-
Orthopaedic Surgery May 2017Giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive tumor with a certain distant metastatic rate. For sacral GCT (SGCT) and pelvic GCT (PGCT), surgery has its... (Review)
Review
Giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive tumor with a certain distant metastatic rate. For sacral GCT (SGCT) and pelvic GCT (PGCT), surgery has its limitations, especially for unresectable or recurrent tumors. Selective arterial embolization (SAE) is reported to be an option for treatment in several cases, but there are few systematic reviews on the effects of SAE on SGCT and/or PGCT. Medline and Embase databases were searched for eligible English articles. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were conducted before searching. All the clinical factors were measured by SPSS software, with P-values ≤0.05 considered statistically significant. A total of 9 articles were retrieved, including 44 patients receiving SAE ranging from 1 to 10 times. During the mean follow-up period of 85.8 months, the radiographic response rate was 81.8%, with a local control and overall survival rate of 75% and 81.8%, respectively. No bowel, bladder, or sexual dysfunction was observed. Three patients developed distant metastases and finally died. Patients with primary tumors tended to have better prognosis than those with recurrence (P = 0.039). The favorable outcomes of SAE suggest that it may be an alternative treatment for SGCT and PGCT patients for whom surgery is not appropriate.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Bone Neoplasms; Embolization, Therapeutic; Female; Giant Cell Tumor of Bone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pelvic Bones; Pelvic Neoplasms; Sacrum; Spinal Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 28644557
DOI: 10.1111/os.12336 -
Techniques in Coloproctology Nov 2018Pelvic exenteration represents the best treatment option for cure of locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. This systematic review sought to evaluate current...
BACKGROUND
Pelvic exenteration represents the best treatment option for cure of locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. This systematic review sought to evaluate current literature regarding short and long term treatment outcomes and long term survival following pelvic exenteration.
METHODS
A systematic search of the MEDLINE, PubMed and Ovid databases was conducted to identify suitable articles published between 2001 and 2016. The article search was performed in line with Cochrane methodology and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses statement.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included in the final analysis, incorporating 1016 patients. Sixty-three percent of patients were male and median patient age was 59 years. Median operating time was 7.2 h with median blood loss of 1.9 l. Median postoperative stay was 17 days with a median 30-day mortality of 0. Complication rates were 31.6-86% with a return to theatre rate of 14.6%. Median R0 resection rate was 74% and was higher for primary cancer (82.6% versus 58% for recurrent cancer). Mean overall survival was 31 months and median 5-year survival was 32%. Recurrently identified indicators of adverse outcome included R1/2 resection, preoperative pelvic pain and previous abdominoperineal resection of the rectum.
CONCLUSIONS
Pelvic exenteration remains a major operation associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in preoperative assessment and staging, R1 resection rates remain high. There is also a high degree of variability of reporting outcomes and standardisation of this process would aid comparison of results between centres and drive forward research in this area.
Topics: Blood Loss, Surgical; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Operative Time; Pelvic Exenteration; Pelvis; Rectal Neoplasms; Rectum; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30506497
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1883-1 -
JBJS Reviews Apr 2018Limb-sparing resection and reconstruction for pelvic sarcomas in multiple small studies have been fraught with complications, reoperations, and impaired patient...
BACKGROUND
Limb-sparing resection and reconstruction for pelvic sarcomas in multiple small studies have been fraught with complications, reoperations, and impaired patient function. However, the non-oncologic complication and reoperation rates and functional outcomes for patients have never been rigorously compiled, to our knowledge. A systematic review was undertaken to more accurately determine the non-oncologic complication and reoperation rates and functional outcomes for patients after pelvic sarcoma resection and reconstruction.
METHODS
The review was performed in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed and Cochrane database searches of English-only studies using the terms "pelvis AND sarcoma" and "pelvis AND sarcoma AND surgery" were performed. Study inclusion criteria were ≥10 patients enrolled, at least 12 months of follow-up, utilization of comparable functional outcome measure(s), and the majority of the resections treating primary bone sarcoma.
RESULTS
In this study, 2,350 studies were reviewed, of which 22 Level-IV studies with a total of 801 patients met inclusion criteria. Reconstructive techniques varied widely and included allografts, allograft-prosthesis composites, saddle prostheses, custom endoprostheses, and irradiated autografts. Pooled means showed a mean 5-year patient survival of 55%. The mean non-oncologic complication rate was 49%. The mean non-oncologic reoperation rate was 37%. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 65%.
CONCLUSIONS
The non-oncologic complication and reoperation rates for pelvic reconstructions are remarkably high and 5-year survival is poor. Functional outcomes are acceptable but may not be better than a resection of the same Enneking and Dunham type without reconstruction. Consideration should be given to forgoing pelvic reconstruction, especially in patients with poor overall prognosis. Further studies comparing non-oncologic complication rates, reoperation rates, and functional outcomes in patients with equivalent resections treated with or without reconstruction are needed to further elucidate the utility of pelvic reconstruction.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Topics: Adult; Bone Neoplasms; Bone Transplantation; Female; Humans; Limb Salvage; Male; Middle Aged; Osteosarcoma; Pelvis; Sarcoma; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 29688908
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00072 -
BJU International May 2014To compare extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) with non-extended pelvic lymph node dissection (non-ePLND) and assess their influence on recurrence-free... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Extended vs non-extended pelvic lymph node dissection and their influence on recurrence-free survival in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
OBJECTIVE
To compare extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) with non-extended pelvic lymph node dissection (non-ePLND) and assess their influence on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.
METHODS
Through a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases in September 2012, we performed a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of all comparative studies assessing the extent of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and its influence on RFS.
RESULTS
Six studies with a total of 2824 patients were identified. Overall analysis showed a significantly better RFS rate in patients who had undergone ePLND than in those who had undergone non-ePLND (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65; P < 0.001). A subgroup analysis found that, compared with non-ePLND, ePLND was associated with a better RFS rate for both patients with negative lymph nodes (HR: 0.68; P = 0.007) and those with positive lymph nodes (HR: 0.58; P < 0.001). When stratified by pathological T stage, ePLND provided additional RFS benefits for patients with pT3-4 disease (HR: 0.61; P < 0.001), but not for patients with ≤pT2 disease (HR: 0.95; P = 0.81).
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this meta-analysis indicate that ePLND provides a RFS benefit compared with non-ePLND. On subgroup analysis, ePLND provides better RFS not only for patients who had positive lymph nodes and pT3-4 disease, but also for patients with negative lymph nodes. Two randomized controlled trials on ePLND vs non-ePLND are awaited which should provide more clinically meaningful results.
Topics: Cystectomy; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pelvis; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 24053715
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12371 -
Radiotherapy and Oncology : Journal of... Jan 2014Patients with prostate cancer (PC) and a symptomatic pelvic tumor may be treated with palliative pelvic radiotherapy for symptom relief or to delay symptom progression.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Patients with prostate cancer (PC) and a symptomatic pelvic tumor may be treated with palliative pelvic radiotherapy for symptom relief or to delay symptom progression. Radiotherapy dose and fractionation regimens vary. We aimed to provide an overview of the literature and to evaluate palliative pelvic radiotherapy of PC focusing on symptomatic effect, quality of life (QOL), and toxicity, and to determine the optimal radiotherapy schedule.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Systematic literature searches of Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were performed through 2011. Studies reporting symptom and QOL responses were eligible.
RESULTS
Nine studies were included, all retrospective chart reviews. There were large variations in radiotherapy dose and fractionation. Overall symptom response rate was 75% and positive responses were reported for hemorrhage (73%), pain (80%), bladder outlet obstruction (63%), rectal symptoms (78%) and ureteric obstruction (62%). Toxicity results were not evaluable.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite limitations in the review process and the included studies, we conclude that pelvic radiotherapy for symptomatic PC appears to provide effective palliation of a variety of symptoms. There is currently no valid documentation regarding onset or duration of palliation. No recommendations can be provided regarding target dose or fractionation schedule in this context.
Topics: Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Humans; Male; Palliative Care; Prostatic Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 24044801
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.008 -
Techniques in Coloproctology Dec 2023A common and debilitating complication of low anterior resection for rectal cancer is low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). As a multifactorial entity, LARS is poorly...
BACKGROUND
A common and debilitating complication of low anterior resection for rectal cancer is low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). As a multifactorial entity, LARS is poorly understood and challenging to treat. Despite this, prevention strategies are commonly overlooked. Our aim was to review the pathophysiology of LARS and explore current evidence on the efficacy and feasibility of prophylactic techniques.
METHODS
A literature review was performed between [1st January 2000 to 1st October 2023] for studies which investigated preventative interventions for LARS. Mechanisms by which LARS develop are described, followed by a review of prophylactic strategies to prevent LARS. Medline, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were searched, 189 articles screened, 8 duplicates removed and 18 studies reviewed.
RESULTS
Colonic dysmotility, anal sphincter dysfunction and neorectal dysfunction all contribute to the development of LARS, with the complex mechanism of defecation interrupted by surgery. Transanal irrigation (TAI) and pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) have shown benefits in preventing LARS, but may be limited by patient compliance. Intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) and robotic-assisted surgery have shown some promise in surgically preventing LARS. Nerve stimulation and other novel strategies currently used in treatment of LARS have yet to be investigated in their roles prophylactically.
CONCLUSIONS
To date, there is a limited evidence base for all preventative strategies including IONM, RAS, PFP and TAI. These strategies are limited by either access (IONM, RAS and PFP) or acceptability (PFP and TAI), which are both key to the success of any intervention. The results of ongoing trials will serve to assess acceptability, while technological advancement may improve access to some of the aforementioned strategies.
Topics: Humans; Anal Canal; Low Anterior Resection Syndrome; Postoperative Complications; Quality of Life; Rectal Neoplasms; Robotic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 38091118
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02872-5 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... May 2017Pelvic exenteration is a complex surgical procedure associated with considerable morbidity. Quality of life (QoL) is a crucial metric of surgical outcome. The aim of... (Review)
Review
AIM
Pelvic exenteration is a complex surgical procedure associated with considerable morbidity. Quality of life (QoL) is a crucial metric of surgical outcome. The aim of this review was to assess the QoL following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and local recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).
METHOD
A comprehensive search of studies published between 2000 and 2016 that examined QoL outcome following pelvic exenteration was performed. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Colorectal (FACT-C), SF-36 version 2, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, and Brief Pain Inventory assessments from these studies were reviewed.
RESULTS
Seven studies reporting on 382 patients were included. Baseline QoL was the strongest predictor of postoperative QoL. Female gender, total pelvic exenteration with or without bone resection, and positive surgical margins were associated with a reduced QoL. In the majority of patients, QoL gradually improved between 2 and 9 months post-operation.
CONCLUSION
QoL is an important patient-reported outcome. This review highlights factors associated with reduced postoperative QoL that should be borne in mind when surgical resection is being considered.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pelvic Exenteration; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Period; Quality of Life; Rectal Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28267255
DOI: 10.1111/codi.13647 -
Radiotherapy and Oncology : Journal of... Nov 2017To perform a systematic review regarding the use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for the re-irradiation of recurrent malignant disease within the pelvis, to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review regarding the use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for the re-irradiation of recurrent malignant disease within the pelvis, to guide the clinical implementation of this technique.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic search strategy was adopted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases.
RESULTS
195 articles were identified, of which 17 were appropriate for inclusion. Studies were small and data largely retrospective. In total, 205 patients are reported to have received pelvic SABR re-irradiation. Dose and fractionation schedules and re-irradiated volumes are highly variable. Little information is provided regarding organ at risk constraints adopted in the re-irradiation setting. Treatment appears well-tolerated overall, with nine grade 3 and six grade 4 toxicities amongst thirteen re-irradiated patients. Local control at one year ranged from 51% to 100%. Symptomatic improvements were also noted.
CONCLUSIONS
For previously irradiated patients with recurrent pelvic disease, SABR re-irradiation could be a feasible intervention for those who otherwise have limited options. Evidence to support this technique is limited but shows initial promise. Based on the available literature, suggestions for a more formal SABR re-irradiation pathway are proposed. Prospective studies and a multidisciplinary approach are required to optimise future treatment.
Topics: Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pelvic Neoplasms; Radiosurgery; Re-Irradiation; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 29066125
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.030 -
International Journal of Surgery... Mar 2024Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is commonly performed during radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer staging. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A comparative analysis of perioperative complications and biochemical recurrence between standard and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is commonly performed during radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer staging. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze existing evidence compare perioperative complications associated with standard (sPLND) versus extended PLND templates (ePLND) in RP patients.
METHODS
A meta-analysis of prospective studies on PLND complications was conducted. Systematic searches were performed on Web of Science, Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until May 2023. Risk ratios (RRs) were estimated using random-effects models in the meta-analysis. The statistical analysis of the data was carried out using Review Manager software.
RESULTS
Nine studies, including three randomized clinical trial and six prospective studies, with a total of 4962 patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis revealed that patients undergoing ePLND had a higher risk of partial perioperative complications, such as lymphedema ( I2 =28%; RR 0.05; 95% CI: 0.01-0.27; P <0.001) and urinary retention ( I2 =0%; RR 0.30; 95% CI: 0.09-0.94; P =0.04) compared to those undergoing sPLND. However, there were no significant difference was observed in pelvic hematoma ( I2 =0%; RR 1.65; 95% CI: 0.44-6.17; P =0.46), thromboembolic ( I2 =57%; RR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.35-2.38; P =0.85), ureteral injury ( I2 =33%; RR 0.28; 95% CI: 0.05-1.52; P =0.14), intraoperative bowel injury ( I2 =0%; RR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.14-5.27; P =0.88), and lymphocele ( I2 =0%; RR 1.58; 95% CI: 0.54-4.60; P =0.40) between sPLND and ePLND. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in overall perioperative complications ( I2 =85%; RR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.40-1.16; P =0.16). Furthermore, ePLND did not significantly reduce biochemical recurrence ( I2 =68%; RR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.28-1.24; P =0.16) of prostate cancer.
CONCLUSION
This analysis found no significant differences in overall perioperative complications or biochemical recurrence between sPLND and ePLND, but ePLND may offer enhanced diagnostic advantages by increasing the detection rate of lymph node metastasis.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pelvis; Lymph Node Excision; Prostatic Neoplasms; Prostatectomy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38052016
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000997 -
World Journal of Urology Mar 2021To systematically review the relevant literature that evaluates the LN topographical distribution and propose a uniform template.
PURPOSE
To systematically review the relevant literature that evaluates the LN topographical distribution and propose a uniform template.
METHODS
A bibliographic search of PubMed/Medline, Embase and SCOPUS was performed for studies reporting data of LN imaging and/or nodal resection.
RESULTS
101 and 26 articles met the inclusion criteria for PCa and BCa, respectively. In PCa, the most common locations of positive LNs for surgical and imaging studies were external iliac (both 38 studies), followed by obturator (38 and 37, respectively). Similarly, in BCa, the most common location of positive nodes for surgical and imaging studies were external iliac (19 and 4, respectively), followed by obturator (15 and 3 studies, respectively). In PCa, median percentages of positive external iliac nodes/patient were 12.2% and 11.6% for surgical and imaging studies, respectively while corresponding rates for BCa were 3.9% and 17.6%. There were high risks of bias across studies as well as high heterogeneity in the definition of the anatomic boundaries of lymphadenectomy templates.
CONCLUSIONS
This review highlights the lack of detailed information on exact LN templates and metastases location, which in turn hinders generation of high-quality evidence on optimal lymphadenectomy templates. Our proposed template is applicable for both imaging and surgical description and could facilitate the translation of anatomical location from imaging to surgical resection.
Topics: Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Pelvis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 32495153
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03281-1