 2020 with a total of 1595 patients (742 by CME and 853 by NCME) were enrolled. Compared with NCME, laparoscopic CME was associated with less intraoperative blood loss [P<0.001, weighted mean difference (WMD)=-12.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): -13.56 to -10.45, I2=44%], more harvested lymph nodes (P<0.001, WMD=6.50, 95% CI: 3.57-9.42, I2=89%), longer length of specimens (P=0.004, WMD=3.57, 95% CI: 1.12-6.03, I2=93%), longer distance from tumor to high tie (P<0.001, WMD=1.36, 95% CI: 0.87-1.85, I2=76%), and longer distance from nearest bowel wall to high tie (P<0.001, WMD=1.36, 95% CI: 0.87-1.85, I2=85%). No differences were observed in terms of operative time, postoperative complications, wound infection, ileus, proximal, and distal resection margin or disease-free survival between 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The currently limited evidences suggest that laparoscopic CME can slightly decrease intraoperative blood loss and improve specimen quality, but its safety and survival benefits need to be further studied. High-quality evidences are needed before laparoscopic CME can be recommended as the standard procedure for colon cancer surgery.
Topics: Colectomy; Colonic Neoplasms; Humans; Laparoscopy; Lymph Node Excision; Mesocolon
PubMed: 32769740
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000845 -
Scientific Reports Mar 2018The surgeon dissecting the base of the mesenterium, around the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and artery, is facing a complex tridimensional vascular anatomy and should... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The surgeon dissecting the base of the mesenterium, around the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and artery, is facing a complex tridimensional vascular anatomy and should be aware of the anatomical variants in this area. The aim of this systematic review is to propose a standardized terminology of the superior mesenteric vessels, with impact in colon and pancreatic resections. We conducted a systematic search in PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases up to March 2017. Forty-five studies, involving a total of 6090 specimens were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of the ileocolic, right colic and middle colic arteries was 99.8%, 60.1%, and 94.6%, respectively. The superior right colic vein and Henle trunk were present in 73.9%, and 89.7% of specimens, respectively. In conclusion, the infra-pancreatic anatomy of the superior mesenteric vessels is widely variable. We propose the term Henle trunk to be used for any venous confluence between gastric, pancreatic and colic veins, which drains between the inferior border of the pancreas and up to 20 mm downward on the right-anterior aspect of the SMV. The term gastrocolic trunk should not be synonymous, but a subgroup of the Henle trunk, together with to gastropancreatocolic, gastropancreatic, or colopancreatic trunk.
Topics: Colon; Humans; Laparoscopy; Mesenteric Artery, Superior; Mesenteric Veins; Mesentery; Pancreas
PubMed: 29520096
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22641-x -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2011Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that most commonly involves the terminal ileum and colon (55 percent). Surgical treatment is required in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that most commonly involves the terminal ileum and colon (55 percent). Surgical treatment is required in approximately 70 percent of patients. Multiple procedures and repeat operations are required in 30 - 70 percent of all patients (Duepree 2002) but the disease remains incurable.Laparoscopy has gained wide acceptance in gastrointestinal surgery with potential advantages of faster return to normal activity and diet, reduced hospital stay, reduced postoperative pain, better cosmesis (Duepree 2002, Dunker 1998, Milsom 2001, Reissman 1996), improved social and sexual interaction (Albaz 2000) and its use is accepted in benign and malignant colorectal diseases. Laparoscopic surgery offers additional advantage of smaller abdominal fascial wounds, low incidence of hernias, and decreased rate of adhesive small-bowel obstruction (Albaz 2000) compared with conventional surgery reducing the need for non-disease-related surgical procedures in CD population.There are concerns about missing occult segments of disease and critical proximal strictures due to limited tactile ability, earlier recurrence due to possible reduced immune response induced by laparoscopy, technical difficulty due to fragile inflamed bowel and mesentery and the existence of adhesions, fistulas, and abscesses (Uchikoshi 2004). It is therefore important to evaluate the potential benefits and risks of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery in patients with small bowel CD (Lowney 2005).
OBJECTIVES
To determine if there is a difference in the perioperative outcomes and re-operation rates for disease recurrence following laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery in small bowel CD.
SEARCH STRATEGY
Published and unpublished randomised controlled trials were searched for in the following electronic databases: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 2010 issue 2 The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) 2010 issue 2 The Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group Controlled Trials Register Ovid MEDLINE (1990 to 2010) EMBASE (1990 to 2010) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database (1990 to 2010)
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for small bowel CD were included.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers independently assessed the studies and extracted data. RevMan 5.0 was used for statistical analysis.
MAIN RESULTS
Two RCTs comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for small bowel CD were identified. Long term outcomes of the patients in both the trials were published separately and these were included in the review.Laparoscopic surgery appeared to be associated with reduced number of wound infections (1/61 vs 9/59), reoperation rates for non disease related complications (3/57 vs 7/54 ) but the difference was not statistically significant [p values were 0.23 and 0.19 respectively]. There was no statistically significant difference between any of the compared outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery in the management of small bowel CD.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Laparoscopic surgery for small bowel CD may be as safe as the open operation. There was no significant difference in the perioperative outcomes and the long term reoperation rates for disease-related or non-disease related complications of CD.
Topics: Crohn Disease; Humans; Intestine, Small; Laparoscopy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 21249684
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006956.pub2