-
CNS & Neurological Disorders Drug... 2023Vitamin D has been extensively studied for its role in immune modulation, especially in the process of tolerance induction. The loss of tolerance towards self-antigens... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Vitamin D has been extensively studied for its role in immune modulation, especially in the process of tolerance induction. The loss of tolerance towards self-antigens is the basis of several autoimmune disorders; this seems to be related to lower levels of Vitamin D. A neurological autoimmune disorder due to the loss of tolerance to compounds at the neuromuscular junction is known as Myasthenia Gravis (MG).
OBJECTIVE
To assess the possible correlation between altered Vitamin D levels and MG.
METHODS
In this systematic review, all recruited studies compared Vitamin D levels in MG patients and healthy controls. Five studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the quantitative synthesis. The meta-analysis involved data of a total population size of 450 individuals, equally divided into 219 cases and 231 controls.
RESULTS
The results showed a statistically significant mean difference between cases and controls. The overall mean Vitamin D levels in MG patients were 4.69 ng/ml lower than control levels (95% CI -6.17; -3.22); by applying a random-effects model, this mean difference was estimated at -3.79 (95% CI -7.24; -0.33), after exclusion of data source of heterogeneity and through applying a fixed-effect model, resulted in a mean difference -5.39 (95% CI -6.91; -3.88). The p-value was lower than 0.05.
CONCLUSION
There are statistically significant lower levels of Vitamin D in MG patients, so routine checking and possible correction should be advised in MG patients based on the current data.
Topics: Humans; Vitamin D; Vitamins; Myasthenia Gravis
PubMed: 35796450
DOI: 10.2174/1871527321666220707111344 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2021The studies have produced contradictory results regarding the association between myasthenia gravis (MG) and cognitive function, especially for the cognitive domains of...
The studies have produced contradictory results regarding the association between myasthenia gravis (MG) and cognitive function, especially for the cognitive domains of memory. This meta-analysis was dedicated to exploring the association between MG and memory, which was represented by the immediate recall and delayed recall. Using the random effects models, this study analyzed memory in MG based on data from the studies retrieved from four electronic databases from inception to February 2021. Disease severity was graded according to the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) classification. We defined ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) (MGFA Grade I) as Class I, mild, and moderate generalized myasthenia gravis (GMG) (MGFA Grade IIa, IIb, IIIa, and IIIb) as Class II. In total, eight studies of 274 patients and 211 healthy controls were included. The significant associations were found between MG and memory. Compared with the healthy control group, the patients with MG performed significantly worse in the terms of immediate recall [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.65, 95% = -0.97 to -0.33, < 0.001, = 64.1%] and delayed recall (SMD = -0.49, 95% = -0.88 to -0.1, < 0.05, = 76.3%). Compared with the patients with Class I MG, those with Class II MG did not have significantly different scores in immediate recall (SMD = -0.07, 95% CI = -0.35 to 0.21, = 0.614, = 0%) and delayed recall (SMD = 0.63, 95% = -0.29 to 1.55, = 0.178, = 87.9%). The patients with MG showed lower memory performance, such as both immediate and delayed recall ability. There was no association between the severity of MG and memory. Future studies should address whether these associations are casual and modifiable.
PubMed: 34867702
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.680141 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2023Juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) is a rare autoimmune disease that has so far only been described in small cohort studies. We defined the clinical characteristics,...
BACKGROUND
Juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) is a rare autoimmune disease that has so far only been described in small cohort studies. We defined the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of JMG patients over the past 22 years.
METHODS
A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and web of science (1/2000-2/2022) identified all English language and human studies of JMG. The population was patients diagnosed with JMG. Outcomes included the history of myasthenic crisis, autoimmune comorbidity, mortality, and treatment outcome. Data extraction was performed by independent reviewers. And we performed a pooled reanalysis of all published data in the included studies and compared with other studies of adult cohorts.
RESULTS
We identified 11 articles describing 1,109 patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2021. JMG occurred in 60.4% of female patients. The mean age at presentation was 7.38 years old, and 60.6% of the patients had ocular symptoms as the first clinical manifestation. The most common initial presentation was ptosis, which occurred in 77.7% patients. AchR-Ab positive accounted for 78.7%. 641 patients received thymus examination, found to have thymic hyperplasia in 64.9% and thymoma in 2.2%. Autoimmune comorbidity was found in 13.6% and the most common one is thyroid disease (61.5%). First-line therapy, including pyridostigmine and steroids, was initiated in 97.8 and 68.6%, respectively. Six patients resolved spontaneously without treatment. Thymectomy was performed in 45.6%. 10.6% of patients had a history of myasthenic crisis. Completely stable remission was achieved in 23.7% and mortality was reported in 2 studies, which reported 8 deaths.
CONCLUSION
JMG is a rare disease with a relatively benign course, and differs from adult MG in some clinical features. The treatment regimen guideline for children is still not well-established. There is a need for prospective studies to properly evaluate treatment regimes.
PubMed: 36970540
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1119294 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2021Approximately 10-20% of patients WITH myasthenia gravis (MG) are refractory to conventional immunotherapies. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic...
Approximately 10-20% of patients WITH myasthenia gravis (MG) are refractory to conventional immunotherapies. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the optimal therapies for refractory MG. Correlative studies were performed through a search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The primary outcome was defined by changes in the quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMG). Secondary outcomes were defined by the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL), Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) post intervention status, adverse events, and disease exacerbation after treatment. A total of 16 studies were included with 403 patients with refractory MG on therapies with rituximab, eculizumab, tacrolimus, and cladribine. Therapeutic efficacy of rituximab and eculizumab was identified with an estimated reduction in QMG score (4.158 vs. 6.928) and MG-ADL (4.400 vs. 4.344), respectively. No significant changes were revealed in efficacy or exacerbation density between the two independent therapeutic cohorts. The estimated adverse event density of eculizumab was more significant than that in the rituximab group (1.195 vs. 0.134 per patient-year), while the estimated serious event density was similar. The efficacy and safety of rituximab and eculizumab have been approved in patients with refractory MG. Rituximab had a superior safety profile than eculizumab with a lower incidence of adverse events. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021236818, identifier CRD42021236818.
PubMed: 34925206
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.725700 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2019During the past years biologic agents (also termed biologicals or biologics) have become a crucial treatment option in immunological diseases. Numerous articles have...
During the past years biologic agents (also termed biologicals or biologics) have become a crucial treatment option in immunological diseases. Numerous articles have been published on biologicals, which complicates the decision making process on the use of the most appropriate biologic for a given immune-mediated disease. This systematic review is the first of a series of articles assessing the safety and efficacy of B cell-targeting biologics for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases. To evaluate rituximab's safety and efficacy for the treatment of immune-mediated disorders compared to placebo, conventional treatment, or other biologics. The PRISMA checklist guided the reporting of the data. We searched the PubMed database between 4 October 2016 and 26 July 2018 concentrating on immune-mediated disorders. The literature search identified 19,665 articles. After screening titles and abstracts against the inclusion and exclusion criteria and assessing full texts, 105 articles were finally included in a narrative synthesis. Rituximab is both safe and effective for the treatment of acquired angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency, ANCA-associated vasculitis, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, Behçet's disease, bullous pemphigoid, Castleman's disease, cryoglobulinemia, Goodpasture's disease, IgG4-related disease, immune thrombocytopenia, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, nephrotic syndrome, neuromyelitis optica, pemphigus, rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathy, and systemic sclerosis. Conversely, rituximab failed to show an effect for antiphospholipid syndrome, autoimmune hepatitis, IgA nephropathy, inflammatory myositis, primary-progressive multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and ulcerative colitis. Finally, mixed results were reported for membranous nephropathy, primary Sjögren's syndrome and Graves' disease, therefore warranting better quality trials with larger patient numbers.
Topics: Animals; Antigens, CD20; B-Lymphocytes; Disease Progression; Humans; Immune System Diseases; Immunotherapy; Lymphocyte Depletion; Rituximab; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31555262
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01990 -
Association between myasthenia gravis and cognitive function: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology 2015The course of myasthenia gravis (MG) is complicated by increased reports of cognitive defects in both human and animal models, which suggests potential central nervous... (Review)
Review
The course of myasthenia gravis (MG) is complicated by increased reports of cognitive defects in both human and animal models, which suggests potential central nervous system (CNS) damage. We conducted a systematic review of the relationships between MG and cognitive function. This systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Major databases were searched to examine the neuropsychological studies of adults with MG. Weighted effect sizes were pooled by cognitive domain. Eight studies representing 300 subjects were included. Eight cognitive domain categories were identified: (i) Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), (ii) language, (iii) processing speed, (iv) verbal learning and memory, (v) visual learning and memory, (vi) attention span, (vii) response fluency, and (viii) motor performance. Nine (cognitive domain categories, MMSE, language, processing speed, verbal learning and memory (except for delayed recall memory), and motor performance) of 16 cognitive tasks revealed significant moderate effect sizes. Verbal logical-delayed memory, finger tapping with the preferred hand, and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test showed a greater magnitude relationship to cognitive function than did other specific cognitive domains. Verbal learning and memory seems to be the most significant affected according to cognitive domain categories. For MG, the ability of attention, response fluency, visual learning, and memory seems to be reserved. The MG patients seem to perform significantly worse than the non-MG controls in a range of cognitive domains. Our findings should be interpreted with caution because of the clinical and methodological heterogeneity of included studies.
PubMed: 26019407
DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.156560 -
Neuroepidemiology 2020Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease whose period of typical onset is around 20-40 years (i.e., early onset), thus in the peak of working age, or around 60-80... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease whose period of typical onset is around 20-40 years (i.e., early onset), thus in the peak of working age, or around 60-80 years (i.e., late onset). However, the information on work-related issues and employment status are sparse and not systematically reported. Therefore, we performed a systematic literature review with meta-analysis to address the employment status of MG patients.
METHODS
We searched for papers reporting employment status on participants with MG published between January 2000 and May 2019. Information on employment was extracted. Random-effects models were used to produce meta-analytic estimates for the proportion of employed patients.
RESULTS
In total, 1,045 records were retrieved, of which 19 fitted the inclusion criteria. In total, 3,600 participants (average age 47.5, range 35-60) were included in the studies and 1,579 of them were employed. The proportion of employed patients varied from 28 to 82%, with an extreme heterogeneity between studies. Overall, the pooled proportion of workers was 50% (95% CI 41-60%). Subgroup analyses suggested a possible, although not significant, higher proportion of workers among women, younger participants, those with a higher level of education, shorter MG duration, and less frequently thymectomized, whereas a lower proportion was observed among those with generalized, bulbar, and respiratory symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of our meta-analysis show that the percentage of employment is considerably low if we take into account that the mean age of MG patients involved in the included studies was around 48 years, thus in peak of working life. Therefore, it is important to understand what kind of influence MG exerts on work dynamics.
Topics: Adult; Employment; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myasthenia Gravis
PubMed: 32097937
DOI: 10.1159/000506310 -
Neurology Oct 2023Ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) is an autoimmune disorder resulting in ocular symptoms such as diplopia and ptosis. The proportion of patients who convert to secondary... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) is an autoimmune disorder resulting in ocular symptoms such as diplopia and ptosis. The proportion of patients who convert to secondary generalized myasthenia gravis (SGMG) reported in the literature has been varied. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the clinical characteristics of patients with OMG and the proportion of SGMG conversion.
METHODS
We conducted an electronic database search for randomized controlled trials, prospective nonrandomized studies, observational studies, and retrospective studies in EMBASE, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. We included studies with patients with OMG who initially presented with ocular symptoms and signs only and were seen in clinical practice, reporting on the characteristics and outcomes of SGMG. We excluded studies with pediatric and congenital myasthenia gravis populations. Eligible studies included articles written in any language and containing data on patients with OMG. The main outcome measured was the proportion of patients with OMG who converted to SGMG and risk factors associated with secondary generalization of OMG. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and extracted data from full texts, reporting findings according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The methodology was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal forms. PROSPERO registration number: CRD2021285257.
RESULTS
Thirty-one studies were included in the quantitative and qualitative analysis. The proportion of generalization ranged from 11% to 84%. The pooled proportion was 39% (95% CI 32%-47%, = 95.86%, < 0.001 unweighted, low certainty). The pooled risk ratio of female sex for conversion to SGMG was 1.06 (95% CI 0.96-1.17, = 0% = 0.614, 21 studies included, very low certainty), and the pooled risk ratio of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) positivity was 1.30 (95% CI 1.05-1.56, = 0% = 0.455, 16 studies included, very low certainty).
DISCUSSION
Risk factors such as female sex and anti-AChR positivity have been identified to have possible associations with SGMG, but there are not enough quality observational studies. There is a need for a prospective global database of patients with OMG, including all countries with different populations.
Topics: Humans; Female; Child; Retrospective Studies; Myasthenia Gravis; Receptors, Cholinergic; Risk Factors; Blepharoptosis
PubMed: 37643888
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207642 -
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Feb 2022Recent studies suggest that the clinical course and outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and myasthenia gravis (MG) are highly variable. We...
OBJECTIVE
Recent studies suggest that the clinical course and outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and myasthenia gravis (MG) are highly variable. We performed a systematic review of the relevant literature with a key aim to assess the outcomes of invasive ventilation, mortality, and hospital length of stay (HLoS) for patients presenting with MG and COVID-19.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and MedRxiv databases for original articles that reported patients with MG and COVID-19. We included all clinical studies that reported MG in patients with confirmed COVID-19 cases via RT-PCR tests. We collected data on patient background characteristics, symptoms, time between MG and COVID-19 diagnosis, MG and COVID-19 treatments, HLoS, and mortality at last available follow-up. We reported summary statistics as counts and percentages or mean±SD. When necessary, inverse variance weighting was used to aggregate patient-level data and summary statistics.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies with 152 patients (mean age 54.4 ± 12.7 years; 79/152 [52.0%] female) were included. Hypertension (62/141, 44.0%) and diabetes (30/141, 21.3%) were the most common comorbidities. The mean time between the diagnosis of MG and COVID-19 was7.0 ± 6.3 years. Diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed in all patients via RT-PCR tests. Fever (40/59, 67.8%) and ptosis (9/55, 16.4%) were the most frequent COVID-19 and MG symptoms, respectively. Azithromycin and ceftriaxone were the most common COVID-19 treatments, while prednisone and intravenous immunoglobulin were the most common MG treatments. Invasive ventilation treatment was required for 25/59 (42.4%) of patients. The mean HLoS was 18.2 ± 9.9 days. The mortality rate was 18/152 (11.8%).
CONCLUSION
This report provides an overview of the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of MG in COVID-19 patients. Although COVID-19 may exaggerate the neurological symptoms and worsens the outcome in MG patients, we did not find enough evidence to support this notion. Further studies with larger numbers of patients with MG and COVID-19 are needed to better assess the clinical outcomes in these patients.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; COVID-19; Child; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myasthenia Gravis; Respiration, Artificial; Survival Rate; Young Adult
PubMed: 35091255
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107140 -
Integrative Medicine Research Jun 2022Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a disorder of neuromuscular transmission bringing mild ocular weakness to severe generalized muscle weakness and disability. The conventional... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a disorder of neuromuscular transmission bringing mild ocular weakness to severe generalized muscle weakness and disability. The conventional treatments have long-term side effects, and Chinese herbal medicines (CHM) have shown possible effect and safety for MG patients, but the existing evidence was not robust enough and the results were out of date.
METHODS
Searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in 7 databases and clinical trial registries until July 2021. The ROB 2 tool was used to assess the study quality and GRADE was used to assess the quality of whole evidence. Meta-analyses were conducted and the results were presented as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Nineteen RCTs (1283 participants) testing 13 kinds of CHM with adequate randomization were included and six RCTs investigating Compound Huangqi were included in the meta-analyses. In addition to conventional treatment, nine CHMs reduced symptom scores of MG. Compound Huangqi plus conventional treatment (pyridostigmine bromide or prednisone or both) reduced the symptom scores compared with conventional treatment (MD = -3.56, 95%CI -4.86 to -2.26). Less adverse events happened in the CHM groups (3/247 in the CHM groups, 52/245 in the control groups, RR = 0.13, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.30, 9 RCTs, a total of 492 participants). The effect on quality of life was inconsistent.
CONCLUSION
Nine CHMs could probably bring benefit for MG symptom improvement. Moderate to low certainty of evidence supported Compound Huangqi added-on conventional treatment probably bring extra benefit of improving MG symptoms. Adding CHMs could be safer than giving only conventional treatment.
STUDY REGISTRATION
The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: 32718).
PubMed: 35024335
DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2021.100806