-
PloS One 2020We examined the data reported in the studies for comparison of osteopontin (OPN) levels in tuberculosis and healthy participants, and to discuss whether OPN could be... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
We examined the data reported in the studies for comparison of osteopontin (OPN) levels in tuberculosis and healthy participants, and to discuss whether OPN could be extended to disease diagnosis, severity assessment and therapeutic effect monitering.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang databases. The pooled risk estimates were shown in standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for OPN levels. The random effect model was used according to the test of heterogeneity among studies. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression models were performed to identify the possible sources of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
17 retrospective studies with 933 tuberculosis participants and 786 healthy controls were finally included in this article. In the primary meta-analysis, higher serum/plasma OPN levels were found in tuberculosis patients (SMD = 2.58, 95%CI = 2.09~3.08, P<0.001). Besides, pooled results from positive acid-fast bacilli (AFB) staining and imaging-severe tuberculosis group demonstrated higher OPN concentrations (SMD = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.58~1.21, P<0.001; SMD = 1.11, 95%CI = 0.90~1.33, P<0.001; respectively), and OPN levels decreased after two months of standard anti-tuberculosis therapy (SMD = 2.10, 95%CI = 1.36~2.85, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Elevated serum/plasma OPN levels may be associated with an increased risk of tuberculosis, while further well-designed studies are needed. Moreover, OPN could be considered as a potential biomarker for tuberculosis surveillance and severity assessment.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Osteopontin; Publication Bias; Publications; Severity of Illness Index; Sputum; Tuberculosis
PubMed: 33264357
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242702 -
PloS One 2015Osteopontin (OPN) plays an important role in many physiological and pathological processes (wound healing, inflammation, immune response, and tumorigenesis). This... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
Osteopontin (OPN) plays an important role in many physiological and pathological processes (wound healing, inflammation, immune response, and tumorigenesis). This meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic value of osteopontin in ovarian cancer.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Searches in Embase and PubMed were conducted, in order to identify eligible studies on osteopontin expression and its diagnostic value in ovarian cancer. The revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tool was applied to examine the quality of these studies and the overall osteopontin diagnostic accuracy in ovarian cancer was pooled using the bivariate model. The publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Deek's test. This search methodology resulted in 13 studies with a total of 839 ovarian cancer patients and 1439 controls in this meta-analysis. The overall osteopontin diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ovarian cancer were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.51-0.78) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78-0.93), respectively. The area under summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves (AUC) was 0.85 (95%CI, 0.81-0.88). There was no significant publication bias observed across the eligible studies. However, a major design deficiency of the eligible studies is the issue of subject selection bias.
CONCLUSIONS
Osteopontin could be a useful biomarker in diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Due to the design deficits of the eligible studies, a future study with a larger sample size and better design is needed to rigorously confirm the diagnostic potential of osteopontin in ovarian cancer.
Topics: Female; Humans; Osteopontin; Ovarian Neoplasms
PubMed: 25951060
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126444 -
PloS One 2018Identifying a reliable biomarker may accelerate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and lead to early management of the disease. Accumulating evidence suggest that... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Identifying a reliable biomarker may accelerate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and lead to early management of the disease. Accumulating evidence suggest that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral blood concentration of osteopontin (OPN) may have diagnostic and prognostic value in MS. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that measured peripheral blood and CSF levels of OPN in MS patients and controls to evaluate the diagnostic potential of this biomarker better. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases to find articles that measured OPN concentration in peripheral blood and CSF samples from MS patients up to October 19, 2016. Q statistic tests and the I2 index were applied for heterogeneity assessment. If the I2 index was less than 40%, the fixed-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Random-effects meta-analysis was chosen if the I2 value was greater than 40%. After removal of duplicates, 918 articles were identified, and 27 of them fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We included 22 eligible studies in the final meta-analysis. MS patients, in general, had considerably higher levels of OPN in their CSF and blood when compared to all types of controls (p<0.05). When the comparisons were made between different subtypes of MS patients and controls, the results pointed to significantly higher levels of OPN in CSF of MS subgroups (p<0.05). All subtypes of MS patients, except CIS patients, had increased blood levels of OPN compared to controls (p<0.05). In the second set of meta-analyses, we compared the peripheral blood and CSF concentrations of OPN between MS patient subtypes. CIS patients had significantly lower levels of OPN both in their peripheral blood and CSF compared to patients with progressive subtypes of MS (p<0.05). CSF concentration of OPN was significantly higher among RRMS patients compared to the CIS patients and SPMS patients (P<0.05). Finally, patients with active MS had significantly higher OPN levels in their CSF compared to patients with stable disease (P = 0.007). The result of this study confirms that increased levels of OPN exist in CSF and peripheral blood of MS patients and strengthens the evidence regarding the clinical utility of OPN as a promising and validated biomarker for MS.
Topics: Biomarkers; Case-Control Studies; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Osteopontin
PubMed: 29346446
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190252 -
Clinica Chimica Acta; International... Jun 2014Osteopontin has been viewed as a promising biomarker for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM); however, the conclusions of various studies on diagnostic accuracy of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Osteopontin has been viewed as a promising biomarker for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM); however, the conclusions of various studies on diagnostic accuracy of osteopontin have not been consistent. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of circulating osteopontin for MPM.
METHODS
Using appropriate key words, scientific literature that evaluated circulating levels of osteopontin for the diagnosis of MPM was retrieved from electronic databases. Only articles published in English till March 26, 2013 were included in this study. The quality of the studies was assessed using the revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tools. The random-effects models were applied for analysing the performance of pooled characteristics.
RESULTS
Six studies were included in the analysis. The overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.60-0.70) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85), respectively. The area under summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves (AUC) was 0.83. The diagnostic accuracy of serum and plasma osteopontin was comparable.
CONCLUSIONS
Osteopontin is an effective marker for MPM diagnosis. However, more studies with a larger sample size and better design are needed to rigorously assess the diagnostic power of osteopontin.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Osteopontin; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 24607327
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.02.024 -
British Journal of Cancer Mar 2017Radiological markers of treatment response and prognostication in malignant pleural mesothelioma have limitations due to the morphology of the disease. Serum or pleural... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Radiological markers of treatment response and prognostication in malignant pleural mesothelioma have limitations due to the morphology of the disease. Serum or pleural fluid biomarkers that could act as an adjunct to radiological assessment would be of significant value. The aim of this review was to collate and summarise the literature relating to this topic.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed on the databases Pubmed and EMBASE to identify relevant studies. Two independent researchers read the abstracts and used the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool to assess the quality of the evidence.
RESULTS
Forty-five studies were identified from the current literature. Twenty studies investigated the role of serum soluble mesothelin with majority suggesting that it has variable utility as a baseline test but when measured serially correlates with treatment response and prognosis. Several studies demonstrated that serum osteopontin correlated with survival at baseline. Other biomarkers have shown prognostic utility in individual studies but are yet to be reproduced in large cohort studies.
CONCLUSIONS
From the available literature no serum or pleural fluid biomarker was identified that could be recommended currently for routine clinical practice. However, a falling serum soluble mesothelin might correlate with treatment response and improved survival.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Humans; Mesothelioma; Pleural Neoplasms; Prognosis
PubMed: 28170372
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.22 -
Clinical Immunology (Orlando, Fla.) Jan 2023Osteoarthritis (OA) patients demonstrated higher Osteopontin (OPN) plasma, serum, and synovial fluid concentrations than healthy individuals. In the present study, we... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Osteoarthritis (OA) patients demonstrated higher Osteopontin (OPN) plasma, serum, and synovial fluid concentrations than healthy individuals. In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether OPN could be used as a diagnostic or prognostic marker for OA symptom/disease severity.
METHODS
Using Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that measured OPN levels in OA patients' plasma, serum, or synovial fluid. After setting the eligibility criteria, data extraction, and quality assessment of the identified studies, we performed statistical analysis using Revman 5.4 and Open Meta analyst.
RESULTS
OPN has been found to be associated with advanced knee joint damage in OA patients. In addition, higher expression of OPN is thought to be associated with disease progression. Nevertheless, further studies should examine the role of other markers of chronic bone damage, such as leptin and sclerostin. This systematic review and meta-analysis included 14 studies with a total of 776 cases and 530 controls. OPN was significantly elevated in osteoarthritis patients' plasma, serum, and synovial fluid samples, with significant heterogeneity between studies.
CONCLUSION
We recommend that OPN plasma and synovial fluid levels be measured as a diagnostic and prognostic marker to determine the severity of OA symptoms.
Topics: Humans; Osteopontin; Osteoarthritis; Synovial Fluid; Biomarkers; Bone and Bones
PubMed: 36403917
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2022.109187 -
Medicine Oct 2018The prognostic value of tissue and serum osteopontin (OPN) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain controversial. The aim of present meta-analysis was to evaluate the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The prognostic value of tissue and serum osteopontin (OPN) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain controversial. The aim of present meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognostic value of OPN in patients with HCC.
METHODS
Eligible studies were systematically searched by PubMed, EMBASE, and Google scholar. A meta-analysis of 12 studies included 2117 cases was performed to estimate the association between OPN level and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) in HCC patients. Subgroup analyses were also performed in the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
The pooled data of studies showed that high OPN level was significantly associated with poor OS (hazard ratios [HR] 1.84; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.54-2.20; P = .000) and DFS (HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.40-1.98; P = .000) in HCC. Furthermore, in subgroup analysis, high tissue based OPN by immunohistochemistry detection and serum-based OPN by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detection were both significantly associated with OS (tissue: HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.53-2.31; P < .0001; serum: HR 2.38; 95% CI 1.58-3.59; P < .0001). Simultaneously, we also found that OPN expression was positively associated with stage (odds ratios [OR] 5.68; 95% CI 3.443-7.758), tumor size (Size≤5 cm vs >5 cm; OR 2.001; 95% CI1.036-3.867).
CONCLUSION
The current evidence indicates that OPN could serve as a prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for HCC.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Disease-Free Survival; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Osteopontin; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 30412113
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012954 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Inflammatory processes are involved in the pathophysiology of both Alzheimer's disease (AD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) but their exact contribution to disease... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
Inflammatory processes are involved in the pathophysiology of both Alzheimer's disease (AD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) but their exact contribution to disease progression remains to be deciphered. Biomarkers are needed to define pathophysiological processes of these disorders, who may increasingly co-exist in the elderly generations of the future, due to the rising prevalence in both and ameliorated treatment options with improved life expectancy in MS. The purpose of this review was to provide a systematic overview of inflammatory biomarkers, as measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), that are associated with clinical disease progression. International peer-reviewed literature was screened using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Disease progression had to be measured using clinically validated tests representing baseline functional and/or cognitive status, the evolution of such clinical scores over time and/or the transitioning from one disease stage to a more severe stage. The quality of included studies was systematically evaluated using a set of questions for clinical, neurochemical and statistical characteristics of the study. A total of 84 papers were included (twenty-five for AD and 59 for MS). Elevated CSF levels of chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL-40) were associated with disease progression in both AD and MS. Osteopontin and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 were more specifically related to disease progression in AD, whereas the same was true for interleukin-1 beta, tumor necrosis factor alpha, C-X-C motif ligand 13, glial fibrillary acidic protein and IgG oligoclonal bands in MS. We observed a broad heterogeneity of studies with varying cohort characterization, non-disclosure of quality measures for neurochemical analyses and a lack of adequate longitudinal designs. Most of the retrieved biomarkers are related to innate immune system activity, which seems to be an important mediator of clinical disease progression in AD and MS. Overall study quality was limited and we have framed some recommendations for future biomarker research in this field.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021264741.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Alzheimer Disease; Biomarkers; Disease Progression; Multiple Sclerosis
PubMed: 37520580
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1162340 -
Cureus May 2024Osteosarcoma (OS), a primary malignant bone tumor, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and prognosis. It is a painful medical burden, and treating it is still a... (Review)
Review
Osteosarcoma (OS), a primary malignant bone tumor, poses significant challenges in diagnosis and prognosis. It is a painful medical burden, and treating it is still a difficult issue. Osteopontin (OPN), a multifunctional extracellular matrix protein, has emerged as a promising biomarker in this context. This systematic review explores the role of OPN as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in OS, highlighting its potential in enhancing early detection, monitoring disease progression, and predicting patient outcomes. Various studies have demonstrated elevated levels of OPN in OS patients, correlating with tumor aggressiveness, metastatic potential, and poor prognosis. In addition, OPN's involvement in tumor microenvironment regulation and metastatic processes underscores its clinical relevance as a biomarker. For this systematic review, comprehensive literature searches were conducted in the PubMed databases for research published between the database's establishment and November 11, 2022. Out of the nine studies that were available for analysis, a higher level of OPN in primary osteogenic sarcoma patients indicates a poorer prognosis and higher incidence of metastasis. OS has not shown commensurable progress with concerns to treatment approches and survical outcomes. However, the discovery of a biological marker that can predict metastasis and severity will be a groundbreaking development for advancements in OS diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, understanding the intricate interplay between OPN and OS pathogenesis holds promise for improving patient management and developing targeted therapeutic strategies.
PubMed: 38887353
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60544