-
Prostate International Sep 2019Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging focal treatment modality for prostate cancer. However, the efficacy, safety, and functional outcomes of PDT are not clear. We... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging focal treatment modality for prostate cancer. However, the efficacy, safety, and functional outcomes of PDT are not clear. We performed a meta-analysis of available single-arm studies and control trials which used PDT for prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched Pubmed, Embase, Ovid and the Cochrane library (until March,2018) for studies about PDT in patients with prostate cancer. The negative biopsy rate after PDT, PSA decreasing rate, pooled rate of functional outcome (IPSS or IIEF-5), and adverse events were analyzed.
RESULTS
14 studies containing 654 patients were included. Nine of the 14 included studies had evaluated a negative biopsy rate after PDT. The pooled rate was 55.0% (95.0% CI: 0.44-0.66, I = 85.7%). Twelve of the 14 included studies which evaluated PSA decreasing rate with the pooled rate of 35.0% (95.0% CI: 0.24-0.47, I = 88.7%). Six of the included studies evaluated IPSS with decreasing rate of 29.1% (95.0 % CI: 2.7%-55.5%, I = 96.9%). Five of the included studies evaluated IIEF-5 with decreasing rate of 14.9% (95.0% CI: 6.8%-23.0%, I = 44.2%). The most common adverse events were haematuria (28.1%, 95.0% CI: 17.1%-39.2%, I = 79.8%), erectile dysfunction (23.1%, 95.0% CI: 9.7%-36.5%, I = 87.7%), and dysuria (18.6%, 95.0% CI: 12.1%-25.0 %, I = 53.4 %).
CONCLUSIONS
The meta-analysis results shows that PDT for patients with prostate cancer can be considered as effective based on single-arm clinical trials. Meanwhile, this study reveals that there are not only low levels of side effect rates but also insignificant effect on both urinary and erectile function. However, more high-quality RCTs are needed to evaluate the comparative efficacy, safety, and functional outcomes of PDT for patients with prostate cancer.
PubMed: 31485431
DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2018.12.002 -
Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and... May 2022This systematic review aims to analyze the effectiveness of the association of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and photobiomodulation (PBM) in the treatment of recurrent... (Review)
Review
This systematic review aims to analyze the effectiveness of the association of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and photobiomodulation (PBM) in the treatment of recurrent herpes labialis and to analyze the very many variables of parameters applied, number of sessions, photosensitizer concentration, and the timing of the intervention to offer clinicians an indication of the most likely optimal techniques and parameters required to achieve clinical success. This study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses PRISMA Checklist and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). We searched and identified articles of the subsequent bibliographic databases: PubMed and Cochrane. Since there are no clinical trials regarding the association of PDT and PBM in the treatment of herpes labialis, we only included case reports in our review. All studies used methylene blue solution as the photosensitizer and the laser (diode laser or low-power laser) with a wavelength of 660 nm as the light source. Power output, power density, number of irradiation points, number of PBM sessions, and irradiation duration varied between the included studies. Despite the diversity in parameters between studies, all case reports showed good results regarding relieving symptoms, accelerating healing, as well as reducing the incidence of recurrence without side effects. The association of PDT in the vesicular phase and PBM in the crust phase can be considered a promising solution for recurrent labial herpes. Despite the many successful cases reported, establishing an effective clinical protocol for the treatment of herpes labialis using PDT followed by PBM will only be possible through double-blind placebo studies that would elucidate the exact action of this treatment modality, the appropriate irradiation parameters for both therapies, optimal timing, and number of PBM sessions following PDT. This review has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under number CRD42021290757.
Topics: Herpes Labialis; Humans; Lasers, Semiconductor; Low-Level Light Therapy; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 35483089
DOI: 10.1089/photob.2021.0186 -
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Feb 2016Cutaneous lichen planus (CLP) is an inflammatory dermatosis. Its chronic relapsing course and frequently spontaneous regression hamper the assessment of treatment... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Cutaneous lichen planus (CLP) is an inflammatory dermatosis. Its chronic relapsing course and frequently spontaneous regression hamper the assessment of treatment effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy of available treatment modalities for CLP.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov registry.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the current literature. All randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized case-control studies, and cohort studies with more than one treatment arm were included. The primary outcomes were complete response and time to complete response. The secondary outcomes were partial response, relapse, time to relapse, reduction of itch, the adverse event rate, and withdrawal due to adverse events.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 11 were randomized controlled trials. Most trials had a small sample size. In the rare studies in which variants other than generalized or classic lichen planus were included, they could not be analyzed separately. Body-of-evidence quality ranged from very low to moderate. Acitretin, sulfasalazine, and griseofulvin were associated with increased overall response rates in comparison with placebo. Narrow-band ultraviolet B radiation (NBUVB) was more effective than 6 weeks' low-dose prednisolone in achieving a complete response, and prednisolone was more effective than enoxaparin. Hydroxychloroquine was more effective than griseofulvin in achieving an overall response. Betamethasone valerate 0.1% ointment had comparable efficacy to calcipotriol ointment. Methotrexate was effective, with a nonsignificant difference in the complete response rate in comparison with oral betamethasone. In nonrandomized controlled trials, oral psoralen plus ultraviolet A photochemotherapy (PUVA) had comparable efficacy to a PUVA bath and NBUVB. Psoralen plus sunlight exposure (PUVASOL) and betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% cream were effective relative to a short course of oral metronidazole.
CONCLUSIONS
Several effective treatment options are available for CLP. Further well-designed studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy of topical glucocorticoids-the current first-line therapy-as well as other treatment modalities, and the treatment of different variants of CLP.
Topics: Acitretin; Administration, Cutaneous; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antifungal Agents; Calcitriol; Dermatologic Agents; Enoxaparin; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Ficusin; Glucocorticoids; Griseofulvin; Humans; Keratolytic Agents; Lichen Planus; Male; Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; PUVA Therapy; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfasalazine; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26507510
DOI: 10.1007/s40257-015-0160-6 -
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Jun 2023Moderate-to-severe acne affects people's health and quality of life. As first-line therapeutic medications, isotretinoin and antibiotics are used to treat... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Moderate-to-severe acne affects people's health and quality of life. As first-line therapeutic medications, isotretinoin and antibiotics are used to treat moderate-to-severe acne, but outcomes can be improved. The combination of fire needle and ALA-PDT may be one option. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness in the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne by the combination with fire needle and ALA-PDT.
METHODS
By July 2022, search PubMed, the Chinese Biomedical Literature dababase, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese Scientific Journal Database, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Web of Science Datebase, Embase Datebase,VIP Database and WanFang Database. To gather RCTs of the combination of fire needle and ALA-PDT for the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne. A meta-analysis was performed according to the Handbook guidelines of Cochrane. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation were all governed by two reviewers, with the help of a third reviewer if necessary. The meta-analysis was carried out with Review Manager Software 5.4.
RESULTS
There were a total of 9 RCTs with 862 participants. Clinical efficacy was recorded in nine trials, GAGS score was published in three studies, adverse events were documented in five studies, and the recurrence rate was reported in two studies. Treatment lasted between four and twelve weeks. Combination therapy outperformed monotherapy in terms of clinical efficacy (OR:3.73; 95% CI:2.51, 5.53; p < 0.00001). Additional subgroup analysis revealed that the combination therapy outperformed ALA-PDT alone in terms of clinical effect (OR: 3.20; 95% CI: 2.05, 4.99; p < 0.00001). Additionally, combination therapy outperformed fire needle alone in terms of clinical efficacy (OR:5.66; 95% CI: 2.66, 12.08; p < 0.00001). Studies have also indicated that combination therapy has a stronger benefit in lowering the GAGS score (MD:-3.35; 95% CI:-4.62, -2.09; p < 0.00001). Additionally, there was no discernible difference in the occurrence of adverse events between the combined treatments and monotherapy (OR:1.43; 95% CI: 0.76, 2.69; p = 0.26), and the combined treatment was able to control the recurrence rate (OR:0.18; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.45; P = 0.0002).
CONCLUSIONS
The efficacy of fire needle combined with ALA-PDT in the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne appears superior to that of ALA-PDT or fire needle alone. However, the conclusions of this study must be interpreted carefully due to the high risk and ambiguity of bias of the included trials.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Acne Vulgaris
PubMed: 36384211
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.103200 -
BMC Oral Health Oct 2023To evaluate the clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an adjunct or alternative to traditional antifungal drugs in the treatment of oral candidiasis, and to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an adjunct or alternative to traditional antifungal drugs in the treatment of oral candidiasis, and to provide evidence-based medical evidence for its use in the treatment of oral candidiasis.
METHODS
Computer combined with manual retrieval of China Academic Journals Full-text Database (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Wanfang Database, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus retrieval for articles published before January 2023, basic information and required data were extracted according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the Revman V5.4 software was used to conduct Meta-analysis of the included literature.
RESULTS
A total of 11 articles were included, 7 of which used nystatin as an antifungal drug, 2 of which were combined treatment of PDT and nystatin, 2 of the remaining 4 articles were treated with fluconazole, and 2 were treated with miconazole. Meta results showed that PDT was superior to nystatin in reducing the number of oral candida colonies in the palate of patients MD = -0.87, 95%CI = (-1.52,-0.23), P = 0.008, the difference was statistically significant, and the denture site MD = -1.03, 95%CI = (-2.21, -0.15), P = 0.09, the difference was not statistically significant; compared with the efficacy of fluconazole, RR = 1.01, 95%CI = (0.56,1.83), P = 0.96; compared with miconazole RR = 0.55, 95%CI = (0.38, 0.81), P = 0.002; PDT combined with nystatin RR = 1.27, 95%CI = (1.06, 1.52), P = 0.01; recurrence rate RR = 0.28, 95%CI = (0.09, 0.88), P = 0.03.
CONCLUSIONS
PDT was effective in the treatment of oral candidiasis; PDT was more effective than nystatin for the treatment of denture stomatitis in the palate, while there was no significant difference between the two for the denture site; The efficacy of PDT for oral candidiasis was similar to that of fluconazole; PDT was less effective than miconazole for oral candidiasis; Compared with nystatin alone, the combination of PDT and nystatin is more effective in treating oral candidiasis with less risk of recurrence.
Topics: Humans; Candidiasis, Oral; Antifungal Agents; Nystatin; Fluconazole; Miconazole; Photochemotherapy
PubMed: 37884914
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03484-z -
Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and... Feb 2023The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in treating superficial fungal infections, and provide reference for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in treating superficial fungal infections, and provide reference for clinical application. In accordance with Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO), the research question and keywords were formulated. Records published in English by PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science as of November 14, 2022 were retrieved, including the keywords "mycoses," "tinea," "photochemotherapy," etc. Besides, meta-analysis performed by STATA and PROSPERO registration code was CRD42022363448. One thousand four hundred eighty-four records were identified and 18 articles involving 343 patients with superficial fungal infections were enrolled. The overall mycological cure rate of PDT is 55% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-0.65]. The fungal cure rate using methylene blue (MB) as photosensitizer (PS) is 67% (95% CI: 0.55-0.79); using 5-aminolevulinic acid is 34% (95% CI: 0.21-0.47); and using methyl aminolevulinate is 56% (95% CI: 0.33-0.78). The fungal cure rate of moderate-to-severe onychomycosis according to Onychomycosis Severity Index is 60% (95% CI: 0.47-0.73) and that of moderate onychomycosis is 66% (95% CI: 0.56-0.76). It was observed that the treatment parameters did not follow the same standard across studies. The majority of the included studies were moderate to low biased. PDT, particularly using MB as PS, has a certain mycological cure rate and safety at treating superficial mycoses. Due to the insufficient number of studies on PDT in the treatment of superficial fungal infections and the small sample size of some studies, more studies with standardized PDT parameters, large sample size, and long follow-up periods are needed to prove that PDT has the potential to become an alternative to traditional antifungal therapy or to find a better combination between them.
Topics: Humans; Onychomycosis; Photosensitizing Agents; Photochemotherapy; Antifungal Agents; Ultraviolet Therapy
PubMed: 36780576
DOI: 10.1089/photob.2022.0117 -
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Jun 2023The present study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of the contemporary photoactivated disinfection methods on the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The present study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of the contemporary photoactivated disinfection methods on the mechanical features and/or antimicrobial activity of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) dentures bases.
METHODS
THE FOCUSED RESEARCH QUESTION WAS: "What is the effect of contemporary photoactivated disinfection methods as compared to conventional disinfection protocols on the mechanical features and/or antimicrobial activity of PMMA dentures bases?". An electronic literature search was carried out by the author and a senior librarian specialized in health sciences on Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus. In vitro investigations evaluating the antimicrobial and/or mechanical effects of photoactivated disinfectants as compared to conventional chemical disinfectants on the microbes formed on PMMA denture bases were included. Meta-analysis was performed for calculating the standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS
Four out of eight studies concluded that photoactivated disinfectants, including riboflavin-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT), hematoporphyrin-mediated PDT, poly-l-glycolic acid loaded with methylene blue, Erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser, erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser, and chitosan-mediated PDT, demonstrated a significant reduction in colony-forming unit per milliliter (CFU/mL) of exposed viable colonies of Escherichia coli (E. coli), Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and Candida albicans (C. albicans) comparable to the conventionally used chemical disinfectants of PMMA denture bases. Contrarily, two studies concluded that the PMMA denture base colonized with C. albicans and disinfected with conventional chemical disinfectants showed the greatest anti-fungal efficaciousness. All the included studies concluded that the application of photoactivated disinfectants does not negatively impact the mechanical features of the PMMA denture bases colonized with microbes including E. coli, S. mutans, S. aureus, and C. albicans. The meta-analysis revealed statistically significant reduction in C. albicans counts (CFU/mL [Log10]) (p < 0.00001) and improvement in the flexural strength (p = 0.0002) of PMMA-based denture base after the application of conventional disinfectants, while a statistically significant improvement in the fracture strength of PMMA-based denture base was observed after the application of photoactivated disinfectants (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION
According to the systematic review (qualitative synthesis), photoactivated disinfectants demonstrated comparable mechanical features and antimicrobial activity of PMMA dentures bases to conventional chemical disinfectants suggesting their potential to be utilized as an alternative to conventional chemical disinfectants. However, the meta-analysis (quantitative synthesis) revealed that the application of conventional disinfectants demonstrated better outcomes related to antimicrobial activity and flexural strength of PMMA-based denture based.
Topics: Polymethyl Methacrylate; Disinfection; Denture Bases; Escherichia coli; Staphylococcus aureus; Erbium; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Disinfectants; Materials Testing; Candida albicans
PubMed: 36958538
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103523 -
TheScientificWorldJournal 2014The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (PDTa) on cariogenic dental biofilm. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (PDTa) on cariogenic dental biofilm.
TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED
Studies in vivo, in vitro, and in situ were included. Articles that did not address PDTa, those that did not involve cariogenic biofilm, those that used microorganisms in the plankton phase, and reviews were excluded. Data extraction and quality assessments were performed independently by two raters using a scale.
RESULTS
Two hundred forty articles were retrieved; only seventeen of them met the eligibility criteria and were analyzed in the present review. Considerable variability was found regarding the methodologies and application protocols for antimicrobial PDTa. Two articles reported unfavorable results.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
The present systematic review does not allow drawing any concrete conclusions regarding the efficacy of antimicrobial PDTa, although this method seems to be a promising option.
Topics: Biofilms; Dental Caries; Dental Plaque; Humans; Light; Methylene Blue; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Streptococcus; Tolonium Chloride
PubMed: 25379545
DOI: 10.1155/2014/824538 -
BMC Oral Health Aug 2023This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of oral leukoplakia and explore the subgroup factors that may influence its... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of oral leukoplakia and explore the subgroup factors that may influence its effectiveness.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata15.0 software. Cochran's Q test and I statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity, egger's test was used to evaluate publication bias.
RESULTS
The analysis of 17 studies included in this study suggests that PDT may be effective in achieving complete response (CR) [ES = 0.50, 95%CI: (0.33,0.66)], partial response (PR) [ES = 0.42, 95%CI: (0.27,0.56)], no response (NR) [ES = 0.19, 95%CI: (0.11,0.27)]in patients with oral leukoplakia. The recurrence rate was also evaluated [ES = 0.13, 95%CI: (0.08,0.18)]. Subgroup analysis showed that various factors such as light source, wavelength, medium, duration of application, clinical and pathological diagnosis classification influenced efficacy of PDT. The lesion areas of the leukoplakia after treatment were reduced by 1.97cm compared with those before treatment.
CONCLUSION
Our findings show that PDT is a viable treatment for oral leukoplakia. However, the effectiveness of the therapy may depend on several factors, as suggested by our subgroup analyses. (Registration no. CRD42023399848 in Prospero, 26/02/2023).
Topics: Humans; Photosensitizing Agents; Photochemotherapy; Leukoplakia, Oral
PubMed: 37574560
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03294-3 -
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Jun 2021Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as compared to antibiotics in periodontitis and peri-implantitis has been tested in several clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as compared to antibiotics in periodontitis and peri-implantitis has been tested in several clinical trials. Yet controversial results were reported. The aim of the present study was to answer the question: "Will adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy be more effective than antibiotics agent in the treatment of periodontitis and peri-implantitis?".
METHODS
Publications compared outcomes between aPDT and antibiotics in adult patients with periodontitis or peri-implantitis, containing more than 3-month follow-up duration, were involved in the systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central were searched until December of 2020. Clinical parameters including pocket probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were evaluated. The risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane Collaboration Tool. Weighted mean differences (WMD), 95 % confidence interval(CI) and heterogeneity were estimated by Review Manager software.
RESULTS
10 trials in periodontitis and 5 trials in peri-implantitis were included. Meta-analysis outcomes revealed equal clinical evidence for aPDT and antibiotics in periodontitis and peri-implantitis. In addition, aPDT significantly reduced the red complex in both diseases. However, owing to the heterogeneity of protocols in articles and the limited number of studies, the comparative conclusion remained unconfirmed.
CONCLUSION
aPDT can be considered as an alternative to antibiotics in the treatment of peri-implantitis and periodontitis. Given that high heterogeneity in outcome was found in this review, future long-term clinical trials with standard aPDT and antibiotic treatment should be tested to arrive at a firm conclusion.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Humans; Peri-Implantitis; Periodontitis; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents
PubMed: 33621702
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102231