-
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy 2024Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Rucaparib, a PARP inhibitor (PARPi), in patients with ovarian cancer and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Safety and efficacy of Rucaparib in the treatment of ovarian cancer and patients with BRCA mutation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized clinical trials.
INTRODUCTION
Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Rucaparib, a PARP inhibitor (PARPi), in patients with ovarian cancer and BRCA mutation.
METHODS
Online databases were comprehensively searched for all phase III Randomized trials that used Rucaparib therapy for ovarian cancer patients and patients having BRCA mutation. Efficacy results are progression-free survival and overall response rate in addition to addressing its safety concerns.
RESULTS
After pooling data from 4 clinical trials, the analysis showed a significant improvement in PFS among ovarian cancer patients and for the maintenance therapy with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.49 (95% CI 0.34-0.73, = 0.0003) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.29-0.62, < 0.0001), respectively. For patients with BRCA mutations, the PFS showed significant improvement with a (HR) of 0.42 (95% CI 0.25-0.71, < 0.001). A difference was observed in the risk of grade ≥ 3 TEAEs between the two groups (RR = 2.48; 95% CI 1.40-4.37).
CONCLUSION
Rucaparib demonstrated significant efficacy in improving PFS and ORR in ovarian cancer patients, particularly those having BRCA mutations. However, they should be closely monitored due to the greater risk of various adverse effects.
Topics: Humans; Female; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ovarian Neoplasms; Indoles; Mutation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
PubMed: 38252024
DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2309177 -
European Journal of Medical Research Aug 2023The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from epidermal growth factor receptor... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to aggregate the clinical outcomes of patients with LM from EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with osimertinib. A comprehensive literature search for published and unpublished studies was implemented in April 2021 of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and several international conference databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to calculate the pooled rate of overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), one-year overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS
A total of eleven studies (five prospective and six retrospective) including 353 patients were included. The majority of patients (346/353, 98.0%) received osimertinib as ≥ 2nd-line treatment for LM, either at a dosage of 80 mg (161/353, 45.6%) or 160 mg (191/353, 54.1%). The pooled rates of ORR and DCR were 42% (95% CI 24% to 59%) and 93% (95% CI 88% to 97%), respectively. The pooled one-year OS rate was 59% (95% CI 53% to 65%) in 233 patients from five studies. The highest incidence of AEs of all grades was rash (53%), followed by diarrhea (45%), paronychia (35%), decreased appetite (35%), and dry skin (27%), based on data from four studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study highlighted and confirmed the meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile of osimertinib for the treatment of LM from EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Antineoplastic Agents; ErbB Receptors; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Mutation
PubMed: 37542339
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01219-y -
BMC Pediatrics Oct 2023Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) is an autosomal recessive disease which results in inherited bone marrow failure (IBMF) and is characterized by exocrine pancreatic...
BACKGROUND
Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) is an autosomal recessive disease which results in inherited bone marrow failure (IBMF) and is characterized by exocrine pancreatic dysfunction and diverse clinical phenotypes. In the present study, we reviewed the internationally published reports on SDS patients, in order to summarize the clinical features, epidemiology, and treatment of SDS.
METHODS
We searched the WangFang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases with the keywords "Shwachman-Diamond syndrome," "SDS," "SBDS gene" and "inherited bone marrow failure" for relevant articles published from January 2002 to October 2022. In addition, studies published from January 2002 to October 2022 were searched from the Web of Science, PubMed, and MEDLINE databases, using "Shwachman-diamond syndrome" as the keyword. Finally, one child with SDS treated in Tongji Hospital was also included.
RESULTS
The clinical features of 156 patients with SDS were summarized. The three major clinical features of SDS were found to be peripheral blood cytopenia (96.8%), exocrine pancreatic dysfunction (83.3%), and failure to thrive (83.3%). The detection rate of SDS mutations was 94.6% (125/132). Mutations in SBDS, DNAJC21, SRP54, ELF6, and ELF1 have been reported. The male-to-female ratio was approximately 1.3/1. The median age of onset was 0.16 years, but the diagnostic age lagged by a median age of 1.3 years.
CONCLUSIONS
Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and growth failure were common initial symptoms. SDS onset occurred early in childhood, and individual differences were obvious. Comprehensive collection and analysis of case-related data can help clinicians understand the clinical characteristics of SDS, which may improve early diagnosis and promote effective clinical intervention.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Bone Marrow Diseases; Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency; Mutation; Phenotype; Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome; Signal Recognition Particle
PubMed: 37803383
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-023-04324-3 -
Surgery For Obesity and Related... Jan 2018Portomesenteric and splenic vein thrombosis (PMSVT) is a rare but potentially serious complication after bariatric surgery. No study has systematically analyzed its... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Portomesenteric and splenic vein thrombosis (PMSVT) is a rare but potentially serious complication after bariatric surgery. No study has systematically analyzed its incidence and risk factors.
OBJECTIVES
To pool the data regarding PMSVT after bariatric surgery and determine its incidence and risk factors.
METHODS
A meta-analysis and systematic review was conducted to retrieve studies on PMSVT after bariatric surgery.
RESULTS
A total of 41 eligible studies including 110 patients with postbariatric PMSVT were enrolled; the estimated incidence rate based on 13 studies was .4%. The use of oral contraception was reported in 35.4% of patients, previous surgery in 61.1%, smoking in 37.2%, and history of coagulopathy in 43%. PMSVT mostly occurred after sleeve gastrectomy (78.9%) and within the first postoperative month (88.9%). Pneumoperitoneum pressure was>15 mm Hg in 6% of patients. The portal vein was the most commonly affected vessel (41.5%). Prothrombin 20210 mutation and protein C/S deficiency were the most common thrombophilic conditions. Unfractionated heparin (59.1%), vitamin K antagonists (50.9%), and low molecular weight heparin (39.1%) were the most common treatments for PMSVT. The morbidity and mortality rates for postbariatric PMSVT were 8.2% and 3.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
PMSVT usually occurs within the first postoperative month and is mostly reported after sleeve gastrectomy. The portal vein is the most commonly involved vessel. A previous hypercoagulable state can be an important risk factor. Most patients can be treated with anticoagulation therapy. Further studies with comprehensive data review of patient information are required.
Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Bariatric Surgery; Blood Coagulation Disorders; Contraceptives, Oral; Female; Humans; Male; Mesenteric Veins; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Portal Vein; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Smoking; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 29111221
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.09.512 -
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum Aug 2012: The K-ras gene is one of the commonly mutated oncogenes associated with colorectal cancer. However, its prognostic significance for patients with colorectal cancer... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
: The K-ras gene is one of the commonly mutated oncogenes associated with colorectal cancer. However, its prognostic significance for patients with colorectal cancer remains inconclusive.
OBJECTIVE
: To derive a more precise estimation of the prognostic significance of K-ras gene mutations, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed.
DATA SOURCES
: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases from January 1992 to November 2011.
STUDY SELECTION
: The prognostic value of K-ras gene mutations was examined in patients with colorectal cancer who did not receive preoperative chemotherapy or radiation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
: The effect of K-ras gene mutations on the overall survival was measured by the HR and 95% CIs.
RESULTS
: The pooled HR for the association between K-ras gene mutations and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer was 1.04 (95% CI: 0.99-1.10, p = 0.11). Subgroup analysis showed significant reductions in the overall survival associated with mutations at K-ras codon 12, the articles that reported HR directly, and the studies published before and after 2005, although publication bias was present. All the associations disappeared after adjustment with the trim-and-fill method. The pooled HR of 3 studies examining mutations at K-ras codon 13 was 1.47 (95% CI: 1.09-1.97, p = 0.02), and no publication bias was observed. No significant association was observed in different study regions.
LIMITATIONS
: The heterogeneity in the study populations is a potential problem, the use of different staging systems or small groups of different stages may contribute to heterogeneity, and residual confounding may have influenced the results in those studies that did not completely adjust for other factors.
CONCLUSIONS
: Overall K-ras gene mutations seem not to correlate with the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. The association remains to be confirmed with a more precise analysis of a large sample.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Colorectal Neoplasms; Genes, ras; Genetic Markers; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Models, Statistical; Point Mutation; Prognosis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Survival Rate; ras Proteins
PubMed: 22810479
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318251d8d9 -
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer Apr 2024Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) represent an option in selected cases of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of the present... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) represent an option in selected cases of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of approved (Olaparib, Rucaparib) and investigational (Talazoparib, Niraparib, Veliparib) PARPi in mCRPC patients. Three databases were queried for studies analyzing oncological outcomes and adverse events of mCRPC patients receiving PARPi. Primary outcome was a PSA decline ≥ 50% from baseline. Secondary outcomes were objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), radiological PFS, overall survival (OS), conversion of circulating tumor cell count, and time to PSA progression. The number and rate of any grade adverse events (AEs), grade ≥ 3 AEs, and most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were registered. A subanalysis of outcomes per mutation type, prospective trials, and studies adopting combination therapies was performed. Overall, 31 studies were included in this systematic review, 28 of which are available for meta-analysis. The most frequently investigated drug was Olaparib. The most frequent mutation was BRCA2. A PSA decline rate of 43% (95% CI 0.32-0.54) was observed in the overall population. Mean OS was 15.9 (95% CI 12.9-19.0) months. In BRCA2 patients, PSA decline rate was 66% (95% CI 0.57-0.7) and OS 23.4 months (95% CI 22.8-24.1). Half of the patients suffered from grade 3 and 4 AEs (0.50 [95% CI 0.39-0.60]). Most common AEs were hematological, the most frequent being anemia (21.5%). PARP inhibitors represent a viable option for mCRPC patients. Current evidence suggests an increased effectiveness in homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutation carriers, especially BRCA2.
Topics: Male; Humans; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prospective Studies; Mutation
PubMed: 38281877
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.12.011 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022Duvelisib is the first FDA-approved oral dual inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase PI3K-delta (PI3K-δ) and PI3K-gamma (PI3K-γ). Although many clinical studies... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Safety and efficacy of dual PI3K-δ, γ inhibitor, duvelisib in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoid neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.
BACKGROUND
Duvelisib is the first FDA-approved oral dual inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase PI3K-delta (PI3K-δ) and PI3K-gamma (PI3K-γ). Although many clinical studies support the efficacy of duvelisib, the safety of duvelisib remains with great attention. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of duvelisib in treating different relapsed or refractory (RR) lymphoid neoplasm types.
METHODS
We searched prospective clinical trials from PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. For efficacy analysis, Overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CR), partial response rate (PR), rate of stable disease (SDR), rate of progressive disease (PDR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), 12-/24-month PFS, and 12-month overall survival (OS) were assessed. For safety analysis, the incidences of any grade and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and treatment-related discontinuation and death were evaluated. Subgroup analysis based on the disease type was performed.
RESULTS
We included 11 studies and 683 patients, including 305 chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), 187 B-cell indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL), 39 B-cell aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aNHL), and 152 T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (T-NHL) patients. The pooled ORR in CLL/SLL, iNHL, aNHL and T-NHL was 70%, 70%, 28% and 47%, respectively. Additionally, the pooled ORR in CLL/SLL patients with or without TP53 mutation/17p-deletion (62% vs. 74%, p=0.45) and in follicular lymphoma (FL) or other iNHL (69% vs. 57%, p=0.38) had no significant differences. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients had higher pooled ORR than other aNHL (68% vs. 17%, p=0.04). Angioimmunoblastic TCL (AITL) patients had higher pooled ORR than other PTCL patients (67% vs. 42%, p=0.01). The pooled incidence of any grade, grade ≥3, serious AEs, treatment-related discontinuation and death was 99%, 79%, 63%, 33% and 3%, respectively. The most frequent any-grade AEs were diarrhea (47%), ALT/AST increase (39%), and neutropenia (38%). The most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (25%), ALT/AST increased (16%), diarrhea (12%), and anemia (12%).
CONCLUSION
Generally, duvelisib could offer favorable efficacy in patients with RR CLL/SLL, iNHL, MCL, and AITL. Risk and severity in duvelisib treatment may be mitigated through proper identification and management.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Prospective Studies; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Lymphoma, B-Cell; Neutropenia; Diarrhea
PubMed: 36685572
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1070660 -
PloS One 2013K-ras gene mutations were common in colorectal patients, but their relationship with prognosis was unclear. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
K-ras gene mutations were common in colorectal patients, but their relationship with prognosis was unclear.
OBJECTIVE
Verify prognostic differences between patient with and without mutant K-ras genes by reviewing the published evidence.
METHOD
Systematic reviews and data bases were searched for cohort/case-control studies of prognosis of colorectal cancer patients with detected K-ras mutations versus those without mutant K-ras genes, both of whom received chemotherapy. Number of patients, regimens of chemotherapy, and short-term or long-term survival rate (disease-free or overall) were extracted. Quality of studies was also evaluated.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
7 studies of comparisons with a control group were identified. No association between K-ras gene status with neither short-term disease free-survival (OR=1.01, 95% CI, 0.73-1.38, P=0.97) nor overall survival (OR=1.06, 95% CI, 0.82-1.36, P=0.66) in CRC patients who received chemotherapy was indicated. Comparison of long-term survival between two groups also indicated no significant difference after heterogeneity was eliminated (OR=1.09, 95% CI, 0.85-1.40, P=0.49).
CONCLUSIONS
K-ras gene mutations may not be a prognostic index for colorectal cancer patients who received chemotherapy.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Case-Control Studies; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Mutation; Prognosis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Survival Rate; ras Proteins
PubMed: 24205021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077901 -
Cancer Treatment and Research... 2020KRAS (Kirsten Rat Sarcoma) is the most common oncogenic mutation detected in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the role of KRAS as either a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
KRAS (Kirsten Rat Sarcoma) is the most common oncogenic mutation detected in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the role of KRAS as either a prognostic factor or predictive factor (modifier of treatment effects) in NSCLC is not well established at this time. This systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis synthesized the available evidence regarding the role of KRAS mutation as a predictive factor and/or prognostic factor of survival and response outcomes in patients with advanced/metastatic (stage IIIB-IV) NSCLC. Relevant clinical trials and observational studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Meta-analyses were performed using data extracted from multivariable and univariable analyses from clinical studies to assess the empirical evidence of KRAS mutation status as a prognostic or/and predicitive factor. 43 selected studies were identified by the SLR and included in this meta-analysis. Pairwise meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) did not demonstrate a significant prognostic effect of mutant KRAS on overall survival (OS) (HR=1.10; 95% CI [0.88, 1.38]) or progression free survival (PFS) (HR=1.03; 95% CI [0.80, 1.33]). However, when conducting meta-analyses on HRs reported in observational studies, a statistically significant negative prognostic effect of mutant KRAS was observed (OS HR=1.71; 95% CI [1.07, 2.84]; PFS HR=1.18; 95% CI [1.02, 1.36]). Meta-analyses of objective response rate (ORR) in RCTs demonstrated a negative prognostic effect of mutant KRAS (RR=0.38; 95% CI [0.16, 0.63]). Limited data were available to evaluate the role of KRAS mutation as a predictive factor. In conclusion, this research offers evidence that KRAS mutation may be a negative prognostic factor for survival and response outcomes in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, but further research is needed to address conflicting results on the importance of KRAS mutations as a predictive factor.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; DNA Mutational Analysis; ErbB Receptors; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Neoplasm Staging; Observational Studies as Topic; Prognosis; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 32750661
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100200 -
Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2023The current gold standard treatment for canine mast cell tumors (MCT) uses vinblastine sulfate (VBL) as chemotherapy, although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have...
UNLABELLED
The current gold standard treatment for canine mast cell tumors (MCT) uses vinblastine sulfate (VBL) as chemotherapy, although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have recently been shown to be worthy candidates for treatment. This systematic review aimed to analyze the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and complete (CR) or partial response (PR) in dogs with MCT treated with TKI compared to standard VBL treatment. The systematic review was registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF) database under the identifier 10.17605/OSF.IO/WYPN4 (https://osf.io/). An electronic search was performed in nine databases. References from eligible studies were also selected to find more registers. A total of 28 studies met the eligibility criteria, and one more was recovered from the references of eligible studies, totaling 29 selected studies. The overall response rate, complete response, and partial response were higher in dogs treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors than in dogs treated with vinblastine. The overall survival and progression-free survival of vinblastine-treated dogs were higher compared to tyrosine kinase inhibitors-treated dogs. Dogs with mutated KIT treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors have longer overall survival and progression-free survival compared to those treated with vinblastine. It is important to consider the limitation of the study which should temper the interpretation of the results, videlicet, the extracted data lacked sample standardization and included variables such as animal characteristics, mutation detection methods, tumor characteristics, and treatment types which may have influenced the outcome of the study.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://osf.io/, identifier: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WYPN4.
PubMed: 37360406
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1188795