-
Annals of Palliative Medicine Sep 2021Surgery is the clinically preferred treatment for high perianal abscesses. Incision and seton drainage improve the cure rate and reduce recurrence. We aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Surgery is the clinically preferred treatment for high perianal abscesses. Incision and seton drainage improve the cure rate and reduce recurrence. We aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical effect and safety of incision and seton drainage in the treatment of high perianal abscess.
METHODS
China Knowledge Network (CNKI), WanFang database, VIP database, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched and all relevant Chinese and English language documents until July 2021were retrieved. All records that described randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of incision and seton drainage for the treatment of high perianal abscess were eligible. Documents that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated for bias using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk Evaluation Standard, and Revman5.4 software was used to analyze the data.
RESULTS
Fourteen RCTs were included. The results of nine studies showed that the clinical cure rate of the incision-seton group was higher than that of the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Seven studies showed that the wound healing time of the incision-seton group was shorter than that of the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Four studies showed that the visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the incision-seton group was lower than that of the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Five studies showed that the Wexner score of the incision-seton group was lower than that of the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Six studies showed that the formation rate of anal fistula in the incision-seton group was lower than that in the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Six studies demonstrated that the recurrence rate of abscess in the incision-seton group was lower than that in the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Seven studies showed that the incidence of adverse events in the incision-seton group was lower than that in the incision-drainage group (P<0.05). Five studies demonstrated that the length of stay in the incision-seton group was shorter than that of the incision-drainage group (P<0.05).
DISCUSSION
The choice of surgical methods in clinical research has always been controversial. The incision-seton method can effectively and safely treat high perianal abscess. However, the results of this meta-analysis still leave some gaps in the evidence. More large-sample, high-quality, and multi-center RCTs are needed.
Topics: Abscess; Anus Diseases; Drainage; Humans; Rectal Fistula; Recurrence
PubMed: 34628909
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-2229 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2010The perianal abscess is a common surgical problem. A third of perianal abscesses may manifest a fistula-in-ano which increases the risk of abscess recurrence requiring... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The perianal abscess is a common surgical problem. A third of perianal abscesses may manifest a fistula-in-ano which increases the risk of abscess recurrence requiring repeat surgical drainage. Treating the fistula at the same time as incision and drainage of the abscess may reduce the likelihood of recurrent abscess and the need for repeat surgery. However, this could affect sphincter function in some patients who may not have later developed a fistula-in-ano.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to review the available randomised controlled trial evidence comparing incision and drainage of perianal abscess with or without fistula treatment.
SEARCH STRATEGY
Randomised trials were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and reference lists of published papers and reviews.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Trials comparing outcome after fistula surgery with drainage of perianal abscess compared with drainage alone were included in the review.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The primary outcomes were recurrent or persistent abscess/fistula which may require repeat surgery and short-term and long-term incontinence. Secondary outcomes were duration of hospitalisation, duration of wound healing, postoperative pain, quality of life scores. For dichotomous variables, relative risks and their confidence intervals were calculated.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified six trials, involving 479 subjects, comparing incision and drainage of perianal abscess alone versus incision and drainage with fistula treatment. Metaanalysis showed a significant reduction in recurrence, persistent abscess/fistula or repeat surgery in favour of fistula surgery at the time of abscess incision and drainage (RR=0.13, 95% Confidence Interval of RR = 0.07-0.24). Transient manometric reduction in anal sphincter pressures, without clinical incontinence, may occur after treatment of low fistulae with abscess drainage. Incontinence at one year following drainage with fistula surgery was not statistically significant (pooled RR 3.06, 95% Confidence Interval 0.7-13.45) with heterogeneity demonstrable between the trials (Chi(2) =5.39,df=3, p=0.14, I(2) =44.4%).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The published evidence shows fistula surgery with abscess drainage significantly reduces recurrence or persistence of abscess/fistula, or the need for repeat surgery. There was no statistically significant evidence of incontinence following fistula surgery with abscess drainage. This intervention may be recommended in carefully selected patients.
Topics: Abscess; Anus Diseases; Cutaneous Fistula; Drainage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rectal Fistula; Secondary Prevention
PubMed: 20614450
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006827.pub2 -
Journal of Pediatric Surgery Jul 2023Perianal abscesses and anal fistulas are common. The principle of intention-to-treat has not been considered in previous systemic reviews. Thus, the comparison between... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Perianal abscesses and anal fistulas are common. The principle of intention-to-treat has not been considered in previous systemic reviews. Thus, the comparison between primary and post-recurrence management was confused, and the recommendation of primary treatment is obscure. The current study aims to identify the optimal initial treatment for pediatric patients.
METHODS
Using PRISMA guidelines, studies were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar without any language or study design restriction. The inclusion criteria include original articles or articles with original data, studies of management for a perianal abscess with or without anal fistula, and patient age of <18 years. Patients with local malignancy, Crohn's disease, or other underlying predisposing conditions were excluded. Studies without analyzing recurrence, case series of <5, and irrelevant articles were excluded in the screening stage. Of the 124 screened articles, 14 articles had no full texts or detailed information. Articles written in a language other than English or Mandarin were translated by Google Translation first and confirmed with native speakers. After the eligibility process, studies that compared identified primary managements were then included in the qualitative synthesis.
RESULTS
Thirty-one studies involving 2507 pediatric patients met the inclusion criteria. The study design consisted of two prospective case series of 47 patients and retrospective cohort studies. No randomized control trials were identified. Meta-analyses for recurrence after initial management were performed with a random-effects model. Conservative treatment and drainage revealed no difference (Odds ratio [OR], 1.222; 95% Confidential interval [CI]: 0.615-2.427, p = 0.567). Conservative management had a higher risk of recurrence than surgery without statistical significance (OR 0.278, 95% CI: 0.109-0.707, p = 0.007). Compared with incision/drainage, surgery can prevent recurrence remarkably (OR 4.360, 95% CI: 1.761-10.792, p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis of different approaches within conservative treatment and operation was not performed for lacking information.
CONCLUSION
Strong recommendations cannot be made due to the lack of prospective or randomized controlled studies. However, the current study based on real primary management supports initial surgical intervention for pediatric patients with perianal abscesses and anal fistula to prevent recurrence.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Type of study: Systemic review; Evidence level: Level II.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Humans; Abscess; Anus Diseases; Drainage; Rectal Fistula; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36894443
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.01.055 -
Ultraschall in Der Medizin (Stuttgart,... Jun 2017Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is a practical tool for assessing perianal inflammatory lesions. We systematically review its accuracy for detecting and classifying... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is a practical tool for assessing perianal inflammatory lesions. We systematically review its accuracy for detecting and classifying perianal fistulae and abscesses. The National Library of Medicine and Embase were searched for articles on TPUS for the assessment of idiopathic and Crohn's perianal fistulae and abscesses. Two reviewers independently reviewed eligible studies and rated them for quality using the QUADAS tool. The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of TPUS as measured by its sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) in detecting and classifying perianal fistulae, internal openings and perianal abscesses. We included 12 studies (565 patients). Overall, the methodological quality of the studies was suboptimal. 3 studies were retrospective and 4 showed significant risks of bias in the application of the reference standard. The sensitivity of TPUS in detecting perianal fistulae on a per-lesion basis was 98 % (95 % CI 96 - 100 %) and the PPV was 95 % (95 % CI 90 - 98 %). The detection of internal openings had a sensitivity of 91 % (95 % CI 84 - 97 %) with a PPV of 87 % (95 % CI 76 - 95 %). The classification of fistulae yielded a sensitivity of 92 % (95 % CI 85 - 97 %) and a PPV of 92 % (95 % CI 83 - 98 %). TPUS had a sensitivity of 86 % (95 % CI 67 - 99 %) and PPV of 90 % (95 % CI 76 - 99 %) in the detection of perianal abscesses. The current literature on TPUS illustrates good overall accuracy in the assessment of perianal fistulae and abscesses. However, many studies had methodological flaws suggesting that further research is required.
Topics: Abscess; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anus Diseases; Child; Child, Preschool; Endosonography; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Rectal Fistula; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 28399604
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-103954 -
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Oct 2022Perianal Crohn's disease (pCD) is a potentially severe phenotype of CD. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to estimate cumulative incidence, risk... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Perianal Crohn's disease (pCD) is a potentially severe phenotype of CD. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to estimate cumulative incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of pCD in population-based cohort studies.
METHODS
Through a systematic literature review through March 1, 2021, we identified population-based inception cohort studies reporting cumulative incidence of perianal disease (primarily abscess and/or fistula) in patients with CD. We estimated the cumulative incidence of pCD at presentation and 1-, 5-, and 10-year follow-up, and risk factors for perianal disease and outcomes including risk of major (bowel resection, proctectomy, ostomy) and minor perianal (incision and drainage, seton placement, etc.) surgery.
RESULTS
In 12 population-based studies, prevalence of pCD was 18.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.5%-27.0%) with 1-, 5-, and 10-year risk of perianal disease being 14.3% (95% CI, 7.9%-24.6%), 17.6% (95% CI, 11.3%-26.5%), and 18.9% (95% CI, 15.0%-23.4%), respectively. Approximately 11.5% of patients (95% CI, 6.7%-19.0%) had perianal disease at or before CD diagnosis. Colonic disease location and rectal involvement were associated with higher risk of pCD. Overall, 63.3% of patients (95% CI, 53.3-72.3) required minor perianal surgery and 6.4% of patients (95% CI, 1.8%-20.6%) required major abdominal surgery for pCD. Use of biologic therapy for pCD is common and has steadily increased throughout the years.
CONCLUSIONS
Approximately 1 in 5 patients with CD develops perianal disease within 10 years of CD diagnosis, including 11.5% who have perianal disease at presentation. Approximately two-thirds of patients require perianal surgery, with a smaller fraction requiring major abdominal surgery.
Topics: Cohort Studies; Crohn Disease; Humans; Incidence; Proctectomy; Rectal Fistula; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34792604
DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izab287 -
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of packing in the management of perianal abscesses.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons... Apr 2024Perianal abscesses are common presentations and reasons for emergency general surgery admissions. Management involves incision and drainage of the abscess and packing...
BACKGROUND
Perianal abscesses are common presentations and reasons for emergency general surgery admissions. Management involves incision and drainage of the abscess and packing the cavity with internal wound dressings. This meta-analysis aimed to assess in adults if packing an abscess or leaving it unpacked leads to a significant difference in the outcomes of pain on wound dressing, time to healing, rate of fistulation and abscess recurrence.
METHODS
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with participants aged 18 years or older that compared packing of perianal abscess cavities with no packing between 2002 and 2022 were searched for in December 2022 on OVID Medline and Embase, the CENTRAL register of trials, PubMed and Google Scholar. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted on the data extracted.
RESULTS
Three RCTs involving 490 patients were analysed for the outcomes of abscess recurrence and postoperative fistula formation; the data were not adequate to assess pain on dressing and time to healing. For unpacked versus packed, the pooled relative risk of abscess recurrence was 1.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.764, 3.29, =0.219) and for fistula formation 0.686 (95% CI 0.430, 1.09, =0.114). These results suggest there is no significant benefit to packing abscess cavities.
CONCLUSIONS
Analysis of the outcomes suggests there is no significant difference with regards to rates of abscess recurrence or fistula formation between the packed and unpacked groups; however, appropriately powered RCTs are required in this area to provide more primary evidence to inform best practice and clinical management.
PubMed: 38563064
DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0108 -
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery :... Jun 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies (NRSs) aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of two types of surgical interventions... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
This systematic review and meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies (NRSs) aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of two types of surgical interventions (respectively drainage alone and drainage with primary fistula treatment) for perianal abscesses (PAs) in children. Studies from 1992 to July 2022 were searched in 10 electronic databases. All relevant NRSs with available data which compared surgical drainage with or without primary fistula treatment were included. Patients with underlying diseases which led to abscess formation were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias and quality of the included studies. The outcomes were the healing rate, fistula formation rate, fecal incontinence, and wound healing duration. A total of 16 articles with 1,262 patients were considered suitable for the final meta-analysis. Primary fistula treatment was associated with a significantly higher healing rate when compared with incision and drainage alone (odds ratio [OR]: 5.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.04-8.22). This aggressive procedure for PA resulted in an 86% reduction in the fistula formation rate (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06-0.32). Limited data showed patients who underwent primary fistula treatment have a minor effect on postoperative fecal incontinence. Primary fistula treatment demonstrates a better clinical efficacy in promoting the healing rate and decreasing the formation of fistulas in PAs in children. The available evidence for a minor impact on anal function after this intervention is less strong.
Topics: Humans; Drainage; Child; Abscess; Rectal Fistula; Anus Diseases; Fecal Incontinence; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing
PubMed: 37023788
DOI: 10.1055/a-2070-3613 -
Annals of Gastroenterology 2024Managing complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (CD) remains challenging, despite current medical and surgical treatment approaches. Darvadstrocel, a therapy...
BACKGROUND
Managing complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (CD) remains challenging, despite current medical and surgical treatment approaches. Darvadstrocel, a therapy utilizing adipose-derived stem cells, shows promise in promoting tissue regeneration and healing, offering a novel and effective treatment for fistula management.
METHOD
A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus to identify studies involving patients with complex perianal fistulizing CD treated with darvadstrocel.
RESULTS
In total, 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 5 observational studies with retrospective data collection and 2 observational studies with prospective design were included in the final review. Data from the European ADMIRE-CD RCT demonstrated that darvadstrocel is superior to placebo in terms of clinical and imaging improvement over both the short and long term. These findings align with the prospective studies analyzed in this systematic review. The rate of treatment-emergent adverse events in the ADMIRE-CD trial's RCTs was similar in both the darvadstrocel and control groups, with perianal abscess being the most common adverse event up to 52 weeks after drug administration. Retrospective studies indicated no side-effects beyond 52 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS
Darvadstrocel appears to be a new, potentially effective and safe treatment option for the management of complex perianal fistulas. However, more randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of the drug.
PubMed: 38223244
DOI: 10.20524/aog.2023.0850 -
Techniques in Coloproctology Jun 2017Anal fistulas continue to be a problem for patients and surgeons alike despite scientific advances. While patient and anatomical characteristics are important to... (Review)
Review
Anal fistulas continue to be a problem for patients and surgeons alike despite scientific advances. While patient and anatomical characteristics are important to surgeons who are evaluating patients with anal fistulas, their development and persistence likely involves a multifaceted interaction of histological, microbiological, and molecular factors. Histological studies have shown that anal fistulas are variably epithelialized and are surrounded by dense collagen tissue with pockets of inflammatory cells. Yet, it remains unknown if or how histological differences impact fistula healing. The presence of a perianal abscess that contains gut flora commonly leads to the development of anal fistula. This implies a microbiological component, but bacteria are infrequently found in chronic fistulas. Recent work has shown an increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines and epithelial to mesenchymal cell transition in both cryptoglandular and Crohn's perianal fistulas. This suggests that molecular mechanisms may also play a role in both fistula development and persistence. The aim of this study was to examine the histological, microbiological, molecular, and host factors that contribute to the development and persistence of anal fistulas.
Topics: Adult; Anal Canal; Chronic Disease; Crohn Disease; Cytokines; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Female; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Rectal Fistula
PubMed: 28620877
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1645-5 -
International Journal of Colorectal... Jun 2012The incidence of anal abscess is relatively high, and the condition is most common in young men. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The incidence of anal abscess is relatively high, and the condition is most common in young men.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was undertaken.
RESULTS
This abscess usually originates in the proctodeal glands of the intersphincteric space. A distinction is made between subanodermal, intersphincteric, ischioanal, and supralevator abscesses. The patient history and clinical examination are diagnostically sufficient to establish the indication for surgery. Further examinations (endosonography, MRI) should be considered in recurrent abscesses or supralevator abscesses. The timing of the surgical intervention is primarily determined by the patient's symptoms, and acute abscess is generally an indication for emergency treatment. Anal abscesses are treated surgically. The type of access (transrectal or perianal) depends on the abscess location. The goal of surgery is thorough drainage of the focus of infection while preserving the sphincter muscles. The wound should be rinsed regularly (using tap water). The use of local antiseptics is associated with a risk of cytotoxicity. Antibiotic treatment is only necessary in exceptional cases. Intraoperative fistula exploration should be conducted with extreme care if at all; no requirement to detect fistula should be imposed. The risk of abscess recurrence or secondary fistula formation is low overall, but they can result from insufficient drainage. Primary fistulotomy should only be performed in case of superficial fistulas and by experienced surgeons. In case of unclear findings or high fistulas, repair should take place in a second procedure.
CONCLUSION
In this clinical S3 guideline, instructions for diagnosis and treatment of anal abscess are described for the first time in Germany.
Topics: Abscess; Anus Diseases; Germany; Humans; Male; Postoperative Complications; Rectal Fistula
PubMed: 22362468
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-012-1430-x