-
Stroke Feb 2022Women have worse outcomes than men after stroke. Differences in presentation may lead to misdiagnosis and, in part, explain these disparities. We investigated whether... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Women have worse outcomes than men after stroke. Differences in presentation may lead to misdiagnosis and, in part, explain these disparities. We investigated whether there are sex differences in clinical presentation of acute stroke or transient ischemic attack.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Inclusion criteria were (1) cohort, cross-sectional, case-control, or randomized controlled trial design; (2) admission for (suspicion of) ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack; and (3) comparisons possible between sexes in ≥1 nonfocal or focal acute stroke symptom(s). A random-effects model was used for our analyses. We performed sensitivity and subanalyses to help explain heterogeneity and used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess bias.
RESULTS
We included 60 studies (n=582 844; 50% women). In women, headache (pooled odds ratio [OR], 1.24 [95% CI, 1.11-1.39]; I=75.2%; 30 studies) occurred more frequently than in men with any type of stroke, as well as changes in consciousness/mental status (OR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.19-1.61]; I=95.0%; 17 studies) and coma/stupor (OR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.25-1.55]; I=27.0%; 13 studies). Aspecific or other neurological symptoms (nonrotatory dizziness and non-neurological symptoms) occurred less frequently in women (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.94-0.97]; I=0.1%; 5 studies). Overall, the presence of focal symptoms was not associated with sex (pooled OR, 1.03) although dysarthria (OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.04-1.24]; I=48.6%; 11 studies) and vertigo (OR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.13-1.34]; I=44.0%; 8 studies) occurred more frequently, whereas symptoms of paresis/hemiparesis (OR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.54-0.97]; I=72.6%; 7 studies) and focal visual disturbances (OR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.70-0.99]; I=62.8%; 16 studies) occurred less frequently in women compared with men with any type of stroke. Most studies contained possible sources of bias.
CONCLUSIONS
There may be substantive differences in nonfocal and focal stroke symptoms between men and women presenting with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack, but sufficiently high-quality studies are lacking. More studies are needed to address this because sex differences in presentation may lead to misdiagnosis and undertreatment.
Topics: Cohort Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diagnostic Errors; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Sex Characteristics; Stroke; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34903037
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.034040 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2020Stroke is caused by the interruption of blood flow to the brain (ischemic stroke) or the rupture of blood vessels within the brain (hemorrhagic stroke) and may lead to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Stroke is caused by the interruption of blood flow to the brain (ischemic stroke) or the rupture of blood vessels within the brain (hemorrhagic stroke) and may lead to changes in perception, cognition, mood, speech, health-related quality of life, and function, such as difficulty walking and using the arm. Activity limitations (decreased function) of the upper extremity are a common finding for individuals living with stroke. Mental practice (MP) is a training method that uses cognitive rehearsal of activities to improve performance of those activities.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether MP improves outcomes of upper extremity rehabilitation for individuals living with the effects of stroke. In particular, we sought to (1) determine the effects of MP on upper extremity activity, upper extremity impairment, activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, economic costs, and adverse effects; and (2) explore whether effects differed according to (a) the time post stroke at which MP was delivered, (b) the dose of MP provided, or (c) the type of comparison performed.
SEARCH METHODS
We last searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register on September 17, 2019. On September 3, 2019, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and REHABDATA. On October 2, 2019, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We reviewed the reference lists of included studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adult participants with stroke who had deficits in upper extremity function (called upper extremity activity).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors screened titles and abstracts of the citations produced by the literature search and excluded obviously irrelevant studies. We obtained the full text of all remaining studies, and both review authors then independently selected trials for inclusion. We combined studies when the review produced a minimum of two trials employing a particular intervention strategy and a common outcome. We considered the primary outcome to be the ability of the arm to be used for appropriate tasks, called upper extremity activity. Secondary outcomes included upper extremity impairment (such as quality of movement, range of motion, tone, presence of synergistic movement), activities of daily living (ADLs), health-related quality of life (HRQL), economic costs, and adverse events. We assessed risk of bias in the included studies and applied GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. We completed subgroup analyses for time since stroke, dosage of MP, type of comparison, and type of arm activity outcome measure.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 25 studies involving 676 participants from nine countries. For the comparison of MP in addition to other treatment versus the other treatment, MP in combination with other treatment appears more effective in improving upper extremity activity than the other treatment without MP (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 to 0.94; I² = 39%; 15 studies; 397 participants); the GRADE certainty of evidence score was moderate based on risk of bias for the upper extremity activity outcome. For upper extremity impairment, results were as follows: SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.87; I² = 43%; 15 studies; 397 participants, with a GRADE score of moderate, based on risk of bias. For ADLs, results were as follows: SMD 0.08, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.39; I² = 0%; 4 studies; 157 participants; the GRADE score was low due to risk of bias and small sample size. For the comparison of MP versus conventional treatment, the only outcome with available data to combine (3 studies; 50 participants) was upper extremity impairment (SMD 0.34, 95% CI -0.33 to 1.00; I² = 21%); GRADE for the impairment outcome in this comparison was low due to risk of bias and small sample size. Subgroup analyses of time post stroke, dosage of MP, or comparison type for the MP in combination with other rehabilitation treatment versus the other treatment comparison showed no differences. The secondary outcome of health-related quality of life was reported in only one study, and no study noted the outcomes of economic costs and adverse events.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Moderate-certainty evidence shows that MP in addition to other treatment versus the other treatment appears to be beneficial in improving upper extremity activity. Moderate-certainty evidence also shows that MP in addition to other treatment versus the other treatment appears to be beneficial in improving upper extremity impairment after stroke. Low-certainty evidence suggests that ADLs may not be improved with MP in addition to other treatment versus the other treatment. Low-certainty evidence also suggests that MP versus conventional treatment may not improve upper extremity impairment. Further study is required to evaluate effects of MP on time post stroke, the volume of MP required to affect outcomes, and whether improvement is maintained over the long term.
Topics: Arm; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Humans; Imagination; Male; Paresis; Practice, Psychological; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recovery of Function; Stroke; Stroke Rehabilitation
PubMed: 32449959
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005950.pub5 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Jun 2023Intracranial cavernous malformations (CMs) are rare vascular malformations of the central nervous system in children. Infantile patients, being a developmentally... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Intracranial cavernous malformations (CMs) are rare vascular malformations of the central nervous system in children. Infantile patients, being a developmentally vulnerable age group, pose a special challenge for management of these lesions. We pooled data from infantile patients diagnosed at our institution and individual cases published in the literature to provide input towards therapeutic decision-making.
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to identify all reported cases of intracranial CMs in the literature for infantile patients aged ≤ 2 years. In addition, cases from our institution diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 were also included. Individual cases were pooled and analyzed for clinical presentation, natural history, and outcomes from conservative and surgical management.
RESULTS
A total of 36 cases were included, of which 32 were identified from the literature. Median age at presentation was 14 months (range: 2 days to 24 months) months; 53% (n = 19) were females. Most cavernomas (64%, 23/36) were supratentorial, while 30% (n = 11) were located in brainstem and 5.5% (n = 2) in the cerebellum. With the exception of one patient, all cases were reported to be symptomatic; seizures (n = 15/31, 48.3%) and motor deficits (n = 13/31, 42%) were the most common symptom modalities. A total of 13 patients were managed conservatively upon initial presentation. No symptomatic hemorrhages were observed during 26 total person-years of follow-up. A total of 77% (28/36) underwent surgery; either upfront (23/28, 82%) at initial presentation or following conservative management. Among 12 patients who had preoperative seizures, 11/12 (91.6%) achieved seizure freedom post-resection. Among 7 patients who presented with hemiparesis preoperatively, 5 (71%) demonstrated some improvement, while 1 remained unchanged, and another patient with a brainstem cavernous malformation had worsening of motor function postoperatively. Postoperative recurrence was noted in 3 cases (3/27, 11%).
CONCLUSION
Annual risk of repeat hemorrhage may be low for infantile patients with intracranial cavernous malformations; however, better follow-up rates and higher number of cases are needed to make a definitive assertion. Surgical resection may be associated with high rates of epilepsy cure and provide improvement in neurological function in a select number of cases.
Topics: Child; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Male; Hemangioma, Cavernous, Central Nervous System; Brain Stem; Hemangioma, Cavernous; Seizures; Paresis
PubMed: 36917267
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-023-05903-6 -
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 2022Bilateral arm training (BAT) presents as a promising approach in upper extremity (UE) rehabilitation after a stroke as it may facilitate neuroplasticity. However, the...
Bilateral arm training (BAT) presents as a promising approach in upper extremity (UE) rehabilitation after a stroke as it may facilitate neuroplasticity. However, the effectiveness of BAT is inconclusive, and no systematic reviews and meta-analyses have investigated the impact of different factors on the outcomes of BAT. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to (1) compare the effects of bilateral arm training (BAT) with unilateral arm training (UAT) and conventional therapy (CT) on the upper limb (UL) motor impairments and functional performance post-stroke, and (2) investigate the different contributing factors that may influence the success of BAT. A comprehensive literature search was performed in five databases. Randomized control trials (RCTs) that met inclusion criteria were selected and assessed for methodological qualities. Data relating to outcome measures, characteristics of participants (stroke chronicity and severity), and features of intervention (type of BAT and dose) were extracted for meta-analysis. With 25 RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria, BAT demonstrated significantly greater improvements in motor impairments as measured by Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) than CT ( = 3.94, = < 0.001), but not in functional performance as measured by the pooled outcomes of Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Box and Block Test (BBT), and the time component of Motor Function Test (WMFT-time) ( = 0.28, = 0.313). The superior motor impairment effects of BAT were associated with recruiting mildly impaired individuals in the chronic phase of stroke ( = 6.71, < 0.001), and applying a higher dose of intervention ( = 6.52, < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that bilateral functional task training (BFTT) improves both motor impairments ( = 7.84, < 0.001) and functional performance ( = 1.02, = 0.049). No significant differences were detected between BAT and UAT for motor impairment ( = -0.90, = 0.681) or functional performance ( = -0.09, = 0.457). Thus, our meta-analysis indicates that BAT may be more beneficial than CT in addressing post-stroke UL motor impairment, particularly in the chronic phase with mild UL paresis. The success of BAT may be dose-dependent, and higher doses of intervention may be required. BFTT appears to be a valuable form of BAT that could be integrated into stroke rehabilitation programs. BAT and UAT are generally equivalent in improving UL motor impairments and functional performance.
PubMed: 35547621
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.875794 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Mar 2011Bell's palsy is characterised by an acute, unilateral, partial, or complete paralysis of the face (i.e., lower motor neurone pattern). The weakness may be partial... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Bell's palsy is characterised by an acute, unilateral, partial, or complete paralysis of the face (i.e., lower motor neurone pattern). The weakness may be partial (paresis) or complete (paralysis), and may be associated with mild pain, numbness, increased sensitivity to sound, and altered taste. Bell's palsy remains idiopathic, but a proportion of cases may be caused by reactivation of herpes viruses from the geniculate ganglion of the facial nerve. Bell's palsy is most common in people aged 15 to 40 years, with a 1 in 60 lifetime risk. Most make a spontaneous recovery within 1 month, but up to 30% show delayed or incomplete recovery.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatments in adults and children? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically. Please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 14 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: antiviral treatment, corticosteroids (alone or plus antiviral treatment), hyperbaric oxygen therapy, facial nerve decompression surgery, and facial retraining.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Antiviral Agents; Bell Palsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Facial Nerve; Facial Paralysis; Humans; Incidence
PubMed: 21375786
DOI: No ID Found -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Aug 2021To determine whether steroids are effective in treating adults with acute vestibular neuritis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether steroids are effective in treating adults with acute vestibular neuritis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, CAB Abstract, ICTRP, LILACS, PEDRO, ClinicalTrials.Gov, Google Scholar, NARIC, and OT Seeker.
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic review was undertaken for articles reporting subjective and/or objective outcomes of corticosteroids in adults with acute vestibular neuritis between December 2010 and October 2019. Reports of patient recovery from clinical vestibular outcomes at various time points and adverse effects from corticosteroids were of interest. Statistical analysis included qualitative and quantitative assessments. A limited meta-analysis of the data was performed through a random effects model.
RESULTS
Eight studies met the criteria, and 6 were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences between the groups (corticosteroid vs placebo, corticosteroid vs vestibular exercise, or corticosteroid vs combination of vestibular exercise and corticosteroid) were reported in the proportion of patients with complete recovery at 1, 6, and 12 months. The corticosteroid group had significantly better caloric recover at 1 month (95% CI, -16.33 to -0.32); however, there was no significant difference to the overall effect between the groups across 12 months. Subjective recovery did not differ between the groups. Five of the 8 studies reported on adverse effects from corticosteroids.
CONCLUSION
There is insufficient evidence to support the use of corticosteroids in managing acute vestibular neuritis in adults. At present, corticosteroids appear to have short-term benefits in canal paresis but no long-term benefits in canal paresis and symptomatic recovery. Future studies should consider including a wider variety of clinical vestibular tests and frequent acute follow-ups to monitor the effects of corticosteroids.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Humans; Vestibular Neuronitis
PubMed: 33525978
DOI: 10.1177/0194599820982910 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Jan 2022We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of deep lobe parotid tumors to evaluate their unique characteristics. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of deep lobe parotid tumors to evaluate their unique characteristics.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for relevant literature.
REVIEW METHODS
Studies were individually assessed by 2 independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane bias tool, GRADE criteria, and MINORS criteria. Results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed by comparing rates of malignancy between deep and superficial lobe tumors.
RESULTS
In total, 8 studies including 379 deep lobe parotid tumors met inclusion criteria. Mean age at diagnosis was 44.9 years. Computed tomography scan was the most common imaging modality. Preoperative diagnostic fine-needle aspiration was utilized in 39.4% of patients and demonstrated high sensitivity for malignant disease. The most common approach was subtotal parotidectomy with facial nerve preservation (58.9%). The rate of malignancy was 26.6%, which was significantly higher than that of the superficial lobe tumors in this study (risk ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.56). The rate of temporary postoperative facial nerve weakness between deep and superficial lobe tumors was 32.5% and 11.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Deep lobe parotid tumors had a 26.6% rate of malignancy. On meta-analysis, deep lobe tumors appeared to have higher rates of malignancy than superficial lobe tumors. Surgical excision of deep lobe tumors showed increased rates of temporary facial nerve paresis as compared with superficial lobe tumors. Computed tomography scan was the most common imaging modality. There were limited data regarding the utility of fine-needle aspiration.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures; Parotid Neoplasms; Young Adult
PubMed: 33878987
DOI: 10.1177/01945998211009235 -
Otology & Neurotology : Official... Feb 2010To systematically review and meta-analyze the results of all randomized controlled trials comparing corticosteroids with placebo for the treatment of patients with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review and meta-analyze the results of all randomized controlled trials comparing corticosteroids with placebo for the treatment of patients with vestibular neuritis.
DATA SOURCES
An electronic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CENTRAL databases, and then extensive hand-searching was performed for the identification of relevant studies. No time and language limitations were applied.
STUDY SELECTION
Prospective randomized controlled trials comparing corticosteroids with placebo for the treatment of patients with vestibular neuritis.
DATA EXTRACTION
Odds ratios (ORs), weighted mean differences (WMD), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and tests for heterogeneity were reported.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Four studies were eventually identified and systematically reviewed. Meta-analysis was feasible for 3 studies. Regarding the recovery of clinical symptoms, the proportion of patients with clinical recovery at 1 month after the initiation of therapy did not differ significantly between the corticosteroids and placebo groups (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.26-8.01; p = 0.67). The proportion of patients with caloric complete recovery was significantly different between the corticosteroids and placebo groups both at 1 (OR, 12.64; 95% CI, 2.6-61.52; p = 0.002; heterogeneity, p = 0.53; fixed effects model) and 12 months (OR, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.45-7.76; p = 0.005; heterogeneity, p = 0.03; random effects model) after the initiation of therapy. The caloric extent of canal paresis at 12 months after the initiation of therapy seemed to differ significantly between patients who received corticosteroids and those who received placebo (WMD, -12.15; 95% CI, -19.85 to -4.46; p < 0.05; heterogeneity, p < 0.05; random effects model).
CONCLUSION
The present systematic review and meta-analysis, based on the currently available evidence, suggests that corticosteroids improve only the caloric extent and recovery of canal paresis of patients with vestibular neuritis. At present, clinical recovery does not seem be better in patients receiving corticosteroids.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Caloric Tests; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Odds Ratio; Patient Selection; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sample Size; Treatment Outcome; Vestibular Neuronitis
PubMed: 20009780
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181ca843d -
Qatar Medical Journal 2021The central nervous system is an unusual location of sarcoidosis, which commonly affects the cranial nerves, meninges, hypothalamus, and pituitary gland. Involvement of...
BACKGROUND
The central nervous system is an unusual location of sarcoidosis, which commonly affects the cranial nerves, meninges, hypothalamus, and pituitary gland. Involvement of the pineal region is extremely rare. This systematic review focused on the diagnosis and management of pineal region sarcoidosis, dorsal mesencephalon, and periaqueductal region.
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to discuss diagnostic modalities and best management tools of the aforementioned pathology.
METHODS
ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases were searched for English or French articles about sarcoidosis of the pineal region, dorsal mesencephalon, and periaqueductal region. The clinical case of a patient managed at our department that we believe is directly relevant to this review is also presented. Patients' demographics, clinical presentations, presence of hydrocephalus, other sarcoidosis locations in the central nervous system, and medical treatment were collected. Surgical management, surgical approach, and outcomes and complications of each procedure were also obtained. This study was conducted in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.
RESULTS
Fifteen cases were examined. The study sample consisted of nine (60%) male and six (40%) female, and the mean age was 32 years. Eight (53%) patients had hydrocephalus, and the predominant clinical presentations were signs of increasing intracranial pressure (headaches, vomiting, and papilledema). Six (40%) patients had diplopia, and convergence-retraction nystagmus was noted in three (20%) patients. Argyll Robertson sign was present in one patient and suspected in another patient (13%). Medical treatment consisted mainly of steroids (93% of cases). Open surgery on the pineal region was performed in five patients, and four of them reported to have serious complications (such as ophthalmoplegia, hemianopsia, hemiparesis, bilateral third cranial nerve paresis, and cerebellar syndrome). Endoscopic management was performed in two patients without complications.
CONCLUSION
To treat hydrocephalus, brain imaging is mandatory in patients with sarcoidosis if intracranial hypertension is suspected. In pineal region sarcoidosis, management of hydrocephalus is the priority, followed by medical treatment of the lesion. Open surgery of any approach presents a high risk of complications; thus, an endoscopic approach is the preferred management, as it treats hydrocephalus and makes biopsy possible with minimal risk.
PubMed: 34466394
DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2021.29 -
Brain Circulation 2022Cerebral cavernous malformations (CMs) are slow-flow vascular lesions that affect up to 0.5% of the pediatric population. These lesions are at risk for hemorrhage,... (Review)
Review
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CMs) are slow-flow vascular lesions that affect up to 0.5% of the pediatric population. These lesions are at risk for hemorrhage, causing seizures, and leading to neurological deficits. Here, we conduct a literature review and then present a report of a supratentorial CM in a 2-year-old patient with no significant past medical history who presented at our institution with 1 month of eye twitching. We performed a literature search of five databases of all articles published before 2020. Our inclusion criteria included cohort and case series of children with mean age under 12 years. Our search yielded 497 unique articles, of which 16 met our inclusion criteria. In our pooled literature analysis, a total of 558 children were included, 8.3% of which had a positive family history and 15.9% had multiple CMs. About 46.1% of the children had seizures, and 88.4% of those who underwent surgery had a total resection. About 85.1% of those with epilepsy were Engel Class 1 postsurgery. Over a mean follow-up of 4.1 years, 3.4% of patients had additional neurological deficits, including paresis and speech deficits. Our analysis of published literature shows surgical intervention should be considered first-line therapy for patients who are symptomatic from CM, present with seizure, and have surgically accessible lesions. Additional work is needed on outcomes and long-term effects of minimally invasive treatments, including radiosurgery and laser ablation, in pediatric populations.
PubMed: 36267435
DOI: 10.4103/bc.bc_26_22