-
BMC Medical Imaging Jan 2017To systematically investigate the relationship between CT morphological features and the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
To systematically investigate the relationship between CT morphological features and the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS
All studies about the CT morphological features of NSCLC with EGFR mutations published between January 1, 2000 and March 15, 2015 were searched in the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Qualified studies were selected according to inclusion criteria. The frequency of EGFR mutations and CT features of ground-glass opacity (GGO) content, tumor size, cavitation, air-bronchogram, lobulation, and spiculation were extracted. The relationship between EGFR mutations and each of these CT features was tested based upon the weighted mean difference or inverse variance in the form of an odds ratio at a 95% confidence interval using Forest Plots. The publication bias was examined using Egger's test.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies, consisting of 2146 NSCLC patients, were included, and 51.12% (1097/2146) of patients had EGFR mutations. The EGFR mutations were present in NSCLC with part-solid GGO in contrast to nonsolid GGO (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.25-0.96, P = 0.04). Other CT features such as tumor size, cavitation, air-bronchogram, lobulation and spiculation did not demonstrate statistically significant correlation with EGFR mutations individually (P = 0.91; 0.67; 0.12; 0.45; and 0.36, respectively). No publication bias among the selected studies was noted in this meta-analysis (Egger's tests, P > 0.05 for all).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis demonstrated that NSCLC with CT morphological features of part-solid GGO tended to be EGFR mutated, which might provide an important clue for the correct selection of patients treated with molecular targeted therapies.
Topics: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; ErbB Receptors; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Mutation Rate; Neoplasm Staging; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 28068946
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-016-0175-3 -
Clinical & Translational Oncology :... Feb 2024The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) using the most recent data available. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) using the most recent data available.
METHODS
The literature on the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 versus placebo and/or best supportive care (BSC) in mCRC was obtained through a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases through January 2023. Identify the included literature and extract pertinent data, such as the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), disease control rate (DCR), incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
RESULTS
There were eight eligible articles that included 2903 patients (1964 TAS-102 versus 939 Placebo and/or BSC). In this meta-analysis, TAS-102 treatment resulted in longer OS, PFS, TTF, and higher DCR in patients with mCRC versus placebo and/or BSC. TAS-102 improved OS and PFS in subgroup analyses of mCRC patients with KRAS wild-type and KRAS mutant-type. In addition, TAS-102 did not increase the incidence of serious adverse events.
CONCLUSION
TAS-102 can enhance the prognosis of mCRC patients whose standard therapy has failed, regardless of KRAS mutation status, and its safety is acceptable.
Topics: Humans; Trifluridine; Uracil; Colorectal Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Colonic Neoplasms; Rectal Neoplasms; Drug Combinations; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Pyrrolidines; Thymine
PubMed: 37414979
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03268-5 -
Journal of Pediatric Hematology/oncology Jul 2017It has been reported that germline DICER1 mutations correlate with a distinctive human disease syndrome. Many published studies within this field have been conducted... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
It has been reported that germline DICER1 mutations correlate with a distinctive human disease syndrome. Many published studies within this field have been conducted based on rare cases. We systematically searched bibliographic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and COSMIC for articles which are related to diseases covered by DICER1 syndrome. The weighted summary of mutation frequencies among patients with pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB), cystic nephroma (CN), and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor (SLCT) were calculated. Forty-nine eligible articles were included. In total, 72 cases with multimorbidity of DICER1 syndrome were identified. More females (n=46, 64%) presented with multimorbidity than males (n=18, 25%) and the remaining 8 patients' sex were unknown. Nineteen of 72 patients with multimorbidity suffered from another disease that was not yet included in DICER1 syndrome, which would provide potential phenotypes of DICER1 syndrome. The germline DICER1 mutation frequencies in PPB, CN, and SLCT were 66.9%, 73.2%, and 57.1%, respectively. The somatic DICER1 mutation frequencies of PPB, CN, and SLCT were 92.4%, 87.9%, and 43.3%, respectively. Majority of patients with multimorbidity of DICER1 syndrome were mutation positive individuals so that multimorbidity may suggest the possible germline mutation of these patients and their relatives.
Topics: DEAD-box RNA Helicases; Female; Germ-Line Mutation; Humans; Male; Mutation Rate; Nephroma, Mesoblastic; Pulmonary Blastoma; Ribonuclease III; Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumor
PubMed: 27906793
DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000715 -
Pharmacological Research Feb 2024To assess the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved KRAS inhibitors in patients with KRAS-mutated solid tumors. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved KRAS inhibitors in patients with KRAS-mutated solid tumors.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and major international conferences for clinical trials published in English up to March 6, 2023. Clinical trials investigating sotorasib or adagrasib and reporting the clinical outcomes of the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), or incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were eligible. The primary endpoint was the ORR. Secondary endpoints included the DCR, incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs, and odds ratio (OR) of the ORR between patients with or without co-mutation. The Random-effects model was applied for the outcomes of interest.
RESULTS
18 studies with 1224 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORR, DCR, and incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs were 31 % (95 % CI, 25-37 %), 86 % (95 % CI, 82-89 %), and 29 % (95 % CI, 23-36 %), respectively. KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients with a co-mutation of KEAP1 exhibited a worse ORR than those with wild-type KEAP1 (OR: 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.16-0.77).
CONCLUSIONS
This study provided a comprehensive understanding of the efficacy and safety of KRAS inhibitors in treating solid tumors and identified KEAP1 mutation as a potential predictive biomarker of inferior response in patients treated with KRAS inhibitors. These findings may assist in the design of future clinical trials for identifying populations that may benefit from KRAS inhibitor treatment.
Topics: Humans; Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); NF-E2-Related Factor 2; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Mutation; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 38185210
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107060 -
Advances in Therapy Jan 2022The canonical isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 R132 mutation (IDH1 R132) is the most frequent mutation among IDH-mutated gliomas. Non-canonical IDH1 mutations or IDH2... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The canonical isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 R132 mutation (IDH1 R132) is the most frequent mutation among IDH-mutated gliomas. Non-canonical IDH1 mutations or IDH2 mutations are unusual and their clinical and biological role is still unclear.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical role of IDH non-canonical mutations.
RESULTS
Overall, we selected 13 of 3513 studies reporting data of 4007 patients with a diagnosis of grade 2 and grade 3 glioma including 3091 patients with a molecularly proven IDH1 or IDH2 mutation. Patients with non-canonical IDH1 mutations were younger and presented a higher DNA methylation level as compared to those with canonical IDH1 R132H alteration. The overall incidence of non-canonical IDH1 mutations was 7.9% (95% CI 5.4-10.7%) in patients with IDH-mutated gliomas. There was no statistical difference in terms of incidence between patients with grade 2 or grade 3 glioma. Patients with non-canonical IDH mutations had a lower rate of 1p19q codeletion (risk difference 31%, 95% CI 23-38%) and presented a significantly prolonged survival (pooled HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.81) as compared to those with IDH1 R132H mutation.
CONCLUSION
Non-canonical IDH1 mutations occur in 7.9% of IDH-mutated gliomas and identify a specific subgroup of patients with an improved survival despite a lower rate of 1p19q codeletion. Data about the type of IDH mutation should be collected in clinical practice and within interventional trials as this could be a critical variable for improved stratification and selection of patients.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Glioma; Humans; Isocitrate Dehydrogenase; Mutation
PubMed: 34853984
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01977-3 -
World Neurosurgery Mar 2018Patients with brain tumors, particularly gliomas, commonly present with seizures. Higher incidence of seizure has been reported in low-grade gliomas and tumors located... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Patients with brain tumors, particularly gliomas, commonly present with seizures. Higher incidence of seizure has been reported in low-grade gliomas and tumors located within the temporal and insular area. The association between IDH1 and IDH2 mutations with preoperative seizures in glioma and the magnitude of this association in low-grade versus high-grade gliomas are unclear. To clarify this relationship, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed.
METHODS
Following accepted guidelines and systematic review recommendations, electronic searches were performed in journal databases up to May 2017. Data were extracted and pooled via meta-analysis.
RESULTS
We compared 782 patients with IDH1 and IDH2 mutations with 803 patients with wild-type IDH1 and IDH2 before surgery. There was a significant difference in seizure incidence between the IDH1 mutation group (61.6%) and wild-type IDH1 group (32.1%) (odds ratio 2.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-6.02; I = 73%; P = 0.01). Similar findings were observed in analysis of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations (odds ratio 2.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.74-4.33; I = 58%; P < 0.0001). The difference remained in both mutation groups (IDH1, IDH1 and IDH2) with grade II gliomas but not with grade III and IV gliomas. Patients with grade II gliomas showed a higher rate of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations and seizures than patients with grade III and IV gliomas.
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrated a significant association of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations with incidence of preoperative seizures. This association was significant only in patients with low-grade glioma (grade II) and not in patients with higher grade gliomas (grade III and IV).
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Gene Frequency; Glioma; Humans; Isocitrate Dehydrogenase; Mutation; Seizures
PubMed: 29288860
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.112 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2019Despite an increasing understanding about tumor mutation burden (TMB) in cancer immunity and cancer immunotherapy, the comprehensive cognition between TMB and...
Despite an increasing understanding about tumor mutation burden (TMB) in cancer immunity and cancer immunotherapy, the comprehensive cognition between TMB and efficiency of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is still lacking. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the predictive value of TMB on efficacy of ICIs. Systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to June 16, 2019. Pooled odds ratio (OR) of objective response rate (ORR), hazard ratio (HR) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by inverse variance weighted fixed-effects model ( ≤ 50%) or DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model ( > 50%). In addition, heterogeneity analysis, sensitivity analysis, publication bias and subgroup analysis were conducted. Moreover, fractional polynomial regression was conducted to investigate the dose-response relationship between TMB cutoffs and efficacy of ICIs. Furthermore, we assessed ORR by TMB and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression after layering each other in studies which the two could be both acquired. Three thousand six hundred fifty-seven records were retrieved through database searching, and 29 studies with 4,431 patients were finally included in the meta-analysis. TMB high group had significantly improved ORR (pooled OR 3.31, 95% CI 2.61, 4.19, < 0.001), PFS (pooled HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.49, 0.71, < 0.001) and OS (pooled HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53, 0.89, = 0.004). Sensitivity analyses illustrated the results were stable, and publication bias was identified in ORR. Subgroup analyses showed the predictive value of TMB was significant in non-small-cell lung cancer (except for the OS) and melanoma. In addition, heterogeneity was substantial in targeted next generation sequencing group but tiny in whole exome sequencing group. Furthermore, TMB and PD-L1 expression were capable to predict improved ORR of ICIs after stratification of each other, with tiny heterogeneity. High tumor mutation burden predicted improved efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancers, and targeted next generation sequencing for estimating tumor mutation burden in clinic should be standardized to eliminate heterogeneity in the future. Moreover, tumor mutation burden and programmed cell death ligand 1 expression were independent factors on predicting efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
PubMed: 31750249
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01161 -
Oncotarget Aug 2017Direct sequencing and amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) are commonly used to detect epidermal growth factor receptor () mutation status in patients with...
Comparison of direct sequencing and amplification refractory mutation system for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Direct sequencing and amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) are commonly used to detect epidermal growth factor receptor () mutation status in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer to inform the decision-making on tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment. This study aimed to systematically compare the two methods in terms of the rate of detected mutations and the association of detected mutations with clinical outcomes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (in Chinese) and Wanfang database (in Chinese) were searched to identify relevant studies. Meta-analyses of mutation rates, rate differences, and the associations of mutations with clinical outcomes of tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment were conducted.
RESULTS
Eight hundred and sixty-six records were retrieved and 26 studies with 3282 patients were included. The pooled rate of mutations detected by ARMS (41%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 35% to 47%) was significantly higher than that by direct sequencing (28%, 95%CI 22% to 34%), with a weighted rate difference of 11% (95%CI 8% to 13%). There was a consistent trend that the associations between ARMS-detected mutations and clinical outcomes were stronger than those between direct-sequencing-detected mutations and clinical outcomes (pooled risk ratio for objective response: 5.18 . 2.25; hazard ratio for progression-free survival: 0.30 . 0.42; hazard ratio for overall survival: 0.46 . 0.54).
CONCLUSIONS
More patients with mutations can be identified by ARMS than by direct sequencing, and those identified by ARMS seems to be able to benefit more from tyrosine kinase inhibitors than those identified by direct sequencing.
PubMed: 28938658
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19110 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Nov 2022The objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic melanoma using a network meta-analysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for BRAF-mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma: Results from a systematic literature review and a network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic melanoma using a network meta-analysis (NMA).
METHODS
A systematic literature review (SLR) identified studies in Medline, Embase and Cochrane published until November 2020. Screening used prespecified eligibility criteria. Following a transitivity assessment across included studies, Bayesian NMA was conducted.
RESULTS
A total of 43 publications reporting 15 targeted therapy trials and 42 reporting 18 immunotherapy trials were retained from the SLR and considered for the NMA. Due to substantial between-study heterogeneity with immunotherapy trials, the analysis considered a network restricted to targeted therapies. Among combination therapies, encorafenib + binimetinib was superior to dabrafenib + trametinib for overall response rate (OR = 1.86; 95 % credible interval [CrI] 1.10, 3.17), superior to vemurafenib + cobimetinib with fewer serious adverse events (SAEs) (OR = 0.51; 95 % CrI 0.29, 0.91) and fewer discontinuations due to AEs (OR = 0.45; 95 % CrI 0.21, 0.96), and superior to atezolizumab + vemurafenib + cobimetinib with fewer SAEs (OR = 0.41; 95 % CrI 0.21, 0.82). Atezolizumab + vemurafenib + cobimetinib and encorafenib + binimetinib were generally comparable for efficacy endpoints. Among double combination therapies, encorafenib + binimetinib showed high probabilities of being better for all efficacy and safety endpoints.
CONCLUSIONS
This NMA confirms that combination therapies are more efficacious than monotherapies. Encorafenib + binimetinib has a favourable efficacy profile compared to other double combination therapies and a favourable safety profile compared to both double and triple combination therapies.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bayes Theorem; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Humans; Melanoma; Mutation; Neoplasms, Second Primary; Network Meta-Analysis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib
PubMed: 36099854
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102463 -
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Nov 2023Anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (anti-HER2) therapy has shown excellent efficacy in patients with HER2 overexpression and amplification. Although HER2... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (anti-HER2) therapy has shown excellent efficacy in patients with HER2 overexpression and amplification. Although HER2 mutations are rarely expressed in several cancers, when they occur, they can activate the HER2 signaling pathway. In recent years, studies have shown that anti-HER2 drugs have promising efficacy in patients with HER2 mutations. Based on keywords, we searched databases, such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, and the main conference abstracts. We extracted data on objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) from studies on the efficacy of anti-HER2 therapies in patients with HER2-mutated cancers, and analyzed grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs). We included 19 single-arm clinical studies and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), containing a total of 1017 patients with HER2 mutations, involving seven drugs and nine cancers, and 18 studies enrolled a high proportion of heavily pretreated patients who had received multiple lines of therapy. Our results showed pooled ORR and CBR of 25.0% (range, 3.8-72.7%; 95% CI, 18-32%) and 36.0% (range, 8.3-63.0%; 95% CI, 31-42%) for anti-HER2 therapy in HER2-mutated cancers. The pooled median PFS, OS, DOR were 4.89 (95% CI, 4.16-5.62), 12.78 (95% CI, 10.24-15.32), and 8.12 (95% CI, 6.48-9.75) months, respectively. In a subgroup analysis, we analyzed the ORR for different cancers, showing 27.0, 25.0, 23.0, and 16.0% for breast, lung, cervical, and biliary tract cancers, respectively. ORR analyses were performed for different drugs as monotherapy or in combination, showing 60.0% for trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), 31.0% for pyrotinib, 26.0% for neratinib combined with trastuzumab, 25.0% for neratinib combined with fulvestrant, 19.0% for trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab, and 16.0% for neratinib. In addition, we found that diarrhoea, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were the most common grade ≥ 3 AEs associated with anti-HER2 therapeutic agents. In this meta-analysis of heavily pretreated patients with HER2 mutations, anti-HER2 therapies, DS-8201 and trastuzumab emtansine, showed promising efficacy and activity. Anti-HER2 therapies showed different efficacies in different or the same cancer settings and all had a tolerable safety profile.
Topics: Humans; Female; Trastuzumab; Receptor, ErbB-2; Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37120775
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-023-01072-7