-
Oncotarget Sep 2015Most comprehensive treatments for PBC include UDCA, combination of methotrexate (MTX), corticosteroids (COT), colchicine (COC) or bezafibrate (BEF), cyclosporin A (CYP),... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Most comprehensive treatments for PBC include UDCA, combination of methotrexate (MTX), corticosteroids (COT), colchicine (COC) or bezafibrate (BEF), cyclosporin A (CYP), D-penicillamine (DPM), methotrexate (MTX), or azathioprine (AZP). Since the optimum treatment regimen remains inconclusive, we aimed to compare these therapies in terms of patient mortality or liver transplantation (MOLT) and adverse event (AE).
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials until August 2014. We estimated HRs for MOLT and ORs for AE. The sensitivity analysis based on dose of UDCA was also performed.
RESULTS
The search identified 49 studies involving 12 different treatment regimens and 4182 patients. Although no statistical significance can be found in MOLT, COT plus UDCA was ranked highest for efficacy outcome amongst all the treatment regimes. While for AEs, compared with OBS or UDCA, monotherapy with COC (OR 5.6, P < 0.001; OR 5.89, P < 0.001), CYP (OR 3.24, P < 0.001; OR 3.42, P < 0.001), DPM (OR 8.00, P < 0.001; OR 8.45, P < 0.001) and MTX (OR 5.31, P < 0.001; OR 5.61, P < 0.001) were associated with statistically significant increased risk of AEs. No significant differences were found for other combination regimes. Effect estimates from indirect comparisons matched closely to estimates derived from pairwise comparisons. Consistently, in the sensitivity analysis, results closely resembled our primary analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
COT plus UDCA was the most efficacious among treatment regimens both for MOLT and AEs.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Azathioprine; Bezafibrate; Bile Ducts; Colchicine; Cyclosporine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Penicillamine; Treatment Outcome; Ursodeoxycholic Acid
PubMed: 26109432
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4528 -
European Review For Medical and... Nov 2017Dry mouth (xerostomia), is a fairly common, well-researched condition, which is an indirect cause of oral malodour. This systematic literature review looked into another... (Review)
Review
Dry mouth (xerostomia), is a fairly common, well-researched condition, which is an indirect cause of oral malodour. This systematic literature review looked into another cause of bad breath: adverse drug reactions in the orofacial region causing halitosis. The study focused on extraoral halitosis, and its subdivisions, particularly blood borne halitosis in which malodourous compounds in the blood stream are carried to the lungs, passively diffused across the pulmonary alveolar membrane to enter the breath. An electronic search was conducted in various databases. Inclusion criteria were: editorials, case control studies, retrospective studies and randomized double-blind studies published in English between 1983 and March 2017. The search identified a total of 23 articles. According to these, drug-related halitosis may be caused by nine medications. Dimethyl sulfoxide, cysteamine and suplatast tosilate are metabolised to dimethyl sulfide, a malodourous compound that is stable in blood and is transported into the breath. Disulfiram is reduced to carbon disulfide, also a stable compound in blood. Nitric oxide reacts with foul-smelling volatile organosulfur compounds. The degradation of penicillamine raises the pH level, favouring the growth of gram-negative bacteria in the oral cavity producing halitosis. Chloral hydrate, phenothiazine, and paraldehyde could not be related to halitosis. The analysis showed that halitosis can be caused by medication but does not correlate to any specific disease or specific form of drug therapy. The pharmacological compounds identified as causes of halitosis are administered to treat a broad spectrum of diseases, or in therapeutic regimes.
Topics: Gram-Negative Bacteria; Halitosis; Humans; Hydrogen Sulfide; Penicillamine; Smell; Sulfhydryl Compounds; Sulfides
PubMed: 29164566
DOI: No ID Found -
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Mar 2014To update the evidence for the safety of synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs), glucocorticoids (GC) and biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) in patients with... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To update the evidence for the safety of synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs), glucocorticoids (GC) and biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to inform the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of RA.
METHODS
Systematic literature review (SLR) of observational studies (including registries). Interventions were any bDMARD (anakinra, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab, golimumab or certolizumab pegol) or sDMARD (methotrexate, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, gold/auranofin, azathioprine, chlorambucil, chloroquine, cyclosporin, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate, minocycline, penicillamine, tacrolimus or tofacitinib) and a comparator was required. Information on GCs was collected from the included studies. All safety outcomes were included.
RESULTS
Forty-nine observational studies addressing diverse safety outcomes of therapy with bDMARDs met eligibility criteria. Substantial heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis of any of the outcomes. Patients on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) compared to patients on conventional sDMARDs had a higher risk of serious infections (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.1-1.8), a higher risk of tuberculosis, and an increased risk of infection by herpes zoster cannot be excluded. Patients on TNFi did not have an increased risk for malignancies in general, lymphoma or non-melanoma skin cancer, but the risk of melanoma may be slightly increased (aHR 1.5). From the studies identified on conventional sDMARDs, no new safety signals were found.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings from this SLR confirm the known safety pattern of sDMARDs and bDMARDs for the treatment of RA.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biological Products; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Neoplasms; Opportunistic Infections; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Assessment; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
PubMed: 24401994
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204575 -
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Aug 2023A variety of dietary adjuncts are known to affect the pathophysiology of glioma, making them a potential therapeutic adjunct to standard of care. We systematically... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
A variety of dietary adjuncts are known to affect the pathophysiology of glioma, making them a potential therapeutic adjunct to standard of care. We systematically reviewed clinical outcomes in glioma patients treated with one or more nutritional adjunct and/or an antimetabolite drug.
METHODOLOGY
A systematic review of the literature following PRISMA guidelines was performed using Pubmed from inception till February 2023. In total, 22 manuscripts on nutrition representing 828 patients were included in the review. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the outcomes of various adjuncts.
RESULTS
The median overall survival (OS) increased for newly diagnosed (21 months) and recurrent cases (10 months) when compared to historical data. For newly diagnosed cases, a ketogenic diet had the highest median OS of all the adjuncts (42.6 months) while in recurrent cases, a low copper diet coupled with 1 g penicillamine had the highest median OS (18.5 months). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in OS or progression-free survival (PFS) of newly diagnosed or recurrent gliomas.
CONCLUSION
While nutritional adjuncts may offer a therapeutic benefit in the treatment of glioma, more human subject research is needed to derive meaningful conclusions.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Glioma; Progression-Free Survival; Brain Neoplasms
PubMed: 37390567
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107853 -
International Immunopharmacology Mar 2021Pemphigus encompasses a rare heterogeneous group of autoimmune blistering diseases characterized by cutaneous and/or mucosal blistering. Multiple factors, such as some...
Pemphigus encompasses a rare heterogeneous group of autoimmune blistering diseases characterized by cutaneous and/or mucosal blistering. Multiple factors, such as some specific types of drugs, have been found to be involved in the induction of pemphigus. Here, we have designed a systematic review by searching PubMed/Medline and Embase databases to find the drugs, involved in pemphigus induction and exacerbation (updated on 19 August 2019). From 1856 initially found articles, 134 studies (198 patients; 170 patients in the drug-induced patients and 28 in exacerbation group) have been included. Regarding drug-induced cases, the mean age was 57.19 ± 16.9-year-old (ranged 8-105), and patients had developed pemphigus within a mean of 154.27 days. Pemphigus vulgaris (38.9%), pemphigus foliaceus (33.5%), and paraneoplastic pemphigus (3.6%) were the most common subtypes. Furthermore, penicillamine (33.1%), captopril (7.7%), and bucillamine (6.5%) were the most reported drugs related to pemphigus induction; penicillamine was associated with the most persistent disease. Regardless of disease subtype, cutaneous, mucocutaneous, and mucosal involvements were reported in 68.6%, 30.1%, and 1.3% of patients, respectively. In total, the IgG deposition in the pathological studies, being positive for autoreactive antibodies in the serum against desmoglein 3 (Dsg3), and desmoglein 1 (Dsg1), were reported in 93%, 34.9%, and 72.7% of reported patients, respectively. Regarding the management of such patients, in 75% of healed cases, treatment (mainly transient systemic and topical corticosteroids and/or azathioprine) was needed besides stopping the probable pemphigus-inducing culprit drug, while drug cessation was enough to control the disease in 25%. As the outcomes, the lesions in 129 of 147 (87.8%) patients had been healed, while in 18 (12.2%), no healing was reported; fifteen out of 18 had died. In conclusion, some specific groups of treatments can induce pemphigus, including penicillamine, captopril, and bucillamine; despite the similar clinical and pathological manifestations to classical pemphigus, most of the cases are less severe and have a better prognosis.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antihypertensive Agents; Antirheumatic Agents; Captopril; Cysteine; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Pemphigus; Penicillamine
PubMed: 33418246
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107299 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2000To estimate the short-term effects of D-penicillamine for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To estimate the short-term effects of D-penicillamine for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group's trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (issue 3, 2000) and Medline up to and including August 2000 and Embase from 1988-2000. We also carried out a handsearch of the reference lists of the trials retrieved from the electronic search.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials comparing D-penicillamine against placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The methodological quality of the trials was assessed independently by two reviewers (CS, EB) and checked by a third (MS) using a validated quality assessment tool (Jadad 1996). Rheumatoid arthritis outcome measures were extracted from the publications for the six-month endpoint and stratified according to D-penicillamine dosages: low (<500mg/day), moderate (500 to <1000mg/day) and high (1000 mg/day or greater). Data was abstracted by one reviewer and checked by a second (CS, MS). The pooled analysis was performed using the standardized mean difference for joint counts, pain and global assessments. The weighted mean difference was used for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Toxicity was evaluated with pooled odds ratios for withdrawals and adverse reactions. A chi-square test was used to assess heterogeneity among trials. Fixed effects models were used throughout, since no statistical heterogeneity was found.
MAIN RESULTS
Six trials were identified, with 425 patients randomized to D-penacillamine and 258 to placebo. A statistically significant benefit was observed for D-penicillamine when compared to placebo for all three-dose ranges and for most outcome measures including: tender joint counts, pain, physician's global assessments and ESR. The standardized weighted mean differences between treatment and placebo in moderate doses were -0.51 [95% CI -0.88, -0.14] for tender joint counts, -0.56 (95% CI -0.87, -0.26) for pain and -0.97 (95% CI -1.25, -0.70) for global assessment. The difference for ESR was -10.6 mm/hr. Similar results were observed for the higher dose group. Total withdrawals were significantly higher in the moderate and high dosage D-penicillamine groups (OR=1.63 and 2.13 respectively), mostly due to increased adverse reactions (OR = 2.60 and 4.95 respectively), including renal and hematological abnormalities.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
D-penicillamine appears to have a clinically and statistically significant benefit on the disease activity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Its efficacy appears to be similar to that of other disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), but with a significantly higher toxicity. Its effects on long-term functional status and radiological progression are not clear from this review.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Penicillamine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 11034719
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001460 -
Liver International : Official Journal... Nov 2019Wilson disease (WD) is a rare disorder of copper metabolism. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the comparative effectiveness and safety of common... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Wilson disease (WD) is a rare disorder of copper metabolism. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the comparative effectiveness and safety of common treatments of WD.
METHODS
We included WD patients of any age or stage and the study drugs D-penicillamine, zinc salts, trientine and tetrathiomolybdate. The control could be placebo, no treatment or any other treatment. We included prospective, retrospective, randomized and non-randomized studies. We searched Medline and Embase via Ovid, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and screened reference lists of included articles. Where possible, we applied random-effects meta-analyses.
RESULTS
The 23 included studies reported on 2055 patients and mostly compared D-penicillamine to no treatment, zinc, trientine or succimer. One study compared tetrathiomolybdate and trientine. Post-decoppering maintenance therapy was addressed in one study only. Eleven of 23 studies were of low quality. When compared to no treatment, D-penicillamine was associated with a lower mortality (odds ratio 0.013; 95% CI 0.0010 to 0.17). When compared to zinc, there was no association with mortality (odds ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.16 to 3.40) and prevention or amelioration of clinical symptoms (odds ratio 0.84; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.48). Conversely, D-penicillamine may have a greater impact on side effects and treatment discontinuations than zinc.
CONCLUSIONS
There are some indications that zinc is safer than D-penicillamine therapy while being similarly effective in preventing or reducing hepatic or neurological WD symptoms. Study quality was low warranting cautious interpretation of our findings.
Topics: Chelating Agents; Copper; Hepatolenticular Degeneration; Humans; Liver; Molybdenum; Penicillamine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Trientine; Zinc
PubMed: 31206982
DOI: 10.1111/liv.14179 -
Journal of Nephrology Mar 2024Cystinuria is a rare genetic kidney stone disease, with no cure. Current treatments involve lowering urinary cystine levels and increasing cystine solubility. This... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cystinuria is a rare genetic kidney stone disease, with no cure. Current treatments involve lowering urinary cystine levels and increasing cystine solubility. This systematic review evaluates the available literature regarding non-surgical interventions for cystinuria.
METHODS
Key electronic databases were searched for studies that described the clinical management of cystinuria with high diuresis, alkalinizing agents and thiol-based drugs that were published between 2000 and 2022. Observational studies were included if they contained clinical investigation with at least one previous or current episode of cystine stones, urine cystine levels > 250 mg/L and patients being managed with urinary dilution, alkalinizing agents or other pharmacological agents. All included studies were assessed for study design, patient characteristics and outcomes. A qualitative and critical analysis was performed whereby study quality was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Two authors performed the quality assessment and excluded the studies with a low MINORS score.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies met the review inclusion and quality criteria. Of the fourteen studies, two reported treatment using alkalinizing agents, six reported treatment using thiol-based drugs, and six reported combination treatment using alkalinizing agents and thiol-based drugs. These studies indicated that first-line therapies, including high fluid intake and urinary alkalinization, increased urine volume to > 3 L/day and urinary pH > 7.0, and were associated with reduced urinary cystine levels and cystine stone formation. Second-line therapy with cystine-binding thiol drugs, such as tiopronin and D-penicillamine, reduced urinary cystine levels, cystine crystal volume and increased cystine solubility, resulting in decreased cystine stone formation and stone recurrence rate. Further, combined intervention with alkalinizing agents and thiol-based drugs synergistically reduced stone recurrence.
CONCLUSION
Cystinuria treatment may require a combined approach of high diuresis, alkalinization and pharmacological interventions with regular monitoring of urinary pH, cystine levels, cystine crystal volume and solubility. However, poor adherence to treatment is relatively frequent, hence the pressing urgency for improved therapies and treatments.
Topics: Cystinuria; Humans; Cystine; Sulfhydryl Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Diuresis
PubMed: 37957454
DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01795-6 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2012Arthritis remains a relatively infrequent complication of cystic fibrosis, but is a cause of significant morbidity when it does occur. Two distinct types of arthritis... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Arthritis remains a relatively infrequent complication of cystic fibrosis, but is a cause of significant morbidity when it does occur. Two distinct types of arthritis are described in cystic fibrosis: cystic fibrosis-related arthropathy and hypertrophic osteoarthropathy. Management of arthritis in people with cystic fibrosis is uncertain and complex because of the underlying disease and its treatment.
OBJECTIVES
To review the effectiveness and safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the management of arthritis related to cystic fibrosis in adults and children.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database handsearches of relevant journal and abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of most recent search: 10 July 2012.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials which compared the efficacy and safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (e.g. methotrexate, gold, sulfasalazine, penicillamine, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine and newer agents such as biologic disease modifying agents and monoclonal antibodies) with each other, with no treatment or with placebo for cystic fibrosis-related arthropathy or hypertrophic osteoarthropathy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
No relevant studies were identified.
MAIN RESULTS
No studies were included in this review.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Although it is generally recognised that cystic fibrosis-related arthritis can be episodic and resolve spontaneously, treatment with analgesics and anti-inflammatory agents may be needed. But when episodic symptoms progress to persistent disease, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs may be needed to limit the course of the disease. It is disappointing that no randomised controlled trials to rigorously evaluate these drugs could be found. This systematic review has identified the need for a well-designed adequately powered randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the management of cystic fibrosis-related arthropathy and hypertrophic osteoarthropathy in adults and children with cystic fibrosis. However, given the infrequency of cystic fibrosis-related arthritis and the range of symptoms and severity, randomised controlled trials may not be feasible and well-designed non-randomised observational studies may be more appropriate. Studies should also better define the two conditions.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis; Cystic Fibrosis; Humans
PubMed: 22972107
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007336.pub3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2004D-penicillamine is used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis due to its hepatic copper decreasing and immunomodulatory potentials. The results from randomised... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
D-penicillamine is used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis due to its hepatic copper decreasing and immunomodulatory potentials. The results from randomised clinical trials have been inconsistent.
OBJECTIVES
To systematically review the beneficial and harmful effects of D-penicillamine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We identified trials through electronic searches of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (September 2003), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2003), EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2003), The Chinese Biomedical CD Database (January 1979 to August 2003), and LILACS (1982 to 2003); through manual searches of bibliographies; and by contacting authors of the trials and pharmaceutical companies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised clinical trials comparing D-penicillamine with placebo/no intervention or other control intervention irrespective of language, year of publication, and publication status.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the trials and extracted data, validated by a third reviewer. The primary outcomes were 1) mortality and 2) a combination of those who died or underwent liver transplantation. We analysed dichotomous outcomes as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) by a fixed effect model and a random effects model. We investigated sources of heterogeneity by subgroup analyses and tested the robustness of our findings by sensitivity analyses.
MAIN RESULTS
We included seven trials randomising 706 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. D-penicillamine compared with placebo/no intervention tended to increase mortality (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.64, fixed; RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.50, random). However, there was substantial heterogeneity. No significant differences were detected regarding the risks of mortality or liver transplantation, pruritus, liver complications, progression of liver histological stage, or the levels of liver biochemical variables (except alanine aminotransferase). D-penicillamine versus placebo/no intervention significantly increased the risk of adverse events (RR 3.11, 95% CI 2.33 to 4.16, fixed; RR 4.18, 95% CI 1.38 to 12.69, random).
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS
D-penicillamine did not appear to reduce the risk of mortality, but significantly increased the occurrences of adverse events in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. We do not support the use of D-penicillamine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
Topics: Chelating Agents; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; Penicillamine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 15495127
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004789.pub2