-
The Spine Journal : Official Journal of... Jun 2013Disc herniation is a common low back pain (LBP) disorder, and several clinical test procedures are routinely employed in its diagnosis. The neurological examination that... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
Disc herniation is a common low back pain (LBP) disorder, and several clinical test procedures are routinely employed in its diagnosis. The neurological examination that assesses sensory neuron and motor responses has historically played a role in the differential diagnosis of disc herniation, particularly when radiculopathy is suspected; however, the diagnostic ability of this examination has not been explicitly investigated.
PURPOSE
To review the scientific literature to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the neurological examination to detect lumbar disc herniation with suspected radiculopathy.
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.
METHODS
Six major electronic databases were searched with no date or language restrictions for relevant articles up until March 2011. All diagnostic studies investigating neurological impairments in LBP patients because of lumbar disc herniation were assessed for possible inclusion. Retrieved studies were individually evaluated and assessed for quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, and where appropriate, a meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS
A total of 14 studies that investigated three standard neurological examination components, sensory, motor, and reflexes, met the study criteria and were included. Eight distinct meta-analyses were performed that compared the findings of the neurological examination with the reference standard results from surgery, radiology (magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and myelography), and radiological findings at specific lumbar levels of disc herniation. Pooled data for sensory testing demonstrated low diagnostic sensitivity for surgically (0.40) and radiologically (0.32) confirmed disc herniation, and identification of a specific level of disc herniation (0.35), with moderate specificity achieved for all the three reference standards (0.59, 0.72, and 0.64, respectively). Motor testing for paresis demonstrated similarly low pooled diagnostic sensitivities (0.22 and 0.40) and moderate specificity values (0.79 and 0.62) for surgically and radiologically determined disc herniation, whereas motor testing for muscle atrophy resulted in a pooled sensitivity of 0.31 and the specificity was 0.76 for surgically determined disc herniation. For reflex testing, the pooled sensitivities for surgically and radiologically confirmed levels of disc herniation were 0.29 and 0.25, whereas the specificity values were 0.78 and 0.75, respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratios for all neurological examination components ranged between 1.02 and 1.26.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that neurological testing procedures have limited overall diagnostic accuracy in detecting disc herniation with suspected radiculopathy. Pooled diagnostic accuracy values of the tests were poor, whereby all tests demonstrated low sensitivity, moderate specificity, and limited diagnostic accuracy independent of the disc herniation reference standard or the specific level of herniation. The lack of a standardized classification criterion for disc herniation, the variable psychometric properties of the testing procedures, and the complex pathoetiology of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy are suggested as possible reasons for these findings.
Topics: Humans; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Low Back Pain; Lumbar Vertebrae; Neurologic Examination; Peripheral Nervous System; Radiculopathy
PubMed: 23499340
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.007 -
JBJS Reviews Oct 2019Neuropathic arthropathy of the shoulder is a chronic progressive process characterized by joint destruction in the presence of a neurosensory deficit. Causes include...
BACKGROUND
Neuropathic arthropathy of the shoulder is a chronic progressive process characterized by joint destruction in the presence of a neurosensory deficit. Causes include syringomyelia, syphilis, diabetes, chronic alcoholism, and leprosy, with syringomyelia accounting for the vast majority of upper-extremity Charcot joints. Early presentation of this rare condition includes nonspecific symptoms such as swelling, erythema, sensory symptoms, and decreased functionality, making diagnosis challenging.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed 32 case reports published between 1924 and 2016. A total of 59 shoulders from 56 patients are included in this analysis. Variables include patient demographic characteristics, presentation, etiology, diagnostic techniques, treatment, outcome, and follow-up of Charcot shoulder.
RESULTS
We compiled a total of 25 right shoulders (42%), 24 left shoulders (41%), and 10 shoulders (17%) with unspecified laterality. The mean patient age (and standard deviation) was 49 ± 11 years, and the median age was 47 years. There was a higher prevalence in men (37 shoulders [63%]) compared with women (22 shoulders [37%]). Presenting symptoms included reduced range of motion (53 shoulders [90%]), paresthesia or hypoesthesia (45 [76%]), swelling (44 [75%]), weakness (40 [68%]), pain (31 [53%]), and reduction in deep tendon reflexes (22 [37%]). Shoulder radiographs were made in all cases. The presence of a syrinx was detected in 45 shoulders (76%) with magnetic resonance imaging, myelography, or clinical diagnosis. Sixteen shoulders (27%) reported exposure to trauma, with a 69% decrease in time from presentation to diagnosis compared with non-traumatic cases. Treatment was categorized as solely nonoperative management (14 [24%]), operative management (13 [22%]), combined therapy (20 [34%]), and no treatment listed (10 [17%]). Two surgical cases (3%) were excluded from our treatment group analysis as they were treated for unrelated or misdiagnosed conditions.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study increases awareness and understanding of this complex, progressive disease to reduce delay and misdiagnosis and to contribute to the standard-of-care recommendations.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Topics: Arthropathy, Neurogenic; Humans; Shoulder Joint
PubMed: 31663919
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00155 -
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association... Nov 2001Headache after cervical or lumbar puncture has long been attributed to early mobilization; however, there is little evidence for this. We performed a systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Headache after cervical or lumbar puncture has long been attributed to early mobilization; however, there is little evidence for this. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess whether longer bed rest is better than immediate mobilization or short bed rest in preventing headache.
METHODS
We searched EMBASE (1988 to March 2001), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2001), Pascal Biomed (1996 to February 2001), Current Contents (1997 to September 1999), PsycINFO (1966 to May 2001), the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (last search May 15, 2001), textbooks and references of the papers selected. Studies were eligible if patients underwent cervical or lumbar puncture for any reason and were randomly assigned to either a long or a short period of bed rest. Data were abstracted independently by 2 investigators to a predefined form.
RESULTS
We found 16 randomized controlled trials involving 1083 patients assigned to immediate mobilization or a short period of bed rest (up to 8 hours) and 1128 patients assigned to a longer period of bed rest (0.5 to 24 hours). Puncture was performed for anesthesia (5 trials), myelography (6 trials) and diagnostic reasons (5 trials). None of the trials showed that longer bed rest was superior to immediate mobilization or short bed rest for preventing headache after puncture. When pooling the results of the trials in the myelography group and the diagnostic group, the relative risks of headache after puncture were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-1.08) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.79-1.19) respectively. We did not pool the results from the trials in the anesthesia group because of clinical heterogeneity, but shorter bed rest appeared to be superior.
INTERPRETATION
There was no evidence that longer bed rest after cervical or lumbar puncture was better than immediate mobilization or short bed rest in reducing the incidence of headache.
Topics: Bed Rest; Cervical Vertebrae; Headache; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spinal Puncture; Time Factors
PubMed: 11760976
DOI: No ID Found -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Jul 2022Perinatal brachial plexus palsy (PBPP) has a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms that can range from incomplete paresis of the affected extremity to flaccid arm... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Perinatal brachial plexus palsy (PBPP) has a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms that can range from incomplete paresis of the affected extremity to flaccid arm paralysis. Although there is a high rate of spontaneous recovery within the first two years of life, it remains challenging to determine which patients will benefit most from surgical intervention. The diagnostic and predictive use of various imaging modalities has been described in the literature, but there is little consensus on approach or algorithm. The anatomic, pathophysiological, and neurodevelopmental characteristics of the neonatal and infant patient population affected by PBPP necessitate thoughtful consideration prior to selecting an imaging modality.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted using six databases. Two reviewers independently screened articles published through October 2021.
RESULTS
Literature search produced 10,329 publications, and 22 articles were included in the final analysis. These studies included 479 patients. Mean age at time of imaging ranged from 2.1 to 12.8 months and investigated imaging modalities included MRI (18 studies), ultrasound (4 studies), CT myelography (4 studies), and X-ray myelography (1 study). Imaging outcomes were compared against surgical findings (16 studies) or clinical examination (6 studies), and 87.5% of patients underwent surgery.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review addresses the relative strengths and challenges of common radiologic imaging options. MRI is the most sensitive and specific for identifying preganglionic nerve injuries such as pseudomeningoceles and rootlet avulsion, the latter of which has the poorest prognosis in this patient population and often dictates the need for surgical intervention.
Topics: Brachial Plexus; Brachial Plexus Neuropathies; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Myelography; Paralysis; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 35536348
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-022-05538-z -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2013The identification of serious pathologies, such as spinal malignancy, is one of the primary purposes of the clinical assessment of patients with low-back pain (LBP).... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The identification of serious pathologies, such as spinal malignancy, is one of the primary purposes of the clinical assessment of patients with low-back pain (LBP). Clinical guidelines recommend awareness of "red flag" features from the patient's clinical history and physical examination to achieve this. However, there are limited empirical data on the diagnostic accuracy of these features and there remains very little information on how best to use them in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the diagnostic performance of clinical characteristics identified by taking a clinical history and conducting a physical examination ("red flags") to screen for spinal malignancy in patients presenting with LBP.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched electronic databases for primary studies (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL) and systematic reviews (PubMed and Medion) from the earliest date until 1 April 2012. Forward and backward citation searching of eligible articles was also performed.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We considered studies if they compared the results of history taking and physical examination on patients with LBP with those of diagnostic imaging (magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, myelography).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed the quality of each included study with the QUality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool and extracted details on patient characteristics, study design, index tests, and reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy data were presented as sensitivities and specificities with 95% confidence intervals for all index tests.
MAIN RESULTS
We included eight cohort studies of which six were performed in primary care (total number of patients; n = 6622), one study was from an accident and emergency setting (n = 482), and one study was from a secondary care setting (n = 257). In the six primary care studies, the prevalence of spinal malignancy ranged from 0% to 0.66%. Overall, data from 20 index tests were extracted and presented, however only seven of these were evaluated by more than one study. Because of the limited number of studies and clinical heterogeneity, statistical pooling of diagnostic accuracy data was not performed.There was some evidence from individual studies that having a previous history of cancer meaningfully increases the probability of malignancy. Most "red flags" such as insidious onset, age > 50, and failure to improve after one month have high false positive rates.All of the tests were evaluated in isolation and no study presented data on a combination of positive tests to identify spinal malignancy.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
For most "red flags," there is insufficient evidence to provide recommendations regarding their diagnostic accuracy or usefulness for detecting spinal malignancy. The available evidence indicates that in patients with LBP, an indication of spinal malignancy should not be based on the results of one single "red flag" question. Further research to evaluate the performance of different combinations of tests is recommended.
Topics: Cohort Studies; Confidence Intervals; Humans; Low Back Pain; Medical History Taking; Middle Aged; Physical Examination; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spinal Neoplasms
PubMed: 23450586
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008686.pub2 -
British Journal of Neurosurgery Apr 2023Non-communicating extradural spinal arachnoid cysts (NEACs) are extremely rare aetiology of symptomatic spinal cord compression. The aim of this study was to address...
OBJECTIVE
Non-communicating extradural spinal arachnoid cysts (NEACs) are extremely rare aetiology of symptomatic spinal cord compression. The aim of this study was to address their pathogenesis, optimum management strategy and outcome through systematic review of existing published studies.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
We have found 13 eligible publications by searching through PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases, published from inception to December 2020. We have analysed the data of 21 patients extracted from those 13 publications by IBM SPSS version 23.
RESULTS
According to our analysis congenital predisposition, trauma, and previous surgery history are the aetiology of NEAC. Clinical presentation of cyst depends upon the location and extent of compression or involvement of the neurovascular structures. Paraparesis with variable degree of sensory disturbance was seen among patients. Based on neuroimaging findings, NEACs are most commonly found at dorsal and dorsolumbar region. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the diagnostic modalities of choice and CT myelography can demonstrate the communication with the subarachnoid space. Recurrence rate of cyst after surgery is very low as only one out of twenty patients showed recurrence. If dural defect is not accurately addressed, the recurrence rate increased significantly.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study has highlighted aetiology, treatment strategies, and neurological outcome of NEAC. These findings may help neurosurgeons to manage this rare surgical entity for favourable outcome.
Topics: Humans; Arachnoid Cysts; Spinal Cord Diseases; Spinal Cord Compression; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 35766304
DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2022.2090505 -
Pain Physician Mar 2021Interventional spine procedures, such as discography, epidural steroid injections (ESIs), facet joint procedures, and intradiscal therapies, are commonly used to treat... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Interventional spine procedures, such as discography, epidural steroid injections (ESIs), facet joint procedures, and intradiscal therapies, are commonly used to treat pain and improve function in patients with spine conditions. Although infections are known to occur following these procedures, there is a lack of comprehensive studies on this topic in recent years.
OBJECTIVES
To assess and characterize infections following interventional spine procedures.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
METHODS
Studies that were published from January 2010 to January 2020 and provided information on infections or infection rates following discography, ESIs, facet joint procedures, and intradiscal therapies were included. PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Infection data were extracted from included studies, and infection rates were calculated for each procedure type. Case reports and infection-only articles were not included in infection rate calculations.
RESULTS
Seventy-two studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. The overall incidence of infection across all studies was 0.12% (231/200,588). The majority of studies (n = 51) were linked to ESIs. Infections related to ESIs were more common than those related to discography or facet joint procedures (0.13% [219/174,431] vs. 0% [0/269] or 0.04% [9/25,697], respectively). Intradiscal therapies had the highest calculated rate of infections (1.05%; 2/191). Quality assessments of the included studies ranged widely.
LIMITATIONS
There was an abundance of case reports in comparison to other study designs; to minimize skewing of the analysis, case reports and infection-only articles were not included in the infection rate. Studies that reported combined infection data for multiple procedures could not be included. Many cohort studies and case series were of lower quality because of their retrospective nature. Additionally, the true incidence of infections related to these procedures is unknown because the majority of these infections often go unreported, and information on regions of the spine and procedure details are often lacking.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on our systematic review, the risk of infections following interventional spine procedures appears to be low overall. More studies focusing on infectious complications with larger sample sizes are needed, particularly for intradiscal therapies, in which the microbiome may be an underlying cause of disc infection. To achieve a true incidence of the risk of infections with these procedures, large prospective registries that collect complication rates are necessary.
Topics: Humans; Myelography; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Diseases; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 33740341
DOI: No ID Found -
Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Metastases from Non-neurogenic Primary Tumors: A Systematic Review.Anticancer Research Jul 2022Intradural extramedullary spinal metastases (IESMs) may severely affect quality-of-life of oncological patients. Several treatments are available but their impact on... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND/AIM
Intradural extramedullary spinal metastases (IESMs) may severely affect quality-of-life of oncological patients. Several treatments are available but their impact on prognosis is unclear. We systematically reviewed the literature on IESMs of non-neurogenic origin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, and Web-of-Science were screened to include articles reporting patients with IESMs from non-neurogenic primary tumors. Clinico-radiological presentation, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS
We included 51 articles encompassing 130 patients of a median age of 62 years (range=32-91 years). The most common primary neoplasms were pulmonary (26.2%), renal (20%), and breast (13.8%) carcinomas. Median time interval from primary tumor to IESMs was 18 months (range=0-240 months). The most common symptoms were sensory (58.3%) and motor (54.2%) deficits. Acute cauda equina syndrome was reported in 29 patients (37.7%). Lesions were diagnosed at magnetic resonance imaging (93.3%), myelography (25%), or computed tomography (16.7%). All patients underwent decompressive laminectomy with tumor resection, partial (54.6%) more frequently than complete (43.1%). Adjuvant radiation (67.5%) and/or systemic (13.3%) therapies were administered. After treatment, most patients had symptom improvement (70.8%) and optimal radiological response (64.2%). Four patients experienced IESMs recurrences (3.1%) with median local tumor control of 14.5 months (range=0.1-36 months). Deaths occurred in 50% of patients, with median overall survival of 6.7 months (range=0.1-108 months).
CONCLUSION
Patients with IESMs have significant tumor burden with poor prognoses. Resection and locoregional radiation may offer favorable clinico-radiological responses but are limited in achieving optimal local control and survival.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Middle Aged; Radiography; Spinal Cord Neoplasms; Spinal Neoplasms; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 35790288
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15814 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2017Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most common complications of diagnostic and therapeutic lumbar punctures. PDPH is defined as any headache occurring... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most common complications of diagnostic and therapeutic lumbar punctures. PDPH is defined as any headache occurring after a lumbar puncture that worsens within 15 minutes of sitting or standing and is relieved within 15 minutes of the patient lying down. Researchers have suggested many types of interventions to help prevent PDPH. It has been suggested that aspects such as needle tip and gauge can be modified to decrease the incidence of PDPH.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of needle tip design (traumatic versus atraumatic) and diameter (gauge) on the prevention of PDPH in participants who have undergone dural puncture for diagnostic or therapeutic causes.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and LILACS, as well as trial registries via the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) search portal in September 2016. We adopted the MEDLINE strategy for searching the other databases. The search terms we used were a combination of thesaurus-based and free-text terms for both interventions (lumbar puncture in neurological, anaesthesia or myelography settings) and headache.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in any clinical/research setting where dural puncture had been used in participants of all ages and both genders, which compared different tip designs or diameters for prevention of PDPH DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 70 studies in the review; 66 studies with 17,067 participants were included in the quantitative analysis. An additional 18 studies are awaiting classification and 12 are ongoing. Fifteen of the 18 studies awaiting classification mainly correspond to congress summaries published before 2010, in which the available information does not allow the complete evaluation of all their risks of bias and characteristics. Our main outcome was prevention of PDPH, but we also assessed the onset of severe PDPH, headache in general and adverse events. The quality of evidence was moderate for most of the outcomes mainly due to risk of bias issues. For the analysis, we undertook three main comparisons: 1) traumatic needles versus atraumatic needles; 2) larger gauge traumatic needles versus smaller gauge traumatic needles; and 3) larger gauge atraumatic needles versus smaller gauge atraumatic needles. For each main comparison, if data were available, we performed a subgroup analysis evaluating lumbar puncture indication, age and posture.For the first comparison, the use of traumatic needles showed a higher risk of onset of PDPH compared to atraumatic needles (36 studies, 9378 participants, risk ratio (RR) 2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72 to 2.67, I = 9%).In the second comparison of traumatic needles, studies comparing various sizes of large and small gauges showed no significant difference in effects in terms of risk of PDPH, with the exception of one study comparing 26 and 27 gauge needles (one study, 658 participants, RR 6.47, 95% CI 2.55 to 16.43).In the third comparison of atraumatic needles, studies comparing various sizes of large and small gauges showed no significant difference in effects in terms of risk of PDPH.We observed no significant difference in the risk of paraesthesia, backache, severe PDPH and any headache between traumatic and atraumatic needles. Sensitivity analyses of PDPH results between traumatic and atraumatic needles omitting high risk of bias studies showed similar results regarding the benefit of atraumatic needles in the prevention of PDPH (three studies, RR 2.78, 95% CI 1.26 to 6.15; I = 51%).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is moderate-quality evidence that atraumatic needles reduce the risk of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) without increasing adverse events such as paraesthesia or backache. The studies did not report very clearly on aspects related to randomization, such as random sequence generation and allocation concealment, making it difficult to interpret the risk of bias in the included studies. The moderate quality of the evidence for traumatic versus atraumatic needles suggests that further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Topics: Back Pain; Equipment Design; Headache; Humans; Needles; Paresthesia; Post-Dural Puncture Headache; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spinal Puncture
PubMed: 28388808
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010807.pub2 -
European Spine Journal : Official... May 2013In this article, we review the English literature of calcified pseudomeningoceles in the lumbar region. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
In this article, we review the English literature of calcified pseudomeningoceles in the lumbar region.
METHODS
A systematic review using the Medline Database using the varied nomenclature for pseudomeningoceles, as well as reviewing the reference lists of relevant article found.
RESULTS
We discuss the different pathological theories on formation of a pseudomeningocele, the formation of a calcified wall and the optimal management for this entity. To date, 17 cases have been described, of which 13 are reviewed here. Calcification of pseudomeningocele is a rare entity and in the lumbar spine this occurs postsurgically. The only predisposing factor is prior surgery to the lumbar spine. Computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI myelography in combination are the preoperative investigations of choice. The radiological work-up can be preoperatively diagnostic and is important in the surgical planning.
CONCLUSIONS
The treatment is surgicel removal and the decision to treat is based on patient symptoms and correlating these with imaging. There is an average reported follow-up of 1.7 years postoperatively for these patients and the reported outcome after surgery is good.
Topics: Calcinosis; Female; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae; Meningocele; Middle Aged; Orthopedic Procedures
PubMed: 23233216
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2610-7