-
Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Dec 2023The meta-analysis sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of venetoclax (Ven) and azacitidine (AZA) in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The efficacy and safety of venetoclax and azacytidine combination treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
The meta-analysis sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of venetoclax (Ven) and azacitidine (AZA) in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for eligible studies from inception to June 2022. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) to evaluate the quality of the included literature. The inverse variance method was used to calculate the pooled proportion and 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included nineteen studies with a total of 1615 patients. The pooled overall CR/CRi (complete response (CR)/complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi)) rate for AML and MDS was 57.9% (95% CI 49.5-65.9%, I = 83%). Subgroup analyses showed that the rate of pooled CR/CRi was 67.5% (95% CI 61.1-73.3%, I = 54%) for the new-diagnosed (ND) AML group, 30% (95% CI 20-44.1%, I = 66%) for relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML, and 67.6% (95% CI 52.6-79.8%, I = 65%) for MDS, respectively. One randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed that CR/CRi was 64.7% in ND-AML patients. A total of 9 studies reported adverse events, with neutropenia being the most common of grade 3-4 adverse events, with a rate of 53.7% (95% CI 61.1-73.3%, I = 54%).
CONCLUSION
The present meta-analysis demonstrated that the Ven + AZA regimen is efficacious for the treatment of AML and MDS, with it being more effective for ND-AML than R/R AML. The most common adverse effects of this regimen are grade 3-4 neutropenia and neutropenia with fever.
Topics: Humans; Azacitidine; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Neutropenia
PubMed: 37036307
DOI: 10.1080/16078454.2023.2198098 -
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) Nov 2023To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of current treatment strategies for the vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of current treatment strategies for the vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome.
METHODS
A protocolized systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed. Three databases were searched for reports on treatment strategies for VEXAS. Data from the included publications was extracted and a narrative synthesis was performed. Treatment response was recorded as complete (CR), partial (PR) or none (NR) depending on changes in clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters. Patient characteristics, safety data and previous treatments were analysed.
RESULTS
We identified 36 publications with a total of 116 patients; 113 (98.3%) were male. The identified reports included azacytidine (CR 9/36, 25%; PR 14/36, 38.9%), Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) (CR 11/33, 33%; PR 9/33, 27.3%), tocilizumab (CR 3/15, 20%; PR 6/15, 40%), allogeneic stem cell transplantation (CR 6/7, 85.7%; one patient died), anakinra (CR 4/5, 80%; NR 1/5, 20%), canakinumab (CR 1/2, 50%; PR 1/2, 50%) and glucocorticoid monotherapy (CR 1/6, 16.7%; PR 4/6, 66.7%). Individual reports were available for TNF inhibitors, rituximab and MTX. Data on adverse events were available for 67 patients (67/116, 57.8%) and included: pneumonia (12/67, 17.9%), other infections (9/67, 13.4%), venous thromboembolisms (6/67, 8.9%), cytopenias (4/67, 5.9%), and acute (4/67, 5.9%) and chronic graft-vs-host-disease (2/67, 2.9%).
CONCLUSION
Current data on VEXAS treatment are limited and inhomogeneous. Treatment decisions should be individualized. For the devolvement of treatment algorithms clinical trials are needed. Adverse events remain a challenge, especially an elevated risk for venous thromboembolism associated to JAKi treatment should be carefully considered.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Algorithms; Azacitidine; Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome; Databases, Factual; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Mutation
PubMed: 37233149
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead240 -
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Oct 2015To update the 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs). (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To update the 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs).
METHODS
The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Update Committee and conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews from October 2005 through September 2014. Guideline recommendations were based on the review of the evidence by the Update Committee.
RESULTS
Changes to previous recommendations include the addition of tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz, moderation of the recommendation regarding routine use of CSFs in older patients with diffuse aggressive lymphoma, and addition of recommendations against routine dose-dense chemotherapy in lymphoma and in favor of high-dose-intensity chemotherapy in urothelial cancer. The Update Committee did not address recommendations regarding use of CSFs in acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes in adults.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Prophylactic use of CSFs to reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia is warranted when the risk of febrile neutropenia is approximately 20% or higher and no other equally effective and safe regimen that does not require CSFs is available. Primary prophylaxis is recommended for the prevention of febrile neutropenia in patients who are at high risk on the basis of age, medical history, disease characteristics, and myelotoxicity of the chemotherapy regimen. Dose-dense regimens that require CSFs should only be used within an appropriately designed clinical trial or if supported by convincing efficacy data. Current recommendations for the management of patients exposed to lethal doses of total-body radiotherapy, but not doses high enough to lead to certain death as a result of injury to other organs, include the prompt administration of CSFs.
Topics: Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia; Filgrastim; Hematologic Agents; Humans; Leukocytes; Medical Oncology; Patient Selection; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26169616
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3488 -
BMC Cancer Aug 2023Currently, there is no standard treatment for managing relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS) after allogeneic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and safety of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents for relapse of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Currently, there is no standard treatment for managing relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Venetoclax-based therapies have been increasingly used for treating post-transplantation relapse of AML. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of Venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) for AML/MDS relapse post-transplantation.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane Library, and Clinical. gov for eligible studies from the inception to February 2022. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies was used to evaluate the quality of the included literatures. The inverse variance method calculated the pooled proportion and 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 10 studies involving a total of 243 patients. The pooled complete response and complete response with incomplete blood count recovery rate of Venetoclax combined with HMAs for post-transplantation relapse in AML/MDS was 32% (95% CI, 26-39%, I = 0%), with an overall response rate of 48% (95% CI, 39-56%, I = 37%). The 6-month survival rate was 42% (95% CI, 29-55%, I = 62%) and the 1-year survival rate was 23% (95% CI, 11-38%, I = 78%).
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrated a moderate benefit of Venetoclax in combination with HMAs for patients with relapsed AML/MDS post-transplantation (including those who have received prior HMAs therapy), and may become one of treatment options in the future. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm the potential benefit from venetoclax combined with HMAs.
Topics: Humans; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Chronic Disease; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Neoplasms, Second Primary
PubMed: 37592239
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11259-6 -
BMC Hematology 20185-Azacitidine administered as a 7-day dosing regimen (7-0-0) is approved in high risk IPSS myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. Alternative regimens such as a 5-day...
BACKGROUND
5-Azacitidine administered as a 7-day dosing regimen (7-0-0) is approved in high risk IPSS myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. Alternative regimens such as a 5-day (5-0-0) or 7-day with a weekend break (5-2-2) are commonly used. No randomized controlled trial has been done directly comparing all three dosing regimens. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacies of the 5-0-0, 5-2-2, and 7-0-0 regimens in MDS and AML.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational prospective and retrospective studies. The primary clinical outcomes were Objective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the sum of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and hematological improvement (HI) as defined by the IWG 2006 criteria. A meta-analysis of simple proportions was conducted using a random effects model with weights defined according to Laird and Mosteller. Comparisons between groups were not attempted due to the heterogeneity of study designs.
RESULTS
The only RCT directly comparing alternative azacitidine regimens showed no difference in ORR between the 5-0-0 and 5-2-2 regimens. All other RCTs compared a dosing regimen to conventional care. The pooled proportion of ORR was 44.8% with 95% CI (42.8%, 45.5%) for 7-0-0, 41.2% with 95% CI (39.2%, 41.9%) for 5-0-0, and 45.8% with 95% CI (42.6%, 46.4%) for 5-2-2.
CONCLUSIONS
Indirect comparison of alternative azacitidine dosing regimens in MDS and AML shows a benefit for the 7-day regimen in attaining ORR. Additional RCTs are required to definitively address this comparison.
PubMed: 29435331
DOI: 10.1186/s12878-017-0094-8 -
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Feb 2020Iron overload remains a concern in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients especially those requiring recurrent blood transfusions. Whether iron chelating therapy (ICT)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Iron overload remains a concern in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients especially those requiring recurrent blood transfusions. Whether iron chelating therapy (ICT) is beneficial to the long-term survival of myelodysplastic syndrome is still a controversial issue. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the relationship between ICT and long-term survival in patients with MDS. A total of 14 studies involving 7242 participants were identified; the outcomes revealed that for patients with MDS, ICT resulted in a lower risk of mortality compared to those with no ICT (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44-0.70; P < 0.001); what is more, ICT led to a lower risk of leukemia transformation (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52-0.93; P = 0.016). Results of subgroup analyses based on adequate ICT or any ICT, low/int-1 IPSS or unclassified IPSS and study types indicated that the ICT had a beneficial role in all these groups of patients.
Topics: Chelation Therapy; Humans; Iron; Iron Overload; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31712933
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-019-00592-5 -
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Oct 2023Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are hematologic malignancies that mostly affect the elderly and have poor prognoses. Mutations in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy of epigenetic agents for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are hematologic malignancies that mostly affect the elderly and have poor prognoses. Mutations in epigenetic regulatory genes cause AML/MDS through changes in DNA methylation and histone modifications. Some epigenetic agents are used in patients with AML and MDS. However, most studies have focused on azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DEC), and few studies have been conducted on combination therapies or other epigenetic therapies. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy of epigenetic agents overall in patients with AML and MDS. A systematic review and NMA of all available II-III phase randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing epigenetic agents were performed. The Embase and PubMed databases were searched for relevant studies. The Bayesian model was used in the NMA, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank comparisons. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). OS was extended by AZA + venetoclax (SUCRA 0.94) in patients with AML and MDS. DEC (SUCRA 0.78) relatively improved CR and PR. In this study, AZA-related treatment was relatively effective in improving the OS of patients with AML and MDS, and DEC-related treatment showed a relatively high effect on CR and PR. The protocol for this systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022303601).
Topics: Aged; Humans; Azacitidine; Epigenesis, Genetic; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36964818
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-023-01041-0 -
Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Dec 2023Arsenic trioxide (ATO) might be effective for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) by apoptosis induction and demethylation. But ATO has not been widely recommended for small... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Arsenic trioxide (ATO) might be effective for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) by apoptosis induction and demethylation. But ATO has not been widely recommended for small sample and conflicting conclusion of existing trials. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of regimens containing ATO for the MDS and explore optimal combination.
METHOD
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) about ATO regimens were retrieved from China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Embase and PubMed. With odds ratio (OR) as the effect size, network meta-analysis (NMA) and component network meta-analysis (CNMA) were conducted by R and 'netmeta' package, after study selection, quality assessment and data extraction.
RESULT
Thirty-night RCTs were included with a total of 2125 patients, including 1235 treated by ATO containing regimen. With support therapy alone as reference, no inconsistency and heterogeneity were observed. Although NMA did not demonstrate better efficacy of ATO alone, the result of CNMA indicated that ATO was effective in the improvement of overall remission (ORR) [OR = 2.09(1.61, 2.71)] and complete remission (CR) [OR = 1.66(1.25, 2.21)]. Five ATO-containing regimens reported could effectively improve ORR, some of them benefit in CR or hematological improvement (HI) as well. ATO + Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), ATO + Thalidomide (T)+TCM, ATO + Chemotherapy (Chem)+T + TCM were regarded as the optimal combination, which improved both ORR, CR and HI in theory. ATO did not increase the risk of common adverse events compared to supportive therapy [(OR = 0.90(0.67, 1.21)].
CONCLUSION
ATO may be an effective and well-tolerant option for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.
Topics: Humans; Arsenic Trioxide; Network Meta-Analysis; Arsenicals; Oxides; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37908176
DOI: 10.1080/16078454.2023.2274149 -
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &... Sep 2019The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate medical conditions and modifiable risk factors for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) using the 2001 or 2008 World Health...
BACKGROUND
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate medical conditions and modifiable risk factors for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) using the 2001 or 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria.
METHODS
PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between January 2001 and August 2017. Study characteristics and findings were abstracted for each article.
RESULTS
Thirteen articles (4 cohort, 9 case-control) met the inclusion criteria. Smoking and alcohol use were each evaluated as potential MDS risk factors in four studies. Body mass index and anemia were each evaluated in two studies. Other potential risk factors evaluated in single studies included physical activity, dietary intake (tea, isoflavones, meat, fruit, or vegetables), history of allergies, autoimmune disorders and community-acquired infections, and use of antituberculosis drugs, traditional Chinese medicines, or hair dyes.
CONCLUSIONS
Higher BMI, smoking, a history of autoimmune disorders, community-acquired infections, history of anemia, and use of antituberculosis drugs were associated with higher risk of MDS. Vigorous physical activity and tea and dietary isoflavone intake were associated with lower MDS risk. These findings suggest no association between the other factors and risk of MDS.
IMPACT
Research on risk factors for MDS is limited, and further research in larger studies is needed.
Topics: Humans; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Risk Factors
PubMed: 31213463
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0106 -
International Journal of Cancer Apr 2010Glutathione-S-transferace polymorphisms may make hematopoietic lineage cells susceptible to genotoxicity following exposure to heavy metals or benzene. We conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Glutathione-S-transferace polymorphisms may make hematopoietic lineage cells susceptible to genotoxicity following exposure to heavy metals or benzene. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to define the effect of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null polymorphisms on MDS risk. We searched the PubMed and SCOPUS databases to identify peer-reviewed published case-control studies investigating the association between GSTT1 and/or GSTM1 null genotypes and development of MDS. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q statistic and the I(2) statistic. Odds ratios from individual studies were pooled using fixed and random effects models. Thirteen studies were considered eligible for the GSTT1 meta-analysis (1471 cases, 1907 controls) and 10 were considered eligible for the GSTM1 meta-analysis (1161 cases, 1668 controls). For the GSTT1 polymorphism, there was moderate between study heterogeneity (p(Q) = 0.01; I(2) = 52.3%) and the null genotype was significantly associated with increased risk of MDS development, random effects OR = 1.43 (95% CI, 1.09-1.89); p = 0.01. For the GSTM1 polymorphisms there was moderate between-study heterogeneity (p = 0.07; I(2) = 43.1%) and the random effects OR = 1.02 (95% CI, 0.82-1.28) was non-significant (p = 0.85). The GSTT1 null genotype is a significant risk factor for MDS development. Gene-environment interactions need to be further explored.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Follow-Up Studies; Glutathione Transferase; Humans; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Neoplasm Staging; Odds Ratio; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Survival Rate
PubMed: 19816935
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24940