-
International Journal For Equity in... Nov 2021Preliminary evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic shows the presence of health disparities, especially in terms of morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Preliminary evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic shows the presence of health disparities, especially in terms of morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to systematically review the evidence on the association of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status (SES) with health outcomes and access to healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS
We retrieved published evidence from late December 2019 through March 1, 2021. The target population was the population of the countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. The exposures were defined as belonging to racial/ethnic minority groups and/or low SES. The primary outcomes of interest include (1) death from COVID-19, (2) COVID-19 incidence/infection, (3) COVID-19 hospitalization, (4) ICU admission, (5) need for mechanical ventilation, (6) confirmed diagnosis, and (7) access to testing. We systematically synthesized the findings from different studies and provided a narrative explanation of the results.
RESULTS
After removing the duplicate results and screening for relevant titles and abstracts, 77 studies were selected for full-text review. Finally, 52 studies were included in the review. The majority of the studies were from the United States (37 studies). Despite the significant incongruity among the studies, most of them showed that racial/ethnic minority groups had higher risks of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization, confirmed diagnosis, and death. Additionally, most of the studies cited factors such as low level of education, poverty, poor housing conditions, low household income, speaking in a language other than the national language in a country, and living in overcrowded households as risk factors of COVID-19 incidence/infection, death, and confirmed diagnosis. However, findings in terms of the association of lack of health insurance coverage and unemployment with the outcome measures as well as the association of requiring mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and access to testing for COVID-19 with race/ethnicity were limited and inconsistent.
CONCLUSION
It is evident that racial/ethnic minority groups and those from low SES are more vulnerable to COVID-19; therefore, public health policymakers, practitioners, and clinicians should be aware of these inequalities and strive to narrow the gap by focusing on vulnerable populations. This systematic review also revealed a major incongruity in the definition of the racial/ethnic minority groups and SES among the studies.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42020190105.
Topics: COVID-19; COVID-19 Testing; Ethnicity; Health Status Disparities; Humans; Minority Groups; Pandemics; SARS-CoV-2; Social Class; United States
PubMed: 34819081
DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01582-4 -
BMC Public Health May 2022Racism constitutes a barrier towards achieving equitable healthcare as documented in research showing unequal processes of delivering, accessing, and receiving... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Racism constitutes a barrier towards achieving equitable healthcare as documented in research showing unequal processes of delivering, accessing, and receiving healthcare across countries and healthcare indicators. This review summarizes studies examining how racism is discussed and produced in the process of delivering, accessing and receiving healthcare across various national contexts.
METHOD
The PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews were followed and databases were searched for peer reviewed empirical articles in English across national contexts. No starting date limitation was applied for this review. The end date was December 1, 2020. The review scoped 213 articles. The results were summarized, coded and thematically categorized in regards to the aim.
RESULTS
The review yielded the following categories: healthcare users' experiences of racism in healthcare; healthcare staff's experiences of racism; healthcare staff's racial attitudes and beliefs; effects of racism in healthcare on various treatment choices; healthcare staff's reflections on racism in healthcare and; antiracist training in healthcare. Racialized minorities experience inadequate healthcare and being dismissed in healthcare interactions. Experiences of racism are associated with lack of trust and delay in seeking healthcare. Racialized minority healthcare staff experience racism in their workplace from healthcare users and colleagues and lack of organizational support in managing racism. Research on healthcare staff's racial attitudes and beliefs demonstrate a range of negative stereotypes regarding racialized minority healthcare users who are viewed as difficult. Research on implicit racial bias illustrates that healthcare staff exhibit racial bias in favor of majority group. Healthcare staff's racial bias may influence medical decisions negatively. Studies examining healthcare staff's reflections on racism and antiracist training show that healthcare staff tend to construct healthcare as impartial and that healthcare staff do not readily discuss racism in their workplace.
CONCLUSIONS
The USA dominates the research. It is imperative that research covers other geo-political contexts. Research on racism in healthcare is mainly descriptive, atheoretical, uses racial categories uncritically and tends to ignore racialization processes making it difficult to conceptualize racism. Sociological research on racism could inform research on racism as it theoretically explains racism's structural embeddedness, which could aid in tackling racism to provide good quality care.
Topics: Delivery of Health Care; Health Facilities; Humans; Minority Groups; Racism; Trust
PubMed: 35578322
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13122-y -
BJOG : An International Journal of... Sep 2017Uterine fibroids (UFs) are the most common neoplasm affecting women that can cause significant morbidity and may adversely impact fertility.
BACKGROUND
Uterine fibroids (UFs) are the most common neoplasm affecting women that can cause significant morbidity and may adversely impact fertility.
OBJECTIVES
To examine UF epidemiology and to evaluate the relative strengths of putative risk factors.
SEARCH STRATEGY
MEDLINE and Embase were searched for studies published in English between January 1995 and April 2015.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Publications reporting relevant data from registries and other observational studies with over 1000 patients and single-centre studies with over 100 patients were selected.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data on UF incidence, prevalence and associated risk factors were extracted from 60 publications.
MAIN RESULTS
Wide ranges were reported in both UF incidence (217-3745 cases per 100 000 women-years) and prevalence (4.5-68.6%), depending on study populations and diagnostic methods. Black race was the only factor that was recurrently reported to increase UF risk, by two-threefold compared with white race. Eleven other factors affected UF risk to a magnitude similar to or greater than race. Age, premenopausal state, hypertension, family history, time since last birth, and food additive and soybean milk consumption increased UF risk; use of oral contraceptives or the injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, smoking in women with low body mass index and parity reduced UF risk.
CONCLUSIONS
We identified 12 risk factors that play an important role in UF epidemiology. The UF risk factor with the strongest evidence is black race. High-quality prospective observational data are needed to improve our understanding of UF epidemiology, and thus its aetiology and optimal management.
TWEETABLE ABSTRACT
Uterine fibroids occur in about 70% of women. Black race and 11 other factors affect uterine fibroid risk.
Topics: Adult; Black People; Female; Humans; Leiomyoma; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Registries; Risk Factors; Uterine Neoplasms; Young Adult
PubMed: 28296146
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14640 -
Annals of Internal Medicine Mar 2021Data suggest that the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) differ among U.S. racial/ethnic groups.
BACKGROUND
Data suggest that the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) differ among U.S. racial/ethnic groups.
PURPOSE
To evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection rates and COVID-19 outcomes, factors contributing to disparities, and interventions to reduce them.
DATA SOURCES
English-language articles in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus, searched from inception through 31 August 2020. Gray literature sources were searched through 2 November 2020.
STUDY SELECTION
Observational studies examining SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalizations, or deaths by race/ethnicity in U.S. settings.
DATA EXTRACTION
Single-reviewer abstraction confirmed by a second reviewer; independent dual-reviewer assessment of quality and strength of evidence.
DATA SYNTHESIS
37 mostly fair-quality cohort and cross-sectional studies, 15 mostly good-quality ecological studies, and data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and APM Research Lab were included. African American/Black and Hispanic populations experience disproportionately higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and COVID-19-related mortality compared with non-Hispanic White populations, but not higher case-fatality rates (mostly reported as in-hospital mortality) (moderate- to high-strength evidence). Asian populations experience similar outcomes to non-Hispanic White populations (low-strength evidence). Outcomes for other racial/ethnic groups have been insufficiently studied. Health care access and exposure factors may underlie the observed disparities more than susceptibility due to comorbid conditions (low-strength evidence).
LIMITATIONS
Selection bias, missing race/ethnicity data, and incomplete outcome assessments in cohort and cross-sectional studies must be considered. In addition, adjustment for key demographic covariates was lacking in ecological studies.
CONCLUSION
African American/Black and Hispanic populations experience disproportionately higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related mortality but similar rates of case fatality. Differences in health care access and exposure risk may be driving higher infection and mortality rates.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research & Development. (PROSPERO: CRD42020187078).
Topics: Black or African American; Asian; COVID-19; Health Services Accessibility; Health Status Disparities; Hispanic or Latino; Hospitalization; Humans; Pandemics; Risk Factors; SARS-CoV-2; White People
PubMed: 33253040
DOI: 10.7326/M20-6306 -
Sexually Transmitted Diseases May 2019Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common vaginal infection among women of reproductive age and is associated with important adverse health outcomes. Estimates of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common vaginal infection among women of reproductive age and is associated with important adverse health outcomes. Estimates of the burden of BV and associated costs are needed to inform research priorities.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of global BV prevalence among reproductive-aged women in the general population. We searched PubMed and Embase and used random effects models to estimate BV prevalence by global regions. We estimated the direct medical costs of treating symptomatic BV. Assuming a causal relationship, we also estimated the potential costs of BV-associated preterm births and human immunodeficiency virus cases in the United States.
RESULTS
General population prevalence of BV is high globally, ranging from 23% to 29% across regions (Europe and Central Asia, 23%; East Asia and Pacific, 24%; Latin America and Caribbean, 24%; Middle East and North Africa, 25%; sub-Saharan Africa, 25%; North America, 27%; South Asia, 29%). Within North America, black and Hispanic women have significantly higher (33% and 31%, respectively) prevalence compared with other racial groups (white, 23%; Asian, 11%; P < 0.01). The estimated annual global economic burden of treating symptomatic BV is US $4.8 (95% confidence interval, $3.7-$6.1) billion. The US economic burden of BV is nearly tripled when including costs of BV-associated preterm births and human immunodeficiency virus cases.
CONCLUSIONS
The BV prevalence is high globally, with a concomitant high economic burden and marked racial disparities in prevalence. Research to determine the etiology of BV and corresponding prevention and sustainable treatment strategies are urgently needed to reduce the burden of BV among women. Additionally, the exceptionally high cost of BV-associated sequelae highlights the need for research to understand potential causal linkages between BV and adverse health outcomes.
Topics: Female; Global Health; HIV Infections; Humans; Prevalence; Vaginosis, Bacterial
PubMed: 30624309
DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000972 -
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Sep 2021Persons from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups experience disparities in access to and quality of palliative and end-of-life care. (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Persons from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups experience disparities in access to and quality of palliative and end-of-life care.
OBJECTIVES
To summarize and evaluate existing palliative and end-of-life care interventions that aim to improve outcomes for racial and ethnic underrepresented populations in the United States.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of the literature in the English language from four databases through January 2020. Peer-reviewed studies that implemented interventions on palliative care, advance care planning, or end-of-life care were considered eligible. Data were extracted from 16 articles using pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality was appraised using the modified Downs and Black tool for assessing risk of bias in quantitative studies.
RESULTS
Five studies were randomized controlled trials, and the remainder were quasi-experiments. Six studies targeted Latino/Hispanic Americans, five African Americans, and five, Asian or Pacific Islander Americans. The two randomized control trials reviewed and rated "very high" quality, found educational interventions to have significant positive effects on advance care planning and advance directive completion and engagement for underrepresented racial or ethnic groups.
CONCLUSION
The effectiveness of advance care planning, end-of-life, and palliative care interventions in improving outcomes for underrepresented racial and ethnic populations remains uncertain. Randomized controlled trials and educational interventions indicate that interventions targeting underrepresented groups can have significant and positive effects on advance directives and/or advance care planning-related outcomes. More high-quality intervention studies that address racial and ethnic health disparities in palliative care are needed, particularly those that address systemic racism and other complex multilevel factors that influence disparities in health.
Topics: Advance Care Planning; Ethnicity; Hospice Care; Humans; Palliative Care; Terminal Care; United States
PubMed: 33984460
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.04.025 -
Kidney360 Aug 2023In 16 studies conducted abroad, IgA nephropathy incidence varied from 0.06 in South Africa to 4.2 per 100,000 in Japan. Globally, the incidence of IgA nephropathy seemed...
KEY POINTS
In 16 studies conducted abroad, IgA nephropathy incidence varied from 0.06 in South Africa to 4.2 per 100,000 in Japan. Globally, the incidence of IgA nephropathy seemed higher in Asians than in non-Asians and higher in male patients than in female patients. Five studies conducted in the United States found no consistent difference in incidence between Black patients and White patients.
BACKGROUND
The reported incidence of IgA nephropathy varies widely across studies and may vary on the basis of race/ethnicity. This study systematically reviewed the incidence of IgA nephropathy in the United States and other countries and explored variability on the basis of the racial/ethnic composition and other demographic characteristics of different populations.
METHODS
This was a systematic review. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they contained data collected from January 1, 1974, to December 31, 2021, and reported IgA nephropathy incidence at a population level (, cases of IgA nephropathy per 100,000 population).
RESULTS
Five US and 16 international studies were included; three of the US studies reported the race-specific incidence of IgA nephropathy. In the United States, the reported incidence of IgA nephropathy ranged from 0.39 per 100,000 in Tennessee to 1.4 per 100,000 in Minnesota; internationally, IgA nephropathy ranged from 0.06 per 100,000 in South Africa to 4.2 per 100,000 in Japan. Findings regarding the incidence of IgA nephropathy in the United States by race were inconsistent: One study found a higher incidence among White patients compared with Black patients, one study found a lower incidence in White patients, and one study found no difference. Globally, the incidence of IgA nephropathy seemed to be higher in Asian than in non-Asian populations and higher in male patients than in female patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Reported incidence of IgA nephropathy varies widely; there is no consensus regarding the relationship between race and IgA nephropathy. Incidence rates seemed to be higher in Asians than non-Asians and in male patients than female patients. We recommend that future studies should report IgA nephropathy incidence rates by race/ethnicity and account for the demographic characteristics of the background population.
Topics: Humans; Glomerulonephritis, IGA; Incidence; Racial Groups
PubMed: 37227924
DOI: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000165 -
BMC Public Health Jul 2021Racism is increasingly recognised as a significant health determinant that contributes to health inequalities. In Australia efforts have been made to bridge the...
BACKGROUND
Racism is increasingly recognised as a significant health determinant that contributes to health inequalities. In Australia efforts have been made to bridge the recognised health gap between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and other Australians. This systematic scoping review aimed to assess, synthesise, and analyse the evidence in Australia about the impacts of racism on the mental and physical health of Aboriginal and Torrens Strait Islander peoples.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted to locate Australian studies in English published between 2000 and 2020. Five electronic databases were used: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science and the Australia's National Institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research. The search strategy included a combination of key words related with racism, mental health, physical health and Indigenous people. Data were extracted based on review questions and findings were synthesized in a narrative summary.
RESULTS
Of total 338 searched studies from five databases, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria for narrative synthesis where eight were cross-sectional studies and four prospective cohorts. General mental health and general health perception were the most frequently studied outcomes followed by child behaviour, smoking and substance consumption and specific health conditions. The prevalence of racism varied between 6.9 and 97%. The most common health outcomes associated with racism were general poor mental health and poor general health perception. More specific health outcomes such as anxiety, depression, child behaviour, asthma, increased BMI and smoking were also associated with racism but were analysed by a limited number of studies. Three studies analysed psychological distress, negative mental health, sleeping difficulties and negative perceived mental health according to severity of exposition to racism.
CONCLUSION
Racism is associated with negative overall mental and negative general health outcomes among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Strategies to prevent all forms and sources of racism are necessary to move forward to bridging the health gap between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and non-Indigenous Australians. Further research is needed to understand in more detail the impact of racism from an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander definition of health and wellbeing.
Topics: Australia; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Mental Health; Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander; Prospective Studies; Racism
PubMed: 34217243
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11363-x -
Journal of Medical Internet Research Feb 2024There is a growing interest in developing scalable interventions, including internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT), to meet the increasing demand for mental... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is a growing interest in developing scalable interventions, including internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT), to meet the increasing demand for mental health services. Given the growth in diversity worldwide, it is essential that the clinical trials of iCBT for depression include diverse samples or, at least, report information on the race, ethnicity, or other background indicators of their samples. Unfortunately, the field lacks data on how well diversity is currently reported and represented in the iCBT literature.
OBJECTIVE
Thus, the main objective of this systematic review was to examine the overall reporting of racial and ethnic identities in published clinical trials of iCBT for depression. We also aimed to review the representation of specific racial and ethnic minoritized groups and the inclusion of alternative background indicators such as migration status or country of residence.
METHODS
Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials in which iCBT was compared to a waiting list, care-as-usual, active control, or another iCBT. The included papers also had to have a focus on acute treatment (eg, 4 weeks to 6 months) of depression, be delivered via the internet on a website or a smartphone app and use guided or unguided self-help. Studies were initially identified from the METAPSY database (n=59) and then extended to include papers up to 2022, with papers retrieved from Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane (n=3). Risk of bias assessment suggested that reported studies had at least some risk of bias due to use of self-report outcome measures.
RESULTS
A total of 62 iCBT randomized controlled trials representing 17,210 participants are summarized in this study. Out of those 62 papers, only 17 (27%) of the trials reported race, and only 12 (19%) reported ethnicity. Reporting outside of the United States was very poor, with the United States accounting for 15 (88%) out of 17 of studies that reported race and 9 (75%) out of 12 for ethnicity. Out of 3,623 participants whose race was reported in the systematic review, the racial category reported the most was White (n=2716, 74.9%), followed by Asian (n=209, 5.8%) and Black (n=274, 7.6%). Furthermore, only 25 (54%) out of the 46 papers conducted outside of the United States reported other background demographics.
CONCLUSIONS
It is important to note that the underreporting observed in this study does not necessarily indicate an underrepresentation in the actual study population. However, these findings highlight the poor reporting of race and ethnicity in iCBT trials for depression found in the literature. This lack of diversity reporting may have significant implications for the scalability of these interventions.
Topics: Humans; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Culture; Depression; Ethnicity; Internet; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Racial Groups
PubMed: 38300699
DOI: 10.2196/50780 -
British Journal of Psychology (London,... May 2023Two competing theories explain the other-'race' effect (ORE) either by greater perceptual expertise to same-'race' (SR) faces or by social categorization of other-'race'...
Two competing theories explain the other-'race' effect (ORE) either by greater perceptual expertise to same-'race' (SR) faces or by social categorization of other-'race' (OR) faces at the expense of individuation. To assess expertise and categorization contributions to the ORE, a promising-yet overlooked-approach is comparing activations for different other-'races'. We present a label-based systematic review of neuroimaging studies reporting increased activity in response to OR faces (African, Caucasian, or Asian) when compared with the SR of participants. Hypothetically, while common activations would reflect general aspects of OR perception, 'race'-preferential ones would represent effects of 'race'-specific visual appearance. We find that several studies report activation of occipito-temporal and midcingulate areas in response to faces across different other-'races', presumably due to high demand on the visual system and category processing. Another area reported in response to all OR faces, the caudate nucleus, suggests the involvement of socio-affective processes and behavioural regulation. Overall, our results support hybrid models-both expertise and social categorization contribute to the ORE, but they provide little evidence for reduced motivation to process OR faces. Additionally, we identify areas preferentially responding to specific OR faces, reflecting effects of visual appearance.
Topics: Humans; Asian People; Cognition; Facial Recognition; Neuroimaging; Pattern Recognition, Visual; Racial Groups; White; Black or African American; Social Behavior
PubMed: 36111613
DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12595