-
International Journal of Impotence... May 2016The emerging of intracavernosal injection (ICI) of vasoactive materials was a major breakthrough in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). However, the current... (Review)
Review
The emerging of intracavernosal injection (ICI) of vasoactive materials was a major breakthrough in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). However, the current state and future direction of ICI role in the armamentarium of diagnosis, prevention and treatment of ED are not well defined. The aim of this study was to address the current place of ICI in the armamentarium of ED diagnosis and treatment. An English-language MEDLINE review for the utilization of 'intracavernosal injection & erectile dysfunction' was performed from 1990 to present time. Four hundred forty-eight articles were analyzed and classified according to the current utilization of ICI in the following conditions; diagnosis of ED, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5I) non-responders, diabetes, post radical prostatectomy (RP), stem cells and gene therapy, new intracavernosal drugs, adverse effects and couple satisfaction. This paper is not a standard systematic review; it is eventually a literature review of original peer-reviewed manuscripts and clinical trials reported in Medline. The comprehensive analyses of all the reviewed data were not possible as the level of evidence for utility of ICI in each topic was not available. Current date have established the role of ICI of vasoactive materials as a very common alternative domain in treatment of severe ED particularly in diabetic patients, post-RP, PDE5I non-responders. Further, new studies have denoted the potential future role of intracavernosal treatment for ED in the era of stem cells and gene therapy. ICI of vasoactive material continues to be a highly effective and safe treatment tool for men with wide varieties of ED etiologies. Several experimental and clinical studies are currently investigating new ICI materials. Hopefully in the near future, we might witness evolved molecules and innovative strategies that could help to treat ED patients with different etiologies.
Topics: Diabetes Complications; Erectile Dysfunction; Female; Humans; Injections; Male; Patient Satisfaction; Penile Erection; Penis; Personal Satisfaction; Vasodilator Agents
PubMed: 27076113
DOI: 10.1038/ijir.2016.14 -
Archives of Internal Medicine Jun 2002To determine the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To determine the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction.
DATA SOURCES
The MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, Current Contents, and Cochrane Library databases (January 1, 1995, through December 31, 2000); bibliographies of retrieved articles and review articles; conference proceedings abstracts; the Food and Drug Administration Web site; and the manufacturer.
STUDY SELECTION
Trials were eligible if they included men with erectile dysfunction, compared sildenafil with control, were randomized, were of at least 7 days' duration, and assessed clinically relevant outcomes.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two reviewers independently evaluated study quality and extracted data in a standardized fashion.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Twenty-seven trials (6659 men) met the inclusion criteria. In results pooled from 14 parallel-group, flexible as-needed dosing trials, sildenafil was more likely than placebo to lead to successful sexual intercourse, with a higher percentage of successful intercourse attempts (57% vs 21%; weighted mean difference, 33.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 29.2-38.2; 2283 men) and a greater percentage of men experiencing at least 1 intercourse success during treatment (83% vs 45%; relative benefit increase, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.7-1.9; 2205 men). In data pooled from 6 parallel-group, fixed-dose trials, efficacy appeared slightly greater at higher doses. Treatment response appeared to vary between patient subgroups, although relative to placebo, sildenafil significantly improved erectile function in all evaluated subgroups. In trials with parallel-group design and flexible dosing, men randomized to receive sildenafil were less likely than those receiving placebo to drop out for any reason and no more likely to drop out due to an adverse event or laboratory abnormality. Specific adverse events with sildenafil included flushing (12%), headache (11%), dyspepsia (5%), and visual disturbances (3%); all adverse events were significantly less likely to occur with placebo. Sildenafil was not significantly associated with serious cardiovascular events or death.
CONCLUSIONS
Sildenafil improves erectile function and is generally well tolerated. Treatment response seems to vary between patient subgroups, although sildenafil has greater efficacy than placebo in all evaluated subgroups.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dyspepsia; Erectile Dysfunction; Flushing; Headache; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Penile Erection; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors; Piperazines; Purines; Severity of Illness Index; Sexual Behavior; Sildenafil Citrate; Sulfones; Vasodilator Agents; Vision Disorders
PubMed: 12076233
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.12.1349 -
The Journal of Sexual Medicine Nov 2008Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) hydrolyses cyclic guanylate monophosphate (cGMP) specifically to 5' GMP. PDE5 inhibitors were a breakthrough medication that addressed a... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) hydrolyses cyclic guanylate monophosphate (cGMP) specifically to 5' GMP. PDE5 inhibitors were a breakthrough medication that addressed a previously unfulfilled medical need. They promoted vascular relaxation in the corpora cavernosa and penile erection during sexual stimulation. Sildenafil, vardenafil, and tadalafil were approved then introduced as effective treatments for male erectile dysfunction. This impact has stimulated academic, clinical, and industrial research.
AIM
To highlight the nonerectogenic beneficial uses of oral PDE5 inhibitors.
METHOD
A systematic review of published studies in this affair based on a Pubmed and medical subject heading databases search of all concerned articles.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Demonstrated beneficial as well as applicable uses of oral PDE5 inhibitors.
RESULTS
As chemical molecules, these drugs were shown to exert potential nonerectogenic beneficial effects. They showed efficacy as a useful adjunct in the management of pulmonary hypertension. Additional uses were extended to different utilities: essential hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, gastrointestinal disorders, endothelial dysfunction, female sexual dysfunction, genital blood flow, exercise capacity, Raynaud's phenomenon, sperm motility, etc.
CONCLUSION
Exploring PDE5 inhibitors for their possible medical applications in diverse specialties seems to be beneficial in making use of these molecules for the welfare of humanity.
Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cystic Fibrosis; Eisenmenger Complex; Erectile Dysfunction; Female Urogenital Diseases; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Male; Male Urogenital Diseases; Neoplasms; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors; Retinal Diseases; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; Skin Diseases
PubMed: 18761597
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00983.x -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2007Psychotropic drugs are associated with sexual dysfunction. Symptoms may concern penile erection, lubrication, orgasm, libido, sexual arousal or overall sexual... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Psychotropic drugs are associated with sexual dysfunction. Symptoms may concern penile erection, lubrication, orgasm, libido, sexual arousal or overall sexual satisfaction.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the effects of different strategies (e.g. dose reduction, drug holidays, adjunctive medication, switching to another drug) for treatment of sexual dysfunction due to antipsychotic therapy.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (June 2006), the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1966-8/2005), PsycLIT (1974-8/2005), EMBASE (1980-8/2005) and references of all identified studies for further trials. We contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies and authors of trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all relevant randomised controlled trials involving people with schizophrenia and sexual dysfunction.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Working independently, we extracted data. For dichotomous data we calculated random effects odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data we calculated weighted mean differences on the basis of a random effects model. We analysed crossover trials under consideration of correlation of paired measures.
MAIN RESULTS
Currently this review includes two pioneering crossover studies (total n=42 men, duration 2-3 weeks). They reported significantly more erections sufficient for penetration when receiving sildenafil compared with when receiving placebo (n=32, WMD 3.20 CI 1.83 to 4.57), a greater mean duration of erections (n=32, WMD 1.18 CI 0.52 to 1.84) and frequency of satisfactory intercourse (n=32, WMD 2.84 CI 1.61 to 4.07). The second trial found no evidence for selegiline as symptomatic treatment for antipsychotic-induced sexual dysfunction compared with placebo (n=10, WMD change on Aizenberg's sexual functioning scale -0.40 CI -3.95 to 3.15).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We are not confident that crossover studies are appropriate for this participant group. Sildenafil may be a useful option in the treatment of antipsychotic-induced sexual dysfunction in men with schizophrenia, but this conclusion is based only on one small short trial. Further well designed, conducted and reported trials are urgently needed.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Erectile Dysfunction; Female; Humans; Male; Piperazines; Purines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Selegiline; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; Sildenafil Citrate; Sulfones; Vasodilator Agents
PubMed: 17253492
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003546.pub2 -
Spinal Cord Aug 2006Systematic review. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
OBJECTIVE
To review sexuality in persons with spinal cord injuries (SCIs), and to report the effectiveness of erectile interventions.
METHODS
Reports from six databases (1966-2003), selected annual proceedings (1997-2002) and manufacturer's information were screened against eligibility criteria. Included reports were abstracted and data pooled from case-series reports regarding intracavernous injections and sildenafil.
RESULTS
From 2127 unique reports evaluated, 49 were included. Male sexual dysfunction was addressed in these reports of several interventions (behavioural therapy, topical agents, intraurethral alprosatadil, intracavernous injections, vacuum tumescence devices, penile implants, sacral stimulators and oral medication). Penile injections resulted in successful erectile function in 90% (95% CI: 83%, 97%) of men. Sildenafil resulted in 79% (95% CI: 68%, 90%) success; the difference in efficacy was not statistically significant. Five case-series reports involving 363 participants with penile implants demonstrated a high satisfaction rate, but a 10% complication rate.
CONCLUSIONS
A large body of evidence addressing sexuality in males focuses on erection. Penile injection, sildenafil and vacuum devices generally obviate the need for penile implants to address erectile dysfunction. Interventions may positively affect sexual activity in the short term. Long-term sexual adjustment and holistic approaches beyond erections remain to be studied. Rigorous study design and reporting, using common outcome measures, will facilitate higher quality research. This will positively impact patient care.
SPONSORSHIP
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2101 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Male; Prevalence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Spinal Cord Injuries; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 16317419
DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101880 -
World Journal of Urology Jan 2017The objective was to evaluate high-level evidence studies of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for urological disorders. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The objective was to evaluate high-level evidence studies of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for urological disorders.
METHODS
We included randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes of ESWT in urology. Literature search on trials published in English using EMBASE, Medline and PubMed was carried out. The systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
We identified 10 trials on 3 urological indications. Two of 3 trials on Peyronie's disease (PD) involving 238 patients reported improvement in pain; however, no clinical significant changes in penile deviation and plaque size were observed. Four studies on erectile dysfunction (ED) including 337 participants were included. Using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) and erectile hardness scale (EHS) data suggested a significant positive effect of ESWT in phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE-5i) responders in 2 of 4 trials and 3 of 4 trials, respectively. Three studies on chronic pelvic pain (CPP) engaging 200 men reported positive changes in National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). There was considerable heterogeneity between trials both with regard to treatment techniques and outcome measures, making it difficult to compare results.
CONCLUSIONS
ESWT may resolve pain in PD patients, while evidence for reducing curvature and plaques size is poor. Effects of ESWT on IIEF in ED patients are inconsistent; however, data on EHS does imply that the treatment potentially may recover natural erection in PDE-5i responders. ESWT seems to be able to resolve pain in CPP patients in the short term. In all three disease entities, long-term outcome data are still warranted.
Topics: Chronic Pain; Erectile Dysfunction; Female; High-Energy Shock Waves; Humans; Male; Pelvic Pain; Penile Induration; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27108421
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1834-2 -
Sexual Medicine Reviews Jul 2016Despite improvements in the care of patients after spinal cord injury (SCI), permanent impairment of locomotion, sensation, and autonomic function remains a major... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Despite improvements in the care of patients after spinal cord injury (SCI), permanent impairment of locomotion, sensation, and autonomic function remains a major hurdle. After the acute stage of injury, recovering sexual function is a high priority.
AIM
To review the efficacy of intracavernous injections (ICIs) in men with SCI and to identify prognostic factors affecting the efficacy of ICIs in this population.
METHODS
Systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed-Medline, Embase, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. The literature search was restricted to articles published in English, French, and Spanish up to November 2014 using the key words alprostadil, papaverine, moxisylite, alpha-blocking agent, phentolamine, intracavernous injection, spinal cord injuries, paraplegia, quadriplegia, and erectile dysfunction. Studies involving patients with SCI and erectile dysfunction treated with ICIs of alprostadil, papaverine, and α-blocking agents, including retrospective and prospective cohorts, population studies, and randomized controlled trials, were included.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
Overall response rate to ICI for erectile dysfunction in patients with SCI.
RESULTS
Of 283 studies identified, 23 involved 713 patients with SCI. ICIs resulted in successful erections in 88% of patients (n = 713, 95% CI = 83%-92%). Erections were obtained in 93% of patients (n = 101, 95% CI = 83%-99%) with the combination of papaverine and phentolamine, in 91% (n = 274, 95% CI = 78%-97%) with papaverine alone, and in 80% (n = 119, 95% CI = 64%-90%) with alprostadil. Type of injected drug, doses, level of injury (complete or incomplete), extent of injury, age, time since injury, and persistence or transience of erections were evaluated, but statistical analysis could not identify specific factors predictive of a response to ICI.
CONCLUSION
ICIs are an effective treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with SCI. No predictive factor for efficacy could be identified. Studies comparing the response to ICI in upper vs lower motor neuron lesions could improve our understanding of ICI failure.
Topics: Alprostadil; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Male; Moxisylyte; Papaverine; Penile Erection; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Cord Injuries; Vasodilator Agents
PubMed: 27871959
DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.02.005 -
International Journal of Impotence... Aug 2022Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a major global health burden commonly observed in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Although renal transplantation improves the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a major global health burden commonly observed in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Although renal transplantation improves the problem in some patients, it persists in ≈20-50% of recipients. Studies regarding the effects of kidney transplantation on ED present contradictory findings. We performed a systematic review to summarise the effects of kidney transplantation on ED. A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases in April 2020. We included all prospective studies that investigated the pre and posttransplant international index of erectile function (IIEF-5) scores in recipients with ED. Data search in PubMed and Google Scholar produced 1326 articles; eight were systematically reviewed with a total of 448 subjects. Meta-analysis of IIEF-5 scores showed significant improvements between pre and post transplantation. Our findings confirm that renal transplantation improves erectile function. Furthermore, transplantation also increases testosterone level. However, the evidence is limited because of the small number of studies. Further studies are required to investigate the effects of renal transplantation on erectile function.
Topics: Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Penile Erection; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 34103695
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-021-00419-6 -
Sao Paulo Medical Journal = Revista... Sep 2006Sexual dysfunction frequently occurs in patients with schizophrenia under antipsychotic therapy, and the presence of sexual side effects may affect compliance. The aim... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Sexual dysfunction frequently occurs in patients with schizophrenia under antipsychotic therapy, and the presence of sexual side effects may affect compliance. The aim of this study was to review and describe clinical findings relating to the appropriate management of such dysfunctions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The research was carried out through Medline (from 1966 to March 2005), PsycInfo (from 1974 to March 2005), and Cochrane Library (from 1965 to March 2005) and included any kind of study, from case reports to randomized trials.
RESULTS
The most common sexual dysfunctions found in the literature were libido decrease, difficulties in achieving and maintaining erection, ejaculatory dysfunction, orgasmic dysfunction, and menstrual irregularities. Thirteen papers were found: eight of them were open-label studies, four were descriptions of cases, and only one was a randomized clinical trial. All of them were short-term and had small sample sizes. The agents used were: bromocriptine, cabergoline, cyproheptadine, amantadine, shakuyaku-kanzo-to, sildenafil and selegiline.
DISCUSSION
There was no evidence that those agents had proper efficacy in treating the antipsychotic-induced sexual dysfunction. An algorithm for managing sexual dysfunction induced by antipsychotics is suggested as a support for clinical decisions. Since the outcome from schizophrenia treatment is strongly related to compliance with the antipsychotics, prevention of sexual dysfunction is better than its treatment, since there is a scarcity of data available regarding the efficacy of intervention to deal with these problems.
Topics: Algorithms; Antipsychotic Agents; Dopamine Agonists; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Libido; Male; Menstruation Disturbances; Orgasm; Penile Erection; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors; Schizophrenia; Serotonin Antagonists; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological
PubMed: 17262163
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-31802006000500012 -
International Journal of Impotence... Jan 2022The aim of this study is to present a summary of current evidence concerning the various treatments in the management of penile rehabilitation after radical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The aim of this study is to present a summary of current evidence concerning the various treatments in the management of penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy (RP) and provide recommendations for future research. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from electronic databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from inception through March 2020 with no limitation to language. Comparable data from each study were combined in a meta-analysis where possible, otherwise data were synthesized narratively. The data analysis was completed by Review Manager version 5.3. A total of 39 RCTs were included in this study. At present, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) remain the first-line treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) after RP. Compared with the placebo group, patients in regular PDE5is group (mean difference (MD): 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.69-4.44; p < 0.0001) and on demand group (MD: 3.92; 95% CI: 2.95-4.88; p < 0.00001) had a significantly higher mean Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) scores within 3 months after RP. As for the proportion of IIEF-EF ≥ 22, patients in regular PDE5is group and on demand PDE5is group had significantly higher proportion than those in placebo group 6 months after RP, and the odds ratios were 1.87 (95% CI: 1.32-2.66; p = 0.0005) and 2.17 (95% CI: 1.20-3.93; p = 0.01), respectively. No significant difference was observed between regular PDE5is group and on demand group regardless of mean IIEF-EF score or the proportion of IIEF-EF ≥ 22. Intracorporeal injection therapy seemed to have similar efficacy to PDE5is. The International Index of Erectile Function-5 items (IIEF-5) scores were significantly higher in vacuum constriction devices group than control group at 6-9 months after RP (MD: 6.70, 95% CI: 2.30-11.10, p = 0.003) with great between-study heterogeneity (p = 0.06, I = 72%). The other therapeutics including low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy, statin therapy, psychotherapy interventions, and pelvic floor muscle training plus electrical stimulation showed certain improvement on erectile function. We found that the combination therapy showed certain advantages over monotherapy. Currently, PDE5is-based combination therapy remains the mainstream treatment for ED after RP. Intracorporeal injection therapy and vacuum therapy could be served as alternative treatments if PDE5is are ineffective and contraindicated.
Topics: Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Male; Penile Erection; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors; Prostate; Prostatectomy
PubMed: 33099581
DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-00364-w