-
Pain Jun 2017Breathing techniques are commonly used to alleviate pain. Despite their frequent use, surprisingly little is known about their efficacy as well as their underlying... (Review)
Review
Breathing techniques are commonly used to alleviate pain. Despite their frequent use, surprisingly little is known about their efficacy as well as their underlying physiological mechanisms. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize and critically appraise the results of existing studies on the association between respiration and pain, and to highlight a potential physiological mechanism underlying the respiration-pain connection. A total of 31 publications from between 1984 and 2015 were retrieved and analyzed. These articles were classified into 4 groups: experimental and clinical studies of the effect of pain on respiration, clinical studies of the effects of breathing techniques on pain, and experimental studies of the influence of various forms of respiration on laboratory-induced pain. The findings suggest that pain influences respiration by increasing its flow, frequency, and volume. Furthermore, paced slow breathing is associated with pain reduction in some of the studies, but evidence elucidating the underlying physiological mechanisms of this effect is lacking. Here, we focus on the potential role of the cardiovascular system on the respiratory modulation of pain. Further research is definitely warranted.
Topics: Animals; Breathing Exercises; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Models, Biological; Pain Perception; Respiratory Mechanics; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28240995
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000865 -
International Journal of Environmental... Feb 2023In neonatology, neonates have traditionally been considered incapable of feeling pain, due to the immaturity of their nervous system. Currently, there is sufficient... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
In neonatology, neonates have traditionally been considered incapable of feeling pain, due to the immaturity of their nervous system. Currently, there is sufficient information on the perception of pain in neonates; however, this treatment at this crucial stage for development requires a better approach. For this reason, the aim of this study was to analyse the efficacy of non-pharmacological analgesia interventions during heel prick, and to assess their effects on heart rate (HR), premature infant pain profile (PIPP) and O saturation. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following the guidelines of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA), and the Cochrane collaboration handbook. The databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and Science Direct were searched until the end of January 2022. The DerSimonian and Laird methods were used to estimate the effect size with a 95% confidence interval (CI95%). Effect size estimates were 0.05 (95% CI: -0.19, 0.29) for HR, -0.02 (95% CI: -0.24, 0.21) for PIPP scale, and -0.12 (95% CI: -0.29, 0.05) for O saturation. The non-pharmacological interventions analysed (breastfeeding, kangaroo-mother care method, oral sucrose and non-nutritive sucking) were not statistically significant in reducing neonatal pain, but did influence the decrease in pain score and a faster stabilisation of vital signs.
Topics: Humans; Child; Punctures; Kangaroo-Mother Care Method; Pain; Pain Management; Heart Rate
PubMed: 36833919
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043226 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Apr 2022Endometriosis is a painful, chronic inflammatory disorder that is difficult to treat. Studies have suggested that diet may have a therapeutic effect on chronic... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Endometriosis is a painful, chronic inflammatory disorder that is difficult to treat. Studies have suggested that diet may have a therapeutic effect on chronic inflammation. However, only limited information is available regarding the impact of diet on pain perception in relation to endometriosis. As such, the aim of this review was to evaluate if diet has any impact on pain perception in women suffering from endometriosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review was conducted by searching Medline and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials and observational studies adhering to the PRISMA and SWiM guidelines. A table summarizing the findings was developed using the GRADE approach. Inclusion criteria were: women of reproductive age; laparoscopically confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis; and intervention including any type of dietary change. This review was registered with PROSPERO on 14 November 2020 (CRD42020212314).
RESULTS
In total, the database search identified 2185 studies; of these, six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Cochrane tool were used to assess the studies, which were concluded to be of high quality and to have low risk of bias. All studies had a positive impact on pain perception, with all except one study reporting a significant reduction in pain perception, indicating that high intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids, a gluten-free diet and a low nickel diet may improve painful endometriosis. It was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis due to considerable heterogeneity amongst the included studies due to differences in dietary adherence, dietary therapies, outcome measurements, populations, durations and study designs.
CONCLUSION
All studies found that diet had a positive impact on pain perception among women with endometriosis. However, the majority of available evidence on dietary interventions in relation to endometriosis-associated pain was derived from non-randomized controlled trials, which have multiple sources of bias. Therefore, further studies are needed to investigate diet and its effect on pain perception in women with endometriosis.
Topics: Diet; Endometriosis; Female; Humans; Pain; Pain Perception
PubMed: 35245715
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.02.028 -
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Apr 2022This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify and quantify the current available evidence of hypnosis efficacy to manage pain in patients with chronic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify and quantify the current available evidence of hypnosis efficacy to manage pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain. Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) with hypnosis and/or self-hypnosis treatment used to manage musculoskeletal and/or neuropathic chronic pain in adults and assessing pain intensity were included. Reviews, meta-analyses, non-randomized clinical trials, case reports and meeting abstracts were excluded. Five databases, up until May 13th 2021, were used to search for RCTs using hypnosis to manage chronic musculoskeletal and/or neuropathic pain. The protocol is registered on PROSPERO register (CRD42020180298) and no specific funding was received for this review. The risk of bias asessement was conducted according to the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized control trials (RoB 2.0). Nine eligible RCTs including a total of 530 participants were considered. The main analyses showed a moderate decrease in pain intensity (Hedge's g: -0.42; p = 0.025 after intervention, Hedge's g: -0.37; p = 0.027 after short-term follow-up) and pain interference (Hedge's g: -0.39; p = 0.029) following hypnosis compared to control interventions. A significant moderate to large effect size of hypnosis compared to controls was found for at 8 sessions or more (Hedge's g: -0.555; p = 0.034), compared to a small and not statistically significant effect for fewer than 8 sessions (Hedge's g: -0.299; p = 0.19). These findings suggest that a hypnosis treatment lasting a minimum of 8 sessions could offer an effective complementary approach to manage chronic musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain. Future research is needed to delineate the relevance of hypnosis in practice and its most efficient prescription.
Topics: Adult; Chronic Pain; Humans; Hypnosis; Neuralgia; Pain Measurement
PubMed: 35192910
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104591 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2021(1) Background: Rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy causes pain and functional limitation of the shoulder. Physical exercises are effective therapies but there is no... (Review)
Review
(1) Background: Rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy causes pain and functional limitation of the shoulder. Physical exercises are effective therapies but there is no consensus on which exercise programme is the most appropriate. Objective: To analyze and compare the effectiveness of different intervention modalities-based exclusively on physical exercise muscle-development programs to improve shoulder pain and function in RC tendinopathy. (2) Methods: Systematic review (PRISMA) through a search in PubMed, WOS, PEDro, Cinahl, Scopus and Dialnet. The PEDro Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias analyzed the methodological quality. A pre-established table collected data on: patients, interventions, outcome measures and results. A narrative synthesis of the results was conducted. (3) Results: eight articles were selected (Cochrane: ; PEDro: good quality). All assessed programs were effective. Only one study found statistically and clinically significant differences in favour of eccentric training. The exercises used were: eccentric/concentric/conventional, open/closed kinetic chain, with/without co-activation of glenohumeral muscle, with/without pain, and in clinic/at home. (4) Conclusions: All exercise programs were effective in RC tendinopathy, improving pain and shoulder function. No solid results were obtained when the interventions were compared due to their heterogeneity. Patients perception assessment tools were the most widely used. Amount of load applied should be considered.
PubMed: 33809604
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030529 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Sep 2021Endometriosis is challenging to treat. It is a painful and chronic inflammatory disorder that impacts up to 10% of women of reproductive age. Despite available surgical...
INTRODUCTION
Endometriosis is challenging to treat. It is a painful and chronic inflammatory disorder that impacts up to 10% of women of reproductive age. Despite available surgical and medical treatment options, recurrence of symptoms is common. Available studies suggest that exercise may have a therapeutic effect on chronic inflammation and thereby on pain perception. This review evaluates whether exercise can decrease pain perception in women with symptomatic endometriosis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA by searching databases Medline and Embase to locate randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Risk of bias was investigated using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool for the Evaluation of Randomized Controlled Trials and the ROBINS-I quality assessment scale. Inclusion criteria were women of reproductive age, laparoscopically confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis, and intervention of any type of exercise. All manuscripts were evaluated by two of the authors and when in doubt a third author was consulted. This review was registered in PROSPERO on November 14, 2020 (CRD42020212309).
RESULTS
Six articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Concerning exercise, two studies showed significant decrease in pain relief but the remaining studies showed either negative or no impact on pain relief. A meta-analysis could not be conducted because of the considerable heterogeneity among the included studies.
CONCLUSIONS
The present review does not indicate any beneficial effect of exercise on pain in women with endometriosis. There is a need for randomized controlled trials with correct power calculation, well-defined study groups and training programs to be able to answer the question of whether exercise can improve the pain experience in patients with endometriosis.
Topics: Endometriosis; Exercise Therapy; Female; Humans; Pain Perception; Pelvic Pain
PubMed: 33999412
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14169 -
Disability and Rehabilitation Dec 2020The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of immersive and non-immersive interactive virtual reality on pain perception in patients with a clinical...
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of immersive and non-immersive interactive virtual reality on pain perception in patients with a clinical pain condition. The following databases were searched from inception: Medline (Ovid), PsychInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane library and Web of Science. Two reviewers screened reports and extracted the data. A third reviewer acted as an arbiter. Studies were eligible if they were randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized trials, and uncontrolled trials. Crossover and parallel-group designs were included. Risk of bias was assessed for all included studies. Thirteen clinical studies were included. The majority of studies investigated a sample of participants with chronic pain. Six were controlled trials and seven uncontrolled studies. Findings from controlled research suggest that interactive virtual reality may reduce pain associated with ankylosing spondylitis and post-mastectomy, but results are inconsistent for patients with neck pain. Findings from uncontrolled studies suggest that interactive virtual reality may reduce neuropathic limb pain, and phantom limb pain, but had no effect on nonspecific chronic back pain. There is a need for more rigorous randomized control trials in order to conclude on the effectiveness of the use of virtual reality for the management of pain.Implications for rehabilitationInteractive virtual reality has been increasingly used in the rehabilitation of painful conditions.Interactive virtual reality using exergames may promote distraction from painful exercises and reduce pain post-mastectomy and in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.Interactive virtual representation of limbs may reduce neuropathic and phantom limb pain.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Exercise Therapy; Female; Humans; Mastectomy; Pain Perception; Virtual Reality
PubMed: 31067135
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1610803 -
Sports (Basel, Switzerland) May 2023A massage is a tool that is frequently used in sports and exercise in general for recovery and increased performance. In this review paper, we aimed to search and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
A massage is a tool that is frequently used in sports and exercise in general for recovery and increased performance. In this review paper, we aimed to search and systemize current literature findings relating to massages' effects on sports and exercise performance concerning its effects on motor abilities and neurophysiological and psychological mechanisms.
METHODS
The review has been written following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis) guidelines. One hundred and fourteen articles were included in this review.
RESULTS
The data revealed that massages, in general, do not affect motor abilities, except flexibility. However, several studies demonstrated that positive muscle force and strength changed 48 h after the massage was given. Concerning neurophysiological parameters, the massage did not change blood lactate clearance, muscle blood flow, muscle temperature, or activation. However, many studies indicate pain reduction and delayed onset muscle soreness, which are probably correlated with the reduction of the level of creatine kinase enzyme and psychological mechanisms. In addition, the massage treatment led to a decrease in depression, stress, anxiety, and the perception of fatigue and an increase in mood, relaxation, and the perception of recovery.
CONCLUSION
The direct usage of massages just for gaining results in sport and exercise performance seems questionable. However, it is indirectly connected to performance as an important tool when an athlete should stay focused and relaxed during competition or training and recover after them.
PubMed: 37368560
DOI: 10.3390/sports11060110 -
Reproductive Health May 2018A negative experience in childbirth is associated with chronic maternal morbidities. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify currently... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
A negative experience in childbirth is associated with chronic maternal morbidities. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify currently available successful interventions to create a positive perception of childbirth experience which can prevent psychological birth trauma.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials of interventions in pregnancy or labour which aimed to improve childbirth experience versus usual care were identified from 1994 to September 2016. Low risk pregnant or childbearing women were chosen as the study population. PEDRO scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool were used for quality assessment. Pooled effect estimates were calculated when more than two studies had similar intervention. If it was not possible to include a study in the meta-analysis, its data were summarized narratively.
RESULTS
After screening of 7832 titles/abstracts, 20 trials including 22,800 participants from 12 countries were included. Successful strategies to create a positive perception of childbirth experience were supporting women during birth (Risk Ratio = 1.35, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.07 to 1.71), intrapartum care with minimal intervention (Risk Ratio = 1.29, 95% Confidence Interval:1.15 to 1.45) and birth preparedness and readiness for complications (Mean Difference = 3.27, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.66 to 5.88). Most of the relaxation and pain relief strategies were not successful to create a positive birth experience (Mean Difference = - 2.64, 95% Confidence Intervention: - 6.80 to 1.52).
CONCLUSION
The most effective strategies to create a positive birth experience are supporting women during birth, intrapartum care with minimal intervention and birth preparedness. This study might be helpful in clinical approaches and designing future studies about prevention of the negative and traumatic birth experiences.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Labor, Obstetric; Pain Management; Parturition; Patient Satisfaction; Perception; Postpartum Period; Prenatal Care; Stress, Psychological
PubMed: 29720201
DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0511-x -
Medicine Jun 2022The ABCDE (Awakening and Breathing Coordination of daily sedation and ventilator removal trials, Delirium monitoring and management, and Early mobility and exercise) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The ABCDE (Awakening and Breathing Coordination of daily sedation and ventilator removal trials, Delirium monitoring and management, and Early mobility and exercise) and ABCDEF (Assessment, prevent and manage pain, Both spontaneous awakening and spontaneous breathing trials, Choice of analgesia and sedation, assess, prevent and manage Delirium, Early mobility and exercise, Family engagement) care bundles consist of small sets of evidence-based interventions and are part of the science behind Intensive Care Unit (ICU) liberation. This review sought to analyse the process of implementation of ABCDE and ABCDEF care bundles in ICUs, identifying barriers, facilitators and changes in perception and attitudes of healthcare professionals; and to estimate care bundle effectiveness and safety.
METHODS
We selected qualitative and quantitative studies addressing the implementation of ABCDE and ABCDEF bundles in the ICU, identified on MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO, Virtual Health Library and Open Grey, without restriction on language or date of publication, up to June 2018. The outcomes measured were ICU and hospital length of stay; mechanical ventilation time; incidence and prevalence of delirium or coma; level of agitation and sedation; early mobilization; mortality in ICU and hospital; change in perception, attitude or behaviour of the stakeholders; and change in knowledge of health professionals. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, performed data extraction, and assessed risk of bias and methodological quality. A meta-analysis of random effects was performed.
RESULTS
Twenty studies were included, 13 of which had a predominantly qualitative and 7 a quantitative design (31,604 participants). The implementation strategies were categorized according to the taxonomy developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group and eighty strategies were identified. The meta-analysis results showed that implementation of the bundles may reduce length of ICU stay, mechanical ventilation time, delirium, ICU and hospital mortality, and promoted early mobilization in critically-ill patients.
CONCLUSIONS
: This study can contribute to the planning and execution of the implementation process of ABCDE and ABCDEF care bundles in ICUs. However, the effectiveness and safety of these bundles need to be corroborated by further studies with greater methodological rigor.
PROTOCOL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42019121307.
Topics: Critical Care; Critical Illness; Delirium; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Patient Care Bundles
PubMed: 35758388
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029499