-
Systematic Reviews Dec 2020Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Accumulating evidence suggests a potentially important role of colorectal infection with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Accumulating evidence suggests a potentially important role of colorectal infection with Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum) in colorectal carcinogenesis. We conducted a systematic review, including both a qualitative synthesis and a meta-analysis, to synthesize the evidence from the epidemiological literature on the association between F. nucleatum detection in the colon/rectum and CRC.
METHODS
A systematic literature search of Ovid MEDLINE(R), Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, EBM Reviews-Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL Plus with Full Text was conducted using earliest inclusive dates up to 4 October 2020. Eligible studies were original, comparative observational studies that reported results on colorectal F. nucleatum detection and CRC. Two independent reviewers extracted the relevant information. Odds ratio (OR) estimates were pooled across studies using the random effects model. Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to critically appraise study quality.
RESULTS
Twenty-four studies were included in the systematic review, of which 12 were included in the meta-analysis. Studies investigated F. nucleatum in feces, colorectal tissue samples, or both. In most studies included in the systematic review, the load of F. nucleatum was higher, on average, in specimens from CRC patients than in those from CRC-free controls. Meta-analysis showed a positive association between F. nucleatum detection in colorectal specimens and CRC (OR = 8.3; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 5.2 to 13.0).
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this systematic review suggest that F. nucleatum in the colon/rectum is associated with CRC.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
This systematic review protocol has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on July 10, 2018 (registration number CRD42018095866).
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Feces; Fusobacterium nucleatum; Humans; Mucous Membrane; Risk Factors
PubMed: 33272322
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01526-z -
Animal Microbiome Jun 2021Undesirable microbial infiltration into the female bovine reproductive tracts, for example during calving or mating, is likely to disturb the commensal microflora.... (Review)
Review
Undesirable microbial infiltration into the female bovine reproductive tracts, for example during calving or mating, is likely to disturb the commensal microflora. Persistent establishment and overgrowth of certain pathogens induce reproductive diseases, render the female bovine reproductive tract unfavourable for pregnancy or can result in transmission to the foetus, leading to death and abortion or birth abnormalities. This review of culture-independent metagenomics studies revealed that normal microflora in the female bovine reproductive tract is reasonably consistently dominated by bacteria from the phyla Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, following by Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria and Tenericutes. Reproductive disease development in the female bovine reproductive tract was demonstrated across multiple studies to be associated with high relative abundances of bacteria from the phyla Bacteroidetes and Fusobacteria. Reduced bacterial diversity in the reproductive tract microbiome in some studies of cows diagnosed with reproductive diseases also indicated an association between dysbiosis and bovine reproductive health. Nonetheless, the bovine genital tract microbiome remains underexplored, and this is especially true for the male genital tract. Future research should focus on the functional aspects of the bovine reproductive tract microbiomes, for example their contributions to cattle fertility and susceptibility towards reproductive diseases.
PubMed: 34108039
DOI: 10.1186/s42523-021-00106-3 -
International Journal of Environmental... Nov 2022The implementation of adjunctive antibiotics has been recommended for the therapy of peri-implantitis (PI). In this review, antibiotic resistance patterns in PI patients... (Review)
Review
The implementation of adjunctive antibiotics has been recommended for the therapy of peri-implantitis (PI). In this review, antibiotic resistance patterns in PI patients were assessed. A systematic scoping review of observational studies and trials was established in conjunction with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. The SCOPUS, PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCIELO, Web of Science, and LILACS databases were reviewed along with the gray literature. The primary electronic examination produced 139 investigations. Finally, four observational studies met the selection criteria. These studies evaluated 214 implants in 168 patients. and mainly presented high resistance to tetracycline, metronidazole, and erythromycin in PI patients. Similarly, was also highly resistant to clindamycin and doxycycline. Other microorganisms such as , , and also presented significant levels of resistance to other antibiotics including amoxicillin, azithromycin, and moxifloxacin. However, most microorganisms did not show resistance to the combination amoxicillin metronidazole. Although the management of adjunctive antimicrobials in the therapy of PI is controversial, in this review, the resistance of relevant microorganisms to antibiotics used to treat PI, and usually prescribed in dentistry, was observed. Clinicians should consider the antibiotic resistance demonstrated in the treatment of PI patients and its public health consequences.
Topics: Humans; Peri-Implantitis; Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Fusobacterium nucleatum; Porphyromonas gingivalis; Amoxicillin; Metronidazole; Anti-Bacterial Agents
PubMed: 36497685
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192315609 -
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &... Mar 2020The gut microbiome, in particular , has been reported to play a role in colorectal cancer development and in patient prognosis. We aimed to perform a systematic review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The gut microbiome, in particular , has been reported to play a role in colorectal cancer development and in patient prognosis. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to assess the prevalence of in colorectal tumors and evaluate the association between and colorectal cancer development and prognosis.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies published until January 2019. Random effects meta-analyses were used to assess the prevalence of in patients with colorectal cancer or tissues relative to controls and survival in -positive versus -negative patients.
RESULTS
Forty-five relevant articles were identified. Meta-analyses indicated higher odds of being present in colorectal tissue samples from patients with colorectal cancer [ = 6 studies, pooled OR = 10.06; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 4.48-22.58] and individuals with colorectal polyps ( = 5 studies, pooled OR = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.07-3.16) compared with healthy controls. Similar results were apparent in fecal samples, and when comparing tumor with adjacent normal tissue. Meta-analyses indicated poorer survival in patients with colorectal cancer with high versus low abundance ( = 5 studies, pooled HR = 1.87; 95% CI, 1.12-3.11).
CONCLUSIONS
A consistent increase in the prevalence and/or abundance of in colorectal cancer tissue and fecal samples compared with controls was apparent. High abundance of in colorectal tumors was also associated with poorer overall survival.
IMPACT
could be useful as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for colorectal cancer or as a treatment target.
Topics: Colon; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Feces; Fusobacterium Infections; Fusobacterium nucleatum; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Prognosis; Rectum; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors
PubMed: 31915144
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1295 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Feb 2024The gastrointestinal bile acid (BA)/microbiota axis has emerged as a potential mediator of health and disease, particularly in relation to pathologies such as... (Review)
Review
AIM
The gastrointestinal bile acid (BA)/microbiota axis has emerged as a potential mediator of health and disease, particularly in relation to pathologies such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colorectal cancer. Whilst it presents an exciting new avenue for therapies, it has not yet been characterized in surgical resection of the ileum, where BA reabsorption occurs. The identification of BA/microbiota signatures may provide future therapies with perioperative personalized medicine. In this work we conduct a systematic review with the aim of investigating the microbiome and BA changes that are associated with resection of the ileum.
METHOD
The databases included were MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane libraries. The outcomes of interest were faecal microbiome and BA signatures after ileal resection.
RESULTS
Of the initial 3106 articles, three studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria for data extraction. A total of 257 patients (46% surgery, 54% nonsurgery controls) were included in the three studies. Two studies included patients with short bowel syndrome and the other included patients with IBD. Large-scale microbiota changes were reported. In general, alpha diversity had decreased amongst patients with ileal surgery. Phylum-level changes included decreased Bacteroidetes and increased Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria in patients with an intestinal resection. Surgery was associated with increased total faecal BAs, cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid. There were decreases in deoxycholic acid and glycine and taurine conjugated bile salts. Integrated BA and microbiota data identified correlations with several bacterial families and BA.
CONCLUSION
The BA/microbiota axis is still a novel area with minimal observational data in surgery. Further mechanistic research is necessary to further explore this and identify its role in improving perioperative outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Bile Acids and Salts; Intestines; Microbiota; Ileum; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
PubMed: 38177086
DOI: 10.1111/codi.16837 -
Revista Espanola de Enfermedades... Nov 2015The human colonic mucosa is populated by a wide range of microorganisms, usually in a symbiotic relation with the host. Sometimes this balance is lost and a state of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIM
The human colonic mucosa is populated by a wide range of microorganisms, usually in a symbiotic relation with the host. Sometimes this balance is lost and a state of dysbiosis arises, exposing the colon to different metabolic and inflammatory stimuli (according to the microbiota's changing profile). Recent findings lead to hypothesize that this unbalance may create a subclinical pro-inflammatory state that increases DNA mutations and, therefore, colorectal carcinogenesis. In this article we aim to systematically review the scientific evidence regarding colonic microbiota and its role in colorectal carcinogenesis.
METHODS
Systematic review of PubMed searching results for original articles studying microbiota and colorectal cancer until November 2014.
RESULTS
Thirty-one original articles studied the role of colon microbiota in colorectal carcinoma including both human and animal studies. Different and heterogeneous methods were used and different bacteria were considered. Nevertheless, some bacteria are consistently augmented (such as Fusobacteria, Alistipes, Porphyromonadaceae, Coriobacteridae, Staphylococcaceae, Akkermansia spp. and Methanobacteriales), while other are constantly diminished in colorectal cancer (such as Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium spp., Roseburia, and Treponema). Moreover, bacteria metabolites amino acids are increased and butyrate is decreased throughout colonic carcinogenesis.
CONCLUSION
Conclusive evidence shows that colorectal carcinogenesis is associated with microbial dysbiosis. This information may be used to create new prophylactic, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for colorectal cancer.
Topics: Animals; Carcinogenesis; Colon; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dysbiosis; Humans; Microbiota
PubMed: 26541655
DOI: 10.17235/reed.2015.3830/2015 -
Acta Clinica Belgica Oct 2022Rat bite fever is a rare disease with a challenging differential diagnosis. The zoonosis has a potentially lethal course in a vulnerable population (children and low...
CONTEXT
Rat bite fever is a rare disease with a challenging differential diagnosis. The zoonosis has a potentially lethal course in a vulnerable population (children and low socioeconomic class) and a commonly available standard therapy (penicillin). This case report review outlines common epidemiological and clinical factors to improve clinical awareness and timely response to therapeutic actions.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted in the PubMed database looking for English language European case reports of rat bite fever from 2000 to 2021.
RESULTS
In 17 out of 20 selected cases, the condition of the index patient was identified as an infectious syndrome. Thanks to the almost omnisensitive susceptibility pattern of , timely antibiotic administration prevented an unfavorable outcome in all these cases. However, in the three remaining cases, the initial diagnoses were arthritis (on autoimmune basis and gout) and viral syndrome. Due to delayed antibiotic administration, one case suffered persistent harm, while the other two cases encountered prolonged illness.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Rat bite fever is a diagnosis that can be easily missed from both a clinical and a microbiological point of view. As such, rat bite fever becomes part of the differential diagnosis whenever a patient presents with a fever syndrome after being in contact with rodents. In the case of persistent fever, blood culture sampling should be performed even in the absence of a systemic inflammatory response. A bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA PCR on blood or joint aspiration (cultures) is an even more sensitive diagnostic test. Since most transmissions occurred in a domestic setting, keeping rats as pets cannot be recommended.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Humans; Penicillins; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; Rat-Bite Fever; Rats; Streptobacillus; Zoonoses
PubMed: 34672901
DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2021.1992940 -
Archives of Oral Biology Sep 2021To review published oral microbiome studies and create a comprehensive list of bacterial species found in saliva and dental plaque among healthy children and adults... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To review published oral microbiome studies and create a comprehensive list of bacterial species found in saliva and dental plaque among healthy children and adults associated with presence of carious lesions and caries-free state (oral health).
DESIGN
This review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. We searched published studies querying PUBMED and EMBASE using the following keywords: (plaque OR saliva) AND caries AND (next generation sequencing OR checkerboard OR 16s rRNA or qPCR). Studies were limited to human studies published in English between January 1, 2010 and June 24, 2020 that included > 10 caries-active and > 10 caries-free participants, and assessed the entire bacterial community.
RESULTS
Our search strategy identified 298 articles. After exclusion criteria, 22 articles remained; we considered 2 studies that examined saliva and plaque as separate studies, for a total of 24 studies. Species associated with caries or oral health varied widely among studies reviewed, with notable differences by age and biologic sample type. No bacterial species was associated with caries in all studies. Streptococcus mutans was found more frequently among those with caries (14/24 (58.3 %)) and Fusobacterium periodonticum was found more frequently among those that were caries-free (5/24 (20.8 %)).
CONCLUSION
No bacterial species was associated with caries or oral health across all studies supporting multiple pathways to cariogenesis. However, the variation may be due to sampling at different time points during caries development, varying methods of specimen sampling, storage, sequencing or analysis or differences in host factors such as age.
Topics: Adult; Child; Dental Caries; Fusobacterium; Humans; Mouth; Oral Health; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; Saliva; Streptococcus mutans
PubMed: 34246103
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105204 -
European Journal of Clinical... Dec 2016The purpose of this study was to review the current evidence for an association between Fusobacterium necrophorum (FN) and acute tonsillitis (AT), to assess the... (Review)
Review
A systematic review of Fusobacterium necrophorum-positive acute tonsillitis: prevalence, methods of detection, patient characteristics, and the usefulness of the Centor score.
The purpose of this study was to review the current evidence for an association between Fusobacterium necrophorum (FN) and acute tonsillitis (AT), to assess the prevalence of FN in AT, to identify the better FN detection method, and to characterize the clinical characteristics of FN-positive patients with uncomplicated AT. A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and SweMed+ databases for studies reporting on the recovery rates of FN in patients with AT. A total of 498 unique records were identified. Eleven studies were included in a qualitative synthesis and six studies were included in a meta-analysis. Considerable heterogeneity (I = 60 %) and risk of bias and confounders was found among the studies, though a subset of studies (prospective) had lower heterogeneity and higher study quality. FN was recovered significantly more frequently from patients (21.2 %) compared to healthy controls (7.6 %) (p < 0.001). FN recovery rates were similar between culture-based studies (20.3 %) and studies using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methodology (22.2 %) (p = 0.462). The typical FN-positive AT patient was a smoking young (15-25 years) male presenting with tonsillar exudates and a Centor score of 2 or higher. A clear association between FN and AT was found. FN is likely to be a significant and prevalent pathogen in AT, especially in teenagers and young adults. However, no evidence for causality between FN and AT has been established and it is unexplored if timely antibiotic therapy directed against FN accelerates the resolution of symptoms and decreases the risk of complications.
Topics: Fusobacterium Infections; Fusobacterium necrophorum; Humans; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Tonsillitis
PubMed: 27568201
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-016-2757-y -
Journal of Reproductive Immunology Feb 2022To assess the available scientific evidence regarding the placental microbial composition of a healthy pregnancy, the quality of this evidence, and the potential...
OBJECTIVE
To assess the available scientific evidence regarding the placental microbial composition of a healthy pregnancy, the quality of this evidence, and the potential relation between placental and oral microbiome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data sources: MEDLINE and EMBASE up to August 1, 2019.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Human subjects; healthy women; term deliveries; healthy normal birth weight; assessment of microorganisms (bacteria) in placental tissue; full research papers in English. The quality of the included studies was assessed by a modified Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies.
RESULTS
57 studies passed the inclusion criteria. Of these, 33 had a high risk of quality bias (e.g., insufficient infection control, lack of negative controls, poor description of the healthy cases). The remaining 24 studies had a low (N = 12) to moderate (N = 12) risk of bias and were selected for in-depth analysis. Of these 24 studies, 22 reported microorganisms in placental tissues, where Lactobacillus (11 studies), Ureaplasma (7), Fusobacterium (7), Staphylococcus (7), Prevotella (6) and Streptococcus (6) were among the most frequently identified genera. Methylobacterium (4), Propionibacterium (3), Pseudomonas (3) and Escherichia (2), among others, although frequently reported in placental samples, were often reported as contaminants in studies that used negative controls.
CONCLUSIONS
The results support the existence of a low biomass placental microbiota in healthy pregnancies. Some of the microbial taxa found in the placenta might have an oral origin. The high risk of quality bias for the majority of the included studies indicates that the results of individual papers should be interpreted with caution.
Topics: Adult; Animals; Female; Fusobacterium; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Lactobacillus; Microbiota; Placenta; Pregnancy; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; Ureaplasma
PubMed: 34883392
DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2021.103455