-
Dermatologic Therapy Feb 2022Retronychia is an inflammatory disorder typical of the great toes characterized by arrested nail growth, ingrowth of the nail plate into the proximal nail fold and... (Review)
Review
Retronychia is an inflammatory disorder typical of the great toes characterized by arrested nail growth, ingrowth of the nail plate into the proximal nail fold and paronychia. There is no standardized treatment for retronychia, and its management should be weighed based on the severity stage, treatment modality, and clinical outcome. In this paper, a systematic review of the literature was performed to assess all published data regarding the treatment of retronychia. A total of 231 patients from 24 studies were included in the analysis. Conservative management was adopted in mild-intermediate forms, consisting of medical (topical or intralesional high-potency corticosteroids) and podiatric treatment (taping, clipping back the onycholytic plate, orthosis), leading to a global cure rate of 41.2%, with no reported side effects. Non-conservative management, that is, chemical or surgical avulsion of the nail plate, proved resolutive in 71.2% of cases. Surgical avulsion of the nail plate produced the highest cure rate (78.2%), but was burdened by 9.6% of long-term sequelae, mainly nail dystrophies. A decision-making algorithm was designed to give clinicians treatment indications based on the severity stage of retronychia, treatment invasiveness, and possible clinical outcomes.
Topics: Algorithms; Conservative Treatment; Humans; Nails; Nails, Ingrown; Paronychia
PubMed: 34877747
DOI: 10.1111/dth.15251 -
International Journal of Dermatology Jun 2024Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune mucocutaneous bullous disorders characterized by acantholysis resulting from autoantibodies targeting epithelial cell surface... (Review)
Review
Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune mucocutaneous bullous disorders characterized by acantholysis resulting from autoantibodies targeting epithelial cell surface antigens. Studies reflect the presence of nail manifestations in some patients and suggest a potential correlation with clinical severity. This study examines the overall prevalence and characterizes the diverse manifestations of nail changes in pemphigus. We searched Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS from 1990 to June 26, 2023 for studies reporting different nail changes in pemphigus patients. Data were collected and pooled to obtain proportions of the prevalence of nail changes in patients with pemphigus and subgroup analysis for pemphigus foliaceous and pemphigus vulgaris. The risk of bias was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist. Of 321 studies screened, 14 studies with 1,208 patients were included. Paronychia (n = 185) and Beau's lines (n = 104) were the most common nail changes identified. The pooled prevalence of nail disease in pemphigus patients was 0.389 (number of studies; [95% CI]: n = 9; [0.160-0.680], with high heterogeneity between studies (I = 95.0%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed the highest prevalence in pemphigus foliaceous at 0.342 (n = 3; [0.109-0.688]) and pemphigus vulgaris at 0.396 (n = 5; [0.114-0.769]). Nail changes exhibited varied temporal relationships with disease onset and flares, preceding, concurrent, or following these events. Correlation with disease severity was noted, although discrepancies between studies were reported. Nail changes in pemphigus, particularly pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceous, may be underrecognized. Observations regarding temporal associations and potential correlations with disease severity highlight the diagnostic and prognostic implications of nail changes in pemphigus. The limitations of this study include study heterogeneity and possible bias. Further research to establish the correlation of the presence and severity of nail changes on the overall disease course would be helpful.
PubMed: 38887088
DOI: 10.1111/ijd.17257 -
Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology Feb 2023Cetuximab and panitumumab are common antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that can be used in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
Cetuximab and panitumumab are common antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that can be used in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although these two drugs are considered to be very similar, differences in the efficacy and safety of cetuximab and panitumumab are still unclear. We conducted this meta-analysis to explore the effects and adverse reactions of cetuximab and panitumumab in the treatment of mCRC.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang databases to identify records related to the efficacy and safety of cetuximab and panitumumab in the treatment of mCRC. The search terms were "cetuximab," "panitumumab," and "colorectal cancer." The deadline of searching was April 2022. Review manager 5.4 software was used to perform the statistical analysis for this meta-analysis. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of cetuximab and panitumumab in the treatment of mCRC.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in OS, PFS, and response rate (RR) between cetuximab arm and panitumumab arm (OS: HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.81-1.03, = .14; PFS: HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.83-1.02, = .11; RR: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.96-1.61, = .14). We also did not observe any statistical difference between both arms in incidence of acneiform rash, severe acneiform rash, diarrhea, and severe diarrhea (acneiform rash: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.84-1.42, = .51; severe acneiform rash: OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 0.80-2.81, = .21; diarrhea: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.82-1.42, = .58; severe diarrhea: OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.44-1.84, = .77). The incidence of paronychia was decreased in the panitumumab arm, but that of hypomagnesemia and severe hypomagnesemia were decreased in the cetuximab arm. (paronychia: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.55-1.00, = .05; hypomagnesemia: OR = 1.85, 95% CI =1.41-2.41, .00001; severe hypomagnesemia: OR = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.52-4.67, .0006).
CONCLUSION
There was no significant difference in OS, PFS and RR between the cetuximab arm and panitumumab arm in the treatment of mCRC. For adverse reactions, the incidence of paronychia was decreased in the panitumumab arm, and the incidence of hypomagnesemia was deceased in the cetuximab arm.
Topics: Humans; Panitumumab; Cetuximab; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Colorectal Neoplasms; Paronychia; Colonic Neoplasms; Rectal Neoplasms; Exanthema; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 35950851
DOI: 10.1080/08923973.2022.2112222 -
Oncology 2018Over the last few years only one large randomized phase III study has tried to prospectively assess the safety of cetuximab and panitumumab in a head-to-head comparison.... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Over the last few years only one large randomized phase III study has tried to prospectively assess the safety of cetuximab and panitumumab in a head-to-head comparison. Despite the similar overall toxicity profile, cetuximab and panitumumab retain peculiar safety characteristics that deserve to be deeply investigated.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review for randomized trials in PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and EMBASE using the terms ("cetuximab" or "panitumumab") AND ("colorectal cancer" OR "colorectal carcinoma"). Data of adverse events were aggregated to obtain pooled incidence rates of prespecified adverse events. Incidence of skin toxicities was the primary outcome. A χ2 test was used for comparisons of proportions and an odds ratio (OR) was calculated for comparison.
RESULTS
A total of 38 studies were included for analysis. Cetuximab was associated with fewer G3-4 skin toxicities (OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.53-0.62; p < 0.001), slightly more frequent G3-4 acne-like rash (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.48; p = 0.04), and paronychia (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.1-1.7), but fewer cases of skin fissures (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.93; p = 0.02) and pruritus (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.58; p < 0.001) than PANI.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, this meta-analysis shows that cetuximab- and panitumumab-based chemotherapy have different toxicity profiles in terms of the rate of severe adverse events.
Topics: Acne Vulgaris; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Cetuximab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Drug Eruptions; Humans; Panitumumab; Paronychia; Pruritus; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 29393280
DOI: 10.1159/000486338 -
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) Jul 2022Trametinib has been used in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients, especially those with unresectable nerve tumors, but no systematic review based on the latest... (Review)
Review
Trametinib has been used in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients, especially those with unresectable nerve tumors, but no systematic review based on the latest studies has been published. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of trametinib in treating NF1-related nerve tumors. Original articles reporting the efficacy and safety of trametinib in NF1 patents were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to 1 June 2022. Using R software and the 'meta' package, the objective response rates (ORRs) and disease control rates (DCRs) were calculated to evaluate the efficacy, and the pooled proportion of adverse events (AEs) was calculated. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence. Eight studies involving 92 patients were included, which had a very low to moderate quality of evidence. The pooled ORR was 45.3% (95% CI: 28.9-62.1%, I = 0%), and the DCR was 99.8% (95% CI: 95.5-100%, I = 0%). The most common AEs was paronychia, with a pooled rate of 60.7% (95% CI: 48.8-72.7%, I = 0%). Our results indicate the satisfactory ability to stabilize tumor progression but a more limited ability to shrink tumors of trametinib in NF1-related nerve tumors. The safety profile of trametinib is satisfactory.
PubMed: 36015104
DOI: 10.3390/ph15080956 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2021As one of the second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, afatinib brings survival benefits to patients with common and rare... (Review)
Review
As one of the second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, afatinib brings survival benefits to patients with common and rare EGFR mutations. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of 30 and 40 mg of afatinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using qualitative and quantitative analysis methods so as to provide reference for clinical medication. The PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang databases were thoroughly searched from inception to February 26, 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the quality. RevMan and Stata 15.0 were used for meta-analysis. Twelve cohort studies including 1290 patients for final analysis were selected; of which, 1129 patients were analyzed to measure the effectiveness outcomes and 470 patients were analyzed for safety outcomes. In patients with non-brain metastasis, the progression-free survival of the first- or second-line treatment with reduced-dose afatinib was equivalent to the conventional dose. In terms of safety, the reduced dose could significantly lower the incidence of severe diarrhea and severe rash, but not the total incidence of diarrhea, rash, and all levels of paronychia. The incidence of common serious adverse reactions was significantly lower with 30 mg of afatinib than with 40 mg of afatinib in patients with NSCLC. The effectiveness appeared to be similar to that in patients with non-brain metastasis. This study provides a reference for clinical dose reduction of afatinib. [PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42021238043].
PubMed: 34912228
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.781084 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2020Onychomycosis refers to fungal infections of the nail apparatus that may cause pain, discomfort, and disfigurement. This is an update of a Cochrane Review published in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Onychomycosis refers to fungal infections of the nail apparatus that may cause pain, discomfort, and disfigurement. This is an update of a Cochrane Review published in 2007; a substantial amount of new research warrants a review exclusively on toenails.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the clinical and mycological effects of topical drugs and device-based therapies for toenail onychomycosis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following databases up to May 2019: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS. We also searched five trials registers, and checked the reference lists of included and excluded studies for further references to relevant randomised controlled trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials of topical and device-based therapies for onychomycosis in participants with toenail onychomycosis, confirmed by positive cultures, direct microscopy, or histological nail examination. Eligible comparators were placebo, vehicle, no treatment, or an active topical or device-based treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary outcomes were complete cure rate (normal-looking nail plus fungus elimination, determined with laboratory methods) and number of participants reporting treatment-related adverse events.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 56 studies (12,501 participants, average age: 27 to 68 years), with mainly mild-to-moderate onychomycosis without matrix involvement (where reported). Participants had more than one toenail affected. Most studies lasted 48 to 52 weeks; 23% reported disease duration (variable). Thirty-five studies specifically examined dermatophyte-caused onychomycosis. Forty-three studies were carried out in outpatient settings. Most studies assessed topical treatments, 9% devices, and 11% both. We rated three studies at low risk of bias across all domains. The most common high-risk domain was performance bias. We present results for key comparisons, where treatment duration was 36 or 48 weeks, and clinical outcomes were measured at 40 to 52 weeks. Based on two studies (460 participants), compared with vehicle, ciclopirox 8% lacquer may be more effective in achieving complete cure (risk ratio (RR) 9.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72 to 50.14; low-quality evidence) and is probably more effective in achieving mycological cure (RR 3.15, 95% CI 1.93 to 5.12; moderate-quality evidence). Ciclopirox lacquer may lead to increased adverse events, commonly application reactions, rashes, and nail alteration (e.g. colour, shape). However, the 95% CI indicates that ciclopirox lacquer may actually make little or no difference (RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.92; low-quality evidence). Efinaconazole 10% solution is more effective than vehicle in achieving complete cure (RR 3.54, 95% CI 2.24 to 5.60; 3 studies, 1716 participants) and clinical cure (RR 3.07, 95% CI 2.08 to 4.53; 2 studies, 1655 participants) (both high-quality evidence) and is probably more effective in achieving mycological cure (RR 2.31, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.94; 3 studies, 1716 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Risk of adverse events (such as dermatitis and vesicles) was slightly higher with efinaconazole (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.20; 3 studies, 1701 participants; high-quality evidence). No other key comparison measured clinical cure. Based on two studies, compared with vehicle, tavaborole 5% solution is probably more effective in achieving complete cure (RR 7.40, 95% CI 2.71 to 20.24; 1198 participants), but probably has a higher risk of adverse events (application site reactions were most commonly reported) (RR 3.82, 95% CI 1.65 to 8.85; 1186 participants (both moderate-quality evidence)). Tavaborole improves mycological cure (RR 3.40, 95% CI 2.34 to 4.93; 1198 participants; high-quality evidence). Moderate-quality evidence from two studies (490 participants) indicates that P-3051 (ciclopirox 8% hydrolacquer) is probably more effective than the comparators ciclopirox 8% lacquer or amorolfine 5% in achieving complete cure (RR 2.43, 95% CI 1.32 to 4.48), but there is probably little or no difference between the treatments in achieving mycological cure (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.37). We found no difference in the risk of adverse events (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.92; 2 studies, 487 participants; low-quality evidence). The most common events were erythema, rash, and burning. Three studies (112 participants) compared 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser to no treatment or sham treatment. We are uncertain if there is a difference in adverse events (very low-quality evidence) (two studies; 85 participants). There may be little or no difference in mycological cure at 52 weeks (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.85; 2 studies, 85 participants; low-quality evidence). Complete cure was not measured. One study (293 participants) compared luliconazole 5% solution to vehicle. We are uncertain whether luliconazole leads to higher rates of complete cure (very low-quality evidence). Low-quality evidence indicates there may be little or no difference in adverse events (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.16) and there may be increased mycological cure with luliconazole; however, the 95% CI indicates that luliconazole may make little or no difference to mycological cure (RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.97). Commonly-reported adverse events were dry skin, paronychia, eczema, and hyperkeratosis, which improved or resolved post-treatment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Assessing complete cure, high-quality evidence supports the effectiveness of efinaconazole, moderate-quality evidence supports P-3051 (ciclopirox 8% hydrolacquer) and tavaborole, and low-quality evidence supports ciclopirox 8% lacquer. We are uncertain whether luliconazole 5% solution leads to complete cure (very low-quality evidence); this outcome was not measured by the 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser comparison. Although evidence supports topical treatments, complete cure rates with topical treatments are relatively low. We are uncertain if 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser increases adverse events compared with no treatment or sham treatment (very low-quality evidence). Low-quality evidence indicates that there is no difference in adverse events between P-3051 (ciclopirox hydrolacquer), luliconazole 5% solution, and their comparators. Ciclopirox 8% lacquer may increase adverse events (low-quality evidence). High- to moderate-quality evidence suggests increased adverse events with efinaconazole 10% solution or tavaborole 5% solution. We downgraded evidence for heterogeneity, lack of blinding, and small sample sizes. There is uncertainty about the effectiveness of device-based treatments, which were under-represented; 80% of studies assessed topical treatments, but we were unable to evaluate all of the currently relevant topical treatments. Future studies of topical and device-based therapies should be blinded, with patient-centred outcomes and an adequate sample size. They should specify the causative organism and directly compare treatments.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aged; Antifungal Agents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Onychomycosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31978269
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012093.pub2 -
European Journal of Medical Research Aug 2023The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from epidermal growth factor receptor... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to aggregate the clinical outcomes of patients with LM from EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with osimertinib. A comprehensive literature search for published and unpublished studies was implemented in April 2021 of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and several international conference databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to calculate the pooled rate of overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), one-year overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS
A total of eleven studies (five prospective and six retrospective) including 353 patients were included. The majority of patients (346/353, 98.0%) received osimertinib as ≥ 2nd-line treatment for LM, either at a dosage of 80 mg (161/353, 45.6%) or 160 mg (191/353, 54.1%). The pooled rates of ORR and DCR were 42% (95% CI 24% to 59%) and 93% (95% CI 88% to 97%), respectively. The pooled one-year OS rate was 59% (95% CI 53% to 65%) in 233 patients from five studies. The highest incidence of AEs of all grades was rash (53%), followed by diarrhea (45%), paronychia (35%), decreased appetite (35%), and dry skin (27%), based on data from four studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study highlighted and confirmed the meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile of osimertinib for the treatment of LM from EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Antineoplastic Agents; ErbB Receptors; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Mutation
PubMed: 37542339
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01219-y -
European Journal of Cancer Care Sep 2019This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of cryotherapy and nail solution (NS) use in preventing nail toxicity (NT) induced by taxane-based chemotherapy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of cryotherapy and nail solution (NS) use in preventing nail toxicity (NT) induced by taxane-based chemotherapy.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov registry databases were searched for relevant studies published up to December 2018. The primary outcome was taxane-induced NT. Secondary outcomes were skin toxicity (ST), time to toxicity and patient comfort.
RESULTS
We reviewed three randomised control trials and six prospective studies with 708 patients. For meta-analysis, taxane-induced NT grading was compared. NT and ST were significantly lower in the cryotherapy patients than in the controls (grade 1 NT: risk ratio [RR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.30-0.89; grade 2-3 NT: RR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.11-1.12; total NT: RR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.30-0.79; ST: RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.33-0.64). The NS-treated patients exhibited significantly lower NT than the controls.
CONCLUSIONS
Nail solution-treated or cryotherapy patients exhibited lower NT incidence and severity associated with taxane-based chemotherapy than the controls. For patients who can afford and comply with NS use or cryotherapy, these measures represent effective prophylactic management for taxane-induced NT and improve their quality of life and functional statuses. Further studies are needed to establish the routine usage protocols, long-term efficacy and safety for these interventions.
Topics: Cryotherapy; Docetaxel; Humans; Nail Diseases; Neoplasms; Oils, Volatile; Onycholysis; Paclitaxel; Paronychia; Pigmentation Disorders; Plant Oils; Taxoids; Waxes
PubMed: 31184794
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13118 -
American Journal of Clinical Oncology Aug 2016Cetuximab was shown in phase III clinical trials to improve chemotherapy efficacy in patients with advanced colorectal and head-neck cancer. Appropriate management of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Cetuximab was shown in phase III clinical trials to improve chemotherapy efficacy in patients with advanced colorectal and head-neck cancer. Appropriate management of skin reactions associated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy is necessary to allow adequate drug compliance and to improve patient quality of life and outcomes.
METHODS
The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used by a group of experts to produce new Italian recommendations on the management of skin reactions in this setting. Statements were generated on the basis of an updated systematic review of the literature and rated twice by a panel of 38 expert physicians. A meeting of the panel was held after the first rating session.
RESULTS
Skin reactions included acneiformic rash, skin dryness (xerosis), pruritus, paronychia, hair abnormalities, mucositis, and increased growth of eyelashes or facial hair. Updates of the previous recommendations on the prevention and treatment of each type of reaction were proposed.
CONCLUSIONS
This updated Expert Opinion focuses on how to assess and correctly grade skin reactions according to the latest National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and on how to manage these adverse events in clinical practice.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cetuximab; Chemoradiotherapy; Consensus; Drug Eruptions; Humans; Italy; Neoplasms; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Radiation Injuries; Severity of Illness Index; Skin
PubMed: 27077276
DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000291