-
Obesity Surgery May 2021Predisposing factors of new-onset orthostatic intolerance (OI) after bariatric surgery (BS) are unknown. The purpose of this study is to summarize current existing data... (Review)
Review
Predisposing factors of new-onset orthostatic intolerance (OI) after bariatric surgery (BS) are unknown. The purpose of this study is to summarize current existing data on new-onset OI after BS. Materials and methods were considered for a search of articles that were published by the 30 of July 2020. A systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and in line with the protocol agreed by all authors was conducted. Of the 604 initially identified articles, four studies were found to match the established criteria and were extracted for eligibility. 83.3% were female. Hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome were the most frequently reported comorbidities. Surgical intervention such as revision, conversion, or reversal was not documented in these studies. Awareness of this issue must be raised due to the possibility of reduced quality of life and the risk of syncope.
Topics: Bariatric Surgery; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Male; Obesity, Morbid; Orthostatic Intolerance; Quality of Life
PubMed: 33655427
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05266-4 -
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) Jul 2020Controversies persist regarding the association between blood pressure (BP) and the risks of cognitive impairment and dementia due to inconsistent definitions of BP... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Controversies persist regarding the association between blood pressure (BP) and the risks of cognitive impairment and dementia due to inconsistent definitions of BP exposure and varying population characteristics. Here, we searched PubMed and performed a meta-analysis of the influence of BP exposure on the risks of cognitive disorders in prospective studies. Dose-response analyses were performed to illustrate the existence of linear/nonlinear relationships. The credibility of each meta-analysis was evaluated according to the risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Of the 31 628 citations, 209 were included in our systematic review, among which 136 were eligible for the meta-analysis. Overall, stronger associations were found in midlife than late-life. Moderate-quality evidence indicated that midlife hypertension was related to a 1.19- to 1.55-fold excess risk of cognitive disorders. Dose-response analyses of 5 studies indicated that midlife systolic BP >130 mm Hg was associated with an increased risk of cognitive disorders. With regard to BP exposure in late-life, high systolic BP, low diastolic BP, excessive BP variability, and orthostatic hypotension were all associated with an increased dementia risk. Encouragingly, the use of antihypertensive medications exhibited a 21% reduction in dementia risk. The U-shaped dose-response curve indicated that the protective window of diastolic BP level was between 90 and 100 mm Hg for low risk of Alzheimer disease. The relationships between BP variables and cognitive disorders are age- and BP type-dependent. Antihypertensive medications were associated with a reduced risk of dementia. However, the optimal dose, duration, and type for preventing cognitive disorders warrant further investigation.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Alzheimer Disease; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Causality; Cognition Disorders; Comorbidity; Dementia; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypertension; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Least-Squares Analysis; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Risk
PubMed: 32450739
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14993 -
Journal of Hypertension Oct 2016The systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the efficacy and safety of droxidopa in the treatment of orthostatic hypotension, following its recent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the efficacy and safety of droxidopa in the treatment of orthostatic hypotension, following its recent approvals in the United States.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Web of Science, ProQuest, and the WHO Clinical Trials Registry were searched. Studies were included if they randomized adults with orthostatic hypotension to droxidopa or to control, and outcomes related to symptoms, daily activity, blood pressure, or adverse events. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias was judged against the Cochrane risk of bias tool and quality of evidence measured using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. A fixed-effects model was used for pooled analysis.
RESULTS
Of 224 identified records, four studies met eligibility, with a pooled sample size of 494. Study duration was between 1 and 8 weeks. Droxidopa was effective at reducing dizziness [mean difference -0.97 (95% confidence interval -1.51, -0.42)], overall symptoms [-0.52 (-0.98, -0.06)] and difficulty with activity [-0.86 (-1.34, -0.38)]. Droxidopa was also effective at improving standing SBP [3.9 (0.1, 7.69)]. Rates of adverse events were similar between droxidopa and control groups, including supine hypertension [odds ratio 1.93 (0.87, 4.25)].
CONCLUSION
Droxidopa is well tolerated and effective at reducing the symptoms associated with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension without increasing the risk of supine hypertension.
REGISTRATION
PROSPERO ID CRD42015024612.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Blood Pressure; Droxidopa; Humans; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Posture; Registries
PubMed: 27442791
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001043 -
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and... Sep 2022Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is multifactorial in Parkinson's disease (PD). Antiparkinsonian medication can contribute to OH, leading to increased risk of falls,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is multifactorial in Parkinson's disease (PD). Antiparkinsonian medication can contribute to OH, leading to increased risk of falls, weakness and fatigue.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of antiparkinsonian drugs associated with OH as an adverse effect, compared to placebo. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases until November 2020. Analysis used fixed-effects models and the GRADE tool to rate quality of evidence. Meta-analysis was performed if 3 or more studies of a drug group were available.
RESULTS
Twenty-one RCTs including 3783 patients were included comparing 6 PD drug groups to placebo (MAO-B inhibitors, dopamine agonists, levodopa, COMT inhibitors, levodopa and adenosine receptor antagonists). OH was recorded as an adverse event or measurement of vital signs, without further specification on how this was defined or operationalised. Meta-analysis was performed for MAO-B inhibitors and dopamine agonists, as there were 3 or more studies for these drug groups. In this analysis, compared with placebo, neither MAO-B inhibitors or dopamine agonists were associated with increased risk of OH, (OR 2.28 [95% CI:0.81-6.46]), (OR 1.39 [95% CI:0.97-1.98]).
CONCLUSIONS
Most studies did not specifically report OH, or reporting of OH was limited, including how and when it was measured. Furthermore, studies specifically reporting OH included participants that were younger than typical PD populations without multimorbidity. Future trials should address this, for example,, by including individuals over the age of 75, to improve estimations of how antiparkinsonian medications affect risk of OH.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Levodopa; Monoamine Oxidase; Parkinson Disease
PubMed: 34964392
DOI: 10.1177/08919887211060017 -
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research May 2022Over the latest years different studies have investigated the possible relationship between D deficiency and occurrence of orthostatic hypotension (OH), often reaching... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Over the latest years different studies have investigated the possible relationship between D deficiency and occurrence of orthostatic hypotension (OH), often reaching controversial results. We perform an update meta-analysis providing an update overview on the association between hypovitaminosis D and orthostatic hypotension (OH) in older adults.
METHODS
Data extraction was independently performed by two authors and based upon predefined criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity between groups was measured using the Higgins I2 statistic.
RESULTS
Eight investigations enrolling 16.326 patients (mean age 75.5 years) met the inclusion criteria and were considered for the analysis. Patients with vitamin D deficiency were more likely to have OH compared to those without (OR: 1.36, 95% CI 1.14-1.63, p = 0.0001, I2 = 43.6%). A further sub-analysis, based on three studies, estimating the risk of OH in patients with hypovitaminosis D receiving antihypertensive treatment, did not reach the statistical significance (OR: 1.40, 95% CI 0.61-3.18, p = 0.418, I2 = 53.3%). Meta-regression performed using age (p = 0.12), BMI (p = 0.73) and gender (p = 0.62) as moderators did not reveal any statistical significance in influencing OH. Conversely, physical activity, Vitamin D supplementation and use of radioimmunoassay for the measurement of vitamin D serum levels showed a significant inverse relationship towards the risk of OH (Coeff.-0.09, p = 0.002, Coeff. - 0.12, p < 0.001 and Coeff. - 0.08, p = 0.03, respectively) among patients with hypovitaminosis D. A direct correlation between the administration of antihypertensive treatment and the risk of OH in older patients with low vitamin D level was observed (Coeff. 0.05, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Hypovitaminosis D is significantly associated with OH in older adults and directly influence by the administration of antihypertensive drugs. Conversely, physical activity, vitamin D supplementation and use of radioimmunoassay as analytic method inversely correlated with the risk of OH in older patients.
Topics: Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Humans; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency; Vitamins
PubMed: 34628636
DOI: 10.1007/s40520-021-01994-w -
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal :... Oct 2017Orthostatic intolerance is defined as the provocation of symptoms upon standing, commonly caused by neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (OH) and postural tachycardia... (Review)
Review
Orthostatic intolerance is defined as the provocation of symptoms upon standing, commonly caused by neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (OH) and postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), the etiology for which has not been fully uncovered yet. Many reports have described the occurrence of dysautonomia, orthostatic intolerance and POTS following febrile illness, presumably viral and post-vaccine. Furthermore, patients with dysautonomia have higher rates of autoimmune disorders such as Hashimoto thyroiditis and SLE. Recent evidence has shown the presence of adrenergic and cholinergic receptor antibodies in patients with POTS and orthostatic hypotension. In patients with cholinergic receptor antibodies, higher titers correlate with the disease severity. Few reports have shown that immunomodulation therapy resulted in significant improvement in symptoms. In this article, we review the available literature correlating autoimmunity with orthostatic intolerance syndromes. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the prevalence of such antibodies and examine different treatment modalities in this sub group of patients.
Topics: Animals; Autoantibodies; Autoimmunity; Blood Pressure; Humans; Orthostatic Intolerance; Posture; Receptors, Adrenergic; Receptors, Cholinergic; Risk Factors
PubMed: 28738696
DOI: 10.1080/14017431.2017.1355068 -
Journal of General Internal Medicine Nov 2013To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of midodrine in orthostatic hypotension (OH). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of midodrine in orthostatic hypotension (OH).
METHODS
We searched major databases and related conference proceedings through June 30, 2012. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the outcome measures across studies.
RESULTS
Seven trials were included in the efficacy analysis (enrolling 325 patients, mean age 53 years) and two additional trials were included in the safety analysis. Compared to placebo, the mean change in systolic blood pressure was 4.9 mmHg (p = 0.65) and the mean change in mean arterial pressure from supine to standing was -1.7 mmHg (p = 0.45). The change in standing systolic blood pressure before and after giving midodrine was 21.5 mmHg (p < 0.001). A significant improvement was seen in patients' and investigators' global assessment symptoms scale (a mean difference of 0.70 [95 % CI 0.30-1.09; p < 0.001] and 0.80 [95 % CI 0.76-0.85; p < 0.001], respectively). There was a significant increase in risk of piloerection, scalp pruritis, urinary hesitancy/retention, supine hypertension and scalp paresthesia after giving midodrine. The quality of evidence was limited by imprecision, heterogeneity and increased risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
There is insufficient and low quality evidence to support the use of midodrine for OH.
Topics: Blood Pressure; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Midodrine; Vasoconstrictor Agents
PubMed: 23775146
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2520-3 -
Neurology Sep 2014Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension (SOH) and recurrent reflex syncope (RRS) can be disabling. Midodrine has been proposed in the management of patients with these... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension (SOH) and recurrent reflex syncope (RRS) can be disabling. Midodrine has been proposed in the management of patients with these conditions but its impact on patient important outcomes remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of midodrine in patients with SOH and RRS.
METHODS
We searched multiple electronic databases without language restriction from their inception to June 2013. We included randomized controlled trials of patients with SOH or RRS that compared treatment with midodrine against a control and reported data on patient important outcomes. We graded the quality of evidence according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.
RESULTS
Eleven trials involving 593 patients were included in this review. Three studies addressed health-related quality of life in patients with RRS, showing improvement with midodrine: risk difference 14% (95% confidence interval [CI] -3.5 to 31.6), very low confidence. Seven studies addressed symptom improvement and provided poolable data showing improvement with midodrine in patients with SOH: risk difference 32.8% (95% CI 13.5-48), low confidence; and RRS: risk difference 63.3% (95% CI 47.6-68.2), very low confidence. Five studies reported syncope recurrence in patients with RRS showing improvement with midodrine: risk difference 37% (95% CI 20.8%-47.4%), moderate confidence. The most frequent side effects in the midodrine arm were pilomotor reactions (33.6%, risk ratio 4.58 [95% CI 2.03-10.37]).
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence warranting low/moderate confidence suggests that midodrine improves clinical important outcomes in patients with SOH and RRS.
Topics: Humans; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Midodrine; Quality of Life; Reflex; Secondary Prevention; Syncope
PubMed: 25150287
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000815 -
Maturitas Jul 2024The association between cognitive disorders and orthostatic hypotension (OH) has been empirically explored, but the results have been divergent, casting doubt on the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The association between cognitive disorders and orthostatic hypotension (OH) has been empirically explored, but the results have been divergent, casting doubt on the presence and direction of the association. The objective of this meta-analysis was to systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the association of OH and cognitive function, specifically mean score on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), cognitive impairment and incident dementia. A Medline search was conducted in May 2022 with no date limit, using the MeSH terms "orthostatic hypotension" OR "orthostatic intolerance" OR "hypotension" combined with the Mesh terms "cognitive dysfunction" OR "Alzheimer disease" OR "dementia" OR "cognition disorder" OR "neurocognitive disorder" OR "cognition" OR "neuropsychological test". Of the 746 selected studies, 15 longitudinal studies met the selection criteria, of which i) 5 studies were eligible for meta-analysis of mean MMSE score comparison, ii) 5 studies for the association of OH and cognitive impairment, and iii) 6 studies for the association between OH and incident dementia. The pooled effect size in fixed-effects meta-analysis was: i) -0.25 (-0.42; -0.07) for the mean MMSE score, which indicates that the MMSE score was lower for those with OH; ii) OR (95 % CI) = 1.278 (1.162; 1.405), P < 0.0001, indicating a 28 % greater risk of cognitive impairment for those with OH at baseline; and iii) HR (95 % CI) = 1.267 (1.156; 1.388), P < 0.0001, indicating a 27 % greater risk of incident dementia for those with OH at baseline. Patients with OH had a lower MMSE score and higher risk of cognitive impairment and incident dementia in this meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. This study confirmed the presence of an association between OH and cognitive disorders in older adults.
Topics: Humans; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Cognitive Dysfunction; Dementia; Longitudinal Studies; Mental Status and Dementia Tests
PubMed: 38604094
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.107866 -
Journal of Hypertension Jun 2016Orthostatic hypotension is a common condition among older adults and is associated with a range of deleterious outcomes. Recently, interest has developed in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Orthostatic hypotension is a common condition among older adults and is associated with a range of deleterious outcomes. Recently, interest has developed in hypovitaminosis D (defined as low 25 hydroxiyvitamin D levels) as a potential risk factor for orthostatic hypotension. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the association of orthostatic hypotension between study participants with and without hypovitaminosis D, including the adjustment of potential confounders (age, sex, BMI, renal function, comorbidities, seasonality, use of antihypertensive medications, and supplementation with cholecalciferol).
METHODS
A systematic literature search of major electronic databases from inception until 09/2015 was made for articles providing data on orthostatic hypotension and hypovitaminosis D. A random effects meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies investigating orthostatic hypotension prevalence comparing participants with vs. those without hypovitaminosis D was undertaken, calculating the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
Of 317 initial hits, five cross-sectional studies were meta-analysed including 3646 participants (1270 with hypovitaminosis D and 2376 without). The participants with hypovitaminosis D had a higher prevalence of orthostatic hypotension (OR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.25-2.84; I = 68%) that was not affected by adjusting for a median of five potential confounders (OR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.13-3.68; I = 73%). People with orthostatic hypotension had significantly reduced serum vitamin D concentrations (standardized mean difference = -0.42; 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.12). One longitudinal study confirmed the association between hypovitaminosis D and orthostatic hypotension.
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis highlights that hypovitaminosis D is associated with orthostatic hypotension, independent of potential confounders. Further longitudinal studies and clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Hypotension, Orthostatic; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency
PubMed: 27027426
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000907