-
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Apr 2024We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) in TP53-mutated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) in TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). A literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov. After screening 626 articles, eight studies were included. Data were extracted following the PRISMA guidelines and analyzed using the meta-package by Schwarzer et al. We analyzed 540 patients. The pooled median 3 (1-5) year overall survival was 21% (95% CI 0.08-0.37, I2=91%, n=540). The pooled relapse rate was 58.9% (95% CI 0.38-0.77, I2=93%, n=487) at a median of 1.75 (1-3) years. The pooled 4-year progression- free survival was 34.8% (95% CI 0.15-0.57, I2=72%, n=105). Outcomes of Allo-HSCT for TP53-mutated MDS patients remain poor, with 21% OS at three years; however, Allo-HSCT confers a survival advantage as compared to non-transplant palliative therapies. Our findings suggest the need to explore novel therapeutic agents in prospective clinical trials.
Topics: Humans; Prospective Studies; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Progression-Free Survival; Transplantation Conditioning; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
PubMed: 38423375
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104310 -
Systematic Reviews Sep 2018Hypomethylating agents (HMA), azacitidine, and decitabine are frequently used in the management of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, there are no clinical trials... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Hypomethylating agents (HMA), azacitidine, and decitabine are frequently used in the management of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, there are no clinical trials that have directly compared these agents. We conducted a systematic review and indirectly compared the efficacy of azacitidine to decitabine in MDS.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) through June 28, 2018, without language or time restrictions. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers, and differences were resolved by consensus. The fixed effect model and adjusted indirect comparison methods were used to pool relative risks (RR) of major outcomes of interest (mortality, response rate, quality of life, hematologic improvement, hospitalization, leukemia transformation, transfusion independence).
RESULTS
Only four trials met the eligibility criteria. Two trials compared azacitidine to the best supportive care (BSC) and included 549 patients, and the other two compared decitabine to BSC and included 403 patients. The risk of bias was unclear overall. Compared to BSC, azacitidine was significantly associated with lower mortality (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.94, I = 89%) whereas decitabine did not significantly reduce mortality (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-1.00, I = 53%). Both drugs were associated with higher partial and complete response compared to BSC. Indirect comparisons were not statistically significant for all the studied outcomes, except for complete response where azacitidine was less likely to induce complete response compared to decitabine (RR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.01-0.86, very low-certainty evidence).
CONCLUSIONS
Azacitidine and decitabine are both associated with improved outcomes compared to BSC. The available indirect evidence comparing the two agents warrants very low certainty and cannot reliably confirm the superiority of either agent. Head-to-head trials are needed. In the meantime, the choice of agent should be driven by patient preferences, adverse effects, drug availability, and cost.
Topics: Humans; Azacitidine; Blood Transfusion; Decitabine; Mortality; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Network Meta-Analysis; Quality of Life
PubMed: 30227896
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0805-7 -
Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Dec 2020To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of venetoclax(VEN) in combination with hypomethylating agents(HMAs) in acute myeloid leukemia(AML) or myelodysplastic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The efficacy and adverse events of venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of venetoclax(VEN) in combination with hypomethylating agents(HMAs) in acute myeloid leukemia(AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome(MDS).
METHODS
Clinical studies were identified from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Overall complete remission (CR) and overall response rate (ORR) were used to evaluate the efficacy of VEN in combination with HMAs for AML/MDS, the incidence of the 4 most common grade 3-4 adverse events was used to evaluate safety.
RESULTS
We identified 13 studies that included a total of 1059 patients. 7 cohort studies and 5 non-randomized controlled trials(NRCTs) were analyzed by random-effects model, and subgroup analyses showed the pooled overall CR rate of 62% (95% CI 57-67%, I = 3%) for the new-diagnosed(ND) AML group, 39% (95% CI 30-48%, I = 28%) for relapsed/refractory(R/R)-AML, and 61% (95% CI 50-71%, I = 25%) for MDS, respectively. There was only one randomized controlled trial(RCT) that showed a CR rate of 66.4% in the patients who received azacitidine(AZA) plus VEN. A total of 8 studies reported adverse events, with cytopenia and infection being the most common grade 3-4 adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
The addition of VEN to HMAs may provide significant clinical benefit for AML/MDS patients, where response rates are better in MDS and ND-AML than in R/R-AML, but attention should be paid to the possible increased risk of febrile neutropenia.
Topics: Azacitidine; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Female; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Male; Models, Biological; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 33191860
DOI: 10.1080/16078454.2020.1843752 -
Cell Transplantation 2020The use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is recommended during the first complete remission of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparative Efficacy and Clinical Outcomes of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation to Other Stem Sources for Treatment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
The use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is recommended during the first complete remission of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, only 30% of these cases have fully matched sibling donors (MSDs). Alternatively, matched unrelated donors (MUDs) and haploidentical (haplo) donors from first-degree relatives increase the access to transplantation, with some reported differences in outcomes. The current systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim of summarizing the results of those studies to compare the efficacy and toxicity of MSD-HSCT and MUD-HSCT versus haplo-HSCT for patients with AML or MDS. Articles published before September 15, 2018, were individually searched for in two databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) by two investigators. The effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each eligible study were combined using the Mantel-Haenszel method. A total of 14 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The overall survival rates were not significantly different between the groups, with pooled odds ratios of the chance of surviving at the end of the study when comparing haplo-HSCT to MSD-HSCT and comparing haplo-HSCT to MUD-HSCT of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.70 to 1.04; = 0%) and 1.12 (95% CI: 0.89 to 1.41; = 33%), respectively. The pooled analyses of other outcomes also showed comparable results, except for the higher grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) for patients who received haplo-HSCT than those who received MSD-HSCT, and the better GvHD-free, relapse-free survival and the lower chronic GvHD than the patients in the MUD-HSCT group. These observations suggest that haplo-HSCT is a reasonable alternative with comparable efficacy if MSD-HSCT and MUD-HSCT cannot be performed. Nonetheless, the primary studies included in this meta-analysis were observational in nature, and randomized-controlled trials are still needed to confirm the efficacy of haplo-HSCT.
Topics: Confidence Intervals; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Survival Rate
PubMed: 32323567
DOI: 10.1177/0963689720904965 -
Clinical Epigenetics 2016Aberrant DNA methylation has been identified as a key molecular event regulating the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS); myeloid neoplasms with an inherent... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
BACKGROUND
Aberrant DNA methylation has been identified as a key molecular event regulating the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS); myeloid neoplasms with an inherent risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Based on the above findings, DNA hypomethylating agents (HMA) have been widely used to treat AML and MDS, especially in elderly patients and in those who are not eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Our goal was to determine if there is any therapeutic advantage of HMA vs. conventional care regimens (CCR) and indirectly compare the efficacy of azacitidine and decitabine in this patient population.
METHODS
Eligible studies were limited to randomized controlled trials comparing HMA to CCR in adult patients with AML or MDS.
RESULTS
Overall survival (OS) rate was 33.2 vs. 21.4 % (RR 0.83, 95 % CI 0.71-0.98) and overall response rate (ORR) 23.7 vs. 13.4 % (RR 0.87, 95 % CI 0.81-0.93) for HMA and CCR, respectively. In subgroup analyses, only azacitidine treatment showed OS improvement (RR 0.75, 95 % CI 0.64-0.98) and not decitabine. Cytogenetic risk or bone marrow blast count did not have independent prognostic impact.
CONCLUSION
Collectively, these results demonstrate that HMA have superior outcomes compared to CCR and suggest that azacitidine in comparison to decitabine, may be more effective.
Topics: Aged; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Azacitidine; DNA Methylation; Decitabine; Epigenesis, Genetic; Female; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Male; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27307795
DOI: 10.1186/s13148-016-0233-2 -
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Aug 2020Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are now a major treatment option for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and related neoplasms, but 50% of patients still do not respond and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Role Of TP53 mutations in predicting the clinical efficacy of hypomethylating therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and related neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are now a major treatment option for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and related neoplasms, but 50% of patients still do not respond and realize poor outcomes. Mutational predictors of treatment efficacy attract continuous attention. Whether TP53 mutations can be used as predictors of HMA effectiveness has caused heated debate. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the predictive value of TP53 mutations to outcomes of HMA therapy in patients with MDS and related neoplasms. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the WanFang databases (published deadline: September 12, 2019). The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled to estimate the association between TP53 mutations and the clinical efficacy of HMAs. Four hundred fifteen papers were found, and 22 papers were included in this meta-analysis (N = 2020 participants). The results showed that the presence of TP53 mutation predicted an increased overall response rate with HMA treatment in the subsets that restricted patients in de novo disease, MDS by WHO (World Health Organization) criteria, or NGS (next-generation sequence) group (P = 0.005, P = 0.003, P = 0.0005, respectively). However, TP53 mutations remained poor factors for OS (P < 0.00001). Collectively, in HMA therapy, TP53 mutations can predict better ORR when setting more refined subgroups, but TP53 mutations still strongly correlated with poor survival in hypomethylating therapy.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; DNA Methylation; Humans; Mutation; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Neoplasms; Odds Ratio; Prognosis; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
PubMed: 32613269
DOI: 10.1007/s10238-020-00641-4 -
British Journal of Haematology Apr 2022
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Chelation Therapy; Humans; Iron; Iron Chelating Agents; Iron Overload; Myelodysplastic Syndromes
PubMed: 34927248
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17998 -
Blood Reviews Sep 2023Anemia is common in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS). Different anemia treatments have been tested in clinical studies, but the full impact on patients' health-related... (Review)
Review
Anemia is common in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS). Different anemia treatments have been tested in clinical studies, but the full impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and physical function is unknown. The main aim of this review was to assess whether improvements in anemia are associated with changes in HRQoL/physical function. Twenty-six full-text publications were identified, enrolling 2211 patients: nine randomized trials (RCTs), fourteen non-randomized studies of interventions and three cross-sectional studies. Interventions included: growth factors/erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (n = 14), red cell transfusion (n = 9), erythroid maturation agents (n = 1), or a combination (n = 2). Five RCTs reported no changes in HRQoL despite erythroid response to the intervention, raising the question of whether anemia treatment alone can effectively improve HRQoL. Many studies were considered at high risk of bias for assessing HRQoL. There is a pressing need for future clinical trials to better define the nature of the relationship between anemia and HRQoL/functional outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Anemia; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Hematinics; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Quality of Life
PubMed: 37479599
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101114 -
Leukemia Research Aug 2018To compare the efficacy and safety between hypomethylating agent (HMA) alone and the combination of HMA and histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) in myelodysplastic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Addition of histone deacetylase inhibitors does not improve prognosis in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia compared with hypomethylating agents alone: A systematic review and meta-analysis of seven prospective cohort studies.
AIM
To compare the efficacy and safety between hypomethylating agent (HMA) alone and the combination of HMA and histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available cohort studies regarding the comparison of HMA alone and in combination with HDACi for MDS and AML. Embase and Pubmed databases were searched for relevant studies. The overall hazard ratios for the HMA alone and HDACi combination were extracted. Heterogeneity among the included studies was evaluated by Cochrane's Q Test and I statistics. A random-effect model or a fixed-effect model was applied depending on the heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was used to evaluate the source of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Seven studies comprising 922 patients (458 patients treated with HMA alone and 464 with HMA and HDACi) were included in the analysis. Pooled data showed no significant differences in complete remission (CR) rates, hematologic improvement (HI), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicities between HMA alone treatment and HMA with HDACi regimens.
CONCLUSIONS
HDACi and HMA combination does not appear to be more effective and better tolerated than HMA alone. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm its efficacy and safety.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Cohort Studies; Decitabine; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29936305
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2018.06.007 -
Skin Health and Disease Apr 2024Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) may present with specific skin lesions, such as leukaemia cutis, which is a well known poor prognostic marker of leukaemia with a high...
Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) may present with specific skin lesions, such as leukaemia cutis, which is a well known poor prognostic marker of leukaemia with a high risk of acute leukaemic transformation. However, less is known regarding non-specific cutaneous manifestations of MDS including the prevalence, types and their prognostic and therapeutic significance, which we aimed to determine through this systematic review. We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Medline and EMBASE) from inception up to 26 January 2023 for studies reporting cutaneous manifestations of MDS. Eighty eight articles (case reports = 67, case series = 21), consisting of 134 patients were identified. We identified 6 common cutaneous manifestations: neutrophilic dermatoses ( = 64), vasculitis ( = 21), granulomatous ( = 8), connective tissue disease (CTD) ( = 7; composed of dermatomyositis ( = 5), cutaneous lupus erythematosus ( = 1), and systemic sclerosis ( = 1)), panniculitis ( = 4), immunobullous ( = 1), and other ( = 29). Cutaneous features either occurred at time of MDS diagnosis in 25.3%, preceding the diagnosis in 34.7% (range 0.5-216 months), or after diagnosis in 40.0% (range 1-132 months). Prognosis was poor (40.2% death) with 34.1% progressing to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). 50% of those with MDS who progressed to AML had neutrophilic dermatoses ( = 0.21). Myelodysplastic syndrome was fatal in 39.2% of neutrophilic dermatoses (median time from onset of cutaneous manifestation: 12 months), 50% of vasculitis (7.5 months), 62.5% of granulomatous (15.5 months) and 14.3% of CTD (7 months). Recognition of patterns of cutaneous features in MDS will improve early diagnosis and risk stratification according to subtype and associated prognosis.
PubMed: 38577044
DOI: 10.1002/ski2.323