-
Eye (London, England) Nov 2022To estimate the risk of blindness with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) compared to primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in those population-based studies that... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
To estimate the risk of blindness with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) compared to primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in those population-based studies that reported blindness rates for both PACG and POAG.
METHOD
A systematic search was performed in PubMed for articles published in English between 2000 and 2020 reporting the prevalence of POAG as well as PACG among various ethnic populations. A study was included if it was (1) population-based (2) had published prevalence and blindness rates for both PACG and POAG in the same cohort. (3) Glaucoma was defined as per the International Society for Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology (ISGEO) criteria. The proportion of blindness for both POAG and PACG for each study and the cumulative proportion taking all the studies were calculated.
RESULTS
We included 23 studies with 78,434 participants. POAG was diagnosed in 1702 persons with 151 (8.9%) blind. There were 724 cases of PACG with 196 (27.0%) blind. The risk ratio of blindness in PACG to POAG varied from 0.73 to 10.6 among the studies. The cumulative risk ratio was 2.39 (95% confidence interval (CI); 1.99, 2.87). Risk ratios for studies including visual field restriction while defining blindness were similar to studies that did not (1.92 vs 2.64, P = 0.11). Risk ratios were also similar for studies that used greater than 2 instead of 3 or more quadrants of iridotrabecular contact to define angle closure (2.79 vs 2.25).
CONCLUSION
Primary angle-closure disease is more likely to be associated with blindness.
Topics: Humans; Blindness; Glaucoma; Glaucoma, Angle-Closure; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Intraocular Pressure; Visual Field Tests
PubMed: 34645961
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01802-9 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Jun 2011Glaucoma is characterised by progressive optic neuropathy and peripheral visual field loss. It affects 1% to 2% of white people aged over 40 years and accounts for 8% of... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Glaucoma is characterised by progressive optic neuropathy and peripheral visual field loss. It affects 1% to 2% of white people aged over 40 years and accounts for 8% of new blind registrations in the UK. The main risk factor for glaucoma is raised intraocular pressure, but 40% of people with glaucoma have normal intraocular pressure and only 10% of people with raised intraocular pressure are at risk of optic-nerve damage. Glaucoma is more prevalent, presents earlier, and is more difficult to control in black people than in white populations.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments for established primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, or both? What are the effects of lowering intraocular pressure in people with normal-tension glaucoma? What are the effects of treatment for acute angle-closure glaucoma? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 12 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: laser trabeculoplasty (alone or plus topical medical treatment), topical medical treatments, and surgical trabeculectomy.
Topics: Glaucoma; Glaucoma, Angle-Closure; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Ocular Hypertension
PubMed: 21658300
DOI: No ID Found -
Frontiers in Medicine 2022As monotherapy is insufficient for some patients, the existing fixed-dose combination (FDC) requires two or more daily administrations with declining adherence. The...
Efficacy and safety of netarsudil/latanoprost fixed-dose combination vs. monotherapy in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE
As monotherapy is insufficient for some patients, the existing fixed-dose combination (FDC) requires two or more daily administrations with declining adherence. The present study compared the efficacy and safety of netarsudil/latanoprost FDC with monotherapy of its individual components in patients with glaucoma.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed for studies comparing netarsudil/latanoprost fixed-dose combination (FDC) vs. monotherapy in patients with glaucoma. The primary endpoints included intraocular pressure (IOP), intraocular pressure reduction percentage (IOPR%) and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS
Three randomized controlled trial studies (RCTs) involving 1,692 patients (FDC: 556, netarsudil: 577, latanoprost: 559) were included in this meta-analysis. FDC was more effective than netarsudil, with significantly lower diurnal IOP over three time points (8:00 a.m., 10:00 a.m., 4:00 p.m.), mean diurnal IOP (MD = -2.36 [-3.08, -1.63], < 0.00001) and higher IOPR% (MD = 9.60 [7.86, 11.33], < 0.00001). When comparing FDC with latanoprost, both mean diurnal IOP (MD = -1.64 [-2.05, -1.23], < 0.00001) and diurnal IOP across 3 time points were significantly lower with FDC than with latanoprost, while FDC induced significantly higher IOPR% (MD = 6.09 [4.40, 7.77], < 0.00001). Incidence of total AEs was similar between netarsudil and FDC, but higher with FDC than with latanoprost.
CONCLUSION
Netarsudil/latanoprost FDC appears to be superior to netarsudil or latanoprost alone, with better ocular hypotensive effects. However, there are concerns that netarsudil/latanoprost FDC was associated with a significantly higher incidence of AEs specifically compared with latanoprost.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=311956.
PubMed: 35979215
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.923308 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Mar 2024In order to support the positioning of Rho kinase inhibitors (Rhokis) in the European market for the treatment of glaucoma, scientific evidence comparing the efficacy... (Review)
Review
In order to support the positioning of Rho kinase inhibitors (Rhokis) in the European market for the treatment of glaucoma, scientific evidence comparing the efficacy and safety of Rhokis and beta-blockers (β-βs) in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma after 3 months was assembled through a systematic review and meta-analysis (meta-A) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Relevant articles were searched for on PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Of the 251 articles found, three met all eligibility criteria. These three articles were assessed for risk of bias. Data were extracted and a random effects meta-A was performed. The studies' methods were homogeneous but there was great heterogeneity within the data (I = 92-93%; < 0.001). All studies had low risk of bias. The meta-A showed statistically better efficacy of β-βs, resulting in an intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction mean difference of 1.73 (1.19-2.27) at 8 a.m., 0.66 (0.19-1.15) at 10 a.m. and 0.49 mmHg (0.001-0.98) at 4 p.m., compared to Rhokis. This difference is not clinically significant as intra-operator variability of IOP measurements varies from ±2 to ±3 mmHg The adverse effects of Rhokis were essentially topical, whereas β-βs mainly caused systemic side effects. This Meta-A showed that Rhokis are clinically non-inferior to beta-blockers in reducing IOP. Rhokis have a better safety profile.
PubMed: 38541970
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061747 -
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Feb 2024To investigate differences in peripapillary choroidal thickness (PPCT) between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), normal tension glaucoma (NTG), and healthy eyes,... (Review)
Review
TOPIC
To investigate differences in peripapillary choroidal thickness (PPCT) between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), normal tension glaucoma (NTG), and healthy eyes, additionally comparing differences between POAG and NTG eyes.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Peripapillary choroidal thickness is a well-established OCT parameter in eyes with glaucoma and other ocular pathologies. The relationship between PPCT and glaucoma, if better understood, may facilitate the development of PPCT as a potential diagnostic and monitoring metric for glaucoma. In particular, there has yet to be a synthesis that directly compares PPCT between POAG eyes and NTG eyes.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, identifying studies from inception to December 2022. We included studies that measured PPCT using OCT in POAG, NTG, and healthy eyes. Mean difference (MD) among groups was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.2.0. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS).
RESULTS
Eighteen studies were included in this meta-analysis, with a pooled total of 935 healthy control eyes, 446 NTG eyes, and 934 POAG eyes. There was a significant reduction of PPCT in POAG eyes compared with healthy eyes [MD = -16.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) (-27.55 to -5.09)]. Reduction in PPCT was also significant in NTG eyes compared with healthy eyes [MD = -34.96; 95% CI (-49.97 to -19.95)]. NTG eyes had significantly reduced PPCT compared with POAG eyes [MD = -26.64; 95% CI (-49.00 to -4.28)].
CONCLUSIONS
Glaucomatous eyes appear to have significantly reduced PPCT compared with normal healthy eyes. In addition, PPCT in NTG eyes appear significantly thinner compared with that in POAG eyes.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
PubMed: 38403265
DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2024.02.008 -
Health Technology Assessment... Oct 2007To assess whether open angle glaucoma (OAG) screening meets the UK National Screening Committee criteria, to compare screening strategies with case finding, to estimate... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To assess whether open angle glaucoma (OAG) screening meets the UK National Screening Committee criteria, to compare screening strategies with case finding, to estimate test parameters, to model estimates of cost and cost-effectiveness, and to identify areas for future research.
DATA SOURCES
Major electronic databases were searched up to December 2005.
REVIEW METHODS
Screening strategies were developed by wide consultation. Markov submodels were developed to represent screening strategies. Parameter estimates were determined by systematic reviews of epidemiology, economic evaluations of screening, and effectiveness (test accuracy, screening and treatment). Tailored highly sensitive electronic searches were undertaken.
RESULTS
Most potential screening tests reviewed had an estimated specificity of 85% or higher. No test was clearly most accurate, with only a few, heterogeneous studies for each test. No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of screening were identified. Based on two treatment RCTs, early treatment reduces the risk of progression. Extrapolating from this, and assuming accelerated progression with advancing disease severity, without treatment the mean time to blindness in at least one eye was approximately 23 years, compared to 35 years with treatment. Prevalence would have to be about 3-4% in 40 year olds with a screening interval of 10 years to approach cost-effectiveness. It is predicted that screening might be cost-effective in a 50-year-old cohort at a prevalence of 4% with a 10-year screening interval. General population screening at any age, thus, appears not to be cost-effective. Selective screening of groups with higher prevalence (family history, black ethnicity) might be worthwhile, although this would only cover 6% of the population. Extension to include other at-risk cohorts (e.g. myopia and diabetes) would include 37% of the general population, but the prevalence is then too low for screening to be considered cost-effective. Screening using a test with initial automated classification followed by assessment by a specialised optometrist, for test positives, was more cost-effective than initial specialised optometric assessment. The cost-effectiveness of the screening programme was highly sensitive to the perspective on costs (NHS or societal). In the base-case model, the NHS costs of visual impairment were estimated as 669 pounds. If annual societal costs were 8800 pounds, then screening might be considered cost-effective for a 40-year-old cohort with 1% OAG prevalence assuming a willingness to pay of 30,000 pounds per quality-adjusted life-year. Of lesser importance were changes to estimates of attendance for sight tests, incidence of OAG, rate of progression and utility values for each stage of OAG severity. Cost-effectiveness was not particularly sensitive to the accuracy of screening tests within the ranges observed. However, a highly specific test is required to reduce large numbers of false-positive referrals. The findings that population screening is unlikely to be cost-effective are based on an economic model whose parameter estimates have considerable uncertainty. In particular, if rate of progression and/or costs of visual impairment are higher than estimated then screening could be cost-effective.
CONCLUSIONS
While population screening is not cost-effective, the targeted screening of high-risk groups may be. Procedures for identifying those at risk, for quality assuring the programme, as well as adequate service provision for those screened positive would all be needed. Glaucoma detection can be improved by increasing attendance for eye examination, and improving the performance of current testing by either refining practice or adding in a technology-based first assessment, the latter being the more cost-effective option. This has implications for any future organisational changes in community eye-care services. Further research should aim to develop and provide quality data to populate the economic model, by conducting a feasibility study of interventions to improve detection, by obtaining further data on costs of blindness, risk of progression and health outcomes, and by conducting an RCT of interventions to improve the uptake of glaucoma testing.
Topics: Age Factors; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease Progression; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Sensitivity and Specificity; Technology Assessment, Biomedical; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vision Screening
PubMed: 17927922
DOI: 10.3310/hta11410 -
Biology Direct Oct 2023The social impact of glaucoma is worth of note: primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness worldwide, affecting some 68.56... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The social impact of glaucoma is worth of note: primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness worldwide, affecting some 68.56 million people with overall prevalence of 2.4%. Since one of the main risk factors for the development of POAG is the increase of intraocular pressure (IOP) causing retinal ganglion cells death, the medical treatment of POAG consists in the use of drugs endowed with neuroprotective effect and able to reduce IOP. These drugs include beta-blockers, prostaglandin analogues, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, alpha or cholinergic agonists and rho kinase inhibitors. However, not all the patients respond to the same extent to the therapy in terms of efficacy and safety. Genetics and genome wide association studies have highlighted the occurrence of mutations and polymorphisms influencing the predisposition to develop POAG and its phenotype, as well as affecting the response to pharmacological treatment. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims at identifying genetic variants and at verifying whether these can influence the responsiveness of patients to therapy for efficacy and safety. It follows the most updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 recommendations. The literature search was conducted consulting the most relevant scientific databases, i.e. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Public Health Genomics and Precision Health Knowledge Base up to June 14th, 2023. The search retrieved 1026 total records, among which eight met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the analysis. The results demonstrated that the most investigated pharmacogenetic associations concern latanoprost and timolol, and that efficacy was studied more in depth than safety. Moreover, the heterogeneity of design and paucity of studies prompt further investigation in randomized clinical trials. In fact, adequately powered and designed pharmacogenetic association studies are needed to provide body of evidence with good certainty for a more appropriate use of medical therapy in POAG.PROSPERO registration: CRD42023434867.
Topics: Humans; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Antihypertensive Agents; Genome-Wide Association Study; Timolol; Genotype
PubMed: 37833756
DOI: 10.1186/s13062-023-00423-4 -
American Journal of Ophthalmology Sep 2014To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between blood pressure levels and hypertension with primary open-angle glaucoma and intraocular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between blood pressure levels and hypertension with primary open-angle glaucoma and intraocular pressure endpoints.
DESIGN
Systematic review with quantitative meta-analysis.
METHODS
Studies were identified by searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Inverse-variance weighted random-effects models were used to summarize relative risks. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to explore potential sources of heterogeneity across studies.
RESULTS
Sixty observational studies were included. The pooled relative risk for primary open-angle glaucoma comparing patients with hypertension to those without hypertension was 1.16 (95% CI = 1.05-1.28), with modest heterogeneity across studies (I(2) 34.5%). Virtually all studies reported a positive association between blood pressure and intraocular pressure (IOP). The pooled average increase in IOP associated with a 10 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure was 0.26 mm Hg (95% CI 0.23-0.28, I(2) 30.7%), and the average increase associated with a 5 mm Hg increase in diastolic blood pressure was 0.17 mm Hg (95% CI 0.11-0.23, I(2) 90.5%).
CONCLUSIONS
In this meta-analysis, hypertension was associated with increased intraocular pressure. The association between hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma was stronger in cross-sectional compared with case-control and longitudinal studies. Our findings support a role of increased blood pressure in elevated intraocular pressure and possibly in the development of glaucoma.
Topics: Blood Pressure; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Global Health; Humans; Hypertension; Incidence; Intraocular Pressure; Risk Factors
PubMed: 24879946
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.05.029 -
PharmacoEconomics - Open Mar 2020Our objective was to review, compare and gain insight into economic evaluations in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with a focus on existing decision analytic models. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Our objective was to review, compare and gain insight into economic evaluations in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with a focus on existing decision analytic models.
METHODS
A literature review was performed using clinical and specialized databases following best practices. Relevant inclusion criteria included the development of a decision analytic model, the assessment of POAG interventions, and a full economic evaluation in terms of costs and health-related outcomes. Model inputs and settings were extracted, compared and analyzed. Main study incremental outcomes were also reported.
RESULTS
The literature review identified 22 full articles in alignment with the eligibility criteria for a total of 15 countries and a wide range of years from 1983 to 2018. Interventions included as competing alternatives in the eligible studies were topical medications (33%), screening or diagnosis (33%), surgical interventions (10%), laser trabeculoplasty (10%) and minimally invasive surgeries (3%). Markov models using transition states were the most common type of modeling approach. Cost-utility models using a mid- to long-term time horizon with a national payer perspective were the most frequent type of economic evaluation identified. Model states commonly included disease severity levels, as defined by glaucoma staging systems, and other relevant events such as blindness and death. Authors did not sufficiently justify key modeling assumptions, inputs or the robustness of their findings.
CONCLUSIONS
Decision analytic models in POAG can reasonably guide future modeling research by revealing common practices, inputs and assumptions. Furthermore, this review revealed evidence gaps in terms of unexplored interventions and treatment sequences.
PubMed: 31111447
DOI: 10.1007/s41669-019-0141-4 -
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology May 2023Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness in the world, with an estimated 57.5 million people suffering from glaucoma globally. Treatment of glaucoma focuses on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness in the world, with an estimated 57.5 million people suffering from glaucoma globally. Treatment of glaucoma focuses on lowering intra-ocular pressure to prevent progression of visual field defects, which is the only proven method for treating this disease. Yoga practices are believed to lower intra-ocular pressure in the eyes and prevent further damage in patients with glaucoma. Therefore, this systematic review was planned to explore the available scientific studies on yoga and intra-ocular pressure in glaucoma patients. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were the basis for the investigation of the literature. The Jadad Scale was used to assess the quality of included clinical trials, and the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess the quality of included case studies. Based on the quality assessment and eligibility, six studies on yoga and intra-ocular pressure in glaucoma patients carried out between 2007 and 2021 were included in the final review. The results showed a reduction in intra-ocular pressure in patients with glaucoma through Jyoti-trataka (gazing steadily on a point or candle flame) and some other slow yogic breathing techniques, whereas studies on inversion Asanas (yoga postures) showed a rapid increase in intra-ocular pressure soon after starting. The three high-quality RCTs included in the meta-analysis showed a greater improvement in intra-ocular pressure in the yoga groups in both eyes than in the control groups; however, there were some limitations related to a small sample size, study quality, a long-term follow-up period, and variations in the yoga practices. Therefore, further studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up are needed to overcome the limitations for a better understanding.
Topics: Humans; Yoga; Glaucoma; Intraocular Pressure; Tonometry, Ocular; Blindness
PubMed: 37203026
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2054_22