-
Journal of Atrial Fibrillation 2020The Right phrenic nerve (RPN) is vulnerable to injury during the isolation of the right pulmonary veins (RPV). The study aimed to provide a comprehensive meta-analysis...
BACKGROUND
The Right phrenic nerve (RPN) is vulnerable to injury during the isolation of the right pulmonary veins (RPV). The study aimed to provide a comprehensive meta-analysis of the overall prevalence of right phrenic nerve injury (RPNI), its course and its association with the superior and inferior pulmonary veins.
METHODS
Through December 2017, a database search was performed on PubMed, Science Direct, EMBASE, SciELO, and Web of Science. The references were also extensively searched in the included articles.
RESULTS
Detection of the RPN may vary according to the identification method. It ranges from 100% in postmortem studies, 93% in intraoperative, to 57.88% in computer tomography (CT) imaging. Based on the included studies (n-507), the distance from the right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) ostium to the RPN was 12.48mm (±6.21). In postmortem studies, the distance was 6.92mm (±3.94); in pre or intraoperative techniques, 13.32mm (±5.96) if noninvasive, 13.97mm (±7.8) if invasive. Distances ranged from 0DC342.6 mm. For the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV) (n-125) the mean distance was 16.53mm (±8.92) with distances from 0.4 68mm. The risk of RPNI with distance-included studies was 12.46% (47 RPNI in 377 cases). In the meta-analysis, the distance from the RSPV to the RPN that was associated with an increased risk of RPNI was 7.36mm.
CONCLUSIONS
RPNI is a relatively rare complication. A firm understanding of its course, relation to the PV ostium, and detection are vital for preventing future injuries and complications.
PubMed: 34950302
DOI: 10.4022/jafib.2305 -
ANZ Journal of Surgery Mar 2023Neck dissection is a commonly performed procedure for oncologic control of head and neck malignancy. With contemporary modified radical and selective neck dissections,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Neck dissection is a commonly performed procedure for oncologic control of head and neck malignancy. With contemporary modified radical and selective neck dissections, haematoma, wound infection, tissue necrosis, chyle leak and injury involving the marginal mandibular, hypoglossal, vagus or accessory nerves are commonly described complications. Although the phrenic nerve courses within the surgical planes explored during a neck dissection and has a vital function in innervating the diaphragm, few studies have been performed to investigate the exact incidence of post-operative phrenic nerve paresis. This study aims to review the literature as to the rate of phrenic nerve injury following neck dissection.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted from 2000 to 2022 including studies reporting on phrenic nerve paresis following neck dissection.
RESULTS
In total, 11 studies were included. The reported rate of immediate post-operative phrenic nerve paresis ranged from 0% to 5.3%, with an average rate of 0.613% (12/1959). The reported rate of phrenic nerve paresis at follow-up (1 month-127 months) ranged from 0% to 4.7%, with an average rate of 1.035% (5/483). There were no cases of bilateral phrenic nerve paresis reported in this period.
CONCLUSIONS
Phrenic nerve paresis is an uncommon complication following neck dissection, often asymptomatic and potentially underreported. Bilateral phrenic nerve paresis is exceedingly rare. Injury can be avoided by staying superficial to the prevertebral fascia when dissecting around the anterior scalene muscle. Routine phrenic nerve integrity monitoring is not commonly utilized but may aid intra-operative phrenic nerve identification or confirmation of function.
Topics: Humans; Phrenic Nerve; Neck Dissection; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Paresis
PubMed: 36792555
DOI: 10.1111/ans.18322 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Jan 2023: Ipsilateral shoulder pain (ISP) is a common complication after thoracic surgery. Severe ISP can cause ineffective breathing and impair shoulder mobilization. Both... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Efficacy of Phrenic Nerve Block and Suprascapular Nerve Block in Amelioration of Ipsilateral Shoulder Pain after Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
: Ipsilateral shoulder pain (ISP) is a common complication after thoracic surgery. Severe ISP can cause ineffective breathing and impair shoulder mobilization. Both phrenic nerve block (PNB) and suprascapular nerve block (SNB) are anesthetic interventions; however, it remains unclear which intervention is most effective. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of PNB and SNB for the prevention and reduction of the severity of ISP following thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Studies published in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library without language restriction were reviewed from the publication's inception through 30 September 2022. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the comparative efficacy of PNB and SNB on ISP management were selected. A network meta-analysis was applied to estimate pooled risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). : Of 381 records screened, eight studies were eligible. PNB was shown to significantly lower the risk of ISP during the 24 h period after surgery compared to placebo (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.58) and SNB (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.64). PNB significantly reduced the severity of ISP during the 24 h period after thoracic surgery (WMD -1.75, 95% CI -3.47 to -0.04), but these effects of PNB were not statistically significantly different from SNB. When compared to placebo, SNB did not significantly reduce the incidence or severity of ISP during the 24 h period after surgery. This study suggests that PNB ranks first for prevention and reduction of ISP severity during the first 24 h after thoracic surgery. SNB was considered the worst intervention for ISP management. No evidence indicated that PNB was associated with a significant impairment of postoperative ventilatory status.
Topics: Humans; Phrenic Nerve; Shoulder Pain; Nerve Block; Thoracic Surgery; Pain, Postoperative; Network Meta-Analysis; Injections, Intra-Articular
PubMed: 36837476
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020275 -
Annals of Anatomy = Anatomischer... Jun 2024The aim of this systematic review is to study the subdiaphragmatic anatomy of the phrenic nerve. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this systematic review is to study the subdiaphragmatic anatomy of the phrenic nerve.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A computerised systematic search of the Web of Science database was conducted. The key terms used were phrenic nerve, subdiaphragmat*, esophag*, liver, stomach, pancre*, duoden*, intestin*, bowel, gangli*, biliar*, Oddi, gallbladder, peritone*, spleen, splenic, hepat*, Glisson, falciform, coronary ligament, kidney, suprarenal, and adrenal. The 'cited-by' articles were also reviewed to ensure that all appropriate studies were included.
RESULTS
A total of one thousand three hundred and thirty articles were found, of which eighteen met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies scale revealed substantial to excellent methodological quality of human studies, while a modified version of the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation Risk of Bias Tool denoted poor methodological quality of animal studies. According to human studies, phrenic supply has been demonstrated for the gastro-esophageal junction, stomach, celiac ganglia, liver and its coronary ligament, inferior vena cava, gallbladder and adrenal glands, with half of the human samples studied presenting phrenic nerve connections with any subdiaphragmatic structure.
CONCLUSIONS
This review provides the first systematic evidence of subdiaphragmatic phrenic nerve supply and connections. This is of interest to professionals who care for people suffering from neck and shoulder pain, as well as patients with peridiaphragmatic disorders or hiccups. However, there are controversies about the autonomic or sensory nature of this supply.
Topics: Phrenic Nerve; Humans; Diaphragm; Animals
PubMed: 38692333
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2024.152269 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular... Aug 2022This meta-analysis was aimed at investigating the effectiveness and safety of phrenic nerve infiltration (PNI) against ipsilateral shoulder pain (ISP) after thoracic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Effect of Intraoperative Phrenic Nerve Infiltration on Postoperative Ipsilateral Shoulder Pain After Thoracic Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.
OBJECTIVES
This meta-analysis was aimed at investigating the effectiveness and safety of phrenic nerve infiltration (PNI) against ipsilateral shoulder pain (ISP) after thoracic surgery.
DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
SETTING
Operating room.
PARTICIPANTS
Patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
INTERVENTIONS
PNI.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases were searched from inception through December 2021. The primary outcome was the overall incidence of ISP, with secondary outcomes including incidence and severity of ISP at postoperative 6, 24, and 48 hours. Six RCTs involving 482 patients undergoing thoracic surgery were included. Pooled results found a significantly lower incidence of overall ISP in patients with PNI (ie, 23.6%) compared to those without (ie, 53.2%; risk ratio: 0.46, 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.61; I = 19%; 6 RCTs; n = 474; certainty of evidence = high). At postoperative 6, 24, and 48 hours, there was also a significantly lower incidence of ISP in the PNI group than in the control group (certainty of evidence for all outcomes = high). Besides, the severity of ISP was lower in the PNI group at 6 (certainty of evidence = moderate) and 24 hours (certainty of evidence = high), with insufficient data for analysis at 48 hours because of only 1 trial.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis showed that PNI not only reduced the incidence but also improved the severity of ipsilateral shoulder pain after thoracic surgery with a prophylactic effect lasting up to 48 hours. The limited number of included studies warrants further research to support these findings.
Topics: Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Phrenic Nerve; Postoperative Period; Shoulder Pain; Thoracic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 35570082
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.04.016 -
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology Aug 2022Because of the insidious character and variations in presenting symptoms, Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is challenging to diagnose in children. Diagnosis is based on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Because of the insidious character and variations in presenting symptoms, Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is challenging to diagnose in children. Diagnosis is based on clinical and nerve conduction studies, as well as genetic examination. Therefore, competent nerve imaging techniques and non-invasive alternatives to nerve conduction studies are a necessity, especially in children. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the current evidence and effectiveness of ultrasound in investigating nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) in those with CMT compared with healthy controls and to pool the CSA measurements. We included studies published in international peer-reviewed journals that measured nerve CSA by ultrasound in patients with CMT. We implemented double-arm meta-analyses to compare the mean CSA of nerves between patients with CMT and healthy controls by calculating the pooled mean difference in CSA. Moreover, we performed subgroup analyses by stratifying the studies according to the site of CSA measurement and examined the difference in nerve CSA between CMT1A and other CMT types. The included studies provide measurements of 12 nerve roots and nerves (vagus, C3, C4, C5, C6, greater auricular, phrenic, median, ulnar, fibular, tibial and sural nerves) in 628 patients with CMT and 586 healthy controls with a total of 6061 measured nerves. Meta-analyses of sonographic nerve CSA are provided to express nerve ultrasonography in the diagnosis of CMT patient.
Topics: Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease; Child; Humans; Peripheral Nerves; Sural Nerve; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 35667977
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.04.220 -
Clinical Neurophysiology : Official... Jan 2020To assess the prognostic value of phrenic nerve conduction (PNC) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To assess the prognostic value of phrenic nerve conduction (PNC) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review to identify studies reporting on PNC, and mortality and/or forced vital capacity (FVC) in patients with ALS. We searched Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Two independent authors selected studies and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool. Hazard-ratios and correlation coefficients were pooled using a random effects generic inverse-variance model. Evidence quality was evaluated with GRADE.
RESULTS
In the pooled analysis, patients with CMAP-amplitude equal or below 0.4 mV are 2.021 more likely to die over the studied period (95%CI 1.161-3.522; I = 55.9%; 338 participants). CMAP-amplitude showed a moderate positive correlation with FVC (r = 0.400, 95%CI = 0.226-0.550; I = 69.77%; 381 participants). However, there was a weak negative correlation between CMAP-latency and FVC (r = -0.235; 95%CI = -0.447 to -0.024; I = 15.92%; 112 participants).
CONCLUSIONS
There is moderate-quality evidence that CMAP-amplitude of the PNC is correlated with FVC. Results favour a predictive value for mortality, but the risk of bias is high.
SIGNIFICANCE
PNC is a simple test that should be considered to assess respiratory function in ALS, especially in patients with bulbar involvement or cognitive impairment.
Topics: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neural Conduction; Observational Studies as Topic; Phrenic Nerve; Prognosis; Publication Bias; Vital Capacity
PubMed: 31760209
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.10.016 -
Journal of Cardiovascular... Sep 2021In May 2020, a novel cryoballoon system (POLARx; Boston Scientific) became available for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The design of the cryoballoon is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison of procedural efficacy, balloon nadir temperature, and incidence of phrenic nerve palsy between two cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
In May 2020, a novel cryoballoon system (POLARx; Boston Scientific) became available for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The design of the cryoballoon is comparable to the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro; Medtronic), but it is more compliant during freezing. We compared the procedural efficacy, biophysical parameters, and risk of phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) between the two cryoballoons.
METHODS
Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were searched until June 1, 2021 for relevant studies comparing POLARx versus AFA-Pro in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for AF.
RESULTS
A total of four studies, involving 310 patients were included. There was no difference between the two groups for outcomes regarding procedural efficacy: acute PVI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06 to 3.03; p = .40), procedure time (mean difference [MD]: 8.15 min; 95% CI: -8.09 to 24.39; p = .33), fluoroscopy time (MD: 1.32 min; 95% CI: -1.61 to 4.25; p = .38) and ablation time (MD: 1.00 min; 95% CI: -0.20 to 2.20; p = .10). The balloon nadir temperature was lower for all individual pulmonary veins (PV) in POLARx compared with AFA-Pro (MD: -9.74°C, -9.98°C, -6.72°C, -7.76°C, for left superior PV, left inferior PV, right superior PV, and right inferior PV, respectively; all p < .001). The incidence of PNP was similar between groups (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.22 to 2.85; p = .72).
CONCLUSION
In AF patients undergoing PVI, POLARx and AFA-Pro had a similar procedural efficacy. Balloon nadir temperatures were lower with POLARx, however, the incidence of PNP was similar.
Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Cryosurgery; Humans; Incidence; Paralysis; Phrenic Nerve; Pulmonary Veins; Temperature; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34289198
DOI: 10.1111/jce.15182 -
World Neurosurgery Nov 2022Phrenic nerve dysfunction has been associated with cervical neuroforaminal stenosis in limited case reports and case-controlled studies. It is unclear if magnetic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Phrenic nerve dysfunction has been associated with cervical neuroforaminal stenosis in limited case reports and case-controlled studies. It is unclear if magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine should be included in the workup of patients with pulmonary dysfunction. A systematic review of the current literature was conducted on the topic to provide an outline of the body of knowledge and some guidance for neurosurgeons that receive these patient referrals.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted through the PubMed database to identify articles related to phrenic nerve dysfunction secondary to cervical stenosis.
RESULTS
A total of 12 case reports were found. The median subject age was 64 years, 11 were male. Presenting symptoms included shortness of breath (n = 9), radiculopathy (n = 7), myelopathy (n = 5), reduced pulmonary function (n = 6), weakness (n = 4), and neck pain (n = 5). Ten of these patients underwent surgical intervention, all having improvements in their pulmonary and neurological symptoms at follow-up ranging from 10 days to 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS
Cervical stenosis, resulting in neuroforaminal stenosis, may be related to phrenic nerve dysfunction in select patients with idiopathic diaphragmatic paralysis or pulmonary dysfunction. Surgical decompression improves pulmonary and neurological symptoms.
Topics: Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Female; Constriction, Pathologic; Phrenic Nerve; Spinal Cord Diseases; Cervical Vertebrae; Respiratory Paralysis
PubMed: 36089276
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.009 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Jun 2016Case reports, case series and case control studies have looked at the use of phrenic nerve stimulators in the setting of high spinal cord injuries and central... (Review)
Review
Evaluating the evidence: is phrenic nerve stimulation a safe and effective tool for decreasing ventilator dependence in patients with high cervical spinal cord injuries and central hypoventilation?
INTRODUCTION
Case reports, case series and case control studies have looked at the use of phrenic nerve stimulators in the setting of high spinal cord injuries and central hypoventilation syndromes dating back to the 1980s. We evaluated the evidence related to this topic by performing a systematic review of the published literature.
METHODS
Search terms "phrenic nerve stimulation," "phrenic nerve and spinal cord injury," and "phrenic nerve and central hypoventilation" were entered into standard search engines in a systematic fashion. Articles were reviewed by two study authors and graded independently for class of evidence according to published guidelines. The published evidence was reviewed, and the overall body of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assesment, development and evaluations (GRADE) criteria Balshem et al. (J Clin Epidemiol 64:401-406, 2011).
RESULTS
Our initial search yielded 420 articles. There were no class I, II, or III studies. There were 18 relevant class IV articles. There were no discrepancies among article ratings (i.e., kappa = 1). A meta-analysis could not be performed due to the low quality of the available evidence. The overall quality of the body of evidence was evaluated using GRADE criteria and fell within the "very poor" category.
CONCLUSION
The quality of the published literature for phrenic nerve stimulation is poor. Our review of the literature suggests that phrenic nerve stimulation is a safe and effective option for decreasing ventilator dependence in high spinal cord injuries and central hypoventilation; however, we are left with critical questions that provide crucial directions for future studies.
Topics: Cervical Vertebrae; Databases, Bibliographic; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Humans; Hypoventilation; Phrenic Nerve; Spinal Cord Injuries
PubMed: 27083568
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-016-3086-2