-
International Orthopaedics Dec 2010A systematic review of the literature was performed in order to evaluate the role of reduction and internal fixation in the management of Lisfranc joint... (Review)
Review
A systematic review of the literature was performed in order to evaluate the role of reduction and internal fixation in the management of Lisfranc joint fracture-dislocations. Articles were extracted from the Pubmed database and the retrieved reports were included in the study only if pre-specified eligibility criteria were fulfilled. Eleven articles were eligible for the final analysis, reporting data for the management of 257 patients. Injuries of the first three metatarsal rays were treated by closed reduction and internal fixation with screws in 16.3% of the patients, open reduction and internal fixation with screws in 66.5% and open reduction and internal fixation with Kirschner wires (K-wires) in 17.1% of the patients. The preferred method for the stabilisation of the fourth and fifth metatarsal rays was K-wires. Screw-related complications were common and were reported in 16.1% of the cases. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot score was 78.1 points. Post-traumatic radiographic arthritis was reported in 49.6% of the patients, but only in 7.8% of them it was severe enough to warrant an arthrodesis. We conclude that open reduction and internal fixation of the first three metatarsal rays with screws is a reliable method for the management of Lisfranc injuries. This can be complemented by K-wires application in the fourth and fifth metatarsal rays if needed.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Bone Screws; Bone Wires; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Joint Dislocations; Ligaments, Articular; Metatarsophalangeal Joint; Middle Aged; Recovery of Function; Sickness Impact Profile; Young Adult
PubMed: 20683593
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1101-x -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Sep 2021As a result of the high physical demand in sport, elite athletes are particularly prone to fifth metatarsal fractures. These injuries are typically managed surgically to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
As a result of the high physical demand in sport, elite athletes are particularly prone to fifth metatarsal fractures. These injuries are typically managed surgically to avoid high rates of delayed union and allow for quicker return to play (RTP).
PURPOSE
To review studies showing clinical and radiographic outcomes, RTP rates, and complication rates after different surgical treatment modalities for fifth metatarsal fractures exclusively in elite-level athletes.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted within the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from January 2000 to January 2020. Inclusion criteria consisted of clinical outcome studies after operative management of fifth metatarsal fractures in elite athletes. Exclusion criteria consisted of nonoperative management, high school or recreational-level athletic participation, nonclinical studies, expert opinions, and case series with <5 patients.
RESULTS
A total of 12 studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria, comprising 280 fifth metatarsal fractures treated surgically. Intramedullary screw fixation was the most common fixation construct (47.9%), and some form of intraoperative adjunctive treatment (calcaneal autograft, iliac crest bone graft, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, demineralized bone matrix) was used in 67% of cases. Radiographic union was achieved in 96.7% of fractures regardless of surgical construct used. The overall mean time to union was 9.19 weeks, with RTP at a mean of 11.15 weeks. The overall reported complication rate was 22.5%, with varying severity of complications. Refracture rates were comparable between the different surgical constructs used, and the overall refracture rate was 8.6%.
CONCLUSION
Elite athletes appeared to have a high rate of union and reliably returned to the same level of competition after surgical management of fifth metatarsal fractures, irrespective of surgical construct used. Despite this, the overall complication rate was >20%. Specific recommendations for optimal surgical management could not be made based on the heterogeneity of the included studies.
PubMed: 34552993
DOI: 10.1177/23259671211037647 -
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... Aug 2021Freiberg's disease is an osteonecrosis of the metatarsal head bone. Numerous surgical interventions can be provided; however, the literature is limited in systematic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Freiberg's disease is an osteonecrosis of the metatarsal head bone. Numerous surgical interventions can be provided; however, the literature is limited in systematic reviews discussing the various options. The study aimed to systematically review the quantity and quality of literatures exploring the surgical interventions.
METHODS
Fifty articles were found to be relevant for assessing the efficacy of common surgical interventions. The articles were assigned a level of evidence (I-V) to assess their quality. Next, the studies were reviewed to provide a grade of recommendation (A-C, I).
RESULTS
Two studies were found at level III that explored osteotomy and autologous transplantation; the other studies were level IV-V. There is poor evidence (grade C) in supporting of joint sparing and joint sacrificing for Freiberg's disease.
CONCLUSION
Poor evidence exists to support the surgical interventions for Freiberg's disease, higher quality trials are needed to support the increasing application of these surgical techniques.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV, Systematic review.
Topics: Humans; Metatarsal Bones; Metatarsus; Osteochondritis
PubMed: 32917526
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.08.005 -
The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery :... 2018We assessed which type of osteotomy would be most suited for correcting an increased fourth to fifth intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and metatarsophalangeal angle (MPA) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We assessed which type of osteotomy would be most suited for correcting an increased fourth to fifth intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and metatarsophalangeal angle (MPA) and would have the best results regarding the clinical condition and satisfaction. The study design was a systematic review and meta-analysis. The main outcome measures were the IMA, MPA, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Lesser Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal scale and satisfaction scores. A systematic search was performed in Medline, Embase, Cochrane, SPORTdiscus, and CINAHL up to September 2016. Prospective and retrospective studies that had evaluated the outcomes of fifth metatarsal osteotomies to correct a bunionette deformity at all patient ages were included. The outcomes were determined from clinical or radiographic evaluations. The search yielded 28 studies suitable for inclusion in our meta-analysis. All groups of osteotomies achieved significant IMA changes, with proximal osteotomies resulting in significantly greater changes than diaphyseal or distal osteotomies. The overall effect of osteotomies on the MPA was of a significant reduction. Proximal and diaphyseal osteotomies both resulted in significant differences in MPA correction compared with distal osteotomies. The incidence of major complications was the least in the distal osteotomy group. The overall mean success rate of bunionette surgery was 93%. The patients were most satisfied with proximal osteotomies, followed by distal and diaphyseal osteotomies (100% and 92%, respectively). In conclusion, every type of osteotomy has the capability of significantly reducing the fourth to fifth IMA and MPA. The fewest complications occurred with distal osteotomies, and the greatest satisfaction score was achieved with proximal osteotomies. However, only 1 study evaluated these results for proximal osteotomies. Distal osteotomies resulted in a high satisfaction rate and were the most represented osteotomy in our meta-analysis. Thus, when major IMA and MPA reduction is not required, the distal osteotomy could be the treatment of choice owing to its low complication rate.
Topics: Bunion, Tailor's; Female; Humans; Male; Metatarsal Bones; Osteotomy; Pain Measurement; Prospective Studies; Radiography; Recovery of Function; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29268897
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.08.006 -
Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland) May 2023Tailors bunions are common forefoot deformities affecting the fifth MPJ, with challenging symptomatology often resistant to conservative care. Currently no gold standard... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Tailors bunions are common forefoot deformities affecting the fifth MPJ, with challenging symptomatology often resistant to conservative care. Currently no gold standard exists for the surgical management of tailor's bunions, although the scarf osteotomy has been described as a versatile option for reducing these deformities.
METHODS
Relevant electronic databases were searched to collate all studies pertaining to tailors bunion correction using the scarf osteotomy between 2000 and 2021. Both surgeon and patient reported outcomes were required to be included in the systematic review. Methodological quality assessment and risk of bias was performed for each study. Statistical analysis of outcomes and complications was measured. Four small scale case series studies met the inclusion criteria.
RESULTS
All studies demonstrated a statistically significant reduction of 4th inter-metatarsal angles, improvement in clinical and patient reported outcome measures. 15% complication rate was identified, however recurring plantar hyperkeratoses were the most frequent, with one study suggesting a relationship with Pes Cavus. All four studies demonstrated significant methodological short comings and high risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
Scarf osteotomy provides good reduction of tailors' bunion deformities, demonstrates low complication rate and high patient satisfaction. Foot and Ankle surgeons should counsel patients' accordingly on risk of recurrence where hyperkeratosis is a key complaint.
Topics: Humans; Bunion, Tailor's; Radiography; Metatarsal Bones; Patient Satisfaction; Osteotomy; Treatment Outcome; Hallux Valgus
PubMed: 36870145
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2023.101982 -
Foot & Ankle International Mar 2023Recurrence of hallux valgus (HV) following corrective surgery is a frequent concern. A recent systematic review estimated recurrence of HV in only 4.9%, which may be an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Recurrence of hallux valgus (HV) following corrective surgery is a frequent concern. A recent systematic review estimated recurrence of HV in only 4.9%, which may be an underestimation, as most included studies had short- to mid-term follow-up. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess long-term outcomes of distal osteotomies of the first metatarsal (M1) to treat HV without inflammatory disease or degenerative arthritis, and to assess HV recurrence rates reported in studies that had a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
METHODS
This systematic review conforms to the PRISMA guidelines. The authors conducted a search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Studies that report outcomes of distal osteotomies of the M1 for noninflammatory and nondegenerative HV at a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
RESULTS
We found 17 eligible studies comprising 18 data sets, reporting outcomes of 4 categories of osteotomies: Chevron, Mitchell, Bösch, and "others." The HV recurrence rate was 64% considering the threshold of >15 degrees hallux valgus angle (HVA), 10% having >20 degrees, and 5% having >25 degrees.
CONCLUSION
At a minimum of 5 years following distal osteotomies of the M1, the mean weighted postoperative HVA was significantly higher for Mitchell osteotomies compared with the 3 other osteotomies reviewed. There were otherwise no significant differences in recurrence rates using the 3 HVA thresholds, or intermetatarsal angle among any of the surgical techniques reported in 2 or more studies. The pooled HV recurrence rates considering the various thresholds of HVA were as follows: 64% having >15 degrees, 10% having >20 degrees, and 5% having >25 degrees. The recurrence rates in the long term for all categories of surgical procedures suggest that better understanding of pathogenesis and prognosis of HV is required before modifying or introducing new surgical techniques.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV, meta-analysis.
Topics: Humans; Hallux Valgus; Follow-Up Studies; Metatarsal Bones; Osteotomy; Bunion; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36859795
DOI: 10.1177/10711007231152487 -
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... Jul 2023Treating osteochondral lesions of the first metatarsal head can help reducing pain and preventing end-stage arthritic cartilage degeneration and hallux rigidus. Several... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Treating osteochondral lesions of the first metatarsal head can help reducing pain and preventing end-stage arthritic cartilage degeneration and hallux rigidus. Several surgical techniques have been described, but no clear indications are reported. This systematic review aims to offer an overview of the current surgical treatments for focal osteochondral lesions of the first metatarsal head.
METHODS
The selected articles were examined to extract data about population, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes.
RESULTS
Eleven articles were included. Mean age at surgery was 38,2 years. Osteochondral autograft was the most used technique. After surgery, an improvement was achieved in AOFAS, VAS, and hallux dorsiflexion but not in plantarflexion.
CONCLUSION
There is limited evidence and knowledge regarding the surgical management of the first metatarsal head osteochondral lesions. Various surgical techniques have been proposed, drawn from other districts. Good clinical results have been reported. Further high-level comparative studies are necessary to design an evidence-based treatment algorithm.
Topics: Humans; Metatarsal Bones; Hallux Rigidus; Hallux; Metatarsophalangeal Joint; Treatment Outcome; Follow-Up Studies
PubMed: 37301674
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2023.05.007 -
PM & R : the Journal of Injury,... Apr 2021Acute metatarsal fractures are a common lower extremity injury. Although surgery may be recommended in specific cases, most are treated nonoperatively. Treatment...
OBJECTIVE
Acute metatarsal fractures are a common lower extremity injury. Although surgery may be recommended in specific cases, most are treated nonoperatively. Treatment protocols vary significantly among practitioners, with no consensus on the most efficacious approach. This systematic review aims to identify the effect of treatment protocols on union rate and functional outcome after an acute fifth metatarsal tuberosity fracture.
LITERATURE SURVEY
Multiple databases, including CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane CEntral Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from database inception to March 4, 2018 to identify clinical studies addressing nonoperative management of metatarsal fractures reporting nonunion, pain, and/or length of recovery.
METHODOLOGY
Two reviewers independently completed title, abstract, and full-text screening. Data abstraction was completed in duplicate. Outcome measures and complications were descriptively analyzed.
SYNTHESIS
A total of 1941 studies were eligible for screening. Seven studies (four randomized controlled trials and three prospective cohort studies) satisfied inclusion criteria. This resulted in a total of 388 patient with acute fifth metatarsal tuberosity fractures in 12 different treatment arms, with the most common treatment including plaster casting (7). The mean age was 42 years (27 to 56 years), and the overall nonunion rate was low (1.1%). Four unique functional scores were reported across all studies, and all showed good to excellent short-term results. The overall qualities of studies were moderate, with particular limitations in randomization and concealment allocation.
CONCLUSION
Most acute fifth metatarsal tuberosity fractures heal well, with good-to-excellent functional outcomes with nonoperative treatment, regardless of technique. We recommend a conservative rehabilitation framework, including 2 to 3 weeks of immobilization in a walking cast, followed by gradual increase in activity and strengthening until clinical union is achieved.
Topics: Ankle Injuries; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Metatarsal Bones; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 32472589
DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12427 -
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery... Oct 2021Metatarsal fractures are relatively common injuries that they might lead to significant disability and chronic pain if suboptimally treated. Operative treatment is... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Metatarsal fractures are relatively common injuries that they might lead to significant disability and chronic pain if suboptimally treated. Operative treatment is reserved for the displaced fractures. The primary aim of the herein study is to present the union time and rate, as well as the functional outcome of the surgically treated isolated lesser metatarsal shaft and neck fractures. The secondary aim is to present the related complications of each fixation method.
METHODS
The electronic databases of Pubmed, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane libraries were searched from January 1990 to December 2020. PRISMA guidelines were used for data collection. We retrieved five articles including in total 154 patients, which were compatible to our inclusion criteria and they were used for this systematic review.
RESULTS
A total of 75 patients were treated with percutaneous antegrade pinning resulting in AOFAS score: 96.4 ± 4.8 and time to heal 7.4 ± 1 weeks, 34 patients underwent ante/retrograde pinning resulting in AOFAS score: 95.2 ± 4.75 and time to heal 6.5 ± 1 weeks, and 45 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws resulting in a time to union 10.9 ± 0.5 weeks.
CONCLUSION
Our results demonstrate that K wire intramedullary nailing regardless of the specific technique (antegrade, retrograde, ante/retrograde) is associated with better outcomes compared to open reduction and internal fixation as it permits faster weight bearing and quicker rehabilitation. K-wire fixation is related to statistically significant shorter time for the fracture to heal, by approximately three weeks compared to open reduction and internal fixation. Future research should focus on studies directly comparing the different intramedullary K-wiring techniques and also K-wiring versus plate fixation.
Topics: Bone Wires; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Metatarsal Bones; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33484346
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-020-02869-y -
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... Jun 2022Hallux valgus is a common foot condition with numerous surgical techniques described. Minimally invasive surgery is becoming more popular, with resultant development of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Hallux valgus is a common foot condition with numerous surgical techniques described. Minimally invasive surgery is becoming more popular, with resultant development of suitable fixation devices. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence on the use of intramedullary devices in hallux valgus first metatarsal corrective osteotomies, and describe clinical and radiological outcomes, with an overview of techniques and implants used.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase and EMCare databases, conforming to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Radiological outcomes including the hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were recorded, as well as clinical outcome scores and complications. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the MINORS score.
RESULTS
Ten studies were included, comprising 696 feet in 745 patients. Data pooling and metanalysis was not possible due to overall low quality of evidence. Four implants were reported (Endolog, ISO Plate, V-Tek Plate, Link Fixator) and used with distal first metatarsal osteotomies, with improvement in HVA, IMA, and clinical outcome scores comparable to other fixation techniques. There were no reported cases of non-union. Complication rates were variable (all cause range of 0-21%) across all studies, with an overall low rate.
CONCLUSION
Intramedullary devices are viable and safe to use for hallux valgus first metatarsal osteotomies, with comparable radiological and functional outcomes to other techniques. Current evidence base is of low methodological quality, therefore high quality studies are required to further evaluate these devices.
Topics: Bunion; Hallux Valgus; Humans; Metatarsal Bones; Osteotomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35027311
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.12.010