-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2022Non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis (NIIPPU) represent a heterogenous collection of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders isolated to or concentrated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis (NIIPPU) represent a heterogenous collection of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders isolated to or concentrated in the posterior structures of the eye. Because NIIPPU is typically a chronic condition, people with NIIPPU frequently require treatment with steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy. Methotrexate, mycophenolate, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and tacrolimus are non-biologic, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) which have been used to treat people with NIIPPU.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the effectiveness and safety of selected DMARDs (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, and azathioprine) in the treatment of NIIPPU in adults.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register), MEDLINE, Embase, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, most recently on 16 April 2021.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing selected DMARDs (methotrexate, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, and azathioprine) with placebo, standard of care (topical steroids, with or without oral steroids), or with each other.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 11 RCTs with a total of 601 participants in this review. DMARDs versus control Two studies compared an experimental DMARD (cyclosporine A or enteric-coated mycophenolate [EC-MPS]) plus oral steroid with steroid monotherapy. We did not pool these results into a meta-analysis because the dose of cyclosporine used was much higher than that used in current clinical practice. The evidence is very uncertain about whether EC-MPS plus low-dose oral steroid results in a higher proportion of participants achieving control of inflammation over steroid monotherapy (risk ratio [RR] 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 to 7.17; 1 study, 41 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was reported separately for right and left eyes. The evidence for improvement (lower logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) indicates better vision) between the groups is very uncertain (mean difference [MD] -0.03 and -0.10, 95% CI -0.96 to 0.90 and -0.27 to 0.07 for right and left, respectively; 1 study, 82 eyes; very low-certainty evidence). No data were available for the following outcomes: proportion of participants achieving a 2-line improvement in visual acuity, with confirmed macular edema, or achieving steroid-sparing control. The evidence for the proportion of participants requiring cessation of medication in the DMARD versus control group is very uncertain (RR 2.61, 95% CI 0.11 to 60.51; 1 study, 41 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Methotrexate versus mycophenolate We were able to combine two studies into a meta-analysis comparing methotrexate versus mycophenolate mofetil. Methotrexate probably results in a slight increase in the proportion of participants achieving control of inflammation, including steroid-sparing control, compared to mycophenolate at six months (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.50; 2 studies, 261 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Change in BCVA was reported per eye and the treatments likely result in little to no difference in change in vision (MD 0.01 logMAR higher [worse] for methotrexate versus mycophenolate; 2 studies, 490 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). No data were available for the proportion of participants achieving a 2-line improvement in visual acuity. The evidence is very uncertain regarding the proportion of participants with confirmed macular edema between methotrexate versus mycophenolate (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.30; 2 studies, 35 eyes; very low-certainty). Methotrexate versus mycophenolate may result in little to no difference in the proportion of participants requiring cessation of medication (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.27; 2 studies, 296 participants; low-certainty evidence). Steroids with or without azathioprine versus cyclosporine A Four studies compared steroids with or without azathioprine (oral steroids, intravenous [IV] steroids, or azathioprine) to cyclosporine A. We excluded two studies from the meta-analysis because the participants were treated with 8 mg to 15 mg/kg/day of cyclosporine A, a significantly higher dose than is utilized today because of concerns for nephrotoxicity. The remaining two studies were conducted in all Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) populations and compared cyclosporine A to azathioprine or IV pulse-dose steroids. The evidence is very uncertain for whether the steroids with or without azathioprine or cyclosporine A influenced the proportion of participants achieving control of inflammation (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.02; 2 studies, 112 participants; very low-certainty evidence), achieving steroid-sparing control (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.25; 1 study, 21 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or requiring cessation of medication (RR 0.85, 95% 0.21 to 3.45; 2 studies, 91 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is uncertain for improvement in BCVA (MD 0.04 logMAR lower [better] with the steroids with or without azathioprine versus cyclosporine A; 2 studies, 91 eyes; very low-certainty evidence). There were no data available (with current cyclosporine A dosing) for the proportion of participants achieving a 2-line improvement in visual acuity or with confirmed macular edema. Studies not included in synthesis We were unable to include three studies in any of the comparisons (in addition to the aforementioned studies excluded based on historic doses of cyclosporine A). One was a dose-response study comparing cyclosporine A to cyclosporine G, a formulation which was never licensed and is not clinically available. We excluded another study from meta-analysis because it compared cyclosporine A and tacrolimus, considered to be of the same class (calcineurin inhibitors). We were unable to combine the third study, which examined tacrolimus monotherapy versus tacrolimus plus oral steroid, with any group.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is a paucity of data regarding which DMARD is most effective or safe in NIIPPU. Studies in general were small, heterogenous in terms of their design and outcome measures, and often did not compare different classes of DMARD with each other. Methotrexate is probably slightly more efficacious than mycophenolate in achieving control of inflammation, including steroid-sparing control (moderate-certainty evidence), although there was insufficient evidence to prefer one medication over the other in the VKH subgroup (very low-certainty evidence). Methotrexate may result in little to no difference in safety outcomes compared to mycophenolate.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Macular Edema; Cyclosporine; Mycophenolic Acid; Tacrolimus; Azathioprine; Methotrexate; Steroids; Immunosuppressive Agents; Panuveitis; Inflammation; Antirheumatic Agents
PubMed: 36315029
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014831.pub2 -
International Journal of Rheumatic... Feb 2024This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and cumulative retention rate of antitumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) therapy for patients with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Long-term efficacy, safety, and cumulative retention rate of antitumor necrosis factor-alpha treatment for patients with Behcet's uveitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
AIM
This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and cumulative retention rate of antitumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) therapy for patients with Behcet's uveitis (BU) using meta-analysis.
METHODS
We searched the Web of Science and PubMed databases for eligible studies up to December 1, 2022. The quality of each identified study was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's case series literature quality assessment tool. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata 16.0 software with a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Twelve studies comprising 1156 patients with BU were included in our analysis. We found that 85.0% of patients achieved ocular inflammation remission after receiving anti-TNF-α treatment, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 78.7% to 90.5%. Additionally, 77.4% (95% CI: 57.5%-92.5%) experienced an improvement in visual acuity (VA). Moreover, the pooled dose reduction of glucocorticoids (GCs) was 11.08 mg (95% CI: -13.34 mg to -8.83 mg). Throughout the follow-up period, the cumulative retention rate of the medication was 67.3% (95% CI: 53.7%-79.6%). Serious adverse events occurred in 5.8% (95% CI: 3.1%-8.9%) of cases, with the three most common types being severe infusion or injection reactions (2.7%; 95% CI: 0.8%-5.4%), tuberculosis (1.3%; 95% CI: 0.0%-3.9%), and bacterial pneumonia (1.3%; 95% CI: 0.1%-3.4%). Subgroup analysis revealed that ocular inflammation remission rates were 89.3% (95% CI: 81.2%-95.5%) for adalimumab treatment and 83.7% (95% CI: 75.3%-90.8%) for infliximab treatment. The drug retention rate after adalimumab therapy was 70.3% (95% CI: 62.0%-78.0%) compared to 66.4% (95% CI: 48.6%-82.2%) for infliximab treatment. Furthermore, the incidence of severe infusion or injection reactions was 2.2% (95% CI: 0.1%-5.8%) following adalimumab treatment and 3.5% (95% CI: 0.7%-7.7%) following infliximab treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Anti-TNF-α therapy represents an effective treatment for BU patients with favorable safety profile and high drug retention rate and a potential advantage of adalimumab over infliximab in terms of ocular inflammation remission, drug retention, and the incidence of severe infusion or injection reactions.
Topics: Humans; Adalimumab; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Behcet Syndrome; Inflammation; Infliximab; Necrosis; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Uveitis
PubMed: 38402428
DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.15096 -
Ophthalmology Jul 2024Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is a rare bilateral granulomatous panuveitis that can present after trauma or intraocular surgery (IOS). The incidence of SO after IOS varies... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
TOPIC
Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is a rare bilateral granulomatous panuveitis that can present after trauma or intraocular surgery (IOS). The incidence of SO after IOS varies among studies. The purpose of this review was to determine the incidence proportion of SO after IOS.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The incidence proportion of SO after IOS can provide physicians and patients with information on the risk of SO during the consent process before surgery.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to January 1, 2023 for population-based studies of SO after IOS. Two reviewers independently screened the results. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated incidence proportion. Subgroup analysis assessed SO incidence based on IOS type and technological advancements. Study quality and bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework.
RESULTS
The final meta-analyses included 19 studies, with 118 cases of SO occurring after 505 178 inciting events. The estimated overall incidence proportion of SO after IOS was 0.061% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.033%-0.111%; I = 83%), and the estimated incidence rate was 9.24 cases per 100 000 person-years (95% CI, 4.03-21.19; I = 88%). The average study duration across these studies was 10.8 years. Within the reviewed literature, SO after glaucoma and vitreoretinal IOS was studied most, with 9 and 6 studies, respectively. Observed differences in incidence between glaucoma (0.098%; 95% CI, 0.042%-0.232%; I = 40%) and vitreoretinal (0.043%; 95% CI, 0.022%-0.085%; I = 88%) IOS were not statistically significant (P = 0.14). Also, no significant difference was found in the incidence proportion before and after 1975, when modern intraocular surgical techniques emerged (0.060% vs. 0.058%; P = 0.98). The outcome measures showed low-certainty Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation evidence.
DISCUSSION
Sympathetic ophthalmia after IOS is rare and might not have changed over the past 5 decades. The estimated incidence proportion of SO may be useful during the consent process before surgery. Also, no significant difference may exist in the incidence of SO between glaucoma and vitreoretinal IOS, based on low-certainty evidence.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Topics: Humans; Ophthalmia, Sympathetic; Incidence; Postoperative Complications; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 38215990
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.01.014 -
Arthritis and Rheumatism Oct 2009To quantify by meta-analysis the genetic effect of the HLA-B5 or HLA-B51 (HLA-B51/B5) allele on the risk of developing Behçet's disease (BD) and to look for potential... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To quantify by meta-analysis the genetic effect of the HLA-B5 or HLA-B51 (HLA-B51/B5) allele on the risk of developing Behçet's disease (BD) and to look for potential effect modifiers.
METHODS
Relevant studies were identified using the PubMed Medline database and manual searches of the literature. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated by using the random-effects model. Subgroup meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were undertaken to investigate the effects of selected study-level parameters on the pooled OR. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Pooled results were used to calculate population-attributable risks (PAR) for BD in relationship to HLA-B51/B5.
RESULTS
A total of 4,800 patients with BD and 16,289 controls from 78 independent studies (published 1975-2007) were selected. The pooled OR of HLA-B51/B5 allele carriers to develop BD compared with noncarriers was 5.78 (95% CI 5.00-6.67), with moderate between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 61%). The subgroup analyses stratifying studies by geographic locations (Eastern Asia, Middle East/North Africa, Southern Europe, Northern/Eastern Europe) yielded consistent OR ranges (5.31-7.20), with I2 ranges of 52-70%. Univariate random-effects meta-regression indicated the percentage of male BD cases (P = 0.008) as a source of heterogeneity. The PAR within the various geographic areas were estimated at 32-52%.
CONCLUSION
The strength of the association between BD and HLA-B51/B5, and its consistency across populations of various ethnicities, lends further support to this allele being a primary and causal risk determinant for BD. Variations according to sex support an interaction of this allele with BD characteristics.
Topics: Behcet Syndrome; Databases, Bibliographic; Female; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Global Health; HLA-B Antigens; HLA-B51 Antigen; Heterozygote; Humans; Male; Odds Ratio; Risk Factors
PubMed: 19790126
DOI: 10.1002/art.24642 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Feb 2022Mouth and genital ulcers with inflamed cartilage (MAGIC) syndrome is characterized by overlapping features of relapsing polychondritis (RP) and Behcet's disease (BD). To...
OBJECTIVE
Mouth and genital ulcers with inflamed cartilage (MAGIC) syndrome is characterized by overlapping features of relapsing polychondritis (RP) and Behcet's disease (BD). To date, no studies have defined the clinical spectrum of disease in a cohort of patients with MAGIC syndrome.
METHODS
Adult patients within an ongoing prospective, observational cohort study in RP were clinically assessed for MAGIC syndrome. A systematic review was conducted to identify additional cases of MAGIC syndrome by searching four databases: PubMed (US National Library of Medicine), Embase (Elsevier), Scopus (Elsevier) and Web of Science: Core Collection (Clarivate Analytics). The inclusion criteria used were: [1] patients of any age or gender who were diagnosed with MAGIC syndrome, or both RP and BD; [2] case report or case series study; [3] published from 1985 - July 2020; and [4] in English language. Risk of bias was assessed using a checklist developed by the authors and based on the Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting (CARE) Guidelines. Search results screening, article inclusion, data extraction and risk of bais assessment was performed independently by two investigators. Clinical characteristics, particularly BD-related features, were compared between patients with MAGIC syndrome and cases of non-MAGIC RP. The performance characteristics of different criteria to classify MAGIC syndrome were also evaluated.
RESULTS
Out of 96 patients with RP, 13 (14%) patients were diagnosed with MAGIC syndrome. For the systematic review, 380 articles were retrieved of which 90 were screened at title and abstract levels. Of these screened, 60 were excluded and 30 proceeded to full text review where an additional 8 were excluded. Twenty-two articles were included in our review and from which 27 additional cases of MAGIC syndrome were identified. Pooling all 40 cases together and comparing them with non-MAGIC RP, there was a significantly higher prevalence of ocular involvement (28% vs 4%, p<0.01), cutaneous involvement (35% vs 1%, p<0.01), GI involvement (23% vs 4%, p<0.01), and CNS involvement (8% vs 0, p = 0.04) in MAGIC syndrome. A higher prevalence of aortitis (23% vs 1%, p<0.01), Raynaud's phenomenon (54% vs 11%, p<0.01), and elevated anti-collagen II antibodies (50% vs 9%, p = 0.04) were observed in MAGIC syndrome. Fulfillment of either McAdam's or Damiani's Criteria for RP plus the International Criteria for Behçet's Disease had excellent sensitivity (98%) to classify cases of MAGIC syndrome.
CONCLUSION
A substantial proportion of patients with RP can be clinically diagnosed with MAGIC syndrome. These patients have features of RP, BD, and other unique features including aortitis, Raynaud's phenomenon and elevated anti-collagen II antibodies.
Topics: Adult; Behcet Syndrome; Cartilage; Genitalia; Humans; Mouth; Observational Studies as Topic; Prospective Studies; Ulcer; United States
PubMed: 34972595
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.10.007 -
Scientific Reports Feb 2016The relationships between polymorphisms of the trans-membrane(TM) region located in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I chain-related gene A (MICA) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The relationships between polymorphisms of the trans-membrane(TM) region located in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I chain-related gene A (MICA) and Behcet's disease (BD) have been discussed previously, however, the results were contradictory. In this study, we thoroughly assess whether MICA-TM gene variants are associated with BD by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Our study focused on the effects of polymorphisms of MICA-A4, A5, A5.1, A6, and A9 from the included articles. Sixteen previous original publications representing 1,555 BD patients and 2,086 unrelated healthy controls analyzed the association of BD with MICA-TM gene polymorphisms. For the five alleles, MICA-A6 showed a strongly positive correlation with BD patients and could be viewed as an increased risk factor of BD (OR = 2.34, 95%CI: 2.02-2.70). Furthermore, MICA-A4, A5, A5.1, and A9 exhibited negative associations with BD (OR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.58-0.86; OR = 0.75, 95%CI: 0.63-0.90; OR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.44-0.91; OR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.58-0.84, respectively). Our meta-analysis confirmed MICA-A6 could be responsible for BD in three ethnic regions and should probably be treated as a risk factor for BD. MICA-A4, A5, A5.1, and A9 could be regarded as protective factors, especially in the Middle East and East Asia.
Topics: Alleles; Behcet Syndrome; Ethnicity; Genetic Association Studies; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Histocompatibility Antigens Class I; Humans; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Risk Factors
PubMed: 26875668
DOI: 10.1038/srep21033 -
Ocular Immunology and Inflammation Jan 2024To examine the long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) in patients with Behçet uveitis (BU). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To examine the long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) in patients with Behçet uveitis (BU).
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was performed. Pooled results are presented as mean difference or standardized mean difference (std diff) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Visual acuity (VA), intraocular inflammation grade, central macular thickness, corticosteroid (CS) sparing effect and adverse events were evaluated.
RESULTS
Ten studies were included finally for quantitative and qualitative synthesis. ADA therapy resulted in 0.124 (95%CI: 0.084, 0.165) logMAR improvement in VA. In addition, ADA therapy resulted in decreased grade of intraocular inflammation [std diff, -1.187 (95%CI: -1.508, -0.866)] and macular thickness [std diff, -0.564 (95%CI: -0.843, -0.286)] and caused a decrease in CS dosage [std diff, -1.809 (95%CI: -2.420, -1.198)]. The pooled rate of overall adverse events for ADA in 301 patients was 8.5% (95%CI: 0.039, 0.177).
CONCLUSION
ADA is an efficient therapy that improves VA and controls intraocular inflammation, macular edema and retinal vasculitis. As the disease exposure time increased, improvement in VA was less. The safety and CS-sparing effect of ADA were demonstrated with few adverse effects. The results provided evidence that ADA can be used safely and efficiently as the first-line drug in patients with BU.
Topics: Humans; Adalimumab; Uveitis; Behcet Syndrome; Inflammation; Retinal Vasculitis
PubMed: 36625549
DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2022.2157288 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2016Uveitis is a term used to describe a heterogeneous group of intraocular inflammatory diseases of the anterior, intermediate, and posterior uveal tract (iris, ciliary... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Uveitis is a term used to describe a heterogeneous group of intraocular inflammatory diseases of the anterior, intermediate, and posterior uveal tract (iris, ciliary body, choroid). Uveitis is the fifth most common cause of vision loss in high-income countries, accounting for 5% to 20% of legal blindness, with the highest incidence of disease in the working-age population.Corticosteroids are the mainstay of acute treatment for all anatomical subtypes of non-infectious uveitis and can be administered orally, topically with drops or ointments, by periocular (around the eye) or intravitreal (inside the eye) injection, or by surgical implantation.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the efficacy and safety of steroid implants in people with chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, and panuveitis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (Issue 10, 2015), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to November 2015), EMBASE (January 1980 to November 2015), PubMed (1948 to November 2015), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (1982 to November 2015), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com) (last searched 15 April 2013), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for studies. We last searched the electronic databases on 6 November 2015.We also searched reference lists of included study reports, citation databases, and abstracts and clinical study presentations from professional meetings.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials comparing either fluocinolone acetonide (FA) or dexamethasone intravitreal implants with standard-of-care therapy with at least six months of follow-up after treatment. We included studies that enrolled participants of all ages who had chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, or panuveitis with vision that was better than hand-motion.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently reviewed studies for inclusion. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias for each study.
MAIN RESULTS
We included data from two studies (619 eyes of 401 participants) that compared FA implants with standard-of-care therapy. Both studies used similar standard-of-care therapy that included administration of prednisolone and, if needed, immunosuppressive agents. The studies included participants from Australia, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Portugal, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States. We assessed both studies at high risk of performance and detection bias.Only one study reported our primary outcome, recurrence of uveitis at any point during the study through 24 months. The evidence, judged as moderate-quality, showed that a FA implant probably prevents recurrence of uveitis compared with standard-of-care therapy (risk ratio (RR) 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.59; 132 eyes). Both studies reported safety outcomes, and moderate-quality evidence showed increased risks of needing cataract surgery (RR 2.98, 95% CI 2.33 to 3.79; 371 eyes) and surgery to lower intraocular pressure (RR 7.48, 95% CI 3.94 to 14.19; 599 eyes) in the implant group compared with standard-of-care therapy through two years of follow-up. No studies compared dexamethasone implants with standard-of-care therapy.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
After considering both benefits and harms reported from two studies in which corticosteroids implants were compared with standard-of-care therapy, we are unable to conclude that the implants are superior to traditional systemic therapy for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis. These studies exhibited heterogeneity in design and outcomes that measured efficacy. Pooled findings regarding safety outcomes suggest increased risks of post-implant surgery for cataract and high intraocular pressure compared with standard-of-care therapy.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Chronic Disease; Drug Implants; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Prednisolone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Standard of Care; Uveitis
PubMed: 26866343
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010469.pub2 -
Ocular Immunology and Inflammation Dec 2002To study the patterns of uveitis in various geographic regions. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
PURPOSE
To study the patterns of uveitis in various geographic regions.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed using the MEDLINE database, from 1966 to present. Studies that satisfied our described selection criteria were analyzed to provide a global perspective on uveitis.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies, which were the best available representatives of Australia, North and South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa, were included in the final analysis. The distribution of uveitis cases according to the anatomical site of inflammation in the various regions, and the causes and clinical disease associations of anterior, intermediate, posterior, and pan-uveitis were studied for each of the regions and a comparative analysis was performed.
CONCLUSIONS
There are similarities and distinct differences in the patterns of uveitis in the various geographic regions. Such patterns of uveitis are influenced by combinations of geographical, environmental, and genetic factors.
Topics: Demography; Global Health; Humans; Panuveitis; Uveitis; Uveitis, Anterior; Uveitis, Intermediate; Uveitis, Posterior
PubMed: 12854035
DOI: 10.1076/ocii.10.4.263.15592 -
Ocular Immunology and Inflammation Apr 2023The present study aimed to estimate the global prevalence of ocular toxoplasmosis in the general population and patients with uveitis.
PURPOSE
The present study aimed to estimate the global prevalence of ocular toxoplasmosis in the general population and patients with uveitis.
METHODS
Four electronic databases were searched and 130 studies for evaluating the prevalence of OT among the general population and uveitis patients were included.
RESULTS
The pooled prevalence of OT among the general population was estimated at 2% (95% CI, 2-3%; 762/486 051). The highest prevalence rate was observed in America 6% (95% CI, 1-11%). In uveitis patients, a prevalence rate of 9% (95% CI, 8-10%; 5668/88 006) was reported. The countries with a lower middle income had higher prevalence rates. The prevalence of OT in posterior uveitis 33% (95%CI, 24-42%) was substantially higher than in panuveitis 7% (95% CI, 5-8%).
CONCLUSION
Our results provide a new perspective on the prevalence of OT. Knowledge of international and regional patterns of disease is essential for the establishment of precise diagnostic protocols and control programs.
PubMed: 37043543
DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2023.2190801