-
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Apr 2022To estimate the incremental yield of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array over karyotype and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of SNP array as a stand-alone test... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the incremental yield of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array over karyotype and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of SNP array as a stand-alone test versus SNP array with karyotype in detecting chromosomal abnormalities for prenatal diagnosis in women with an abnormal fetal ultrasound.
STUDY DESIGN
Studies in which SNP array and karyotype had been used for diagnosing chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with abnormal ultrasound findings were included. A systematic search of relevant studies published in the English language in EMBASE, PubMed, CENTRAL, CDSR (Cochrane database of systematic reviews), SCOPUS and Web of science between 1996 and May 2020 was performed. Primary outcome was incremental yield of SNP array over karyotype (number of patients with abnormalities detected by SNP array over number of patients with normal karyotype). Other outcomes included diagnostic accuracy of SNP array alone versus SNP array and karyotype for prenatal diagnosis. Pooled sensitivities, specificities, and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented.
RESULT(S)
Seven studies were included. The incremental yield of SNP array over karyotype was 8% (95% Confidence interval, CI 4-12%) while incremental yield of karyotype over SNP array in foetus with abnormal ultrasound was 0% (95% CI 0-1%). The agreement between SNP array and karyotype was 92%. The variant of unknown significance rates ranged between 4 and 8 %. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of SNP array versus SNP array and karyotype was 0.97 (95% CI 0.92-0.99) and 1.00 (95% CI1.00-1.00), respectively.
CONCLUSION(S)
SNP array provides additional information on chromosomal abnormalities over and above conventional karyotype. When used as a stand-alone test, SNP array performs favourably as a diagnostic modality when compared against SNP array and karyotype for prenatal diagnosis with an abnormal fetal ultrasound.
Topics: Chromosome Aberrations; Female; Fetus; Humans; Karyotype; Karyotyping; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Pregnancy; Prenatal Diagnosis; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 35245714
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.02.011 -
European Urology Apr 2016The role of percutaneous renal tumour biopsy (RTB) remains controversial due to uncertainties regarding its diagnostic accuracy and safety. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
The role of percutaneous renal tumour biopsy (RTB) remains controversial due to uncertainties regarding its diagnostic accuracy and safety.
OBJECTIVE
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the safety and accuracy of percutaneous RTB for the diagnosis of malignancy, histologic tumour subtype, and grade.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies providing data on diagnostic accuracy and complications of percutaneous core biopsy (CB) or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of renal tumours. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of malignancy. The Cohen kappa coefficient (κ) was estimated for the analysis of histotype/grade concordance between diagnosis on RTB and surgical specimen. Risk of bias assessment was performed (QUADAS-2).
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
A total of 57 studies recruiting 5228 patients were included. The overall median diagnostic rate of RTB was 92%. The sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic CBs and FNAs were 99.1% and 99.7%, and 93.2% and 89.8%, respectively. A good (κ = 0.683) and a fair (κ = 0.34) agreement were observed between histologic subtype and Fuhrman grade on RTB and surgical specimen, respectively. A very low rate of Clavien ≥ 2 complications was reported. Study limitations included selection and differential-verification bias.
CONCLUSIONS
RTB is safe and has a high diagnostic yield in experienced centres. Both CB and FNA have good accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy and histologic subtype, with better performance for CB. The accuracy for Fuhrman grade is fair. Overall, the quality of the evidence was moderate. Prospective cohort studies recruiting consecutive patients and using homogeneous reference standards are required.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We systematically reviewed the literature to assess the safety and diagnostic performance of renal tumour biopsy (RTB). The results suggest that RTB has good accuracy in diagnosing renal cancer and its subtypes, and it appears to be safe. However, the quality of evidence was moderate, and better quality studies are required to provide a more definitive answer.
Topics: Biopsy, Fine-Needle; Biopsy, Large-Core Needle; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Grading; Observer Variation; Predictive Value of Tests; Reproducibility of Results
PubMed: 26323946
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.072 -
Oral Radiology Jul 2024The recent impact of artificial intelligence in diagnostic services has been enormous. Machine learning tools offer an innovative alternative to diagnose cysts and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The recent impact of artificial intelligence in diagnostic services has been enormous. Machine learning tools offer an innovative alternative to diagnose cysts and tumors radiographically that pose certain challenges due to the near similar presentation, anatomical variations, and superimposition. It is crucial that the performance of these models is evaluated for their clinical applicability in diagnosing cysts and tumors.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was carried out on eminent databases for published studies between January 2015 and December 2022. Studies utilizing machine learning models in the diagnosis of odontogenic cysts or tumors using Orthopantomograms (OPG) or Cone Beam Computed Tomographic images (CBCT) were included. QUADAS-2 tool was used for the assessment of the risk of bias and applicability concerns. Meta-analysis was performed for studies reporting sufficient performance metrics, separately for OPG and CBCT.
RESULTS
16 studies were included for qualitative synthesis including a total of 10,872 odontogenic cysts and tumors. The sensitivity and specificity of machine learning in diagnosing cysts and tumors through OPG were 0.83 (95% CI 0.81-0.85) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.81-0.83) respectively. Studies utilizing CBCT noted a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.87-0.88) and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.87-0.89). Highest classification accuracy was 100%, noted for Support Vector Machine classifier.
CONCLUSION
The results from the present review favoured machine learning models to be used as a clinical adjunct in the radiographic diagnosis of odontogenic cysts and tumors, provided they undergo robust training with a huge dataset. However, the arduous process, investment, and certain ethical concerns associated with the total dependence on technology must be taken into account. Standardized reporting of outcomes for diagnostic studies utilizing machine learning methods is recommended to ensure homogeneity in assessment criteria, facilitate comparison between different studies, and promote transparency in research findings.
Topics: Humans; Machine Learning; Odontogenic Cysts; Odontogenic Tumors; Sensitivity and Specificity; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
PubMed: 38530559
DOI: 10.1007/s11282-024-00745-7 -
Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) Apr 2017Tissue diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) can be challenging. In the past, flexible bronchoscopy was commonly performed for this purpose but its diagnostic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Tissue diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) can be challenging. In the past, flexible bronchoscopy was commonly performed for this purpose but its diagnostic yield is suboptimal. This has led to the development of new bronchoscopic modalities such as radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS), electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) and virtual bronchoscopy (VB). We performed this meta-analysis using data from previously published R-EBUS studies, to determine its diagnostic yield and other performance characteristics. Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched for R-EBUS studies in September 2016. Diagnostic yield was calculated by dividing the number of successful diagnoses by the total number of lesions. Meta-analysis was performed using MedCalc (Version 16.8). Inverse variance weighting was used to aggregate diagnostic yield proportions across studies. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and Duval and Tweedie's test. 57 studies with a total of 7872 lesions were included in the meta-analysis. These were published between October 2002 and August 2016. Overall weighted diagnostic yield for R-EBUS was 70.6% (95% CI: 68-73.1%). The diagnostic yield was significantly higher for lesions >2 cm in size, malignant in nature and those associated with a bronchus sign on computerized tomography (CT) scan. Diagnostic yield was also higher when R-EBUS probe was within the lesion as opposed to being adjacent to it. Overall complication rate was 2.8%. This is the largest meta-analysis performed to date, assessing the performance of R-EBUS for diagnosing PPLs. R-EBUS has a high diagnostic yield (70.6%) with a very low complication rate.
Topics: Bronchi; Bronchoscopy; Endosonography; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Tumor Burden
PubMed: 28177181
DOI: 10.1111/resp.12980 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Feb 2014Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication of gastrointestinal surgery resulting in increased morbidity and mortality, poor function and predisposing to cancer... (Review)
Review
AIM
Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication of gastrointestinal surgery resulting in increased morbidity and mortality, poor function and predisposing to cancer recurrence. Earlier diagnosis and intervention can minimize systemic complications but is hindered by current diagnostic methods that are non-specific and often uninformative. The purpose of this paper is to review current developments in the field and to identify strategies for early detection and treatment of anastomotic leakage.
METHOD
A systematic literature search was performed using the MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. Search terms included 'anastomosis' and 'leak' and 'diagnosis' or 'detection' and 'gastrointestinal' or 'colorectal'. Papers concentrating on the diagnosis of gastrointestinal anastomotic leak were identified and further searches were performed by cross-referencing.
RESULTS
Computerized tomography CT scanning and water-soluble contrast studies are the current preferred techniques for diagnosing anastomotic leakage but suffer from variable sensitivity and specificity, have logistical constraints and may delay timely intervention. Intra-operative endoscopy and imaging may offer certain advantages, but the ability to predict anastomotic leakage is unproven. Newer techniques involve measurement of biomarkers for anastomotic leakage and have the potential advantage of providing cheap real-time monitoring for postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION
Current diagnostic tests often fail to diagnose anastomotic leak at an early stage that enables timely intervention and minimizes serious morbidity and mortality. Emerging technologies, based on detection of local biomarkers, have achieved proof of concept status but require further evaluation to determine whether they translate into improved patient outcomes. Further research is needed to address this important, yet relatively unrecognized, area of unmet clinical need.
Topics: Anastomotic Leak; Contrast Media; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Endoscopy; Humans; Intraoperative Period; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 23992097
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12411 -
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Jul 2009To evaluate the ability of the widely used ACR set of criteria (both list and tree format) to diagnose RA compared with expert opinion according to disease duration. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Sensitivity and specificity of the American College of Rheumatology 1987 criteria for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis according to disease duration: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the ability of the widely used ACR set of criteria (both list and tree format) to diagnose RA compared with expert opinion according to disease duration.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases. All articles reporting the prevalence of RA according to ACR criteria and expert opinion in cohorts of early (<1 year duration) or established (>1 year) arthritis were analysed to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of ACR 1987 criteria against the "gold standard" (expert opinion). A meta-analysis using a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was performed and pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated with confidence intervals.
RESULTS
Of 138 publications initially identified, 19 were analysable (total 7438 patients, 3883 RA). In early arthritis, pooled sensitivity and specificity of the ACR set of criteria were 77% (68% to 84%) and 77% (68% to 84%) in the list format versus 80% (72% to 88%) and 33% (24% to 43%) in the tree format. In established arthritis, sensitivity and specificity were respectively 79% (71% to 85%) and 90% (84% to 94%) versus 80% (71% to 85%) and 93% (86% to 97%). The SROC meta-analysis confirmed the statistically significant differences, suggesting that diagnostic performances of ACR list criteria are better in established arthritis.
CONCLUSION
The specificity of ACR 1987 criteria in early RA is low, and these criteria should not be used as diagnostic tools. Sensitivity and specificity in established RA are higher, which reflects their use as classification criteria gold standard.
Topics: Adult; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Disease Progression; Early Diagnosis; Humans; Reference Standards; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 18728049
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2008.093187 -
Academic Emergency Medicine : Official... Jan 2013Understanding history, physical examination, and ultrasonography (US) to diagnose extremity fractures compared with radiography has potential benefits of decreasing... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Understanding history, physical examination, and ultrasonography (US) to diagnose extremity fractures compared with radiography has potential benefits of decreasing radiation exposure, costs, and pain and improving emergency department (ED) resource management and triage time.
METHODS
The authors performed two electronic searches using PubMed and EMBASE databases for studies published between 1965 to 2012 using a strategy based on the inclusion of any patient presenting with extremity injuries suspicious for fracture who had history and physical examination and a separate search for US performed by an emergency physician (EP) with subsequent radiography. The primary outcome was operating characteristics of ED history, physical examination, and US in diagnosing radiologically proven extremity fractures. The methodologic quality of the studies was assessed using the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy tool (QUADAS-2).
RESULTS
Nine studies met the inclusion criteria for history and physical examination, while eight studies met the inclusion criteria for US. There was significant heterogeneity in the studies that prevented data pooling. Data were organized into subgroups based on anatomic fracture locations, but heterogeneity within the subgroups also prevented data pooling. The prevalence of fracture varied among the studies from 22% to 70%. Upper extremity physical examination tests have positive likelihood ratios (LRs) ranging from 1.2 to infinity and negative LRs ranging from 0 to 0.8. US sensitivities varied between 85% and 100%, specificities varied between 73% and 100%, positive LRs varied between 3.2 and 56.1, and negative LRs varied between 0 and 0.2.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with radiography, EP US is an accurate diagnostic test to rule in or rule out extremity fractures. The diagnostic accuracy for history and physical examination are inconclusive. Future research is needed to understand the accuracy of ED US when combined with history and physical examination for upper and lower extremity fractures.
Topics: Cohort Studies; Emergency Service, Hospital; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Incidence; Injury Severity Score; Lower Extremity; Male; Medical History Taking; Physical Examination; Point-of-Care Systems; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography, Doppler; Upper Extremity
PubMed: 23570473
DOI: 10.1111/acem.12058 -
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Dec 2023Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) accounts for over half of all gastroesophageal reflux cases and is characterized by reflux symptoms with pathologic acid exposure on pH... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) accounts for over half of all gastroesophageal reflux cases and is characterized by reflux symptoms with pathologic acid exposure on pH monitoring but no evidence of erosions on upper endoscopy. Ambulatory pH monitoring is limited by availability and patient tolerance. The utility of performing esophageal mucosal biopsies in diagnosing NERD is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the sensitivity of esophageal mucosal biopsies in diagnosing NERD.
METHODS
Data were obtained from Embase and Ovid MEDLINE from inception to April 2021. Studies were included if esophageal mucosal biopsies were taken and analyzed using conventional histopathologic analysis in symptomatic NERD patients. Relevant data was including histologic abnormalities and location of the biopsy. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated against healthy controls or those with functional heartburn.
RESULTS
The search yielded 2871 studies, of which 10 studies met our inclusion criteria and contained raw data. Histological abnormalities included histologic sum scores, papillary elongation, basal cell hyperplasia, and dilated intraepithelial spaces. When assessing for the presence of any abnormality, biopsies taken <3 cm from the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) had a pooled sensitivity of 0.71 (95% CI 0.64-0.77) and specificity of 0.64 (95% 0.54-0.73); however, analysis of individual histologic features such as the presence of eosinophils improved the sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS
Although esophageal mucosal biopsies had poor sensitivity at diagnosing NERD, biopsies taken within 3 cm of the LES had higher sensitivity when pathologists reported upon eosinophils and dilated intraepithelial spaces.
Topics: Humans; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Heartburn; Esophagitis, Peptic; Esophageal pH Monitoring; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
PubMed: 37448170
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14631 -
Journal of Affective Disorders Jul 2023Clinical prediction models have been widely used to screen and diagnose postpartum depression (PPD). This study systematically reviews and evaluates the risk of bias and... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Clinical prediction models have been widely used to screen and diagnose postpartum depression (PPD). This study systematically reviews and evaluates the risk of bias and the applicability of PPD prediction models.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in eight databases from inception to June 1, 2022. The literature was independently screened, and data were extracted by two investigators using the checklist for critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modeling studies (CHARMS). The risk of bias and applicability was assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).
RESULTS
After the screening, 12 studies of PPD risk prediction models were included, with the area under the ROC curve of the models ranging from 0.611 to 0.937. The most-reported predictors of PPD included several aspects, including prenatal mood disorders, endocrine and hormonal influences, psychosocial aspects, the influence of family factors, and somatic illness factors. The applicability of all studies was good. However, there was some bias, mainly due to inadequate outcome events, missing data not appropriately handled, lack of model performance assessment, and overfitting of the models.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and evaluation indicate that most present PPD prediction models have a high risk of bias during development and validation. Despite some models' predictive solid performance, the models' clinical practice rate is low. Therefore, future research should develop predictive models with excellent performance in all aspects and clinical applicability to better inform maternal medical decisions.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Depression, Postpartum; Forecasting; Prognosis; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37084958
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.026 -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Dec 2023For diagnosing left adrenal gland metastasis in lung cancer, clinical guidelines recommend to perform EUS, but EUS-B (EUS using an EBUS-scope) is increasingly being... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
For diagnosing left adrenal gland metastasis in lung cancer, clinical guidelines recommend to perform EUS, but EUS-B (EUS using an EBUS-scope) is increasingly being used. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of both procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We did a systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42023416205) and searched MEDLINE and EMBASE on 04-July-2023 for studies evaluating EUS and/or EUS-B in diagnosing left adrenal gland metastases in adults with (suspected) lung cancer. Outcomes were: (1) ability to visualize the left adrenal gland, (2) ability to sample (in those with successful visualization and in whom sampling was attempted), (3) ability to obtain adequate material (in those with successful sampling), (4) malignancy detection rate (in those with successful sampling), and (5) remaining risk of malignancy (in those with a negative EUS(-B)-FNA and undergoing a reference standard). We performed random-effects meta-analyses.
RESULTS
We included 19 studies (EUS: n = 11, EUS-B: n = 6, both: n = 2), covering 1712 patients. All studies had high (n = 18) or unclear (n = 1) risk of bias (QUADAS-2). Average ability to visualize the left adrenal gland was 0.94 (95 %CI 0.82-0.98; n = 7 studies). Average ability to sample was 1.00 (95 %CI 0.99-1.00; n = 9). Average ability to obtain adequate material was 0.96 (95 %CI 0.93-0.98; n = 18). Average malignancy detection rate was 0.42 (95 %CI 0.34-0.49; n = 18). Remaining risk of malignancy was 0.07 (95 %CI 0.04-0.12; n = 8). Ability to visualize was slightly higher for EUS (0.99; 95 %CI 0.90-1.00) than EUS-B (0.84; 95 %CI 0.70-0.92; p = 0.025), but the other performance characteristics were similar. No major complications were reported.
CONCLUSION
Both EUS and EUS-B have good performance and are safe for left adrenal gland analysis in patients with lung cancer, but the number of high-quality studies is limited and further well-constructed prospective studies are needed.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration; Endosonography; Sensitivity and Specificity; Adrenal Glands; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms
PubMed: 37827042
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107391