-
Annals of Palliative Medicine Feb 2022At present, peritoneal dialysis (PD) is widely used in the clinical treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and comparison of the efficacy of PD and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
At present, peritoneal dialysis (PD) is widely used in the clinical treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and comparison of the efficacy of PD and hemodialysis (HD) in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) has been reported in a few clinical studies.
METHODS
In this study, "dialysis", "peritoneal dialysis", "renal replacement therapy", "end-stage renal disease", "diabetic renal disease", and "efficacy and safety" were used as search terms in Chinese and English databases. According to RevMan 5.3 and Stata 13 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration, a meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS
Four randomized controlled trials were included in this study, and 3 trials described the randomization method, 3 described allocation concealment in detail, and 2 used the blinding method. Compared with the HD treatment in the control group, the PD treatment in the experimental group can significantly reduce the hemoglobin of patients with end-stage DKD [Mean difference (MD) =-0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.21 to -0.04; P=0.003<0.05] and Albumin level (MD = -0.10, 95% CI: -0.16 to -0.04; P=0.002<0.05). Compared with the control group, the PD treatment in the experimental group significantly increased the serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels in patients with end-stage DKD, but there was no significant difference in the effects of PD and HD treatment on serum creatinine levels (MD =-0.30, 95% CI: -0.77 to 0.16; P=0.20>0.05), (MD =1.93, 95% CI: -2.65 to 6.51; P=-0.41>0.05). In addition, PD treatment in the experimental group significantly increased the probability of malignant tumors in patients with end-stage DKD [odds ratio (OR) =1.86, 95% CI: 1.64 to 2.10; P<0.00001], and the difference was significant.
DISCUSSIONS
This study used meta-analysis to confirm that PD can significantly improve the renal function of patients with end-stage DKD, but it can also increase the probability of protein loss and complications.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Nephropathies; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Peritoneal Dialysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Dialysis
PubMed: 35249347
DOI: 10.21037/apm-22-50 -
Renal Failure 2023Residual kidney function (RKF) impacts patients' survival rate and quality of life when undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). This meta-analysis was conducted to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Residual kidney function (RKF) impacts patients' survival rate and quality of life when undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically identify risk and protective factors associated with RKF decline and loss.
METHODS
We searched three English and one Chinese databases from inception to January 31, 2023, for cohort and cross-sectional studies exploring factors associated with RKF decline or loss. The random effects model was employed to aggregate risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from multivariate analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the heterogeneity among the studies.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven studies comprising 13549 individuals and 14 factors were included in the meta-analysis. Based on the meta-analysis results, risk factors involving male gender (hazard ratio (HR) 1.689, 95%CI 1.385-2.061), greater body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio (OR) 1.081, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.029-1.135), higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) (HR 1.014, 95%CI 1.005-1.024), diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 1.873, 95%CI 1.475-2.378), DM (OR 1.906, 95%CI 1.262-2.879), peritonitis (relative ratio (RR) 2.291, 95%CI 1.633-3.213), proteinuria (OR 1.223, 95%CI 1.117-1.338), and elevated serum phosphorus (RR 2.655, 95%CI 1.679-4.201) significantly contributed to the risk of RKF decline and loss in PD patients. Conversely, older age (HR 0.968, 95%CI 0.956-0.981), higher serum albumin (OR 0.834, 95%CI 0.720-0.966), weekly Kt/V urea (HR 0.414, 95%CI 0.248-0.690), baseline urine volume (UV) (HR 0.791, 95%CI 0.639-0.979), baseline RKF (HR 0.795, 95%CI 0.739-0.857) exhibited protective effects. However, diuretics use, automatic peritoneal dialysis (APD) modality and baseline RKF did not significantly impact RKF decline.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with male gender, greater BMI, higher SBP, DM, peritonitis, proteinuria, and elevated serum phosphorus might have a higher risk of RKF decline and loss. In contrast, older age, higher serum albumin, weekly Kt/V urea, baseline UV, and baseline RKF might protect against RKF deterioration.
Topics: Humans; Male; Cross-Sectional Studies; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Peritoneal Dialysis; Peritonitis; Phosphorus; Proteinuria; Quality of Life; Serum Albumin; Urea; Female
PubMed: 38036948
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2286328 -
Journal of Nephrology Oct 2021No consensus currently exists regarding the optimal approach for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. We aimed to compare the outcomes of percutaneous and surgical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
No consensus currently exists regarding the optimal approach for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. We aimed to compare the outcomes of percutaneous and surgical peritoneal dialysis catheter placement.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed using the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases (end-of-search date: August 29th, 2020). We included studies comparing percutaneous (blind, under fluoroscopic/ultrasound guidance, and "half-perc") and surgical peritoneal dialysis catheter placement (open and laparoscopic) in terms of their infectious complications (peritonitis, tunnel/exit-site infections), mechanical complications (leakage, inflow/outflow obstruction, migration, hemorrhage, hernia, bowel perforation) and long-term outcomes (malfunction, removal, replacement, surgery required, and mortality).
RESULTS
Thirty-four studies were identified, including thirty-two observational studies (twenty-six retrospective and six prospective) and two randomized controlled trials. Percutaneous placement was associated with significantly lower rates of tunnel/exit-site infection [relative risk (RR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.91], catheter migration (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49, 0.95), and catheter removal (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.88). The 2-week and 4-week rates of early tunnel/exit-site infection were also lower in the percutaneous group (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22-0.93 and RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.63, respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed regarding other outcomes, including catheter survival and mechanical complications.
CONCLUSION
Overall, the quality of published literature on the field of peritoneal dialysis catheter placement is poor, with a small percentage of studies being randomized clinical trials. Percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter placement is a safe procedure and may result in fewer complications, such as tunnel/exit-site infections, and catheter migration, compared to surgical placement.
PROTOCOL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42020154951.
Topics: Catheters, Indwelling; Humans; Peritoneal Dialysis; Peritonitis; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 33197001
DOI: 10.1007/s40620-020-00896-w -
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine : a... Oct 2022Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is used in several cardiac surgical units after cardiac surgery, and early initiation of PD after surgery may have the potential to influence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is used in several cardiac surgical units after cardiac surgery, and early initiation of PD after surgery may have the potential to influence postoperative outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize the evidence for the association between early PD after cardiac surgery and postoperative outcomes.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed from 1981 to November 1, 2021.
STUDY SELECTION
Observational studies and randomized trials reporting on early PD after pediatric cardiac surgery.
DATA EXTRACTION
Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% CIs for postoperative mortality and pooled mean difference (MD) (95% CI) for duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay.
DATA SYNTHESIS
We identified nine studies from the systematic review, and five were considered suitable for meta-analysis. Early initiation of PD after cardiac surgery was associated with a reduction in postoperative mortality (OR, 0.43 (95% CI, 0.23-0.80); number of estimates = 4). Early commencement of PD shortened duration of mechanical ventilation (MD [95% CI], -1.09 d [-1.86 to -0.33 d]; I2 = 56.1%; p = 0.06) and intensive care length of stay (MD [95% CI], -2.46 d [-3.57 to -1.35 d]; I2 = 18.7%; p = 0.30], respectively. All three estimates had broad 95% prediction intervals (crossing null) denoting major heterogeneity between studies and wide range of possible study estimates in similar future studies. Overall, studies reporting on the effects of early PD included only a subset of infants undergoing cardiac surgery (typically high-risk infants), so selection bias may be a major issue in published studies.
CONCLUSIONS
This review suggests that early initiation of PD may be associated with beneficial postoperative outcomes in infants after cardiac surgery. However, these results were based on studies of varying qualities and risk of bias. Early identification of high-risk infants after cardiac surgery is important so that prevention or early mitigation strategies can be applied to this cohort. Future prospective studies in high-risk populations are needed to study the role of early PD in influencing postoperative outcomes.
Topics: Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Child; Humans; Infant; Length of Stay; Peritoneal Dialysis; Prospective Studies; Respiration, Artificial
PubMed: 35839279
DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003024 -
European Review For Medical and... Mar 2019The present study was aimed at illustrating short- or long-term patient outcome among individuals with urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) compared with those with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The present study was aimed at illustrating short- or long-term patient outcome among individuals with urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) compared with those with conventional PD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. Cohort studies were investigated comparing the effects of urgent start of PD (<14 days after catheter insertion) to those of conventional start of PD (≥14 days after catheter insertion). Risks of bias across studies were evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. We calculated the pooled risk ratios and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous data and continuous data, respectively.
RESULTS
Six studies involving 1,242 patients were identified. Compared with conventional PD, urgent-start PD was not associated with a high mortality (RR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.69; I2=0%, p=0.99) and a higher prevalence of overall mechanical complications (RR: 1.79, 95% CI: 0.85 to 3.78; p=0.12; I2=64%, p=0.02). However, urgent-start PD was associated with a higher prevalence of leakage (RR: 6.72, 95% CI: 2.11 to 21.32; I2=0%, p=0.60). In terms of infectious complications, data analysis of the fixed-effects model showed no difference between the two groups. (RR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.90 to 2.05, p=0.14), regardless of peritonitis (RR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.90 to 2.05, p=0.14; I2=0%, p=0.70) or other infections (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.49 to 2.69, p=0.99; I2=0%, p=0.75).
CONCLUSIONS
Urgent-start PD was not associated with a higher risk of mortality and dialysis-related complications. However, compared with conventional PD, an urgent start of PD may increase the risk of a leak.
Topics: Catheterization; Female; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Peritoneal Dialysis; Peritonitis; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30915761
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_201903_17261 -
Peritoneal Dialysis International :... May 2024Cirrhosis and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are significant global health concerns, contributing to high mortality and morbidity. Haemodialysis (HD) is frequently used...
BACKGROUND
Cirrhosis and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are significant global health concerns, contributing to high mortality and morbidity. Haemodialysis (HD) is frequently used to treat ESKD in patients with cirrhosis. However, it often presents challenges such as haemodynamic instability during dialysis sessions, leading to less than optimal outcomes. Peritoneal dialysis (PD), while less commonly used in cirrhotic patients, raises concerns about the risks of peritonitis and mortality. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess outcomes in PD patients with cirrhosis.
METHODS
We executed a comprehensive search in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases up to 25 September 2023. The search focused on identifying studies examining mortality and other clinical outcomes in ESKD patients with cirrhosis receiving PD or HD. In addition, we sought studies comparing PD outcomes in cirrhosis patients to those without cirrhosis. Data from each study were aggregated using a random-effects model and the inverse-variance method.
RESULTS
Our meta-analysis included a total of 13 studies with 15,089 patients. Seven studies compared ESKD patients on PD with liver cirrhosis (2753 patients) against non-cirrhosis patients (9579 patients). The other six studies provided data on PD (824 patients) versus HD (1943 patients) in patients with cirrhosis and ESKD. The analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality between PD and HD in ESKD patients with cirrhosis (pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53-1.14). In PD patients with cirrhosis, the pooled OR for peritonitis compared to non-cirrhosis patients was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.03-1.18). The pooled ORs for hernia and chronic hypotension in cirrhosis patients compared to non-cirrhosis controls were 2.48 (95% CI: 0.08-73.04) and 17.50 (95% CI: 1.90-161.11), respectively. The pooled OR for transitioning from PD to HD among cirrhotic patients was 1.71 (95% CI: 0.76-3.85). Mortality in cirrhosis patients on PD was comparable to non-cirrhosis controls, with a pooled OR of 1.05 (95% CI: 0.53-2.10).
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis demonstrates that PD provides comparable mortality outcomes to HD in ESKD patients with cirrhosis. In addition, the presence of cirrhosis does not significantly elevate the risk of mortality among patients undergoing PD. While there is a higher incidence of chronic hypotension and a slightly increased risk of peritonitis in cirrhosis patients on PD compared to those without cirrhosis, the risks of hernia and the need to transition from PD to HD are comparable between both groups. These findings suggest PD as a viable and effective treatment option for ESKD patients with cirrhosis.
PubMed: 38757682
DOI: 10.1177/08968608241237401 -
Peritoneal Dialysis International :... Jul 2023Gastrointestinal (GI) health is considered vital to the success of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and is critically important to patients, caregivers and clinicians. However,...
BACKGROUND
Gastrointestinal (GI) health is considered vital to the success of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and is critically important to patients, caregivers and clinicians. However, the multiplicity of GI outcome measures in trials undermines the ability to evaluate the frequency, impact and treatment of GI symptoms in patients receiving PD. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the range and consistency of GI outcomes reported in contemporary PD trials.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
SETTING AND POPULATION
Individuals with kidney failure requiring PD.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised controlled trials involving patients on PD, identified from the PUBMED, EMBASE and COCHRANE Central Registry of controlled Trials (CENTRAL) database, from January 2010 to July 2022.
INTERVENTIONS
Any PD-related intervention.
OUTCOMES
The frequency and characteristics of GI outcome measures were analysed and classified.
RESULTS
Of the 324 eligible PD trials, GI outcomes were only reported in 61 (19%) trials, mostly as patient-reported outcomes (45 trials; 74%). The most frequently reported outcomes were in 27 (43%), in 26 (43%), in 22 (36%), in 21 (34%) and in 19 (31%) of trials. was the primary non-GI outcome reported in 24 (40%) trials, followed by in 13 (21%) trials) and exit-site infection in 9 (15%) trials). Across all trials, 172 GI outcome measures were extracted and grouped into 29 different outcomes. Nausea and diarrhoea contributed to 16% and 15% of GI outcomes, respectively, while vomiting, constipation and abdominal pain contributed to 13%, 12% and 12%, respectively. Most (90%) GI outcomes were patient-reported adverse effects with no defined metrics. was reported as the primary study outcome in 3 (100%) trials using the subjective global assessment score, GI symptom rating scale and faecal microbiological and biochemical analysis. Two trials reported nausea as a primary study outcome using One trial each reported as the primary study outcome using . were also reported as the primary study outcome in one trial each using the was reported as the secondary outcome in three (37%) out of eight trials reporting it.
LIMITATIONS
Restricted sampling frame to focus on contemporary trials.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the clinical importance of GI outcomes among patients on PD, they are reported in only 19% of PD trials, using inconsistent metrics, often as patient-reported adverse events. Efforts to standardise GI outcome reporting are critical to optimising comparability, reliability and value of trial evidence to improve outcomes for patients receiving PD.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Reproducibility of Results; Peritoneal Dialysis; Constipation; Diarrhea; Vomiting; Nausea; Abdominal Pain
PubMed: 36127835
DOI: 10.1177/08968608221126849 -
Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation :... Aug 2020Peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are at high risk of developing glucose metabolism disturbance (GMD). The incidence and prevalence of new-onset GMD, including diabetes... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are at high risk of developing glucose metabolism disturbance (GMD). The incidence and prevalence of new-onset GMD, including diabetes mellitus (DM), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fast glucose (IFG), after initiation of PD, as well as their correlated influence factors, varies among studies in different areas and of different sample sizes. Also, the difference compared with hemodialysis (HD) remained unclear. Thus we designed this meta-analysis and systematic review to provide a full landscape of the occurrence of glucose disorders in PD patients.
METHODS
We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies through September 2018. Meta-analysis was performed on outcomes using random effects models with subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS
We identified 1124 records and included 9 studies involving 13 879 PD patients. The pooled incidence of new-onset DM (NODM) was 8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4-12; I2 = 98%] adjusted by sample sizes in PD patients. Pooled incidence rates of new-onset IGT and IFG were 15% (95% CI 3-31; I2 = 97%) and 32% (95% CI 27-37), respectively. There was no significant difference in NODM risk between PD and HD [risk ratio 0.99 (95% CI 0.69-1.40); P = 0.94; I2 = 92%]. PD patients with NODM were associated with an increased risk of mortality [hazard ratio 1.06 (95% CI 1.01-1.44); P < 0.001; I2 = 92.5%] compared with non-DM PD patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Around half of PD patients may develop a glucose disorder, which can affect the prognosis by significantly increasing mortality. The incidence did not differ among different ethnicities or between PD and HD. The risk factor analysis did not draw a definitive conclusion. The glucose tolerance test should be routinely performed in PD patients.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Glucose; Humans; Peritoneal Dialysis; Prognosis; Risk Factors
PubMed: 31236586
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfz116 -
Peritoneal Dialysis International :... Jan 2022Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis is one of the top priorities for care and research among PD stakeholders. This study summarizes PD peritonitis rates from...
Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis is one of the top priorities for care and research among PD stakeholders. This study summarizes PD peritonitis rates from available population-based national or regional registries around the world, examining trends over time. This is a systematic review of PD peritonitis rates in patients treated with PD for kidney failure, from census-based national or provincial/statewide/provider registries or databases. MEDLINE (via PubMed) was searched from inception to August 2020, and inquiries made to national registry personnel using the International Comparisons section of the 2018 United States Renal Data System Annual Data Report as a contact list. Quantitative synthesis was done using weighted random-effects Poisson regression. Of 81 countries that reported utilization of PD, 19 did not have a traditional dialysis registry (governed by either professional societies or government entities), and only 33 monitored PD peritonitis rates correctly and accessibly. There is wide variation in PD peritonitis rates between countries, although the global average has been decreasing over time, from 0.600 episodes/patient-year in 1992 to 0.303 in 2019. Other sources of variability include the continent in which the country is nested and the size of its PD population. PD peritonitis, despite its importance for PD stakeholders, is under-monitored. While the global rate is decreasing over time, the presence and extent of this improvement varies from country to country. There is an opportunity for better monitoring, research into underachieving and overachieving nations and development of international clinical support networks.
Topics: Female; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Peritoneal Dialysis; Peritonitis; Registries; Renal Dialysis
PubMed: 33827339
DOI: 10.1177/0896860821996096 -
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and... 2021Home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with kidney failure. For a...
BACKGROUND
Home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with kidney failure. For a patient to undergo PD, a safe and reliable method of accessing the peritoneum is needed. However, different catheter insertion techniques may affect patient health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the risk of infectious and mechanical complications between surgical (open and laparoscopic) PD catheter insertion and percutaneous catheter insertion.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
SETTING
We searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS from inception until June 2018. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers based on a preformed template.
PATIENTS
Adult (aged 18+) patients with kidney failure who underwent a PD catheter insertion procedure.
MEASUREMENTS
We analyzed leak, malfunction, and bleed as early complications (occurring within 1 month of catheter insertion). Infectious complications (exit-site infections, tunnel infections, and peritonitis) were presented as both early complications and with the longest duration of follow-up.
METHODS
Random effects meta-analyses with the generic inverse variance method to estimate pooled rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We quantified heterogeneity by using the I2 statistic for inconsistency and assessed heterogeneity using the χ test. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing studies at high risk of bias as measured with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
RESULTS
Twenty-four studies (22 observational, 2 RCTs) with 3108 patients and 3777 catheter insertions were selected. Data from 2 studies were unable to be extracted and were qualitatively assessed. In the remaining 22 studies, percutaneous insertion was associated with a lower risk of both exit-site infections (risk ratio [RR] = 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.53, I = 0%) and peritonitis (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.77, I = 3%) within 1 month of the procedure. There was no difference in mechanical complication rates between the 2 techniques.
LIMITATIONS
Lack of consistency in the time periods for the various outcomes reported, risk of bias concerns with respect to population comparability, and the inability to analyze individual component causes of primary nonfunction (catheter obstruction, catheter migration, and leak).
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis suggests differences in early infectious complications in favor of percutaneous insertion and no significant differences in mechanical complications compared with surgical insertion. These findings have implications on the direction of PD programs in terms of maximizing operating room resources.
PubMed: 34795905
DOI: 10.1177/20543581211052731