-
Dermatologic Surgery : Official... Nov 2022Perineural invasion (PNI) is considered a high-risk histopathologic feature in many skin cancers. Perineural invasion is a well-known poor prognostic factor of squamous...
BACKGROUND
Perineural invasion (PNI) is considered a high-risk histopathologic feature in many skin cancers. Perineural invasion is a well-known poor prognostic factor of squamous cell carcinoma, but is poorly understood in the context of basal cell carcinoma (BCC).
OBJECTIVE
To analyze available demographic, clinical, and treatment data for BCC with PNI and the effect of these variables on recurrence patterns, disease progression, and cancer-specific mortality (CSM).
METHODS
A systematic review and pooled-survival analysis was performed using case reports and series of patients with perineural BCC.
RESULTS
This review included 159 patients from 49 publications. Of these cases, 57 patients reported at least one recurrence. Where reported, median follow-up time was 31 months for patients without recurrence ( n = 79) and 21 months for patients with recurrence ( n = 32). The cumulative incidence of CSM at 5 years was 8.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.028-0.186) and the overall five-year survival was 90.9% (95% CI 0.796-0.961).
CONCLUSION
Male gender, multifocal nerve involvement, presence of clinical symptoms, and PNI detected on imaging are associated with poor prognosis of BCC with PNI. The high rate of disease recurrence and suboptimal cumulative incidence of CSM highlights the importance of early clinical detection, before the onset of symptomatic PNI and multifocal nerve involvement.
Topics: Humans; Male; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Survival Analysis; Prognosis; Peripheral Nerves; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36095258
DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003593 -
European Journal of Vascular and... Aug 2021Controlling pain after major lower limb amputation (MLLA) is of critical importance to patients and clinicians. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Controlling pain after major lower limb amputation (MLLA) is of critical importance to patients and clinicians. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of perineural catheters (PNCs) on post-operative pain, post-operative morphine requirement, in-hospital mortality, long term phantom limb pain, and chronic stump pain.
METHODS
A systematic review using PubMed, EMBASE via OVID and the Cochrane library from database inception (1946) to 20 October 2020 was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies involving patients undergoing MLLA which reported on post-operative morphine requirement, pain scores, in-hospital mortality, phantom limb pain (PLP), and chronic stump pain were included. Studies comparing PNC use with epidural or wound site local anaesthetic infusions were excluded. Outcome data were extracted from individual studies and meta-analysis was performed using a random effects (Mantel-Haenszel) model for dichotomous data using an odds ratio (OR) summary statistic with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and with an inverse variance random effects model for continuous data using a standardised mean difference (SMD) summary statistic with 95% CIs. Sensitivity analyses were performed for post-operative pain scores and post-operative morphine requirement. Study quality was assessed using the Downs and Black score, and outcomes were assessed using the GRADE tool.
RESULTS
Ten studies reporting on 731 patients were included, with 350 patients receiving a PNC and 381 receiving standard care. PNC use is associated with a reduction in post-operative pain (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.58 - -0.01, p = .040, I = 54%, GRADE quality of evidence: low) and post-operative morphine requirements (SMD -0.63, 95% CI -1.03 - -0.23, p = .002, I = 75%, GRADE quality of evidence: moderate), although the effect of PNC on reduced post-operative morphine requirements is lost on sensitivity analysis of randomised trials only (p = .40). No demonstrable effect was found on in-hospital mortality, PLP, or chronic stump pain (GRADE quality of evidence: low).
CONCLUSION
PNC use in amputees is associated with a significant reduction in post-operative pain scores and post-operative morphine requirements, although this latter finding is lost on sensitivity analysis of randomised trials only.
Topics: Amputation, Surgical; Amputation Stumps; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthetics, Local; Catheters; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Lower Extremity; Morphine; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Peripheral Nerves; Phantom Limb
PubMed: 34088614
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.03.008 -
Anaesthesia Jul 2021Both perineural and intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine are used as local anaesthetic adjuncts to enhance peripheral nerve block characteristics. However, the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Both perineural and intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine are used as local anaesthetic adjuncts to enhance peripheral nerve block characteristics. However, the effects of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine based on their administration routes have not been directly compared, and the relative extent to which each adjunct prolongs sensory blockade remains unclear. This network meta-analysis sought to compare and rank the effects of perineural and intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as supraclavicular block adjuncts. We sought randomised trials investigating the effects of adding perineural and intravenous dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine to long-acting local anaesthetics on supraclavicular block characteristics, including time to block onset and durations of sensory, motor and analgesic blockade. Data were compared and ranked according to relative effectiveness for each outcome. Our primary outcome was sensory block duration, with a 2-h difference considered clinically important. We performed a frequentist analysis, using the GRADE framework to appraise evidence. One-hundred trials (5728 patients) were included. Expressed as mean (95%CI), the control group (local anaesthetic alone) had a duration of sensory block of 401 (366-435) min, motor block duration of 369 (330-408) min and analgesic duration of 435 (386-483) min. Compared with control, sensory block was prolonged most by intravenous dexamethasone [mean difference (95%CI) 477 (160-795) min], followed by perineural dexamethasone [411 (343-480) min] and perineural dexmedetomidine [284 (235-333) min]. Motor block was prolonged most by perineural dexamethasone [mean difference (95%CI) 294 (236-352) min], followed by intravenous dexamethasone [289 (129-448)min] and perineural dexmedetomidine [258 (212-304)min]. Analgesic duration was prolonged most by perineural dexamethasone [mean difference (95%CI) 518 (448-589) min], followed by intravenous dexamethasone [478 (277-679) min] and perineural dexmedetomidine [318 (266-371) min]. Intravenous dexmedetomidine did not prolong sensory, motor or analgesic block durations. No major network inconsistencies were found. The quality of evidence for intravenous dexamethasone, perineural dexamethasone and perineural dexmedetomidine for prolongation of supraclavicular sensory block duration was 'low', 'very low' and 'low', respectively. Regardless of route, dexamethasone as an adjunct prolonged the durations of sensory and analgesic blockade to a greater extent than dexmedetomidine. Differences in block characteristics between perineural and intravenous dexamethasone were not clinically important. Intravenous dexmedetomidine did not affect block characteristics.
Topics: Adjuvants, Anesthesia; Administration, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Local; Brachial Plexus Block; Dexamethasone; Dexmedetomidine; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis
PubMed: 33118163
DOI: 10.1111/anae.15288 -
European Journal of Vascular and... Aug 2015The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of using an intraoperatively placed perineural catheter (PNC) with a postoperative local... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of using an intraoperatively placed perineural catheter (PNC) with a postoperative local anaesthetic infusion on immediate and long-term outcomes after lower limb amputation.
METHODS
A systematic review of key electronic journal databases was undertaken from inception to January 2015. Studies comparing PNC use with either a control, or no PNC, were included. Meta-analysis was performed for postoperative opioid use, pain scores, mortality, and long-term incidence of stump and phantom limb pain. Sensitivity analysis was performed for opioid use. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system.
RESULTS
Seven studies reporting on 416 patients undergoing lower limb amputation with PNC usage (n = 199) or not (n = 217) were included. Approximately 60% were transtibial amputations PNC use reduced postoperative opioid consumption (standardised mean difference: -0.59, 95% CI -1.10 to -0.07, p = .03), maintained on sensitivity analysis for large (p = .03) and high-quality (p = .003) studies, but was marginally lost (p = .06) on studies enrolling patients with peripheral arterial disease only. PNC treatment did not affect postoperative pain scores (p = .48), in-hospital mortality (p = .77), phantom limb pain (p = .28) or stump pain (p = .37). GRADE quality of evidence for all outcomes was very low.
CONCLUSION
There is poor-quality evidence that PNC usage significantly reduces opioid consumption following lower limb amputation, without affecting other short- or long-term outcomes. Well-performed randomised studies are required.
Topics: Amputation, Surgical; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthetics, Local; Catheterization; Catheters, Indwelling; Chi-Square Distribution; Humans; Infusions, Parenteral; Lower Extremity; Odds Ratio; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Phantom Limb; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26067167
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.04.030 -
PloS One 2014The prognostic role of perineural invasion in gastric cancer is controversial. Here, we present a systemic review and meta-analysis of the association between perineural... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The prognostic role of perineural invasion in gastric cancer is controversial. Here, we present a systemic review and meta-analysis of the association between perineural invasion and survival in resectable gastric cancer patients.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search for relevant reports published up to April 2013 was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Wanfang Data. Studies that investigated the role of perineural invasion with a sample size greater than 100 were included and analyzed.
RESULTS
A total of 30,590 gastric cancer patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy from twenty-four studies were included. The median rate of perineural invasion positive was 40.9% (6.8%-75.6%). Fourteen studies investigated overall survival unadjusted for other variables in 23,233 gastric cancer patients. The relative hazard estimates ranged from 0.568-7.901 with a combined random effects estimate of 2.261 (95% CI = 1.841-2.777, P = 0.000). The effect of perineural invasion on overall survival adjusted for other prognostic factors was reported in 17 studies incorporating 8,551 cases. The hazard estimates ranged from 0.420-8.110 with a pooled random effects estimates of 1.484 (95% CI = 1.237-1.781, P = 0.000). There was heterogeneity between the studies (Q = 49.22, I-squared = 67.5%, P = 0.000). Disease-free survival was investigated adjusted in four studies incorporating 9,083 cases and the pooled fixed hazard ratio estimate was 1.371(95% CI = 1.230-1.527, P = 0.000).
CONCLUSION
Perineural invasion is an independent prognostic factor affecting overall survival and disease-free survival of gastric cancer patients who had undergone the curative resection. This effect is independent of lymph node status, tumor size and the depth of invasion as well as a range of other biological variables on multivariate analysis. Large prospective studies are now needed to establish perineural invasion as an independent prognostic marker for gastric cancer.
Topics: Gastrectomy; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Models, Statistical; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Peripheral Nerves; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms
PubMed: 24586437
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088907 -
Oral Oncology Jul 2022At present, perineural invasion is used as a histologic indicator of aggressive salivary gland disease. In other head and neck malignancies, perineural invasion impacts... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
At present, perineural invasion is used as a histologic indicator of aggressive salivary gland disease. In other head and neck malignancies, perineural invasion impacts staging of cancer lesions and therefore affects treatment options.
OBJECTIVE
To compare survival outcomes in primary parotid malignancies with and without perineural invasion.A systematic review pooled data from the scientific literature in patients with any primary parotid malignancy to investigate the prognosis of those with perineural invasion.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed (Medline), Scopus and Cochrane databases were queried from inception to July 2020 without any initial search constraints. Additional publications were included from review of pertinent articles.
STUDY SELECTION
Our inclusion criteria included primary parotid cancers with reported perineural invasion on survival outcomes. Exclusion criteria were non-English language text, non-human studies, reviews, textbooks, abstracts, case reports and case series. Two authors independently reviewed articles for inclusion. Of the initial 465 records, 83 articles were reviewed in full to yield a final collection of 14 studies.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
PRISMA-p guidelines were used in the reporting of our studies. A MOOSE Checklist was also used. MINORS criteria were applied to assess risk of bias. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled effect sizes. No institutional review board review was needed for our study.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Primary study outcomes were set prior to data collection and included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients with and without perineural invasion.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies contributed to this meta-analysis. Compared to patients without perineural invasion, the pooled rate of mortality (HR = 3.64), time to recurrence (HR = 3.56), disease-specific mortality (HR = 2.77) and distant metastasis (HR = 3.84) was significantly higher for patients with PNI (all p <.001). Controlling for perineural invasion status, no moderator was associated with these survival outcomes (all p >.05). Given the clinical severity of perineural invasion, few studies were null as shown in a panel of publication bias plots.
CONCLUSION
Perineural invasion portends a poor survival outcome in patients with parotid malignancies.
Topics: Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Parotid Gland; Parotid Neoplasms; Prognosis
PubMed: 35662029
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105937 -
JAMA Dermatology Aug 2017Perineural invasion (PNI) in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) has been associated with an increased risk of poor outcomes. Patients with PNI may present with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
IMPORTANCE
Perineural invasion (PNI) in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) has been associated with an increased risk of poor outcomes. Patients with PNI may present with clinical symptoms and/or radiologic evidence of PNI (clinical PNI [CPNI]), yet most patients are asymptomatic and PNI is often found on histologic examination (incidental PNI [IPNI]). Evidence-based estimates of the risks of disease-related outcomes comparing IPNI and CPNI are limited in the dermatology literature.
OBJECTIVES
To review and synthesize outcomes data for patients with CSCC and CPNI or IPNI.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE for English-language articles published since inception to November 11, 2016.
STUDY SELECTION
All studies that reported a disease-related outcome (local recurrence, nodal metastasis, distant metastasis, or disease-specific death) of CSCCs with CPNI and IPNI were included.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Articles were screened for eligibility, and any possible discrepancies in this screening were resolved. Data extracted included study characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatments performed, and disease-related outcomes. Overall risks of disease-related outcomes were generated by pooling patients from eligible studies. χ2 Statistics and Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate differences in disease-related outcomes.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Risks of disease-related outcomes and 5-year recurrence-free, disease-specific, and overall survival.
RESULTS
A total of 12 studies containing 241 patients with CPNI and 381 patients with IPNI were included in the systematic review and analysis. The overall risks of local recurrence and disease-specific death were significantly higher in patients with CSCC and CPNI compared with those with CSCC and IPNI (local recurrence, 37% vs 17%; P < .001; disease-specific death, 27% vs 6%; P < .001). The risks of nodal metastasis and distant metastasis did not differ significantly by PNI classification. Patients with CSCC and CPNI had poorer mean 5-year recurrence-free survival and disease-specific survival compared with patients with IPNI (recurrence-free survival, 61% vs 76%; P = .009; disease-specific survival, 70% vs 88%; P = .002).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Patients with CSCC and CPNI are at an increased risk of local recurrence and disease-specific death compared with patients with CSCC and IPNI and have a 30% risk of death. Patients with PNI may benefit from increased long-term surveillance. Further studies are needed to establish standardized guidelines on follow-up and dermatologic surveillance in this high-risk patient population.
Topics: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Skin Neoplasms; Survival Rate
PubMed: 28678985
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.1680 -
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Dec 2016Perineural catheter infection is a rare but potentially dramatic complication of continuous peripheral nerve block. Different risk factors have been identified and the... (Review)
Review
Perineural catheter infection is a rare but potentially dramatic complication of continuous peripheral nerve block. Different risk factors have been identified and the incidence of infection is increased in trauma victims, intensive care unit patients, immunodeficient individuals, and diabetic patients. Also, postoperative hyperglycemia, the absence of antibiotic prophylaxis, and catheter lasting more than 48 hours seem to be associated with a greater risk of infection. Skin disinfection and a strict aseptic technique during catheter placement are fundamental. The use of micropore filters, antiseptic dressings, catheter tunneling, and aseptic preparation of the infused drug has all been hypothesized to reduce infection rate, but the existing evidence is conflicting. Infection is a rare complication of continuous peripheral nerve blocks. Severe and even fatal cases have been reported, even if morbidity is generally very low. The identification of high risk patients and adoption of preventive measures might reduce the incidence of this complication.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Catheter-Related Infections; Catheters; Drug Contamination; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Incidence; Nerve Block; Risk Factors; Time Factors
PubMed: 27871508
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.025 -
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2017Dexamethasone is a useful adjuvant in regional anesthesia that is used to prolong the duration of analgesia for peripheral nerve blocks. Recent randomized controlled... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Dexamethasone is a useful adjuvant in regional anesthesia that is used to prolong the duration of analgesia for peripheral nerve blocks. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated conflicting results as to whether perineural versus intravenous (IV) administration is superior in this regard, and the perineural use of dexamethasone remains off-label. Therefore, we sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
METHODS
In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we performed a random-effects meta-analysis of RCTs comparing perineural versus IV dexamethasone with duration of analgesia as the primary outcome.
RESULTS
Eleven RCTs met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1076 subjects. Perineural dexamethasone prolonged the duration of analgesia by 3.77 hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87-5.68 hours; P < 0.001) compared to IV dexamethasone, with high statistical heterogeneity. For secondary outcomes, perineural dexamethasone prolonged the duration of both motor (3.47 hours [95% CI, 1.49-5.45]; P < 0.001) and sensory (2.28 hours [95% CI, 0.38-4.17]; P = 0.019) block compared to IV administration. Furthermore, perineural dexamethasone patients consumed slightly less oral opioids at 24 hours than IV dexamethasone patients (7.1 mg of oral morphine equivalents [95% CI, 0.74-13.5 mg]; P = 0.029), and there were no statistically significant differences in the other secondary outcomes. Notably, no increase in adverse events was detected.
CONCLUSIONS
Perineural dexamethasone prolongs the duration of analgesia across the RCTs included in our meta-analysis. The magnitude of effect of 3.77 hours raises the question as to whether perineural dexamethasone should be administered routinely over its IV counterpart-or reserved for selected patients where such prolongation would be clinically important.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Autonomic Nerve Block; Dexamethasone; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 28252523
DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000571 -
JAMA Surgery Jun 2014Data on outcomes following surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are limited. The incidence of ICC is increasing and it has a poor prognosis. No... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
IMPORTANCE
Data on outcomes following surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are limited. The incidence of ICC is increasing and it has a poor prognosis. No consensus has been reached regarding the optimal treatment modalities.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review and synthesize the available evidence regarding treatment and prognosis in patients with ICC.
DATA SOURCES
The PubMed database was searched for relevant articles published between January 1, 2000, and April 1, 2013.
STUDY SELECTION
Only studies assessing predictors of survival or recurrence in patients undergoing curative-intent surgical treatment of ICC were included. Small series, studies reporting on mixed types of cholangiocarcinoma, or exclusively on hepatolithiasis-associated cholangiocarcinoma, and those published in a language other than English, French, German, Italian, or Greek, were excluded. Fifty-seven of 960 articles were therefore analyzed.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were extracted by 3 independent reviewers. Multiple studies reporting on the same population were excluded. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
We hypothesized that preoperative variables and tumor characteristics affect patient survival. The outcomes of the study were overall survival and recurrence-free survival. The hypothesis was formulated before data collection.
RESULTS
Fifty-seven studies (4756 patients) were included in the review. Median patient age ranged from 49 to 67 years, and 57% were male. Most patients had a solitary (69%), large (median size, 4.5-8.0 cm) tumor of the mass-forming type (86%). Approximately one-third of the patients had lymph node metastasis (34%) or vascular (38%), perineural (29%), or biliary invasion (29%). Most underwent a major hepatectomy (82%), often accompanied by lymphadenectomy (67%) and sometimes by extrahepatic bile duct resection (23%). Median and 5-year overall survival (OS) generally were approximately 28 months (range, 9-53 months) and 30% (range, 5%-56%), respectively; factors predicting shorter OS included large tumor size, multiple tumors, lymph node metastasis, and vascular invasion. Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy did not appear to be beneficial. Seven studies (2132 patients) provided data for the meta-analysis. Factors associated with shorter OS included older age (pooled hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17), larger tumor size (1.09; 1.02-1.16), presence of multiple tumors (1.70; 1.43-2.02), lymph node metastasis (2.09; 1.80-2.43), vascular invasion (1.87; 1.44-2.42), and poor tumor differentiation (1.41; 1.17-1.71).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The prognosis of ICC is dictated mainly by tumor factors. Future research could focus on the usefulness of adjuvant treatment as well as other multidisciplinary treatment modalities.
Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prognosis
PubMed: 24718873
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5137