-
American Journal of Otolaryngology 2023Microsurgical operations such as middle ear surgery rely heavily on visibility of the surgical field. Anesthetic techniques such as controlled hypotension have been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Microsurgical operations such as middle ear surgery rely heavily on visibility of the surgical field. Anesthetic techniques such as controlled hypotension have been developed to improve surgical field visibility by attempting to decrease bleeding. Many agents have been utilized to achieve controlled hypotension intraoperatively. Dexmedetomidine is a relatively newer agent which works on alpha-2 receptors to decrease sympathetic tone. This paper sought to determine the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for optimizing surgical field visibility in MES.
METHODS
A comprehensive search strategy was used in PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and CENTRAL through August 9, 2022 for this systematic review and meta-analysis.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
adult patients undergoing middle ear surgery with dexmedetomidine used for controlled hypotension to improve surgical field visibility. Risk of bias was assessed via Cochrane RoB 2. Meta-analysis of mean difference for surgical field scores and risk ratios for positive surgical field scores were used to compare dexmedetomidine with placebo or other agents.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were included in this review. Statistically significant mean difference was found to favor dexmedetomidine over placebo for Fromme-Boezaart surgical field scores. Statistically significant results were also demonstrated favoring dexmedetomidine over other agents in risk ratio for receiving positive surgical field scores, as well as surgeon and patient satisfaction scores.
CONCLUSIONS
Controlled hypotension is an invaluable tool for surgical field visibility. Improved surgical field visibility was observed with dexmedetomidine compared with placebo and various other agents. Risk of sub-optimal bleeding scores was significantly lower with dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine is effective at improving surgical field visibility in middle ear surgery.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Dexmedetomidine; Hypotension, Controlled; Ear, Middle; Otologic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 37163960
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103917 -
Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine Dec 2021Inner ear barotrauma (IEBt) and inner ear decompression sickness (IEDCS) are the two dysbaric inner ear injuries associated with diving. Both conditions manifest as... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Inner ear barotrauma (IEBt) and inner ear decompression sickness (IEDCS) are the two dysbaric inner ear injuries associated with diving. Both conditions manifest as cochleovestibular symptoms, causing difficulties in differential diagnosis and possibly delaying (or leading to inappropriate) treatment.
METHODS
This was a systematic review of IEBt and IEDCS cases aiming to define diving and clinical variables that help differentiate these conditions. The search strategy consisted of a preliminary search, followed by a systematic search covering three databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus). Studies were included when published in English and adequately reporting one or more IEBt or IEDCS patients in diving. Concerns regarding missing and duplicate data were minimised by contacting original authors when necessary.
RESULTS
In total, 25 studies with IEBt patients (n = 183) and 18 studies with IEDCS patients (n = 397) were included. Variables most useful in differentiating between IEBt and IEDCS were dive type (free diving versus scuba diving), dive gas (compressed air versus mixed gas), dive profile (mean depth 13 versus 43 metres of seawater), symptom onset (when descending versus when ascending or surfacing), distribution of cochleovestibular symptoms (vestibular versus cochlear) and absence or presence of other DCS symptoms. Symptoms of difficult middle ear equalisation or findings consistent with middle ear barotrauma could not be reliably assessed in this context, being insufficiently reported in the IEDCS literature.
CONCLUSIONS
There are multiple useful variables to help distinguish IEBt from IEDCS. Symptoms of difficult middle ear equalisation or findings consistent with middle ear barotrauma require further study as means of distinguishing IEBt and IEDCS.
Topics: Barotrauma; Decompression Sickness; Diagnosis, Differential; Diving; Ear, Inner; Humans
PubMed: 34897597
DOI: 10.28920/dhm51.4.328-337 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2020Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), sometimes referred to as chronic otitis media (COM), is a chronic inflammation and often polymicrobial infection (involving more... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), sometimes referred to as chronic otitis media (COM), is a chronic inflammation and often polymicrobial infection (involving more than one micro-organism) of the middle ear and mastoid cavity, characterised by ear discharge (otorrhoea) through a perforated tympanic membrane. The predominant symptoms of CSOM are ear discharge and hearing loss. Topical antibiotics, the most common treatment for CSOM, act to kill or inhibit the growth of micro-organisms that may be responsible for the infection. Antibiotics can be used alone or in addition to other treatments for CSOM, such as antiseptics or ear cleaning (aural toileting).
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of topical antibiotics (without steroids) for people with CSOM.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL via the Cochrane Register of Studies); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 1 April 2019.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with at least a one-week follow-up involving participants (adults and children) who had chronic ear discharge of unknown cause or CSOM, where the ear discharge had continued for more than two weeks. The interventions were any single, or combination of, topical antibiotic agent(s) of any class, applied directly into the ear canal as ear drops, powders or irrigations, or as part of an aural toileting procedure. The two main comparisons were topical antibiotic compared to a) placebo or no intervention and b) another topical antibiotic (e.g. topical antibiotic A versus topical antibiotic B). Within each comparison we separated studies where both groups of participants had received topical antibiotic a) alone or with aural toileting and b) on top of background treatment (such as systemic antibiotics).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used the standard Cochrane methodological procedures. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Our primary outcomes were: resolution of ear discharge or 'dry ear' (whether otoscopically confirmed or not), measured at between one week and up to two weeks, two weeks to up to four weeks and after four weeks; health-related quality of life using a validated instrument; ear pain (otalgia) or discomfort or local irritation. Secondary outcomes included hearing, serious complications and ototoxicity measured in several ways.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 17 studies with a total of 2198 participants. Twelve studies reported the sample size in terms of participants (not ears); these had a total of 1797 participants. The remaining five studies reported both the number of participants and ears, representing 401 participants, or 510 ears. A: Topical antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment (with aural toilet in both arms and no other background treatment) One small study compared a topical antibiotic (ciprofloxacin) with placebo (saline). All participants received aural toilet. Although ciprofloxacin was better than saline in terms of resolution of discharge at one to two weeks: 84% versus 12% (risk ratio (RR) 6.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.82 to 24.99; 35 participants, very low-certainty evidence), the very low certainty of the evidence means that it is very uncertain whether or not one intervention is better or worse than the other. The study authors reported that "no medical side-effects and worsening of audiological measurements related to this topical medication were detected" (very low-certainty evidence). B: Topical antibiotics versus placebo or no treatment (with use of oral antibiotics in both arms) Four studies compared topical ciprofloxacin to no treatment (three studies; 190 participants) or topical ceftizoxime to no treatment (one study; 248 participants). In each study all participants received the same antibiotic systemically (oral ciprofloxacin, injected ceftizoxime). In at least one study all participants received aural toilet. Useable data were only available from the first three studies; ciprofloxacin was better than no treatment, resolution of discharge occurring in 88.2% versus 60% at one to two weeks (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.80; 2 studies, 150 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported ear pain or discomfort/local irritation. C: Comparisons of different topical antibiotics The certainty of evidence for all outcomes in these comparisons is very low. Quinolones versus aminoglycosides Seven studies compared an aminoglycoside (gentamicin, neomycin or tobramycin) with ciprofloxacin (734 participants) or ofloxacin (214 participants). Whilst resolution of discharge at one to two weeks was higher in the quinolones group the very low certainty of the evidence means that it is very uncertain whether or not one intervention is better or worse than the other (RR 1.95, 95% CI 0.88 to 4.29; 6 studies, 694 participants). One study measured ear pain and reported no difference between the groups. Quinolones versus aminoglycosides/polymyxin B combination ±gramicidin We identified three studies but data on our primary outcome were only available in one study. Comparing ciprofloxacin to a neomycin/polymyxin B/gramicidin combination, for an unknown treatment duration (likely four weeks), ciprofloxacin was better (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.22, 186 participants). A "few" patients experienced local irritation upon the first instillation of topical treatment (numbers/groups not stated). Others Other studies examined topical gentamicin versus a trimethoprim/sulphacetamide/polymixin B combination (91 participants) and rifampicin versus chloramphenicol (160 participants). Limited data were available and the findings were very uncertain.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We are uncertain about the effectiveness of topical antibiotics in improving resolution of ear discharge in patients with CSOM because of the limited amount of low-quality evidence available. However, amongst this uncertainty there is some evidence to suggest that the use of topical antibiotics may be effective when compared to placebo, or when used in addition to a systemic antibiotic. There is also uncertainty about the relative effectiveness of different types of antibiotics; it is not possible to determine with any certainty whether or not quinolones are better or worse than aminoglycosides. These two groups of compounds have different adverse effect profiles, but there is insufficient evidence from the included studies to make any comment about these. In general, adverse effects were poorly reported.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Chronic Disease; Humans; Otitis Media, Suppurative; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31896168
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013051.pub2 -
American Journal of Otolaryngology 2021Endoscopic ear surgery (EES) is minimally invasive and increasingly used to treat middle ear disease. In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacies of EES and... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Endoscopic ear surgery (EES) is minimally invasive and increasingly used to treat middle ear disease. In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacies of EES and microscopic ear surgery (MES) in patients with middle ear cholesteatoma.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies that reported the comparative surgical outcomes of EES and MES in patients with middle ear cholesteatoma. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. All included studies involved ≥1 of the following outcomes: recurrence of or residual disease, graft intake success rate, audiological performance, and operation time. We calculated the pooled relative risk (RR) or weighted mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using STATA software.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. The pooled recurrence and residual rates of cholesteatoma were significantly lower in the EES group than in the MES group [RR: 0.51, 95%CI: 0.31-0.84, heterogeneity (I) = 4.7%; P = .394; RR: 0.68; 95%CI: 0.47-0.99; I = 0.0%; P = .878; respectively]. There were no significant differences in other parameters, such as graft intake success rates, audiological performance, and operation times, between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION
The pooled results showed that EES reduced the residual lesion rate and postoperative recurrence risk in patients with middle ear cholesteatoma. However, there was insufficient evidence to prove that EES was advantageous in graft intake success rate auditory performance, and operation time.
Topics: Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear; Endoscopy; Female; Hearing; Humans; Male; Microscopy; Microsurgery; Operative Time; Otologic Surgical Procedures; Recurrence; Risk; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33360773
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102451 -
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent... Jan 2012A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the association between secondhand tobacco smoke (SHTS) and middle ear disease (MED) in children. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the association between secondhand tobacco smoke (SHTS) and middle ear disease (MED) in children.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CAB abstracts (through December 2010) and reference lists.
STUDY SELECTION
Sixty-one epidemiological studies of children assessing the effect of SHTS on outcomes of MED. Articles were reviewed, and the data were extracted and synthesized by 2 researchers. MAIN OUTCOME EXPOSURES: Children's SHTS exposure.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Middle ear disease in children.
RESULTS
Living with a smoker was associated with an increased risk of MED in children by an odds ratio (OR) of 1.62 (95% CI, 1.33-1.97) for maternal postnatal smoking and by 1.37 (95% CI, 1.25-1.50) for any household member smoking. Prenatal maternal smoking (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.93-1.31) and paternal smoking (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.98-1.57) were associated with a nonsignificant increase in the risk of MED. The strongest effect was on the risk of surgery for MED, where maternal postnatal smoking increased the risk by an OR of 1.86 (95% CI, 1.31-2.63) and paternal smoking by 1.83 (95% CI, 1.61-2.07).
CONCLUSIONS
Exposure to SHTS, particularly to smoking by the mother, significantly increases the risk of MED in childhood; this risk is particularly strong for MED requiring surgery. We have shown that per year 130 200 of child MED episodes in the United Kingdom and 292 950 of child frequent ear infections in the United States are directly attributable to SHTS exposure in the home.
Topics: Child; Female; Humans; Maternal Behavior; Odds Ratio; Otitis Media; Paternal Behavior; Pregnancy; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Regression Analysis; Risk; Tobacco Smoke Pollution
PubMed: 21893640
DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.158 -
The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and... Nov 2023To assess the prognostic factors for anatomic and hearing success after tympanoplasty in the setting of complex middle ear pathology. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To assess the prognostic factors for anatomic and hearing success after tympanoplasty in the setting of complex middle ear pathology.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed in January 2022. English-language articles describing outcome data for tympanoplasty repair variables including underlying pathology, perforation location, smoking status, graft technique, reconstruction material, anatomic success, and hearing success were extracted. Articles were included when tympanosclerosis, retraction pockets, adhesions, cholesteatoma, chronic suppurative otitis media, anterior perforations, and smoking were included. Underlying pathology, perforation location, smoking status, graft technique, reconstruction material, anatomic success, and hearing success were extracted. Any factors analyzed as potential indicators of success were sought out.
RESULTS
Data sources included PubMed, OVID, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and manual search of bibliographies. Ninety-three articles met final criteria, which accounted for 6685 patients. Fifty articles presented data on both anatomic and hearing outcomes, 32 articles presented data on anatomic outcomes only, and 11 articles presented data on hearing outcomes only. This systematic review found that adhesions and tympanosclerosis were prognostic factors for poorer hearing. Additionally, smoking and tympanosclerosis may be predictive of anatomic failure; however, the significance of this finding was mixed in included studies. This analysis is significantly limited by both the heterogeneity within the patients and the lack of controls.
CONCLUSION
Adhesions and tympanosclerosis were prognostic factors for poorer hearing. Clearly documented methods and outcomes for the included pathologies could lead to more definitive conclusions regarding prognostic factors for success.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
3B.
Topics: Humans; Tympanoplasty; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Ear, Middle; Otitis Media, Suppurative
PubMed: 36951041
DOI: 10.1177/00034894231159000 -
Otology & Neurotology : Official... Feb 2021To systematically review the available medical literature to investigate the viral load in the middle ear and mastoid cavity and the potential risk of exposure to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the available medical literature to investigate the viral load in the middle ear and mastoid cavity and the potential risk of exposure to airborne viruses during otologic surgery.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases.
STUDY SELECTION
This review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Protocol.
DATA EXTRACTION
Using the Boolean method and relevant search term combinations for terms "mastoid," "middle ear," "virus," "exposure" "COVID-19" "SARS-CoV-2." PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were queried. A total of 57 abstracts were identified and screened by two independent reviewers. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria, 18 studies were selected for the final analysis.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Due to the heterogeneity of clinical data, a meta-analysis was not feasible.
RESULTS
Rhinovirus, followed by respiratory syncytial virus are reported to be the most prevalent viruses in MEF samples but formal statistical analysis is precluded by the heterogeneity of the studies. Drilling was identified to have the highest risk for aerosol generation and therefore viral exposure during otologic Surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
The medical literature has consistently demonstrated the presence of nucleic acids of respiratory viruses involving the middle ear, including SARS-CoV2 in a recent postmortem study. Although no in vivo studies have been conducted, due to the likely risk of transmission, middle ear and mastoid procedures, particularly involving the use of a drill should be deferred, if possible, during the pandemic and enhanced personal protective equipment (PPE) used if surgery is necessary.
Topics: COVID-19; Ear, Middle; Humans; Mastoid; Otologic Surgical Procedures; Pandemics; Viral Load
PubMed: 33201081
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002986 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... May 2012Middle ear myoclonus is a rare condition with distinct characteristics at presentation. Diagnosis is based primarily on history, clinical examination, and... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Middle ear myoclonus is a rare condition with distinct characteristics at presentation. Diagnosis is based primarily on history, clinical examination, and long-time-based tympanometry. No consensus exists regarding treatment at present. This review was designed to identify relevant studies on current investigation and management.
DATA SOURCE
A systematic electronic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Trials register, and Web of Science was conducted for articles describing middle ear myoclonus through to May 2011. English- and non-English-language articles that focused on investigation and treatment were considered for review.
REVIEW METHOD
Two authors independently reviewed the articles for study design, treatment, intervention, and outcome. Data from human and experimental studies were considered.
RESULTS
A total of 21 articles were identified for this review. Most studies were found to be case reports or small case series. In general, there was no evidence of a conclusive diagnostic test or treatment for middle ear myoclonus.
CONCLUSION
There is a need for high-quality prospective controlled trials to determine the most effective management of middle ear myoclonus. The authors describe a treatment algorithm based on the data available and clinical knowledge.
Topics: Diagnosis, Differential; Disease Management; Ear, Middle; Humans; Myoclonus
PubMed: 22261497
DOI: 10.1177/0194599811434504 -
The South African Journal of... Mar 2020Literature suggests that risk factors for middle ear pathologies, such as traumatic injuries and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), exist in mines. However, studies on...
BACKGROUND
Literature suggests that risk factors for middle ear pathologies, such as traumatic injuries and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), exist in mines. However, studies on hearing health in mines seem to focus primarily on occupational noise-induced hearing loss and ignore middle ear pathologies. As a result, there is little documented evidence on the trends of middle ear pathologies in mine workers.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to explore and document published evidence reflecting trends in middle ear pathologies in mine workers.
METHOD
A systematic literature review of studies that reported middle ear pathologies in mine workers was conducted. Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, PsychInfo and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies in English published between January 1994 and December 2018 and reporting on trends in middle ear pathologies in mine workers.
RESULTS
Two research studies met the selection criteria and were included for analysis. One research study used tympanometry with 226 Hz probe tone, while another study used interviews to determine the presence of middle ear pathologies. While these studies indicate that middle ear pathologies exist in individuals working in mines, the evidence is limited.
CONCLUSION
While current data indicate that individuals working in mines may present with middle ear pathologies of varying severities, the evidence is too small to provide a clear trend of middle ear pathologies in individuals working in mines. Therefore, the current limited data suggest a need for further studies to examine middle ear pathologies in individuals working in mines.
Topics: Acoustic Impedance Tests; Ear, Middle; Hearing Loss; Humans; Miners
PubMed: 32242444
DOI: 10.4102/sajcd.v67i2.679 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Dec 2014The inconsistent measures used to report outcomes after mastoidectomy to treat cholesteatoma make it impossible for clinicians to compare results and apply them... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The inconsistent measures used to report outcomes after mastoidectomy to treat cholesteatoma make it impossible for clinicians to compare results and apply them appropriately to patient care. We sought to identify and assess the type and relative frequency of the reported measures.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science.
REVIEW METHODS
We searched 3 independent databases for articles that reported outcomes of middle ear cholesteatoma treated with mastoidectomy. Articles were assessed for eligibility using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol and data were extracted by 2 independent investigators. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials from the past 30 years were included. Articles with less than 50 subjects and nonsurgical studies were excluded. The measures used by each study were recorded, and the relative frequency of each measure was calculated.
RESULTS
Forty-three of 380 articles met criteria. Time to follow up was inconsistent. Most articles reported on preoperative qualitative parameters (77%); however, few reported on the severity of disease (19%) or formally staged the disease (12%). Not all studies reported on the presence of recurrent or residual disease (88%) or the postoperative audiogram results (70%). Only 12% presented results as a Kaplan-Meier disease-free curve. Most studies reported on complications (70%).
CONCLUSION
Reported measures were inconsistent among the studies, which makes comparisons between studies unreliable. Standardization will optimize future reporting and will allow for the establishment of best practices.
Topics: Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Mastoid; Otologic Surgical Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25193517
DOI: 10.1177/0194599814549547