-
Ultraschall in Der Medizin (Stuttgart,... Dec 2021The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effects of simulation-based ultrasound training (SIM-UT) in obstetrics and gynecology... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effects of simulation-based ultrasound training (SIM-UT) in obstetrics and gynecology compared to non-SIM-UT on trainee learning, clinical performance, patient-relevant outcomes, and cost of training.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in June 2019 in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using search terms for the topic and the intervention as well as certain MESH terms. Inclusion criteria were defined in accordance with the PICO question. Studies published in any language involving SIM-UT in obstetrics and gynecology compared to non-SIM-UT or no training were included. The outcomes included effects on health care provider learning and clinical performance, patient-relevant outcomes, and cost of training. Two authors evaluated the study quality with the MERSQI instrument and the Oxford Quality Scoring System. A meta-analysis was planned for the included randomized controlled trials.
RESULTS
15 studies were included, and 11 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. SIM-UT was significantly superior to clinical training only and theoretical teaching with standard mean differences (SMD) of 0.84 (0.08-1.61) and 1.20 (0.37-2.04), respectively. However, SIM-UT was not superior to live model training; SMD of 0.65 (-3.25-4.55). Of all studies included in the meta-analysis, 91 % favored SIM-UT over clinical training alone, theoretical teaching, or in some cases live model training.
CONCLUSION
In the field of obstetrics and gynecology, SIM-UT in addition to clinical training markedly improves trainee learning, clinical performance, as well as patient-perceived quality of care.
Topics: Female; Gynecology; Humans; Obstetrics; Pregnancy; Simulation Training; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 33348415
DOI: 10.1055/a-1300-1680 -
International Journal of Gynaecology... Sep 2021Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome (HPS) is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder with clinical manifestations of bleeding diathesis, multi-organ disease and variable... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome (HPS) is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder with clinical manifestations of bleeding diathesis, multi-organ disease and variable oculocutaneous albinism (OCA). In women, it can cause life-threatening obstetric and gynecological (OB/GYN) bleeding.
OBJECTIVE
To summarize OB/GYN presentations, outcomes, and management strategies in women with HPS.
SEARCH STRATEGY
Main databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar) were searched from inception until June 30, 2020.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Case reports/series of women with confirmed HPS.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines. Methodological quality assessment performed using adapted Newcastle Ottawa scale.
MAIN RESULTS
A total 29 pregnancies in 15 women and 2 gynecological patients were identified. Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), the most common bleeding symptom, was reported in 8/15 (53%) of women. HMB and post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) led to diagnosis of HPS in 5/17 (29%) women. Primary PPH was reported in 12/27 (44%) of viable pregnancies; half were major PPH. In 17 pregnancies with known HPS diagnosis, 9 had hemostatic cover with desmopressin and 8 with platelet transfusion. Major PPH occurred in 3/9 (33%) pregnancies covered with desmopressin compared with none in the platelet group.
CONCLUSION
Diagnosis of HPS should be considered in women with OCA presenting with HMB or PPH. Hemostatic management options include desmopressin and platelet transfusion. Management should be multidisciplinary with close collaboration between OB/GYN and hematology teams.
Topics: Female; Hemorrhage; Hemorrhagic Disorders; Hemostatics; Hermanski-Pudlak Syndrome; Humans; Obstetrics; Pregnancy
PubMed: 33521972
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13632 -
BJOG : An International Journal of... Apr 2024The healthcare sector is responsible for 4%-10% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Considering the broad range of care that obstetricians and gynaecologists provide,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The healthcare sector is responsible for 4%-10% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Considering the broad range of care that obstetricians and gynaecologists provide, mitigation strategies within this specialty could result in significant reductions of the environmental footprint across the whole healthcare industry.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this review was to identify for what services, procedures and products within obstetric and gynaecological care the environmental impact has been studied, to assess the magnitude of such impact and to identify mitigation strategies to diminish it.
SEARCH STRATEGY
The search strategy combined terms related to environmental impact, sustainability, climate change or carbon footprint, with the field of obstetrics and gynaecology.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Articles reporting on the environmental impact of any service, procedure or product within the field of obstetrics and gynaecology were included. Included outcomes covered midpoint impact categories, CO emissions, waste generation and energy consumption.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
A systematic literature search was conducted in the databases of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid) and Scopus, and a grey literature search was performed on Google Scholar and two websites of gynaecological associations.
MAIN RESULTS
The scope of the investigated studies encompassed vaginal births, obstetric and gynaecological surgical procedures, menstrual products, vaginal specula and transportation to gynaecological oncologic consultations. Among the highest yielding mitigation strategies were displacing disposable with reusable materials and minimising content of surgical custom packs. The lowest yielding mitigation strategy was waste optimisation, including recycling.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review highlights opportunities for obstetricians and gynaecologists to decrease their environmental footprint in many ways. More high-quality studies are needed to investigate the environmental impact of other aspects of women's and reproductive health care.
Topics: Female; Humans; Gynecology; Obstetrics; Carbon Footprint
PubMed: 37604701
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17637 -
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology... Apr 2021Obstetricians and gynaecologists are among the highest risk specialties for burnout. There is growing evidence that physician burnout can be both prevented and reduced.... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Obstetricians and gynaecologists are among the highest risk specialties for burnout. There is growing evidence that physician burnout can be both prevented and reduced. We sought to characterize the evidence base for interventions related to the prevention and treatment of burnout in obstetrics and gynaecology DATA SOURCES: We conducted a scoping review following PRISMA guidelines of 5 databases: (Medline-OVID, EMBASE, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and PsycInfo) from inception to March 17, 2020. Citations of relevant articles were hand-searched to maximize sensitivity.
STUDY SELECTION
All interventional study designs were included. The target study population was obstetrics and gynaecology residents, learners, or staff. Published conference posters, papers, and abstracts were eligible for inclusion.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
All extraction and descriptive analysis was completed by two independent reviewers. Outcomes were summarized descriptively. Appraisal was completed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies.
RESULTS
Of the 1540 original database citations, 20 studies met our inclusion criteria. A total of 589 obstetrics/gynaecology participants were included. While there was an overall a lack of research in the field, there were several promising interventions that target residents. There were a combination of preventative interventions (e.g. yoga, nutritional programs, or narrative medicine initiatives) as well as treatments (e.g. counselling appointments or debrief sessions). The vast majority of these interventions focused on individual-specific interventions rather than structural changes. In addition, the majority of interventions appeared to be "proof of concept" and feasability-related studies, with many studies published as conference abstracts rather than peer-reviewed journal publications.
CONCLUSIONS
Institutions should continue to implement interventions that address burnout in obstetrics and gynaecology. Further research is required on long-term outcomes of interventions as well as structural strategies.
Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Burnout, Psychological; Female; Gynecology; Humans; Mental Health; Obstetrics; Occupational Stress; Physicians; Pregnancy; Resilience, Psychological
PubMed: 33373695
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.12.011 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Dec 2024Although early evidence shows that epilepsy can increase the risks of adverse pregnancy, some outcomes are still debatable. We performed a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Although early evidence shows that epilepsy can increase the risks of adverse pregnancy, some outcomes are still debatable. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effects of maternal and fetal adverse outcomes in pregnant women with epilepsy.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were employed to collect studies that investigated the potential risk of obstetric complications during the antenatal, intrapartum, or postnatal period, as well as any neonatal complications. The search was conducted from inception to November 16, 2022. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the included original studies. The odds ratio (OR) values were extracted after adjusting for confounders to measure the relationship between pregnant women with epilepsy and adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. The protocol for this systematic review is registered with PROSPERO ID CRD42023391539.
RESULTS
Of 35 articles identified, there were 142,577 mothers with epilepsy and 34,381,373 mothers without epilepsy. Our study revealed a significant association between pregnant women with epilepsy (PWWE) and the incidence of cesarean section, preeclampsia/eclampsia, gestational hypertension, induction of labor, gestational diabetes and postpartum hemorrhage compared with those without epilepsy. Regarding newborns outcomes, PWWE versus those without epilepsy had increased odds of preterm birth, small for gestational age, low birth weight (<2500 g), and congenital malformations, fetal distress. The odds of operative vaginal delivery, newborn mortality, and Apgar (≤ 7) were similar between PWWE and healthy women.
CONCLUSION
Pregnant women affected by epilepsy encounter a higher risk of adverse obstetric outcomes and fetal complications. Therefore, it is crucial to develop appropriate prevention and intervention strategies prior to or during pregnancy to minimize the negative impacts of epilepsy on maternal and fetal health.
Topics: Humans; Pregnancy; Female; Epilepsy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Outcome; Infant, Newborn
PubMed: 38735863
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2351196 -
Best Practice & Research. Clinical... Aug 2023Of all neonates, 21% are delivered by cesarean section (CS). A long-term maternal complication of an SC is a uterine niche. The aim of this review is to provide an... (Review)
Review
Of all neonates, 21% are delivered by cesarean section (CS). A long-term maternal complication of an SC is a uterine niche. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current literature on imaging techniques and niche-related symptomatology. We performed systematic searches on imaging and niche symptoms. For both searches, 87 new studies were included. Niche evaluation by transvaginal sonography (TVS) or contrast sonohysterography (SHG) proved superior over hysteroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging. Studies that used SHG in a random population identified a niche prevalence of 42%-84%. Niche prevalence differed based on niche definition, symptomatology, and imaging technique. Most studies reported an association with gynecological symptoms, poor reproductive outcomes, obstetrical complications, and reduced quality of life. In conclusion, non-invasive TVS and SHG are the superior imaging modalities to diagnose a niche. Niches are prevalent and strongly associated with gynecological symptoms and poor reproductive outcomes.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Cesarean Section; Quality of Life; Uterus; Hysteroscopy; Ultrasonography; Cicatrix
PubMed: 37506497
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102390 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Sep 2017Teamwork performance is an essential component for the clinical efficiency of multi-professional teams in obstetric care. As patient safety is related to teamwork... (Review)
Review
Teamwork performance is an essential component for the clinical efficiency of multi-professional teams in obstetric care. As patient safety is related to teamwork performance, it has become an important learning goal in simulation-based education. In order to improve teamwork performance, reliable assessment tools are required. These can be used to provide feedback during training courses, or to compare learning effects between different types of training courses. The aim of the current study is to (1) identify the available assessment tools to evaluate obstetric teamwork performance in a simulated environment, and (2) evaluate their psychometric properties in order to identify the most valuable tool(s) to use. We performed a systematic search in PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE to identify articles describing assessment tools for the evaluation of obstetric teamwork performance in a simulated environment. In order to evaluate the quality of the identified assessment tools the standards and grading rules have been applied as recommended by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Committee on Educational Outcomes. The included studies were also assessed according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence. This search resulted in the inclusion of five articles describing the following six tools: Clinical Teamwork Scale, Human Factors Rating Scale, Global Rating Scale, Assessment of Obstetric Team Performance, Global Assessment of Obstetric Team Performance, and the Teamwork Measurement Tool. Based on the ACGME guidelines we assigned a Class 3, level C of evidence, to all tools. Regarding the OCEBM levels of evidence, a level 3b was assigned to two studies and a level 4 to four studies. The Clinical Teamwork Scale demonstrated the most comprehensive validation, and the Teamwork Measurement Tool demonstrated promising results, however it is recommended to further investigate its reliability.
Topics: Clinical Competence; Female; Humans; Obstetrics; Patient Care Team; Pregnancy; Psychometrics
PubMed: 28787688
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.034 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Dec 2023During the lockdown due to COVID-19 pandemic, utilization of emergency care units has been reported to be reduced for obstetrical and gynaecological reasons. The aim of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
During the lockdown due to COVID-19 pandemic, utilization of emergency care units has been reported to be reduced for obstetrical and gynaecological reasons. The aim of this systematic review is to assess if this phenomenon reduced the rate of hospitalizations for any reason and to evaluate the main reasons for seeking care in this subset of the population.
METHODS
The search was conducted using the main electronic databases from January 2020 to May 2021. The studies were identified with the use of a combination of: "emergency department" OR "A&E" OR "emergency service" OR "emergency unit" OR "maternity service" AND "COVID-19" OR "COVID-19 pandemic" OR "SARS-COV-2" and "admission" OR "hospitalization". All the studies that evaluated women going to obstetrics & gynecology emergency department (ED) during the COVID-19 pandemic for any reason were included.
RESULTS
The pooled proportion (PP) of hospitalizations increased from 22.7 to 30.6% during the lockdown periods, in particular from 48.0 to 53.9% for delivery. The PP of pregnant women suffering from hypertensive disorders increased (2.6 vs 1.2%), as well as women having contractions (52 vs 43%) and rupture of membranes (12.0 vs 9.1%). Oppositely, the PP of women having pelvic pain (12.4 vs 14.4%), suspected ectopic pregnancy (1.8 vs 2.0), reduced fetal movements (3.0 vs 3.3%), vaginal bleeding both for obstetrical (11.7 vs 12.8%) and gynecological issues (7.4 vs 9.2%) slightly reduced.
CONCLUSION
During the lockdown, an increase in the proportion of hospitalizations for obstetrical and gynecological reasons has been registered, especially for labor symptoms and hypertensive disorders.
Topics: Female; Pregnancy; Humans; COVID-19; Gynecology; Pandemics; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Communicable Disease Control; Emergency Medical Services; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36894183
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2187254 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Mar 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to conduct a thorough and contemporary assessment of maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with water birth in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to conduct a thorough and contemporary assessment of maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with water birth in comparison with land-based birth.
DATA SOURCES
We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and gray literature sources, from inception to February 28, 2023.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
We included randomized and nonrandomized studies that assessed maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients who delivered either conventionally or while submerged in water.
METHODS
Pooled unadjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model (restricted maximum likelihood method). We assessed the 95% prediction intervals to estimate the likely range of future study results. To evaluate the robustness of the results, we calculated fragility indices. Maternal infection was designated as the primary outcome, whereas postpartum hemorrhage, perineal lacerations, obstetrical anal sphincter injury, umbilical cord avulsion, low Apgar scores, neonatal aspiration requiring resuscitation, neonatal infection, neonatal mortality within 30 days of birth, and neonatal intensive care unit admission were considered secondary outcomes.
RESULTS
Of the 20,642 articles identified, 52 were included in the meta-analyses. Based on data from observational studies, water birth was not associated with increased probability of maternal infection compared with land birth (10 articles, 113,395 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.14). Patients undergoing water birth had decreased odds of postpartum hemorrhage (21 articles, 149,732 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.94). Neonates delivered while submerged in water had increased odds of cord avulsion (10 articles, 91,504 pregnancies; odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.24) and decreased odds of low Apgar scores (21 articles, 165,917 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.82), neonatal infection (15 articles, 53,635 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.97), neonatal aspiration requiring resuscitation (19 articles, 181,001 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.84), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (30 articles, 287,698 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.70).
CONCLUSION
When compared with land birth, water birth does not appear to increase the risk of most maternal and neonatal complications. Like any other delivery method, water birth has its unique considerations and potential risks, which health care providers and expectant parents should evaluate thoroughly. However, with proper precautions in place, water birth can be a reasonable choice for mothers and newborns, in facilities equipped to conduct water births safely.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Delivery, Obstetric; Infant Mortality; Natural Childbirth; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Water
PubMed: 38462266
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.08.034 -
International Journal of Nursing Studies Sep 2023Perineal lacerations could lead to substantial morbidities for women. A reliable prediction model for perineal lacerations has the potential to guide the prevention....
BACKGROUND
Perineal lacerations could lead to substantial morbidities for women. A reliable prediction model for perineal lacerations has the potential to guide the prevention. Although several prediction models have been developed to estimate the risk of perineal lacerations, especially third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations, the evidence about the model quality and clinical applicability is scarce.
OBJECTIVES
To systematically review and critically appraise the existing prediction models for perineal lacerations.
METHODS
Seven databases (PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data) were systematically searched from inception to July 2022. Studies that developed prediction models for perineal lacerations or performed external validation of existing models were considered eligible to include in the systematic review. Two reviewers independently conducted data extraction according to the Checklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies. The risk of bias and the applicability of the included models were assessed with the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis was performed to summarize the characteristics, risk of bias, and performance of existing models.
RESULTS
Of 4345 retrieved studies, 14 studies with 22 prediction models for perineal lacerations were included. The included models mainly aimed to estimate the risk of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations. The top five predictors used were operative vaginal birth (72.7 %), parity/previous vaginal birth (63.6 %), race/ethnicity (59.1 %), maternal age (50.0 %), and episiotomy (40.1 %). Internal and external validation was performed in 12 (54.5 %) and seven (31.8 %) models, respectively. 13 studies (92.9 %) assessed model discrimination, with the c-index ranging from 0.636 to 0.830. Seven studies (50.0 %) evaluated the model calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, Brier score, or calibration curve. The results indicated that most of the models had fairly good calibration. All the included models were at higher risk of bias mainly due to unclear or inappropriate methods for handling missing data and continuous predictors, external validation, and model performance evaluation. Six models (27.3 %) showed low concerns about applicability.
CONCLUSIONS
The existing models for perineal lacerations were poorly validated and evaluated, among which only two have the potential for clinical use: one for women undergoing vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, and the other one for all women undergoing vaginal birth. Future studies should focus on robust external validation of existing models and the development of novel models for second-degree perineal laceration.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022349786.
TWEETABLE ABSTRACT
The existing models for perineal lacerations during childbirth need external validation and updating. Tools are needed for second-degree perineal laceration.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Delivery, Obstetric; Episiotomy; Lacerations; Parity; Perineum; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37423201
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104546