-
The Journal of Medical Investigation :... 2023This study aimed to conduct a systematic review to clarify patient understanding, understanding of caring concepts, understanding of technology, competency to express...
This study aimed to conduct a systematic review to clarify patient understanding, understanding of caring concepts, understanding of technology, competency to express compassion, appropriate involvement in caring, and ethical and moral attitudes and responses toward patients. This systematic review was conducted through an electronic search across PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, and Science Direct. Authors independently appraised the methodological quality of the studies using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis approach was used to present these findings. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and quality appraisal guidelines. Through thematic analysis, four major themes were identified:Technology and caring competency, Technology and patient-centered care, Empathetic skills, and Caring competency. This review has shown that patients choose physicians considering their emotions and communicate well with them, empowering them to take responsibility of their own or their loved ones' healthcare. In the age of technological advancement and availability of vast sources of information, it is expected of physicians to adapt to these character priorities while maintaining their sense of humanness, not only focusing on healing modalities, but also to guide, educate, and appropriately empower their patients toward achieving their healthcare goals. J. Med. Invest. 70 : 307-316, August, 2023.
Topics: Humans; Technology; Empathy; Physicians; Patient-Centered Care; Health Facilities
PubMed: 37940512
DOI: 10.2152/jmi.70.307 -
JAMA Oncology Jun 2019Significant controversy exists regarding whether physicians factor personal financial considerations into their clinical decision making. Within oncology, several...
IMPORTANCE
Significant controversy exists regarding whether physicians factor personal financial considerations into their clinical decision making. Within oncology, several reimbursement policies may incentivize physicians to increase health care use.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether the financial incentives presented by oncology reimbursement policies affect physician practice patterns.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
Studies evaluating an association between reimbursement incentives and changes in reimbursement policy on oncology care delivery were reviewed. Articles were identified systematically by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Proquest Health Management, Econlit, and Business Source Premier. English-language articles focused on the US health care system that made empirical estimates of the association between a measurement of physician reimbursement/compensation and a measurement of delivery of cancer treatment services were included. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool was used to assess risk of bias. There were no date restrictions on the publications, and literature searches were finalized on February 14, 2018.
FINDINGS
Eighteen studies were included. All were observational cohort studies, and most had a moderate risk of bias. Heterogeneity of reimbursement policies and outcomes precluded meta-analysis; therefore, a qualitative synthesis was performed. Most studies (15 of 18 [83%]) reported an association between reimbursement and care delivery consistent with physician responsiveness to financial incentives, although such an association was not identified in all studies. Findings consistently suggested that self-referral arrangements may increase use of radiotherapy and that profitability of systemic anticancer agents may affect physicians' choice of drug. Findings were less conclusive as to whether profitability of systemic anticancer therapy affects the decision of whether to use any systemic therapy.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
To date, this study is the first systematic review of reimbursement policy and clinical care delivery in oncology. The findings suggest that some oncologists may, in certain circumstances, alter treatment recommendations based on personal revenue considerations. An implication of this finding is that value-based reimbursement policies may be a useful tool to better align physician incentives with patient need and increase the value of oncology care.
Topics: Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Oncologists; Physician Self-Referral; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Reimbursement, Incentive
PubMed: 30605222
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6196 -
Medical Care Aug 2021Burnout (BO) is a serious phenomenon affecting US physicians. Female physicians, now accounting for a larger share of the workforce, are thought to experience higher...
PURPOSE
Burnout (BO) is a serious phenomenon affecting US physicians. Female physicians, now accounting for a larger share of the workforce, are thought to experience higher levels of BO in some situations compared with their male counterparts. The current review aimed to systematically examine extant literature on physician BO as it relates especially to the female physician.
METHODS
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guided search of 4 databases yielding empirical studies with relevant findings regarding female physician BO, published during the time period 2010-2019.
RESULTS
A total of 43 studies were included in the current review. Both male and female doctors have higher percentages of burned out doctors, with a third or more of each group indicating BO in each of the studies examined. These higher levels of BO remained regardless of where physicians worked, their clinical specialty, workloads, or age. However, the review supports the notion that for women doctors, there is generally a higher likelihood of experiencing BO compared with male doctors, particular with respect to the emotional exhaustion dimension of BO.
CONCLUSIONS
BO is important for both female and male physicians; although women doctors may experience it to a greater degree. Women doctors will benefit from talent management approaches by health care organizations that recognize their greater tendency to BO compared with men. These approaches should be aimed at ameliorating the factors that give rise to feelings of emotional exhaustion in particular. Additional research is needed to better understand the full extent to which physician gender plays a role in BO.
Topics: Burnout, Professional; Emotions; Female; Humans; Job Satisfaction; Male; Occupational Stress; Physicians; Sex Factors; Workload
PubMed: 34081678
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001584 -
PloS One 2014Over the last decades, trust in physician has gained in importance. Studies have shown that trust in physician is associated with positive health behaviors in patients.... (Review)
Review
Over the last decades, trust in physician has gained in importance. Studies have shown that trust in physician is associated with positive health behaviors in patients. However, the validity of empirical findings fundamentally depends on the quality of the measures in use. Our aim was to provide an overview of trust in physician measures and to evaluate the methodological quality of the psychometric studies and the quality of psychometric properties of identified measures. We conducted an electronic search in three databases (Medline, EMBASE and PsycInfo). The secondary search strategy included reference and citation tracking of included full texts and consultation of experts in the field. Retrieved records were screened independently by two reviewers. Full texts that reported on testing of psychometric properties of trust in physician measures were included in the review. Study characteristics and psychometric properties were extracted. We evaluated the quality of design, methods and reporting of studies with the COnsensus based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. The quality of psychometric properties was assessed with Terwee's 2007 quality criteria. After screening 3284 records and assessing 169 full texts for eligibility, fourteen studies on seven trust in physician measures were included. Most of the studies were conducted in the USA and used English measures. All but one measure were generic. Sample sizes range from 25 to 1199 participants, recruited in very heterogeneous settings. Quality assessments revealed several flaws in the methodological quality of studies. COSMIN scores were mainly fair or poor. The overall quality of measures' psychometric properties was intermediate. Several trust in physician measures have been developed over the last years, but further psychometric evaluation of these measures is strongly recommended. The methodological quality of psychometric property studies could be improved by adhering to quality criteria like the COSMIN checklist.
Topics: Humans; Physicians; Psychometrics; Trust
PubMed: 25208074
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106844 -
World Journal of Surgery Jun 2017Regret is a powerful motivating factor in medical decision making among patients and surgeons. Regret can be particularly important for surgical decisions, which often... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Regret is a powerful motivating factor in medical decision making among patients and surgeons. Regret can be particularly important for surgical decisions, which often carry significant risk and may have uncertain outcomes. We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on patient and physician regret in the surgical setting.
METHODS
A search of the English literature between 1986 and 2016 that examined patient and physician self-reported decisional regret was carried out using the MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases. Clinical studies performed in patients and physicians participating in elective surgical treatment were included.
RESULTS
Of 889 studies identified, 73 patient studies and 6 physician studies met inclusion criteria. Among the 73 patient studies, 57.5% examined patients with a cancer diagnosis, with breast (26.0%) and prostate (28.8%) cancers being most common. Interestingly, self-reported patient regret was relatively uncommon with an average prevalence across studies of 14.4%. Factors most often associated with regret included type of surgery, disease-specific quality of life, and shared decision making. Only 6 studies were identified that focused on physician regret; 2 pertained to surgical decision making. These studies primarily measured regret of omission and commission using hypothetical case scenarios and used the results to develop decision curve analysis tools.
CONCLUSION
Self-reported decisional regret was present in about 1 in 7 surgical patients. Factors associated with regret were both patient- and procedure related. While most studies focused on patient regret, little data exist on how physician regret affects shared decision making.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Attitude of Health Personnel; Attitude to Health; Decision Making; Elective Surgical Procedures; Emotions; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Surgeons; Surgical Procedures, Operative
PubMed: 28243695
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-3895-9 -
BMJ Open Dec 2022Many physicians complete medical school and graduate medical education (GME) burdened by high debt and financial illiteracy. This places them at increased risk for... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Many physicians complete medical school and graduate medical education (GME) burdened by high debt and financial illiteracy. This places them at increased risk for ill-informed financial decisions, which can result in increased stress and anxiety and a lower quality of life. Furthermore, financial concerns impact physicians' specialty selections and may partly explain the scarcity of primary care practitioners. In response, medical wellness programmes have increasingly sought to offer personal finance education, but there is little guidance on optimal curricula. Our objective is to systematically review the existing literature examining physician financial literacy curricula and to recommend a standardised personal finance curriculum.
METHODS
This review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 checklist to report the results of literature searches in PubMed, ERIC, MedEdPortal, EBSCO, JSTOR and Google Scholar. Three researchers used predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria to select articles, including a focus on financial concepts applicable in the USA. Selected articles published between 2000 and 2022 were assessed using the BEME strength of findings tool, and further assessed using modified Côté-Turgeon and Kirkpatrick model qualitative analyses tools.
FINDINGS
49 articles met all inclusion criteria. Ten specifically described personal finance literacy curricula for medical students or GME trainees, with varied criteria for selecting instructors, topics and outcomes. All studies reported that audiences were ill prepared for making financial decisions but strongly desired financial literacy education. Qualitative analysis revealed Strength of Findings summary scores ranging from 2 to 4, while applicable Kirkpatrick Model scores were all 3 or greater. Based on these findings, a 14-module personal finance curriculum is proposed by the researchers, along with learning objectives.
INTERPRETATION
Although medical students and GME trainees value financial literacy, few publications report the impact of actual curricula. These efforts vary in depth, breadth and measured impact. Future research should focus on development of valid testing instruments specifically for physicians, content standardisation, selection of credible instructors and delivery formats.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Curriculum; Education, Medical, Graduate; Learning; Physicians
PubMed: 36572491
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064733 -
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision... Sep 2022Providing electronic health data to medical practitioners to reflect on their performance can lead to improved clinical performance and quality of care. Understanding...
Providing electronic health data to medical practitioners to reflect on their performance can lead to improved clinical performance and quality of care. Understanding the sensemaking process that is enacted when practitioners are presented with such data is vital to ensure an improvement in performance. Thus, the primary objective of this research was to explore physician and surgeon sensemaking when presented with electronic health data associated with their clinical performance. A systematic literature review was conducted to analyse qualitative research that explored physicians and surgeons experiences with electronic health data associated with their clinical performance published between January 2010 and March 2022. Included articles were assessed for quality, thematically synthesised, and discussed from the perspective of sensemaking. The initial search strategy for this review returned 8,829 articles that were screened at title and abstract level. Subsequent screening found 11 articles that met the eligibility criteria and were retained for analyses. Two articles met all of the standards within the chosen quality assessment (Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research, SRQR). Thematic synthesis generated five overarching themes: data communication, performance reflection, infrastructure, data quality, and risks. The confidence of such findings is reported using CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research). The way the data is communicated can impact sensemaking which has implications on what is learned and has impact on future performance. Many factors including data accuracy, validity, infrastructure, culture can also impact sensemaking and have ramifications on future practice. Providing data in order to support performance reflection is not without risks, both behavioural and affective. The latter of which can impact the practitioner's ability to effectively make sense of the data. An important consideration when data is presented with the intent to improve performance.Registration This systematic review was registered with Prospero, registration number: CRD42020197392.
Topics: Communication; Delivery of Health Care; Health Personnel; Humans; Qualitative Research; Surgeons
PubMed: 36171583
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-01997-1 -
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Aug 2022The primary purpose of this review was to evaluate patient and physician preference and satisfaction for teleconsultation in orthopaedic surgery compared to traditional... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The primary purpose of this review was to evaluate patient and physician preference and satisfaction for teleconsultation in orthopaedic surgery compared to traditional face-to-face consultation. In addition, we evaluated the effects of teleconsultation on patient length of visit, healthcare costs, range of motion (ROM), pain, quality of life (QOL), and ongoing management plans.
METHODS
A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Randomised control trials and case control studies comparing teleconsultation with traditional, face-to-face consultation in the management of orthopaedic conditions were included. The primary outcome measures were patient and physician preference and satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included patient length of visit, healthcare costs, ROM, pain, QOL, and ongoing management plans.
RESULTS
A total of 13 articles meeting the eligibility criteria were included for systematic review and 8 for meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction, length of visit, or time spent with the physician between the telemedicine and in-office control group. The mean difference of patient preference for telemedicine was significantly higher in the telemedicine group compared to the in-office visit group (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.12-1.87, = 0.005).
DISCUSSION
Telemedicine was not inferior to face-to-face office visits in regard to patient and physician preference and satisfaction. Therefore, it would be an effective adjunct to face-to-face office visits, serving as a mechanism of triage and long-term continuity of care.
Topics: Humans; Orthopedic Procedures; Orthopedics; Pain; Physicians; Quality of Life; Remote Consultation; Videoconferencing
PubMed: 32873138
DOI: 10.1177/1357633X20950995 -
Nephron. Clinical Practice 2011Renal practitioners are expected to apply the best available evidence from rigorous scientific research to clinical decision-making and also for policy-making for those... (Review)
Review
Renal practitioners are expected to apply the best available evidence from rigorous scientific research to clinical decision-making and also for policy-making for those involved. Advances in information technology and unprecedented access to data have simplified the process for the search of best available evidence to guide practice. However, it is challenging to cope with the increasing volume of publications in nephrology and other areas of medicine. Accordingly, systematic reviews and meta-analysis have greatly facilitated best practice and effective clinical decision-making. Conducting a systematic review/meta-analysis involves a number of steps that start with protocol development and research question formulation, design and study selection criteria, followed by retrieval of potentially relevant studies, selection of those studies to be included and evaluation of a study's risk of bias. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have both strengths and weaknesses. Many of the perceived limitations of meta-analysis are not inherent in the methodology, but actually represent deficits in the conduct or reporting of individual primary studies. With the continuous proliferation of published renal clinical studies, such publications will continue to be an important resource for clinicians and researchers in nephrology. It is therefore important for nephrologists to keep abreast of developments in this field, which requires some knowledge about how these studies are conducted, reported and how to appraise them for application to clinical practice or policy-making.
Topics: Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Nephrology; Physicians; Review Literature as Topic
PubMed: 21677439
DOI: 10.1159/000324432 -
Medical Care Research and Review : MCRR Oct 2020The well-being of the health care workforce has emerged as both a major concern and as a component of the "quadruple aim" to enable the "triple aim" of improving patient...
The well-being of the health care workforce has emerged as both a major concern and as a component of the "quadruple aim" to enable the "triple aim" of improving patient experiences, reducing costs, and improving population health. Physician burnout is problematic given its effects on physicians, patients, health care organizations, and society. Using conservation of resources theory as a frame, we conducted a systematic review of the empirical literature on the relationship of physician burnout with physician personal and professional outcomes that includes 43 articles. Nine outcomes were organized into three categories illustrating burnout as a dynamic loss spiral rather than a static end-state. Findings show that emotional exhaustion had the greatest impact with the outcomes explored, while depersonalization and lack of professional accomplishment manifested fewer associations. The results suggest that burnout is a complex, dynamic phenomenon, which unfolds over time. Future research and implications of these results are discussed.
Topics: Burnout, Professional; Burnout, Psychological; Emotions; Humans; Physicians
PubMed: 31216940
DOI: 10.1177/1077558719856787