-
International Journal of Oral and... Mar 2011This systematic review aims to identify and review the best available evidence to answer the clinical question 'What are the incidence and the factors influencing the... (Review)
Review
This systematic review aims to identify and review the best available evidence to answer the clinical question 'What are the incidence and the factors influencing the development of osteoradionecrosis after tooth extraction in irradiated patients?'. A systematic review of published articles on post-irradiation extraction was performed via electronic search of the Medline, Ovid, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Additional studies were identified by manual reference list search. Evaluation and critical appraisal were done in 3 stages by two independent reviewers and any disagreement was resolved by discussion with a third party. 19 articles were selected for the final analysis. The total incidence of osteoradionecrosis after tooth extraction in irradiated patients was 7%. When extractions were performed in conjunction with prophylactic hyperbaric oxygen, the incidence was 4% while extraction in conjunction with antibiotics gave an incidence of 6%. This systematic review found that while the incidence of osteoradionecrosis after post-irradiation tooth extractions is low, the extraction of mandibular teeth within the radiation field in patients who received a radiation dose higher than 60Gy represents the highest risk of developing osteoradionecrosis. Based on weak evidence, prophylactic hyperbaric oxygen is effective in reducing the risk of developing osteoradionecrosis after post-radiation extractions.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Hyperbaric Oxygenation; Jaw Diseases; Mandibular Diseases; Osteoradionecrosis; Radiotherapy Dosage; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Tooth Extraction; Tooth Socket
PubMed: 21115324
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.005 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2022Osteoradionecrosis of the hip is a serious complication of radiotherapy that is easily overlooked by physicians and patients in the early stages. There are relatively...
BACKGROUND
Osteoradionecrosis of the hip is a serious complication of radiotherapy that is easily overlooked by physicians and patients in the early stages. There are relatively few reports on this subject, so there is no clear scientific consensus for the pathogenesis, early diagnosis, and clinical treatment of hip osteoradionecrosis. In this paper, we report two cases of hip osteoradionecrosis and systematically review the related literature.
CASE PRESENTATION
We report two cases of hip osteoradionecrosis. One patient successfully underwent total hip arthroplasty in our hospital and recovered well postoperatively. Another patient although we offered a variety of surgical options for this patient, the patient was worried that the bone loss would lead to poor prosthesis fixation, resulting in prosthesis loosening and infection, and therefore ultimately refused surgical treatment.
CONCLUSION
With the development of radiological techniques, the incidence of hip osteoradionecrosis is decreasing year by year, but early diagnosis and rational treatment remain challenging. The effects of non-surgical treatment are limited. Early prevention, early detection, and early intervention are crucial to delay or prevent the emergence of more serious complications.
PubMed: 35402457
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.858929 -
Oral Oncology Jan 2024Head and neck cancer ranks as the seventh most common cancer worldwide. Proton therapy is widely used in head and neck cancer. Osteoradionecrosis(ORN) is currently a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Head and neck cancer ranks as the seventh most common cancer worldwide. Proton therapy is widely used in head and neck cancer. Osteoradionecrosis(ORN) is currently a commonly investigated side effect of proton therapy. A meta-analysis is needed to investigate this topic.
MATERIAL/METHODS
Two authors searched three databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library; the search period was from inception to June 2023. The search keyword was set to be ((("osteoradionecrosis") OR ("osteonecrosis")) AND ("proton")).
RESULTS
We initially collected 410 articles, and after article selections, 22 articles remained in our systematic reviews. Due to the overlapping of patient populations, 17 studies were finally included in our meta-analysis. The pooled grade 3 or more ORN rate is 0.01(95 % CI = 0.01-0.03). Subgroup analysis showed that IMPT didn't reduce grade 3 or more ORN compared with 3DCPT (p = 0.15).
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis showed that severe ORN rarely occurred in proton therapy for head and neck cancer patients.
Topics: Humans; Osteoradionecrosis; Proton Therapy; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38035508
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106649 -
The British Journal of Oral &... Jun 2021This systematic review aimed to examine whether the incidence of osteonecrosis differed between patients who have dental extractions before or after radiotherapy (RT).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This systematic review aimed to examine whether the incidence of osteonecrosis differed between patients who have dental extractions before or after radiotherapy (RT). The reported incidence of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaws following RT to the head and neck varies widely in the literature. Currently, for patients with head and neck cancer there are no universally accepted guidelines on the optimal timing of dental surgery relative to RT to minimise incident ORN. A literature review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) criteria. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, Evidence-Based Medicine, and Web of Science databases targeted literature published up to and including 10 April 2020. Two independent reviewers assessed studies for eligibility against inclusion criteria. An assessment of bias was conducted for each of the included studies and relevant data extracted. A meta-analysis was undertaken using the statistical methods described. Twenty-four of 708 studies were included. They were heterogeneous and included a wide variation of RT methods, head and neck malignancies, and comorbidities. While some concluded that the incidence of ORN was dependent on the timing of dental extractions in relation to RT, with regard to the risk of its development, others reported additional factors such as age, comorbidities, extent of surgical resection, and dose and field of radiation, as more important predictors than timing. In many there was consistent lack of detail around the timing of dental procedures in relation to the delivery of RT. From 21 studies including 36,294 patients, of whom 14,389 had extractions before RT, the pooled incidence of ORN was 5.5% (95% CI: 2.1% to 10.1%). Significant heterogeneity was found in Cochran's Q-test (p<0.001) and Higgins I=98.0%. From 21 studies including 37,805 patients, of whom 6030 had extractions after RT, the pooled incidence of ORN was 5.3% (95% CI: 2.9% to 8.2%). Significant heterogeneity was found in Cochran's Q-test (p<0.001) and Higgins I=80.0%. There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups (random-effects model Q=0.12, p=0.73). Large, longitudinal studies with a priori-specified methods are needed to identify, recruit, and prospectively follow patients with head and neck cancer for the onset of ORN after dental surgery. This will allow clinical guidelines to be established to assist clinicians to plan treatment when extractions are indicated in patients undergoing RT to the head and neck.
Topics: Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Incidence; Neck; Osteoradionecrosis; Tooth Extraction
PubMed: 33685773
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.10.006 -
Journal of the American Dental... Oct 2022The purpose of this systematic review was to examine whether dental intervention involving bone or soft-tissue manipulation preradiotherapy (pre-RT) is associated with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this systematic review was to examine whether dental intervention involving bone or soft-tissue manipulation preradiotherapy (pre-RT) is associated with lower rates of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).
TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED
The authors included relevant studies from MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library, including observational studies published from 2007 through 2021 and involving adults who underwent dental intervention pre-RT for HNC. Authors assessed evidence certainty by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled relative risk estimates and hazard ratios. When meta-analysis was not possible, study-level measures of association and narrative summaries of the evidence were reported.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies were included. From the pooled, unadjusted analysis, patients undergoing pre-RT extractions may have a 55% increased risk of experiencing ORNJ (relative risk, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.85 to 2.86; very low certainty); the unadjusted pooled hazard ratio was 3.19 (95% CI, 0.99 to 10.31; very low certainty), corresponding to a possible increased hazard of developing ORNJ (very low certainty). Findings for other pre-RT procedures manipulating bone or tissue relied on limited, observational studies with low or very low certainty evidence.
CONCLUSIONS
Mostly very low certainty evidence suggests that patients with HNC who need pre-RT dental intervention may have an increased risk of developing ORNJ compared with those who do not.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
Maintaining optimal oral health may help reduce the need for urgent pre-RT dental treatment, potentially reducing ORNJ risk and minimizing delay of oncologic treatment in patients with HNC.
Topics: Adult; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Incidence; Oral Health; Osteoradionecrosis; Proportional Hazards Models
PubMed: 35985883
DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2022.06.003 -
Supportive Care in Cancer : Official... Oct 2023To investigate the survival rate in implants placement in irradiated and non-irradiated bone in patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. We focused on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To investigate the survival rate in implants placement in irradiated and non-irradiated bone in patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. We focused on the consequences of the main complications, such as osteoradionecrosis and peri-implantitis.
METHODS
An electronic search conducted by PRISMA protocol was performed. Full texts were carefully assessed, and data were assimilated into a tabular form for discussion and consensus among the expert panel. The quality assessment and the risk of bias are verified by Joanna Briggs Institute checklist (JBI) and The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool.
RESULTS
A total of 452 records were identified in the based on our PICOs strategy and after screening, 19 articles were included in the descriptive analysis of the review. Totaling 473 implants placed in irradiated and non-irradiated bone, and 31.6% of the patients were over 60 years of age. 57.9%) performed implant placement in a period of 12 months or more after the ending of radiotherapy. Only 5 studies had a follow-up period longer than 5 years after implant placement, of which three were used for the meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis of 5-year survival rate, analysis of implants in irradiated bone was assessed; a random effect model was used and a weighted proportion (PP) of 93.13% (95% CI: 87.20-99.06; p < 0.001), and in the 5-year survival rate, analysis of implants in non-irradiated bone was analysed; a fixed effect model was used and a weighted proportion (PP) of 98.52% survival (95% CI: 97.56-99.48, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Survival rates of implants placed in irradiated bone are clinically satisfactory after a follow-up of 5 years, with a fewer percentage than in implants placed in non-irradiated bone after metanalyses performed.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Aged; Bone-Anchored Prosthesis; Head and Neck Neoplasms
PubMed: 37851170
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08088-5 -
Oral Diseases Feb 2024Jaw osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a complication in patients with previous head and neck radiotherapy. Its incidence increases with dental extractions. Hence, this review... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Jaw osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a complication in patients with previous head and neck radiotherapy. Its incidence increases with dental extractions. Hence, this review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive treatment modalities undertaken at the time of extraction in previous head and neck radiotherapy patients in preventing ORN.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted, where studies with data on ORN incidence after extraction with or without adjunctive interventions were included. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the pooled prevalence of ORN per intervention and the pooled odds ratio for incidence of ORN between interventions.
RESULTS
In total, 1520 patients in 29 studies were included. Interventions identified were hyperbaric oxygen (HBO), pentoxifylline-tocopherol (PENTO), antibiotics (ABX), platelet-rich fibrin and photobiomodulation. The pooled prevalence of ORN for HBO (4.6%), PENTO (3.4%) and ABX (3.8%) was significantly lower than the Control (17.6%). For studies with direct comparisons between groups, HBO had lower but not significant odds of developing ORN than the Control (OR 0.27) and ABX (OR 0.57).
CONCLUSIONS
HBO, PENTO and ABX may reduce the incidence of ORN compared to no intervention. Given that all three have similar incidences of ORN, ABX may be the most cost-effective and accessible adjunctive modality.
PubMed: 38396363
DOI: 10.1111/odi.14902 -
Oral Oncology May 2023The aim of the present systematic review (SR) is to summarize Machine Learning (ML) models currently used to predict head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment-related... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The aim of the present systematic review (SR) is to summarize Machine Learning (ML) models currently used to predict head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment-related toxicities, and to understand the impact of image biomarkers (IBMs) in prediction models (PMs). The present SR was conducted following the guidelines of the PRISMA 2022 and registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42020219304).
METHODS
The acronym PICOS was used to develop the focused review question (Can PMs accurately predict HNC treatment toxicities?) and the eligibility criteria. The inclusion criteria enrolled Prediction Model Studies (PMSs) with patient cohorts that were treated for HNC and developed toxicities. Electronic database search encompassed PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, LILACS, and Gray Literature (Google Scholar and ProQuest). Risk of Bias (RoB) was assessed through PROBAST and the results were synthesized based on the data format (with and without IBMs) to allow comparison.
RESULTS
A total of 28 studies and 4,713 patients were included. Xerostomia was the most frequently investigated toxicity (17; 60.71 %). Sixteen (57.14 %) studies reported using radiomics features in combination with clinical or dosimetrics/dosiomics for modelling. High RoB was identified in 23 studies. Meta-analysis (MA) showed an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82 for models with IBMs and 0.81 for models without IBMs (p value < 0.001), demonstrating no difference among IBM- and non-IBM-based models.
DISCUSSION
The development of a PM based on sample-specific features represents patient selection bias and may affect a model's performance. Heterogeneity of the studies as well as non-standardized metrics prevent proper comparison of studies, and the absence of an independent/external test does not allow the evaluation of the model's generalization ability.
CONCLUSION
IBM-featured PMs are not superior to PMs based on non-IBM predictors. The evidence was appraised as of low certainty.
Topics: Humans; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Biomarkers; Xerostomia; Machine Learning
PubMed: 37023561
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106386 -
Journal of Cranio-maxillo-facial... Dec 2015Osteoradionecrosis of the mandible is a devastating complication of radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Many cases present at a late stage, from months... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Osteoradionecrosis of the mandible is a devastating complication of radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Many cases present at a late stage, from months to years following completion of radiation therapy. When medical treatment fails, surgery may be required with a variety of free flaps available for microvascular reconstructive techniques.
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review of the literature investigating the outcomes of free flap reconstruction of the jaw in mandibular osteoradionecrosis and determine the failure rates of different flap tissue.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed using Medline (Ovid) Pubmed and Embase databases and Google Scholar. Primary outcome measures were flap failures and complications, with donor site complications representing the secondary outcome measure. Analysis of pooled outcomes was undertaken for different flaps.
RESULTS
333 articles were identified and 15 articles met the final inclusion criteria, detailing 368 primary free tissue flap transfers. There was a flap failure rate of 9.8%. There were 146 post-operative complications (39.7%), the most common being fistula formation (8.4%), hardware plate exposure (7.1%) and flap wound infections (6.5%).
CONCLUSION
The fibula is the workhorse free flap for reconstruction in mandibular osteoradionecrosis. Evidence to date is largely limited with the need for larger powered multi-institutional prospective studies to determine the ideal flap donor tissue and evaluate patient and treatment predictors of free flap outcomes in order to tailor the best patient-based surgical approach for mandibular osteoradionecrosis.
Topics: Cranial Irradiation; Free Tissue Flaps; Humans; Osteoradionecrosis; Prospective Studies; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26427619
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.006 -
International Journal of Oral and... Feb 2019Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaws remains among the most commonly encountered and challenging complications of radiotherapy to the head and neck. The purpose of this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaws remains among the most commonly encountered and challenging complications of radiotherapy to the head and neck. The purpose of this study was to provide a review of the medical management for ORN and evaluate the reported outcomes with the use of pentoxifylline and tocopherol (PENTO), by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis. The predictor variable was the use of PENTO in the treatment of ORN. The outcome variable was the proportion of full recovery or significant improvement not requiring further intervention. The likelihood function was used to combine the studies and estimate the proportion and standard deviation of each outcome by the maximum likelihood estimation. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. A total 211 patients were treated. One hundred twenty-six patients recovered fully or improved significantly not requiring further intervention. Sixty patients remained the same, 10 were lost to follow-up, and the disease progressed in 15. The current literature supports the use of PENTO in the treatment of ORN of the jaws. Additional well-designed prospective studies are needed in order to further validate the regimen that can then be employed in the treatment of ORN.
Topics: Antioxidants; Drug Combinations; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Jaw Diseases; Osteoradionecrosis; Pentoxifylline; Radiation-Protective Agents; Tocopherols
PubMed: 30205911
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.08.007