-
Health Technology Assessment... Feb 2004To ascertain the value of a range of methods - including clinical features, resting and exercise electrocardiography, and rapid access chest pain clinics (RACPCs) - used... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To ascertain the value of a range of methods - including clinical features, resting and exercise electrocardiography, and rapid access chest pain clinics (RACPCs) - used in the diagnosis and early management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), suspected acute myocardial infarction (MI), and exertional angina.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and electronic abstracts of recent cardiological conferences.
REVIEW METHODS
Searches identified studies that considered patients with acute chest pain with data on the diagnostic value of clinical features or an electrocardiogram (ECG); patients with chronic chest pain with data on the diagnostic value of resting or exercise ECG or the effect of a RACPC. Likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated for each study, and pooled LRs were generated with 95% confidence intervals. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed evaluating different assessment strategies for suspected ACS, and a discrete event simulation evaluated models for the assessment of suspected exertional angina.
RESULTS
For acute chest pain, no clinical features in isolation were useful in ruling in or excluding an ACS, although the most helpful clinical features were pleuritic pain (LR+ 0.19) and pain on palpation (LR+ 0.23). ST elevation was the most effective ECG feature for determining MI (with LR+ 13.1) and a completely normal ECG was reasonably useful at ruling this out (LR+ 0.14). Results from 'black box' studies of clinical interpretation of ECGs found very high specificity, but low sensitivity. In the simulation exercise of management strategies for suspected ACS, the point of care testing with troponins was cost-effective. Pre-hospital thrombolysis on the basis of ambulance telemetry was more effective but more costly than if performed in hospital. In cases of chronic chest pain, resting ECG features were not found to be very useful (presence of Q-waves had LR+ 2.56). For an exercise ECG, ST depression performed only moderately well (LR+ 2.79 for a 1 mm cutoff), although this did improve for a 2 mm cutoff (LR+ 3.85). Other methods of interpreting the exercise ECG did not result in dramatic improvements in these results. Weak evidence was found to suggest that RACPCs may be associated with reduced admission to hospital of patients with non-cardiac pain, better recognition of ACS, earlier specialist assessment of exertional angina and earlier diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain. In a simulation exercise of models of care for investigation of suspected exertional angina, RACPCs were predicted to result in earlier diagnosis of both confirmed coronary heart disease (CHD) and non-cardiac chest pain than models of care based around open access exercise tests or routine cardiology outpatients, but they were more expensive. The benefits of RACPCs disappeared if waiting times for further investigation (e.g. angiography) were long (6 months).
CONCLUSIONS
Where an ACS is suspected, emergency referral is justified. ECG interpretation in acute chest pain can be highly specific for diagnosing MI. Point of care testing with troponins is cost-effective in the triaging of patients with suspected ACS. Resting ECG and exercise ECG are of only limited value in the diagnosis of CHD. The potential advantages of RACPCs are lost if there are long waiting times for further investigation. Recommendations for further research include the following: determining the most appropriate model of care to ensure accurate triaging of patients with suspected ACS; establishing the cost-effectiveness of pre-hospital thrombolysis in rural areas; determining the relative cost-effectiveness of rapid access chest pain clinics compared with other innovative models of care; investigating how rapid access chest pain clinics should be managed; and establishing the long-term outcome of patients discharged from RACPCs.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Biomedical Technology; Chest Pain; Coronary Disease; Diagnosis, Differential; Electrocardiography; Exercise Test; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Monte Carlo Method; Myocardial Infarction; Primary Health Care; Reference Standards
PubMed: 14754562
DOI: 10.3310/hta8020 -
Journal of the College of Physicians... Jan 2020The postpericardiotomy syndrome (PPS) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality following heart operation. This systematic review reviewed the literature...
The postpericardiotomy syndrome (PPS) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality following heart operation. This systematic review reviewed the literature regarding PPS. It was found to occur on day 18.3 ±15.9 after cardiac operations, most often after coronary artery bypass grafting, and mitral valve replacement. The most common symptoms were new/worsening pericardial effusions, pleuritic chest pain, and fever. The inflammation markers, such as C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, were found to increase significantly in each patient who had these parameters examined. The subjects were managed conservatively in 472 (83.5%) patients, by surgical pericardial drainage in 85 (15.0%) patients, by thora-/pericardio-centesis in 3 (0.5%) patients, and were under surveillance without being treated in 5 (0.9%) patients. Conservative treatment was likely to be associated with a higher recovery rate. Surgical trauma and cardiopulmonary bypass trigger the systemic inflammatory response, which results in antiheart autoantigen release, and the deposited immune complex could be found in the pericardial, pleural, and lung tissues, thereby provoking the occurrence of PPS. Therapeutic options for the refractory cases are long-term oral corticoids or pericardiectomy. Surgical intervention was warranted in 2.6% of the cases due to cardiac tamponade.
Topics: Humans; Postpericardiotomy Syndrome
PubMed: 31931935
DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.01.62 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2016Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death, accounting for 50,000 to 200,000 deaths annually. It is the third most common cause of mortality among the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death, accounting for 50,000 to 200,000 deaths annually. It is the third most common cause of mortality among the cardiovascular diseases, after coronary artery disease and stroke.The advent of multi-detector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has allowed better assessment of PE regarding visualisation of the peripheral pulmonary arteries, increasing its rate of diagnosis. More cases of peripheral PEs, such as isolated subsegmental PE (SSPE) and incidental PE, have thereby been identified. These two conditions are usually found in patients with few or none of the classic PE symptoms such as haemoptysis or pleuritic pain, acute dyspnoea or circulatory collapse. However, in patients with reduced cardio-pulmonary (C/P) reserve the classic PE symptoms can be found with isolated SSPEs. Incidental SSPE is found casually in asymptomatic patients, usually by diagnostic imaging performed for other reasons (for example routine CT for cancer staging in oncologic patients).Traditionally, all PEs are anticoagulated in a similar manner independent of the location, number and size of the thrombi. It has been suggested that many patients with SSPE may be treated without benefit, increasing adverse events by possible unnecessary use of anticoagulants.Patients with isolated SSPE or incidental PE may have a more benign clinical presentation compared with those with proximal PEs. However, the clinical significance in patients and their prognosis have to be studied to evaluate whether anticoagulation therapy is required.This review is an update of a Cochrane systematic review first published in 2014.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus no intervention in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Vascular Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched December 2015) and CENTRAL (2015, Issue 11). MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and clinical trials databases were also searched.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials of anticoagulation therapy versus no intervention in patients with SSPE or incidental SSPE.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors inspected all citations to ensure reliable selection. We planned for two review authors to independently extract data and to assess the methodological quality of identified trials using the criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
MAIN RESULTS
No studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is no randomised controlled trial evidence for the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus no intervention in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE, and therefore we can not draw any conclusions. Well-conducted research is required before informed practice decisions can be made.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Watchful Waiting
PubMed: 26756331
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010222.pub3 -
Chest Mar 2017Patients with COPD experience episodes of increased inflammation, so-called acute exacerbations of COPD (AE-COPD). In 30% of AE-COPD cases, no clear cause is found.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Patients with COPD experience episodes of increased inflammation, so-called acute exacerbations of COPD (AE-COPD). In 30% of AE-COPD cases, no clear cause is found. Since there is well-known cross talk between inflammation and thrombosis, the objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence, embolus localization, clinical relevance, and clinical markers of pulmonary embolism (PE) in unexplained AE-COPD.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE platforms from 1974 to October 2015. Prospective and cross-sectional studies that included patients with AE-COPD and used pulmonary CT-angiography for diagnosis of PE were included.
RESULTS
The systematic search resulted in 1,650 records. The main reports of 22 articles were reviewed, and 7 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of PE in unexplained AE-COPD was 16.1% (95% CI, 8.3%-25.8%) in a total of 880 patients. Sixty-eight percent of the emboli found were located in the main pulmonary arteries, lobar arteries, or interlobar arteries. Mortality and length of hospital admission seemed to be increased in patients with unexplained AE-COPD and PE. Pleuritic chest pain and cardiac failure were more frequently reported in patients with unexplained AE-COPD and PE. In contrast, signs of respiratory tract infection was less frequently related to PE.
CONCLUSIONS
PE is frequently seen in unexplained AE-COPD. Two-thirds of emboli are found at locations that have a clear indication for anticoagulant treatment. These findings merit clinical attention. PE should receive increased awareness in patients with unexplained AE-COPD, especially when pleuritic chest pain and signs of cardiac failure are present, and no clear infectious origin can be identified.
Topics: Acute Disease; Chest Pain; Computed Tomography Angiography; Disease Progression; Heart Failure; Humans; Length of Stay; Mortality; Prevalence; Pulmonary Artery; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pulmonary Embolism
PubMed: 27522956
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.07.034 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2020Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death, accounting for 50,000 to 200,000 deaths annually. It is the third most common cause of mortality among the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death, accounting for 50,000 to 200,000 deaths annually. It is the third most common cause of mortality among the cardiovascular diseases, after coronary artery disease and stroke. The advent of multi-detector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has allowed better assessment of PE regarding visualisation of the peripheral pulmonary arteries, increasing its rate of diagnosis. More cases of peripheral PEs, such as isolated subsegmental PE (SSPE) and incidental PE, have thereby been identified. These two conditions are usually found in patients with few or none of the classic PE symptoms such as haemoptysis or pleuritic pain, acute dyspnoea or circulatory collapse. However, in patients with reduced cardiopulmonary reserve, classic PE symptoms can be found with isolated SSPEs. Incidental SSPE is found casually in asymptomatic patients, usually by diagnostic imaging performed for other reasons (for example routine CT for cancer staging in oncology patients). Traditionally, all PEs are anticoagulated in a similar manner independent of their location, or number and size of the thrombi. It has been suggested that many patients with SSPE may be treated without benefit, increasing adverse events by a possible unnecessary use of anticoagulants. Patients with isolated SSPE, or incidental PE, may have a more benign clinical presentation compared to those with proximal PEs. However, the clinical significance in patients, and their prognosis, needs to be studied to evaluate whether anticoagulation therapy is required. This is the second update of the Cochrane systematic review published in 2014.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus control in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and AMED databases and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 26 November 2019. We also undertook reference checking to identify additional studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials of anticoagulation therapy versus control in patients with SSPE or incidental SSPE.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors inspected all citations identified to ensure reliable assessment. If relevant studies were identified, we planned for two review authors to independently extract data and to assess the methodological quality of identified trials using the criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
MAIN RESULTS
We did not identify any studies that met the inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is no evidence from randomised controlled trials to assess the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus control in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE. Well-conducted research is required before informed practice decisions can be made.
Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Dyspnea; Humans; Prognosis; Pulmonary Embolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Watchful Waiting
PubMed: 32030721
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010222.pub4 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2014Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death, accounting for 50,000 to 200,000 deaths annually. It is the third most common cause of mortality among the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death, accounting for 50,000 to 200,000 deaths annually. It is the third most common cause of mortality among the cardiovascular diseases, after coronary artery disease and stroke.The advent of multi-detector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has allowed better assessment of PE regarding visualisation of the peripheral pulmonary arteries, increasing its rate of diagnosis. More cases of peripheral PEs, such as isolated subsegmental PE (SSPE) and incidental PE, have thereby been identified. These two conditions are usually found in patients with few or none of the classic PE symptoms such as haemoptysis or pleuritic pain, acute dyspnoea or circulatory collapse. However, in patients with reduced cardio-pulmonary (C/P) reserve the classic PE symptoms can be found with isolated SSPEs. Incidental SSPE is found casually in asymptomatic patients, usually by diagnostic imaging performed for other reasons (for example routine CT for cancer staging in oncologic patients).Traditionally, all PEs are anticoagulated in a similar manner independent of the location, number and size of the thrombi. It has been suggested that many patients with SSPE may be treated without benefit, increasing adverse events by possible unnecessary use of anticoagulants.Patients with isolated SSPE or incidental PE may have a more benign clinical presentation compared with those with proximal PEs. However, the clinical significance in patients and their prognosis have to be studied to evaluate whether anticoagulation therapy is required.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus no intervention in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched October 2013) and CENTRAL (2013, Issue 9). MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and clinical trials databases were also searched (October 2013).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials of anticoagulation therapy versus no intervention in patients with SSPE or incidental SSPE.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors inspected all citations to ensure reliable selection. We planned for two review authors to independently extract data and to assess the methodological quality of identified trials using the criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
MAIN RESULTS
No studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is no randomised controlled trial evidence for the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus no intervention in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE, and therefore we can not draw any conclusions. Well-conducted research is required before informed practice decisions can be made.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Watchful Waiting
PubMed: 24771493
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010222.pub2 -
Substance Abuse Jul 2023The prevalence of marijuana use and its derivatives has surged over the past century, largely due to increasing legalization globally. Despite arguments advocating its... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The prevalence of marijuana use and its derivatives has surged over the past century, largely due to increasing legalization globally. Despite arguments advocating its benefits, marijuana smoking exposes the lungs to harmful combustion byproducts, leading to various respiratory issues such as asthma, pneumonia, emphysema, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
METHODS
We embarked on an extensive literature search, utilizing PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, identifying 200 studies. After the elimination of duplicates, and meticulous review of abstracts and full texts, 55 studies were included in our analysis.
RESULTS
Current literature demonstrates that marijuana use negatively impacts lung function, triggering symptoms like chronic cough, sputum production, and wheezing, and diminishing FEV1/FVC ratio in spirometry tests. Moreover, prolonged or chronic marijuana use augments the risk of respiratory function impairment. While the carcinogenic effects of marijuana are still contested, a weak correlation between marijuana use and lung cancer has been observed in some studies. Additionally, instances of other pathologies linked to marijuana use have been reported, including the development of COPD, pulmonary bullae, spontaneous pneumothorax, pleuritic pain, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, hemoptysis, and pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis.
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence underscores that marijuana use is detrimental to respiratory health. In light of the escalating trend of marijuana use, particularly among the youth, it is imperative to advocate public health messages discouraging its consumption.
PubMed: 37728136
DOI: 10.1177/08897077231186228 -
PloS One 2021The prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AE-COPD) is highly controversial. We conducted a systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AE-COPD) is highly controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the epidemiology and characteristics of PE with AE-COPD for current studies.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases for studies published prior to October 21, 2020. Pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals were used as effect measures for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively.
RESULTS
A total of 17 studies involving 3170 patients were included. The prevalence of PE and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in AE-COPD patients was 17.2% (95% CI: 13.4%-21.3%) and 7.1% (95% CI: 3.7%-11.4%%), respectively. Dyspnea (OR = 6.77, 95% CI: 1.97-23.22), pleuritic chest pain (OR = 3.25, 95% CI: 2.06-5.12), lower limb asymmetry or edema (OR = 2.46, 95% CI:1.51-4.00), higher heart rates (MD = 20.51, 95% CI: 4.95-36.08), longer hospital stays (MD = 3.66, 95% CI: 3.01-4.31) were associated with the PE in the AE-COPD patients. Levels of D-dimer (MD = 1.51, 95% CI: 0.80-2.23), WBC counts (MD = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.14-2.70) were significantly higher and levels of PaO2 was lower (MD = -17.20, 95% CI: -33.94- -0.45, P<0.05) in the AE-COPD with PE group. The AE-COPD with PE group had increased risk of fatal outcome than the AE-COPD group (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.43-3.50).
CONCLUSIONS
The prevalence of PE during AE-COPD varies considerably among the studies. AE-COPD patients with PE experienced an increased risk of death, especially among the ICU patients. Understanding the potential risk factors for PE may help clinicians identify AE-COPD patients at increased risk of PE.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42021226568.
Topics: Acute Disease; Biomarkers; Chest Pain; Dyspnea; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Humans; Length of Stay; Odds Ratio; Prevalence; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pulmonary Edema; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk Factors; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 34473738
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256480 -
BMC Pulmonary Medicine Nov 2021Chlamydia pneumoniae is a common cause of atypical community acquired pneumonia (CAP). The diagnostic approach of chlamydial infections remains a challenge. Diagnosis of...
BACKGROUND
Chlamydia pneumoniae is a common cause of atypical community acquired pneumonia (CAP). The diagnostic approach of chlamydial infections remains a challenge. Diagnosis of delayed chlamydial-associated complications, involving complex autoimmune pathophysiological mechanisms, is still more challenging. C. pneumoniae-related cardiac complications have been rarely reported, including cases of endocarditis, myocarditis and pericarditis.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 40-year old female was hospitalized for pleuropericarditis following lower respiratory tract infection. The patient had been hospitalized for CAP (fever, dyspnea, chest X-ray positive for consolidation on the left upper lobe) 5 weeks ago and had received ceftriaxone and moxifloxacin. Four weeks after her discharge, the patient presented with fever, shortness of breath and pleuritic chest pain and was readmitted because of pericardial and bilateral pleural effusions (mainly left). The patient did not improve on antibiotics and sequential introduction of colchicine and methylprednisolone was performed. The patient presented impressive clinical and laboratory response. Several laboratory and clinical assessments failed to demonstrate any etiological factor for serositis. Chlamydial IgM and IgG antibodies were positive and serial measurements showed increasing kinetics for IgG. Gold standard polymerase chain reaction of respiratory tract samples was not feasible but possibly would not have provided any additional information since CAP occurred 5 weeks ago. The patient was discharged under colchicine and tapered methylprednisolone course. During regular clinic visits, she remained in good clinical condition without pericardial and pleural effusions relapse.
CONCLUSIONS
C. pneumoniae should be considered as possible pathogen in case of pleuritis and/or pericarditis during or after a lower respiratory tract infection. In a systematic review of the literature only five cases of C. pneumoniae associated pericarditis were identified. Exact mechanisms of cardiovascular damage have not yet been defined, yet autoimmune pathways might be implicated.
Topics: Adult; Chlamydophila Infections; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; Female; Humans; Pericarditis
PubMed: 34809625
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-021-01743-9 -
The American Journal of Medicine Sep 2004To assess the accuracy of bedside findings for diagnosing coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To assess the accuracy of bedside findings for diagnosing coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction.
METHODS
A MEDLINE search was performed to retrieve articles published from January 1966 to January 2003 that were relevant to the bedside diagnosis of coronary disease in adults.
RESULTS
In patients with stable, intermittent chest pain, the most useful bedside predictors for a diagnosis of coronary disease were found to be the presence of typical angina (likelihood ratio [LR]=5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.2 to 7.8), serum cholesterol level >300 mg/dL (LR=4.0; 95% CI: 2.5 to 6.3), history of prior myocardial infarction (LR=3.8; 95% CI: 2.1 to 6.8), and age >70 years (LR=2.6; 95% CI: 1.8 to 4.0). Nonanginal chest pain (LR=0.1; 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.2), pain duration >30 minutes (LR=0.1; 95% CI: 0.0 to 0.9), and intermittent dysphagia (LR=0.2; 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.8) argued against a diagnosis of coronary disease. In patients with acute chest pain, the most important bedside predictors for a diagnosis of myocardial infarction were new ST elevation (LR=22; 95% CI: 16 to 30), new Q waves (LR=22; 95% CI: 7.6 to 62), and new ST depression (LR=4.5; 95% CI: 3.6 to 5.6). A normal electrocardiogram (LR=0.2; 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.3), chest wall tenderness (LR=0.3; 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.4), and pain that was pleuritic (LR=0.2; 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.3), sharp (LR=0.3; 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.5), or positional (LR=0.3; 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.5) argued against the diagnosis of myocardial infarction.
CONCLUSION
The accuracy of bedside predictors depends on the clinical setting. In the evaluation of stable, intermittent chest pain, a patient's description of pain was found to be the most important predictor of underlying coronary disease. In the evaluation of acute chest pain, the electrocardiogram was the most useful bedside predictor for a diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Aside from the extremes in cholesterol values, the analysis of traditional risk factors changed the probability of coronary disease or myocardial infarction very little or not at all.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Angina Pectoris; Arcus Senilis; Coronary Artery Disease; Deglutition Disorders; Diagnosis, Differential; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Likelihood Functions; Male; Medical History Taking; Middle Aged; Physical Examination; Point-of-Care Systems; Predictive Value of Tests; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sensitivity and Specificity; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors
PubMed: 15336583
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.03.021