-
Journal of Palliative Medicine May 2023The objective of this systematic review is to consolidate the existing evidence on opioid use, including administration, dosing, and efficacy, for the relief of dyspnea... (Review)
Review
The objective of this systematic review is to consolidate the existing evidence on opioid use, including administration, dosing, and efficacy, for the relief of dyspnea at end of life. The overarching goal is to optimize clinical management of dyspnea by identifying patterns in opioid use, improving opioid management of dyspnea, and to prioritize future research. Opioids are commonly used in the management of dyspnea at end of life, yet specific administration guidelines are limited. A greater understanding of the effectiveness of opioids in relieving end-of-life dyspnea with consideration of study design, patients, and opioids, including dyspnea evaluation tools and outcomes, will leverage development of standardized administration and dosing. A PRISMA-guided systematic review using six databases identified quality studies of opioid management for patients with dyspnea at end of life. Twenty-three references met review inclusion criteria, which included terminally ill cancer and noncancer patients with various diagnoses. Studies included two randomized controlled trials, and three nonrandomized experimental, three prospective observational, one cross-sectional, and one case series. Thirteen retrospective chart reviews were also included due to the limited rigorous studies rendered by the search. Thirteen studies evaluated morphine, followed by fentanyl (6), oxycodone (5), general opioid use (4), and hydromorphone (2). Routes of administration were parenteral, oral, combination, and nebulization. Dyspnea was evaluated using self-reporting and non-self-reporting evaluation tools. Sedation was the most reported opioid-related adverse effect. Challenges persist in conducting end-of-life research, preventing consensus on standardization of opioid treatment for dyspnea within this specific palliative time frame. Future robust prospective trials using specific, accurate assessment with reassessment of dyspnea/respiratory distress, and consideration of opioid tolerance, polypharmacy, and comorbidities are required.
Topics: Humans; Analgesics, Opioid; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Tolerance; Morphine; Dyspnea; Death; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 36453988
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0311 -
Neonatal Network : NN Nov 2018To compare the effects of morphine and methadone on length of hospital stay (LOS) or treatment (LOT) and adverse effects in infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
PURPOSE
To compare the effects of morphine and methadone on length of hospital stay (LOS) or treatment (LOT) and adverse effects in infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS).
DESIGN
Systematic review.
SAMPLE
PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, CINAHL, IPA, American Academy of Pediatrics, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. comparing morphine and methadone for NAS.
OUTCOMES
LOS, LOT, adverse effects.
RESULTS
One RCT, two cohort studies, and two chart reviews met inclusion criteria. Each had a low risk of bias. LOS ranged from 12.08 to 36 days with morphine and 21 to 44.23 days with methadone. LOT ranged from 7.46 to 22.9 days (morphine) and 13.9 to 38.08 days (methadone). Adverse effects were not reported. Clinical evidence comparing morphine to methadone for NAS treatment is limited and conflicting. A recommendation for one over the other cannot be made based on these outcomes.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Female; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Length of Stay; Male; Methadone; Morphine; Narcotics; Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; United States
PubMed: 30567886
DOI: 10.1891/0730-0832.37.6.365 -
BMJ Open Mar 2019Morphine is frequently used in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) due to its analgesic effect, it being recommended in the main cardiology guidelines in Europe and the USA.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Morphine is frequently used in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) due to its analgesic effect, it being recommended in the main cardiology guidelines in Europe and the USA. However, controversy exists regarding its routine use due to potential safety concerns. We conducted a systematic review of randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies to synthesise the available evidence.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and trial registries.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
We included RCTs and observational studies evaluating the impact of morphine in cardiovascular outcomes or platelet reactivity measures.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data were screened, extracted and appraised by two independent reviewers. The data were pooled results using a random-effects model. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), platelet reactivity (using VerifyNow) and bleeding, reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. We assessed the confidence in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. We followed the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
RESULTS
Five RCTs and 12 observational studies were included, enrolling 69 993 participants. Pooled results showed an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (RR 1.45 [95% CI 1.10 to 1.91], low GRADE confidence), MACE (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.45) and an increased platelet reactivity at 1 and 2 hours (59.37 platelet reactivity units [PRU], 95% CI 36.04 to 82.71; 68.28 PRU, 95% CI 37.01 to 99.55, high GRADE confidence) associated with morphine. We found no significant difference in the risk of bleeding. We found no differences in subgroup analyses based on study design and ACS subtype.
CONCLUSIONS
Morphine was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and MACE but the high risk of bias leads to low result confidence. There is high confidence that morphine decreases the antiplatelet effect of P2Y12 inhibitors.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42016036357.
Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Analgesics, Opioid; Humans; Morphine; Observational Studies as Topic; Pain; Pain Management; Risk Factors
PubMed: 30878985
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025232 -
Developmental Medicine and Child... Jan 2021To identify and evaluate the evidence documenting the association between neonatal morphine and later childhood neuropsychological development.
AIM
To identify and evaluate the evidence documenting the association between neonatal morphine and later childhood neuropsychological development.
METHOD
We conducted a systematic literature search of eight electronic databases from inception until June 2019. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies recruiting neonates who received morphine treatment, and measuring neuropsychological development outcomes with a minimum follow-up of 6 months.
RESULTS
Twelve separate reports from three RCTs and five cohort studies met our inclusion criteria. Owing to the small number of the included trials and the variable study designs, a meta-analysis was not performed. The findings from this review indicated that neonatal morphine use had no adverse effects on behaviour, cognition, motor, and executive function development at 8 to 9 years and earlier; except for the inconsistent conclusions on internalizing behavioural problems at 5 to 7 years and cognitive and motor developments at 18 months.
INTERPRETATION
Why a child needs morphine may have a more profound impact on later neuropsychological development than morphine itself. The small number, high heterogeneity, and limitations of the included studies limit confidence in the result of this systematic review.
Topics: Behavioral Symptoms; Child; Child Behavior; Child Development; Child, Preschool; Cognition; Executive Function; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Morphine; Narcotics; Psychomotor Performance
PubMed: 33078421
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14703 -
Current Reviews in Clinical and... 2021Coronary artery disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. A major health concern in the developing countries is opioid addiction, which has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Coronary artery disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. A major health concern in the developing countries is opioid addiction, which has controversial cardiovascular side effects. We aimed to investigate whether Myocardial Infarction (MI) and its risk factors are associated with morphine dependency in the Iranian population.
METHODS
Electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline, Scopus, SID, Element, and Magiran were searched to find published articles including the keywords morphine, coronary artery disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus.
RESULTS
Twelve studies involving 25,800 people were included in this systematic review and metaanalysis. Morphine dependency was significantly associated with MI with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 2.28 (95%CI=1.26-4.11). It neither has significant associations with hypertension (AOR=0.952; 95%CI=0.696-1.301) nor diabetes (AOR=0.895; 95%CI=0.644-1.246). Morphine dependency also had no significant association with hyperlipidemia with a Crude Odds Ratio (COR) of 0.906 (95%CI=0.786-1.045).
CONCLUSION
Morphine dependency was significantly related to MI, but its risk factors were not significantly associated with morphine dependency. The increasing prevalence of opioid abuse in developing countries may be a reason for the growing incidence of MI in younger ages and individuals with no risk factors. Besides, physicians should consider the presence of impurities in morphine-based opioids and their possible effects on health.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Iran; Myocardial Infarction; Opioid-Related Disorders
PubMed: 33511945
DOI: 10.2174/1574884716666210129100455 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Sep 2023Neuraxial opioids provide effective analgesia for Caesarean delivery, however, pruritus can be a troubling side-effect. Effective agents to prevent pruritus are needed.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Neuraxial opioids provide effective analgesia for Caesarean delivery, however, pruritus can be a troubling side-effect. Effective agents to prevent pruritus are needed. Our objective was to perform an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis to provide clinicians with a comparison of relative efficacy of available interventions to reduce the incidence of pruritus, induced by either intrathecal or epidural single-shot morphine, in women undergoing Caesarean delivery.
METHODS
Databases systematically searched (up to January 2022) included PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, EBSCO CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, and two Cochrane databases. We included randomised, controlled trials involving adult female patients undergoing Caesarean delivery. We pooled trials comparing interventions used for preventing pruritus after Caesarean delivery and performed a Bayesian model network meta-analysis.
RESULTS
The final primary network included data from comparisons of 14 distinct interventions (including placebo) used to reduce the incidence of pruritus in 6185 participants. We judged five interventions to be 'definitely superior' to placebo: propofol, opioid agonist-antagonists (neuraxial), opioid antagonists, opioid agonist-antagonists (systemic), and serotonin antagonists. For the network evaluating the incidence of severe pruritus (warranting additional therapeutic treatment of pruritus), data were available for 14 interventions (including placebo) in 4489 patients. For this outcome, we judged three interventions to be 'definitely superior' to placebo: dopamine antagonists (neuraxial) and systemic and neuraxial opioid agonist-antagonists.
CONCLUSION
Our analysis found several interventions to be effective in reducing the incidence of pruritus. Although sub-hypnotic doses of propofol appear to have an antipruritic effect, replication of this finding and further investigation of optimal dosing are warranted.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL
PROSPERO (CRD42022367058).
Topics: Pregnancy; Adult; Humans; Female; Morphine; Analgesics, Opioid; Propofol; Network Meta-Analysis; Bayes Theorem; Cesarean Section; Pruritus
PubMed: 37455197
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.05.028 -
Archives of Disease in Childhood Oct 2021To systematically review available paediatric literature on comparisons between morphine (Mo) and hydromorphone (Hm), to guide clinicians to rationally use these... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review available paediatric literature on comparisons between morphine (Mo) and hydromorphone (Hm), to guide clinicians to rationally use these medications.
DESIGN
Systematic review within four databases for all studies published from 1963 to July 2019.
SETTING
All paediatric settings.
ELIGIBILITY
All studies comparing Mo to Hm in individuals younger than 21 years.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The primary outcome was to compare clinical efficacy and side effects of Mo and Hm. The secondary outcomes were the comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles and the description of predefined Mo to Hm conversion ratios used across the paediatric literature.
RESULTS
Among 754 abstracts reviewed, 59 full-text articles met inclusion criteria and 24 studies were included in the analysis: 4 studies compared pharmacodynamics of Mo and Hm and 20 studies reported the use of a predefined Mo to Hm conversion ratio. Most studies had a poor methodological quality. Available evidence suggests that, when given intravenously, the equianalgesic ratio of Mo to Hm is 5:1. Intravenous administration with this ratio results in a similar rate of adverse effects, including pruritus and nausea. The epidural administration with a ratio of 10:1 results in more pruritus and urinary retention with Mo than Hm. Pharmacokinetic data were reported in only one study. A wide range of pre-established ratios for different routes of administration were reported, but few were based on evidence.
CONCLUSION
Current literature does not permit a rational choice between Mo and Hm. A ratio of 5:1 seems adequate for intravenous administration and leads to a similar rate of adverse effects.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Adolescent; Analgesics, Opioid; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Hydromorphone; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Morphine; Nausea; Pain; Pruritus; Urinary Retention
PubMed: 33461958
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319059 -
Current Medical Research and Opinion May 2012To systematically assess efficacy and safety of buprenorphine patch versus fentanyl patch in patients with chronic moderate to severe pain. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically assess efficacy and safety of buprenorphine patch versus fentanyl patch in patients with chronic moderate to severe pain.
METHODS
Fifteen databases were searched up to December 2010. Randomised and quasi-randomised trials assessing the efficacy in patients with chronic pain were included. Quantitative methods for data synthesis were used and two network meta-analyses were conducted.
RESULTS
Fourteen unique trials (17 publications) were included. No head-to-head randomised trials of buprenorphine patch compared with fentanyl patch were identified. Therefore, less robust evidence from indirect comparisons was used. Results from a network meta-analysis of non-enriched designs (eight trials), using trials versus placebo and trials versus morphine for indirect comparisons, indicated that transdermal fentanyl, in comparison with transdermal buprenorphine, showed significantly more nausea (odds ratio [OR] 4.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 20.39), a significantly higher number of treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (OR 5.94, 95% CI 1.78 to 19.87), and non-significant differences on all other outcomes, including pain measures. In comparison with morphine, transdermal buprenorphine had a significantly higher decrease of pain intensity (MD [mean difference] -16.20, 95% CI -28.92 to -3.48) while morphine caused more cases of constipation (OR 7.50, 95% CI 1.45 to 38.85) and a significantly higher number of treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (OR 5.80, 95% CI 1.68 to 20.11). All other outcomes showed non-significant differences between transdermal buprenorphine and morphine. The results were similar when also including six trials using enriched designs with the exception of more cases of vomiting for fentanyl (OR 17.32, 95% CI 4.43 to 67.71) and morphine (OR 15.85, 95% CI 3.92 to 64.13) compared to buprenorphine.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings indicate comparability of transdermal buprenorphine and transdermal fentanyl for pain measures with significantly fewer adverse events (nausea and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events) caused by transdermal buprenorphine.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Chronic Pain; Constipation; Fentanyl; Humans; Morphine; Nausea; Pain; Pain Measurement; Transdermal Patch; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 22443154
DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2012.678938 -
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma,... Dec 2021Clinically meaningful pain reduction with respect to severity and the adverse events of drugs used in prehospital pain management for children are areas that have not... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Clinically meaningful pain reduction with respect to severity and the adverse events of drugs used in prehospital pain management for children are areas that have not received sufficient attention. The present systematic review therefore aims to perform a comprehensive search of databases to examine the preferable drugs for prehospital pain relief in paediatric patients with acute pain, irrespective of aetiology.
METHODS
The systematic review includes studies from 2000 and up to 2020 that focus on children's prehospital pain management. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO with registration no. CRD42019126699. Pharmacological pain management using any type of analgesic drug and in all routes of administration was included. The main outcomes were (1) measurable pain reduction (effectiveness) and (2) no occurrence of any serious adverse events. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Epistemonikos and Cochrane library. Finally, the risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist and a textual narrative analysis was performed due to the heterogeneity of the results.
RESULTS
The present systematic review on the effectiveness and safety of analgesic drugs in prehospital pain relief in children identified a total of eight articles. Most of the articles reviewed identified analgesic drugs such as fentanyl (intranasal/IV), morphine (IV), methoxyflurane (inhalational) and ketamine (IV/IM). The effects of fentanyl, morphine and methoxyflurane were examined and all of the included analgesic drugs were evaluated as effective. Adverse events of fentanyl, methoxyflurane and ketamine were also reported, although none of these were considered serious.
CONCLUSION
The systematic review revealed that fentanyl, morphine, methoxyflurane and combination drugs are effective analgesic drugs for children in prehospital settings. No serious adverse events were reported following the administration of fentanyl, methoxyflurane and ketamine. Intranasal fentanyl and inhalational methoxyflurane seem to be the preferred drugs for children in pre-hospital settings due to their ease of administration, similar effect and safety profile when compared to other analgesic drugs. However, the level of evidence (LOE) in the included studies was only three or four, and further studies are therefore necessary.
Topics: Acute Pain; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Child; Emergency Medical Services; Fentanyl; Humans
PubMed: 34895311
DOI: 10.1186/s13049-021-00974-3 -
Journal of Sleep Research Jun 2022The present study was conducted to systematically evaluate the acute effect of morphine on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The present study was conducted to systematically evaluate the acute effect of morphine on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wan-Fang databases were searched for randomised controlled trials studying the influence of morphine on OSA published up to May 24, 2021. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess study quality and meta-analysis was performed on the included clinical trial results to quantify the impact of morphine on various sleep and respiratory parameters. Three studies (n = 132 patients) were ultimately examined. There were no significant differences between patients with OSA taking morphine and placebo/non-opioids with respect to the sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Index (mean difference [MD] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.41, 5.98; p > 0.05); Oxygen Desaturation Index (MD 1.49, 95% CI -3.21, 6.19; p > 0.05); Obstructive Sleep Apnea Index (MD 0.83, 95% CI -2.08, 3.75; p > 0.05); Hypopnea Index (MD -0.01, 95% CI -2.64, 2.63; p > 0.05); lowest oxygen saturation (MD 0.68, 95% CI -4.50, 5.86; p > 0.05); or sleep oxygen saturation >90% (MD 0.10, 95% CI -1.14, 1.34; p > 0.05). In conclusion, a single dose of 30 or 40 mg morphine does not have a significant effect on sleep or respiratory outcomes compared to placebo in patients with OSA, challenging the orthodoxy that opioids worsen OSA.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Humans; Morphine; Oxygen; Sleep; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 34806800
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13523