-
International Journal of Environmental... Jan 2023Background: Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune enteropathy affecting approximately 1% of the population and is associated with an increased risk of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Background: Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune enteropathy affecting approximately 1% of the population and is associated with an increased risk of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma and small bowel adenocarcinoma, whereas the association between CD and other malignancies is unclear. Since pancreatic cancer (PC) remains one of the most lethal neoplasms and its incidence is increasing despite numerous ongoing research on diagnostic biomarkers and novel therapies, we aimed to investigate whether CD has an impact on the risk of PC. Material and Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature published from January 2000 to March 2022 in two databases: Web of Science and Scopus and a meta-analysis of eligible studies. Results: Our search identified eight publications included in the systematic review. A total of five studies involving 47,941 patients, including 6399 CD patients with malignancies and 1231 PC cases were included in the meta-analysis and 221 cases of PC in CD patients with other cancers were recognized. The pooled OR for PC was 1.46 (95% CI 1.26−1.7) with significant heterogeneity (89.1%; p < 0.05), suggesting that CD patients with malignancies were at higher risk for PC. Conclusions: The association between CD and PC is uncertain. However, the results of the current meta-analysis may indicate an increased risk of PC in the group of patients with CD and other cancers. Further multicenter studies are warranted.
Topics: Humans; Celiac Disease; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Intestine, Small
PubMed: 36674320
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021565 -
Journal of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic... Apr 2023Preoperative biliary drainage (PBT) may be warranted in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma before neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Outcome of metal vs plastic stents for biliary obstruction in patients with pancreatic carcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Preoperative biliary drainage (PBT) may be warranted in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma before neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) to relieve obstructive jaundice. However, it is unclear if the use of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) has any benefit over plastic stents in this setting.
METHODS
We searched electronic databases from inception to February 11, 2022 to identify studies comparing SEMS and plastic stents for PBT in patients with pancreatic carcinoma undergoing NAT. Random effect models were used to determine pooled rates of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) and/or need for reintervention, stent-related complications and surgical outcome.
RESULTS
A total of 10 studies (474 patients; metal group-37.1%) were included. Pooled risk ratio of RBO and/or need for reintervention was lower in the metal group (RR, 0.23 [95% CI: 0.11-0.45, I = 60%]). Pooled risks of stent occlusion (RR, 0.43 [95% CI: 0.24-0.80, I = 45%]) and stent-related cholangitis (RR, 0.37 [95% CI: 0.17-0.78, I = 1%]) were lower in the metal group. However, risks of stent-related cholecystitis (RR, 1.51 [95% CI: 0.36-6.41, I = 0%]) and pancreatitis (RR, 1.52 [95% CI: 0.07-31.84, I = 66%]) were higher in the metal group. The metal group was also associated with a reduced risk of delay in NAT (RR, 0.38 [95% CI: 0.18-0.80, I = 14%]). Pooled risk ratio of R0 resection and postoperative complications was equal amongst both groups.
CONCLUSION
Metal stents are associated with reduced risk of RBO and/or need for reintervention, reduced risk of stent occlusion and cholangitis as compared to plastic stents in patients with pancreatic carcinoma undergoing NAT.
Topics: Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Cholestasis; Stents; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Cholangitis; Drainage; Metals; Plastics; Treatment Outcome; Self Expandable Metallic Stents
PubMed: 36106923
DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1240 -
Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.) Jul 2023Pancreatic cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, accounting for 4.7% of all cancer deaths, and is expected to climb significantly over the next... (Review)
Review
Pancreatic cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, accounting for 4.7% of all cancer deaths, and is expected to climb significantly over the next decade. The purpose of this systematic review and guidance document was to synthesize the evidence surrounding the role of adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy and chemoradiation therapy [CRT], and stereotactic body radiation therapy [SBRT]) in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Systematic literature searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and 11 guideline databases were conducted. Both direct and indirect comparisons indicate adjuvant chemotherapy offers a survival advantage over surgery alone. The optimal regimens recommended are mFOLFIRINOX with alternative options of gemcitabine plus capecitabine, gemcitabine alone, or S-1 (which is not available in North America). Trials comparing a CRT strategy to modern chemotherapy regimens are lacking. However, current evidence demonstrates that the addition of CRT to chemotherapy does not result in a survival advantage over chemotherapy alone and is therefore not recommended. Trials evaluating SBRT in PDAC are also lacking. SBRT should only be used within a clinical trial or multi-institutional registry.
Topics: Humans; Deoxycytidine; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
PubMed: 37504342
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070482 -
The American Journal of Gastroenterology Sep 2017Chronic pancreatitis is a putative risk factor for pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to examine the magnitude and temporality of this association. We searched... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Chronic pancreatitis is a putative risk factor for pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to examine the magnitude and temporality of this association. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for observational studies investigating the association between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. We computed overall effect estimates (EEs) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects meta-analytic model. The EEs were stratified by length of follow-up from chronic pancreatitis diagnosis to pancreatic cancer (lag period). Robustness of the results was examined in sensitivity analyses. We identified 13 eligible studies. Pooled EEs for pancreatic cancer in patients with chronic pancreatitis were 16.16 (95% CI: 12.59-20.73) for patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer within 2 years from their chronic pancreatitis diagnosis. The risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with chronic pancreatitis decreased when the lag period was increased to 5 years (EE: 7.90; 95% CI: 4.26-14.66) or a minimum of 9 years (EE: 3.53; 95% CI: 1.69-7.38). In conclusion, chronic pancreatitis increases the risk of pancreatic cancer, but the association diminishes with long-term follow-up. Five years after diagnosis, chronic pancreatitis patients have a nearly eight-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer. We suggest that common practice on inducing a 2-year lag period in these studies may not be sufficient. We also recommend a close follow-up in the first years following a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis to avoid overlooking a pancreatic cancer.
Topics: Epidemiologic Studies; Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis, Chronic; Prognosis; Risk Factors
PubMed: 28762376
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2017.218 -
Pancreatology : Official Journal of the... 2016A systematic review and meta-analysis from literature has been performed to assess the impact of targeted therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
A systematic review and meta-analysis from literature has been performed to assess the impact of targeted therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer.
METHODS
By searching different literature databases and major cancer meetings proceedings, data from all randomized clinical trials designed to investigate molecular targeted agents in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer were collected. The time-frame between January 2007 and March 2015 was selected. Data on predefined end-points, including overall survival, progression-free survival in terms of Hazard Ratio and response-rate were extracted and analyzed by a random effects model. Pooled data analysis was performed according to the DerSimonian and Laird test. The occurrence of publication bias was investigated through Begg's test by visual inspection of funnel plots.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven randomized clinical trials for a total of 8205 patients were selected and included in the final analysis. A significant benefit was demonstrated for anti-EGFR agents on overall survival (HR = 0.880; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.797-0.972; p = 0.011). In the pooled analysis no benefit on overall survival (OS: pooled HR = 0.957; 95%CI 0.900-1.017; p = 0.153), or progression-free survival (PFS: pooled HR = 0.908; 95%CI 0.817-1.010; p = 0.075) for targeted-based therapies as compared to conventional treatments could be demonstrated. No advantage was reported in response-rate (OR for RR = 1.210; 95%CI 0.990-1.478; p = 0.063). Begg's funnel plot showed no evidence of publication bias.
CONCLUSION
The use of molecular targeted agents does not translate into clinical benefit. Therefore, our work highlights the need to identify predictive factors for patient selection and rationally designed clinical trials.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 26852170
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.01.003 -
Cancer Research Communications Oct 2022Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a 5-year survival rate below 5%. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is the most commonly used blood-based biomarker for PDAC... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
UNLABELLED
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a 5-year survival rate below 5%. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is the most commonly used blood-based biomarker for PDAC in current clinical practice, despite having been shown repeatedly to be inaccurate and have poor diagnostic performance. This review aims to assess the reported diagnostic accuracy of all blood-based biomarkers investigated to date in PDAC, by directly comparing individual biomarkers and multi-biomarker panels, both containing CA19-9 and not (novel). A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA standards in July 2020. Individualized search strategies for three academic databases identified 5,885 studies between the years 1973 and 2020. After two rounds of screening, 250 studies were included. Data were extracted and assessed for bias. A multivariate three-level meta-analysis with subgroup moderators was run in R using AUC values as effect size. On the basis of this model, the pooled AUC value for all multi-biomarker panels (AUC = 0.898; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.91) was significantly higher than all single biomarkers (AUC = 0.803; 95% CI: 0.78-0.83; < 0.0001). The pooled AUC value for CA19-9 alone was significantly lower compared with the multi-biomarker panels containing CA19-9 ( < 0.0001). For the novel biomarkers, the pooled AUC for single biomarkers was also significantly lower compared with multi-biomarker panels ( < 0.0001). Novel biomarkers that have been repeatedly examined across the literature, such as TIMP-1, CEA, and CA125, are highlighted as promising. These results suggest that CA19-9 may be best used as an addition to a panel of biomarkers rather than alone, and that multi-biomarker panels generate the most robust results in blood-based PDAC diagnosis.
SIGNIFICANCE
In a systematic review and three-level multivariate meta-analysis, it is shown for the first time that blood-based multi-biomarker panels for the diagnosis of PDAC exhibit superior performance in comparison with single biomarkers. CA19-9 is demonstrated to have limited utility alone, and to perform poorly in patient control cohorts of both healthy and benign individuals. Multi-biomarker panels containing CA19-9 produce the best diagnostic performance overall.
Topics: Humans; CA-19-9 Antigen; Biomarkers, Tumor; Case-Control Studies; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal
PubMed: 36969742
DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0190 -
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging :... Jan 2021
Meta-Analysis
Editorial for "MRI vs. CT for the Detection of Liver Metastases in Patients With Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Comparative Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".
Topics: Diagnostic Tests, Routine; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 32034836
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27072 -
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging :... Jan 2021The detection of liver metastases is important for pancreatic cancer curative treatment eligibility. The data suggest that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The detection of liver metastases is important for pancreatic cancer curative treatment eligibility. The data suggest that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer liver metastases. However, MRI is not currently recommended in multiple published guidelines.
PURPOSE
To perform a comparative diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis comparing CT and MRI for pancreatic cancer liver metastases detection.
STUDY TYPE
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and multiple radiology society meeting archives were searched until November 2018. Comparative design studies reporting on liver CT and MRI accuracy for detection of pancreatic cancer liver metastases in the same cohort were included.
FIELD STRENGTH
1.5T or 3.0T.
ASSESSMENT
Demographic, methodologic, and diagnostic test accuracy data were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool.
STATISTICAL TESTS
Accuracy metrics were obtained using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of different covariates on accuracy estimates was assessed using a meta-regression model. Covariates included modality, study design, tumor characteristics, risk of bias, and imaging protocols.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies including 987 patients with pancreatic cancer (205 with liver metastases) were included. Sensitivity for CT and MRI was 45% (confidence intervals [95% CI] 21-71%) and 83% (95% CI 74-88%), respectively. Specificity for CT and MRI was 94% (95% CI 84-98%) and 96% (95% CI 93-97%), respectively. The greater observed sensitivity of MRI was preserved in the meta-regression model (P = 0.01), while no difference in specificity was detected (P = 0.16). CT sensitivity was highest for triphasic and quadriphasic examinations compared to single phase or biphasic protocols (P = 0.03). Most studies were at high risk of bias.
DATA CONCLUSION
MRI is more sensitive than CT for pancreatic cancer liver metastases detection, accounting for confounding variables. Consideration of this finding in clinical practice guidelines is recommended.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.
Topics: Diagnostic Tests, Routine; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 31943576
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27056 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery :... Nov 2020Excess adiposity is considered causally related to pancreatic cancer. While most knowledge on the topic comes from studies on general and visceral adiposity, the role of...
BACKGROUND
Excess adiposity is considered causally related to pancreatic cancer. While most knowledge on the topic comes from studies on general and visceral adiposity, the role of intra-pancreatic fat deposition in pancreatic carcinogenesis just begins to be elucidated. The aim was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review of clinical studies on intra-pancreatic fat deposition in individuals with pancreatic cancer or pre-malignant lesions.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted independently by two reviewers using three electronic databases. Studies were included if they reported on intra-pancreatic fat deposition determined based on modern radiology or histology. Summary estimates were presented as pooled prevalence or relative risk and 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies (encompassing 2178 individuals) were included. The pooled prevalence of intra-pancreatic fat deposition in individuals with pancreatic cancer or pre-malignant lesions was 52% (95% confidence interval, 38-66%). The presence of pancreatic cancer or pre-malignant lesions was associated with a significantly increased risk of intra-pancreatic fat deposition (relative risk 2.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.56-4.94, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Individuals with pancreatic cancer or pre-malignant lesions are characterized by increased intra-pancreatic fat deposition. There are sound grounds for conceptually viewing intra-pancreatic fat deposition as a combination of fat accumulation in the pancreas (due to expansion of excess visceral fat) and fatty replacement of the pancreas (due to changes in cellular identity within the pancreas). Guidelines on reporting intra-pancreatic fat deposition need to be developed with a view to informing a comprehensive and standardized characterization of this clinical entity in future studies.
Topics: Adiposity; Carcinogenesis; Humans; Intra-Abdominal Fat; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 31749093
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04417-4 -
European Journal of Gastroenterology &... Dec 2023The effect of gallstones and cholecystectomy on the development of pancreatic cancer has recently prompted many population-based studies. However, the results are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The effect of gallstones and cholecystectomy on the development of pancreatic cancer has recently prompted many population-based studies. However, the results are controversial. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the causality among gallstones, cholecystectomy and pancreatic cancer. Cohort studies published in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2023 were retrieved. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analyzed using a random-effects model. We screened 1391 articles and included 16 studies. Gallstones were not associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer ( P = 0.082), with only the Asian population ( P = 0.011) showing an increased risk in the subgroup analysis. A markedly higher risk of pancreatic cancer was observed among patients with cholecystectomy (RR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.41; P = 0.004; I 2 = 74.4%). The association remained significant in the Asian population ( P = 0.004), in the subgroup analyses stratified by sex, lag period, and time interval since cholecystectomy, and when the models were adjusted for diabetes, smoking, and BMI. Interestingly, cholecystectomy due to gallstones (RR = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.14-1.48; P < 0.001; I 2 = 30.8%), rather than for unspecified reasons ( P = 0.116), markedly increased the risk of pancreatic cancer. In conclusion, cholecystectomy due to gallstones, rather than gallstone formation, conferred an increased risk for pancreatic cancer. There was a higher risk for the Asian population for both gallstones and cholecystectomy.
Topics: Humans; Gallstones; Cholecystectomy; Cohort Studies; Risk; Pancreatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 37823406
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002652