-
Vox Sanguinis Nov 2016The storage time of platelet products negatively affects bacterial safety and platelet function. However, low maximum storage time increases outdating of valuable... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The storage time of platelet products negatively affects bacterial safety and platelet function. However, low maximum storage time increases outdating of valuable products. Thus, to quantify the effect of platelet storage time on platelet measurements after platelet transfusion, a systematic review and meta-analyses were performed.
METHODS
Reports and meeting abstracts of randomized trials and observational studies, performed in humans, reporting platelet measurements after transfusion of platelet products of different storage times, were selected until February 2016. Meta-analyses were performed for four different storage time contrasts, each answering a different question. Random-effects models were used to account for substantial heterogeneity and the weighted mean differences calculated.
RESULTS
Our search strategy yielded 4234 studies of which 46 papers satisfied the inclusion criteria. As judged by the 1-h corrected count increment, transfusions of fresher platelets compared to stored platelets showed better increment. The weighed mean difference varied from 2·11 (95%CI: 1·51-2·71) to 2·68 (95%CI: 1·92-3·45). For the 24-h corrected count increment, the weighted mean difference varied from 1·36 (95%CI: 0·12-2·60) to 1·68 (95%CI: 1·07-2·28) depending on the contrast. Recovery and survival of old platelets as percentage of fresh platelets were 81% and 73% for the original definition contrast. For the extended storage contrast, recovery and survival were 75% and 68%.
CONCLUSIONS
Fresh platelets were superior to old platelets for all platelet measurements and for all storage time contrasts meta-analysed.
Topics: Blood Platelets; Blood Safety; Humans; Platelet Activation; Platelet Function Tests; Platelet Transfusion; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27564401
DOI: 10.1111/vox.12443 -
Circulation. Cardiovascular... Sep 2023Short-term (≤6 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and DAPT de-escalation become attractive for patients with acute coronary syndrome. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Short-term (≤6 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and DAPT de-escalation become attractive for patients with acute coronary syndrome.
METHODS
A systemic search identified randomized controlled trials that included patients with acute coronary syndrome treated using (1) standard DAPT (12 months) with clopidogrel, prasugrel (standard/low dose), or ticagrelor; (2) extended DAPT (≥18 months); (3) short-term DAPT (≤6 months) followed by P2Y inhibitor or aspirin; (4) 12-month DAPT with unguided de-escalation from potent P2Y inhibitors to low-dose potent P2Y inhibitor or clopidogrel at 1 month; and (5) guided selection DAPT with genotype or platelet function tests. The primary efficacy outcome (major adverse cardiovascular events) was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The primary safety outcome was major or minor bleeding.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 32 randomized controlled trials with 103 497 patients. While there were no differences in efficacy between short, unguided de-escalation and guided selection strategies, unguided de-escalation was associated with reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with standard DAPT with clopidogrel or ticagrelor (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.67 [0.49-0.93] and 0.68 [0.50-0.93]). Both short DAPT followed by P2Y inhibitor and unguided de-escalation were associated with reduced risks in safety compared with other strategies, including guided selection (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.66 [0.47-0.93] and 0.48 [0.33-0.71]). Short DAPT followed by a P2Y inhibitor was associated with reduced risk of major bleeding and all-cause death compared with standard, extended DAPT (eg, versus DAPT with clopidogrel; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.64 [0.42-0.97] and 0.60 [0.44-0.82]). By rankogram, unguided de-escalation strategy was the safest and most effective strategy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events and major or minor bleeding while short DAPT followed by P2Y inhibitor was ranked the best for major bleeding and all-cause death.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with acute coronary syndrome, unguided de-escalation was associated with the lowest risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and major or minor bleeding outcomes, while short DAPT followed by P2Y inhibitor was associated with the lowest risk of major bleeding and all-cause death.
Topics: Humans; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Network Meta-Analysis; Clopidogrel; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37609850
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013242 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2016People with thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow failure are vulnerable to bleeding. Platelet transfusions have limited efficacy in this setting and alternative agents... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Alternative agents to prophylactic platelet transfusion for preventing bleeding in people with thrombocytopenia due to chronic bone marrow failure: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
BACKGROUND
People with thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow failure are vulnerable to bleeding. Platelet transfusions have limited efficacy in this setting and alternative agents that could replace, or reduce platelet transfusion, and are effective at reducing bleeding are needed.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the relative efficacy of different interventions for patients with thrombocytopenia due to chronic bone marrow failure and to derive a hierarchy of potential alternative treatments to platelet transfusions.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (the Cochrane Library 2016, Issue 3), MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), CINAHL (from 1937), the Transfusion Evidence Library (from 1980) and ongoing trial databases to 27 April 2016.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials in people with thrombocytopenia due to chronic bone marrow failure who were allocated to either an alternative to platelet transfusion (artificial platelet substitutes, platelet-poor plasma, fibrinogen concentrate, recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), desmopressin (DDAVP), recombinant factor XIII (rFXIII), recombinant interleukin (rIL)6 or rIL11, or thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics) or a comparator (placebo, standard of care or platelet transfusion). We excluded people undergoing intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transfusion.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed trial quality. We estimated summary risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. We planned to use summary mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. All summary measures are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI).We could not perform a network meta-analysis because the included studies had important differences in the baseline severity of disease for the participants and in the number of participants undergoing chemotherapy. This raised important concerns about the plausibility of the transitivity assumption in the final dataset and we could not evaluate transitivity statistically because of the small number of trials per comparison. Therefore, we could only perform direct pairwise meta-analyses of included interventions.We employed a random-effects model for all analyses. We assessed statistical heterogeneity using the I statistic and its 95% CI. The risk of bias of each study included was assessed using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE methods.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified seven completed trials (472 participants), and four ongoing trials (recruiting 837 participants) which are due to be completed by December 2020. Of the seven completed trials, five trials (456 participants) compared a TPO mimetic versus placebo (four romiplostim trials, and one eltrombopag trial), one trial (eight participants) compared DDAVP with placebo and one trial (eight participants) compared tranexamic acid with placebo. In the DDAVP trial, the only outcome reported was the bleeding time. In the tranexamic acid trial there were methodological flaws and bleeding definitions were subject to significant bias. Consequently, these trials could not be incorporated into the quantitative synthesis. No randomised trial of artificial platelet substitutes, platelet-poor plasma, fibrinogen concentrate, rFVIIa, rFXIII, rIL6 or rIL11 was identified.We assessed all five trials of TPO mimetics included in this review to be at high risk of bias because the trials were funded by the manufacturers of the TPO mimetics and the authors had financial stakes in the sponsoring companies.The GRADE quality of the evidence was very low to moderate across the different outcomes.There was insufficient evidence to detect a difference in the number of participants with at least one bleeding episode between TPO mimetics and placebo (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.31, four trials, 206 participants, low-quality evidence).There was insufficient evidence to detect a difference in the risk of a life-threatening bleed between those treated with a TPO mimetic and placebo (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.26, one trial, 39 participants, low-quality evidence).There was insufficient evidence to detect a difference in the risk of all-cause mortality between those treated with a TPO mimetic and placebo (RR 0.74, 95%CI 0.52 to 1.05, five trials, 456 participants, very low-quality evidence).There was a significant reduction in the number of participants receiving any platelet transfusion between those treated with TPO mimetics and placebo (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.95, four trials, 206 participants, moderate-quality evidence).There was no evidence for a difference in the incidence of transfusion reactions between those treated with TPO mimetics and placebo (pOR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00 to 3.44, one trial, 98 participants, very low-quality evidence).There was no evidence for a difference in thromboembolic events between TPO mimetics and placebo (RR 1.41, 95%CI 0.39 to 5.01, five trials, 456 participants, very-low quality evidence).There was no evidence for a difference in drug reactions between TPO mimetics and placebo (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.51, five trials, 455 participants, low-quality evidence).No trial reported the number of days of bleeding per participant, platelet transfusion episodes, mean red cell transfusions per participant, red cell transfusion episodes, transfusion-transmitted infections, formation of antiplatelet antibodies or platelet refractoriness.In order to demonstrate a reduction in bleeding events from 26 in 100 to 16 in 100 participants, a study would need to recruit 514 participants (80% power, 5% significance).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is insufficient evidence at present for thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics for the prevention of bleeding for people with thrombocytopenia due to chronic bone marrow failure. There is no randomised controlled trial evidence for artificial platelet substitutes, platelet-poor plasma, fibrinogen concentrate, rFVIIa, rFXIII or rIL6 or rIL11, antifibrinolytics or DDAVP in this setting.
Topics: Benzoates; Bone Marrow Diseases; Chronic Disease; Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Hydrazines; Platelet Transfusion; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Fc; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombopoietin; Tranexamic Acid
PubMed: 27797129
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012055.pub2 -
The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Feb 2015Excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) operations remains to be a persistent problem and weak platelet function certainly contributes to bleeding... (Review)
Review
Excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) operations remains to be a persistent problem and weak platelet function certainly contributes to bleeding diathesis. Antiplatelet therapy (APT) is an integral component of perioperative management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery procedures, both with and without use of CPB. In addition to individual variability in platelet function, different preoperative APT administration/discontinuation management further affects platelet function, which in turn may reflect bleeding tendency. However, the impact of drug-induced platelet inhibition on early postoperative bleeding extent remains difficult to predict. Herein, we reviewed the available evidence on the association between platelet function testing values and the extent of bleeding and transfusion requirements in early perioperative period. Currently, the association between platelet function measured by ex vivo assay and the occurrence of bleeding events remains uncertain. The intent of this review is to provide comprehensive literature insight into published evidence, investigating the possibility of platelet function tests to predict bleeding extent as well as transfusion requirements in cardiac surgery patients.
Topics: Blood Transfusion; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Coronary Artery Bypass; Forecasting; Humans; Monitoring, Physiologic; Perioperative Period; Platelet Function Tests; Point-of-Care Systems; Postoperative Hemorrhage
PubMed: 24983736
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1378191 -
Medicine Nov 2023Recent studies have highlighted the unfavorable prognosis of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who have received prior antiplatelet therapy (PAP).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Recent studies have highlighted the unfavorable prognosis of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who have received prior antiplatelet therapy (PAP). Platelet infusion therapy (PIT) is commonly administered to such patients at many medical institutions, but its efficacy remains a subject of debate.
METHODS
To address this uncertainty, we conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for eligible studies published before June 30, 2023. Our primary outcomes of interest were favorable functional outcome and mortality, while secondary outcomes included the incidence of hematoma expansion and adverse events associated with PIT. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3.
RESULTS
Our analysis included 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 6 retrospective studies, involving a total of 577 patients. Pooled analysis revealed that PIT did not contribute to a better favorable functional outcome at the 3-month follow-up (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89) among ICH patients with PAP. Furthermore, PIT did not significantly reduce the risk of mortality (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.40-1.55) or hematoma expansion (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.65-2.01). Notably, no significant differences in serious adverse events were observed between patients who underwent PIT and those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the available evidence, there is no indication that PIT can enhance the prognosis of spontaneous ICH patients with prior antiplatelet therapy, although this treatment approach appears to be safe. Therefore, routine recommendation of PIT for ICH patients with prior antiplatelet therapy is not warranted.
Topics: Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Transfusion; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Prognosis; Hematoma; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37986382
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036072 -
Transfusion Dec 2019The efficacy of premedication for the prevention of nonhemolytic transfusion reactions remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The efficacy of premedication for the prevention of nonhemolytic transfusion reactions remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effect of premedication on the rate of nonhemolytic transfusion reactions after allogeneic blood transfusion.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
We searched the literature using CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception until October 31, 2018. We included all randomized controlled trials comparing premedication to placebo or no treatment in patients receiving any labile blood product. Outcome measures were reported as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Data were combined for similar outcomes where appropriate using a random-effects model. Analyses were done at both the patient and transfusion level.
RESULTS
Three randomized trials using acetaminophen and antihistamine as premedication met the inclusion criteria. A total of 517 patients received 4444 red blood cell or platelet transfusions. Pooled patient-level estimates with premedication for all nonhemolytic, febrile nonhemolytic, and minor allergic reactions were RR, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.63-1.35); RR, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.26-1.1); and RR, 1.37 (95% CI 0.81-2.31), respectively. Transfusion-level analyses also showed no benefit with premedication. Of 517 patients randomized, only 27 (5.2%) had a history of transfusion reactions.
CONCLUSION
Routine premedication with acetaminophen and antihistamines did not prevent nonhemolytic transfusion reactions; however, the estimate of effect was greatest for febrile reactions. The impact of premedication in patients with a prior history of transfusion reactions remains unknown and requires further evaluation in future clinical trials.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Blood Transfusion; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Premedication; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Transfusion Reaction
PubMed: 31670424
DOI: 10.1111/trf.15566 -
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology Jul 2012There exists uncertainty as to the optimal platelet values when managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. GOALS AND STUDY: A systematic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There exists uncertainty as to the optimal platelet values when managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. GOALS AND STUDY: A systematic review was carried out to determine the optimal approach when managing patients with thrombocytopenia in the setting of nonvariceal upper GI bleeding.
RESULTS
Eighteen of 803 potential articles were selected and reviewed, including 4 randomized controlled trials and 6 cohort studies. The only empirical clinical data available pertained to the management of hematology or oncology patients. There was no high-level evidence that determined the proper threshold of platelet transfusion specifically in GI bleeding. We were, therefore, limited to include principally consensus opinions, recommendations, and guidelines for platelet transfusion trigger as they apply to the treatment (including prophylaxis) of bleeding in general, with a paucity of data addressing major bleeding, let alone bleeding from a gastroenterologic origin. Randomized clinical trials were individually underpowered in allowing definitive conclusions, even though resulting recommendations were supported by similarly underpowered retrospective and prospective observational studies.
CONCLUSIONS
There exist a paucity of data to recommend optimal therapeutic platelet count targets in patients with active GI bleeding. Based principally on expert opinion recommendations, we propose a count of 50×10/L. Some professional associations have suggested in very specific clinical settings (postcardiopulmonary bypass surgery or central nervous system trauma) a higher value of up to 100×10/L. Properly designed randomized trials are required to more precisely address this important clinical question.
Topics: Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Transfusion; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thrombocytopenia
PubMed: 22688143
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31823d33e3 -
Journal of the Neurological Sciences Oct 2020The practice of platelet transfusion to mitigate the deleterious effects of antiplatelet agents on spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains common. However,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The effect of platelet transfusion on functional independence and mortality after antiplatelet therapy associated spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
The practice of platelet transfusion to mitigate the deleterious effects of antiplatelet agents on spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains common. However, the effect of antiplatelet agents on patients with ICH is still controversial and transfusing platelets is not without risk. We performed a meta-analysis in order to determine the effect of platelet transfusion on antiplatelet agent associated ICH.
METHODS
We queried PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases to identify cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized control trials. Study quality was graded by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, as appropriate. Outcomes of interest included functional independence as measured by the modified Rankin Scale and mortality. We compared patients with antiplatelet agent associated ICH who received platelet transfusion to those that did not.
RESULTS
We identified 625 articles. After reviewing 44 full text articles, 5 were deemed appropriate for meta-analysis, including 4 cohort studies and one randomized control trial. Considerable heterogeneity was present among the studies (I > 81% for all analyses). We did not find a significant effect of platelet transfusions on functional independence (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% CI.0.45-3.9) or mortality (OR 0.58, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.12-2.6).
CONCLUSION
We found no evidence for an effect of platelet transfusions on functional independence or mortality following antiplatelet associated ICH. More randomized trials are needed to evaluate platelet transfusion in patients with ICH and proven reduced platelet activity or those requiring neurosurgical intervention.
Topics: Blood Platelets; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Functional Status; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Transfusion
PubMed: 32763508
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117075 -
Oral Diseases Jun 2019To evaluate the evidence for a 50,000/μl platelet count threshold for platelet transfusion for invasive dental procedures in thrombocytopenic patients.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the evidence for a 50,000/μl platelet count threshold for platelet transfusion for invasive dental procedures in thrombocytopenic patients.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
We searched in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (Wiley) and Scopus from 1960 through April 2018 for studies on patients with quantitative platelet disorders not related to medical co-morbidities or medications and undergoing invasive dental procedures. Two reviewers conducted assessments independently.
RESULTS
We found a total of 176 non-duplicate articles, of which 9 cohort studies met our inclusion criteria. The incidence of postoperative bleeding in thrombocytopenic patients was low (4.9%), and we found no difference in bleeding incidence between patients who had platelet transfusion and those who did not. There was no difference in the mean platelet count for patients with and without bleeding. Different modalities are now available to prevent and control bleeding, which may reduce the need for platelet transfusion.
CONCLUSIONS
There is no evidence to support the long-standing dogma of a need for a platelet count ≥ 50,000/μl for safe invasive dental procedures. Platelet transfusion effectiveness for haemostasis support could not be determined based on available data. Local measures and antifibrinolytics are the mainstay for the prevention and management of bleeding.
Topics: Congresses as Topic; Dental Care; Humans; Platelet Count; Platelet Transfusion; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Thrombocytopenia; Tooth Extraction; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31140699
DOI: 10.1111/odi.13082 -
Blood Transfusion = Trasfusione Del... Sep 2022Acquired platelet function disorders (PFD) are rare bleeding diseases that should be suspected in all patients with unexplained mucocutaneous bleedings of recent onset,... (Review)
Review
Acquired platelet function disorders (PFD) are rare bleeding diseases that should be suspected in all patients with unexplained mucocutaneous bleedings of recent onset, with no previous history of haemorrhages, and with normal coagulation test and platelet count. Drug-induced platelet function bleeding disorders are the most frequent PFDs and can easily be identified on the basis of recent administration of platelet-inhibiting drugs. Apart from these, the most challenging acquired PFDs are those caused by autoimmune mechanisms. In fact, demonstration of autoantibodies inhibiting platelet function may be difficult in most non-specialised centres. Among autoimmune PFDs (aPFDs), acquired Glanzmann thrombasthenia (aGT), which is caused by autoantibodies that bind to platelet αIIbβ3 integrin, inhibiting its function, is the most frequent. aGT can be associated with underlying haematological malignancies or autoimmune diseases but can also be idiopathic. More rarely, other immune-mediated PFDs can occur, such as acquired delta storage pool disease (aδSPD). Treatment of aPFDs must rely on the control of acute and chronic bleedings, treatment of the underlying disease in secondary forms, and immunosuppressive treatment for autoantibody reduction or eradication. aPFDs may completely resolve upon treatment of any underlying disease that may be present. In primary aPFDs, and in the majority of secondary forms, treatment relies on immunosuppressive therapies.Here we present a systematic review of previously described immune-mediated aGT and aδSPD cases. Clinical and laboratory characteristics, treatments for the control of bleedings and for the eradication of autoantibodies, and responses to treatments are also discussed. Although no guidelines are available for the management of these very rare conditions, presentation of all cases reported so far can help clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of these life-threatening diseases.
Topics: Albinism; Autoantibodies; Autoimmune Diseases; Hemorrhagic Disorders; Hermanski-Pudlak Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Thrombasthenia
PubMed: 34369869
DOI: 10.2450/2021.0119-21