-
Nutrients Mar 2023There is a lack of comprehensive reports on nutrient deficiencies and dietary intake among various age groups of children in China. The objective of this review is to... (Review)
Review
There is a lack of comprehensive reports on nutrient deficiencies and dietary intake among various age groups of children in China. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the nutrient status, intake, and diet adequacy of Chinese children (0-18 years old). PubMed and Scopus were searched for literature published between January 2010 and July 2022. A systematic review approach with a quality assessment was performed to analyze 2986 identified articles in English and Chinese. Eighty-three articles were included in the analysis. In younger children, anemia and iron and Vitamin A deficiencies remain severe public health problems, despite high Vitamin A and adequate iron intake. In older children, a high prevalence of selenium; Vitamin A and D deficiencies; and inadequate intakes of Vitamins A, D, B, C, selenium, and calcium were reported. Intakes of dairy, soybeans, fruits, and vegetables were below recommended levels. High intakes of iodine, total and saturated fat, and sodium and low dietary diversity scores were also reported. As nutritional concerns vary with age and region, future nutrition interventions should be tailored accordingly.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Diet; East Asian People; Energy Intake; Iron; Nutrients; Selenium; Vitamin A
PubMed: 36986271
DOI: 10.3390/nu15061536 -
Current Pharmaceutical Design 2023In recent times, modifying dietary habits to control cardiovascular risk factors has gained significant attention. However, previous studies have yielded inconsistent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
In recent times, modifying dietary habits to control cardiovascular risk factors has gained significant attention. However, previous studies have yielded inconsistent results regarding the effects of lycopene and tomato consumption on cardiovascular risk factors.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to assess the impact of consuming lycopene and tomatoes on various cardiovascular risks factors such as lipid profile, glycemic control markers, blood pressure, inflammation, oxidative stress, and body weight.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was carried out using electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, up to November 2022 to identify eligible Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of lycopene and tomato consumption on cardiovascular risk factors. Heterogeneity tests of the selected trials were performed using the I statistic. Random effects models were assessed based on the heterogeneity tests, and pooled data were determined as the weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Out of 27,438 records initially identified, a total of 34 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that lycopene consumption was associated with a significant reduction in malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, indicating a potential benefit in reducing oxidative stress. However, lycopene and tomato consumption did not have significant effects on other cardiovascular risk factors such as triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), fasting blood glucose (FBG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 (ICAM-1), c-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), body weight, and body mass index (BMI).
CONCLUSION
Overall, the findings showed that lycopene and tomato consumption did not affect cardiovascular risk factors. However, lycopene supplementation may result in a significant improvement in MDA levels. With the view to confirming these results, further studies with long-term duration and different doses are needed.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Lycopene; Solanum lycopersicum; GRADE Approach; Cholesterol, LDL; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Body Weight; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37496241
DOI: 10.2174/1381612829666230726112510 -
Archives of Dermatology Apr 2012To summarize the current state of evidence for combination topical and systemic therapies for mild to severe psoriasis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To summarize the current state of evidence for combination topical and systemic therapies for mild to severe psoriasis.
DATA SOURCES
We performed a systematic search for all entries in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Review, and EMBASE related to combination treatments for psoriasis through July 2010.
STUDY SELECTION
We included randomized controlled trials that reported proportion of disease clearance or mean change in clinical severity score (or provided these data through communication with study authors) for efficacy of a combination treatment for psoriasis compared with 1 or more corresponding monotherapies.
DATA EXTRACTION
Study data were extracted by 3 independent investigators, with disagreement resolved by consensus. The proportion of patients who achieved clearance, definition of clearance, means and standard deviations for baseline disease symptom score and final disease symptom score, and major design characteristics were extracted for each study.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Combination treatments consisting of vitamin D derivative and corticosteroid, vitamin D derivative and UV-B, vitamin A derivative and psoralen-UV-A, vitamin A derivative and corticosteroid, vitamin A derivative and UV-B, corticosteroid and hydrocolloid occlusion dressings, UV-B and alefacept, and vitamins A and D derivatives were more effective than 1 or more monotherapies using the likelihood of clearance as the outcome. Blinding status and potency of the corticosteroid treatment used were significant sources of heterogeneity between studies.
CONCLUSIONS
The results demonstrate the need for additional long-term trials with standardized outcome measures to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of combination therapies for psoriasis and highlight the possible effects of trial design characteristics on results.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Balneology; Bandages, Hydrocolloid; Combined Modality Therapy; Dermatologic Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; PUVA Therapy; Psoriasis; Ultraviolet Therapy; Vitamin A; Vitamin D; Vitamins
PubMed: 22184718
DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.1916 -
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) May 2024Epidemiological studies have shown that a diet rich in bioactive components significantly reduces cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality. In this sense, there is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Epidemiological studies have shown that a diet rich in bioactive components significantly reduces cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality. In this sense, there is a need for meta-analytical research that confirms this phenomenon and increases specific knowledge about certain bioactive compounds such as carotenoids. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aim to disseminate knowledge about the sources of carotenoids in fruit consumed in the north of Brazil which are outside the Brazilian trade balance. A systematic review and a meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines were conducted based on a random effects synthesis of multivariable-adjusted relative risks (RRs). Searches of seven sources were carried out, including PubMed, Science Direct from Elsevier, Web of Science, Scielo, Eric Research and Google Scholar databases. The systematic review was guided by a systematic review protocol based on the POT strategy (population, outcome and type of study) adapted for use in this research. Mendeley was a resource used to organize and manage references and exclude duplicates of studies selected for review. In this review, we present the potential bioactive compounds concentrated in little-known fruit species from the Amazon and their benefits. Consuming fruits that are rich in notable constituents such as carotenoids is important for the prevention of chronic non-communicable diseases through anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant properties, as well as antivirals, immunomodulators and antioxidants agents that directly affect the immune response.
Topics: Humans; Antioxidants; Brazil; Carotenoids; Feeding Behavior; Fruit; Cardiovascular Diseases
PubMed: 38792052
DOI: 10.3390/molecules29102190 -
Nutrients Mar 2023The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review on the influence of dietary and nutraceutical interventions as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review on the influence of dietary and nutraceutical interventions as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT). A literature search for randomized, controlled clinical trials (RCTs) was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science. Trial inclusion criteria included the application of a defined nutritional intervention (food, beverages, or supplements) adjunctive to NSPT compared to NSPT alone with at least one measured periodontal parameter (pocket probing depths (PPD) or clinical attachment level (CAL)). Of 462 search results, 20 clinical trials relating to periodontitis and nutritional interventions were identified, of which, in total, 14 studies could be included. Eleven studies examined supplements containing lycopene, folate, chicory extract, juice powder, micronutrients and plant extracts, omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin E, or vitamin D. Three studies examined food-based interventions (kiwifruit, green or oolong tea). Due to limited information on within-group differences in the studies, results were descriptively analyzed. A significant positive effect on periodontal parameters (PPD, bleeding on probing) was found for vitamin E, chicory extract, juice powder, green tea, and oolong tea. Heterogeneous effects were found for lycopene, folate, omega-3 fatty acids, and vitamin D. No effects on PPD were found for adjunct kiwifruit (in combination with NSPT). Risk of bias via RoB2 revealed a low risk of bias with some concerns. There was a high heterogeneity in the type of nutritional interventions. The adjunctive use of various supplements and green/oolong tea led to positive and significant effects of the nutritional interventions on clinical periodontal outcome parameters. In the context of non-surgical periodontal therapy, an adjunctive intake of micronutrients, omega-3 fatty acids, green/oolong tea, and polyphenols and flavonoids could be beneficial. Long-term clinical studies with full data reports (especially within-group differences) are needed for conducting a meta-analysis.
Topics: Humans; Chronic Periodontitis; Dietary Supplements; Folic Acid; Lycopene; Plant Extracts; Powders; Tea; Vitamin D; Vitamin E
PubMed: 36986267
DOI: 10.3390/nu15061538 -
The British Journal of Nutrition Feb 2012Lutein and zeaxanthin are thought to decrease the incidence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD); however, findings have been inconsistent. We conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Lutein and zeaxanthin are thought to decrease the incidence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD); however, findings have been inconsistent. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin and AMD risk. Relevant studies were identified by searching five databases up to April 2010. Reference lists of articles were retrieved, and experts were contacted. Literature search, data extraction and study quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers and results were pooled quantitatively using meta-analysis methods. The potential sources of heterogeneity and publication bias were also estimated. The search yielded six longitudinal cohort studies. The pooled relative risk (RR) for early AMD, comparing the highest with the lowest category of lutein and zeaxanthin intake, was 0·96 (95 % CI 0·78, 1·17). Dietary intake of these carotenoids was significantly related with a reduction in risk of late AMD (RR 0·74; 95 % CI 0·57, 0·97); and a statistically significant inverse association was observed between lutein and zeaxanthin intake and neovascular AMD risk (RR 0·68; 95 % CI 0·51, 0·92). The results were essentially consistent among subgroups stratified by participant characteristics. The findings of the present meta-analysis indicate that dietary lutein and zeaxanthin is not significantly associated with a reduced risk of early AMD, whereas an increase in the intake of these carotenoids may be protective against late AMD. However, additional studies are needed to confirm these relationships.
Topics: Age of Onset; Aged; Diet; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Lutein; Macular Degeneration; Middle Aged; Risk; Wet Macular Degeneration; Xanthophylls; Zeaxanthins
PubMed: 21899805
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114511004260 -
BMC Geriatrics Mar 2023Given their potent antioxidation properties, carotenoids play a role in delaying and preventing dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, observational... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Given their potent antioxidation properties, carotenoids play a role in delaying and preventing dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, observational studies have found inconsistent results regarding the associations between blood carotenoid levels and the risk of dementia and MCI. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between blood carotenoid levels and the risk of dementia and MCI.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases to retrieve relevant English articles published from their inception until February 23, 2023. Study quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effect meta-analyses. Ultimately, 23 studies (n = 6610) involving 1422 patients with dementia, 435 patients with MCI, and 4753 controls were included.
RESULTS
Our meta-analysis showed that patients with dementia had lower blood lycopene (SMD: -0.521; 95%CI: -0.741, -0.301), α-carotene (SMD: -0.489; 95%CI: -0.697, -0.281), β-carotene (SMD: -0.476; 95%CI: -0.784, -0.168), lutein (SMD: -0.516; 95%CI: -0.753, -0.279), zeaxanthin (SMD: -0.571; 95%CI: -0.910, -0.232) and β-cryptoxanthin (SMD: -0.617; 95%CI: -0.953, -0.281) than the controls. Our results indicated that blood carotenoid levels were significantly lower in patients with dementia than in controls, despite high heterogeneity across the studies. Owing to insufficient data, we did not observe a similar and stable relationship between blood carotenoid levels and MCI.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis indicated that lower blood carotenoid levels may be a risk factor for dementia and MCI.
Topics: Humans; Cognitive Dysfunction; Carotenoids; beta Carotene; Lutein; Dementia
PubMed: 36997905
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03900-7 -
Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Oct 2022There is increasing awareness of the importance of nutritional support in cancer treatment including the interaction with immunity. Immunonutrition is the provision of...
Impact of enteral immunonutrition on infectious complications and immune and inflammatory markers in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
There is increasing awareness of the importance of nutritional support in cancer treatment including the interaction with immunity. Immunonutrition is the provision of one or more nutrients (e.g. Vitamins A, D, or E, omega-3 fatty acids, arginine and glutamine) known to modulate immune function when given at levels above those normally encountered in the diet in order to support immune system function or modulate its activity, including control of inflammation. We reviewed the role of oral or enteral immunonutrition versus standard nutrition on infection and infection-related biomarkers in adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
METHODS
A systematic search of oral or enteral immunonutrition versus standard nutrition in adult cancer patients during chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy or haematopoietic stem cell transplant was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL. The search was limited to randomised controlled trials. Our primary outcome was infectious episodes or immune-related biomarkers (e.g. immune cell numbers, inflammatory markers). Secondary outcomes included incidence of malnutrition or cachexia, non-infection related adverse events (AEs), rate of remission, survival, and delays or incomplete cycles of chemotherapy. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB 2.0 and study quality was assessed using CASP for RCTs.
RESULTS
The search yielded seven studies involving 521 patients (261 immunonutrition, 260 control) for analysis. All studies enrolled patients with solid tumours (no haematological malignancies). Studies were heterogenous for cancer type (upper gastrointestinal, head and neck, pancreatic and lung), immunonutrient composition (omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin A, E, glutamine, arginine or nucleotides), delivery route (enteral nutrition or oral nutritional supplement) and control used. Intervention period ranged from 4 to 14 weeks. No study reported absolute number of infections. Three studies reported AEs including potential infectious episodes of febrile neutropenia, pneumonitis and mucositis with oral candidiasis. Some studies report a decrease in blood concentrations of CRP and TNF-α with immunonutrition.
CONCLUSION
There is currently insufficient evidence to define a role for immunonutrition on infectious episodes during chemotherapy in adult cancer patients. Further well-defined studies that account for degree of malnutrition, dose, timing and duration of immunonutrition in specific well-defined cancer groups using a standardised outcome framework are needed.
Topics: Adult; Arginine; Biomarkers; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Glutamine; Humans; Malnutrition; Neoplasms; Nucleotides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Vitamin A; Vitamins
PubMed: 36067585
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.07.039 -
Nutrients Mar 2022β-carotene is widely available in plant-based foods, while the efficacy of β-carotene supplementation on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk remains controversial.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
β-carotene is widely available in plant-based foods, while the efficacy of β-carotene supplementation on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk remains controversial. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials to investigate the associations between β-carotene supplementation and CVD risk as well as mortality. We conducted literature searches across eight databases and screened the publications from January 1900 to March 2022 on the topic of β-carotene treatments and cardiovascular outcomes. There were 10 trials and 16 reports included in the meta-analysis with a total of 182,788 individuals enrolled in the study. Results from the random-effects models indicated that β-carotene supplementation slightly increased overall cardiovascular incidence (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.08) and was constantly associated with increased cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.19). Subgroup analyses suggested that, when β-carotene treatments were given singly, a higher risk of cardiovascular outcomes was observed (RR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.12). In addition, cigarettes smoking was shown to be a risk behavior associated with increased cardiovascular incidence and mortality in the β-carotene intervention group. In sum, the evidence of this study demonstrated that β-carotene supplementation had no beneficial effects on CVD incidence and potential harmful effects on CVD mortality. Further studies on understanding the efficacy of multivitamin supplementation in nutrient-deficient or sub-optimal populations are important for developing the tolerable upper intake level for β-carotene of different age and sex groups.
Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Dietary Supplements; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vitamins; beta Carotene
PubMed: 35334942
DOI: 10.3390/nu14061284 -
Clinical Breast Cancer Dec 2018The association between vitamin A intake and breast cancer survival has been inconsistent. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to summarize the results on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The association between vitamin A intake and breast cancer survival has been inconsistent. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to summarize the results on the association between dietary or supplement vitamin A and its derivatives and breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed from inception to January 31, 2018. The summary hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using a random effects model.
RESULTS
Ten studies (8 cohort, 1 clinical trial, and 1 of pooled studies), with 19,450 breast cancer cases, were included in the meta-analysis. The dietary intake of β-carotene was significantly associated with improved breast cancer OS, with a summary hazard ratio of 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.99; I = 37.5%) for the highest versus lowest intake and 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.99; I = 38.7%) per 1200 μg/day increment of intake when assessing diet before diagnosis. Meta-regression analysis showed that adjustment for body mass index was a modified factor for the association between the intake of β-carotene and breast cancer OS (P = .013). However, the intake of other vitamin A derivatives (eg, α-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene, retinol, lutein) had no effect on breast cancer prognosis when assessing diet before and after the diagnosis.
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest limited evidence for the significantly inverse association between the prediagnosis dietary intake of β-carotene and OS among women with breast cancer. However, the intake of other vitamin A derivatives was not significantly associated with survival.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Prognosis; Survival Rate; Vitamin A; Vitamins
PubMed: 30190194
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.07.025