-
Clinical Oral Investigations Dec 2023To systematically review studies on various occlusal splint materials and describe their mechanical and chemical properties. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review studies on various occlusal splint materials and describe their mechanical and chemical properties.
METHODS
MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science searches were conducted for in vitro studies focusing on occlusal splint materials. Two reviewers performed an assessment of the identified studies and data abstraction independently, and this was complimented by an additional hand search. The articles were limited to those in the English language that were published between January 1, 2012, and December 1, 2022.
RESULTS
The initial search yielded 405 search results of which 274 were selected for full-text review following abstract evaluation. 250 articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded, and the remaining 25 articles (with 1 article identified from the reference lists of included articles) providing mechanical and chemical values were used in this review. Poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) -based occlusal splint materials showed the highest values in terms of hardness, wear resistance, flexural strength, flexural modulus, e-modulus, and fracture toughness. The material group with the highest water sorption and water solubility was 3D printed (PR) splint materials. In addition, the lowest degree of double bond conversion was also observed in this group of materials.
CONCLUSIONS
The outcome of this review suggests that mechanically and chemically acceptable properties can be attained with PMMA-based occlusal splint materials using both conventional and digital production methods. PR splint materials should not be considered as the primary choice for long-term treatments due to their low mechanical and chemical properties.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
This review provides clinical recommendations for selecting the appropriate material and fabrication method for occlusal splints while taking the patients' needs and the materials´ mechanical and chemical properties into account.
Topics: Humans; Occlusal Splints; Polymethyl Methacrylate; Flexural Strength; Splints; Water
PubMed: 37910242
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05360-0 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2023Neonates are an extremely vulnerable patient population, with 6% to 9% admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) following birth. Neonates admitted to the NICU... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Neonates are an extremely vulnerable patient population, with 6% to 9% admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) following birth. Neonates admitted to the NICU will undergo multiple painful procedures per day throughout their stay. There is increasing evidence that frequent and repetitive exposure to painful stimuli is associated with poorer outcomes later in life. To date, a wide variety of pain control mechanisms have been developed and implemented to address procedural pain in neonates. This review focused on non-opioid analgesics, specifically non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, which alleviate pain through inhibiting cellular pathways to achieve analgesia. The analgesics considered in this review show potential for pain relief in clinical practice; however, an evidence summation compiling the individual drugs they comprise and outlining the benefits and harms of their administration is lacking. We therefore sought to summarize the evidence on the level of pain experienced by neonates both during and following procedures; relevant drug-related adverse events, namely episodes of apnea, desaturation, bradycardia, and hypotension; and the effects of combinations of drugs. As the field of neonatal procedural pain management is constantly evolving, this review aimed to ascertain the scope of non-opioid analgesics for neonatal procedural pain to provide an overview of the options available to better inform evidence-based clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of non-opioid analgesics in neonates (term or preterm) exposed to procedural pain compared to placebo or no drug, non-pharmacological intervention, other analgesics, or different routes of administration.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, and two trial registries in June 2022. We screened the reference lists of included studies for studies not identified by the database searches.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cluster-RCTs in neonates (term or preterm) undergoing painful procedures comparing NSAIDs and NMDA receptor antagonists to placebo or no drug, non-pharmacological intervention, other analgesics, or different routes of administration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our main outcomes were pain assessed during the procedure and up to 10 minutes after the procedure with a validated scale; episodes of bradycardia; episodes of apnea; and hypotension requiring medical therapy.
MAIN RESULTS
We included two RCTs involving a total of 269 neonates conducted in Nigeria and India. NMDA receptor antagonists versus no treatment, placebo, oral sweet solution, or non-pharmacological intervention One RCT evaluated using oral ketamine (10 mg/kg body weight) versus sugar syrup (66.7% w/w at 1 mL/kg body weight) for neonatal circumcision. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of ketamine on pain score during the procedure, assessed with the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS), compared with placebo (mean difference (MD) -0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.32 to -0.58; 1 RCT; 145 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No other outcomes of interest were reported on. Head-to-head comparison of different analgesics One RCT evaluated using intravenous fentanyl versus intravenous ketamine during laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity. Neonates receiving ketamine followed an initial regimen (0.5 mg/kg bolus 1 minute before procedure) or a revised regimen (additional intermittent bolus doses of 0.5 mg/kg every 10 minutes up to a maximum of 2 mg/kg), while those receiving fentanyl followed either an initial regimen (2 μg/kg over 5 minutes, 15 minutes before the procedure, followed by 1 μg/kg/hour as a continuous infusion) or a revised regimen (titration of 0.5 μg/kg/hour every 15 minutes to a maximum of 3 μg/kg/hour). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of ketamine compared with fentanyl on pain score assessed with the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R) scores during the procedure (MD 0.98, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.20; 1 RCT; 124 participants; very low-certainty evidence); on episodes of apnea occurring during the procedure (risk ratio (RR) 0.31, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.18; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.00; 1 study; 124 infants; very low-certainty evidence); and on hypotension requiring medical therapy occurring during the procedure (RR 5.53, 95% CI 0.27 to 112.30; RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.10; 1 study; 124 infants; very low-certainty evidence). The included study did not report pain score assessed up to 10 minutes after the procedure or episodes of bradycardia occurring during the procedure. We did not identify any studies comparing NSAIDs versus no treatment, placebo, oral sweet solution, or non-pharmacological intervention or different routes of administration of the same analgesics. We identified three studies awaiting classification. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The two small included studies comparing ketamine versus either placebo or fentanyl, with very low-certainty evidence, rendered us unable to draw meaningful conclusions. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of ketamine on pain score during the procedure compared with placebo or fentanyl. We found no evidence on NSAIDs or studies comparing different routes of administration. Future research should prioritize large studies evaluating non-opioid analgesics in this population. As the studies included in this review suggest potential positive effects of ketamine administration, studies evaluating ketamine are of interest. Furthermore, as we identified no studies on NSAIDs, which are widely used in older infants, or comparing different routes of administration, such studies should be a priority going forward.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Male; Analgesics; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Apnea; Body Weight; Bradycardia; Fentanyl; Ketamine; Pain; Pain, Procedural; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate
PubMed: 37014033
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015179.pub2 -
European Journal of Neurology May 2023Non-(acute disseminated encephalomyelitis) (non-ADEM) encephalitis and/or fluid attenuated inversion recovery hyperintense lesions in... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Non-(acute disseminated encephalomyelitis) (non-ADEM) encephalitis and/or fluid attenuated inversion recovery hyperintense lesions in anti-myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein-associated encephalitis with seizures (FLAMES) are rarely described in patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies (Abs). The aim was (i) to describe the clinical features and disease course of children and adults with non-ADEM encephalitis and/or FLAMES associated with MOG Abs and (ii) to describe their association with other central nervous system autoantibodies.
METHODS
This was a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines. Patients fulfilled criteria for non-ADEM encephalitis and/or FLAMES, and all were MOG Ab positive.
RESULTS
In total, 83 (79%) patients with non-ADEM encephalitis (48 also had FLAMES) and 22 (21%) with isolated FLAMES were included. At the first episode, children (n = 45) had more infections (11/45, 24.4%; p = 0.017) and more of the phenotype consisting of non-ADEM encephalitis (42/45, 93.3%; p = 0.014) than adults (n = 38). Children had more episodes consistent with working memory deficits (25/54, 46.3%; p = 0.014) but fewer psychiatric symptoms (16/54, 29.6%; p = 0.002). Twenty-eight (40.6%) of 69 patients had N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) Abs in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), being more frequent in adults (19/29, 65.5%; p < 0.001). Compared to negatives, positive CSF NMDAR Abs had more relapses (14/20, 70%; p = 0.050), required ventilatory support more frequently (8/34, 23.5%; p = 0.009) and had more psychiatric episodes (28/34, 82%; p < 0.001) or abnormal movements (14/34, 41.2%; p = 0.008). Apart from an older age in FLAMES, positive and negative CSF NMDAR Ab groups shared similar features.
CONCLUSION
Non-ADEM encephalitis patients with MOG Abs show specific clinical and radiological features, depending on the age at first episode. The presence of MOG Abs in non-ADEM encephalitis patients should not rule out to test other autoantibodies, especially concomitant NMDAR Abs in patients with suggestive symptoms such as behavioural or movement alterations.
Topics: Humans; Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein; Encephalitis; Encephalomyelitis, Acute Disseminated; Disease Progression; Autoantibodies
PubMed: 36704861
DOI: 10.1111/ene.15684 -
International Journal of Molecular... Aug 2023The pharmacological treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is unsatisfactory, and there is a clinical need for new approaches. Several drugs under advanced clinical...
The pharmacological treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is unsatisfactory, and there is a clinical need for new approaches. Several drugs under advanced clinical development are addressed in this review. A systematic literature search was conducted in three electronic databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus) and in the ClinicalTrials.gov register from 1 January 2016 to 1 June 2023 to identify Phase II, III and IV clinical trials evaluating drugs for the treatment of PHN. A total of 18 clinical trials were selected evaluating 15 molecules with pharmacological actions on nine different molecular targets: Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor (AT2R) antagonism (olodanrigan), Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel (VGCC) α2δ subunit inhibition (crisugabalin, mirogabalin and pregabalin), Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel (VGSC) blockade (funapide and lidocaine), Cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) inhibition (TRK-700), Adaptor-Associated Kinase 1 (AAK1) inhibition (LX9211), Lanthionine Synthetase C-Like Protein (LANCL) activation (LAT8881), N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism (esketamine), mu opioid receptor agonism (tramadol, oxycodone and hydromorphone) and Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) inhibition (fulranumab). In brief, there are several drugs in advanced clinical development for treating PHN with some of them reporting promising results. AT2R antagonism, AAK1 inhibition, LANCL activation and NGF inhibition are considered first-in-class analgesics. Hopefully, these trials will result in a better clinical management of PHN.
Topics: Humans; Drugs, Investigational; Nerve Growth Factor; Neuralgia, Postherpetic; Pregabalin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37629168
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612987 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2023Lumbar puncture (LP) is a common invasive procedure, most frequently performed to diagnose infection. Physicians perform LP in newborn infants with the help of an... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Lumbar puncture (LP) is a common invasive procedure, most frequently performed to diagnose infection. Physicians perform LP in newborn infants with the help of an assistant using a strict aseptic technique; it is important to monitor the infant during all the steps of the procedure. Without adequate analgesia, LP can cause considerable pain and discomfort. As newborns have increased sensitivity to pain, it is crucial to adequately manage the procedural pain of LP in this population.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms, including pain, discomfort, and success rate, of any pharmacological intervention during lumbar puncture in newborn infants, compared to placebo, no intervention, non-pharmacological interventions, or other pharmacological interventions.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, and three trial registries in December 2022. We also screened the reference lists of included studies and related systematic reviews for studies not identified by the database searches.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing drugs used for pain management, sedation, or both, during LP. We considered the following drugs suitable for inclusion. • Topical anesthetics (e.g. eutectic mixture of local anesthetics [EMLA], lidocaine) • Opioids (e.g. morphine, fentanyl) • Alpha-2 agonists (e.g. clonidine, dexmedetomidine) • N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists (e.g. ketamine) • Other analgesics (e.g. paracetamol) • Sedatives (e.g. benzodiazepines such as midazolam) DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. We used the fixed-effect model with risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous data, with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our main outcomes were successful LP on first attempt, total number of LP attempts, episodes of bradycardia, pain assessed with validated scales, episodes of desaturation, number of episodes of apnea, and number of infants with one or more episodes of apnea. We used the GRADE approach to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three studies (two RCTs and one quasi-RCT) that enrolled 206 newborns. One study included only term infants. All studies assessed topical treatment versus placebo or no intervention. The topical anesthetics were lidocaine 4%, lidocaine 1%, and EMLA. We identified no completed studies on opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alpha-2 agonists, NMDA receptor antagonists, other analgesics, sedatives, or head-to-head comparisons (drug A versus drug B). Based on very low-certainty evidence from one quasi-RCT of 100 LPs in 76 infants, we are unsure if topical anesthetics (lidocaine), compared to no anesthesia, has an effect on the following outcomes. • Successful LP on first attempt (first-attempts success in 48% of LPs in the lidocaine group and 42% of LPs in the control group) • Number of attempts per LP (mean 1.9 attempts, [standard error of the mean 0.2] in the lidocaine group, and mean 2.1 attempts [standard error of the mean 2.1] in the control group) • Episodes of bradycardia (0% of LPs in the lidocaine group and 4% of LPs in the control group) • Episodes of desaturation (0% of LPs in the lidocaine group and 8% of LPs in the control group) • Occurrence of apnea (RR 3.24, 95% CI 0.14 to 77.79; risk difference [RD] 0.02, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.08). Topical anesthetics compared to placebo may reduce pain assessed with the Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS) score (SMD -1.00 standard deviation (SD), 95% CI -1.47 to -0.53; I² = 98%; 2 RCTs, 112 infants; low-certainty evidence). No studies in this comparison reported total number of episodes of apnea. We identified three ongoing studies, which will assess the effects of EMLA, lidocaine, and fentanyl. Three studies are awaiting classification.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of topical anesthetics (lidocaine) compared to no anesthesia on successful lumbar puncture on first attempt, the number of attempts per lumbar puncture, episodes of bradycardia, episodes of desaturation, and occurrence of apnea. Compared to placebo, topical anesthetics (lidocaine or EMLA) may reduce pain assessed with the NFCS score. One ongoing study will assess the effects of systemic treatment.
Topics: Humans; Infant, Newborn; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Local; Apnea; Bradycardia; Fentanyl; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Lidocaine; Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination; Pain; Spinal Puncture
PubMed: 37767875
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015594.pub2 -
Acta Neurochirurgica Aug 2022Tumor-treating fields (TTF) is a novel cancer treatment that uses alternating electric fields to interfere with tumor cell mitosis. It has been approved by the U.S. food... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Tumor-treating fields (TTF) is a novel cancer treatment that uses alternating electric fields to interfere with tumor cell mitosis. It has been approved by the U.S. food and drug administration for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). We designed this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TTF in the treatment of rGBM.
METHODS
The study was based on the PRISMA guideline. Systematic retrieval was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The outcomes were overall survival (OS) hazard ratio (HR), 1-year survival rate, and cutaneous toxicity.
RESULTS
These studies included a total of 1048 rGBM patients who received TTF treatment. The overall survival time between the TTF group and the control group was HR 0.75 ([95%CI 0.63 to 0.89]; P = 0.001). Pooled 1-year overall survival rate and incidence of cutaneous toxicity were 0.47 and 0.48, respectively. Data were insufficient to evaluate the effect of MGMT methylation status and tumor recurrence times on heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS
TTF therapy is effective for recurrent glioblastoma. However, most relevant trials should assess rGBM patient baseline characteristics such as age, KPS, MGMT methylation status, and number of tumor recurrence,. In addition, the risk of rashes caused by long-term wearing of devices should also be considered.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Glioblastoma; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
PubMed: 35397674
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05192-z -
Medicinal Research Reviews Sep 2015Histone lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is the first discovered and reported histone demethylase by Dr. Shi Yang's group in 2004. It is classified as a member of... (Review)
Review
Histone lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is the first discovered and reported histone demethylase by Dr. Shi Yang's group in 2004. It is classified as a member of amine oxidase superfamily, the common feature of which is using the flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) as its cofactor. Since it is located in cell nucleus and acts as a histone methylation eraser, LSD1 specifically removes mono- or dimethylated histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) and H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) through formaldehyde-generating oxidation. It has been indicated that LSD1 and its downstream targets are involved in a wide range of biological courses, including embryonic development and tumor-cell growth and metastasis. LSD1 has been reported to be overexpressed in variety of tumors. Inactivating LSD1 or downregulating its expression inhibits cancer-cell development. LSD1 targeting inhibitors may represent a new insight in anticancer drug discovery. This review summarizes recent studies about LSD1 and mainly focuses on the basic physiological function of LSD1 and its involved mechanisms in pathophysiologic conditions, as well as the development of LSD1 inhibitors as potential anticancer therapeutic agents.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Catalysis; Cell Nucleus; Epigenesis, Genetic; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Female; Histone Demethylases; Histones; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasms; Oxygen; Peptides; Protein Interaction Mapping; Protein Structure, Tertiary; Receptors, Estrogen; Stem Cells; Transcription, Genetic
PubMed: 25990136
DOI: 10.1002/med.21350 -
Cells Jul 2023Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint disorder characterized by progressive degeneration of cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM), chondrocyte hypertrophy and apoptosis and... (Review)
Review
Epigenetic Modifications of MiRNAs in Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review on Their Methylation Levels and Effects on Chondrocytes, Extracellular Matrix and Joint Inflammation.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint disorder characterized by progressive degeneration of cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM), chondrocyte hypertrophy and apoptosis and inflammation. The current treatments mainly concern pain control and reduction of inflammation, but no therapeutic strategy has been identified as a disease-modifying treatment. Therefore, identifying specific biomarkers useful to prevent, treat or distinguish the stages of OA disease has become an immediate need of clinical practice. The role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in OA has been investigated in the last decade, and increasing evidence has emerged that the influence of the environment on gene expression through epigenetic processes contributes to the development, progression and aggressiveness of OA, in particular acting on the microenvironment modulations. The effects of epigenetic regulation, particularly different miRNA methylation during OA disease, were highlighted in the present systematic review. The evidence arising from this study of the literature conducted in three databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) suggested that miRNA methylation state already strongly impacts OA progression, driving chondrocytes and synoviocyte proliferation, apoptosis, inflammation and ECM deposition. However, the possibility of understanding the mechanism by which different epigenetic modifications of miRNA or pre-miRNA sequences drive the aggressiveness of OA could be the new focus of future investigations.
Topics: Humans; Chondrocytes; MicroRNAs; Epigenesis, Genetic; Methylation; Osteoarthritis; Inflammation; Extracellular Matrix
PubMed: 37508486
DOI: 10.3390/cells12141821 -
Epileptic Disorders : International... Aug 2022Epileptic myoclonus or myoclonic seizures can occur in idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) and progressive myoclonus epilepsy (PME). However, symptomatic myoclonus... (Review)
Review
Epileptic myoclonus or myoclonic seizures can occur in idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) and progressive myoclonus epilepsy (PME). However, symptomatic myoclonus which is stimulus-sensitive and provoked by movement is typically seen in PME and Lance-Adams syndrome. Symptomatic myoclonus is not always associated with epileptiform discharges on the electroencephalogram. Therapeutic interventions such as anti-seizure medications (ASMs), the ketogenic diet and vagus nerve stimulation are not always effective. There is emerging evidence that perampanel (PER), an α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist, may be effective for the treatment of myoclonic seizures and symptomatic myoclonus. We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the efficacy of PER as treatment for myoclonic seizures and symptomatic myoclonus. Twenty-seven studies with a total sample size of 260 patients were included. The efficacy of PER was analysed separately for myoclonic seizures and symptomatic myoclonus. In the group with myoclonic seizures, 50% responder, 75% responder and seizure freedom rates were reported as 74.3% (101/ 136), 60.3% (82/136) and 57.4% (78/136), respectively, with a follow-up duration of 6-12 months. However, in one post-hoc analysis of data from patients with IGE, the efficacy of PER as treatment for myoclonic seizures during the double-blind phase showed no significant difference compared to placebo. The efficacy of PER for symptomatic myoclonus was reported in a total of 119 patients. Four studies (n=88 patients) reported the efficacy of PER as a decrease in myoclonus score/scale. In the remaining 31 patients, symptomatic myoclonus resolved in three patients, decreased in 21 patients and seven patients showed no improvement. We also analysed the number of patients who were already on levetiracetam (LEV) or valproic acid (VPA) at the time of PER initiation; these data were available for 153 patients. Of these, 56.8% were on LEV and 75.1% were on VPA when PER was initiated. This systematic review suggests that PER maybe effective as treatment for drug-resistant myoclonic seizures and symptomatic myoclonus. It may also be effective in patients who have already failed to respond to LEV and VPA. These findings are preliminary yet encouraging. This study has several limitations, particularly given the scarcity of high-quality randomized controlled trials and marked heterogeneity regarding the type and results of the studies. Hence, the findings of this review should be viewed with considerable reservation.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Epilepsy, Generalized; Humans; Immunoglobulin E; Levetiracetam; Myoclonic Epilepsies, Progressive; Myoclonus; Nitriles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 35770766
DOI: 10.1684/epd.2022.1439 -
Cancer May 2022H3G34-mutant diffuse hemispheric glioma (DHG) is recognized as a new, distinct entity in the latest World Health Organization classification for central nervous system... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
H3G34-mutant diffuse hemispheric glioma (DHG) is recognized as a new, distinct entity in the latest World Health Organization classification for central nervous system tumors and is associated with a particularly aggressive course. The authors performed a systematic review and pooled analysis to investigate the frequency of genetic events in these tumors and to determine whether these events were associated with survival trends.
METHODS
Two electronic databases were accessed to search for relevant data. Included criteria were studies that had individual patient data on H3.3 G34-mutant gliomas. To analyze the impact of genetic events on overall survival, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were used, and corresponding hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed.
RESULTS
In total, 20 studies with 257 H3G34-mutant DHGs were included for integrated analyses. The H3 glycine-to-valine (H3G34V) mutation showed a significantly worse prognosis than the glycine-to-arginine (H3G34R) mutation (median overall survival, 9.9 vs 14.8 months; hazard ratio, 3.040; 95% confidence interval, 1.208-7.651; P = .018), and this result remained statistically significant in the multivariate Cox regression model. Among H3G34 DHGs, TP53 mutation was the most common genetic alteration (94.9%), followed by ATRX alterations (87.5%), MGMT methylation (79.5%), and PDGFRA alterations (33.2%). The presence of PDGFRA amplification or EGFR amplification conferred poor survival. After adjusting for age and sex, these alterations were still independent indicators for adverse outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
The authors highlight the important role of molecular stratification of H3G34 DHGs, which may help refine our understanding of the natural history of this group of malignant tumors.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Genotype; Glioma; Glycine; Humans; Prognosis
PubMed: 35195909
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34156