-
European Urology Open Science Jul 2024No clear-cut markers for predicting positive sperm retrieval (+SR) at microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) have been identified thus far. Our aim was to... (Review)
Review
Role of Follicle-stimulating Hormone, Inhibin B, and Anti-Müllerian Hormone in Predicting Sperm Retrieval from Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia Undergoing Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
No clear-cut markers for predicting positive sperm retrieval (+SR) at microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) have been identified thus far. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the ability of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), inhibin B (InhB), and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) to predict +SR in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) undergoing mTESE.
METHODS
We performed a search in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. Thirty-four publications were selected for inclusion in the analysis.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS
Overall, the mean +SR rate was 45%. Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) values revealed significant hormonal differences between the +SR and -SR groups, with lower FSH (SMD -0.30), higher InhB (SMD 0.54), and lower AMH (SMD -0.56) levels in the +SR group. Pooled odds ratios (Ors) revealed no significant prediction of +SR by either FSH (OR 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.06) or InhB (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02), despite variations in baseline levels and study heterogeneity. Conversely, AMH had significant predictive value (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.92), with lower baseline levels in the +SR group. InhB and FSH levels were higher in the +SR group, while InhB exhibited the opposite trend.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Despite study heterogeneity, our meta-analysis findings support the ability of AMH to predict +SR for men with NOA undergoing mTESE.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We conducted a review and analysis of results from previous studies. Our findings show that for men with an infertility condition called nonobstructive azoospermia, blood levels of anti-Müllerian hormone can predict successful extraction of sperm using a microsurgical technique. Levels of two other hormones did not predict successful sperm extraction.
PubMed: 38854995
DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.05.001 -
Andrology Jan 2024There has been no systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze and summarize the predictive factors of successful sperm extraction in salvage microdissection... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Predictors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed initial TESE in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
There has been no systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze and summarize the predictive factors of successful sperm extraction in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to investigate the factors predicting the result of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who failed the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for literature that described the characteristics of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failing the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction published prior to June 2022.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included four retrospective studies with 332 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent a failed initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction and three retrospective studies with 177 non-obstructive azoospermia patients who underwent a failed conventional testicular sperm extraction. The results were as follows: among non-obstructive azoospermia patients whose first surgery was microdissection testicular sperm extraction, younger patients (standard mean difference: -0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.55 to -0.01) and those with smaller bilateral testicular volume (standard mean difference: -0.55, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.15), lower levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (standard mean difference: -0.86, 95% CI: -1.18 to -0.54) and luteinizing hormone (standard mean difference: -0.68, 95% CI: -1.16 to -0.19), and whose testicular histological type was hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.30-9.53) were more likely to retrieve spermatozoa successfully, while patients with Sertoli-cell-only syndrome (odds ratio: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.73) were more likely to fail again in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Additionally, in patients who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after a failed initial conventional testicular sperm extraction, those with testicular histological type of hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 30.35, 95% CI: 8.27-111.34) were more likely to be successful, while those with maturation arrest (odds ratio: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18-0.83) rarely benefited.
CONCLUSION
We found that age, testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, hypospermatogenesis, Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, and maturation arrest were valuable predictors of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction, which will assist andrologists in clinical decision-making and minimize unnecessary injury to patients.
Topics: Humans; Male; Azoospermia; Oligospermia; Retrospective Studies; Microdissection; Sperm Retrieval; Semen; Testis; Spermatozoa; Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Luteinizing Hormone; Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human
PubMed: 37172416
DOI: 10.1111/andr.13448 -
Fertility and Sterility Nov 2015To investigate the relative differences in outcomes among microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE), conventional testicular sperm extraction (cTESE), and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the relative differences in outcomes among microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE), conventional testicular sperm extraction (cTESE), and testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) in men with nonobstructive azoospermia.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
SETTING
Outpatient academic and private urology clinics.
PATIENTS(S)
Men with nonobstructive azoospermia.
INTERVENTION(S)
Micro-TESE, cTESE, or TESA.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
Sperm retrieval (SR).
RESULT(S)
Fifteen studies with a total of 1,890 patients were identified. The weighted average age of the patients was 34.4 years, the follicular stimulating hormone level was 20.5 mIU/mL, the T was 373 ng/dL, and the testicular volume was 13.5 mL. In a direct comparison, performance of micro-TESE was 1.5 times more likely (95% confidence interval 1.4-1.6) to result in successful SR as compared with cTESE. Similarly, in a direct comparison, performance of cTESE was 2.0 times more likely (95% confidence interval 1.8-2.2) to result in successful SR as compared with TESA. Because of inconsistent reporting, evaluation of other procedural characteristics and pregnancy outcomes was not possible.
CONCLUSION(S)
Sperm retrieval was higher for micro-TESE compared with cTESE and for cTESE compared with TESA. Standardization of reported outcomes as well as combining all available SR data would help to further elucidate the SRs of these procedures.
Topics: Adult; Azoospermia; Humans; Male; Microdissection; Sperm Retrieval; Spermatogenesis; Suction; Testis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26263080
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1136 -
Human Reproduction Update Aug 2022The beneficial effects of hormonal therapy in stimulating spermatogenesis in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and either normal gonadotrophins or... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The beneficial effects of hormonal therapy in stimulating spermatogenesis in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and either normal gonadotrophins or hypergonadotropic hypogonadism prior to surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) is controversial. Although the European Association of Urology guidelines state that hormone stimulation is not recommended in routine clinical practice, a significant number of patients undergo empiric therapy prior to SSR. The success rate for SSR from microdissection testicular sperm extraction is only 40-60%, thus hormonal therapy could prove to be an effective adjunctive therapy to increase SSR rates.
OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE
The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the SSR rates in men with NOA (excluding those with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism) receiving hormone therapy compared to placebo or no treatment. The secondary objective was to compare the effects of hormonal therapy in normogonadotropic and hypergonadotropic NOA men.
SEARCH METHODS
A literature search was performed using the Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Clinicaltrials.gov databases from 01 January 1946 to 17 September 2020. We included all studies where hormone status was confirmed. We excluded non-English language and animal studies. Heterogeneity was calculated using I2 statistics and risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools. We performed a meta-analysis on all the eligible controlled trials to determine whether hormone stimulation (irrespective of class) improved SSR rates and also whether this was affected by baseline hormone status (hypergonadotropic versus normogonadotropic NOA men). Sensitivity analyses were performed when indicated.
OUTCOMES
A total of 3846 studies were screened and 22 studies were included with 1706 participants. A higher SSR rate in subjects pre-treated with hormonal therapy was observed (odds ratio (OR) 1.96, 95% CI: 1.08-3.56, P = 0.03) and this trend persisted when excluding a study containing only men with Klinefelter syndrome (OR 1.90, 95% CI: 1.03-3.51, P = 0.04). However, the subgroup analysis of baseline hormone status demonstrated a significant improvement only in normogonadotropic men (OR 2.13, 95% CI: 1.10-4.14, P = 0.02) and not in hypergonadotropic patients (OR 1.73, 95% CI: 0.44-6.77, P = 0.43). The literature was at moderate or severe risk of bias.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS
This meta-analysis demonstrates that hormone therapy is not associated with improved SSR rates in hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. While hormone therapy improved SSR rates in eugonadal men with NOA, the quality of evidence was low with a moderate to high risk of bias. Therefore, hormone therapy should not be routinely used in men with NOA prior to SSR and large scale, prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the meta-analysis findings.
Topics: Azoospermia; Hormones; Humans; Klinefelter Syndrome; Male; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Semen; Sperm Retrieval; Spermatozoa; Testis
PubMed: 35526153
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmac016 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology May 2023Pancreato-biliary and gynecological adenocarcinomas need better tools to predict clinical outcome. Potential prognostic mesenchymal(-like) transcriptome-based subtypes... (Review)
Review
Pancreato-biliary and gynecological adenocarcinomas need better tools to predict clinical outcome. Potential prognostic mesenchymal(-like) transcriptome-based subtypes have been identified in these cancers. In this systematic review, we include studies into molecular subtyping and summarize biological and clinical features of the subtypes within and across sites of origin, searching for suggestions to improve classification and prognostication. PubMed and Embase were searched for original research articles describing potential mesenchymal(-like) mRNA-based subtypes in pancreato-biliary or gynecological adenocarcinomas. Studies limited to supervised clustering were excluded. Fourty-four studies discussing cholangiocarcinomas, gallbladder, ampullary, pancreatic, ovarian, and endometrial adenocarcinomas were included. There was overlap in molecular and clinical features in mesenchymal(-like) subtypes across all adenocarcinomas. Approaches including microdissection were more likely to identify prognosis-associated subtypes. To conclude, molecular subtypes in pancreato-biliary and gynecological adenocarcinomas share biological and clinical characteristics. Furthermore, separation of stromal and epithelial signals should be applied in future studies of biliary and gynecological adenocarcinomas.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Adenocarcinoma; Prognosis; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic
PubMed: 37004743
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103982 -
Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and... Oct 2021Amyloidosis is a disease caused by pathological fibril aggregation and deposition of proteins in different tissues and organs. Thirty-six fibril-forming proteins have...
Amyloidosis is a disease caused by pathological fibril aggregation and deposition of proteins in different tissues and organs. Thirty-six fibril-forming proteins have been identified. So far, proteomic evaluation of amyloid focused on the detection and characterization of fibril proteins mainly for diagnostic purposes or to find novel fibril-forming proteins. However, amyloid deposits are a complex mixture of constituents that show organ-, tissue-, and amyloid-type specific patterns, that is the amyloid proteome. We carried out a comprehensive literature review on publications investigating amyloid via liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry, including but not limited to sample preparation by laser microdissection. Our review confirms the complexity and dynamics of the amyloid proteome, which can be divided into four functional categories: amyloid proteome-category 1 (APC1) includes exclusively fibrillary proteins found in the patient; APC2 includes potential fibril-forming proteins found in other types of amyloid; and APC3 and APC4 summarizes non-fibril proteins-some being amyloid signature proteins. Our categorization may help to systemically explore the nature and role of the amyloid proteome in the manifestation, progression, and clearance of disease. Further exploration of the amyloid proteome may form the basis for the development of novel diagnostic tools, thereby enabling the development of novel therapeutic targets.
Topics: Amyloid; Amyloidosis; Humans; Proteome; Proteomics
PubMed: 34311636
DOI: 10.1080/10409238.2021.1937926 -
Histochemistry and Cell Biology Jul 2020Molecular pathology allows the identification of causative agents in infectious diseases and detection of biomarkers important for prediction of disease susceptibility,...
Molecular pathology allows the identification of causative agents in infectious diseases and detection of biomarkers important for prediction of disease susceptibility, diagnosis and personalized therapy. Accordingly, nucleic acid-based methods have gained a special role in clinical laboratories particularly to evaluate solid and hematological tumors. Extraction of nucleic acids is commonly performed in microdissected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) or cytological samples that had been previously evaluated through the use of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or Papanicolau (Pap) stains, respectively. Although the effect of both stains on nucleic acids integrity has been explored by several authors, the results are not consistent and require further examination. Accordingly, the goal of this review was to assess the influence of H&E and Pap stains on DNA and RNA integrity and to address the mechanism by which each staining compromises molecular based-analysis. The analyzed studies demonstrate that H&E- and Pap-staining result in low DNA recovery and some degree of DNA fragmentation. Additionally, it is concluded that hemalum inhibits PCR by interfering with DNA extraction, preventing DNA polymerase attachment and possibly by rescuing divalent cations. Accordingly, proper sample purification and adjustment of PCR conditions are of key importance to achieve satisfactory results by PCR in H&E- and Pap-stained samples. Furthermore, although H&E results in RNA fragmentation, it is possible to perform expression analysis in H&E-stained frozen sections, using RNase-free conditions, low amounts of hematoxylin and a rapid protocol from sample collection to RNA analysis. It The effect of Pap-staining on RNA integrity remains to be determined.
Topics: Animals; DNA; Eosine Yellowish-(YS); Hematoxylin; Humans; Papanicolaou Test; Paraffin Embedding; Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA; Staining and Labeling
PubMed: 32372108
DOI: 10.1007/s00418-020-01882-w -
Andrology Jan 2014Retrieval of spermatozoa is unfortunately still only successful in a subset of patients suffering from non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) by conventional testicular sperm... (Review)
Review
Retrieval of spermatozoa is unfortunately still only successful in a subset of patients suffering from non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) by conventional testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Microdissection TESE may have some theoretical benefits over conventional TESE, but uncertainty exists about its superiority. The objective of this systematic review was therefore to compare the efficacy and safety of microTESE with conventional TESE in men with NOA. The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. Literature was searched for studies comparing outcome of conventional TESE with microdissection TESE. Primary outcome was sperm retrieval rate (SRR). Secondary outcomes were clinical predictors of sperm retrieval as well as complication rate. Of 62 articles, a total of seven studies were included in the final analysis. Overall SRR was significantly higher in the microTESE group in comparison with conventional TESE in five of these studies. Overall sperm retrieval ranged from 16.7 to 45% in the conventional TESE vs. 42.9 to 63% in the microTESE group. A sub-analysis of the SRR according to testicular histology was available in four of the selected articles. MicroTESE in men with Sertoli cell only syndrome and hypospermatogenesis carried a small but significant more favourable outcome according to, respectively, two and one of the studies. Correlation of serum follicle stimulating hormone and testicular volume with positive outcome was variable. Fewer complications were observed on ultrasound examination after microTESE procedure. Clinical randomized studies comparing microTESE with conventional TESE in NOA are still lacking to date. Pseudo-randomized prospective data, however, show more favourable sperm retrieval in NOA for microTESE, especially in histological patterns of patchy spermatogenesis such as Sertoli cell only syndrome. However, in patients with uniform histological patterns such as maturation arrest outcome of microTESE seems less favourable.
Topics: Azoospermia; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Humans; Male; Microdissection; Oligospermia; Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome; Sperm Retrieval; Spermatozoa; Testis; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 24193894
DOI: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00148.x -
Fertility and Sterility Mar 2019Infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia is treatable with the use of testicular sperm extraction and IVF. The optimal approach for sperm retrieval is...
Infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia is treatable with the use of testicular sperm extraction and IVF. The optimal approach for sperm retrieval is microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). This systematic review summarizes and evaluates the literature pertaining to patient optimization before mTESE, mTESE technique, and post-mTESE testicular tissue processing. Preoperative patient optimization has been assessed in terms of adjuvant hormone therapy and varicocele repair. Limited data are available for adjuvant medical therapy, and although also limited, data for varicocele repair support increased sperm retrieval, pregnancy, and return of sperm to the ejaculate. Post-mTESE tissue processing has few comparative studies; however, most studies support the combination of mechanical mincing and use of type 4 collagenase for tissue disintegration along with pentoxifylline to assist in identifying motile and viable spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Topics: Azoospermia; Fertility; Humans; Infertility, Male; Male; Microdissection; Risk Factors; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic; Sperm Retrieval; Spermatogenesis; Testis; Treatment Outcome; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male
PubMed: 30827516
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.01.003 -
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Oct 2020The objective of the study was to identify guidelines to assist systematic reviewers or clinical researchers in identifying sampling bias due to tumor heterogeneity (TH)...
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the study was to identify guidelines to assist systematic reviewers or clinical researchers in identifying sampling bias due to tumor heterogeneity (TH) in solid cancers assayed for somatic mutations. We also assessed current reporting standards to determine the impact of TH on sample bias.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING
We conducted a systematic review searching 13 databases (to January 2019) to identify guidelines. A post hoc analysis was performed using 12 prostate tumor somatic mutation data sets from a previous systematic review to assess reporting on TH.
RESULTS
Searches identified 2,085 records. No formal guidelines were identified. Forty publications contained incidental recommendations across five major themes: using multiple tumor samples (n = 29), sample purity thresholds (n = 14), using specific sequencing methods (n = 8), using liquid biopsies (n = 4), and microdissection (n = 4). In post hoc analyses, 50% (6 of 12) clearly reported pathology methods. Forty-two percent (5 of 12) did not report pathology results. Forty-two percent (5 of 12) confirmed the pathology of the sample by direct diagnosis rather than inference. Forty-two percent (5 of 12) used multiple samples per patient. Fifty-eight percent (7 of 12) reported on tumor purity (reported ranges 10% to 100%).
CONCLUSIONS
As precision medicine progresses to the clinic, guidelines are required to help evidence-based decision makers understand how TH may impact sample bias. Authors need to clearly report pathology methods and results and tumor purity methods and results.
Topics: Data Management; Decision Making; Female; Genetic Heterogeneity; Genetic Testing; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Knowledge; Male; Mutation; Neoplasms; Precision Medicine; Publications; Research Personnel; Sample Size; Selection Bias
PubMed: 32540382
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.010