-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2010Treatments for Barrett's oesophagus, the precursor lesion of adenocarcinoma, are available but whether these therapies effectively prevent the development of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Treatments for Barrett's oesophagus, the precursor lesion of adenocarcinoma, are available but whether these therapies effectively prevent the development of adenocarcinoma, and in some cases eradicate the Barrett's oesophagus segment, remains unclear.
OBJECTIVES
To summarise, quantify and compare the efficacy of pharmacological, surgical and endoscopic treatments for the eradication of dysplastic and non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus and prevention of these states from progression to adenocarcinoma.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2004, issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to June 2008).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing medical, endoscopic or non-resectional surgical treatments for Barrett's oesophagus. The primary outcome measures were complete eradication of Barrett's and dysplasia at 12 months, and reduction in the number of patients progressing to cancer at five years or latest time point.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Three authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the trials included in the analysis.
MAIN RESULTS
Sixteen studies, including 1074 patients, were included. The mean number of participants in the studies was small (n = 49; range 8 to 208). Most studies did not report on the primary outcomes. Medical and surgical interventions to reduce symptoms and sequelae of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) did not induce significant eradication of Barrett's oesophagus or dysplasia. Endoscopic therapies (photodynamic therapy (PDT with aminolevulinic acid or porfimer sodium), argon plasma coagulation (APC) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)) all induced regression of Barrett's oesophagus and dysplasia. The data for photodynamic therapy were heterogeneous with a mean eradication rate of 51% for Barrett's oesophagus and between 56% and 100% for dysplasia, depending on the treatment regimens. The variation in photodynamic therapy eradication rates for dysplasia was dependent on the drug, source and dose of light. Radiofrequency ablation resulted in eradication rates of 82% and 94% for Barrett's oesophagus and dysplasia respectively, compared to a sham treatment. Endoscopic treatments were generally well tolerated, however all were associated with some buried glands, particularly following argon plasma coagulation and photodynamic therapy, as well as photosensitivity and strictures induced by porfimer sodium based photodynamic therapy in particular.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Despite their failure to eradicate Barrett's oesophagus, the role of medical and surgical interventions to reduce the troubling symptoms and sequelae of GORD is not questioned. Whether therapies for GORD reduce the cancer risk is not yet known. Ablative therapies have an increasing role in the management of dysplasia within Barrett's and current data would favour the use of radiofrequency ablation compared with photodynamic therapy. Radiofrequency ablation has been shown to yield significantly fewer complications than photodynamic therapy and is very efficacious at eradicating both dysplasia and Barrett's itself. However, long-term follow-up data are still needed before radiofrequency ablation can be used in routine clinical care without the need for very careful post-treatment surveillance. More clinical trial data and in particular randomised controlled trials are required to assess whether or not the cancer risk is reduced in routine clinical practice.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Barrett Esophagus; Catheter Ablation; Esophageal Neoplasms; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans; Laser Coagulation; Photochemotherapy; Precancerous Conditions; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 20091557
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004060.pub2 -
BMC Gastroenterology Sep 2010Recently, several new endoscopic treatments have been used to treat patients with Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia. This systematic review aimed to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Recently, several new endoscopic treatments have been used to treat patients with Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia. This systematic review aimed to determine the safety and effectiveness of these treatments compared with esophagectomy.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was undertaken to identify studies of endoscopic treatments for Barrett's esophagus or early stage esophageal cancer. Information from the selected studies was extracted by two independent reviewers. Study quality was assessed and information was tabulated to identify trends or patterns. Results were pooled across studies for each outcome. Safety (occurrence of adverse events) and effectiveness (complete eradication of dysplasia) were compared across different treatments.
RESULTS
The 101 studies that met the selection criteria included 8 endoscopic techniques and esophagectomy; only 12 were comparative studies. The quality of evidence was generally low. Methods and outcomes were inconsistently reported. Protocols, outcomes measured, follow-up times and numbers of treatment sessions varied, making it difficult to calculate pooled estimates.The surgical mortality rate was 1.2%, compared to 0.04% in 2831 patients treated endoscopically (1 death). Adverse events were more severe and frequent with esophagectomy, and included anastomotic leaks (9.4%), wound infections (4.1%) and pulmonary complications (4.1%). Four patients (0.1%) treated endoscopically experienced bleeding requiring transfusions. The stricture rate with esophagectomy (5.3%) was lower than with porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy (18.5%), but higher than aminolevulinic acid (ALA) 60 mg/kg PDT (1.4%). Dysphagia and odynophagia varied in frequency across modalities, with the highest rates reported for multipolar electrocoagulation (MPEC). Photosensitivity, an adverse event that occurs only with photodynamic therapy, was experienced by 26.4% of patients who received porfimer sodium.Some radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or argon plasma coagulation (APC) studies (used in multiple sessions) reported rates of almost 100% for complete eradication of dysplasia. But the study methods and findings were not adequately described. The other studies of endoscopic treatments reported similarly high rates of complete eradication.
CONCLUSIONS
Endoscopic treatments offer safe and effective alternatives to esophagectomy for patients with Barrett's esophagus and high grade dysplasia. Unfortunately, shortcomings in the published studies make it impossible to determine the comparative effectiveness of each of the endoscopic treatments.
Topics: Barrett Esophagus; Catheter Ablation; Esophagectomy; Esophagoscopy; Humans; Photochemotherapy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 20875123
DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-111 -
Journal of Investigative and Clinical... Feb 2018The aim of the present study was to systematically review the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the management of oral potentially-malignant disorders (PMDS) and... (Review)
Review
AIM
The aim of the present study was to systematically review the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the management of oral potentially-malignant disorders (PMDS) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
METHODS
From 1985 to 2015, PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched using different combinations of the following key words: PDT, oral precancer, leukoplakia, erythroplakia, erythroleukoplakia, verrucous hyperplasia, oral submucous fibrosis, and HNSCC. Review articles, experimental studies, case reports, commentaries, letters to the editor, unpublished articles, and articles published in languages other than English were excluded.
RESULTS
Twenty-six studies were included in the present study. The number of patients ranged from 2 to 147, with a mean age of 50-67 years. The reported numbers of PMDS and HNSCC ranged between 5 and 225. Photosensitizers used were aminolevulinic acid, meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin, Foscan, hematoporphyrin derivatives, Photofrin, Photosan, and chlorine-e6. Laser wavelength, power density, irradiation duration were 585-652 nm, 50-500 mW/cm , and 1-143 minutes, respectively. Complete, partial, and no response to PDT was found in 22.58%-100%, 4%-66%, and 0%-38.70% of PMDS, respectively, and 16%-100% of complete response in HNSCC patients.
CONCLUSION
PDT is effective in the management of PMDS and HNSCC.
Topics: Aminolevulinic Acid; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Chlorophyllides; Databases, Factual; Dihematoporphyrin Ether; Erythroplasia; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Hematoporphyrins; Humans; Hyperplasia; Indoles; Laser Therapy; Lasers; Leukoplakia; Leukoplakia, Oral; Mesoporphyrins; Oral Submucous Fibrosis; Organometallic Compounds; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents; Porphyrins; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28480637
DOI: 10.1111/jicd.12270 -
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Apr 20085-Aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) is the naturally occurring metabolic precursor of an endogenously formed photosensitiser, protoporphyrin IX. It is used topically to treat... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
5-Aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) is the naturally occurring metabolic precursor of an endogenously formed photosensitiser, protoporphyrin IX. It is used topically to treat benign and malignant skin disorders by a process called photodynamic therapy (PDT). Recently, data are emerging on its systemic use in the treatment of dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the use of ALA-PDT for the treatment of dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus.
METHODS
A systematic literature review and synopsis is given.
CONCLUSION
ALA is an attractive alternative to the currently approved photosensitiser (porfimer sodium) due to its oral route of administration, shorter generalised skin photosensitivity period and lower rate of stricture formation. The studies presented demonstrate that ALA-PDT is both safe and effective for the treatment of dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aminolevulinic Acid; Animals; Barrett Esophagus; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Esophageal Neoplasms; Humans; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents
PubMed: 18345960
DOI: 10.1517/14656566.9.5.851 -
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Sep 2020Extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) is a rare intraepithelial adenocarcinoma that arises in areas rich in apocrine sweat glands. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) is a rare intraepithelial adenocarcinoma that arises in areas rich in apocrine sweat glands. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a non-invasive technique demonstrating clinical efficacy in various case reports and case series for the treatment of EMPD.
METHODS
A review of the current literature of patients with EMPD treated with PDT.
RESULTS
177 patients with 211 lesions were included in this review with an overall complete response rate of 59.7 %. Lesion size was correlated with the efficacy of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) PDT. Topical methyl-ALA had lower complete response rates compared to ALA. Systemic PDT with intravenous sodium porfimer had high response rates but can be associated with more adverse reactions. The efficacy of PDT was enhanced with the combination of other treatments such as surgery, imiquimod, or laser ablation. PDT was also shown to be effective for previously treated lesions, recurrent lesions, and select invasive lesions.
CONCLUSION
PDT can be a therapeutic option for EMPD patients. Given the lack of PDT guidelines, general recommendations for treatment are offered.
Topics: Aminolevulinic Acid; Dihematoporphyrin Ether; Humans; Paget Disease, Extramammary; Photochemotherapy; Photosensitizing Agents
PubMed: 32645437
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101911