-
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) 2023Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness. Early DR screening is essential, but the infrastructure can be less affordable in low resource countries. This... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness. Early DR screening is essential, but the infrastructure can be less affordable in low resource countries. This study aims to review the accuracy of low-cost smartphone-based fundus cameras for DR screening in adult patients with diabetes.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature search to find studies that reported the sensitivity and specificity of low-cost smartphone-based devices for fundus photography in adult patients with diabetes. We searched three databases (MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Scopus) and one register (Cochrane CENTRAL). We presented the accuracy values by grouping the diagnosis into three: any DR, referrable DR, and diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Risk of bias and applicability of the studies were assessed using QUADAS-2.
RESULTS
Five out of 294 retrieved records were included with a total of six smartphone-based devices reviewed. All of the reference diagnostic methods used in the included studies were either indirect ophthalmoscopy or slit-lamp examinations and all smartphone-based devices' imaging protocols used mydriatic drops. The reported sensitivity and specificity for any DR were 52-92.2% and 73.3-99%; for referral DR were 21-91.4% and 64.9-100%; and for DMO were 29.4-81% and 95-100%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Sensitivity available low-cost smartphone-based devices for DR screening were acceptable and their specificity particularly for detecting referrable DR and DMO were considerably good. These findings support their potential utilization for DR screening in a low resources setting.
PubMed: 37614846
DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S416422 -
JBI Library of Systematic Reviews 2011Regular eye examinations are important to aid in early detection of diabetic retinopathy. Screening methods include ophthalmoscopy, retinal photography and variations of...
BACKGROUND
Regular eye examinations are important to aid in early detection of diabetic retinopathy. Screening methods include ophthalmoscopy, retinal photography and variations of both. Digital retinal photography (DRP) is being increasingly adopted. The gold standard is to photograph seven visual fields, in practice, however, fewer fields such as single, two or three fields are used, to reduce cost and time. There is no existing review comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the single, two and three-field DRP.
OBJECTIVES
To perform a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of the single, two and three field DRP for screening diabetic retinopathy.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
All patients with diabetes mellitus who attended an eye screening were included. Studies which include digital retinal imaging techniques that capture single, two or three visual images were considered.To be included, studies must have compared the technique to a reference standard, either the seven-field stereoscopic fundus photography (7SF) or indirect ophthalmoscopy.
TYPES OF OUTCOMES
The main outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of the screening technique.
SEARCH STRATEGY
Search was carried out, for the time period 1985 to December 2008, for full text papers and conference abstracts.
METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY
Methodological quality of included studies was assessed by two reviewers using an adapted version of the critical appraisal tool for diagnostic studies developed by the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme at the Public Health Resource Unit.
DATA COLLECTION
Data from included studies were extracted using a modified JBI data extraction tool.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Studies were grouped by the reference standard used and summarised using tabular and narrative formats.
RESULTS
Twenty-two primary studies met the review criteria. Fifteen studies used a single field, five applied two-field and seven applied three-field. There was great heterogeneity among the studies. Using 7SF as a reference standard, the sensitivity (for detecting any retinopathy) of the single, two and three fields ranged from: 66%-87%, 86%-98%, and 66%-98%. For indirect ophthalmoscopy, sensitivity ranged from 38%-100%, 83%-97%, and 90%-97%. The corresponding specificity for 7SF was 45%-96%, 78%-95%, 72%-86%; for indirect ophthalmoscopy was 47%-100%, 79%-100%, 90%-98%. Five studies comparing more than one field type had a general trend of higher sensitivity and lower specificity with increasing number of fields. Pupil dilation led to a lower proportion of ungradeable images.
CONCLUSIONS
The review findings are limited by the heterogeneity between studies and the number of studies comparing more than one screening type. Evidence for the optimal number of screening fields is not conclusive.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
Until further research is available for stronger comparisons to be made, single field DRP would be the option requiring less time and lower costs. Dilation should be applied to reduce ungradeable images. Older age, smaller pupil size, and presence of cataract are associated with ungradeable images.
IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH
There is a strong recommendation for field specialists to achieve consensus on DRP methods including a standard scale for grading diabetic retinopathy and common threshold for referrable retinopathy. Future studies should consider following the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD). A prospective study comparing the single, two and three fields, with and without dilation will provide the required evidence for optimal number of fields.
PubMed: 27820519
DOI: 10.11124/01938924-201109160-00001 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2015The diagnosis of glaucoma is traditionally based on the finding of optic nerve head (ONH) damage assessed subjectively by ophthalmoscopy or photography or by... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The diagnosis of glaucoma is traditionally based on the finding of optic nerve head (ONH) damage assessed subjectively by ophthalmoscopy or photography or by corresponding damage to the visual field assessed by automated perimetry, or both. Diagnostic assessments are usually required when ophthalmologists or primary eye care professionals find elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) or a suspect appearance of the ONH. Imaging tests such as confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (HRT), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry (SLP, as used by the GDx instrument), provide an objective measure of the structural changes of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and ONH parameters occurring in glaucoma.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of HRT, OCT and GDx for diagnosing manifest glaucoma by detecting ONH and RNFL damage.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched several databases for this review. The most recent searches were on 19 February 2015.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included prospective and retrospective cohort studies and case-control studies that evaluated the accuracy of OCT, HRT or the GDx for diagnosing glaucoma. We excluded population-based screening studies, since we planned to consider studies on self-referred people or participants in whom a risk factor for glaucoma had already been identified in primary care, such as elevated IOP or a family history of glaucoma. We only considered recent commercial versions of the tests: spectral domain OCT, HRT III and GDx VCC or ECC.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We adopted standard Cochrane methods. We fitted a hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) model using the METADAS macro in SAS software. After studies were selected, we decided to use 2 x 2 data at 0.95 specificity or closer in meta-analyses, since this was the most commonly-reported level.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 106 studies in this review, which analysed 16,260 eyes (8353 cases, 7907 controls) in total. Forty studies (5574 participants) assessed GDx, 18 studies (3550 participants) HRT, and 63 (9390 participants) OCT, with 12 of these studies comparing two or three tests. Regarding study quality, a case-control design in 103 studies raised concerns as it can overestimate accuracy and reduce the applicability of the results to daily practice. Twenty-four studies were sponsored by the manufacturer, and in 15 the potential conflict of interest was unclear.Comparisons made within each test were more reliable than those between tests, as they were mostly based on direct comparisons within each study.The Nerve Fibre Indicator yielded the highest accuracy (estimate, 95% confidence interval (CI)) among GDx parameters (sensitivity: 0.67, 0.55 to 0.77; specificity: 0.94, 0.92 to 0.95). For HRT measures, the Vertical Cup/Disc (C/D) ratio (sensitivity: 0.72, 0.60 to 0.68; specificity: 0.94, 0.92 to 0.95) was no different from other parameters. With OCT, the accuracy of average RNFL retinal thickness was similar to the inferior sector (0.72, 0.65 to 0.77; specificity: 0.93, 0.92 to 0.95) and, in different studies, to the vertical C/D ratio.Comparing the parameters with the highest diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for each device in a single HSROC model, the performance of GDx, HRT and OCT was remarkably similar. At a sensitivity of 0.70 and a high specificity close to 0.95 as in most of these studies, in 1000 people referred by primary eye care, of whom 200 have manifest glaucoma, such as in those who have already undergone some functional or anatomic testing by optometrists, the best measures of GDx, HRT and OCT would miss about 60 cases out of the 200 patients with glaucoma, and would incorrectly refer 50 out of 800 patients without glaucoma. If prevalence were 5%, e.g. such as in people referred only because of family history of glaucoma, the corresponding figures would be 15 patients missed out of 50 with manifest glaucoma, avoiding referral of about 890 out of 950 non-glaucomatous people.Heterogeneity investigations found that sensitivity estimate was higher for studies with more severe glaucoma, expressed as worse average mean deviation (MD): 0.79 (0.74 to 0.83) for MD < -6 db versus 0.64 (0.60 to 0.69) for MD ≥ -6 db, at a similar summary specificity (0.93, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.94 and, respectively, 0.94; 95% CI 0.93 to 0.95; P < 0.0001 for the difference in relative DOR).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The accuracy of imaging tests for detecting manifest glaucoma was variable across studies, but overall similar for different devices. Accuracy may have been overestimated due to the case-control design, which is a serious limitation of the current evidence base.We recommend that further diagnostic accuracy studies are carried out on patients selected consecutively at a defined step of the clinical pathway, providing a description of risk factors leading to referral and bearing in mind the consequences of false positives and false negatives in the setting in which the diagnostic question is made. Future research should report accuracy for each threshold of these continuous measures, or publish raw data.
Topics: Diagnostic Errors; Glaucoma; Humans; Nerve Fibers; Odds Ratio; Ophthalmoscopy; Optic Disk; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Scanning Laser Polarimetry; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Visual Field Tests
PubMed: 26618332
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008803.pub2 -
Ophthalmology Oct 2005To estimate the risk of malignant transformation of a choroidal nevus in the white population. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To estimate the risk of malignant transformation of a choroidal nevus in the white population.
DESIGN
Systematic literature review.
METHODS
A literature review was performed to obtain data on the prevalence of choroidal nevi in the white population. Data from studies that used indirect ophthalmoscopy or otherwise corrected data to include the entire fundus were selected. Only studies reporting on the United States population were included. The number of affected individuals was estimated using 2000 U.S. census data. The estimate of annual incident choroidal melanoma cases in the corresponding age- and race-matched population was calculated using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database (1973-2000). Average annual age-specific incidence rates for 1973 to 2000 for each of the 5-year age groups (adjusted for the U.S. 2000 population) were calculated and applied to the corresponding census data. The ratio of numbers of affected individuals with choroidal melanoma and choroidal nevi gave the annual rate of malignant transformation of a choroidal nevus.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Annual rate of malignant transformation of a choroidal nevus in the white population of the U.S.
RESULTS
The prevalence of choroidal nevus in the white U.S. population ranged from 4.6% to 7.9%. It was estimated that, on average, 8864625 individuals in the U.S. had a choroidal nevus. The number of individuals with choroidal melanoma in the corresponding age- and race-matched population ranged from 989 to 1008 (mean, 1002). The annual rate of malignant transformation of a choroidal nevus was estimated to be 1 in 8845.
CONCLUSIONS
If it is assumed that all choroidal melanomas arise from preexisting nevi, then the published data suggest a low rate (1/8845) of malignant transformation of a choroidal nevus in the U.S. white population.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Choroid Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Nevus, Pigmented; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Sex Distribution; United States; White People
PubMed: 16154197
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.06.011 -
JAMA Ophthalmology Jan 2021Red reflex testing is a simple and inexpensive method implemented in many countries as an important part of infant screening for ocular pathologies. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Red reflex testing is a simple and inexpensive method implemented in many countries as an important part of infant screening for ocular pathologies.
OBJECTIVES
To review the literature on the diagnostic accuracy of the red reflex test in infant screening for ocular pathologies and to perform meta-analyses to provide summary estimates.
DATA SOURCES
The following literature databases were searched for English-language, peer-reviewed literature, published until April 19, 2020: Cochrane Central, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents Connect, Data Citation Index, Derwent Innovations Index, KCI-Korean Journal Database, Russian Science Citation Index, SciELO Citation Index, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and ClinicalTrials.gov.
STUDY SELECTION
Eligibility criteria were defined according to population (studies of consecutively screened infants), exposure (red reflex or Brückner test as the index test), comparator (any ophthalmological examination), and study type (any study with diagnostic test accuracy data).
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines were followed. Data were extracted independently by 2 authors. For summary estimates of diagnostic test accuracy, the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics curve was used. Prevalence of ocular pathologies was introduced for a prevalence meta-analysis, which was then used in calculations of diagnostic accuracy of the red reflex test when applied in infant screening.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
True-positive, false-positive, true-negative, and false-negative findings; sensitivity; specificity; and positive and negative predictive values.
RESULTS
In this meta-analysis, 8713 unique infants from 5 unique studies were eligible for qualitative and quantitative review. All studies used the red reflex test without pupillary dilation and were compared with a reference test performed with pupillary dilation. For any ocular pathology, an estimated sensitivity of 7.5% (95% CI, 7.4%-7.5%) and specificity of 97.5% (95% CI, 97.5%-97.5%) was found. Focusing on ocular pathologies that required a medical or surgical intervention, sensitivity improved to 17.5% (95% CI, 0.8%-84.8%) and specificity remained high at 97.6% (95% CI, 87.7%-99.6%).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
These findings suggest that an abnormal red reflex finding most likely reflects an underlying ocular pathology. However, a normal red reflex finding during screening does not exclude ocular disease.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Neonatal Screening; Ophthalmoscopes; Ophthalmoscopy; Predictive Value of Tests; Refraction, Ocular; Refractive Errors; Reproducibility of Results; Vision Screening; Vision, Ocular
PubMed: 33180103
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.4854 -
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Jul 2005To evaluate the additional value of funduscopy in the routine management of patients with hypertension. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the additional value of funduscopy in the routine management of patients with hypertension.
DESIGN
Systematic review.
PARTICIPANTS
Adults aged 19 or more with hypertensive retinopathy.
DATA SOURCES
Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from 1990.
REVIEW METHODS
Studies were included that assessed hypertensive retinopathy with blinding for blood pressure and cardiovascular risk factors. Studies on observer agreement had to be assessed by two or more observers and expressed as a kappa statistic. Studies on the association between hypertensive retinopathy and hypertensive organ damage were carried out in patients with hypertension. The association between hypertensive retinopathy and cardiovascular risk was carried out in unselected normotensive and hypertensive people without diabetes mellitus.
RESULTS
The assessment of microvascular changes in the retina is limited by large variation between observers. The positive and negative predictive values for the association between hypertensive retinopathy and blood pressure were low (47% to 72% and 32% to 67%, respectively). Associations between retinal microvascular changes and cardiovascular risk were inconsistent, except for retinopathy and stroke. The increased risk of stroke, however, was also present in normotensive people with retinopathy. These studies did not adjust for other indicators of hypertensive organ damage.
CONCLUSION
Evidence is lacking that routine funduscopy is of additional value in the management of hypertensive patients.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diagnostic Tests, Routine; Humans; Hypertension; Microcirculation; Middle Aged; Observer Variation; Ophthalmoscopy; Retinal Diseases; Retinal Vessels; Risk Factors
PubMed: 16002881
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.331.7508.73 -
Journal of Vitreoretinal Diseases 2024To examine the outcomes of chandelier endoillumination-assisted scleral buckling (chandelier scleral buckling) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) and compare...
To examine the outcomes of chandelier endoillumination-assisted scleral buckling (chandelier scleral buckling) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) and compare them with those of standard scleral buckling using indirect ophthalmoscopy. A literature search was performed on April 15, 2023. Outcomes analyzed included the primary anatomic success rates, surgical duration, and complication rates. A meta-analysis of proportions estimated the pooled success rate of chandelier scleral buckling. In addition, meta-analyses compared the success rates between pseudophakic eyes and phakic eyes having chandelier scleral buckling and compared success rates and surgical duration between standard scleral buckling and chandelier scleral buckling. Thirty studies with 1133 eyes were included. The pooled primary anatomic success rate of chandelier scleral buckling was 91.7% (95% CI, 89.6%-93.6%). In studies comparing success rates between the 2 techniques, there was no significant difference (risk ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94-1.08; = .80). The surgical times were significantly shorter with chandelier scleral buckling than with standard scleral buckling (mean difference, -18.83; 95% CI, -30.88 to -6.79; = .002). There was no significant difference in the success rate between pseudophakic eyes and phakic eyes (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.08; = .89). No cases of endophthalmitis were reported. Chandelier endoillumination-assisted scleral buckling may be a promising technique given its high rate of primary anatomic success for RRDs and success rates similar to those of standard scleral buckling. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of chandelier scleral buckling between pseudophakic eyes and phakic eyes.
PubMed: 38465358
DOI: 10.1177/24741264231224956 -
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) Oct 2019To reclassify fundus autofluorescence (FAF) patterns around geographic atrophy (GA) based on GA progression rates. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To reclassify fundus autofluorescence (FAF) patterns around geographic atrophy (GA) based on GA progression rates.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, and PubMed were searched for studies reporting GA progression rates among different FAF patterns, such as "None," "Focal," "Banded," "Patchy," "Diffuse Nontrickling," and "Diffuse Trickling." The GA radius growth rate among different FAF patterns was compared, and a GA growth function for each group was derived. To account for the patients' different entry times, a horizontal translation factor was introduced to shift each data subset from "time after enrollment" to "duration of GA."
RESULTS
Seven studies with 496 eyes were included. Based on GA radius growth rates, the six FAF patterns were clustered into four groups with a high correlation coefficient within each group: Group 1, None, 0.061 mm/year (r = 0.996), Group 2, Focal, 0.105 mm/year (r = 0.987), Group 3, Banded, Patchy, and Diffuse Nontrickling, 0.149 mm/year (r = 0.993), and Group 4, "Diffuse Trickling, 0.245 mm/year (r = 0.997).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis suggested that the six FAF patterns can be coalesced into four groups based on lesion progression rates. Simplification of the reclassified FAF patterns may shed light on the GA natural history and assist in the design of clinical trials.
Topics: Disease Progression; Fluorescein Angiography; Fundus Oculi; Geographic Atrophy; Humans; Ophthalmoscopy; Retina
PubMed: 30829988
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002480 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2011Screening examinations for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are performed routinely in the neonatal intensive care unit and are a recognised cause of pain in the newborn. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Screening examinations for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are performed routinely in the neonatal intensive care unit and are a recognised cause of pain in the newborn.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the effect of instillation of topical anaesthetic eye drops compared with placebo or no treatment on pain in infants undergoing ROP screening.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. This included a search of the Cochrane Neonatal Group register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 10, 2010). We identified relevant studies by searching the following: (1) computerised bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (1966 to October 2010), EMBASE (1988 to October 2010) and Web of Science (1975 to March 2010; (2) the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials. We searched electronically abstracts from PAS from 2000 to 2010 and handsearched abstracts from ESPR from 2000 to 2009.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised, or quasi-randomised controlled trials, or randomised cross-over trials.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified two studies for inclusion. Both studies were randomised cross-over trials performed in single centres. Both studies used the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score as a measure of pain response. Different methods of evaluating PIPP scores are presented including the absolute PIPP score, a PIPP score > 10 or > 12 and an increase in PIPP ≥ 4 from the baseline value. There is a nonsignificant reduction in pain scores at one minute and a nonsignificant increase at five minutes post insertion of the speculum. PIPP score > 12 at one minute resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the number of patients who experienced pain (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.56, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.89; typical risk difference (RD) -0.23, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.86; number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 4). When pain was defined as an increase in PIPP > 4 there was a statistically significant reduction in the absolute number of patients who experienced pain at one minute (typical RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.94; typical RD -0.19, 95% CI -0.34 to -0.04; NNTB 5.3).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The administration of topical proparacaine 30 seconds prior to the ophthalmological evaluation was associated with a reduction in pain scores especially at the time of speculum insertion. However, despite treatment, screening remains a painful procedure and the role of nonpharmacological and pharmacological intervention including different local anaesthetic agents should be ascertained in future randomised trials.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Eye Pain; Humans; Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Ophthalmic Solutions; Ophthalmoscopy; Pain Measurement; Propoxycaine; Retinopathy of Prematurity
PubMed: 21901708
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007645.pub2