-
Scientific Reports Jul 2021Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world and is influenced by various sociodemographic factors. This meta-analysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world and is influenced by various sociodemographic factors. This meta-analysis aims to determine the worldwide prevalence of POAG in the adult general population for the last 20 years, and explore variation in prevalence by age, gender and geographical location. An electronic literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Population-based cross-sectional or cohort studies published in the last 20 years (2000-2020) that reported prevalence of POAG were recruited. Relevant studies meeting defined eligibility criteria were selected and reviewed systematically by meta-analysis. The prevalence of POAG was analyzed according to various risk factors. A random effect model was used for the meta-analysis. Fifty publications with a total of 198,259 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The worldwide overall prevalence of POAG was 2.4% (95% CI 2.0 ~ 2.8%). The prevalence increases with age. Men are found to be more susceptible to POAG than women (RR 1.28, p < 0.01). Africa is found to have the highest prevalence of POAG (4.0%) among all continents. The current estimated global population of POAG is 68.56 million (95% CI 59.99 ~ 79.98). POAG is a worldwide vision threatening disease with high prevalence for the last 20 years. The population-based prevalence of POAG varies widely across individual studies, due to variations in risk factors of age, gender, and population geographic location.
Topics: Africa; Age Distribution; Blindness; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Male; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Sex Distribution
PubMed: 34215769
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92971-w -
Journal of Glaucoma Aug 2023Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) quantify and compare both costs and measures of efficacy for different interventions. As the costs of glaucoma management to patients,...
PURPOSE
Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) quantify and compare both costs and measures of efficacy for different interventions. As the costs of glaucoma management to patients, payers, and physicians are increasing, we seek to investigate the role of CEAs in the field of glaucoma and how such studies impact clinical management.
METHODS
We adhered to the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" guidelines for our systematic review structure. Eligible studies included any full-text articles that investigated cost-effectiveness or cost-utility as it relates to the field of open angle glaucoma management in the United States. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the validated Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Economic Evaluations.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies were included in the review. Dates of publication ranged from 1983 to 2021. Most of the studies were published in the 2000s and performed CEAs in the domains of treatment/therapy, screening, and adherence for patients with primary angle open glaucoma. Of the 18 articles included, 14 focused on treatment, 2 on screening, and 2 on adherence. Most of these studies focused on the cost-effectiveness of different topical medical therapies, whereas only a few studies explored laser procedures, surgical interventions, or minimally invasive procedures. Economic models using decision analysis incorporating state-transition Markov cycles or Montecarlo simulations were widely used, however, the methodology among studies was variable, with a wide spectrum of inputs, measures of outcomes, and time horizons used.
CONCLUSION
Overall, we found that cost-effectiveness research in glaucoma in the United States remains relatively unstructured, resulting in unclear and conflicting implications for clinical management.
Topics: Humans; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Intraocular Pressure; Glaucoma; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
PubMed: 37311022
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002249 -
Current Medical Research and Opinion Aug 2019We compared the benefits and harms of topical interventions for ocular perfusion pressure in open angle glaucoma. We searched the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
We compared the benefits and harms of topical interventions for ocular perfusion pressure in open angle glaucoma. We searched the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials comparing topical hypotensive agents in glaucoma. Of the 9433 citations identified, 10 randomized controlled trials were included. We summarized data using random effects meta-analysis for post-treatment mean ocular perfusion pressure and using relative risk for adverse events. Ten trials (416 patients) were included. The quality of included trials was low to moderate. There was a higher post-treatment ocular perfusion pressure with bimatoprost compared to timolol (1 trial, 32 patients, mean difference - 4.00 mmHg, 95% confidence interval -7.01 to -0.99, = .009); heterogeneity was not significant ( = 41%, = 13.55, = .09). Prostaglandins as a class had higher post-treatment mean ocular perfusion pressure compared to alternative interventions (5 trials, 147 patients, mean difference 2.19 mmHg, 95% confidence interval 0.67-3.70, = .005); heterogeneity in the subgroup analysis was not significant ( = 10%, = 4.47, = .35). Adverse events were found to be significant in only one of the studies comparing latanoprost to brimonidine, relative risk 3.67 (standard error 0.59, = .03). We identified low to moderate quality evidence describing post-intervention mean ocular perfusion pressure in open angle glaucoma. Bimatoprost increases mean ocular perfusion pressure when compared to timolol. As a class, prostaglandins increase mean ocular perfusion pressure. Prostaglandins may provide beneficial ocular perfusion pressure profiles compared to alternative agents.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Antihypertensive Agents; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30880485
DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1595553 -
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) May 2018Pars plana vitrectomy has been reported to increase the risk of ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma. The authors conducted a systematic review of randomized and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Pars plana vitrectomy has been reported to increase the risk of ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma. The authors conducted a systematic review of randomized and nonrandomized studies to compare the incidence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in vitrectomized versus nonvitrectomized eyes.
METHODS
A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE until August 2016. Data on ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma incidence and mean intraocular pressure after at least 1 year were pooled using random-effects metaanalysis models. Because only nonrandomized studies were retrieved, ROBINS-I tool was used to assess risk of bias in the review.
RESULTS
Seven included studies had a paired design to compare the outcomes of vitrectomized versus fellow eyes, with mean follow-up of least 12 months. Four studies (851 patients) provided data on open-angle glaucoma: incidence in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes was 7.8% and 4.8%, respectively, yielding a metaanalytic odds ratio of 1.67 (95% CI: 1.08-2.57). Six studies (1,060 patients) reported on the occurrence of ocular hypertension, which was 5.8% in vitrectomized eyes versus 3.1% in fellow eyes (odds ratio: 2.03, 95% CI: 0.97-4.22), without significant differences in the mean postoperative intraocular pressure (mean difference 0.31 mmHg, 95% CI: -0.26 to 0.89).
CONCLUSION
Although the review found increased risk of open-angle glaucoma with pars plana vitrectomy, the studies were heterogenous or inconsistent regarding ocular hypertension and intraocular pressure increase. Larger studies should be conducted in homogenous cohorts of patients undergoing macular surgery, excluding complex conditions such as retinal detachment or diabetic retinopathy.
Topics: Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Incidence; Intraocular Pressure; Nerve Fibers; Ocular Hypertension; Retina; Vitrectomy
PubMed: 28426628
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001651 -
Eye (London, England) Apr 2023The XEN45 Gel Stent is a subconjunctival filtering device that has demonstrated promising efficacy. This meta-analysis quantitatively evaluates reported complications... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The XEN45 Gel Stent is a subconjunctival filtering device that has demonstrated promising efficacy. This meta-analysis quantitatively evaluates reported complications and interventions after XEN45 implantation in the treatment of open angle glaucoma (OAG).
METHODS
Pilot, cohort, observational studies, and randomised controlled trials that included at least ten patients undergoing ab interno or externo XEN45 surgery, with or without phacoemulsification were deemed eligible for inclusion. A meta-analysis of proportions with random-effect models was performed using the meta routine in R version 3.2.1. Outcomes included the rate of complications and post-operative interventions.
RESULTS
One hundred and fifty-two studies were identified on initial literature search and 33 were included in final analysis. Numerical hypotony was the most common post-operative complication, involving 20% of patients (95% CI: 10-31%). Post-operative gross hyphema occurred in 14% (95% CI: 7-22%) and transient intra-ocular pressure (IOP) spikes (>30 mmHg) in 13% (95% CI: 4-27%). Stent exposure occurred in 1% (95% CI: 0-2%). Stent migration occurred in 1% (95% CI: 0-3%). XEN45 revision and/or a second XEN45 implantation was performed in 5% of patients (95% CI: 3-7%). Stent relocation was performed in 3% (95% CI: 1-7%). A second glaucoma procedure was performed in 11% (95% CI: 8-15%). 26% underwent one (95% CI: 17-36%), 13% underwent two (95% CI: 5-24%) while 4% underwent three (95% CI: 2-6%) bleb needling procedures. 35% of patients (95% CI: 29-40%) required at least one needling. The average rate of needling per patient was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.20-0.59). However, there is a lack of high-quality data, with 8 of the 33 studies assessed to have a moderate to high risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
While literature suggests that XEN45 Gel Stent implantation is safe in the treatment of OAG, the overall current level of evidence is low and further studies are needed. More than a third of patients require at least one post-operative bleb needling procedure.
Topics: Humans; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Blister; Treatment Outcome; Glaucoma; Intraocular Pressure; Glaucoma Drainage Implants; Stents; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35347294
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02022-5 -
The British Journal of Ophthalmology Nov 2020The only widely accepted, effective treatment for open-angle glaucoma (OAG) is to reduce the intraocular pressure (IOP), with medical therapy being the typical... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The only widely accepted, effective treatment for open-angle glaucoma (OAG) is to reduce the intraocular pressure (IOP), with medical therapy being the typical first-line therapy. Notably, an alternative therapy is selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT), which is safe and effective in lowering the IOP. Nonetheless, whether SLT could replace medication as the first-line therapy for OAG is still under debate.
METHODS
Studies involving randomised controlled trials conducted before August 2019 that compared the efficacy of SLT-related and medication-only treatments for OAG were selected from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology was employed to rate the quality of the body of evidence.
RESULTS
1229 patients in eight trials were included. The overall results revealed no significant differences between SLT-related and medication-only treatments regarding the IOP reduction (mean difference (MD): 0.18, 95% CI -0.72 to 1.07, p=0.70, I=73%) and the success rate of IOP control (risk ratio: 1.02, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.04, p=0.74, I=0%). The SLT-related therapy group required significantly fewer medications compared with the medication-only group (MD: -1.06, 95% CI -1.16 to -0.96, p<0.0000, I=5%). A quantitative analysis was not performed concerning adverse events and quality of life because of the limited data available.
CONCLUSION
SLT is safe and has a lower incidence of ocular side effects. SLT can be the choice of first-line therapy for OAG. However, clinicians should consider the cost-effectiveness, as well as the patient's characteristics, before deciding on the therapeutic option.
Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Laser Therapy; Lasers, Solid-State; Male; Quality Assurance, Health Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tonometry, Ocular; Trabecular Meshwork; Trabeculectomy
PubMed: 32051136
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315613 -
PloS One 2013To examine possible differences in clinical outcomes between selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) and argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) in open-angle glaucoma at... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To examine possible differences in clinical outcomes between selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) and argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) in open-angle glaucoma at different times post-treatment.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SLT versus ALT were searched through August 2013. The main outcome measure was IOP, and secondary outcomes included the number of glaucoma medications, the success rate, and adverse events.
RESULTS
Six RCTs, involving 482 eyes treated with laser trabeculoplasty, were included in the meta-analysis. For all patients (including first and previous laser trabeculoplasy), no significant difference in IOP lowering was observed between SLT and ALT at one hour (P = 0.40), one week (P = 0.72), one month (P = 0.37), six months (P = 0.08), one year (P = 0.34), two years (P = 0.58), three years (P = 0.34), four years (P = 0.47), and five years (P = 0.50). A statistically significant difference in favor of SLT was found when comparing the IOP reduction at three months after intervention (weighted mean difference (WMD): 1.19 mmHg [0.41; 1.97]; I(2)=0%; P = 0.003). For patients who were naive to laser, there was no significant difference of reduction in IOP comparing SLT with ALT at any time point. In patients' previous LT, no statistically significant difference in IOP reduction was found at six months (WMD: 1.92 mmHg [-0.91; 4.74]; I(2) = 77.3%; P = 0.18). There was no significant difference in the reduction in the number of glaucoma medications, the success rate, or adverse event rates between the two treatments.
CONCLUSIONS
SLT has equivalent efficacy to ALT with a similar constellation of side effects. In the case of retreatment, SLT appears to be similar to ALT in IOP lowering at six months.
Topics: Argon; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Lasers; Trabeculectomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24367649
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084270 -
Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical... Aug 2009A 2005 meta-analysis suggests that lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) or open-angle glaucoma (OAG) is beneficial in reducing... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
A 2005 meta-analysis suggests that lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) or open-angle glaucoma (OAG) is beneficial in reducing the risk for visual field loss in the long term.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and toler-ability of travoprost and latanoprost in patients with OAG or OHT.
METHODS
Pertinent studies published from 1996 to 2008 were identified using systematic searches of major literature databases, including the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Chinese Biomedicine Database. Internet searches of major search engines, professional associations' Web sites, and manufacturers' databases were also performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of travoprost 0.004% and latanoprost 0.005% in patients with OAG or OHT were selected. The primary efficacy measure was the weighted mean difference (WMD) in the IOP reduction (IOPR). The primary tolerability measure was the relative risk (RR) for adverse events. The pooled effects were calculated using the random-effects model.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies (1491 patients) were included in the meta-analysis, 4 of which were of poor quality based on Jadad scoring. Travoprost was associated with significantly greater diurnal mean IOPRs compared with latanoprost at 2 weeks and 2 months (WMDs [95% CI] mm Hg: 2 weeks, 1.47 [0.33 to 2.62]; 2 months, 0.71 [0.04 to 1.38]); these values were not significant at 1 (0.81 [-0.78 to 2.40]), 3 (0.01 [-0.50 to 0.52]), and 6 months (0.27 [-0.40 to 0.95]). When the 4 studies of low quality were excluded, no significant treatment differences in diurnal IOPR were found. IOPR measured at 5 pm was significantly greater with travoprost compared with latanoprost at 2 weeks (WMD [95% CI], 0.87 mm Hg [0.40 to 1.33]); these values were not significant at 1 (WMD [95% CI], 0.60 mm Hg [0.00 to 1.20], 2 (0.65 [-0.69 to 1.99]), 3 (0.04 [-0.51 to 0.59]), 6 (0.00 [-0.68 to 0.68]), and 12 months (0.30 [-0.36 to 0.96]). Travoprost was associated with a significantly greater frequency of hyperemia than was latanoprost (RR = 1.72 [95% CI, 1.33 to 2.23]). Rates of serious ocular adverse events did not differ significantly between travoprost and latanoprost (cystoid macular edema: RR = 0.22 [95% CI, 0.03 to 1.76]; cataract: RR = 2.29 [95% CI, 0.90 to 5.83]).
CONCLUSIONS
The findings from the present meta-analysis of these 17 RCTs suggest that there were no significant differences between travoprost and latanoprost in IOPR in these patients with OHT or OAG. Both agents were generally well tolerated.
PubMed: 24683242
DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2009.08.006 -
PloS One 2020Fixed-combination (FC) therapy is used in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) patients who require more than one medication to reach their... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The efficacy of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol versus other fixed combinations for primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Fixed-combination (FC) therapy is used in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) patients who require more than one medication to reach their target intraocular pressure (IOP). Currently, there are several FC therapies available for the treatment of glaucoma. The FC of latanoprost/timolol (LTFC) is a commonly used FC. Here, we conducted systematic review to compare the IOP-lowering effects of LTFC with other FCs for patients with POAG and OHT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized-controlled clinical trials and cross-over studies. The outcomes were mean IOP and IOP fluctuation after one month of treatment. Meta-analysis was carried out using RevMan (version 5.1) software. After conducting meta-analyses, we rated the quality of each meta-analysis as high, moderate, low, or very low using the "GRADE" system.
RESULTS
We included 16 trials in this meta-analysis. Moderate-quality meta-analysis showed that LTFC had a comparable mean IOP to that of a fixed combination of travoprost and timolol (TTFC) [mean difference (MD): 0.07 mmHg] and a fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol (DTFC) [MD: -0.31 mmHg], and it also had a comparable IOP-fluctuation effect compared to that of TTFC [MD: 0.13 mm Hg] and DTFC [MD: 0.25 mmHg]. Compared to the fixed combination of bimatoprost and timolol (BiTFC), moderate-quality evidence showed a higher mean IOP in the LTFC group [MD 0.76 mmHg], whereas low-quality meta-analysis showed higher IOP fluctuation [MD 1.09 mmHg] in the LTFC group.
CONCLUSIONS
LTFC is as effective as TTFC and DTFC, but worse than BiTFC in controlling mean IOP and IOP fluctuation for POAG or OHT patients. The quality of our meta-analyses was assessed as moderate, with the exception of one low-quality analysis that compared the IOP fluctuation of LTFC and BiTFC.
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Bimatoprost; Drug Combinations; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Male; Ocular Hypertension; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Timolol; Travoprost; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32106236
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229682 -
Survey of Ophthalmology 2018Cataract extraction is a safe and effective surgery that has been performed in its modern form for several decades. Many studies have noted that cataract extraction... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Cataract extraction is a safe and effective surgery that has been performed in its modern form for several decades. Many studies have noted that cataract extraction could also have a clinically significant role in the control of comorbid glaucoma. Lens extraction decreases the pressure within the eye, and intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only controllable risk factor in glaucoma proven to be effective. A systematic analysis of current evidence is needed to establish strong practice patterns and identify areas where further research is required. We performed systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical data to estimate the net effect of cataract surgery on IOP. A total of 37 treatment arms from 32 different studies from January 1997 to January 2017 were included. IOP reduction was highly correlated across follow-up periods. For angle-closure glaucoma, results showed an IOP decrease of -6.4 mmHg (95% CI: -9.4 to -3.4) at final follow-up (12 months and longer). For the open-angle glaucoma group, there was an overall IOP change of -2.7 mmHg (95% CI -3.7 to -1.7) from baseline. For pseudoexfoliation glaucoma further research is needed to reach an adequate evidence-based conclusion. The influence of inherent sources of bias, including loss to follow-up, washout and medication use, and lack of a control group, was evaluated numerically. These sources of bias pulled the IOP estimate in opposite directions and are therefore unlikely to affect the main conclusions substantially. Future prospective clinical trials, including other outcomes such as quality of life, clinical severity information, and cost-effectiveness analysis, are needed to determine the role of phacoemulsification alone within the glaucoma treatment algorithm.
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Glaucoma; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Ocular Hypertension; Phacoemulsification
PubMed: 28887138
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.08.006