-
Annals of Surgical Oncology Jul 2023Pancreatic cancer often presents as locally advanced (LAPC) or borderline resectable (BRPC). Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is recommended as initial treatment. It is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Multi-institutional, Patient-Level, Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic cancer often presents as locally advanced (LAPC) or borderline resectable (BRPC). Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is recommended as initial treatment. It is currently unclear what chemotherapy should be preferred for patients with BRPC or LAPC.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and multi-institutional meta-analysis of patient-level data regarding the use of initial systemic therapy for BRPC and LAPC. Outcomes were reported separately for tumor entity and by chemotherapy regimen including FOLFIRINOX (FIO) or gemcitabine-based.
RESULTS
A total of 23 studies comprising 2930 patients were analyzed for overall survival (OS) calculated from the beginning of systemic treatment. OS for patients with BRPC was 22.0 months with FIO, 16.9 months with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Gem/nab), 21.6 months with gemcitabine/cisplatin or oxaliplatin or docetaxel or capecitabine (GemX), and 10 months with gemcitabine monotherapy (Gem-mono) (p < 0.0001). In patients with LAPC, OS also was higher with FIO (17.1 months) compared with Gem/nab (12.5 months), GemX (12.3 months), and Gem-mono (9.4 months; p < 0.0001). This difference was driven by the patients who did not undergo surgery, where FIO was superior to other regimens. The resection rates for patients with BRPC were 0.55 for gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and 0.53 with FIO. In patients with LAPC, resection rates were 0.19 with Gemcitabine and 0.28 with FIO. In resected patients, OS for patients with BRPC was 32.9 months with FIO and not different compared to Gem/nab, (28.6 months, p = 0.285), GemX (38.8 months, p = 0.1), or Gem-mono (23.1 months, p = 0.083). A similar trend was observed in resected patients converted from LAPC.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with BRPC or LAPC, primary treatment with FOLFIRINOX compared with Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy appears to provide a survival benefit for patients that are ultimately unresectable. For patients that undergo surgical resection, outcomes are similar between GEM+ and FOLFIRINOX when delivered in the neoadjuvant setting.
Topics: Humans; Gemcitabine; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Oxaliplatin; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Fluorouracil; Leucovorin; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Paclitaxel; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37020094
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13353-2 -
Annals of Surgical Oncology Feb 2022The consensus guidelines for branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN) of the pancreas are mostly based on imaging features. This study aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Imaging Features for Predicting High-Grade Dysplasia or Malignancy in Branch Duct Type Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
The consensus guidelines for branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN) of the pancreas are mostly based on imaging features. This study aimed to determine imaging features and their diagnostic accuracy for predicting high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/malignancy in BD-IPMN, including mixed type.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched, and data were extracted from relevant studies. As the main diagnostic accuracy index, diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) of imaging features for diagnosing HGD/malignancy in BD-IPMNs were pooled using the random-effects model. A bivariate random-effects approach was used to construct summary receiver operating characteristic curves for sensitivity and specificity estimation.
RESULTS
The pooled DOR was the highest for the enhanced solid component/mural nodule (MN) (DOR, 12.21; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 6.14-24.27), followed by a main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter of 10 mm or greater (DOR, 7.93; 95 % CI, 3.02-20.83), solid component (DOR, 4.85; 95 % CI, 2.49-9.42), lymphadenopathy (DOR, 4.84; 95 % CI, 1.11-21.06), MN (DOR, 4.48; 95 % CI, 3.15-6.39), an MPD diameter of 5 mm or greater (DOR, 3.69; 95 % CI, 2.62-5.19), abrupt change in MPD caliber with distal pancreatic atrophy (DOR, 2.65; 95 % CI, 1.66-4.24), thickened/enhancing walls (DOR, 2.38; 95 % CI, 1.57-3.60), and cyst size of 3 cm or larger (DOR, 1.98; 95 % CI, 1.48-2.64). The largest area under the curve (0.89 and 0.95, respectively) and high specificity (0.95 and 0.98, respectively) also were found for enhanced solid component/MN and an MPD diameter of 10 mm or greater, albeit with low sensitivity (0.38 and 0.14, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
The aforementioned imaging features could aid in predicting HGD/malignancy of BD-IPMN. Furthermore, enhanced solid component/MN and an MPD diameter of 10 mm or greater were the most important predictors of HGD/malignancy in BD-IPMN and should be considered as indications for surgery.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Humans; Pancreas; Pancreatic Ducts; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34554343
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10662-2 -
Pancreas 2018This study aimed to identify factors that explain the association of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (IPMNs-PNETs),... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to identify factors that explain the association of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (IPMNs-PNETs), radiological characteristics, and factors that might guide therapy.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the literature to search for articles on concurrent IPMN-PNET, mixed endocrine-exocrine pancreatic tumors, and/or PNET with an intraductal growth pattern.
RESULTS
A review of the literature suggests that there is some confusion about association of IPMNs-PNETs. Regarding this association, the studies collected data from 32 patients. Eleven patients presented concurrent tumors, 9 mixed endocrine-exocrine tumors, and no data were available in the remaining 7. In addition, the relationship IPMN-PNET focuses not only on the coexistence of the 2 lesions, but also on the possibility of the intraductal growth of the endocrine lesion. In the literature, in 4 cases, the preoperative radiological diagnosis had been IPMN.
CONCLUSIONS
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and PNETs may be associated in a number of scenarios. The association may be due to the concurrent existence of independent lesions, may be a mixed endocrine-exocrine tumor, or may be due to intraductal growth of the endocrine lesion. But the literature is confusing. It is not known whether the association is accidental or whether there is an etiological reason. Further studies are needed to investigate this scenario.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Carcinoma, Papillary; Humans; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 29683974
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001048 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Jun 2016Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms (ITPNs) of the pancreas are rare. The purpose of this study was to collate and analyze published data on ITPNs of the pancreas to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms (ITPNs) of the pancreas are rare. The purpose of this study was to collate and analyze published data on ITPNs of the pancreas to determine the clinicopathological features of the tumors and the surgical outcomes of patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We searched MEDLINE and Igakuchuo-Zasshi for the period of 1980 to 2015 for case reports on surgical resection for ITPN of the pancreas. We evaluated the clinicopathological data associated with pancreatic ITPNs, the prognosis for each patient, and surgical outcomes described in the case reports.
RESULTS
We obtained clinicopathological data for 58 patients (33 men and 25 women) with a mean age of 61 years (range, 35-84 years) who had undergone surgical resection for ITPN of the pancreas, including one patient from our clinic. Although ITPNs of the pancreas have different clinicopathological features to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, the treatment strategy for patients with ITPNs is the same as for patients with other cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. The immunohistochemical features of ITPNs included testing positive for cytokeratin 7 and/or cytokeratin 19 and negative for trypsin, MUC2, MUC5AC, and fascin. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after surgery for the 37 cases with available data were 97.3, 80.7, and 80.7 %, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Surgical treatment is the only curative management option for patients with ITPN of the pancreas. To determine the best management strategy for this tumor and improve accuracy of prognosis for patients, we will continue to collect and analyze epidemiological and pathological data.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27001682
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1391-6 -
European Journal of Cancer (Oxford,... Jul 2017The diagnosis and treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the pancreas pose dilemmas in the clinical practice. The present study was performed according to the Preferred... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The diagnosis and treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the pancreas pose dilemmas in the clinical practice. The present study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible articles were sought in MEDLINE up to 30th April 2016. A pooled Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors potentially associated with overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Fifty-four cases of pure squamous cell pancreatic carcinomas were identified in total. The mean age was 61.9 years, and most patients were males (61.1%). The median OS was 7 months. Resectability (p = 0.003) and more recent publication year (p < 0.001) were associated with better OS, as was low/intermediate tumour grade (p = 0.032) with RFS. Despite its poor prognosis, survival rates of pancreatic squamous cell carcinoma seem improved during the recent years; resectability and low/intermediate grade emerged as favourable prognostic factors. Collaborative epidemiological studies are deemed necessary to further validate the results stemming from the published case reports of this rare entity.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Burden
PubMed: 28511147
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.04.006 -
Histopathology Sep 2022Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the pancreas is a recently recognized pancreatic tumor entity. Here we aimed to determine the most important features with... (Review)
Review
AIMS
Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the pancreas is a recently recognized pancreatic tumor entity. Here we aimed to determine the most important features with a systematic review coupled with an integrated statistical approach.
METHODS AND RESULTS
PubMed, SCOPUS, and Embase were searched for studies reporting data on pancreatic ITPN. The clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular data were summarized. Then a comprehensive survival analysis and a comparative analysis of the molecular alterations of ITPN with those of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) from reference cohorts (including the International Cancer Genome Consortium- ICGC dataset and The Cancer Genome Atlas, TCGA program) were conducted. The core findings of 128 patients were as follows: (i) Clinicopathological parameters: pancreatic head is the most common site; presence of an associated adenocarcinoma was reported in 60% of cases, but with rare nodal metastasis. (ii) Immunohistochemistry: MUC1 (>90%) and MUC6 (70%) were the most frequently expressed mucins. ITPN lacked the intestinal marker MUC2; unlike IPMN, it did not express MUC5AC. (iii) Molecular landscape: Compared with PDAC/IPMN, the classic pancreatic drivers KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, GNAS, and RNF43 were less altered in ITPN (P < 0.001), whereas MCL amplifications, FGFR2 fusions, and PI3KCA mutations were commonly altered (P < 0.001). (iv) Survival analysis: ITPN with a "pure" branch duct involvement showed the lowest risk of recurrence.
CONCLUSION
ITPN is a distinct pancreatic neoplasm with specific clinicopathological and molecular characteristics. Its recognition is fundamental for its clinical/prognostic implications and for the enrichment of potential targets for precision oncology.
Topics: Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Carcinoma, Papillary; Humans; Pancreas; Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Precision Medicine
PubMed: 35583805
DOI: 10.1111/his.14698 -
Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases... Aug 2024Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) are rare clinical entity, with low malignancy and still unclear pathogenesis. They account for less than 2% of exocrine... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) are rare clinical entity, with low malignancy and still unclear pathogenesis. They account for less than 2% of exocrine pancreatic neoplasms. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the main clinical, surgical and oncological characteristics of pancreatic SPTs.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were systematically searched for the main clinical, surgical and oncological characteristics of pancreatic SPTs up to April 2021, in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. Primary endpoints were to analyze treatments and oncological outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 823 studies were recorded, 86 studies underwent full-text reviews and 28 met inclusion criteria. Overall, 1384 patients underwent pancreatic surgery. Mean age was 30 years and 1181 patients (85.3%) were female. The most common clinical presentation was non-specific abdominal pain (52.6% of cases). Mean overall survival was 98.1%. Mean recurrence rate was 2.8%. Mean follow-up was 4.2 years.
CONCLUSIONS
Pancreatic SPTs are rare, and predominantly affect young women with unclear pathogenesis. Radical resection is the gold standard of treatment achieving good oncological impact and a favorable prognosis in a yearly life-long follow-up.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatectomy; Female; Adult; Male; Young Adult; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Adolescent; Carcinoma, Papillary
PubMed: 37236826
DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.05.004 -
Pancreatology : Official Journal of the... Sep 2019Intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm of the pancreas (IOPN-P) is a rare subtype of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). This study was performed to...
BACKGROUND
Intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm of the pancreas (IOPN-P) is a rare subtype of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). This study was performed to summarize the clinicopathological features and management of IOPN-P.
METHODS
English-language articles were searched from MEDLINE and EMBASE from the first report of IOPN-P in 1996 until 1 May 2019 following the methodology in the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
In total, 66 patients from 24 full articles were included in the final data analysis. The patients' average age was 61 years, and the male/female ratio was 1. Most lesions were large (average size, 5.50 cm), located in the pancreatic head, and found either incidentally or by uncharacteristic abdominal symptoms. IOPN-P was usually a cystic and solid lesion with or without mural nodules on radiological examination. A definitive diagnosis was often acquired from fine needle aspiration biopsy or postoperative pathology. All tumors were diagnosed as carcinoma in situ or minimally invasive carcinoma, necessitating surgical resection. The prognosis of IOPN-P was better than that of other IPMN subtypes, even when metastasis occurred. Recurrence after surgical resection of IOPN-P was rare.
CONCLUSIONS
IOPN-P is rare among IPMN subtypes with unique pathological characteristics. Because of the nontypical symptoms and radiological findings, a definitive preoperative diagnosis usually depends on multimodal examinations. Management and surveillance of IOPN-P after surgical resection should be differentiated from those of other pancreatic benign cystic lesions because of its relative malignancy, but IOPN-P should also be differentiated from other IPMN subtypes and malignant cystic tumors because of its favorable prognosis.
Topics: Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Papilloma, Intraductal; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31375434
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.07.040 -
Pancreatology : Official Journal of the... 2016The current management of pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) is defined by the consensus European, International Association of Pancreatology and American... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The current management of pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) is defined by the consensus European, International Association of Pancreatology and American College of Gastroenterology guidelines. However, the criterion for surgical resection remains uncertain and differs between these guidelines. Therefore through this systematic review of the existing literature we aimed to better define the natural history and prognosis of these lesions, in order to clarify recommendations for future management.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) for studies published in the English language between 1970 and 2015.
RESULTS
MCNs occur almost exclusively in women (female:male 20:1) and are mainly located in the pancreatic body or tail (93-95%). They are usually found incidentally at the age of 40-60 years. Cross-sectional imaging and endoscopic ultrasound are the most frequently used diagnostic tools, but often it is impossible to differentiate MCNs from branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) or oligocystic serous adenomas pre-operatively. In resected MCNs, 0-34% are malignant, but in those less than 4 cm only 0.03% were associated with invasive adenocarcinoma. No surgically resected benign MCNs were associated with a synchronous lesion or recurrence; therefore further follow-up is not required after resection. Five-year survival after surgical resection of a malignant MCN is approximately 60%.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared to other pancreatic tumors, MCNs have a low aggressive behavior, with exceptionally low rates of malignant transformation when less than 4 cm in size, are asymptomatic and lack worrisome features on pre-operative imaging. This differs significantly from the natural history of small BD-IPMNs, supporting the need to differentiate mucinous cyst subtypes pre-operatively, where possible. The findings support the recommendations from the recent European Consensus Guidelines, for the more conservative management of MCNs.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous; Pancreatic Cyst; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 27681503
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.09.011 -
World Journal of Surgical Oncology Nov 2013Primary pancreatic leiomyosarcoma (PLMS) is rare. The clinical characteristics and prognosis is still not completely understood. The aim of the present study is to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Primary pancreatic leiomyosarcoma (PLMS) is rare. The clinical characteristics and prognosis is still not completely understood. The aim of the present study is to identify the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of PLMS from the existing reported cases in different scientific literature.
METHODS
PLMS cases reported in Chinese and English journals were collected and reviewed. Clinical features and long-term outcomes of these cases were summarized and analyzed statistically.
RESULTS
A total of 69 cases reported from both Chinese and English journals were included in the present study. An equal incidence in gender was observed. The mean age was 53.9 ± 14.7 years. The most common symptoms were abdominal mass, abdominal pain, and weight loss. The mean size of the tumor was 11.4 ± 7.1 cm. The incidence of PLMS between the head and body-tail of the pancreas had a similar pattern. Twenty-five percent of patients had distant metastasis and 19% of patients had adjacent organs/vessels invasion at the time of diagnosis. But lymph node metastasis was documented in only one (1.5%) patient. The median survival time was 48 months. The overall 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 66.6%, 51.2%, 43.9%, and 29.3%, respectively. Results from the multivariate analysis showed that non-radical resection (P = 0.000; hazard ratio (HR) 5.128; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.041-12.987) was the independent adverse prognostic factor. Adjacent organs/vessels invasion (yes) may be considered as an another potential independent adverse prognostic factor (P = 0.071; HR 2.708; 95% CI 0.981-7.474).
CONCLUSIONS
PLMS is rare without specific clinical features. PLMS is an aggressive tumor and has a poor prognosis. Radical resection can prolong survival time of the patients.
Topics: Humans; Leiomyosarcoma; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prognosis; Review Literature as Topic; Survival Rate
PubMed: 24219646
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-290