-
The Lancet. Haematology Oct 2016Whether high-dose dexamethasone has long-term efficacy and safety in previously untreated patients with immune thrombocytopenia is unclear. We did a systematic review... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
BACKGROUND
Whether high-dose dexamethasone has long-term efficacy and safety in previously untreated patients with immune thrombocytopenia is unclear. We did a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomised trials to establish the effect of high-dose dexamethasone compared with prednisone for long-term platelet count response.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library Database for papers published from 1970 to July, 2016, and abstracts from American Society of Hematology annual meetings published from 2004 to 2015 for randomised trials comparing different corticosteroid regimens for patients with previously untreated immune thrombocytopenia who achieved a platelet count response. Trials that compared corticosteroids exclusively with other interventions were excluded. The primary endpoint was overall (platelets >30 × 10/L) and complete (platelets >100 × 10/L) platelet count response at 6 months with high-dose dexamethasone compared with standard-dose prednisone. Children and adults were analysed separately. Estimates of effect were pooled with a random-effects model.
FINDINGS
Nine randomised trials (n=1138) were included. Of those, five (n=533) compared one to three cycles of dexamethasone (40 mg per day for 4 days) with prednisone (1 mg per kg) for 14-28 days followed by dose tapering in adults. We found no difference in overall platelet count response at 6 months (pooled proportions 54% vs 43%, relative risk [RR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·79-1·71; p=0·44). At 14 days, overall platelet count response was higher with dexamethasone (79% vs 59%, RR 1·22, 95% CI 1·00-1·49; p=0·048). The dexamethasone group had fewer reported toxicities. Long-term response rates were similar when the data were analysed by cumulative corticosteroid dose over the course of treatment. No difference in initial platelet count response was observed with different high-dose corticosteroid regimens in children.
INTERPRETATION
In adults with previously untreated immune thrombocytopenia, high-dose dexamethasone did not improve durable platelet count responses compared with standard-dose prednisone. High-dose dexamethasone might be preferred over prednisone for patients with severe immune thrombocytopenia who require a rapid rise in platelet count.
FUNDING
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and Canadian Blood Services, and Health Canada.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Child; Dexamethasone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Middle Aged; Platelet Count; Prednisone; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Young Adult
PubMed: 27658982
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30109-0 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Feb 2022This study aimed to review pregnancy hypertension clinical practice guidelines to inform international clinical practice and research priorities.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to review pregnancy hypertension clinical practice guidelines to inform international clinical practice and research priorities.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Relevant national and international clinical practice guidelines, 2009-19, published in English, French, Dutch or German.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Following published methods and prospective registration (CRD42019123787), a literature search was updated. CPGs were identified by 2 authors independently who scored quality and usefulness for practice (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument), abstracted data, and resolved any disagreement by consensus.
RESULTS
Of note, 15 of 17 identified clinical practice guidelines (4 international) were deemed "clinically useful" and had recommendations abstracted. The highest Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II scores were from government organizations, and scores have improved over time. The following were consistently recommended: (1) automated blood pressure measurement with devices validated for pregnancy and preeclampsia, reflecting increasing recognition of the prevalence of white-coat hypertension and the potential usefulness of home blood pressure monitoring; (2) use of dipstick proteinuria testing for screening followed by quantitative testing by urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio or 24-hour urine collection; (3) key definitions and most aspects of classification, including a broad definition of preeclampsia (which includes proteinuria and maternal end-organ dysfunction, including headache and visual symptoms and laboratory abnormalities of platelets, creatinine, or liver enzymes) and a recognition that it can worsen after delivery; (4) preeclampsia prevention with aspirin; (5) treatment of severe hypertension, most commonly with intravenous labetalol, oral nifedipine, or intravenous hydralazine; (6) treatment for nonsevere hypertension when undertaken, with oral labetalol (in particular), methyldopa, or nifedipine, with recommendations against the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors; (7) magnesium sulfate for eclampsia treatment and prevention among women with "severe" preeclampsia; (8) antenatal corticosteroids for preterm birth but not hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome; (9) delivery at term for preeclampsia; (10) a focus on usual labor and delivery care but avoidance of ergometrine; and (11) an appreciation that long-term health complications are increased in incidence, mandating lifestyle change and risk factor modification. Lack of uniformity was seen in the following areas: (1) the components of a broad preeclampsia definition (specifically respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms, fetal manifestations, and biomarkers), what constitutes severe preeclampsia, and whether the definition has utility because at present what constitutes severe preeclampsia by some guidelines that mandate proteinuria now defines any preeclampsia for most other clinical practice guidelines; (2) how preeclampsia risk should be identified early in pregnancy, and aspirin administered for preeclampsia prevention, because multivariable models (with biomarkers and ultrasonography added to clinical risk markers) used in this way to guide aspirin therapy can substantially reduce the incidence of preterm preeclampsia; (3) the value of calcium added to aspirin for preeclampsia prevention, particularly for women with low intake and at increased risk of preeclampsia; (4) emerging recommendations to normalize blood pressure with antihypertensive agents even in the absence of comorbidities; (5) fetal neuroprotection as an indication for magnesium sulfate in the absence of "severe" preeclampsia; and (6) timing of birth for chronic and gestational hypertension and preterm preeclampsia.
CONCLUSION
Consistent recommendations should be implemented and audited. Inconsistencies should be the focus of research.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Antihypertensive Agents; Aspirin; Calcium; Delivery, Obstetric; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Magnesium Sulfate; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Proteinuria; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 32828743
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.018 -
Andrologia Mar 2021The updated systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the platelet indices between patients with varicocele and healthy subject. The main purpose of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The updated systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the platelet indices between patients with varicocele and healthy subject. The main purpose of our study was to explore the relationship between platelet and the pathogenesis of varicocele. Databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, and MEDLINE were retrieved to identify studies. Two independent investigators extracted the related information of the included original passages. In order to estimate the difference of varicocele patients and healthy subjects, we applied the standardised mean difference (SMD) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). 1,156 patients and 797 healthy subjects of nine studies met the pre-set inclusion criteria. The estimated SMD in MPV between varicocele patients and healthy subjects was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.29-0.93, p < 0.001). The estimated SMD in MPV between preoperative varicocele patients and post-operative varicocele patients was 0.22 (95% CI: 0.03-0.41, p = 0.02). The estimated SMD in PLT between varicocele patients and healthy subjects was -0.19 (95% CI: -0.28, -0.08, p = 0.001). The available data suggest that a higher MPV level in varicocele patients, and the varicocele operation can normalise the preoperatively elevated mean platelet volume levels. Further researches are needed to investigate the potential role of platelet with varicocele.
Topics: Blood Platelets; Humans; Male; Mean Platelet Volume; Platelet Count; Postoperative Period; Varicocele
PubMed: 33369777
DOI: 10.1111/and.13939 -
Transfusion Medicine Reviews Jan 2018Optimal dose, timing and ratio to red blood cells (RBC) of blood component therapy (fresh frozen plasma [FFP], platelets, cryoprecipitate or fibrinogen concentrate) to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Optimal dose, timing and ratio to red blood cells (RBC) of blood component therapy (fresh frozen plasma [FFP], platelets, cryoprecipitate or fibrinogen concentrate) to reduce morbidity and mortality in critically bleeding patients requiring massive transfusion is unknown. We performed a systematic review for randomized controlled trials (RCT) in MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed the Transfusion Evidence Library and using multiple clinical trials registries to 21 February 2017. Sixteen RCTs were identified: six completed (five in adult trauma patients, one pediatric burn patients) and ten ongoing trials. Of the completed trials: three were feasibility trials, comparing a FFP, platelets and RBC ratio of 1:1:1 to laboratory-guided transfusion practice [n=69], early cryoprecipitate compared to standard practice [n=41], and early fibrinogen concentrate compared to placebo [n=45]; one trial compared the effect of FFP, platelets and RBC ratio of 1:1:1 with 1:1:2 on 24-hour and 30-day mortality [n=680]; one compared whole blood to blood component therapy on 24-hour blood use [n=107]; one compared a FFP to RBC ratio of 1:1 with 1:4 [n=16]. Data from two trials were pooled in a meta-analysis for 28-day mortality because the transfusion ratios achieved were similar. Results from these two trials suggest higher transfusion ratios were associated with transfusion of more FFP and platelets without evidence of significant difference with respect to mortality or morbidity. On the limited evidence available, there is insufficient basis to recommend a 1:1:1 over a 1:1:2 ratio or standard care for adult patients with critical bleeding requiring massive transfusion.
Topics: Adult; Blood Component Transfusion; Blood Transfusion; Child; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Plasma; Platelet Transfusion; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors; Transfusion Reaction
PubMed: 28803752
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2017.06.003 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Jul 2023Many studies have reported the association between platelets and preeclampsia. However, sample sizes were small, and their findings were inconsistent. We conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Many studies have reported the association between platelets and preeclampsia. However, sample sizes were small, and their findings were inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association in pooled samples and in detail.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, NICHD-DASH, LILACS, and Scopus from inception to April 22, 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Observational studies comparing platelet count between women with preeclampsia and normotensive pregnant women were included.
METHODS
The mean differences with 95% confidence interval in platelet count were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using I statistics. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and ProMeta 3 software.
RESULTS
A total of 56 studies comprising 4892 preeclamptic and 9947 normotensive pregnant women were included. Meta-analysis showed that platelet count was significantly lower in women with preeclampsia than in normotensive controls (overall: mean difference, -32.83; 95% confidence interval, -40.13 to -25.52; P<.00001; I=92%; mild preeclampsia: mean difference, -18.65; 95% confidence interval, -27.17 to -10.14; P<.00001; I=84%; severe preeclampsia: mean difference, -42.61; 95% confidence interval, -57.53 to -27.68; P<.00001; I=94%). Significantly lower platelet count was also observed in the second trimester (mean difference, -28.84; 95% confidence interval, -44.59 to -13.08; P=.0003; I=93%), third trimester (mean difference, -40.67; 95% confidence interval, -52.14 to -29.20; P<.00001; I=92%), and before the diagnosis of preeclampsia (mean difference, -18.81; 95% confidence interval, -29.98 to -7.64; P=.009; I=87%), but not in the first trimester (mean difference, -15.14; 95% confidence interval, -37.71 to 7.43; P=.19; I=71%). Overall, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of platelet count were 0.71 and 0.77, respectively. The area under the curve was 0.80.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis confirmed that platelet count was significantly lower in preeclamptic women, irrespective of severity and presence or absence of associated complications, even before the onset of preeclampsia and in the second trimester of pregnancy. Our findings suggest that platelet count may be a potential marker to identify and predict preeclampsia.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Pre-Eclampsia; Platelet Count; Blood Pressure; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy Trimester, Third
PubMed: 37098392
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100979 -
The Journal of Infection May 2019To assess the utility of the neutrophil:lymphocyte (NLR), lymphocyte:monocyte (LMR) and platelet:lymphocyte ratios (PLR) as infection biomarkers. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To assess the utility of the neutrophil:lymphocyte (NLR), lymphocyte:monocyte (LMR) and platelet:lymphocyte ratios (PLR) as infection biomarkers.
METHODS
PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched to identify eligible articles. Studies of diagnosis, severity or outcome were included. PROSPERO systematic review registration CRD42017075032.
RESULTS
Forty studies were included, reporting on bacterial and viral infections, malaria, and critical illness due to sepsis. Ten studies reported an association of higher NLR with bacteraemia, supported by meta-analysis of patient-level data (five studies, n = 3320; AUC 0.72, p<0.0001) identifying a cut-off of >12.65. Two studies reported an association with lower LMR and diagnosis of influenza virus infection in patients with respiratory tract infection. Meta-analysis of patient-level data (n = 85; AUC 0.66, p = 0.01) identified a cut-off of ≤2.06. The directionality of associations between NLR and outcomes in heterogeneous cohorts of critically ill adults with sepsis varied. Potential clinical utility was also demonstrated in pneumonia (NLR), pertussis (NLR), urinary tract infection (NLR), diabetic foot infections (NLR) and Crimean Congo Haemorrhagic Fever (PLR). Longitudinal measurement of LMR during respiratory virus infection reflected symptoms and NLR during sepsis and bacteraemia predicted mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
Peripheral blood leucocyte ratios are useful infection biomarkers, with the most evidence related to diagnosis of bacteraemia and influenza virus infection. In critical illness due to sepsis, a signal towards an association with NLR and outcomes exists, and NLR should be evaluated in future stratification models. Longitudinal measurement of ratios during infection could be informative. Overall, these biomarkers warrant further recognition and study in infectious diseases.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers; Child; Child, Preschool; Communicable Diseases; Female; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Leukocyte Count; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult
PubMed: 30802469
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.02.006 -
Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis Feb 2021Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by increased platelet counts. ET has an incidence of 0.6 to 2.5 per 100,000 per year in...
Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by increased platelet counts. ET has an incidence of 0.6 to 2.5 per 100,000 per year in Europe and North America. The disease is characterized by an increased thromboembolic risk, possibly caused by increased platelet counts. Furthermore, increased platelet function and/or increased platelet turnover may play a role. We aimed to explore: (1) whether platelet function and platelet turnover are increased in ET patients compared with healthy controls, and (2) whether these parameters are associated with increased thromboembolic risk and, therefore, may support decision-making on treatment in ET patients. We performed a systematic literature search on March 20, 2020 in Embase and PubMed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. In total, 1,923 articles were identified, 38 of which were included according to prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among the 38 studies, platelet activation (CD36 and CD62P) was investigated in 18 studies and was found to be increased in 12 of these. Platelet aggregation was investigated in 21 studies and was reported to be reduced in 20 of them. Platelet turnover (immature platelet count and mean platelet volume) was investigated in five studies with inconclusive results. No parameters were reported to predict the risk of thromboembolic events. In conclusion, platelet activation was increased in ET patients, but platelet aggregation was reduced. Future studies exploring markers of thromboembolic risk in ET patients are warranted.
Topics: Blood Platelets; Female; Humans; Platelet Function Tests; Thrombocythemia, Essential
PubMed: 33525042
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718873 -
International Journal of Cardiology Aug 2014Platelets with high hemostatic activity play an important role in the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease(CAD) and mean platelet volume(MPV) has been proposed as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Platelets with high hemostatic activity play an important role in the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease(CAD) and mean platelet volume(MPV) has been proposed as an indicator of platelet reactivity. Thus, MPV may emerge as a potential marker of CAD risk. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mean difference in MPV between patients with CAD and controls and pooling the odds ratio of CAD in those with high versus low MPV.
METHODS
Medline and Scopus databases were searched up to 12 March 2013. All observational studies that considered MPV as a study's factor and measured CAD as an outcome were included. Two reviewers independently selected the studies and extracted the data.
RESULTS
Forty studies were included in this meta-analysis. The MPV was significantly larger in patients with CAD than controls with the unstandardized mean difference of 0.70 fL (95% CI: 0.55, 0.85). The unstandardized mean difference of MPV in patients with acute coronary event and in patients with chronic stable angina was 0.84 fL (95% CI: 0.63, 1.04) and 0.46 fL (95% CI: 0.11, 0.81) respectively. Patients with larger MPV (≥7.3 fL) also had a greater odds of having CAD than patients with smaller MPV with a pooled odds ratio of 2.28 (95% CI: 1.46, 3.58).
CONCLUSION
Larger MPV was associated with CAD. Thus, it might be helpful in risk stratification, or improvement of risk prediction if combining it with other risk factors in risk prediction models.
Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Mean Platelet Volume; Observational Studies as Topic; Platelet Count; Risk Factors
PubMed: 25017904
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.06.028 -
Journal of the American Society of... Jul 2021Patients with CKD are at high risk for thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. Abnormalities in platelet function are central to these complications, but reports on...
BACKGROUND
Patients with CKD are at high risk for thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. Abnormalities in platelet function are central to these complications, but reports on platelet function in relation to CKD are conflicting, and vary from decreased platelet reactivity to normal or increased platelet responsiveness. The direct effects of uremic toxins on platelet function have been described, with variable findings.
METHODS
To help clarify how CKD affects platelet function, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of platelet activity in CKD, with a focus on nondialysis-induced effects. We also performed an extensive literature search for the effects of individual uremic toxins on platelet function.
RESULTS
We included 73 studies in the systematic review to assess CKD's overall effect on platelet function in patients; 11 of them described CKD's effect on platelet aggregation and were included in the meta-analysis. Although findings on platelet abnormalities in CKD are inconsistent, bleeding time was mostly prolonged and platelet adhesion mainly reduced. Also, the meta-analysis revealed maximal platelet aggregation was significantly reduced in patients with CKD upon collagen stimulation. We also found that relatively few uremic toxins have been examined for direct effects on platelets ; analyses had varying methods and results, revealing both platelet-stimulatory and inhibitory effects. However, eight of the 12 uremic toxins tested in animal models mostly induced prothrombotic effects.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, most studies report impaired function of platelets from patients with CKD. Still, a substantial number of studies find platelet function to be unchanged or even enhanced. Further investigation of platelet reactivity in CKD, especially during different CKD stages, is warranted.
PubMed: 33941607
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2020101440 -
European Journal of Pediatrics Aug 2023Platelet transfusions (PTx) are the principal approach for treating neonatal thrombocytopenia, a common hematological abnormality affecting neonates, particularly... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Platelet transfusions (PTx) are the principal approach for treating neonatal thrombocytopenia, a common hematological abnormality affecting neonates, particularly preterm infants. However, evidence about the outcomes associated with PTx and whether they provide clinical benefit or harm is lacking. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the association between PTx in preterm infants and mortality, major bleeding, sepsis, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in comparison to not transfusing or using different platelet count thresholds for transfusion. A broad electronic search in three databases was performed in December 2022. We included randomized controlled trials, and cohort and case control studies of preterm infants with thrombocytopenia that (i) compared treatment with platelet transfusion vs. no platelet transfusion, (ii) assessed the platelet count threshold for PTx, or (iii) compared single to multiple PTx. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the association between PTx and mortality, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), sepsis, and NEC and, in the presence of substantial heterogeneity, leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed. We screened 625 abstracts and 50 full texts and identified 18 reports of 13 eligible studies. The qualitative analysis of the included studies revealed controversial results as several studies showed an association between PTx in preterm infants and a higher risk of mortality, major bleeding, sepsis, and NEC, while others did not present a significant relationship. The meta-analysis results suggest a significant association between PTx and mortality (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.8-3.4; p < 0.0001), as well as sepsis (RR 4.5, 95% CI 3.7-5.6; p < 0.0001), after a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. There was also found a significant correlation between PTx and NEC (RR 5.2, 95% CI 3.3-8.3; p < 0.0001). As we were not able to reduce heterogeneity in the assessment of the relationship between PTx and IVH, no conclusion could be taken. Conclusion: Platelet transfusions in preterm infants are associated to a higher risk of death, sepsis, and NEC and, possibly, to a higher incidence of IVH. Further studies are needed to confirm these associations, namely between PTx and IVH, and to define the threshold from which PTx should be given with less harm effect. What is Known: • Platelet transfusions are given to preterm infants with thrombocytopenia either to treat bleeding or to prevent hemorrhage. • Lack of consensual criteria for transfusion. What is New: • A significant association between platelet transfusions and mortality, sepsis, and NEC.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Infant, Premature; Hemorrhage; Enterocolitis, Necrotizing; Thrombocytopenia; Sepsis
PubMed: 37258776
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-05031-y