-
BMJ Clinical Evidence Apr 2010Constipation is reported in 52% of people with advanced malignancy. This figure rises to 87% in people who are terminally ill and taking opioids. Constipation may be the... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Constipation is reported in 52% of people with advanced malignancy. This figure rises to 87% in people who are terminally ill and taking opioids. Constipation may be the most common adverse effect of opioids. There is no reason to believe that people with chronic non-malignant disease who take opioids will be any less troubled by this adverse effect.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of: oral laxatives, rectally applied medications, and opioid antagonists for constipation in people prescribed opioids? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to August 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 23 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: arachis oil enemas, bisacodyl, co-danthrusate/co-danthramer, docusate, glycerol suppositories, ispaghula husk, lactulose, liquid paraffin, macrogols plus electrolyte solutions, magnesium salts, methylcellulose, opioid antagonists, phosphate enemas, senna, sodium citrate micro-enema, and sodium picosulfate.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Dioctyl Sulfosuccinic Acid; Humans; Lactulose; Laxatives
PubMed: 21718572
DOI: No ID Found -
International Journal of Clinical and... 2013The targeted treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) depends on confirmation of activating somatic EGFR mutation. The aim of the study was to evaluate... (Review)
Review
EGFR mutation testing on cytological and histological samples in non-small cell lung cancer: a Polish, single institution study and systematic review of European incidence.
The targeted treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) depends on confirmation of activating somatic EGFR mutation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of EGFR mutations in NSCLC detected in cytological and histological material and present literature review on European EGFR mutation incidence. 273 patients with confirmed NSCLC were entered into the study: 189 histological, paraffin-embedded materials, 12 fresh and 72 fixed cytological specimens. DNA was extracted from both types of material and the EGFR mutation in exons 18-21 was analyzed by direct sequencing. In addition the EGFR gene copy number in cases with sufficient histological material (110 patients) was evaluated by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technique. The percentage of EGFR somatic mutations was 10.62%. FISH positive results (amplification or high polysomy of EGFR gene) were identified in 33 patients (30.0%). The strongest clinicopathological correlation with the EGFR mutation was found for histological type (adenocarcinoma; p < 0.01), gender (females; p < 0.01) and FISH positive result (p < 0.05). This is the first, single institution study that estimates the EGFR mutation incidence in the Polish population. Cytological material recovered from fixed preparations and stained with hematoxylin and eosin showed DNA quality comparable to fresh tumor cells and histological samples.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; DNA Mutational Analysis; ErbB Receptors; Female; Gene Amplification; Gene Dosage; Gene Frequency; Humans; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Poland
PubMed: 24294366
DOI: No ID Found -
The Journal of Dermatological Treatment Apr 2015Topical antibiotics are not indicated for postsurgical wound infection prophylaxis in clean and clean-contaminated dermatologic surgeries, yet many dermatologists... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
IMPORTANCE
Topical antibiotics are not indicated for postsurgical wound infection prophylaxis in clean and clean-contaminated dermatologic surgeries, yet many dermatologists continue to prescribe them. The objective of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to critically assess the efficacy of topical antibiotics in terms of preventing postsurgical wound infections in the dermatology outpatient setting.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, MD Consult, Science Direct, Springer Link, DynaMed and Cochrane online medical databases were searched from 1980 to 2013.
RESULTS
Using random effects modeling, the pooled odds ratio of developing a postsurgical wound infection was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.42-1.19).
DISCUSSION
Pooled data of the four trials in the meta-analysis did not show a statistically significant difference in incidence of postsurgical wound infections between topical antibiotics and petrolatum/paraffin. In the setting of moist occlusive dressings, there is no statistically significant difference in prophylactic efficacy between applying and not applying ointment to surgical wounds. Wounds at increased risk of developing surgical site infections include wounds in diabetics, wounds located in certain anatomic regions, and wounds created by some surgical procedures.
CONCLUSIONS
Petrolatum should be used instead of topical antibiotics as a prophylactic measure to prevent postsurgical wound infections in the outpatient dermatologic setting.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Dermatologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Occlusive Dressings; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 24646178
DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2014.906547 -
International Journal of Gynecological... Sep 2014A systematic review was performed to estimate the accuracy of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) assay in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
A systematic review was performed to estimate the accuracy of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) assay in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, IBECS, BIOSIS, Web of Science, SCOPUS, congress abstracts, and Grey literature (Google scholar; British Library) from January 1990 to April 2013 was conducted. Studies that evaluated HE4 levels for the diagnosis of ovarian tumors and compared them with paraffin-embedded sections as the diagnostic standard were included.
RESULTS
Forty-five studies were analyzed, which included 10,671 women and 3946 ovarian cancer cases. The pooled sensitivity for the diagnosis of borderline tumors or ovarian cancer was 78% (95% confidence interval, 77%-79%), and the specificity was 86% (95% confidence interval, 85%-87%). Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed. For malignant and borderline ovarian tumors versus benign lesions, the area under the curve was 0.916. Besides the overall analysis, stratification was performed in premenopause and postmenopause, early and late stages, and for accuracy by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and chemiluminescence microparticle immuno assay.
CONCLUSIONS
A HE4 level is a useful preoperative test for predicting the benign or malignant nature of pelvic masses.
Topics: Cystadenofibroma; Female; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Proteins; Sensitivity and Specificity; WAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2
PubMed: 25078339
DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000192 -
Oncoimmunology Feb 2015Both IL-17 and Th17 cells have been ascribed tumor promoting as well as tumor suppressing functions. We reviewed the literature on correlations between IL-17 versus... (Review)
Review
Both IL-17 and Th17 cells have been ascribed tumor promoting as well as tumor suppressing functions. We reviewed the literature on correlations between IL-17 versus Th17 cells and survival in human cancer, following the PRISMA guidelines. Serum, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue and peripheral blood samples were most frequently studied. High IL-17 quantities were correlated with poor prognosis, whereas high Th17 cell frequencies were correlated with improved prognosis. Since Th17 cells are a subpopulation of IL-17 cells and had a different correlation with prognosis than total IL-17, we substantiate that a distinction should be made between Th17 and other IL-17 cells.
PubMed: 25949881
DOI: 10.4161/2162402X.2014.984547 -
Journal of Neuroscience Methods Jul 2010Traditionally, immunohistochemistry, immunoblotting, and histoblot have been used to detect protein in tissue samples. However, each of these techniques has a number of... (Review)
Review
Traditionally, immunohistochemistry, immunoblotting, and histoblot have been used to detect protein in tissue samples. However, each of these techniques has a number of disadvantages. The sensitivity of protein detection in immunohistochemistry is lost due to fixation or paraffin embedding methods that modify antigenic sites. The anatomical resolution and specific cellular involvement are lost in immunoblotting. Histoblot, a hybrid of these two techniques, is able to resolve these issues, but it cannot be applied to formalin-fixed tissues. A recent technique, paraffin-embedded tissue (PET) blot, retains the superior protein detection and anatomical resolution of histoblot and is applicable to formalin-fixed tissues. Unfortunately, a major obstacle to the widespread application of PET is the lack of a detailed methodological description. In this paper, we describe a PET blotting method that was formulated from our own empirical and experimental research in Alzheimer disease and a systematic review of the current literature. From this, we conclude that PET can be applied to a variety of conditions with a wide spectrum of pathology.
Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Formaldehyde; Hippocampus; Humans; Immunoblotting; Immunohistochemistry; Paraffin Embedding; Tissue Fixation
PubMed: 20580647
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.05.010 -
European Journal of Endocrinology Apr 2018Cosmetic injections with silicone and polymethylmethacrylate are not FDA approved for augmentation of body parts such as breast, buttock or legs, but they have been... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Cosmetic injections with silicone and polymethylmethacrylate are not FDA approved for augmentation of body parts such as breast, buttock or legs, but they have been widely used for decades. Cosmetic injections can cause foreign body granulomas and occasionally severe and life-threatening hypercalcemia. We aimed to systematically analyze the published literature on cosmetic injection-associated hypercalcemia.
METHODS
We searched relevant articles on hypercalcemia associated with various cosmetic injections and extracted relevant data on demographics, cosmetic injections used, severity of hypercalcemia, management and outcomes.
RESULTS
We identified 23 eligible patients from 20 articles. Mean age was 49.83 ± 14.70 years with a female preponderance (78.26% including transgender females). Silicone was most commonly used, followed by polymethylmethacrylate and paraffin oil (43.48, 30.43, and 8.70% respectively). The buttock was the most common site followed by the breast (69.57% and 39.13% respectively). Hypercalcemia developed at mean duration of 7.96 ± 7.19 years from the initial procedure. Mean ionized calcium at presentation was 2.19 ± 0.61 mmol/L and mean corrected calcium at presentation was 3.43 ± 0.31 mmol/L. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)D or calcitriol) was elevated while 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and PTH were low in majority of cases. Hypercalcemia was managed conservatively with hydration, corticosteroids and bisphosphonates in majority of cases. Surgery was attempted in 2 cases but was unsuccessful. Renal failure was the most common complication (82.35% cases) and 2 patients died.
CONCLUSION
Hypercalcemia from cosmetic injections can be severe and life threatening and can present years after the initial procedure. Cosmetic injection-associated granuloma should be considered a cause of hypercalcemia, especially in middle-aged females presenting with non-PTH-mediated, non-malignant hypercalcemia, which is often associated with elevated calcitriol; however, it should be noted that calcitriol level may be normal as well.
Topics: Cosmetic Techniques; Humans; Hypercalcemia; Oils; Paraffin; Polymethyl Methacrylate; Silicones
PubMed: 29453201
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-17-0938 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2018Recurrent corneal erosion is a common cause of disabling ocular symptoms and predisposes the cornea to infection. It may follow corneal trauma. Measures to prevent the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Recurrent corneal erosion is a common cause of disabling ocular symptoms and predisposes the cornea to infection. It may follow corneal trauma. Measures to prevent the development of recurrent corneal erosion following corneal trauma have not been firmly established. Once recurrent corneal erosion develops, simple medical therapy (standard treatment) may lead to resolution of the episode. However, some people continue to suffer when such therapy fails and repeated episodes of erosion develop. A number of treatment and prophylactic options are then available but there is no agreement as to the best option. This review version is an update to the original version published in 2007 and a previous update published in 2012.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of regimens for the prophylaxis of further recurrent corneal erosion episodes, the treatment of recurrent corneal erosion and prophylaxis of the development of recurrent corneal erosion following trauma.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; MEDLINE; Embase; LILACS; the ISRCTN registry; ClinicalTrials.gov and the ICTRP. The date of the search was 14 December 2017.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised and quasi-randomised trials that compared a prophylactic or treatment regimen with another prophylaxis/treatment or no prophylaxis/treatment for people with recurrent corneal erosion.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methods expected by Cochrane. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed risk of bias in the included studies using the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias. We considered the following outcome measures: resolution of symptoms after treatment; recurrence after complete or partial resolution; symptoms (pain); adverse effects (corneal haze, astigmatism). We graded the certainty of the evidence using GRADE for the three most clinically relevant comparisons.
MAIN RESULTS
We included eight randomised and two quasi-randomised controlled trials in the review, encompassing 505 participants. Seven studies were from Europe (Germany, Sweden and the UK), two from East Asia (Hong Kong and Japan) and one from Australia. Nine of the studies examined treatments for episodes of recurrent corneal erosions and one study considered prophylaxis to prevent development of recurrent corneal erosions after injury. Two of the nine treatment studies also enrolled participants in a study of prophylaxis to prevent further episodes of recurrent corneal erosions. The studies were poorly reported; we judged only one study low risk of bias on all domains.Two studies compared therapeutic contact lens with topical lubrication but one of these studies was published over 30 years ago and used a therapeutic contact lens that is no longer in common use. The more recent study was a two-centre UK study with 29 participants. It provided low-certainty evidence on resolution of symptoms after treatment with similar number of participants in both groups experiencing resolution of symptoms at four months (risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 1.53). There was very low-certainty evidence on recurrence after partial or total resolution at seven months' follow-up (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.07 to 15.54). There was no evidence of an important difference in pain score (score of 3 in the contact lens group and score of 2 in the topical lubrication group, low-certainty evidence) and no adverse effects were reported. The older study, using a contact lens no longer in common use, found an increased risk of pain and complications with the contact lens compared with hypromellose drops and paraffin ointment at night.A single-centre, Australian study, with 33 participants, provided low-certainty evidence of an increased risk of recurrence with phototherapeutic keratectomy compared with alcohol delamination but with wide confidence intervals, compatible with increased or decreased risk (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.48 to 3.37). Time to recurrence was similar in both groups (6.5 and 6 months, low-certainty evidence). On average people receiving phototherapeutic keratectomy reported less pain but confidence intervals included no difference or greater pain (mean difference (MD) -0.70, 95% CI -2.23 to 0.83, low-certainty evidence). No adverse effects were reported.A 48-participant study in Hong Kong found recurrences were less common in people given diamond burr superficial keratectomy after epithelial debridement compared with sham diamond burr treatment after epithelial debridement (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.50, moderate-certainty evidence). The study did not report pain scores but adverse effects such as corneal haze (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.06 to 13.87, low-certainty evidence) and astigmatism (0.88 versus 0.44 dioptres, moderate-certainty evidence) were similar between the groups.A study comparing transepithelial versus subepithelial excimer laser ablation in 100 people found low-certainty evidence of a small increased risk of recurrence of corneal erosion at one-year follow-up in people given the transepithelial compared with subepithelial technique, however, the confidence intervals were wide and compatible with increased or decreased risk (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.48, low-certainty evidence). Other outcomes were not reported.Other treatment comparisons included in this review were only addressed by studies published two decades or more ago. The results of these studies were inconclusive: excimer laser ablation (after epithelial debridement) versus no excimer laser ablation (after epithelial debridement), epithelial debridement versus anterior stromal puncture, anterior stromal puncture versus therapeutic contact lens, oral oxytetracycline and topical prednisolone (in addition to 'standard therapy') versus oral oxytetracycline (in addition to 'standard therapy') versus 'standard therapy'.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Well-designed, masked, randomised controlled trials using standardised methods are needed to establish the benefits of new and existing prophylactic and treatment regimes for recurrent corneal erosion. Studies included in this review have been of insufficient size and quality to provide firm evidence to inform the development of management guidelines. International consensus is also needed to progress research efforts towards evaluation of the major effective treatments for recurrent corneal erosions.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Contact Lenses; Corneal Diseases; Corneal Injuries; Debridement; Eye Infections; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Keratectomy; Lubricant Eye Drops; Pain Measurement; Prednisolone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Secondary Prevention; Tetracycline
PubMed: 29985545
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001861.pub4 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2023Hyaluronic acid is synthesised in plasma membranes and can be found in extracellular tissues. It has been suggested that the application of hyaluronic acid to chronic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Hyaluronic acid is synthesised in plasma membranes and can be found in extracellular tissues. It has been suggested that the application of hyaluronic acid to chronic wounds may promote healing, and the mechanism may be due to its ability to maintain a moist wound environment which helps cell migration in the wound bed.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effects of hyaluronic acid (and its derivatives) on the healing of chronic wounds.
SEARCH METHODS
We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was February 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials that compared the effects of hyaluronic acid (as a dressing or topical agent) with other dressings on the healing of pressure, venous, arterial, or mixed-aetiology ulcers and foot ulcers in people with diabetes.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 12 trials (13 articles) in a qualitative synthesis, and were able to combine data from four trials in a quantitative analysis. Overall, the included trials involved 1108 participants (mean age 69.60 years) presenting 178 pressure ulcers, 54 diabetic foot ulcers, and 896 leg ulcers. Sex was reported for 1022 participants (57.24% female). Pressure ulcers It is uncertain whether there is a difference in complete healing (risk ratio (RR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 2.35); change in ulcer size (mean difference (MD) 25.60, 95% CI 6.18 to 45.02); or adverse events (none reported) between platelet-rich growth factor (PRGF) + hyaluronic acid and PRGF because the certainty of evidence is very low (1 trial, 65 participants). It is also uncertain whether there is a difference in complete healing between lysine hyaluronate and sodium hyaluronate because the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 2.50, 95% CI 0.71 to 8.83; 1 trial, 14 ulcers from 10 participants). Foot ulcers in people with diabetes It is uncertain whether there is a difference in time to complete healing between hyaluronic acid and lyophilised collagen because the certainty of evidence is very low (MD 16.60, 95% CI 7.95 to 25.25; 1 study, 20 participants). It is uncertain whether there is a difference in complete ulcer healing (RR 2.20, 95% CI 0.97 to 4.97; 1 study, 34 participants) or change in ulcer size (MD -0.80, 95% CI -3.58 to 1.98; 1 study, 25 participants) between hyaluronic acid and conventional dressings because the certainty of evidence is very low. Leg ulcers We are uncertain whether there is a difference in complete wound healing (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.76), percentage of adverse events (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.22 to 2.80), pain (MD 2.10, 95% CI -5.81 to 10.01), or change in ulcer size (RR 2.11, 95% CI 0.92 to 4.82) between hyaluronic acid + hydrocolloid and hydrocolloid because the certainty of evidence is very low (1 study, 125 participants). It is uncertain whether there is a difference in change in ulcer size between hyaluronic acid and hydrocolloid because the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.25; 1 study, 143 participants). We are uncertain whether there is a difference in complete wound healing between hyaluronic acid and paraffin gauze because the certainty of evidence is very low (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.21 to 19.23; 1 study, 24 ulcers from 17 participants). When compared with neutral vehicle, hyaluronic acid probably improves complete ulcer healing (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.46 to 3.07; 4 studies, 526 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); may slightly increase the reduction in pain from baseline (MD -8.55, 95% CI -14.77 to -2.34; 3 studies, 337 participants); and may slightly increase change in ulcer size, measured as mean reduction from baseline to 45 days (MD 30.44%, 95% CI 15.57 to 45.31; 2 studies, 190 participants). It is uncertain if hyaluronic acid alters incidence of infection when compared with neutral vehicle (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.49; 3 studies, 425 participants). We are uncertain whether there is a difference in change in ulcer size (cm) between hyaluronic acid and dextranomer because the certainty of evidence is very low (MD 5.80, 95% CI -10.0 to 21.60; 1 study, 50 participants). We downgraded the certainty of evidence due to risk of bias or imprecision, or both, for all of the above comparisons. No trial reported health-related quality of life or wound recurrence. Measurement of change in ulcer size was not homogeneous among studies, and missing data precluded further analysis for some comparisons.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is currently insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid dressings in the healing of pressure ulcers or foot ulcers in people with diabetes. We found evidence that hyaluronic acid probably improves complete ulcer healing and may slightly decrease pain and increase change in ulcer size when compared with neutral vehicle. Future research into the effects of hyaluronic acid in the healing of chronic wounds should consider higher sample size and blinding to minimise bias and improve the quality of evidence.
Topics: Female; Humans; Aged; Male; Hyaluronic Acid; Diabetic Foot; Pressure Ulcer; Quality of Life; Bandages; Wound Healing; Pain
PubMed: 37497805
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012215.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2015Venous ulcers (also known as varicose or venous stasis ulcers) are a chronic, recurring and debilitating condition that affects up to 1% of the population. Best practice... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Venous ulcers (also known as varicose or venous stasis ulcers) are a chronic, recurring and debilitating condition that affects up to 1% of the population. Best practice documents and expert opinion suggests that the removal of devitalised tissue from venous ulcers (debridement) by any one of six methods helps to promote healing. However, to date there has been no review of the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to support this.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the effects of different debriding methods or debridement versus no debridement, on the rate of debridement and wound healing in venous leg ulcers.
SEARCH METHODS
In February 2015 we searched: The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE and EBSCO CINAHL. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting. In addition we handsearched conference proceedings, journals not cited in MEDLINE, and the bibliographies of all retrieved publications to identify potential studies. We made contact with the pharmaceutical industry to enquire about any completed studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included RCTs, either published or unpublished, which compared two methods of debridement or compared debridement with no debridement. We presented study results in a narrative form, as meta-analysis was not possible.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Independently, two review authors completed all study selection, data extraction and assessment of trial quality; resolution of disagreements was completed by a third review author.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 10 RCTs involving 715 participants. Eight RCTs evaluated autolytic debridement and included the following agents or dressings: biocellulose wound dressing (BWD), non-adherent dressing, honey gel, hydrogel (gel formula), hydrofibre dressing, hydrocolloid dressings, dextranomer beads, Edinburgh University Solution of Lime (EUSOL) and paraffin gauze. Two RCTs evaluated enzymatic preparations and one evaluated biosurgical debridement. No RCTs evaluated surgical, sharp or mechanical methods of debridement, or debridement versus no debridement. Most trials were at a high risk of bias.Three RCTs assessed the number of wounds completely debrided. All three of these trials compared two different methods of autolytic debridement (234 participants), with two studies reporting statistically significant results: one study (100 participants) reported that 40/50 (80%) ulcers treated with dextranomer beads and 7/50 (14%) treated with EUSOL achieved complete debridement (RR 5.71, 95% CI 2.84 to 11.52); while the other trial (86 participants) reported the number of ulcers completely debrided as 31/46 (76%) for hydrogel versus 18/40 (45%) for paraffin gauze (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.99). One study (48 participants) reported that by 12 weeks, 15/18 (84%) ulcers treated with BWD had achieved a 75% to 100% clean, granulating wound bed versus 4/15 (26%) treated with non-adherent petrolatum emulsion-impregnated gauze.Four trials assessed the mean time to achieve debridement: one (86 participants) compared two autolytic debridement methods, two compared autolytic methods with enzymatic debridement (71 participants), and the last (12 participants) compared autolytic with biosurgical debridement; none of the results achieved statistical significance.Two trials that assessed autolytic debridement methods reported the number of wounds healed at 12 weeks. One trial (108 participants) reported that 24/54 (44%) ulcers treated with honey healed versus 18/54 (33%) treated with hydrogel (RR (adjusted for baseline wound diameter) 1.38, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.88; P value 0.037). The second trial (48 participants) reported that 7/25 (28%) ulcers treated with BWD healed versus 7/23 (30%) treated with non-adherent dressing.Reduction in wound size was assessed in five trials (444 participants) in which two autolytic methods were compared. Results were statistically significant in one three-armed trial (153 participants) when cadexomer iodine was compared to paraffin gauze (mean difference 24.9 cm², 95% CI 7.27 to 42.53, P value 0.006) and hydrocolloid compared to paraffin gauze (mean difference 23.8 cm², 95% CI 5.48 to 42.12, P value 0.01). A second trial that assessed reduction in wound size based its results on median differences and, at four weeks, produced a statistically significantly result that favoured honey over hydrogel (P value < 0.001). The other three trials reported no statistically significant results for reduction in wound size, although one trial reported that the mean percentage reduction in wound area was greater at six and 12 weeks for BWD versus a non-adherent dressing (44% versus 24% week 6; 74% versus 54% week 12).Pain was assessed in six trials (544 participants) that compared two autolytic debridement methods, but the results were not statistically significant. No serious adverse events were reported in any trial.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is limited evidence to suggest that actively debriding a venous leg ulcer has a clinically significant impact on healing. The overall small number of participants, low number of studies and lack of meta-analysis in this review precludes any strong conclusions of benefit. Comparisons of different autolytic agents (hydrogel versus paraffin gauze; Dextranomer beads versus EUSOL and BWD versus non-adherent dressings) and Larvae versus hydrogel all showed statistically significant results for numbers of wounds debrided. Larger trials with follow up to healing are required.
Topics: Bandages, Hydrocolloid; Borates; Debridement; Humans; Hydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium Hypochlorite; Varicose Ulcer; Wound Healing
PubMed: 26368002
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008599.pub2