-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2021Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME).... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, there are no current systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2015, and last updated in 2019.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in the treatment of JME.
SEARCH METHODS
For the latest update, we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) on 26 August 2021, and MEDLINE (Ovid 1946 to 26 August 2021). CRS Web includes randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Specialized Registers of Cochrane Review Groups, including Cochrane Epilepsy.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating topiramate versus placebo or other AED treatment for people with JME, with the outcomes of proportion of responders and proportion of participants experiencing adverse events (AEs).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality of the studies.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three studies with a total of 83 participants. For efficacy, a greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or greater reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS), compared with participants in the placebo group (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.08 to 14.75; 1 study, 22 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There were no significant differences between topiramate and valproate for participants responding with a 50% or greater reduction in myoclonic seizures (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.15; one study, 23 participants; very-low certainty evidence) or in PGTCS (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.21; one study, 16 participants, very-low certainty evidence), or participants becoming seizure-free (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.11; one study, 27 participants; very-low certainty evidence). Concerning tolerability, we ranked AEs associated with topiramate as moderate to severe, while we ranked 59% of AEs linked to valproate as severe complaints (2 studies, 61 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Moreover, systemic toxicity scores were higher in the valproate group than the topiramate group. Overall we judged all three studies to be at high risk of attrition bias and at unclear risk of reporting bias. We judged the studies to be at low to unclear risk of bias for the remaining domains (selection bias, performance bias, detection bias and other bias). We judged the overall certainty of the evidence for the outcomes as very low using the GRADE approach.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We have found no new studies since the last version of this review was published in 2019. This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support topiramate for the treatment of people with JME. Based on the current limited available data, topiramate seems to be better tolerated than valproate, but has no clear benefits over valproate in terms of efficacy. Well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to test the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Humans; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Topiramate; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 34817852
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010008.pub5 -
Seizure Jun 2024Sleep disturbances significantly impact the lives of individuals with Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy (JME). This study aimed to investigate sleep studies, disturbances, and... (Review)
Review
Sleep disturbances significantly impact the lives of individuals with Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy (JME). This study aimed to investigate sleep studies, disturbances, and the impact of anti-seizure drugs on sleep in JME patients. Relevant studies were retrieved from the National Library of Medicine (Pubmed) database and the Cochrane Library utilizing the search terms "Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy" and "sleep". A total of 160 papers' review, data extraction, and resolution of discrepancies were performed independently by two reviewers according to the PRISMA protocol and were registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023472439). A systematic review of 31 studies was conducted, encompassing various methodologies, including sleep questionnaires (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (n = 13), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (n = 10)), polysomnography (n = 8), EEG (n = 9), actigraphy (n = 1), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (n = 1). Most studies were hospital-based (n = 31), cross-sectional (n = 11), and prospective (n = 25). Patients with JME exhibit a higher prevalence of sleep disturbances, worse quality of sleep (n = 4), daytime sleepiness (n = 2), sleep efficiency (n = 7), and increased sleep latency (n = 1) compared to controls. These disruptions are characterized by increased wakefulness (n = 3), frequent arousals (n = 3), decreased REM sleep (n = 2), and conflicting NREM sleep findings (n = 3). Additional sleep-related issues observed in JME patients include insomnia (n = 1) and increased prevalence of parasomnias such as nightmares and sleep talking. Periodic limb movement and obstructive sleep apnea are similar or less frequent (3/28). REM behavioral disorders and sleepwalking were not seen. Valproate showed conflicting effects on sleep (n = 7), while levetiracetam did not impact sleep (n = 1). These findings underlined the need for more sufficient evidence of sleep studies in JME. Future research should prioritize understanding the nature of sleep in JME and its impact on management.
PubMed: 38908143
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.05.014 -
Epileptic Disorders : International... Feb 2019Rolandic (RE), childhood absence (CAE) and juvenile myoclonic (JME) epilepsy encompass centrotemporal sharp waves, 3-Hz spike waves and >3-Hz spike or polyspike waves,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Rolandic (RE), childhood absence (CAE) and juvenile myoclonic (JME) epilepsy encompass centrotemporal sharp waves, 3-Hz spike waves and >3-Hz spike or polyspike waves, respectively. Evidence abounds for genetic roles in all three syndromes, yet involved genes for the vast majority of patients remain unknown. It has long been proposed that while each disease is genetically complex, its specific EEG trait may represent a genetically simpler endophenotype. This meta-analysis of the literature focuses on the frequency of EEG traits in clinically unaffected first-degree relatives towards determining inheritance patterns of the EEG endophenotypes. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for protocols (PRISMA-P) and searched Medline, EMBASE, CINHAL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Following extensive screening, 15 studies were included with a total of 3,858 asymptomatic relatives. The prevalence of 'abnormal' EEG waves was 21%, 42% and 33% for JME, CAE and RE, respectively, close to what would be expected based on Mendelian inheritance. However, breaking down the reported EEG abnormalities, most consisted not of the respective EEG signature traits -prevalences of which were as low as 5%- but of non-specific EEG 'abnormalities'/variants. Prevalence of non-specific EEG 'abnormalities'/variants in the general population ranges from 0.1 to 10%. Underlying this 100-fold-wide range is a spectrum of what is considered 'abnormal' or variant. The prevalences of 'abnormalities'/variants in asymptomatic siblings in RE, CAE and JME significantly exceed even the highest value in the general population and fall within Mendelian expectations. These results suggest that EEG 'abnormalities'/variants shared with the general population are enriched in the three syndromes and are endophenotypes inherited in a genetically simple near-Mendelian fashion. Future work with modern EEG variant definitions should uncover genetic variants contributing to neuronal hypersynchrony in epilepsy.
Topics: Electroencephalography; Endophenotypes; Epilepsy, Absence; Epilepsy, Rolandic; Humans; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Siblings
PubMed: 30767897
DOI: 10.1684/epd.2019.1024 -
Children (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2023Vitamin B6-dependent epilepsies include treatable diseases responding to pyridoxine or pyridoxal-5Iphosphate (ALDH7A1 deficiency, PNPO deficiency, PLP binding protein... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Vitamin B6-dependent epilepsies include treatable diseases responding to pyridoxine or pyridoxal-5Iphosphate (ALDH7A1 deficiency, PNPO deficiency, PLP binding protein deficiency, hyperprolinemia type II and hypophosphatasia and glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor synthesis defects).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of published pediatric cases with a confirmed molecular genetic diagnosis of vitamin B6-dependent epilepsy according to PRISMA guidelines. Data on demographic features, seizure semiology, EEG patterns, neuroimaging, treatment, and developmental outcomes were collected.
RESULTS
497 published patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Seizure onset manifested at 59.8 ± 291.6 days (67.8% of cases in the first month of life). Clonic, tonic-clonic, and myoclonic seizures accounted for two-thirds of the cases, while epileptic spasms were observed in 7.6%. Burst-suppression/suppression-burst represented the most frequently reported specific EEG pattern (14.4%), mainly in PLPB, ALDH7A1, and PNPO deficiency. Pyridoxine was administered to 312 patients (18.5% intravenously, 76.9% orally, 4.6% not specified), and 180 also received antiseizure medications. Pyridoxine dosage ranged between 1 and 55 mg/kg/die. Complete seizure freedom was achieved in 160 patients, while a significant seizure reduction occurred in 38. PLP, lysine-restricted diet, and arginine supplementation were used in a small proportion of patients with variable efficacy. Global developmental delay was established in 30.5% of a few patients in whom neurocognitive tests were performed.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the wide variability, the most frequent hallmarks of the epilepsy phenotype in patients with vitamin B6-dependent seizures include generalized or focal motor seizure semiology and a burst suppression/suppression burst pattern in EEG.
PubMed: 36980111
DOI: 10.3390/children10030553 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2017Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, there are no current systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in people with JME. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 12, 2015.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of JME.
SEARCH METHODS
For the latest update, on 21 February 2017 we searched Cochrane Epilepsy's Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted study authors and pharmaceutical companies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating topiramate monotherapy versus placebo or other AED treatment for people with JME, with the outcomes of proportion of responders or experiencing adverse events (AEs).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality. We performed no meta-analyses due to the limited available data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three studies with 83 participants. For efficacy, a greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or more reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) compared with participants in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between topiramate versus valproate in participants responding with a 50% or more reduction in myoclonic seizures or in PGTCS or seizure-free. Concerning tolerability, we ranked AEDs associated with topiramate as moderate-to-severe, while we ranked 59% of AEDs linked to valproate as severe complaints. Moreover, systemic toxicity scores were higher in the valproate group than the topiramate group. We judged the quality of the evidence from the studies to be very low.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Since the last version of this review we found no new studies. This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support topiramate for the treatment of people with JME. Based on the current limited available data, topiramate seems to be better tolerated than valproate, but there were no more benefits of efficacy in topiramate compared with valproate. In the future, well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to test the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME.
Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Fructose; Humans; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid; Young Adult
PubMed: 28434203
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010008.pub3 -
Epilepsy & Behavior : E&B Sep 2023Idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) is a common epilepsy syndrome with early age onset and generally good seizure outcomes. This study aims to determine the incidence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) is a common epilepsy syndrome with early age onset and generally good seizure outcomes. This study aims to determine the incidence and predictive risk factors for drug-resistant IGE.
METHODS
We systematically searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) in November 2022 and included 12 eligible studies which reported long-term outcomes (mean = 14.05) after antiseizure medications (ASMs) from 2001 to 2020. We defined drug resistance as the persistence of any seizure despite ASMs treatment (whether as monotherapies or in combination) given the criteria of drug resistance varied in original studies. A random-effects model was used to evaluate the prevalence of refractory IGE. Studies reporting potential poor prognostic factors were included for subsequent subgroup meta-analysis.
RESULTS
The pooled prevalence of drug resistance in IGE cohorts was 27% (95% CI: 0.19-0.36). Subgroup analysis of the risk factors revealed that the psychiatric comorbidities (odds ratio (OR): 4.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.97-7.98), combined three seizure types (absences, myoclonic jerks, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures) (OR: 5.37, 95% CI: 3.16-9.13), the presence of absence seizure (OR: 4.38, 95% CI: 2.64-7.28), generalized polyspike trains (GPT) (OR: 4.83, 95% CI: 2.42-9.64), sex/catamenial epilepsy (OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.97-5.37), and status epilepticus (OR: 5.94, 95% CI: 2.23-15.85) increased the risk of poor prognosis. Other factors, including age onset, family history, and side effects of ASMs, were insignificantly associated with a higher incidence of refractory IGE.
CONCLUSION
Drug resistance is a severe complication of IGE. Further standardized research about clinical and electroencephalography factors is warranted.
Topics: Humans; Anticonvulsants; Prevalence; Epilepsy, Generalized; Seizures; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Risk Factors; Immunoglobulin E
PubMed: 37523796
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109364 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2015Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum of antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum of antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, there are no current systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in people with JME.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate monotherapy in the treatment of JME.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (2 November 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL via the Cochrane Register of Studies CRSO, 2 November 2015), MEDLINE (Ovid, 2 November 2015), EMBASE (1 July 2015) and ClinicalTrials.gov (2 November 2015). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials, we searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating topiramate monotherapy versus placebo or other AED treatment for people with JME, with the outcomes of proportion of responders or experiencing adverse events (AEs).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality. We performed no meta-analyses due to the limited available data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three studies with 83 participants. For the efficacy, a greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or more reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) compared with participants in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between topiramate versus valproate in participants responding with a 50% or more reduction in myoclonic seizures or in PGTCS or seizure-free. Concerning tolerability, we ranked AEDs associated with topiramate as moderate-to-severe, while we ranked 59% of AEDs linked to valproate as severe complaints. Moreover, systemic toxicity scores were higher in the valproate group than the topiramate group. We judged the quality of the evidence from the studies to be very low.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support topiramate for the treatment of people with JME. Based on the current limited available data, topiramate seems to be better tolerated than valproate, but there were no more benefits of efficacy in topiramate compared with valproate. In the future, well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to test the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME.
Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Fructose; Humans; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid; Young Adult
PubMed: 26695884
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010008.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2019Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Topiramate is a newer broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED). Some studies have shown the benefits of topiramate in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, there are no current systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2015, and last updated in 2017.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in the treatment of JME.
SEARCH METHODS
For the latest update, on 10 July 2018 we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), which includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid 1946- ), and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted study authors and pharmaceutical companies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating topiramate versus placebo or other AED treatment for people with JME, with the outcomes of proportion of responders and proportion of participants experiencing adverse events (AEs).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality. We performed no meta-analyses due to the limited available data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three studies with a total of 83 participants. For efficacy, a greater proportion of participants in the topiramate group had a 50% or more reduction in primarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) compared with participants in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between topiramate and valproate in participants responding with a 50% or more reduction in myoclonic seizures or in PGTCS, or becoming seizure-free. Concerning tolerability, we ranked AEs associated with topiramate as moderate to severe, while we ranked 59% of AEs linked to valproate as severe complaints. Moreover, systemic toxicity scores were higher in the valproate group than the topiramate group.Overall we judged all three studies to be at high risk of attrition bias and at unclear risk of reporting bias. We judged all three studies to be at low to unclear bias for the remaining risk of bias domains (random sequence, allocation, blinding). We judged the quality of the evidence from the studies to be very low.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We have found no new studies since the last version of this review was published in 2017. This review does not provide sufficient evidence to support topiramate for the treatment of people with JME. Based on the current limited available data, topiramate seems to be better tolerated than valproate, but has no clear benefits over valproate in terms of efficacy. Well-designed, double-blind RCTs with large samples are required to test the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in people with JME.
Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Humans; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid; Young Adult
PubMed: 30687937
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010008.pub4 -
Scientific Reports Dec 2021Despite the increased use of medical cannabinoids, the efficacy and safety of the treatment among children remain uncertain. The objective was to study the efficacy and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Despite the increased use of medical cannabinoids, the efficacy and safety of the treatment among children remain uncertain. The objective was to study the efficacy and safety of medical cannabinoids in children. The search included studies through 11-May-2020. Selection criteria included studies evaluating efficacy and safety outcomes of medical cannabinoids (tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and other cannabis derivatives) versus control in children, independently assessed by two reviewers. Eight studies were included, all of which are randomized controlled trials. Cannabidiol is associated with 50% reduction in seizures rate (Relative Risk (RR) = 1.69, 95% CI [1.20-2.36]) and caregiver global impression of change (Median Estimated difference = (- 1), 95%CI [- 1.39-(- 0.60)]) in Dravet syndrome, compared to placebo. While cannabidiol was associated with a reduction in reported seizure events (RR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.36-0.97]), no association was found in products contained also tetrahydrocannabinol (RR = 1.35, 95% CI [0.46-4.03]). Higher dose of cannabidiol was associated with decreased appetite (RR = 2.40, 95% CI [1.39-4.15]). A qualitative assessment suggests that medical cannabinoids might be associated with adverse mental events. In conclusion, cannabidiol is associated with clinical improvement in Dravet syndrome. However, cannabidiol is also associated with decreased appetite. Adverse mental events were reported as well, however, more research should be performed to assess well this outcome.
Topics: Animals; Cannabinoids; Child; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Humans; Medical Marijuana
PubMed: 34873203
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02770-6 -
Epilepsy & Behavior : E&B Aug 2023Reading-induced seizures are presumed to be rare phenomena attributed to an epilepsy syndrome not clearly belonging to either focal or generalized epilepsies. The aim of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Reading-induced seizures are presumed to be rare phenomena attributed to an epilepsy syndrome not clearly belonging to either focal or generalized epilepsies. The aim of the article was to summarize knowledge and recent developments in the field of reading-induced seizures by reviewing all cases for which data were reported within the last three decades.
METHODS
A scoping systematic review of demographic, clinical, electroencephalography (EEG) and imaging data of cases with reading-induced seizures reported in PubMed and Web of Science between 1991-01-01 and 2022-08-21 and a meta-analysis of the findings.
RESULTS
The review included 101 case reports of epilepsy with reading-induced seizures (EwRIS) from 42 articles. The phenomenon was more prevalent among males (67, 66.3% vs. 34, 33.7%) with an average age of onset of 18.3 ± 7.9 years. When reported, 30.8% of patients had a family history of epilepsy. Orofacial reflex myocloni (ORM) were the most frequent manifestation (68, 67.3% cases), other presentations, mostly in addition to ORM, included visual, sensory or cognitive symptoms, non-orofacial myoclonic seizures, and absence seizures. Within the sample, 75 (74.3%) patients were identified as having primary reading epilepsy (PRE), 13 (12.9%) idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE) and 13 (12.9%) focal epilepsies. Advanced EEG and functional imaging data suggest that the basic mechanism of reading-induced seizures is probably similar despite different symptoms and consists of upregulation of the complex cerebral subsystem involved in reading. Ictogenesis and resulting symptomatology may then depend on predominant sensory or proprioceptive stimuli during reading.
CONCLUSION
In most cases, reading-induced seizures were confirmed to belong to a particular epilepsy syndrome of PRE. However, there were substantial subgroups with IGE and focal epilepsies. Most likely, reading-induced seizures occur as an abnormal response to extero- or proprioceptive input into an upregulated cortical network subserving reading. Most recent researchers consider EwRIS a system epilepsy.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Humans; Male; Young Adult; Electroencephalography; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy, Absence; Epilepsy, Generalized; Epilepsy, Reflex; Immunoglobulin E; Myoclonus; Seizures
PubMed: 37437391
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109346