-
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Sep 2022To update the ASCO Biomarkers to Guide Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) guideline.
PURPOSE
To update the ASCO Biomarkers to Guide Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) guideline.
METHODS
An Expert Panel conducted a systematic review to identify randomized clinical trials and prospective-retrospective studies from January 2015 to January 2022.
RESULTS
The search identified 19 studies informing the evidence base.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Candidates for a regimen with a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor and hormonal therapy should undergo testing for mutations using next-generation sequencing of tumor tissue or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma to determine eligibility for alpelisib plus fulvestrant. If no mutation is found in ctDNA, testing in tumor tissue, if available, should be used. Patients who are candidates for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy should undergo testing for germline and pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations to determine eligibility for a PARP inhibitor. There is insufficient evidence for or against testing for a germline pathogenic variant to determine eligibility for PARP inhibitor therapy in the metastatic setting. Candidates for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy should undergo testing for expression of programmed cell death ligand-1 in the tumor and immune cells to determine eligibility for treatment with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. Candidates for an immune checkpoint inhibitor should also undergo testing for deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high to determine eligibility for dostarlimab-gxly or pembrolizumab, as well as testing for tumor mutational burden. Clinicians may test for fusions to determine eligibility for TRK inhibitors. There are insufficient data to recommend routine testing of tumors for mutations, for homologous recombination deficiency, or for TROP2 expression to guide MBC therapy selection. There are insufficient data to recommend routine use of ctDNA or circulating tumor cells to monitor response to therapy among patients with MBC.Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.
Topics: Adenosine Diphosphate; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Biomarkers, Tumor; Breast Neoplasms; Circulating Tumor DNA; Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Female; Fulvestrant; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Ligands; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Ribose
PubMed: 35759724
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.01063 -
Molecular Medicine Reports May 2022The main aim of the present systematic review was to summarize the most frequently used telomerase regulators with an impact on aging and cancer that are referred to in...
The main aim of the present systematic review was to summarize the most frequently used telomerase regulators with an impact on aging and cancer that are referred to in and studies. For this purpose, a systematic review of the available literature on telomerase regulators referred to in articles from PubMed and Scopus libraries published from 2002 to 2021 and in accordance with PRISMA 2020 criteria, was conducted. Articles were included if they met the following criteria: They referred to telomerase modulators in aging and in cancer and were and/or studies, while studies that did not provide sufficient data or studies not written in English were excluded. In the present systematic review, 54 publications were included, of which 29 were full‑text published studies, 11 were full‑text reviews, 10 structure‑based design studies and 4 abstracts are reported in this review. Telomerase regulators were then categorized as synthetic direct telomerase inhibitors, synthetic indirect telomerase inhibitors, synthetic telomerase activators, natural direct telomerase activators, natural telomerase inhibitors and natural indirect telomerase activators, according to their origin and their activity. On the whole, as demonstrated herein, telomerase regulators appear to be promising treatment agents in various age‑related diseases. However, further and studies need to be performed in order to clarify the potentiality of telomerase as a therapeutic target.
Topics: Aging; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Neoplasms; Telomerase; Telomere
PubMed: 35266017
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12674 -
Cancer Reports (Hoboken, N.J.) Jan 2023Accumulating studies have evaluated the association between MAP3K1 polymorphisms and cancer prognosis. However, the results of these studies are conflicting. Given the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Accumulating studies have evaluated the association between MAP3K1 polymorphisms and cancer prognosis. However, the results of these studies are conflicting. Given the potential impact of MAP3K1 rs889312 SNP on the prognosis of various cancers, this meta-analysis was performed to obtain solid and credible evidence.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
This study was performed according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. A comprehensive article search was conducted to find and select articles from multiple databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, published up to 15th September 2022. The data analysis was performed with Review Manager v5.2. Pooled HR with its 95% CI and p-value was calculated where HR >1 suggests worse/poor survival and HR <1 suggests better survival of cancer patients.
RESULTS
A total of five articles comprising 24 439 patients were included for both qualitative and quantitative data synthesis. It was found that only the dominant genetic model (AC + CC vs. AA) showed a statistically significant poor overall survival for MAP3K1 rs889312 polymorphism (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.06-1.47, p = .01). In addition, publication bias analysis by the Egger's test and the Begg-Mazumdar test reported no significant bias in the analysis of overall survival (p > .05).
CONCLUSIONS
The present study concludes that MAP3K1 gene rs889312 polymorphism plays a prognostic role in the survival of cancer patients. However, future research is recommended that will analyze more MAP3K SNPs along with rs889312, which may reveal more credible outcomes in terms of cancer prognosis.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Prognosis; MAP Kinase Kinase Kinase 1
PubMed: 36560873
DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1773 -
PloS One 2014Sphingosine kinase 1 (SK1) is a key regulator of the dynamic ceramide/sphingosine 1-phosphate rheostat balance and important in the pathological cancer genesis,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Sphingosine kinase 1 (SK1) is a key regulator of the dynamic ceramide/sphingosine 1-phosphate rheostat balance and important in the pathological cancer genesis, progression, and metastasis processes. Many studies have demonstrated SK1 overexpressed in various cancers, but no meta-analysis has evaluated the relationship between SK1 and various cancers.
METHODS
We retrieved relevant articles from the PubMed, EBSCO, ISI, and OVID databases. A pooled odds ratio (OR) was used to assess the associations between SK1 expression and cancer; hazard ratios (HR) were used for 5-year and overall survival. Review Manager 5.0 was used for the meta-analysis, and publication bias was evaluated with STATA 12.0 (Egger's test).
RESULTS
Thirty-four eligible studies (n=4,673 patients) were identified. SK1 positivity and high expression were significantly different between cancer, non-cancer, and benign tissues. SK1 mRNA and protein expression levels were elevated in the cancer tissues, compared with the normal tissues. SK1 positivity rates differed between various cancer types (lowest [27.3%] in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and highest [82.2%] in tongue squamous cell carcinoma). SK1 positivity and high expression were associated with 5-year survival; the HR was 1.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-2.94) for breast cancer, 1.58 (1.08-2.31) for gastric cancer, and 2.68 (2.10-3.44) for other cancers; the total cancer HR was 2.21 (95% CI, 1.83-2.67; P < 0.00001). The overall survival HRs were 2.09 (95% CI, 1.35-3.22), 1.56 (1.08-2.25), and 2.62 (2.05-3.35) in breast, gastric, and other cancers, respectively. The total effect HR was 2.21 (95% CI, 1.83-2.66; P < 0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS
SK1 positivity and high expression were significantly associated with cancer and a shorter 5-year and overall survival. SK1 positivity rates vary tremendously among the cancer types. It is necessary to further explore whether SK1 might be a predictive biomarker of outcomes in cancer patients.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Enzyme Activation; Gene Expression; Humans; Neoplasms; Phosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor); Proportional Hazards Models; Publication Bias; RNA, Messenger
PubMed: 24587339
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090362 -
Future Oncology (London, England) Jun 2021This review aims to qualitatively summarize the published real-world evidence (RWE) for CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) approved for treating HR+, HER2-negative...
This review aims to qualitatively summarize the published real-world evidence (RWE) for CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) approved for treating HR+, HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2- a/mBC). A systematic literature review was conducted to identify RWE studies of CDK4/6i in HR+/HER2- a/mBC published from 2015 to 2019. This review identified 114 studies, of which 85 were only presented at scientific conferences. Most RWE studies investigated palbociclib and demonstrated improved outcomes. There are limited long-term and comparative data between CDK4/6i and endocrine monotherapy, and within the CDK4/6i class. Available RWE suggests that CDK4/6i are associated with improved outcomes in HR+/HER2- a/mBC, although additional studies with longer follow-up periods are needed.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6; Estrogen Receptor alpha; Female; Humans; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Receptor, ErbB-2; Receptors, Progesterone; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33663223
DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-1264 -
Human Cell Mar 2022The Proviral Integration of Molony murine leukemia virus (PIM)-1 protein contributes to the solid cancers and hematologic malignancies, cell growth, proliferation,... (Review)
Review
The Proviral Integration of Molony murine leukemia virus (PIM)-1 protein contributes to the solid cancers and hematologic malignancies, cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, migration, and other life activities. Many studies have related these functions to its molecular structure, subcellular localization and expression level. However, recognition of specific active sites and their effects on the activity of this constitutively active kinase is still a challenge. Based on the close relationship between its molecular structure and functional activity, this review covers the specific residues involved in the binding of ATP and different substrates in its catalytic domain. This review then elaborates on the relevant changes in protein conformation and cell functions after PIM-1 binds to different substrates. Therefore, this intensive study can improve the understanding of PIM-1-regulated signaling pathways by facilitating the discovery of its potential phosphorylation substrates.
Topics: Animals; Catalytic Domain; Cell Proliferation; Hematologic Neoplasms; Mice; Phosphorylation; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-pim-1
PubMed: 35000143
DOI: 10.1007/s13577-021-00656-3 -
Endocrine-related Cancer Aug 2023Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have shown advantages in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have shown advantages in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET. Literature conforming to the research content was identified according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The efficacy endpoints included invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS) with adjuvant therapy. The efficacy endpoint of neoadjuvant therapy was complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA). The safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and grade 3-4 hematological and non-hematological AEs. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager software (version 5.3). A statistical model (fixed-effects model or random-effects model) was selected based on the level of heterogeneity, and a sensitivity analysis was performed if strong heterogeneity existed. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the baseline patient characteristics. Nine articles (including six RCTs) were included in the study. In adjuvant therapy, compared with the control group, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET showed no statistically significant difference in IDFS (hazard ratio = 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.64-1.08, P = 0.17) and DRFS (hazard ratio = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.52-1.31, P = 0.42). In neoadjuvant therapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET significantly improved CCCA compared with the control group (odds ratio = 9.00, 95% CI = 5.42-14.96, P < 0.00001). In terms of safety, the combination treatment group had a significantly increased incidence of grade 3-4 hematological AEs in patients, especially grade 3-4 neutropenia (risk ratio (RR) = 63.90, 95% CI = 15.44-264.41, P < 0.00001) and grade 3-4 leukopenia (RR = 85.89, 95% CI = 19.12-385.77, P < 0.00001), with statistically significant differences. In patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer, the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors may prolong IDFS and DRFS in adjuvant therapy, especially in high-risk patients. Further follow-up is needed to establish whether OS can be improved with CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET. CDK4/6 inhibitors also showed effective anti-tumor proliferation activity in neoadjuvant therapy. Regular monitoring of routine blood tests in patients using CDK4/6 inhibitors is essential.
Topics: Female; Humans; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Receptor, ErbB-2; Protein Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 37283514
DOI: 10.1530/ERC-22-0365 -
BMC Cancer Nov 2023RAS mutations affect prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and have been identified as strong negative predictive markers for anti-epidermal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
RAS mutations affect prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and have been identified as strong negative predictive markers for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (anti-EGFR mAb) therapy, but many tumors containing wild-type RAS genes still do not respond to these therapies. Some additional biomarkers may have prognostic or predictive roles, but conclusions remain controversial.
METHODS
We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-EGFR mAb therapy with alternative therapy that investigated the prognostic and predictive impact of additional biomarkers in RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR) were calculated. The prognostic value of biomarkers was investigated by separately pooling HR and OR for different treatment groups in an individual study. The predictive value was assessed by pooling study interactions between treatment effects and biomarker subgroups.
RESULTS
Thirty publications reporting on eighteen trials were selected, including a total of 13,507 patients. In prognostic analysis, BRAF mutations were associated with poorer PFS [HRs = 3.76 (2.47-5.73) and 2.69 (1.82-3.98)] and OS [HRs = 2.66 (1.95-3.65) and 2.45 (1.55-3.88)] in both the experimental and control arms; low miR-31-3p expression appeared to have longer PFS and OS. In terms of predictive effect, a lack of response to anti-EGFR therapy was observed in patients with BRAF mutant tumors (P < 0.01 for PFS). Patients with tumors with any mutation in the KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA gene also showed similar results compared with all wild-type tumors (P for PFS, OS, and ORR were < 0.01, < 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). While low miR-31-3p expression could predict PFS (P = 0.01) and OS (P = 0.04) benefit. The prognostic and predictive value regarding PIK3CA mutations, PTEN mutations or deletions, EGFR, EREG/AREG, HER2, HER3, and HER4 expression remains uncertain.
CONCLUSIONS
In RAS wt mCRC patients receiving EGFR-targeted therapy, BRAF mutation is a powerful prognostic and therapy-predictive biomarker, with no effect found for PIK3CA mutation, PTEN mutation or deletion, but the combined biomarker KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations predict resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. Low miR-31-3p expression may have positive prognostic and therapy predictive effects. Evidence on the prognostic and predictive roles of EGFR and its ligands, and HER2/3/4 is insufficient.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Colorectal Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); ErbB Receptors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Colonic Neoplasms; Rectal Neoplasms; Biomarkers; Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Mutation; MicroRNAs; Biomarkers, Tumor
PubMed: 37974093
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11600-z -
Inflammation Research : Official... Sep 2023The therapeutic efficacy of systemic Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is well established. However, the associated risk of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The therapeutic efficacy of systemic Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is well established. However, the associated risk of incident acne, which is a prevalent adverse event in AD patients treated with systemic JAK inhibitors, has yet to be systematically analyzed.
METHODOLOGY
To evaluate the risk of incident acne in AD patients treated with systemic JAK inhibitors, an extensive database search (clinicaltrials.gov, PubMed) was performed to identify publications eligible for inclusion from January 2020 to October 2022. Five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of abrocitinib, four RCTs of upadacitinib, and one RCT of baricitinib, encompassing a total of 7901 participants, were included in the analysis. The risk difference for incident acne between systemic JAK inhibitors and controls was assessed using Review Manager, version 5.3, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
RESULTS
Meta-analysis elucidated a significant difference in the risk of incident acne between AD participants receiving 200 mg abrocitinib (Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, 3.69; 95% CI 1.60-8.48; P < 0.01), 15 mg upadacitinib (Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, 4.61; 95% CI 2.79-7.62; P < 0.00001), and 30 mg upadacitinib (Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, 6.82; 95% CI 4.59-10.13; P < 0.00001) compared with controls receiving placebo or dupilumab. In contrast, no significant difference was found in the risk of incident acne between participants receiving 100 mg abrocitinib, 2 mg baricitinib, and 4 mg baricitinib, as compared with controls.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the current evidence, there is an increased risk of acne related to systemic JAK inhibitors, particularly with abrocitinib and upadacitinib. For patients predisposed to acne, the balance between the benefits of symptomatic relief from AD and the potential risk of acne may need to be carefully considered. This study contributes to a nuanced understanding of the risk profile of systemic JAK inhibitors and has the potential to guide personalized treatment decisions for AD patients.
Topics: Humans; Dermatitis, Atopic; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Acne Vulgaris; Janus Kinase 1
PubMed: 37707560
DOI: 10.1007/s00011-023-01789-x -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Sep 2023This study aimed to: (1) identify all relevant studies reporting on the diagnostic accuracy of maternal circulating placental growth factor) alone or as a ratio with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Accuracy of placental growth factor alone or in combination with soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 or maternal factors in detecting preeclampsia in asymptomatic women in the second and third trimesters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to: (1) identify all relevant studies reporting on the diagnostic accuracy of maternal circulating placental growth factor) alone or as a ratio with soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1), and of placental growth factor-based models (placental growth factor combined with maternal factors±other biomarkers) in the second or third trimester to predict subsequent development of preeclampsia in asymptomatic women; (2) estimate a hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic curve for studies reporting on the same test but different thresholds, gestational ages, and populations; and (3) select the best method to screen for preeclampsia in asymptomatic women during the second and third trimester of pregnancy by comparing the diagnostic accuracy of each method.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic search was performed through MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases from January 1, 1985 to April 15, 2021.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies including asymptomatic singleton pregnant women at >18 weeks' gestation with risk of developing preeclampsia were evaluated. We included only cohort or cross-sectional test accuracy studies reporting on preeclampsia outcome, allowing tabulation of 2×2 tables, with follow-up available for >85%, and evaluating performance of placental growth factor alone, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1- placental growth factor ratio, or placental growth factor-based models. The study protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register Of Systematic Reviews (CRD 42020162460).
METHODS
Because of considerable intra- and interstudy heterogeneity, we computed the hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic plots and derived diagnostic odds ratios, β, θ, and Λ for each method to compare performances. The quality of the included studies was evaluated by the QUADAS-2 tool.
RESULTS
The search identified 2028 citations, from which we selected 474 studies for detailed assessment of the full texts. Finally, 100 published studies met the eligibility criteria for qualitative and 32 for quantitative syntheses. Twenty-three studies reported on performance of placental growth factor testing for the prediction of preeclampsia in the second trimester, including 16 (with 27 entries) that reported on placental growth factor test alone, 9 (with 19 entries) that reported on the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-placental growth factor ratio, and 6 (16 entries) that reported on placental growth factor-based models. Fourteen studies reported on performance of placental growth factor testing for the prediction of preeclampsia in the third trimester, including 10 (with 18 entries) that reported on placental growth factor test alone, 8 (with 12 entries) that reported on soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-placental growth factor ratio, and 7 (with 12 entries) that reported on placental growth factor-based models. For the second trimester, Placental growth factor-based models achieved the highest diagnostic odds ratio for the prediction of early preeclampsia in the total population compared with placental growth factor alone and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-placental growth factor ratio (placental growth factor-based models, 63.20; 95% confidence interval, 37.62-106.16 vs soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-placental growth factor ratio, 6.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.76-27.61 vs placental growth factor alone, 5.62; 95% confidence interval, 3.04-10.38); placental growth factor-based models had higher diagnostic odds ratio than placental growth factor alone for the identification of any-onset preeclampsia in the unselected population (28.45; 95% confidence interval, 13.52-59.85 vs 7.09; 95% confidence interval, 3.74-13.41). For the third trimester, Placental growth factor-based models achieved prediction for any-onset preeclampsia that was significantly better than that of placental growth factor alone but similar to that of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-placental growth factor ratio (placental growth factor-based models, 27.12; 95% confidence interval, 21.67-33.94 vs placental growth factor alone, 10.31; 95% confidence interval, 7.41-14.35 vs soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-placental growth factor ratio, 14.94; 95% confidence interval, 9.42-23.70).
CONCLUSION
Placental growth factor with maternal factors ± other biomarkers determined in the second trimester achieved the best predictive performance for early preeclampsia in the total population. However, in the third trimester, placental growth factor-based models had predictive performance for any-onset preeclampsia that was better than that of placental growth factor alone but similar to that of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-placental growth factor ratio. Through this meta-analysis, we have identified a large number of very heterogeneous studies. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop standardized research using the same models that combine serum placental growth factor with maternal factors ± other biomarkers to accurately predict preeclampsia. Identification of patients at risk might be beneficial for intensive monitoring and timing delivery.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Biomarkers; Cross-Sectional Studies; Placenta Growth Factor; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1
PubMed: 36990308
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.032